Search Results

Search found 3 results on 1 pages for 'antoon groenewoud'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

• VSC++, virtual method at bad adress, curious bug

  - by antoon.groenewoud

  Hello, This guy: virtual phTreeClass* GetTreeClass() const { return (phTreeClass*)m_entity_class; } When called, crashed the program with an access violation, even after a full recompile. All member functions and virtual member functions had correct memory adresses (I hovered mouse over the methods in debug mode), but this function had a bad memory adress: 0xfffffffc. Everything looked okay: the 'this' pointer, and everything works fine up until this function call. This function is also pretty old and I didn't change it for a long time. The problem just suddenly popped up after some work, which I commented all out to see what was doing it, without any success. So I removed the virtual, compiled, and it works fine. I add virtual, compiled, and it still works fine! I basically changed nothing, and remember that I did do a full recompile earlier, and still had the error back then. I wasn't able to reproduce the problem. But now it is back. I didn't change anything. Removing virtual fixes the problem. Sincerely, Antoon

  Read the article

• I cannot update my version 12-04. After installation of 12.04 I get only error reports when I try to update

  - by cees groenewoud

  received report: from Google translate : Could not initialize the package information There was an insoluble problem occurred while initializing the package information. Please this error in the package "update-manager" to report and add the following message to: 'E: Encountered a section with no Package: header E: Problem with Merge List / var/lib/apt/lists/nl.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_i18n_Translation-en, E: The package lists or status file could not decompose or not be opened. " Kon de pakketinformatie niet initialiseren Er heeft zich een onoplosbaar probleem voorgedaan bij het initialiseren van de pakketinformatie. Gelieve deze fout in het pakket ‘update-manager’ te rapporteren en voeg de volgende foutmelding toe: 'E:Encountered a section with no Package: header, E:Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/nl.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_i18n_Translation-en, E:De pakketlijsten of het statusbestand konden of niet ontleed, of niet geopend worden.'

  Read the article

• Why do C# automatic properties not support default values like VB 2010?

  - by Rob van Groenewoud

  Looking at the new VB 2010 features, I stumbled upon support for Auto-Implemented Properties. Since I'm working with C#, this seemed quite familiar, but I noticed that VB did add a feature I would love to have in C#: setting a arbitrary default value for the auto-implemented property: I really like the clean usage of auto-properties in C#. This would save us the effort of introducing a backing field and hooking it up to the property everytime we simply need a default value, thereby cluttering up the code unnecessarily. I was wondering why this wasn't introduced in C# as well? What could be the rationale for not doing this? Is a syntax discussion going on, or are there technical limitations to implementing this?

  Read the article

1