Why does Linq to Entity Sum return null when the list is empty?

Posted by Hannele on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by Hannele
Published on 2014-08-20T14:25:09Z Indexed on 2014/08/20 16:34 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 152

Filed under:

LINQ

There are quite a few questions on Stack Overflow about the Linq to Entity / Linq to SQL Sum extension method, about how it returns null when the result set is empty: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and many more, as well as a blog post discussing the issue here. Now, I could go a flag these as duplicates, but I feel it is still an inconsistency in the Linq implementation.

I am assuming at this point that it is not a bug, but is more or less working as designed. I understand that there are workarounds (for example, casting the field to a nullable type, so you can coalesce with ??), and I also understand that for the underlying SQL, a NULL result is expected for an empty list.

But because the result of the Sum extension for nullable types is also not nullable, why would the Linq to SQL / Linq to Entity Sum have been designed to behave this way?

Related posts about LINQ

LINQ to SQL, LINQ to XML and Accessing DataTable using LINQ

as seen on C# Corner - Search for 'C# Corner'
This article demonstrates how to use LINQ on DataTable, XML Data using LINQ to XML and SQL server data base using LINQ to SQL Classes. >>> More
Exception with Linq2SQL Query

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I am running a query using Linq2SQL that comes down to following query: DateTime? expiration = GetExpirationDate(); IQueryable<Persons> persons = GetPersons(); IQueryable<Items> subquery = from i in db.Items where i.ExpirationDate >= expiration … >>> More
What is Linq?

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
The way data can be retrieved in .NET. LINQ provides a uniform way to retrieve data from any object that implements the IEnumerable<T> interface. With LINQ, arrays, collections, relational data, and XML are all potential data sources. Why LINQ?With LINQ, you can use the same syntax to retrieve… >>> More
Mixing Silverlight-Specific System.Xml.Linq dll with Non-Silverlight System.Xml.Linq dll

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have a Logic layer that references Silverlight's System.Xml.Linq dll and a GUI that is in WPF (hence using the non-Silverlight System.Xml.Linq dll). When I attempt to pass an XElement from GUI project to a method in the Logic project, I am getting (basically) "XElement is not of type XElement" errors… >>> More
Subsonic 3 LINQ vs LINQ to SQL

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I am using SQL Server 2005 in a project. I have to decide about datalayer. I would like to use LINQ in my project. I saw SubSonic 3 supporting LINQ and I also have option for LINQ to SQL, because i can have typed lists from LINQ to SQL. I am wondering what is different between LINQ to SQL and… >>> More

Developer IT