Linux servers vs Windows IIS sense of usage "free" solutions

Posted by Rob on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Rob
Published on 2014-08-25T09:02:37Z Indexed on 2014/08/25 10:21 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 278

Filed under:
|
|

I wonder what is the sense of using "free" open source solutions for serious webstie applications? Crawled and read many testing of servers performance and there is one conclusion: IIS seems to be the best choice for high load applicatiom. I mean cost effective. Especially this concers to Nginx PLUS and LiteSpeed Users where subscriptions paid for e.g. LoadBalacer and extra support cost a lot in fact.

I'm asking then where it's "free" then or "cheap" in this case? Assuming even little higher cost of dedicated servers with Windows still seems like Windows looks cheaper. At it's basic setup Windows 2012 with IIS offer much more than std LAMP, or other NGINX config....

Maybe am I missing sth ? I mean only general case for someone who did not already started his app. I know exactly that the cheapest solution is the one someone is skilled.

Has anyone done already such real costs calculation for example scenarios?

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about apache-2.2

Related posts about nginx