Search Results

Search found 1526 results on 62 pages for 'don jones'.

Page 1/62 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Chuck Jones Shows How to Draw Bugs Bunny [Video]

    - by Asian Angel
    Is drawing one of your passions and/or hobbies? Are you a fan of the classic Bugs Bunny cartoons? Then you will certainly enjoy this delightful video where Chuck Jones shows you how to draw Bugs Bunny! Chuck Jones shows how to draw Bugs Bunny [via Neatorama] How to Make Your Laptop Choose a Wired Connection Instead of Wireless HTG Explains: What Is Two-Factor Authentication and Should I Be Using It? HTG Explains: What Is Windows RT and What Does It Mean To Me?

    Read the article

  • How can I split Excel data from one row into multiple rows

    - by Lenny
    Good afternoon, Is there a way to split data from one row and store to separate rows? I have a large file that contains scheduling information and I'm trying to develop a list that comprises each combination of course, day, term and period per line. For example I have a file similiar to this: Crs:Sn Title Tchr TchrName Room Days Terms Periods 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 M,T,W,R,F 3,4 2,3 1034:02 English II 123 MOORE 352 M,T,W,R,F 3 4 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 M,T,W,R,F 3,4 3,4 0180:06 Pub Speaking 23 ROSEN 228 M,T,W,R,F 3,4 5 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 M,T,W,R,F 1,2,3 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 M,T,W,R,F 1,2,3,4 2,3 Should extract to this in an excel file: Crs:Sn Title Tchr# Tchr Room Days Terms Period 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 M 3 2 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 T 3 2 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 W 3 2 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 R 3 2 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 F 3 2 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 M 4 2 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 T 4 2 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 W 4 2 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 R 4 2 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 F 4 2 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 M 3 3 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 T 3 3 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 W 3 3 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 R 3 3 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 F 3 3 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 M 4 3 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 T 4 3 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 W 4 3 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 R 4 3 7014:01 English I 678 JUNG 300 F 4 3 1034:02 English II 123 MOORE 352 M 3 4 1034:02 English II 123 MOORE 352 T 3 4 1034:02 English II 123 MOORE 352 W 3 4 1034:02 English II 123 MOORE 352 R 3 4 1034:02 English II 123 MOORE 352 F 3 4 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 M 3 3 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 T 3 3 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 W 3 3 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 R 3 3 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 F 3 3 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 M 4 3 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 T 4 3 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 W 4 3 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 R 4 3 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 F 4 3 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 M 3 4 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 T 3 4 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 W 3 4 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 R 3 4 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 F 3 4 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 M 4 4 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 T 4 4 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 W 4 4 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 R 4 4 7144:02 Algebra 238 VYSOTSKY 352 F 4 4 0180:06 Pub Speaking 23 ROSEN 228 M 3 5 0180:06 Pub Speaking 23 ROSEN 228 T 3 5 0180:06 Pub Speaking 23 ROSEN 228 W 3 5 0180:06 Pub Speaking 23 ROSEN 228 R 3 5 0180:06 Pub Speaking 23 ROSEN 228 F 3 5 0180:06 Pub Speaking 23 ROSEN 228 M 4 5 0180:06 Pub Speaking 23 ROSEN 228 T 4 5 0180:06 Pub Speaking 23 ROSEN 228 W 4 5 0180:06 Pub Speaking 23 ROSEN 228 R 4 5 0180:06 Pub Speaking 23 ROSEN 228 F 4 5 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 M 1 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 M 2 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 M 3 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 T 1 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 T 2 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 T 3 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 W 1 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 W 2 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 W 3 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 R 1 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 R 2 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 R 3 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 F 1 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 F 2 3 7200:03 PE I 244 HARILAOU GYM 4 F 3 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 M 1 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 M 2 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 M 3 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 M 4 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 T 1 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 T 2 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 T 3 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 T 4 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 W 1 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 W 2 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 W 3 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 W 4 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 R 1 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 R 2 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 R 3 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 R 4 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 F 1 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 F 2 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 F 3 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 F 4 2 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 M 1 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 M 2 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 M 3 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 M 4 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 T 1 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 T 2 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 T 3 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 T 4 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 W 1 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 W 2 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 W 3 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 W 4 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 R 1 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 R 2 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 R 3 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 R 4 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 F 1 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 F 2 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 F 3 3 2101:01 Physics/Lab 441 JONES 348 F 4 3 I'm trying to avoid going line by line separating the data. I'm not well versed on the VBA functionality of Excel, but would like to get started using it. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Root Access: Don Dodge talks to 3 time founder Jennifer Reuting of DocRun

    Root Access: Don Dodge talks to 3 time founder Jennifer Reuting of DocRun Three time startup founder Jennifer Reuting, CEO of DocRun, and author of LLCs for Dummies, sits down with Don Dodge to talk startups. Jennifer started her first company at 17 from the ashes of a failed company. Jennifer is revolutionizing the legal docs business with DocRun. Inspiring interview. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 258 12 ratings Time: 44:37 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • Root Access: Don Dodge and Louis Gray on Entrepreneurs

    Root Access: Don Dodge and Louis Gray on Entrepreneurs Between them both, Don Dodge and Louis Gray have worked at the smallest of startups, raised VC rounds big and small, launched companies for the first time, and seen their share of successes and failures. Now at Google, they talk about some of the secret ingredients that make teams, ideas and companies work. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 0 0 ratings Time: 00:00 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • Root Access: Don Dodge and Jason Calacanis Talk Startups

    Root Access: Don Dodge and Jason Calacanis Talk Startups Google Developer Advocate Don Dodge sits down with Jason Calacanis, serial entrepreneur and founder of Mahalo and This Week In, talking startups, whether entrepreneurs are born or made, what motivates them and how to know when to pivot or persevere. Watch to find tips on raising capital and how to measure success. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 1 0 ratings Time: 38:18 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • Bill Gross of IdeaLab talks to Don Dodge about his incubator

    Bill Gross of IdeaLab talks to Don Dodge about his incubator Bill Gross has started nearly 100 companies, including Answers.com, CitySearch, Compete, eToys, GoTo.com, NetZero, Picasa, and Tickets.com. Thirty five of his companies have been acquired or gone public. IdeaLab currently has 25 companies active in the incubator. IdeaLab is a very different incubator. From: GoogleDevelopers Views: 492 23 ratings Time: 02:26 More in Science & Technology

    Read the article

  • [News] Interview de Don Syme, le cr?ateur de F#

    Nous avons plusieurs fois eu l'occasion de mentionner Don Syme sur DNG, notamment lors de son travail sur les g?n?rics dans C#. Responsable R&D chez MS Research ? Cambridge, il contribue d?sormais ? F# et r?pond ici ? une interview de Richard Morris. Tr?s int?ressant.

    Read the article

  • Tellago 2011: Dwight, Chris and Don are MVPs

    - by gsusx
    It’s been a great start of 2011. Tellago’s Dwight Goins has been awarded as a Microsoft BizTalk Server MVP for 2011. I’ve always said that Dwight should have been an MVP a long time ago. His contributions to the BizTalk Server community are nothing but remarkable. In addition to Dwight, my colleagues Don Demsak and Chris Love also renewed their respective MVP award. A few other of us are up for renewal later in the year. As a recognition to Dwight’s award, we have made him the designated doorman...(read more)

    Read the article

  • What I don’t like about WIF’s Claims-based Authorization

    - by Your DisplayName here!
    In my last post I wrote about what I like about WIF’s proposed approach to authorization – I also said that I definitely would build upon that infrastructure for my own systems. But implementing such a system is a little harder as it could be. Here’s why (and that’s purely my perspective): First of all WIF’s authorization comes in two “modes” Per-request authorization. When an ASP.NET/WCF request comes in, the registered authorization manager gets called. For SOAP the SOAP action gets passed in. For HTTP requests (ASP.NET, WCF REST) the URL and verb. Imperative authorization This happens when you explicitly call the claims authorization API from within your code. There you have full control over the values for action and resource. In ASP.NET per-request authorization is optional (depends on if you have added the ClaimsAuthorizationHttpModule). In WCF you always get the per-request checks as soon as you register the authorization manager in configuration. I personally prefer the imperative authorization because first of all I don’t believe in URL based authorization. Especially in the times of MVC and routing tables, URLs can be easily changed – but then you also have to adjust your authorization logic every time. Also – you typically need more knowledge than a simple “if user x is allowed to invoke operation x”. One problem I have is, both the per-request calls as well as the standard WIF imperative authorization APIs wrap actions and resources in the same claim type. This makes it hard to distinguish between the two authorization modes in your authorization manager. But you typically need that feature to structure your authorization policy evaluation in a clean way. The second problem (which is somehow related to the first one) is the standard API for interacting with the claims authorization manager. The API comes as an attribute (ClaimsPrincipalPermissionAttribute) as well as a class to use programmatically (ClaimsPrincipalPermission). Both only allow to pass in simple strings (which results in the wrapping with standard claim types mentioned earlier). Both throw a SecurityException when the check fails. The attribute is a code access permission attribute (like PrincipalPermission). That means it will always be invoked regardless how you call the code. This may be exactly what you want, or not. In a unit testing situation (like an MVC controller) you typically want to test the logic in the function – not the security check. The good news is, the WIF API is flexible enough that you can build your own infrastructure around their core. For my own projects I implemented the following extensions: A way to invoke the registered claims authorization manager with more overloads, e.g. with different claim types or a complete AuthorizationContext. A new CAS attribute (with the same calling semantics as the built-in one) with custom claim types. A MVC authorization attribute with custom claim types. A way to use branching – as opposed to catching a SecurityException. I will post the code for these various extensions here – so stay tuned.

    Read the article

  • Don’t break that sandbox

    - by Sahil Malik
    SharePoint 2010 Training: more information Hmm .. I hear that some soldiers are spreading rumors that it is OKAY to edit the WSS_Sandbox trust level inside of SharePoint. Afterall, it is just .NET code right? And it’s just a CAS policy, so why not make that tempting little tweet, and well – all I wanna do is call web services! Ummmm ..   DON’T DO IT!   Yes I know it’s just .NET code! But Microsoft has spent a great deal of time, resources, and thoughts in crafting up the boundary of what a sandbox solution can do, and what it cannot do. Soon as you make that tiny little tweak to allow calling web services, you just opened a bunch of security holes in your SharePoint installation. Not to mention, you broke the first cardinal rule of your SharePoint solutions, which is, “No Microsoft files were hurt in the building of this solution” Read full article ....

    Read the article

  • Don’t Kill the Password

    - by Anthony Trudeau
    A week ago Mr. Honan from Wired.com penned an article on security he titled “Kill the Password: Why a String of Characters Can’t Protect Us Anymore.” He asserts that the password is not effective and a new solution is needed. Unfortunately, Mr. Honan was a victim of hacking. As a result he has a victim’s vendetta. His conclusion is ill conceived even though there are smatterings of truth and good advice. The password is a security barrier much like a lock on your door. In of itself it’s not guaranteeing protection. You can have a good password akin to a steel reinforced door with the best lock money can buy, or you can have a poor password like “password” which is like a sliding lock like on a bathroom stall. But, just like in the real world a lock isn’t always enough. You can have a lock, security system, video cameras, guard dogs, and even armed security guards; but none of that guarantees your protection. Even top secret government agencies can be breached by someone who is just that good (as dramatized in movies like Mission Impossible). And that’s the crux of it. There are real hackers out there that are that good. Killer coding ninja monkeys do exist! We still have locks on our doors, because they still serve their role. Passwords are no different. Security doesn’t end with the password. Most people would agree that stuffing your mattress with your life savings isn’t a good idea even if you have the best locks and security system. Most people agree its safest to have the money in a bank. Essentially this is compartmentalization. Compartmentalization extends to the online world as well. You’re at risk if your online banking accounts are linked to the same account as your social networks. This is especially true if you’re lackadaisical about linking those social networks to outside sources including apps. The object here is to minimize the damage that can be done. An attacker should not be able to get into your bank account, because they breached your Twitter account. It’s time to prioritize once you’ve compartmentalized. This simply means deciding how much security you want for the different compartments which I’ll call security zones. Social networking applications like Facebook provide a lot of security features. However, security features are almost always a compromise with privacy and convenience. It’s similar to an engineering adage, but in this case it’s security, convenience, and privacy – pick two. For example, you might use a safe instead of bank to store your money, because the convenience of having your money closer or the privacy of not having the bank records is more important than the added security. The following are lists of security do’s and don’ts (these aren’t meant to be exhaustive and each could be an article in of themselves): Security Do’s: Use strong passwords based on a phrase Use encryption whenever you can (e.g. HTTPS in Facebook) Use a firewall (and learn to use it properly) Configure security on your router (including port blocking) Keep your operating system patched Make routine backups of important files Realize that if you’re not paying for it, you’re the product Security Don’ts Link accounts if at all possible Reuse passwords across your security zones Use real answers for security questions (e.g. mother’s maiden name) Trust anything you download Ignore message boxes shown by your system or browser Forget to test your backups Share your primary email indiscriminately Only you can decide your comfort level between convenience, privacy, and security. Attackers are going to find exploits in software. Software is complex and depends on other software. The exploits are the responsibility of the software company. But your security is always your responsibility. Complete security is an illusion. But, there is plenty you can do to minimize the risk online just like you do in the physical world. Be safe and enjoy what the Internet has to offer. I expect passwords to be necessary just as long as locks.

    Read the article

  • 10 Do';s and Don';ts to Avoid SEO Mistakes

    With so much misinformation out there, along with a lack of knowledge about how SEO works, you could end up getting your website banned from the search engines. Learn how to avoid common mistakes wit... [Author: Debbie Everson - Web Design and Development - April 02, 2010]

    Read the article

  • The Latest Dish

    - by Oracle Staff
    Black Eyed Peas to Headline at Appreciation Event If you're coming to OpenWorld to fill up on the latest in IT solutions, be sure to save room for dessert. At the Oracle OpenWorld Appreciation Event, you'll be savoring the music of the world's hottest funk pop band, Black Eyed Peas, plus superstar rock legends Don Henley, of the Eagles, and Steve Miller. Save the date now: When: Wednesday, September 22, 8 p.m-12 a.m. Where: Treasure Island, San Francisco OpenWorld's annual thank-you event will be our most spectacular yet. Treasure Island, in the center of scenic San Francisco Bay, will once again serve as a rockin' oasis for Oracle customers and partners as they groove to the beat and enjoy delicious food, drinks, and festivities. Get all the details here.

    Read the article

  • Watch Favorite Classic Movies in 16-Bit Animation Glory at PixelMash Theater

    - by Asian Angel
    Are you ready for a quick bit of retro fun? Then sit back and enjoy movie favorites like Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Back to the Future, and more in these condensed version 16-bit animated GIFs. Note: You can select your favorite movies from the list on the left side of the homepage. PixelMash Theater Homepage [via Neatorama] 7 Ways To Free Up Hard Disk Space On Windows HTG Explains: How System Restore Works in Windows HTG Explains: How Antivirus Software Works

    Read the article

  • "ldap_add: Naming violation (64)" error when configuring OpenLDAP

    - by user3215
    I am following the Ubuntu server guide to configure OpenLDAP on an Ubuntu 10.04 server, but can not get it to work. When I try to use sudo ldapadd -x -D cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com -W -f frontend.ldif I'm getting the following error: Enter LDAP Password: <entered 'secret' as password> adding new entry "dc=don,dc=com" ldap_add: Naming violation (64) additional info: value of single-valued naming attribute 'dc' conflicts with value present in entry Again when I try to do the same, I'm getting the following error: root@avy-desktop:/home/avy# sudo ldapadd -x -D cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com -W -f frontend.ldif Enter LDAP Password: ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49) Here is the backend.ldif file: # Load dynamic backend modules dn: cn=module,cn=config objectClass: olcModuleList cn: module olcModulepath: /usr/lib/ldap olcModuleload: back_hdb # Database settings dn: olcDatabase=hdb,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig objectClass: olcHdbConfig olcDatabase: {1}hdb olcSuffix: dc=don,dc=com olcDbDirectory: /var/lib/ldap olcRootDN: cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com olcRootPW: secret olcDbConfig: set_cachesize 0 2097152 0 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_objects 1500 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_locks 1500 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_lockers 1500 olcDbIndex: objectClass eq olcLastMod: TRUE olcDbCheckpoint: 512 30 olcAccess: to attrs=userPassword by dn="cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com" write by anonymous auth by self write by * none olcAccess: to attrs=shadowLastChange by self write by * read olcAccess: to dn.base="" by * read olcAccess: to * by dn="cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com" write by * read frontend.ldif file: # Create top-level object in domain dn: dc=don,dc=com objectClass: top objectClass: dcObject objectclass: organization o: Example Organization dc: Example description: LDAP Example # Admin user. dn: cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: simpleSecurityObject objectClass: organizationalRole cn: admin description: LDAP administrator userPassword: secret dn: ou=people,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: organizationalUnit ou: people dn: ou=groups,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: organizationalUnit ou: groups dn: uid=john,ou=people,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: shadowAccount uid: john sn: Doe givenName: John cn: John Doe displayName: John Doe uidNumber: 1000 gidNumber: 10000 userPassword: password gecos: John Doe loginShell: /bin/bash homeDirectory: /home/john shadowExpire: -1 shadowFlag: 0 shadowWarning: 7 shadowMin: 8 shadowMax: 999999 shadowLastChange: 10877 mail: [email protected] postalCode: 31000 l: Toulouse o: Example mobile: +33 (0)6 xx xx xx xx homePhone: +33 (0)5 xx xx xx xx title: System Administrator postalAddress: initials: JD dn: cn=example,ou=groups,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: posixGroup cn: example gidNumber: 10000 Can anyone help me?

    Read the article

  • How to Configure OpenLDAP on Ubuntu 10.04 Server

    - by user3215
    I am following the Ubuntu server guide to configure OpenLDAP on an Ubuntu 10.04 server, but can not get it to work. When I try to use sudo ldapadd -x -D cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com -W -f frontend.ldif I'm getting the following error: Enter LDAP Password: <entered 'secret' as password> adding new entry "dc=don,dc=com" ldap_add: Naming violation (64) additional info: value of single-valued naming attribute 'dc' conflicts with value present in entry Again when I try to do the same, I'm getting the following error: root@avy-desktop:/home/avy# sudo ldapadd -x -D cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com -W -f frontend.ldif Enter LDAP Password: ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49) Here is the backend.ldif file: # Load dynamic backend modules dn: cn=module,cn=config objectClass: olcModuleList cn: module olcModulepath: /usr/lib/ldap olcModuleload: back_hdb # Database settings dn: olcDatabase=hdb,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig objectClass: olcHdbConfig olcDatabase: {1}hdb olcSuffix: dc=don,dc=com olcDbDirectory: /var/lib/ldap olcRootDN: cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com olcRootPW: secret olcDbConfig: set_cachesize 0 2097152 0 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_objects 1500 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_locks 1500 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_lockers 1500 olcDbIndex: objectClass eq olcLastMod: TRUE olcDbCheckpoint: 512 30 olcAccess: to attrs=userPassword by dn="cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com" write by anonymous auth by self write by * none olcAccess: to attrs=shadowLastChange by self write by * read olcAccess: to dn.base="" by * read olcAccess: to * by dn="cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com" write by * read frontend.ldif file: # Create top-level object in domain dn: dc=don,dc=com objectClass: top objectClass: dcObject objectclass: organization o: Example Organization dc: Example description: LDAP Example # Admin user. dn: cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: simpleSecurityObject objectClass: organizationalRole cn: admin description: LDAP administrator userPassword: secret dn: ou=people,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: organizationalUnit ou: people dn: ou=groups,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: organizationalUnit ou: groups dn: uid=john,ou=people,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: shadowAccount uid: john sn: Doe givenName: John cn: John Doe displayName: John Doe uidNumber: 1000 gidNumber: 10000 userPassword: password gecos: John Doe loginShell: /bin/bash homeDirectory: /home/john shadowExpire: -1 shadowFlag: 0 shadowWarning: 7 shadowMin: 8 shadowMax: 999999 shadowLastChange: 10877 mail: [email protected] postalCode: 31000 l: Toulouse o: Example mobile: +33 (0)6 xx xx xx xx homePhone: +33 (0)5 xx xx xx xx title: System Administrator postalAddress: initials: JD dn: cn=example,ou=groups,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: posixGroup cn: example gidNumber: 10000 Can anyone help me?

    Read the article

  • How to configure ldap on ubuntu 10.04 server

    - by user3215
    I am following the link to configure ldap on ubuntu 10.04 server but could not. when I try to use sudo ldapadd -x -D cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com -W -f frontend.ldif I'm getting the following error: Enter LDAP Password: <entered 'secret' as password> adding new entry "dc=don,dc=com" ldap_add: Naming violation (64) additional info: value of single-valued naming attribute 'dc' conflicts with value present in entry Again when I try to do the same, I'm getting the following error: root@avy-desktop:/home/avy# sudo ldapadd -x -D cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com -W -f frontend.ldif Enter LDAP Password: ldap_bind: Invalid credentials (49) Here is the backend.ldif file # Load dynamic backend modules dn: cn=module,cn=config objectClass: olcModuleList cn: module olcModulepath: /usr/lib/ldap olcModuleload: back_hdb # Database settings dn: olcDatabase=hdb,cn=config objectClass: olcDatabaseConfig objectClass: olcHdbConfig olcDatabase: {1}hdb olcSuffix: dc=don,dc=com olcDbDirectory: /var/lib/ldap olcRootDN: cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com olcRootPW: secret olcDbConfig: set_cachesize 0 2097152 0 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_objects 1500 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_locks 1500 olcDbConfig: set_lk_max_lockers 1500 olcDbIndex: objectClass eq olcLastMod: TRUE olcDbCheckpoint: 512 30 olcAccess: to attrs=userPassword by dn="cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com" write by anonymous auth by self write by * none olcAccess: to attrs=shadowLastChange by self write by * read olcAccess: to dn.base="" by * read olcAccess: to * by dn="cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com" write by * read frontend.ldif file: # Create top-level object in domain dn: dc=don,dc=com objectClass: top objectClass: dcObject objectclass: organization o: Example Organization dc: Example description: LDAP Example # Admin user. dn: cn=admin,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: simpleSecurityObject objectClass: organizationalRole cn: admin description: LDAP administrator userPassword: secret dn: ou=people,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: organizationalUnit ou: people dn: ou=groups,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: organizationalUnit ou: groups dn: uid=john,ou=people,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: inetOrgPerson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: shadowAccount uid: john sn: Doe givenName: John cn: John Doe displayName: John Doe uidNumber: 1000 gidNumber: 10000 userPassword: password gecos: John Doe loginShell: /bin/bash homeDirectory: /home/john shadowExpire: -1 shadowFlag: 0 shadowWarning: 7 shadowMin: 8 shadowMax: 999999 shadowLastChange: 10877 mail: [email protected] postalCode: 31000 l: Toulouse o: Example mobile: +33 (0)6 xx xx xx xx homePhone: +33 (0)5 xx xx xx xx title: System Administrator postalAddress: initials: JD dn: cn=example,ou=groups,dc=don,dc=com objectClass: posixGroup cn: example gidNumber: 10000 Anybody could help me?

    Read the article

  • Flex : Adobe veut faire don du SDK à l'open-source et crée la confusion dans sa communauté de développeurs

    Adobe veut faire don du SDK de Flex à l'open-source Et crée la confusion dans sa communauté de développeurs Le moins que l'on puisse dire est que la situation est confuse. Après avoir annoncé la fin de Flash dans l'univers des mobiles, Adobe vient de lancer une deuxième déclaration qui met ses développeurs en émoi : le SDK de Flex sera donné à la communauté open-source. Dans un premier temps, ce SDK sera confié à un organisme, baptisé Open Spoon Foundation, en partie chapeauté par Adobe. Le nom de cette fondation est un jeu de mot entre Spoon (cuillère) et Fork (fourchette), « fork » étant l'appellation usuelle pour des dé...

    Read the article

  • MVP Summit 2011 summary and thoughts: The &ldquo;I hope I don&rsquo;t cross a line and lose my MVP status&rdquo; post

    - by George Clingerman
    I've been wanting to write this post summarizing my thoughts about the MVP summit but have been dragging my feet since it's a very difficult one to write. However seeing Andy (http://forums.create.msdn.com/forums/t/77625.aspx) and Catalin (http://www.catalinzima.com/2011/03/mvp-summit-2011/) and Chris (http://geekswithblogs.net/cwilliams/archive/2011/03/07/144229.aspx) post about it has encouraged me to finally take the plunge. I'm going to have to write carefully though because I'm going to be dancing around a ton of NDA mine fields as well as having to walk the tight-rope of not sending the wrong message or having people read too much into what I'm saying. I want to note that most of what I'm about to say is just based on my observations, they're not thoughts that Microsoft has asked me to pass along and they're not things I heard Microsoft say. It's just me sharing what I think after going to the MVP summit. Let's start off with a short imaginary question and answer session.     Has the App Hub forums and XBLIG management been rather poor by Microsoft? Yes.     Do I think we're going to see changes to that overnight? No.     Will it continue to look bad from the outside? Somewhat. Confusing right? Well that's kind of how things are right now. Lots of confusion. XNA is doing AWESOME. Like, really, really awesome. As a result of that awesomeness, XNA is on three major platforms: Xbox 360, WP7 and PC. This means that internally Microsoft is really excited and invested in the technology. That's fantastic for XNA and really should show you the future the framework has. It's here to stay. So why are Xbox LIVE Indie Game developers feeling so much pain? The ironic thing is that pain is being caused by the success of XNA. When XNA was just a small thing, there was more freedom and more focus. It was just us and them. We were an only child. Now our family has grown and everyone has and wants some time with XNA. This gets XNA pulled in all directions and as it moves onto new platforms, it plays catch up trying to get those platforms up to speed to where Xbox LIVE Indie Games has grown. Forums, documentation, educational content. They all need to be there because Xbox LIVE Indie Games has all of that and more. Along with the catch up in features/documentation/awesomeness there's the catch up that the people on the team have to play. New platforms and new areas of development mean new players and those new guys don't have the history of being around from the beginning. This leads to a lack of understanding at times just how important some things are because they seem so small and insignificant (Rich Text defaulting for new forum profiles would be one things that jumps to mind). If you're not aware that the forums have become more than just a basic Q&A, if you're not aware that they're a central hub to a very active community, then you don't understand why that small change should be prioritized over something else. New people have to get caught up and figure out how to make a framework and central forum site work for everyone it's now serving. So yeah, a lot of our pain this last year has been simply that XNA is doing well and XBLIG is doing well so the focus was shifted to catch other things up. It hurts when a parent seems to not have any time for you and they're spending some much time with your new baby brother. Growing pains. All families and in our case our product family experience it to some degree. I think as WP7 matures we'll see the team figuring out how to give everyone the right amount of attention. While we're talking about some of our growing pains, it is also important to note (although not really an excuse) that the Xbox LIVE Arcade developers complain about many of the same things that we do. If you paid attention to talks and information coming out of GDC 2011, most of the the XBLA guys were saying things that sounded eerily similar to what the XBLIG developers are saying (Scott Nichols from GayGamer.net noticed http://twitter.com/#!/NaviFairyGG/status/43540379206811650). Does this mean we should just accept the status quo since we're being treated exactly the same? No way. However it DOES show that the way we're being treated is no indication of the stability and future of the platform, it's just Microsoft dropping the communication ball on two playing fields. We're not alone and we're not even being treated worse. Not great, but also in a weird way a very good sign. Now on to a few tidbits I think I CAN share from the summit (I'm really crossing my fingers I'm not stepping over some NDA line I shouldn't be). First, I discovered that the XBLIG user base is bigger than I personally had originally estimated. I won't give the exact numbers (although we did beg Microsoft to release some of these numbers so maybe someday?) but it was much larger than my original guestimates and I was pleasantly surprised. Maybe some of you guys had the right number when you were guessing, but I know that mine was much too low. And even MORE importantly the number of users/shoppers is growing at a steady pace as well. Our market is growing! That was fantastic news and really something that I had to share. On to the community manager discussion. It was mentioned. I was mentioned. I blushed. Nothing more to report there than the blush in my cheeks was a light crimson color. If I ever see a job description posted for that position I have a resume waiting in the wings. I can't deny that I think that would be my dream job... ...so after I finished blushing, the MVPs did make it very, very clear that the communication has to improve. Community manager or not the single biggest pain point with the Xbox LIVE Indie Game community has been a lack of communication. I have seen dramatic improvement in the team responding to MVPs and I'm even seeing more communication from them on the forums so I'm hoping that's a long term change. I really think they understood the issue, the problem remains how to open that communication channel in a way that was sustainable. I think they'll get it figured out and hopefully that's sooner rather than later. During the summit, you may have seen me tweeting about how I was "that guy" (http://twitter.com/#!/clingermangw/status/42740432471470081). You also may have noticed that Andy and Catalin both mentioned me in their summit write ups. I may have come on a bit strong while I was there...went a little out of character for myself. I've been agitated for a while with the way things have been and I've been listening to you guys and hearing you guys be agitated. I'm also watching some really awesome indie game developers looking elsewhere and leaving the platform. Some of them we might not have been able to keep even with changes, but others are only leaving because of perceptions and lack of communication from Microsoft. And that pisses me off. And I let Microsoft know that I was pissed off. You made your list and I took that list and verbalized it. I verbalized the hell out of it. [It was actually mentioned that I'm a lot nicer on the forums and in email than I am in person...I felt bad about that, but I couldn't stay silent]. Hopefully it did something guys, I really did try hard to get the message across. Along with my agitation, I also brought some pride. I mentioned several things in person to the team that I was particularly proud of. From people in the community that are doing an awesome job, to the re-launch of XboxIndies that was going on that week and even gamers like Steven Hurdle (http://writingsofmassdeduction.com/) who have purchased one XBLIG every day for over 100 days now. The community is freaking rocking it and I made sure to highlight that. So in conclusion, I'd just like to say hang in there (you know, like that picture of the cat). If you've been worried about investing in Xbox LIVE Indie Games because you think it's on shaky ground. It's not. Dream Build Play being about the Xbox 360 should have helped a little to point that out. The team is really scrambling around trying to figure things out and make improvements all around. There’s quite a few new gals and guys and it's going to take them time to catch up and there are a lot of constantly shifting priorities. We all have one toy, one team and we're fighting for time with it. It's also time for the community to continue spreading our wings and going out on our own more often. The Indie Game Winter Uprising was a fantastic example of that. We took things into our own hands and it got noticed and Microsoft got behind it. They do every time we stand up and do something (look at how many Microsoft employees tweeted, wrote about the re-launch of XboxIndies.com or the support I've gotten from them for my weekly XNA Notes). XNA is here to stay, it's time for us to stop being scared of that and figure out how to make our own games the successes they should be. There's definitely a list of things that need to be fixed, things that should be improved and I think we should definitely keep vocal about that with Microsoft. Keep it short, focused and prioritized. There's also a lot of things we can do ourselves while we're waiting on them to fix and change things. Lots of ways we can compensate for particular weaknesses in the channel. The kind of stuff that we can step up and do ourselves. Do it on our own, you know, the way Indies always do. And I'm really looking forward to watching us do just that.

    Read the article

  • Don&rsquo;t Forget! In-Memory Databases are Hot

    - by andrewbrust
    If you’re left scratching your head over SAP’s intention to acquire Sybase for almost $6 million, you’re not alone.  Despite Sybase’s 1990s reign as the supreme database standard in certain sectors (including Wall Street), the company’s flagship product has certainly fallen from grace.  Why would SAP pay a greater than 50% premium over Sybase’s closing price on the day of the announcement just to acquire a relational database which is firmly stuck in maintenance mode? Well there’s more to Sybase than the relational database product.  Take, for example, its mobile application platform.  It hit Gartner’s “Leaders’ Quadrant” in January of last year, and SAP needs a good mobile play.  Beyond the platform itself, Sybase has a slew of mobile services; click this link to look them over. There’s a second major asset that Sybase has though, and I wonder if it figured prominently into SAP’s bid: Sybase IQ.  Sybase IQ is a columnar database.  Columnar databases place values from a given database column contiguously, unlike conventional relational databases, which store all of a row’s data in close proximity.  Storing column values together works well in aggregation reporting scenarios, because the figures to be aggregated can be scanned in one efficient step.  It also makes for high rates of compression because values from a single column tend to be close to each other in magnitude and may contain long sequences of repeating values.  Highly compressible databases use much less disk storage and can be largely or wholly loaded into memory, resulting in lighting fast query performance.  For an ERP company like SAP, with its own legacy BI platform (SAP BW) and the entire range of Business Objects and Crystal Reports BI products (which it acquired in 2007) query performance is extremely important. And it’s a competitive necessity too.  QlikTech has built an entire company on a columnar, in-memory BI product (QlikView).  So too has startup company Vertica.  IBM’s TM1 product has been doing in-memory OLAP for years.  And guess who else has the in-memory religion?  Microsoft does, in the form of its new PowerPivot product.  I expect the technology in PowerPivot to become strategic to the full-blown SQL Server Analysis Services product and the entire Microsoft BI stack.  I sure don’t blame SAP for jumping on the in-memory bandwagon, if indeed the Sybase acquisition is, at least in part, motivated by that. It will be interesting to watch and see what SAP does with Sybase’s product line-up (assuming the acquisition closes), including the core database, the mobile platform, IQ, and even tools like PowerBuilder.  It is also fascinating to watch columnar’s encroachment on relational.  Perhaps this acquisition will be columnar’s tipping point and people will no longer see it as a fad.  Are you listening Larry Ellison?

    Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >