HAProxy appsession vs cookie precedence
Posted
by
user1139473
on Server Fault
See other posts from Server Fault
or by user1139473
Published on 2013-11-05T20:59:39Z
Indexed on
2013/11/05
21:55 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 168
haproxy
I am trying to find the best solution for balancing and keeping persistence on our application behind HAProxy.
Here is our basic configuration: https://gist.github.com/endzyme/1804046b23c37beba520
After playing around with taking members down and up and also reloading the haproxy (with -sf) I have noticed that appsession isn't 100% effective, it would appear that sometimes it doesn't always 'request-learn'
. I also tried to add a cookie JSESSION prefix
to balance in case request-learn
didn't take.
Unfortunately it would present scenarios where the prefix would list svr2 but it was balanced to a different server. I am assuming it's because the appsession table takes first then sticks on that before using the cookie parameter. I have not tested with using cookie as an inserted option (not prefix on existing cookie) but I am thinking it would yield similar results.
My question is: Which one is checked first, appsession or cookie, and is it an immediate catch after it reads the first one, or a fall through? Also as a follow up - is it not recommended to use both in the same backend?
Cookie as I understand takes less memory resources, is agnostic to reloads and has way better reliability of persistence. Appsession I assume takes less cpu resource, since it's reading not writing.
(Bonus Question: is there a way to inspect appsession/cookie table map? socket> show table doesn't show anything except stick-tables)
Many thanks in advance,
-Nick
© Server Fault or respective owner