Search Results

Search found 6 results on 1 pages for 'boyan'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

• Algorithm for finding the smallest power of two that's greater or equal to a given value

  - by Boyan

  I need to find the smallest power of two that's greater or equal to a given value. So far, I have this: int value = 3221; // 3221 is just an example, could be any number int result = 1; while (result < value) result <<= 1; It works fine, but feels kind of naive. Is there a better algorithm for that problem? EDIT. There were some nice Assembler suggestions, so I'm adding those tags to the question.

  Read the article

• remove multiple training slashes mod_rewrite

  - by Boyan

  I know this question was asked a number of times on this site alone, but browsing through the relevant posts I couldn't find a solution. Trying to remove multiple trailing slashes after domain. The following mod_rewrite expressions seem to work for URLs such as http://www.domain.com//path1///path2////, but do not work for domain// DirectorySlash Off RewriteEngine on # Canonical fix RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.domain.com$ [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com/$1 [R=301] RewriteRule ^/main.do http://www.domain.com/ [R=301,L] RewriteRule ^/index.jsp http://www.domain.com/ [R=301,L] # Remove bogus query strings RewriteCond %{query_string} q= [NC] RewriteRule (.*) http://www.domain.com/$1? [R=301,L] # Remove multiple slashes after domain - DOESN'T WORK!!! #RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^//+(.*)$ [OR] #RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^(.*/)/+$ #RewriteRule / http://www.domain.com/%1 [R=301,L] # Remove multiple slashes anywhere in URL RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^(.*)//(.*)$ RewriteRule . %1/%2 [R=301,L] # Externally redirect to get rid of trailing slash except for home page, ads RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/ads/ RewriteRule ^(.+)/$ $1 [R=301,L] Your help is appreciated.

  Read the article

• remove multiple trailing slashes mod_rewrite

  - by Boyan

  I know this question was asked a number of times on this site alone, but browsing through the relevant posts I couldn't find a solution. Trying to remove multiple trailing slashes after domain. The following mod_rewrite expressions seem to work for URLs such as http://www.domain.com//path1///path2////, but do not work for domain// DirectorySlash Off RewriteEngine on # Canonical fix RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.domain.com$ [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com/$1 [R=301] RewriteRule ^/main.do http://www.domain.com/ [R=301,L] RewriteRule ^/index.jsp http://www.domain.com/ [R=301,L] # Remove bogus query strings RewriteCond %{query_string} q= [NC] RewriteRule (.*) http://www.domain.com/$1? [R=301,L] # Remove multiple slashes after domain - DOESN'T WORK!!! #RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^//+(.*)$ [OR] #RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^(.*/)/+$ #RewriteRule / http://www.domain.com/%1 [R=301,L] # Remove multiple slashes anywhere in URL RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^(.*)//(.*)$ RewriteRule . %1/%2 [R=301,L] # Externally redirect to get rid of trailing slash except for home page, ads RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/ads/ RewriteRule ^(.+)/$ $1 [R=301,L] Your help is appreciated.

  Read the article

• MySQL Cluster data nodes - slow SELECTs

  - by Boyan Georgiev

  Hi to all. First off, I'm new to MySQL Cluster. This is my pain: I've managed to setup a MySQL Cluster with two data nodes, two SQL nodes and one management server. Everything works pretty well, except the following: my data nodes are spread across an intranet link which incurs latency into communications between the data nodes. Apparently, due to MySQL Cluster's internal partitioning schemes, when my PHP application pulls data from the cluster via SELECT queries, parts of the data are pulled from both data nodes. This makes the page appear onscreen REALLY slowly. If I bring one data node offline, the data can only be pulled from that single remaining data node, and thus, the final result (HTML output) appears on the screen in a very timely fashion. So, my question is this: can the data nodes/cluster be told to pull data from partitions stored only on a particular data node?

  Read the article

• How to get the row and column of button clicked, in the grid event handler?

  - by younevertell

  Once the added button in grid is clicked, how to find which row and column the button is located in the grid event handler, like click event or some other events? Not the button click event handler #region Grid event handler setup myGrid.MouseEnter += new MouseEventHandler(myGrid_MouseEnter); myGrid.MouseLeave += new MouseEventHandler(myGrid_MouseLeave); myGrid.MouseDown += new MouseButtonEventHandler(myGrid_MouseDown); myGrid.MouseUp += new MouseButtonEventHandler(myGrid_MouseUp); #endregion Thanks I notice that Boyan has some solution for the button click event handler case http://stackoverflow.com/questions/363100/in-wpf-how-can-i-determine-what-column-row-in-a-grid-a-control-is In the Click event handler for the button you say: int row; Button btn = sender as Button; if (btn != null) { row = Grid.GetRow(btn); // And you have the row number... } else { // A nasty error occurred... }

  Read the article

• Poll Results: Foreign Key Constraints

  - by Darren Gosbell

  A few weeks ago I did the following post asking people – if they used foreign key constraints in their star schemas. The poll is still open if you are interested in adding to it, but here is what the chart looks like as of today. (at the bottom of the poll itself there is a link to the live results, unfortunately I cannot link the live results in here as the blogging platform blocks the required javascript)   Interestingly the results are fairly even. Of the 78 respondents, fractionally over half at least aim to start with referential integrity in their star schemas. I did not want to influence the results by sharing my opinion, but my personal preference is to always aim to have foreign key constraints. But at the same time, I am pragmatic about it, I do have projects where for various reasons some constraints are not defined. And I also have other designs that I have inherited, where it would just be too much work to go back and add foreign key constraints. If you are going to implement foreign keys in your star schema, they really need to be there at the start. In fact this poll was was the result of a feature request for BIDSHelper asking for a feature to check for null/missing foreign keys and I am entirely convinced that BIDS is the wrong place for this sort of functionality. BIDS is a design tool, your data needs to be constantly checked for consistency. It's not that I think that it's impossible to get a design working without foreign key constraints, but I like the idea of failing as soon as possible if there is an error and enforcing foreign key constraints lets me "fail early" if there are constancy issues with my data. By far the biggest concern with foreign keys is performance and I suppose I'm curious as to how often people actually measure and quantify this. I worked on a project a number of years ago that had very large data volumes and we did find that foreign key constraints did have a measurable impact, but what we did was to disable the constraints before loading the data, then enabled and checked them afterwards. This saved as time (although not as much as not having constraints at all), but still let us know early in the process if there were any consistency issues. For the people that do not have consistent data, if you have ETL processes that you control that are building your star schema which you also control, then to be blunt you only have yourself to blame. It is the job of the ETL process to make the data consistent. There are techniques for handling situations like missing data as well as  early and late arriving data. Ralph Kimball's book – The Data Warehouse Toolkit goes through some design patterns for handling data consistency. Having foreign key relationships can also help the relational engine to optimize queries as noted in this recent blog post by Boyan Penev

  Read the article

1