Search Results

Search found 5 results on 1 pages for 'buttercup'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

  • Do I need more RAM for programming if I switch to a 64 Bit OS?

    - by Buttercup
    Hi, Given that today (for performance reasons?) variables are usually aligned to the "bit-width" (I wanted to use "word-width" here, but on x86 a "word" is still 16 bits right?) of the processor, would switching from a 32 bit OS to its 64 bit version double the RAM usage? Would this then in turn mean that to do the same work a 32 bit OS can do with 4 GB RAM (well, the 3.x GB actually...) with a 64 bit OS I would need 8 GB of RAM for programming? Please note that I'm only talking about everyday x86 computers here.

    Read the article

  • Use concat and maintain length of variable

    - by user1682055
    I'm trying to use concat on some variables. These variables have been declared as chars: declare v_order_date char(10); declare v_quantity char(11); declare v_plant char(100); I have a cursor where I am setting these as some outputs. To call the results, I am setting v_msg as set v_msg := concat( v_msg, '\n', v_order_date, v_quantity, v_plant); However, the result I am getting when I select v_msg is: 2012-01-222501008 Creeping Buttercup but I want to maintain the length of the declared variables in my select that looks like this 2012-01-22 250 1008 Creeping Buttercup Are there any suggestions? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • I don't get this C/C++ Joke

    - by Buttercup
    After reading this article on thedailywtf.com, I'm not sure that I really got the joke. It says there that some guy changed the code from int function() { int x; char data_string[15]; ... x = 2; strcpy(data_string,"data data data"); ... } to int function() { int x = 2; char data_string[15] = "data data data"; ... } everywhere in the code and that for some reason did inflate the size of the executable from 1 to 2 CDs (or maybe it didn't do that?). Obviously I'm not familiar enough with C/C++ to get this joke, but what seems strangest is that the 2nd code listing seems "cleaner"—at least from what I've been told in school (that is that initializing variables is a good thing, not a bad one).

    Read the article

  • CSplitterWnd flip between horizonal and vertical splitter?

    - by buttercup
    Hi, Suppose I have a splitter with 2 rows. -------- |        | -------- |        | -------- How do I make it to this --------- |    |    | |    |    | |    |    | --------- switch from horizontal split to vertical split without having to re-create the whole splitter? Code is: if (!m_wndSplitter.CreateStatic(this, 1, 2, WS_CHILD|WS_VISIBLE)) { TRACE0("Failed to create splitter window\n"); return FALSE; } if (!m_wndSplitter.CreateView(0, 1, RUNTIME_CLASS(CWnd), CSize(200, 100), NULL)) { TRACE0("Failed to create CView1\n"); return FALSE; } if (!m_wndSplitter.CreateView(0, 2, RUNTIME_CLASS(CWnd), CSize(500, 100), NULL)) { TRACE0("Failed to create CView2\n"); return FALSE; }

    Read the article

1