Why SQL functions are faster than UDF
Posted
by
Zerotoinfinite
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Zerotoinfinite
Published on 2013-11-09T22:53:49Z
Indexed on
2013/11/10
15:54 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 163
Though it's a quite subjective question but I feel it necessary to share on this forum.
I have personally experienced that when I create a UDF (even if that is not complex) and use it into my SQL it drastically decrease the performance. But when I use SQL inbuild function they happen to work pretty faster. Conversion , logical & string functions are clear example of that.
So, my question is "Why SQL in build functions are faster than UDF"? and it would be an advantage if someone can guide me how can I judge/manipulate function cost either mathematically or logically.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner