Is this a typo in the Artistic License 2.0?

Posted by IQAndreas on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by IQAndreas
Published on 2013-10-23T06:34:31Z Indexed on 2013/10/23 10:15 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 149

Filed under:
|

I'm not sure if this would fit better in StackExchange/English, but regardless, there is no practical use to the answer, other than to cure my curiosity.

Note this sentence at the end of the Artistic License 2.0:

THE PACKAGE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS' AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES.

It does not affect any legal aspects of the license, but is there a reason they mixed the use of single and double quotes on AS IS? The license is so new that this wouldn't have been for "command prompt friendly" reasons.

Is there special use or meaning behind this in the English language, or was it a typo?

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about licensing

Related posts about open-source