Does any body see a reson in DesignForExtension Check in Checkstyle?

Posted by Roman Ivanov on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Roman Ivanov
Published on 2013-10-26T03:49:46Z Indexed on 2013/10/26 3:54 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 201

Filed under:

checkstyle

Check: http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/config_design.html#DesignForExtension

False positives: Checkstyle "Method Not Designed For Extension" error being incorrectly issued? checkstyle Method is not designed for extension - needs to be abstract, final or empty https://sourceforge.net/p/checkstyle/bugs/688/

Look like all switch that Check off in their configurations.

Does anybody could show real code example where this Check is useful ? and good for developers.

Related posts about checkstyle

Checkstyle: cannot summarise issues per author ?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi all, I'm trying to use checkstyle for a java project but I can't seem to get it working properly: While it apparently runs smoothly, the html report doesn't give any info per authors as it should, i.e. the authors table is empty. The thing is I don't know how checkstyle identify an author. Does… >>> More
Maven 2 checkstyle plugin version 2.5 - Problem with configLocation

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi there, I am using checkstyle plugin in maven 2. I now want to switch my config file, from the default one to a) an online file, or b) a local file. I tried the following two things, which both didnt work. Any suggestions? A) Local file, which is directly in my project folder next to the pom… >>> More
Avoiding CheckStyle magic number errors in JDBC queries.

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hello, I am working on a group project for class and we are trying out CheckStyle. I am fairly comfortable with Java but have never touched JDBC or done any database work before this. I was wondering if there is an elegant way to avoid magic number errors in preparedStatement calls, consider: … >>> More
Allow single-line accessor (getter/setter) syntax with Checkstyle

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
We'd like to have trivial Java property accessors using a single line syntax, so they take up much much less space, and are more readable (in terms of 'seeing' the set of accessors quickly). But we do want to enforce multi-line method syntax for everything else in our checkstyle configuration. But… >>> More
Checkstyle for C#?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm looking to find something along the lines of Checkstyle for Visual Studio. I've recently started a new gig doing .NET work and realized that coding standards here are a bit lacking. While I'm still a young guy and far from the most experienced developer I'm trying to lead by example and get… >>> More

Developer IT

Does any body see a reson in DesignForExtension Check in Checkstyle? - Developer IT

Does any body see a reson in DesignForExtension Check in Checkstyle?

checkstyle

Related posts about checkstyle

Checkstyle: cannot summarise issues per author ?

Maven 2 checkstyle plugin version 2.5 - Problem with configLocation

Avoiding CheckStyle magic number errors in JDBC queries.

Allow single-line accessor (getter/setter) syntax with Checkstyle

Checkstyle for C#?

Categories cloud