SSDT gotcha – Moving a file erases code analysis suppressions
Posted
by jamiet
on SQL Blog
See other posts from SQL Blog
or by jamiet
Published on Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:42:09 GMT
Indexed on
2013/10/17
16:17 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 378
SQL Server Data Tools
|SSDT
I discovered a little wrinkle in SSDT today that is worth knowing about if you are managing your database schemas using SSDT. In short, if a file is moved to a different folder in the project then any code analysis suppressions that reference that file will disappear from the suppression file. This makes sense if you think about it because the paths stored in the suppression file are no longer valid, but you probably won’t be aware of it until it happens to you. If you don’t know what code analysis is or you don’t know what the suppression file is then you can probably stop reading now, otherwise read on for a simple short demo.
Let’s create a new project and add a stored procedure to it called sp_dummy.
Naming stored procedures with a sp_ prefix is generally frowned upon and hence SSDT static code analysis will look for occurrences of this and flag them. So, the next thing we need to do is turn on static code analysis in the project properties:
A subsequent build causes a code analysis warning as we might expect:
Let’s suppose we actually don’t mind stored procedures with sp_ prefixes, we can just right-click on the message to suppress and get rid of it:
That causes a suppression file to get created in our project:
Notice that the suppression file contains a relative path to the file that has had the suppression placed upon it. Now if we simply move the file within our project to a new folder notice that the suppression that we just created gets removed from the suppression file:
As I alluded above this behaviour is intuitive because the path originally stored in the suppression file is no longer relevant but you’re probably not going to be aware of it until it happens to you and messages that you thought you had suppressed start appearing again. Definitely one to be aware of.
© SQL Blog or respective owner