eicar test string - Developer IT

How to fix “Unit Test Runner failed to load test assembly”

- by ybbest

I encountered this issue a couple times during my recent project, every time I forgot what actually cause the issue. Therefore, I decide to write a quick blog post to make sure I can identify the issue quickly. Problem: Run unit test using a test runner and received a Unit Test Runner failed to load test assembly exception. Analysis: Basically, I have changed some code and start the test runner to run tests. The same dll have already been deployed to GAC. So the test runner actually tries to use the old version of the assembly thus could not load the assembly. Solution: Deploy the current version of dll to the GAC and re-run your test, it works like a charm.

Read the article

What is the difference between String and string in C#

- by SAMIR BHOGAYTA

string : ------ The string type represents a sequence of zero or more Unicode characters. string is an alias for String in the .NET Framework. 'string' is the intrinsic C# datatype, and is an alias for the system provided type "System.String". The C# specification states that as a matter of style the keyword ('string') is preferred over the full system type name (System.String, or String). Although string is a reference type, the equality operators (== and !=) are defined to compare the values of string objects, not references. This makes testing for string equality more intuitive. For example: String : ------ A String object is called immutable (read-only) because its value cannot be modified once it has been created. Methods that appear to modify a String object actually return a new String object that contains the modification. If it is necessary to modify the actual contents of a string-like object Difference between string & String : ---------- ------- ------ - ------ the string is usually used for declaration while String is used for accessing static string methods we can use 'string' do declare fields, properties etc that use the predefined type 'string', since the C# specification tells me this is good style. we can use 'String' to use system-defined methods, such as String.Compare etc. They are originally defined on 'System.String', not 'string'. 'string' is just an alias in this case. we can also use 'String' or 'System.Int32' when communicating with other system, especially if they are CLR-compliant. I.e. - if I get data from elsewhere, I'd deserialize it into a System.Int32 rather than an 'int', if the origin by definition was something else than a C# system.

Read the article

Split a long JSON string into lines in Ruby

- by David J.

Read the article

Should EICAR be updated to test the revision of Antivirus system?

- by makerofthings7

I'm posting this here since programmers write viruses, and AV software. They also have the best knowledge of heuristics and how AV systems work (cloaking etc). The EICAR test file was used to functionally test an antivirus system. As it stands today almost every AV system will flag EICAR as being a "test" virus. For more information on this historic test virus please click here. Currently the EICAR test file is only good for testing the presence of an AV solution, but it doesn't check for engine file or DAT file up-to-dateness. In other words, why do a functional test of a system that could have definition files that are more than 10 years old. With the increase of zero day threats it doesn't make much sense to functionally test your system using EICAR. That being said, I think EICAR needs to be updated/modified to be effective test that works in conjunction with an AV management solution. This question is about real world testing, without using live viruses... which is the intent of the original EICAR. That being said I'm proposing a new EICAR file format with the appendage of an XML blob that will conditionally cause the Antivirus engine to respond. X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-EXTENDED-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H* <?xml version="1.0"?> <engine-valid-from>2010-1-1Z</engine-valid-from> <signature-valid-from>2010-1-1Z</signature-valid-from> <authkey>MyTestKeyHere</authkey> In this sample, the antivirus engine would only alert on the EICAR file if both the signature or engine file is equal to or newer than the valid-from date. Also there is a passcode that will protect the usage of EICAR to the system administrator. If you have a backgound in "Test Driven Design" TDD for software you may get that all I'm doing is applying the principals of TDD to my infrastructure. Based on your experience and contacts how can I make this idea happen?

Read the article

Test Test Test Test [closed]

- by Test

:( Apparently I can't delete my own question, apologies. Flagged for moderator attention

Read the article

String.Empty in strings, need some explanation if possible :)

- by Pabuc

Hello all, 2 days ago, there was a question related to string.LastIndexOf(String.Empty) returning the last index of string. So I thought that; a string can always contain string.empty between characters like: "testing" == "t" + String.Empty + "e" + String.Empty +"sting" + String.Empty; After this, I wanted to test if String.IndexOf(String.Empty) was returning 0 because since String.Empty can be between any char in a string, that would be what I expect it to return and I wasn't wrong. string testString = "testing"; int index = testString.LastIndexOf(string.Empty); // index is 6 index = testString.IndexOf(string.Empty); // index is 0 It actually returned 0. I started to think that if I could split a string with String.Empty, I would get at least 2 string and those would be String.Empty and rest of the string since String.IndexOf(String.Empty) returned 0 and String.LastIndexOf(String.Empty) returned length of the string.. Here is what I coded: string emptyString = string.Empty; char[] emptyStringCharArr = emptyString.ToCharArray(); string myDummyString = "abcdefg"; string[] result = myDummyString.Split(emptyStringCharArr); The problem here is, I can't obviously convert String.Empty to char[] and result in an empty string[]. I would really love to see the result of this operation and the reason behind this. So my questions are: Is there any way to split a string with String.Empty? If it is not possible but in an absolute world which it would be possible, would it return an array full of chars like [0] = "t" [1] = "e" [2] = "s" and so on or would it just return the complete string? Which would make more sense and why? Thank you for your time.

Read the article

Test case as a function or test case as a class

- by GodMan

I am having a design problem in test automation:- Requirements - Need to test different servers (using unix console and not GUI) through automation framework. Tests which I'm going to run - Unit, System, Integration Question: While designing a test case, I am thinking that a Test Case should be a part of a test suite (test suite is a class), just as we have in Python's pyunit framework. But, should we keep test cases as functions for a scalable automation framework or should be keep test cases as separate classes(each having their own setup, run and teardown methods) ? From automation perspective, Is the idea of having a test case as a class more scalable, maintainable or as a function?

Read the article

How to get full query string parameters not UrlDecoded

- by developerit

Introduction While developing Developer IT’s website, we came across a problem when the user search keywords containing special character like the plus ‘+’ char. We found it while looking for C++ in our search engine. The request parameter output in ASP.NET was “c “. I found it strange that it removed the ‘++’ and replaced it with a space… Analysis After a bit of Googling and Reflection, it turns out that ASP.NET calls UrlDecode on each parameters retreived by the Request(“item”) method. The Request.Params property is affected by this two since it mashes all QueryString, Forms and other collections into a single one. Workaround Finally, I solve the puzzle usign the Request.RawUrl property and parsing it with the same RegEx I use in my url re-writter. The RawUrl not affected by anything. As its name say it, it’s raw. Published on http://www.developerit.com/

Read the article

[Visual Studio Extension Of The Day] Test Scribe for Visual Studio Ultimate 2010 and Test Professional 2010

- by Hosam Kamel

Test Scribe is a documentation power tool designed to construct documents directly from the TFS for test plan and test run artifacts for the purpose of discussion, reporting etc... . Known Issues/Limitations Customizing the generated report by changing the template, adding comments, including attachments etc… is not supported While opening a test plan summary document in Office 2007, if you get the warning: “The file Test Plan Summary cannot be opened because there are problems with the contents” (with Details: ‘The file is corrupt and cannot be opened’), click ‘OK’. Then, click ‘Yes’ to recover the contents of the document. This will then open the document in Office 2007. The same problem is not found in Office 2010. Generated documents are stored by default in the “My documents” folder. The output path of the generated report cannot be modified. Exporting word documents for individual test suites or test cases in a test plan is not supported. Download it from Visual Studio Extension Manager Originally posted at "Hosam Kamel| Developer & Platform Evangelist" http://blogs.msdn.com/hkamel

Read the article

Formatting a date string when the string sits inside another string

- by sf

Hi, I'm trying to figure out a way to format a date string that sits inside string using javascript. The string can be: "hello there From 2010-03-04 00:00:00.0 to 2010-03-31 00:00:00.0" or "stuff like 2010-03-04 20:00:00.0 and 2010-03-31 00:00:02.0 blah blah" I'd like it to end up like: "stuff like 4 March 2010 and 31 March 2010 blah blah" Does anyone have any idea as to how this could be achieved?

Read the article

Get Started using Build-Deploy-Test Workflow with TFS 2012

- by Jakob Ehn

TFS 2012 introduces a new type of Lab environment called Standard Environment. This allows you to setup a full Build Deploy Test (BDT) workflow that will build your application, deploy it to your target machine(s) and then run a set of tests on that server to verify the deployment. In TFS 2010, you had to use System Center Virtual Machine Manager and involve half of your IT department to get going. Now all you need is a server (virtual or physical) where you want to deploy and test your application. You don’t even have to install a test agent on the machine, TFS 2012 will do this for you! Although each step is rather simple, the entire process of setting it up consists of a bunch of steps. So I thought that it could be useful to run through a typical setup.I will also link to some good guidance from MSDN on each topic. High Level Steps Install and configure Visual Studio 2012 Test Controller on Target Server Create Standard Environment Create Test Plan with Test Case Run Test Case Create Coded UI Test from Test Case Associate Coded UI Test with Test Case Create Build Definition using LabDefaultTemplate 1. Install and Configure Visual Studio 2012 Test Controller on Target Server First of all, note that you do not have to have the Test Controller running on the target server. It can be running on another server, as long as the Test Agent can communicate with the test controller and the test controller can communicate with the TFS server. If you have several machines in your environment (web server, database server etc..), the test controller can be installed either on one of those machines or on a dedicated machine. To install the test controller, simply mount the Visual Studio Agents media on the server and browse to the vstf_controller.exe file located in the TestController folder. Run through the installation, you might need to reboot the server since it installs .NET 4.5. When the test controller is installed, the Test Controller configuration tool will launch automatically (if it doesn’t, you can start it from the Start menu). Here you will supply the credentials of the account running the test controller service. Note that this account will be given the necessary permissions in TFS during the configuration. Make sure that you have entered a valid account by pressing the Test link. Also, you have to register the test controller with the TFS collection where your test plan is located (and usually the code base of course) When you press Apply Settings, all the configuration will be done. You might get some warnings at the end, that might or might not cause a problem later. Be sure to read them carefully. For more information about configuring your test controllers, see Setting Up Test Controllers and Test Agents to Manage Tests with Visual Studio 2. Create Standard Environment Now you need to create a Lab environment in Microsoft Test Manager. Since we are using an existing physical or virtual machine we will create a Standard Environment. Open MTM and go to Lab Center. Click New to create a new environment Enter a name for the environment. Since this environment will only contain one machine, we will use the machine name for the environment (TargetServer in this case) On the next page, click Add to add a machine to the environment. Enter the name of the machine (TargetServer.Domain.Com), and give it the Web Server role. The name must be reachable both from your machine during configuration and from the TFS app tier server. You also need to supply an account that is a local administration on the target server. This is needed in order to automatically install a test agent later on the machine. On the next page, you can add tags to the machine. This is not needed in this scenario so go to the next page. Here you will specify which test controller to use and that you want to run UI tests on this environment. This will in result in a Test Agent being automatically installed and configured on the target server. The name of the machine where you installed the test controller should be available on the drop down list (TargetServer in this sample). If you can’t see it, you might have selected a different TFS project collection. Press Next twice and then Verify to verify all the settings: Press finish. This will now create and prepare the environment, which means that it will remote install a test agent on the machine. As part of this installation, the remote server will be restarted. 3-5. Create Test Plan, Run Test Case, Create Coded UI Test I will not cover step 3-5 here, there are plenty of information on how you create test plans and test cases and automate them using Coded UI Tests. In this example I have a test plan called My Application and it contains among other things a test suite called Automated Tests where I plan to put test cases that should be automated and executed as part of the BDT workflow. For more information about Coded UI Tests, see Verifying Code by Using Coded User Interface Tests 6. Associate Coded UI Test with Test Case OK, so now we want to automate our Coded UI Test and have it run as part of the BDT workflow. You might think that you coded UI test already is automated, but the meaning of the term here is that you link your coded UI Test to an existing Test Case, thereby making the Test Case automated. And the test case should be part of the test suite that we will run during the BDT. Open the solution that contains the coded UI test method. Open the Test Case work item that you want to automate. Go to the Associated Automation tab and click on the “…” button. Select the coded UI test that you corresponds to the test case: Press OK and the save the test case For more information about associating an automated test case with a test case, see How to: Associate an Automated Test with a Test Case 7. Create Build Definition using LabDefaultTemplate Now we are ready to create a build definition that will implement the full BDT workflow. For this purpose we will use the LabDefaultTemplate.11.xaml that comes out of the box in TFS 2012. This build process template lets you take the output of another build and deploy it to each target machine. Since the deployment process will be running on the target server, you will have less problem with permissions and firewalls than if you were to remote deploy your solution. So, before creating a BDT workflow build definition, make sure that you have an existing build definition that produces a release build of your application. Go to the Builds hub in Team Explorer and select New Build Definition Give the build definition a meaningful name, here I called it MyApplication.Deploy Set the trigger to Manual Define a workspace for the build definition. Note that a BDT build doesn’t really need a workspace, since all it does is to launch another build definition and deploy the output of that build. But TFS doesn’t allow you to save a build definition without adding at least one mapping. On Build Defaults, select the build controller. Since this build actually won’t produce any output, you can select the “This build does not copy output files to a drop folder” option. On the process tab, select the LabDefaultTemplate.11.xaml. This is usually located at $/TeamProject/BuildProcessTemplates/LabDefaultTemplate.11.xaml. To configure it, press the … button on the Lab Process Settings property First, select the environment that you created before: Select which build that you want to deploy and test. The “Select an existing build” option is very useful when developing the BDT workflow, because you do not have to run through the target build every time, instead it will basically just run through the deployment and test steps which speeds up the process. Here I have selected to queue a new build of the MyApplication.Test build definition On the deploy tab, you need to specify how the application should be installed on the target server. You can supply a list of deployment scripts with arguments that will be executed on the target server. In this example I execute the generated web deploy command file to deploy the solution. If you for example have databases you can use sqlpackage.exe to deploy the database. If you are producing MSI installers in your build, you can run them using msiexec.exe and so on. A good practice is to create a batch file that contain the entire deployment that you can run both locally and on the target server. Then you would just execute the deployment batch file here in one single step. The workflow defines some variables that are useful when running the deployments. These variables are: $(BuildLocation) The full path to where your build files are located $(InternalComputerName_<VM Name>) The computer name for a virtual machine in a SCVMM environment $(ComputerName_<VM Name>) The fully qualified domain name of the virtual machine As you can see, I specify the path to the myapplication.deploy.cmd file using the $(BuildLocation) variable, which is the drop folder of the MyApplication.Test build. Note: The test agent account must have read permission in this drop location. You can find more information here on Building your Deployment Scripts On the last tab, we specify which tests to run after deployment. Here I select the test plan and the Automated Tests test suite that we saw before: Note that I also selected the automated test settings (called TargetServer in this case) that I have defined for my test plan. In here I define what data that should be collected as part of the test run. For more information about test settings, see Specifying Test Settings for Microsoft Test Manager Tests We are done! Queue your BDT build and wait for it to finish. If the build succeeds, your build summary should look something like this:

Read the article

vb.net string concatenation string + function output + string = string + function output and no more

- by Barfieldmv

The following output produces a string with no closing xml tag. m_rFlight.Layout = m_rFlight.Layout + "<G3Grid:Spots>" + Me.gvwSpots.LayoutToString() + "</G3Grid:Spots>" This following code works correctly m_rFlight.Layout = m_rFlight.Layout + "<G3Grid:Spots>" + Me.gvwSpots.LayoutToString() m_rFlight.Layout = m_rFlight.Layout + "</G3Grid:Spots>" 'add closing tag What's going on here, what's the reason the first example isnt working and the second is? The gvwSpots.LayoutToString() function returns a string.

Read the article

Remove accents from String .NET

- by developerit

Private Const ACCENT As String = “ÀÁÂÃÄÅàáâãäåÒÓÔÕÖØòóôõöøÈÉÊËèéêëÌÍÎÏìíîïÙÚÛÜùúûüÿÑñÇç” Private Const SANSACCENT As String = “AAAAAAaaaaaaOOOOOOooooooEEEEeeeeIIIIiiiiUUUUuuuuyNnCc” Public Shared Function FormatForUrl(ByVal uriBase As String) As String If String.IsNullOrEmpty(uriBase) Then Return uriBase End If ‘// Declaration de variables Dim chaine As String = uriBase.Trim.Replace(” “, “-”) chaine = chaine.Replace(” “c, “-”c) chaine = chaine.Replace(“–”, “-”) chaine = chaine.Replace(“‘”c, String.Empty) chaine = chaine.Replace(“?”c, String.Empty) chaine = chaine.Replace(“#”c, String.Empty) chaine = chaine.Replace(“:”c, String.Empty) chaine = chaine.Replace(“;”c, String.Empty) ‘// Conversion des chaines en tableaux de caractŠres Dim tableauSansAccent As Char() = SANSACCENT.ToCharArray Dim tableauAccent As Char() = ACCENT.ToCharArray ‘// Pour chaque accent For i As Integer = 0 To ACCENT.Length – 1 ‘ // Remplacement de l’accent par son ‚quivalent sans accent dans la chaŒne de caractŠres chaine = chaine.Replace(tableauAccent(i).ToString(), tableauSansAccent(i).ToString()) Next ‘// Retour du resultat Return chaine End Function

Read the article

BAD DC transfering FSMO Roles to ADC

- by Suleman

I have a DC (FQDN:server.icmcpk.local) and an ADC (FQDN:file-server.icmcpk.local). Recently my DC is facing a bad sector problem so I changed the Operation Masters to file-server for all five roles. but when ever i turn off the OLD DC the file-server also stops wroking with AD and GPMC further i m also unable to join any other computer to this domain. For Test purpose i also added a new ADC (FQDN:wds-server.icmcpk.local) but no succes with the old DC off i had to turn the old DC on and then joined it. I m attaching the Dcdiags for all three servers. Kindly help me so that i b able to reinstall new HDD and it can go online again. --------------------------------------- Server --------------------------------------- C:\Program Files\Support Tools>dcdiag Domain Controller Diagnosis Performing initial setup: Done gathering initial info. Doing initial required tests Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\SERVER Starting test: Connectivity ......................... SERVER passed test Connectivity Doing primary tests Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\SERVER Starting test: Replications [Replications Check,SERVER] A recent replication attempt failed: From FILE-SERVER to SERVER Naming Context: DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=icmcpk,DC=local The replication generated an error (1908): Could not find the domain controller for this domain. The failure occurred at 2012-05-04 14:07:13. The last success occurred at 2012-05-04 13:48:39. 1 failures have occurred since the last success. Kerberos Error. A KDC was not found to authenticate the call. Check that sufficient domain controllers are available. [Replications Check,SERVER] A recent replication attempt failed: From WDS-SERVER to SERVER Naming Context: DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=icmcpk,DC=local The replication generated an error (1908): Could not find the domain controller for this domain. The failure occurred at 2012-05-04 14:07:13. The last success occurred at 2012-05-04 13:48:39. 1 failures have occurred since the last success. Kerberos Error. A KDC was not found to authenticate the call. Check that sufficient domain controllers are available. [Replications Check,SERVER] A recent replication attempt failed: From FILE-SERVER to SERVER Naming Context: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=icmcpk,DC=local The replication generated an error (1908): Could not find the domain controller for this domain. The failure occurred at 2012-05-04 14:07:13. The last success occurred at 2012-05-04 13:48:39. 1 failures have occurred since the last success. Kerberos Error. A KDC was not found to authenticate the call. Check that sufficient domain controllers are available. [Replications Check,SERVER] A recent replication attempt failed: From WDS-SERVER to SERVER Naming Context: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=icmcpk,DC=local The replication generated an error (1908): Could not find the domain controller for this domain. The failure occurred at 2012-05-04 14:07:13. The last success occurred at 2012-05-04 13:48:39. 1 failures have occurred since the last success. Kerberos Error. A KDC was not found to authenticate the call. Check that sufficient domain controllers are available. [Replications Check,SERVER] A recent replication attempt failed: From FILE-SERVER to SERVER Naming Context: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=icmcpk,DC=local The replication generated an error (1908): Could not find the domain controller for this domain. The failure occurred at 2012-05-04 14:07:13. The last success occurred at 2012-05-04 13:48:39. 1 failures have occurred since the last success. Kerberos Error. A KDC was not found to authenticate the call. Check that sufficient domain controllers are available. [Replications Check,SERVER] A recent replication attempt failed: From WDS-SERVER to SERVER Naming Context: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=icmcpk,DC=local The replication generated an error (1908): Could not find the domain controller for this domain. The failure occurred at 2012-05-04 14:07:13. The last success occurred at 2012-05-04 13:48:39. 1 failures have occurred since the last success. Kerberos Error. A KDC was not found to authenticate the call. Check that sufficient domain controllers are available. [Replications Check,SERVER] A recent replication attempt failed: From WDS-SERVER to SERVER Naming Context: DC=icmcpk,DC=local The replication generated an error (1908): Could not find the domain controller for this domain. The failure occurred at 2012-05-04 14:07:13. The last success occurred at 2012-05-04 13:48:39. 1 failures have occurred since the last success. Kerberos Error. A KDC was not found to authenticate the call. Check that sufficient domain controllers are available. ......................... SERVER passed test Replications Starting test: NCSecDesc ......................... SERVER passed test NCSecDesc Starting test: NetLogons ......................... SERVER passed test NetLogons Starting test: Advertising ......................... SERVER passed test Advertising Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders ......................... SERVER passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders Starting test: RidManager ......................... SERVER passed test RidManager Starting test: MachineAccount ......................... SERVER passed test MachineAccount Starting test: Services ......................... SERVER passed test Services Starting test: ObjectsReplicated ......................... SERVER passed test ObjectsReplicated Starting test: frssysvol ......................... SERVER passed test frssysvol Starting test: frsevent There are warning or error events within the last 24 hours after the SYSVOL has been shared. Failing SYSVOL replication problems may cause Group Policy problems. ......................... SERVER failed test frsevent Starting test: kccevent ......................... SERVER passed test kccevent Starting test: systemlog An Error Event occured. EventID: 0x80001778 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:05:39 Event String: The previous system shutdown at 1:26:31 PM on An Error Event occured. EventID: 0x825A0011 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:07:45 (Event String could not be retrieved) An Error Event occured. EventID: 0x00000457 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:13:40 (Event String could not be retrieved) An Error Event occured. EventID: 0x00000457 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:14:25 (Event String could not be retrieved) An Error Event occured. EventID: 0x00000457 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:14:25 (Event String could not be retrieved) An Error Event occured. EventID: 0x00000457 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:14:38 (Event String could not be retrieved) An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC1010020 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:16:14 Event String: Dependent Assembly Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC could An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC101003B Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:16:14 Event String: Resolve Partial Assembly failed for An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC101003B Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:16:14 Event String: Generate Activation Context failed for An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC1010020 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:16:14 Event String: Dependent Assembly Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC could An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC101003B Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:16:14 Event String: Resolve Partial Assembly failed for An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC101003B Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:16:14 Event String: Generate Activation Context failed for An Error Event occured. EventID: 0x825A0011 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:22:57 (Event String could not be retrieved) An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC1010020 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:22:59 Event String: Dependent Assembly Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC could An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC101003B Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:22:59 Event String: Resolve Partial Assembly failed for An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC101003B Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:22:59 Event String: Generate Activation Context failed for An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC1010020 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:22:59 Event String: Dependent Assembly Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC could An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC101003B Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:22:59 Event String: Resolve Partial Assembly failed for An Error Event occured. EventID: 0xC101003B Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:22:59 Event String: Generate Activation Context failed for ......................... SERVER failed test systemlog Starting test: VerifyReferences ......................... SERVER passed test VerifyReferences Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom Running partition tests on : Schema Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom Running partition tests on : Configuration Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom Running partition tests on : icmcpk Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... icmcpk passed test CrossRefValidation Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... icmcpk passed test CheckSDRefDom Running enterprise tests on : icmcpk.local Starting test: Intersite ......................... icmcpk.local passed test Intersite Starting test: FsmoCheck ......................... icmcpk.local passed test FsmoCheck ---------------------- File-Server ---------------------- C:\Users\Administrator.ICMCPK>dcdiag Directory Server Diagnosis Performing initial setup: Trying to find home server... Home Server = FILE-SERVER * Identified AD Forest. Done gathering initial info. Doing initial required tests Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\FILE-SERVER Starting test: Connectivity ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test Connectivity Doing primary tests Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\FILE-SERVER Starting test: Advertising Warning: DsGetDcName returned information for \\Server.icmcpk.local, when we were trying to reach FILE-SERVER. SERVER IS NOT RESPONDING or IS NOT CONSIDERED SUITABLE. ......................... FILE-SERVER failed test Advertising Starting test: FrsEvent ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test FrsEvent Starting test: DFSREvent ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test DFSREvent Starting test: SysVolCheck ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test SysVolCheck Starting test: KccEvent ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test KccEvent Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders Starting test: MachineAccount ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test MachineAccount Starting test: NCSecDesc Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set access rights for the naming context: DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=icmcpk,DC=local Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set access rights for the naming context: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=icmcpk,DC=local ......................... FILE-SERVER failed test NCSecDesc Starting test: NetLogons Unable to connect to the NETLOGON share! (\\FILE-SERVER\netlogon) [FILE-SERVER] An net use or LsaPolicy operation failed with error 67, The network name cannot be found.. ......................... FILE-SERVER failed test NetLogons Starting test: ObjectsReplicated ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test ObjectsReplicated Starting test: Replications ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test Replications Starting test: RidManager ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test RidManager Starting test: Services ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test Services Starting test: SystemLog An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000469 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:01:10 Event String: The processing of Group Policy failed because of lack of network con nectivity to a domain controller. This may be a transient condition. A success m essage would be generated once the machine gets connected to the domain controll er and Group Policy has succesfully processed. If you do not see a success messa ge for several hours, then contact your administrator. An Warning Event occurred. EventID: 0x8000A001 Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:07:11 Event String: The Security System could not establish a secured connection with th e server ldap/icmcpk.local/[email protected]. No authentication protocol was available. An Warning Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000BBC Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:30:34 Event String: Windows Defender Real-Time Protection agent has detected changes. Mi crosoft recommends you analyze the software that made these changes for potentia l risks. You can use information about how these programs operate to choose whet her to allow them to run or remove them from your computer. Allow changes only if you trust the program or the software publisher. Windows Defender can't undo changes that you allow. An Warning Event occurred. EventID: 0x00000BBC Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:30:36 Event String: Windows Defender Real-Time Protection agent has detected changes. Mi crosoft recommends you analyze the software that made these changes for potentia l risks. You can use information about how these programs operate to choose whet her to allow them to run or remove them from your computer. Allow changes only if you trust the program or the software publisher. Windows Defender can't undo changes that you allow. ......................... FILE-SERVER failed test SystemLog Starting test: VerifyReferences ......................... FILE-SERVER passed test VerifyReferences Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation Running partition tests on : Schema Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation Running partition tests on : Configuration Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation Running partition tests on : icmcpk Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... icmcpk passed test CheckSDRefDom Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... icmcpk passed test CrossRefValidation Running enterprise tests on : icmcpk.local Starting test: LocatorCheck ......................... icmcpk.local passed test LocatorCheck Starting test: Intersite ......................... icmcpk.local passed test Intersite --------------------- WDS-Server --------------------- C:\Users\Administrator.ICMCPK>dcdiag Directory Server Diagnosis Performing initial setup: Trying to find home server... Home Server = WDS-SERVER * Identified AD Forest. Done gathering initial info. Doing initial required tests Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\WDS-SERVER Starting test: Connectivity ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test Connectivity Doing primary tests Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\WDS-SERVER Starting test: Advertising Warning: DsGetDcName returned information for \\Server.icmcpk.local, when we were trying to reach WDS-SERVER. SERVER IS NOT RESPONDING or IS NOT CONSIDERED SUITABLE. ......................... WDS-SERVER failed test Advertising Starting test: FrsEvent There are warning or error events within the last 24 hours after the SYSVOL has been shared. Failing SYSVOL replication problems may cause Group Policy problems. ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test FrsEvent Starting test: DFSREvent ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test DFSREvent Starting test: SysVolCheck ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test SysVolCheck Starting test: KccEvent ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test KccEvent Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders Starting test: MachineAccount ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test MachineAccount Starting test: NCSecDesc Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set access rights for the naming context: DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=icmcpk,DC=local Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set access rights for the naming context: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=icmcpk,DC=local ......................... WDS-SERVER failed test NCSecDesc Starting test: NetLogons Unable to connect to the NETLOGON share! (\\WDS-SERVER\netlogon) [WDS-SERVER] An net use or LsaPolicy operation failed with error 67, The network name cannot be found.. ......................... WDS-SERVER failed test NetLogons Starting test: ObjectsReplicated ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test ObjectsReplicated Starting test: Replications ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test Replications Starting test: RidManager ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test RidManager Starting test: Services ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test Services Starting test: SystemLog An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x0000041E Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:02:55 Event String: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not obtain the name of a domain controller. This could be caused by a name resolution failure. Verify your Domain Name Sysytem (DNS) is configured and working correctly. An Error Event occurred. EventID: 0x0000041E Time Generated: 05/04/2012 14:08:33 Event String: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not obtain the name of a domain controller. This could be caused by a name resolution failure. Verify your Domain Name Sysytem (DNS) is configured and working correctly. ......................... WDS-SERVER failed test SystemLog Starting test: VerifyReferences ......................... WDS-SERVER passed test VerifyReferences Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation Running partition tests on : Schema Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation Running partition tests on : Configuration Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation Running partition tests on : icmcpk Starting test: CheckSDRefDom ......................... icmcpk passed test CheckSDRefDom Starting test: CrossRefValidation ......................... icmcpk passed test CrossRefValidation Running enterprise tests on : icmcpk.local Starting test: LocatorCheck ......................... icmcpk.local passed test LocatorCheck Starting test: Intersite ......................... icmcpk.local passed test Intersite

Read the article

help with fixing fwts errors log

- by jasmines

Here is an extract of results.log: MTRR validation. Test 1 of 3: Validate the kernel MTRR IOMEM setup. FAILED [MEDIUM] MTRRIncorrectAttr: Test 1, Memory range 0xc0000000 to 0xdfffffff (PCI Bus 0000:00) has incorrect attribute Write-Combining. FAILED [MEDIUM] MTRRIncorrectAttr: Test 1, Memory range 0xfee01000 to 0xffffffff (PCI Bus 0000:00) has incorrect attribute Write-Protect. ==================================================================================================== Test 1 of 1: Kernel log error check. Kernel message: [ 0.208079] [Firmware Bug]: ACPI: BIOS _OSI(Linux) query ignored ADVICE: This is not exactly a failure mode but a warning from the kernel. The _OSI() method has implemented a match to the 'Linux' query in the DSDT and this is redundant because the ACPI driver matches onto the Windows _OSI strings by default. FAILED [HIGH] KlogACPIErrorMethodExecutionParse: Test 1, HIGH Kernel message: [ 3.512783] ACPI Error : Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DOD] (Node f7425858), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT (20110623/psparse-536) ADVICE: This is a bug picked up by the kernel, but as yet, the firmware test suite has no diagnostic advice for this particular problem. Found 1 unique errors in kernel log. ==================================================================================================== Check if system is using latest microcode. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cannot read microcode file /usr/share/misc/intel-microcode.dat. Aborted test, initialisation failed. ==================================================================================================== MSR register tests. FAILED [MEDIUM] MSRCPUsInconsistent: Test 1, MSR SYSENTER_ESP (0x175) has 1 inconsistent values across 2 CPUs for (shift: 0 mask: 0xffffffffffffffff). MSR CPU 0 -> 0xf7bb9c40 vs CPU 1 -> 0xf7bc7c40 FAILED [MEDIUM] MSRCPUsInconsistent: Test 1, MSR MISC_ENABLE (0x1a0) has 1 inconsistent values across 2 CPUs for (shift: 0 mask: 0x400c51889). MSR CPU 0 -> 0x850088 vs CPU 1 -> 0x850089 ==================================================================================================== Checks firmware has set PCI Express MaxReadReq to a higher value on non-motherboard devices. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test 1 of 1: Check firmware settings MaxReadReq for PCI Express devices. MaxReadReq for pci://00:00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) is low (128) [Audio device]. MaxReadReq for pci://00:02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 5100 AGN [Shiloh] Network Connection is low (128) [Network controller]. FAILED [LOW] LowMaxReadReq: Test 1, 2 devices have low MaxReadReq settings. Firmware may have configured these too low. ADVICE: The MaxReadRequest size is set too low and will affect performance. It will provide excellent bus sharing at the cost of bus data transfer rates. Although not a critical issue, it may be worth considering setting the MaxReadRequest size to 256 or 512 to increase throughput on the PCI Express bus. Some drivers (for example the Brocade Fibre Channel driver) allow one to override the firmware settings. Where possible, this BIOS configuration setting is worth increasing it a little more for better performance at a small reduction of bus sharing. ==================================================================================================== PCIe ASPM check. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test 1 of 2: PCIe ASPM ACPI test. PCIE ASPM is not controlled by Linux kernel. ADVICE: BIOS reports that Linux kernel should not modify ASPM settings that BIOS configured. It can be intentional because hardware vendors identified some capability bugs between the motherboard and the add-on cards. Test 2 of 2: PCIe ASPM registers test. WARNING: Test 2, RP 00h:1Ch.01h L0s not enabled. WARNING: Test 2, RP 00h:1Ch.01h L1 not enabled. WARNING: Test 2, Device 02h:00h.00h L0s not enabled. WARNING: Test 2, Device 02h:00h.00h L1 not enabled. PASSED: Test 2, PCIE aspm setting matched was matched. WARNING: Test 2, RP 00h:1Ch.05h L0s not enabled. WARNING: Test 2, RP 00h:1Ch.05h L1 not enabled. WARNING: Test 2, Device 85h:00h.00h L0s not enabled. WARNING: Test 2, Device 85h:00h.00h L1 not enabled. PASSED: Test 2, PCIE aspm setting matched was matched. ==================================================================================================== Extract and analyse Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI). Test 1 of 2: Check Windows Management Instrumentation in DSDT Found WMI Method WMAA with GUID: 5FB7F034-2C63-45E9-BE91-3D44E2C707E4, Instance 0x01 Found WMI Event, Notifier ID: 0x80, GUID: 95F24279-4D7B-4334-9387-ACCDC67EF61C, Instance 0x01 PASSED: Test 1, GUID 95F24279-4D7B-4334-9387-ACCDC67EF61C is handled by driver hp-wmi (Vendor: HP). Found WMI Event, Notifier ID: 0xa0, GUID: 2B814318-4BE8-4707-9D84-A190A859B5D0, Instance 0x01 FAILED [MEDIUM] WMIUnknownGUID: Test 1, GUID 2B814318-4BE8-4707-9D84-A190A859B5D0 is unknown to the kernel, a driver may need to be implemented for this GUID. ADVICE: A WMI driver probably needs to be written for this event. It can checked for using: wmi_has_guid("2B814318-4BE8-4707-9D84-A190A859B5D0"). One can install a notify handler using wmi_install_notify_handler("2B814318-4BE8-4707-9D84-A190A859B5D0", handler, NULL). http://lwn.net/Articles/391230 describes how to write an appropriate driver. Found WMI Object, Object ID AB, GUID: 05901221-D566-11D1-B2F0-00A0C9062910, Instance 0x01, Flags: 00 Found WMI Method WMBA with GUID: 1F4C91EB-DC5C-460B-951D-C7CB9B4B8D5E, Instance 0x01 Found WMI Object, Object ID BC, GUID: 2D114B49-2DFB-4130-B8FE-4A3C09E75133, Instance 0x7f, Flags: 00 Found WMI Object, Object ID BD, GUID: 988D08E3-68F4-4C35-AF3E-6A1B8106F83C, Instance 0x19, Flags: 00 Found WMI Object, Object ID BE, GUID: 14EA9746-CE1F-4098-A0E0-7045CB4DA745, Instance 0x01, Flags: 00 Found WMI Object, Object ID BF, GUID: 322F2028-0F84-4901-988E-015176049E2D, Instance 0x01, Flags: 00 Found WMI Object, Object ID BG, GUID: 8232DE3D-663D-4327-A8F4-E293ADB9BF05, Instance 0x01, Flags: 00 Found WMI Object, Object ID BH, GUID: 8F1F6436-9F42-42C8-BADC-0E9424F20C9A, Instance 0x00, Flags: 00 Found WMI Object, Object ID BI, GUID: 8F1F6435-9F42-42C8-BADC-0E9424F20C9A, Instance 0x00, Flags: 00 Found WMI Method WMAC with GUID: 7391A661-223A-47DB-A77A-7BE84C60822D, Instance 0x01 Found WMI Object, Object ID BJ, GUID: DF4E63B6-3BBC-4858-9737-C74F82F821F3, Instance 0x05, Flags: 00 ==================================================================================================== Disassemble DSDT to check for _OSI("Linux"). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test 1 of 1: Disassemble DSDT to check for _OSI("Linux"). This is not strictly a failure mode, it just alerts one that this has been defined in the DSDT and probably should be avoided since the Linux ACPI driver matches onto the Windows _OSI strings { If (_OSI ("Linux")) { Store (0x03E8, OSYS) } If (_OSI ("Windows 2001")) { Store (0x07D1, OSYS) } If (_OSI ("Windows 2001 SP1")) { Store (0x07D1, OSYS) } If (_OSI ("Windows 2001 SP2")) { Store (0x07D2, OSYS) } If (_OSI ("Windows 2006")) { Store (0x07D6, OSYS) } If (LAnd (MPEN, LEqual (OSYS, 0x07D1))) { TRAP (0x01, 0x48) } TRAP (0x03, 0x35) } WARNING: Test 1, DSDT implements a deprecated _OSI("Linux") test. ==================================================================================================== 0 passed, 0 failed, 1 warnings, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0 info only. ==================================================================================================== ACPI DSDT Method Semantic Tests. ACPICA Exception AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP during execution of method COMP Failed to install global event handler. Test 22 of 93: Check _PSR (Power Source). ACPICA Exception AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP during execution of method COMP WARNING: Test 22, Detected an infinite loop when evaluating method '\_SB_.AC__._PSR'. ADVICE: This may occur because we are emulating the execution in this test environment and cannot handshake with the embedded controller or jump to the BIOS via SMIs. However, the fact that AML code spins forever means that lockup conditions are not being checked for in the AML bytecode. PASSED: Test 22, \_SB_.AC__._PSR correctly acquired and released locks 16 times. Test 35 of 93: Check _TMP (Thermal Zone Current Temp). ACPICA Exception AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP during execution of method COMP WARNING: Test 35, Detected an infinite loop when evaluating method '\_TZ_.DTSZ._TMP'. ADVICE: This may occur because we are emulating the execution in this test environment and cannot handshake with the embedded controller or jump to the BIOS via SMIs. However, the fact that AML code spins forever means that lockup conditions are not being checked for in the AML bytecode. PASSED: Test 35, \_TZ_.DTSZ._TMP correctly acquired and released locks 14 times. ACPICA Exception AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP during execution of method COMP WARNING: Test 35, Detected an infinite loop when evaluating method '\_TZ_.CPUZ._TMP'. ADVICE: This may occur because we are emulating the execution in this test environment and cannot handshake with the embedded controller or jump to the BIOS via SMIs. However, the fact that AML code spins forever means that lockup conditions are not being checked for in the AML bytecode. PASSED: Test 35, \_TZ_.CPUZ._TMP correctly acquired and released locks 10 times. ACPICA Exception AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP during execution of method COMP WARNING: Test 35, Detected an infinite loop when evaluating method '\_TZ_.SKNZ._TMP'. ADVICE: This may occur because we are emulating the execution in this test environment and cannot handshake with the embedded controller or jump to the BIOS via SMIs. However, the fact that AML code spins forever means that lockup conditions are not being checked for in the AML bytecode. PASSED: Test 35, \_TZ_.SKNZ._TMP correctly acquired and released locks 10 times. PASSED: Test 35, _TMP correctly returned sane looking value 0x00000b4c (289.2 degrees K) PASSED: Test 35, \_TZ_.BATZ._TMP correctly acquired and released locks 9 times. PASSED: Test 35, _TMP correctly returned sane looking value 0x00000aac (273.2 degrees K) PASSED: Test 35, \_TZ_.FDTZ._TMP correctly acquired and released locks 7 times. Test 46 of 93: Check _DIS (Disable). FAILED [MEDIUM] MethodShouldReturnNothing: Test 46, \_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.SIO_.COM1._DIS returned values, but was expected to return nothing. Object returned: INTEGER: 0x00000000 ADVICE: This probably won't cause any errors, but it should be fixed as the AML code is not conforming to the expected behaviour as described in the ACPI specification. FAILED [MEDIUM] MethodShouldReturnNothing: Test 46, \_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.SIO_.LPT0._DIS returned values, but was expected to return nothing. Object returned: INTEGER: 0x00000000 ADVICE: This probably won't cause any errors, but it should be fixed as the AML code is not conforming to the expected behaviour as described in the ACPI specification. Test 61 of 93: Check _WAK (System Wake). Test _WAK(1) System Wake, State S1. ACPICA Exception AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP during execution of method COMP WARNING: Test 61, Detected an infinite loop when evaluating method '\_WAK'. ADVICE: This may occur because we are emulating the execution in this test environment and cannot handshake with the embedded controller or jump to the BIOS via SMIs. However, the fact that AML code spins forever means that lockup conditions are not being checked for in the AML bytecode. Test _WAK(2) System Wake, State S2. ACPICA Exception AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP during execution of method COMP WARNING: Test 61, Detected an infinite loop when evaluating method '\_WAK'. ADVICE: This may occur because we are emulating the execution in this test environment and cannot handshake with the embedded controller or jump to the BIOS via SMIs. However, the fact that AML code spins forever means that lockup conditions are not being checked for in the AML bytecode. Test _WAK(3) System Wake, State S3. ACPICA Exception AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP during execution of method COMP WARNING: Test 61, Detected an infinite loop when evaluating method '\_WAK'. ADVICE: This may occur because we are emulating the execution in this test environment and cannot handshake with the embedded controller or jump to the BIOS via SMIs. However, the fact that AML code spins forever means that lockup conditions are not being checked for in the AML bytecode. Test _WAK(4) System Wake, State S4. ACPICA Exception AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP during execution of method COMP WARNING: Test 61, Detected an infinite loop when evaluating method '\_WAK'. ADVICE: This may occur because we are emulating the execution in this test environment and cannot handshake with the embedded controller or jump to the BIOS via SMIs. However, the fact that AML code spins forever means that lockup conditions are not being checked for in the AML bytecode. Test _WAK(5) System Wake, State S5. ACPICA Exception AE_AML_INFINITE_LOOP during execution of method COMP WARNING: Test 61, Detected an infinite loop when evaluating method '\_WAK'. ADVICE: This may occur because we are emulating the execution in this test environment and cannot handshake with the embedded controller or jump to the BIOS via SMIs. However, the fact that AML code spins forever means that lockup conditions are not being checked for in the AML bytecode. Test 87 of 93: Check _BCL (Query List of Brightness Control Levels Supported). Package has 2 elements: 00: INTEGER: 0x00000000 01: INTEGER: 0x00000000 FAILED [MEDIUM] Method_BCLElementCount: Test 87, Method _BCL should return a package of more than 2 integers, got just 2. Test 88 of 93: Check _BCM (Set Brightness Level). ACPICA Exception AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT during execution of method _BCM FAILED [CRITICAL] AEAMLPackgeLimit: Test 88, Detected error 'Package limit' when evaluating '\_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DD02._BCM'. ==================================================================================================== ACPI table settings sanity checks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test 1 of 1: Check ACPI tables. PASSED: Test 1, Table APIC passed. Table ECDT not present to check. FAILED [MEDIUM] FADT32And64BothDefined: Test 1, FADT 32 bit FIRMWARE_CONTROL is non-zero, and X_FIRMWARE_CONTROL is also non-zero. Section 5.2.9 of the ACPI specification states that if the FIRMWARE_CONTROL is non-zero then X_FIRMWARE_CONTROL must be set to zero. ADVICE: The FADT FIRMWARE_CTRL is a 32 bit pointer that points to the physical memory address of the Firmware ACPI Control Structure (FACS). There is also an extended 64 bit version of this, the X_FIRMWARE_CTRL pointer that also can point to the FACS. Section 5.2.9 of the ACPI specification states that if the X_FIRMWARE_CTRL field contains a non zero value then the FIRMWARE_CTRL field *must* be zero. This error is also detected by the Linux kernel. If FIRMWARE_CTRL and X_FIRMWARE_CTRL are defined, then the kernel just uses the 64 bit version of the pointer. PASSED: Test 1, Table HPET passed. PASSED: Test 1, Table MCFG passed. PASSED: Test 1, Table RSDT passed. PASSED: Test 1, Table RSDP passed. Table SBST not present to check. PASSED: Test 1, Table XSDT passed. ==================================================================================================== Re-assemble DSDT and find syntax errors and warnings. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Test 1 of 2: Disassemble and reassemble DSDT FAILED [HIGH] AMLAssemblerError4043: Test 1, Assembler error in line 2261 Line | AML source ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 02258| 0x00000000, // Range Minimum 02259| 0xFEDFFFFF, // Range Maximum 02260| 0x00000000, // Translation Offset 02261| 0x00000000, // Length | ^ | error 4043: Invalid combination of Length and Min/Max fixed flags 02262| ,, _Y0E, AddressRangeMemory, TypeStatic) 02263| DWordMemory (ResourceProducer, PosDecode, MinFixed, MaxFixed, Cacheable, ReadWrite, 02264| 0x00000000, // Granularity ==================================================================================================== ADVICE: (for error #4043): This occurs if the length is zero and just one of the resource MIF/MAF flags are set, or the length is non-zero and resource MIF/MAF flags are both set. These are illegal combinations and need to be fixed. See section 6.4.3.5 Address Space Resource Descriptors of version 4.0a of the ACPI specification for more details. FAILED [HIGH] AMLAssemblerError4050: Test 1, Assembler error in line 2268 Line | AML source ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 02265| 0xFEE01000, // Range Minimum 02266| 0xFFFFFFFF, // Range Maximum 02267| 0x00000000, // Translation Offset 02268| 0x011FEFFF, // Length | ^ | error 4050: Length is not equal to fixed Min/Max window 02269| ,, , AddressRangeMemory, TypeStatic) 02270| }) 02271| Method (_CRS, 0, Serialized) ==================================================================================================== ADVICE: (for error #4050): The minimum address is greater than the maximum address. This is illegal. FAILED [HIGH] AMLAssemblerError1104: Test 1, Assembler error in line 8885 Line | AML source ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 08882| Method (_DIS, 0, NotSerialized) 08883| { 08884| DSOD (0x02) 08885| Return (0x00) | ^ | warning level 0 1104: Reserved method should not return a value (_DIS) 08886| } 08887| 08888| Method (_SRS, 1, NotSerialized) ==================================================================================================== FAILED [HIGH] AMLAssemblerError1104: Test 1, Assembler error in line 9195 Line | AML source ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09192| Method (_DIS, 0, NotSerialized) 09193| { 09194| DSOD (0x01) 09195| Return (0x00) | ^ | warning level 0 1104: Reserved method should not return a value (_DIS) 09196| } 09197| 09198| Method (_SRS, 1, NotSerialized) ==================================================================================================== FAILED [HIGH] AMLAssemblerError1127: Test 1, Assembler error in line 9242 Line | AML source ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 09239| CreateWordField (CRES, \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.SIO.LPT0._CRS._Y21._MAX, MAX2) 09240| CreateByteField (CRES, \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.SIO.LPT0._CRS._Y21._LEN, LEN2) 09241| CreateWordField (CRES, \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.SIO.LPT0._CRS._Y22._INT, IRQ0) 09242| CreateWordField (CRES, \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.SIO.LPT0._CRS._Y23._DMA, DMA0) | ^ | warning level 0 1127: ResourceTag smaller than Field (Tag: 8 bits, Field: 16 bits) 09243| If (RLPD) 09244| { 09245| Store (0x00, Local0) ==================================================================================================== FAILED [HIGH] AMLAssemblerError1128: Test 1, Assembler error in line 18682 Line | AML source ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18679| Store (0x01, Index (DerefOf (Index (Local0, 0x02)), 0x01)) 18680| If (And (WDPE, 0x40)) 18681| { 18682| Wait (\_SB.BEVT, 0x10) | ^ | warning level 0 1128: Result is not used, possible operator timeout will be missed 18683| } 18684| 18685| Store (BRID, Index (DerefOf (Index (Local0, 0x02)), 0x02)) ==================================================================================================== ADVICE: (for warning level 0 #1128): The operation can possibly timeout, and hence the return value indicates an timeout error. However, because the return value is not checked this very probably indicates that the code is buggy. A possible scenario is that a mutex times out and the code attempts to access data in a critical region when it should not. This will lead to undefined behaviour. This should be fixed. Table DSDT (0) reassembly: Found 2 errors, 4 warnings. Test 2 of 2: Disassemble and reassemble SSDT PASSED: Test 2, SSDT (0) reassembly, Found 0 errors, 0 warnings. FAILED [HIGH] AMLAssemblerError1104: Test 2, Assembler error in line 60 Line | AML source ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00057| { 00058| Store (CPDC (Arg0), Local0) 00059| GCAP (Local0) 00060| Return (Local0) | ^ | warning level 0 1104: Reserved method should not return a value (_PDC) 00061| } 00062| 00063| Method (_OSC, 4, NotSerialized) ==================================================================================================== FAILED [HIGH] AMLAssemblerError1104: Test 2, Assembler error in line 174 Line | AML source ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00171| { 00172| Store (\_PR.CPU0.CPDC (Arg0), Local0) 00173| GCAP (Local0) 00174| Return (Local0) | ^ | warning level 0 1104: Reserved method should not return a value (_PDC) 00175| } 00176| 00177| Method (_OSC, 4, NotSerialized) ==================================================================================================== FAILED [HIGH] AMLAssemblerError1104: Test 2, Assembler error in line 244 Line | AML source ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00241| { 00242| Store (\_PR.CPU0.CPDC (Arg0), Local0) 00243| GCAP (Local0) 00244| Return (Local0) | ^ | warning level 0 1104: Reserved method should not return a value (_PDC) 00245| } 00246| 00247| Method (_OSC, 4, NotSerialized) ==================================================================================================== FAILED [HIGH] AMLAssemblerError1104: Test 2, Assembler error in line 290 Line | AML source ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 00287| { 00288| Store (\_PR.CPU0.CPDC (Arg0), Local0) 00289| GCAP (Local0) 00290| Return (Local0) | ^ | warning level 0 1104: Reserved method should not return a value (_PDC) 00291| } 00292| 00293| Method (_OSC, 4, NotSerialized) ==================================================================================================== Table SSDT (1) reassembly: Found 0 errors, 4 warnings. PASSED: Test 2, SSDT (2) reassembly, Found 0 errors, 0 warnings. PASSED: Test 2, SSDT (3) reassembly, Found 0 errors, 0 warnings. ==================================================================================================== 3 passed, 10 failed, 0 warnings, 0 aborted, 0 skipped, 0 info only. ==================================================================================================== Critical failures: 1 method test, at 1 log line: 1449: Detected error 'Package limit' when evaluating '\_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DD02._BCM'. High failures: 11 klog test, at 1 log line: 121: HIGH Kernel message: [ 3.512783] ACPI Error: Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.GFX0._DOD] (Node f7425858), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT (20110623/psparse-536) syntaxcheck test, at 1 log line: 1668: Assembler error in line 2261 syntaxcheck test, at 1 log line: 1687: Assembler error in line 2268 syntaxcheck test, at 1 log line: 1703: Assembler error in line 8885 syntaxcheck test, at 1 log line: 1716: Assembler error in line 9195 syntaxcheck test, at 1 log line: 1729: Assembler error in line 9242 syntaxcheck test, at 1 log line: 1742: Assembler error in line 18682 syntaxcheck test, at 1 log line: 1766: Assembler error in line 60 syntaxcheck test, at 1 log line: 1779: Assembler error in line 174 syntaxcheck test, at 1 log line: 1792: Assembler error in line 244 syntaxcheck test, at 1 log line: 1805: Assembler error in line 290 Medium failures: 9 mtrr test, at 1 log line: 76: Memory range 0xc0000000 to 0xdfffffff (PCI Bus 0000:00) has incorrect attribute Write-Combining. mtrr test, at 1 log line: 78: Memory range 0xfee01000 to 0xffffffff (PCI Bus 0000:00) has incorrect attribute Write-Protect. msr test, at 1 log line: 165: MSR SYSENTER_ESP (0x175) has 1 inconsistent values across 2 CPUs for (shift: 0 mask: 0xffffffffffffffff). msr test, at 1 log line: 173: MSR MISC_ENABLE (0x1a0) has 1 inconsistent values across 2 CPUs for (shift: 0 mask: 0x400c51889). wmi test, at 1 log line: 528: GUID 2B814318-4BE8-4707-9D84-A190A859B5D0 is unknown to the kernel, a driver may need to be implemented for this GUID. method test, at 1 log line: 1002: \_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.SIO_.COM1._DIS returned values, but was expected to return nothing. method test, at 1 log line: 1011: \_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.SIO_.LPT0._DIS returned values, but was expected to return nothing. method test, at 1 log line: 1443: Method _BCL should return a package of more than 2 integers, got just 2. acpitables test, at 1 log line: 1643: FADT 32 bit FIRMWARE_CONTROL is non-zero, and X_FIRMWARE_CONTROL is also non-zero. Se

Read the article

Is String.toLowerCase() preserving original string length?

- by MicSim

Assume two Java String objects String str = "<my string>"; String strLower = str.toLowerCase(); Is it then true that for every value of <my string> (str.length() == strLower.length()) evaluates to true? So, does String.toLowerCase() preserve original string length for any value of String?

Read the article

What causes exception in string.concat

- by Budda

Here are few classes: public class MyItem : ParamOut { public string Code { get { return _quoteCode; } } public InnerItem[] Skus { get { return _skus; } } public PriceSummary Price { get { return _price; } } public override string ToString() { return string.Concat("Code=", Code, "; SKUs=[", Skus != null ? "{" + string.Join("},{", Array.ConvertAll(Skus, item => item.ToString())) + "}" : "", "]" , "; Price={", Price.ToString(), "}", base.ToString() ); } ... } public abstract class ParamOut { public override string ToString() { return null; } public string ErrorMessage { get; set; } } Here is calling functionality: { MyItem item = new MyItem{ ErrorMessage = "Bla-bla-bla" }; string text = item.ToString(); } I am getting NullReference exception inside of 'ToString()' method (each property of item variable is null). Question: Q1. what overload of string.Concat will be called in this case? I have 9 parameters, so I guess one of the following: public static string Concat(params Object[] args) or public static string Concat(params string[] values) But which of them? Q2. Why exception is generated? Shouldn't 'null' be converted into something like 'null' or "" (empty string)? Thanks a lot!

Read the article

Using String+string+string vs using string.replace

- by Madi D.

A colleague told me that using the following method: string url = "SomeURL"; string ext = "SomeExt"; string sub = "SomeSub"; string subSub = "moreSub"; string Url = @"http://www." + Url +@"/"+ ext +@"/"+ sub + subSub; is not efficenet (takes more resources) and it is preferred to use the following method: string Url = @"http://www.#URL.#EXT/#sub/#subSub"; string url = "SomeURL"; string ext = "SomeExt"; string sub = "SomeSub"; string subSub = "moreSub"; Url.Replace("#URL",url) Url.Replace("#EXT",ext); Url.Replace("#sub",sub); Url.Replace("#subSub",subSub); Is that true? and what is the explanation behind it?

Read the article

String concatenation: Final string value does not equal to the latest value

- by Pan Pizza

I have a simple question about string concatenation. Following is the code. I want to ask why s6 = "abcde" and not "akcde"? I have change the s2 value to "k". Public Class Form1 Public s1 As String = "a" Public s2 As String = "b" Public s3 As String = "c" Public s4 As String = "d" Public s5 As String = "e" Public s6 As String = "" Public s7 As String = "k" Private Sub Button2_Click(sender As System.Object, e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button2.Click s6 = s1 & s2 & s3 & s4 & s5 s2 = s7 MessageBox.Show(s6) 's6 = abcde End Sub End Class

Read the article

Read array dump output and generates the correspondent XML file

- by Christian

Hi, The text below is the dump of a multidimensional array, dumped by the var_dump() PHP function. I need a Java function that reads a file with a content like this (attached) and returns it in XML. For a reference, in site http://pear.php.net/package/Var_Dump/ you can find the code (in PHP) that generates dumps in XML, so all neeeded logic is there (I think). I will be waiting for your feedback. Regards, Christian array(1) { ["Processo"]= array(60) { ["Sistema"]= string(6) "E-PROC" ["UF"]= string(2) "RS" ["DataConsulta"]= string(19) "11/05/2010 17:59:17" ["Processo"]= string(20) "50000135320104047100" ["NumRegistJudici"]= string(20) "50000135320104047100" ["IdProcesso"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000001" ["SeqProcesso"]= string(1) "1" ["Autuado"]= string(19) "08/01/2010 12:04:47" ["StatusProcesso"]= string(1) "M" ["ComSituacaoProcesso"]= string(2) "00" ["Situacao"]= string(9) "MOVIMENTO" ["IdClasseJudicial"]= string(10) "0000000112" ["DesClasse"]= string(18) "INQUÉRITO POLICIAL" ["CodClasse"]= string(6) "000120" ["SigClasse"]= string(3) "INQ" ["DesTipoInquerito"]= string(0) "" ["CodCompetencia"]= string(2) "21" ["IdLocalidadeJudicial"]= string(4) "7150" ["ClasseSigAutor"]= string(5) "AUTOR" ["ClasseDesAutor"]= string(5) "AUTOR" ["ClasseSigReu"]= string(7) "INDICDO" ["ClasseDesReu"]= string(9) "INDICIADO" ["ClasseCodReu"]= string(2) "64" ["TipoAcao"]= string(8) "Criminal" ["TipoProcessoJudicial"]= string(1) "2" ["CodAssuntoPrincipal"]= string(6) "051801" ["CodLocalidadeJudicial"]= string(2) "00" ["IdAssuntoPrincipal"]= string(4) "1504" ["IdLocalizadorOrgaoPrincipal"]= string(30) "711264420823128430420000000001" ["ChaveConsulta"]= string(12) "513009403710" ["NumAdministrativo"]= NULL ["Magistrado"]= string(28) "RICARDO HUMBERTO SILVA BORNE" ["IdOrgaoJuizo"]= string(9) "710000085" ["IdOrgaoJuizoOriginario"]= string(9) "710000085" ["DesOrgaoJuizo"]= string(45) "JUÍZO FED. DA 02A VF CRIMINAL DE PORTO ALEGRE" ["SigOrgaoJuizo"]= string(10) "RSPOACR02F" ["CodOrgaoJuizo"]= string(9) "RS0000085" ["IdOrgaoSecretaria"]= string(9) "710000084" ["DesOrgaoSecretaria"]= string(31) "02a VF CRIMINAL DE PORTO ALEGRE" ["SigOrgaoSecretaria"]= string(9) "RSPOACR02" ["CodOrgaoSecretaria"]= string(9) "RS0000084" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" ["Localizador"]= string(25) "EM TRÂMITE ENTRE PF E MPF" ["TotalCda"]= int(0) ["DesIpl"]= string(8) "012/2010" ["Assunto"]= array(1) { [0]= array(4) { ["IdAssuntoJudicial"]= string(4) "1504" ["SeqAssunto"]= string(1) "1" ["CodAssunto"]= string(6) "051801" ["DesAssunto"]= string(84) "Moeda Falsa / Assimilados (arts. 289 e parágrafos e 290), Crimes contra a Fé Pública" } } ["ParteAutor"]= array(1) { [0]= array(12) { ["IdPessoa"]= string(30) "771230778800100040000000000508" ["TipoPessoa"]= string(3) "ENT" ["Nome"]= string(15) "POLÍCIA FEDERAL" ["Identificacao"]= string(14) "79621439000191" ["SinPartePrincipal"]= string(1) "S" ["IdProcessoParte"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000002" ["IdProcessoParteAtributo"]= NULL ["IdRepresentacao"]= NULL ["TipoRepresentacao"]= NULL ["AtributosProcessoParte"]= NULL ["Relacao"]= NULL ["Procurador"]= array(6) { [0]= array(4) { ["Nome"]= string(25) "SOLON RAMOS CARDOSO FILHO" ["Sigla"]= string(13) "cor-sr-dpf-rs" ["IdUsuarioProcurador"]= string(30) "711262893271855450420000000001" ["TipoUsuario"]= string(3) "CPF" } [1]= array(4) { ["Nome"]= string(18) "LUCIANA IOP CECHIN" ["Sigla"]= string(11) "luciana.lic" ["IdUsuarioProcurador"]= string(30) "711262946806708880420000000001" ["TipoUsuario"]= string(3) "CPF" } [2]= array(4) { ["Nome"]= string(31) "ALEXANDRE DA SILVEIRA ISBARROLA" ["Sigla"]= string(15) "drcor-sr-dpf-rs" ["IdUsuarioProcurador"]= string(30) "711262949451860560420000000001" ["TipoUsuario"]= string(3) "CPF" } [3]= array(4) { ["Nome"]= string(24) "JUCÉLIA TERESINHA PISONI" ["Sigla"]= string(11) "jucelia.jtp" ["IdUsuarioProcurador"]= string(30) "711262950492275450420000000001" ["TipoUsuario"]= string(3) "CPF" } [4]= array(4) { ["Nome"]= string(32) "MARCOS ANTONIO SIQUEIRA PICININI" ["Sigla"]= string(13) "picinini.masp" ["IdUsuarioProcurador"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["TipoUsuario"]= string(3) "APF" } [5]= array(4) { ["Nome"]= string(20) "PRISCILLA BURLACENKO" ["Sigla"]= string(12) "priscilla.pb" ["IdUsuarioProcurador"]= string(30) "711262955631630740420000000001" ["TipoUsuario"]= string(3) "DPF" } } } } ["ParteReu"]= array(1) { [0]= array(11) { ["IdPessoa"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000001" ["TipoPessoa"]= string(2) "PF" ["Nome"]= string(8) "A APURAR" ["Identificacao"]= NULL ["SinPartePrincipal"]= string(1) "S" ["IdProcessoParte"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000001" ["IdProcessoParteAtributo"]= NULL ["IdRepresentacao"]= NULL ["TipoRepresentacao"]= NULL ["AtributosProcessoParte"]= NULL ["Relacao"]= NULL } } ["OutraParte"]= array(1) { [0]= array(10) { ["Nome"]= string(26) "MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO FEDERAL" ["CodTipoParte"]= string(3) "114" ["DesTipoParte"]= string(3) "MPF" ["SinPolo"]= string(1) "N" ["Identificacao"]= string(13) "3636198000192" ["SinPartePrincipal"]= string(1) "N" ["IdProcessoParte"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000003" ["IdPessoa"]= string(30) "771230778800100040000000000217" ["TipoPessoa"]= string(3) "ENT" ["Procurador"]= array(1) { [0]= array(4) { ["Nome"]= string(25) "MARIA VALESCA DE MESQUITA" ["IdUsuarioProcurador"]= string(30) "711265220162198740420000000001" ["TipoUsuario"]= string(1) "P" ["Sigla"]= string(5) "pr528" } } } } ["DadoComplementar"]= array(6) { [0]= array(5) { ["DesDadoComplem"]= string(21) "Antecipação de Tutela" ["ValorDadoComplem"]= string(13) "Não Requerida" ["IdDadoComplementar"]= string(1) "1" ["NumIdProcessoDadoComplem"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000003" ["IdDadoComplementarValor"]= string(1) "4" } [1]= array(5) { ["DesDadoComplem"]= string(16) "Justiça Gratuita" ["ValorDadoComplem"]= string(13) "Não Requerida" ["IdDadoComplementar"]= string(1) "4" ["NumIdProcessoDadoComplem"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000001" ["IdDadoComplementarValor"]= string(1) "3" } [2]= array(5) { ["DesDadoComplem"]= string(15) "Petição Urgente" ["ValorDadoComplem"]= string(3) "Não" ["IdDadoComplementar"]= string(1) "5" ["NumIdProcessoDadoComplem"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000004" ["IdDadoComplementarValor"]= string(1) "2" } [3]= array(5) { ["DesDadoComplem"]= string(22) "Prioridade Atendimento" ["ValorDadoComplem"]= string(3) "Não" ["IdDadoComplementar"]= string(1) "2" ["NumIdProcessoDadoComplem"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000006" ["IdDadoComplementarValor"]= string(1) "2" } [4]= array(5) { ["DesDadoComplem"]= string(9) "Réu Preso" ["ValorDadoComplem"]= string(3) "Não" ["IdDadoComplementar"]= string(1) "6" ["NumIdProcessoDadoComplem"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000002" ["IdDadoComplementarValor"]= string(1) "2" } [5]= array(5) { ["DesDadoComplem"]= string(24) "Vista Ministério Público" ["ValorDadoComplem"]= string(3) "Sim" ["IdDadoComplementar"]= string(1) "3" ["NumIdProcessoDadoComplem"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000005" ["IdDadoComplementarValor"]= string(1) "1" } } ["SemPrazoAbrir"]= bool(true) ["Evento"]= array(8) { [0]= array(18) { ["IdProcessoEvento"]= string(30) "711269271039215440420000000001" ["IdEvento"]= string(3) "228" ["IdTipoPeticaoJudicial"]= string(3) "166" ["SeqEvento"]= string(1) "8" ["DataHora"]= string(19) "22/03/2010 12:19:16" ["SinExibeDesEvento"]= string(1) "S" ["SinUsuarioInterno"]= string(1) "N" ["IdGrupoEvento"]= string(1) "4" ["SinVisualizaDocumentoExterno"]= string(1) "N" ["Complemento"]= string(7) "90 DIAS" ["DesEventoSemComplemento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["CodEvento"]= string(10) "0000000852" ["DesEvento"]= string(37) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA - 90 DIAS" ["DesAlternativaEvento"]= NULL ["Usuario"]= string(7) "ap18785" ["idUsuario"]= string(30) "711263330517182580420000000001" ["DesPeticao"]= string(25) "DILAÇÃO DE PRAZO DEFERIDA" ["DescricaoCompleta"]= string(75) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA - 90 DIAS - DILAÇÃO DE PRAZO DEFERIDA - 90 DIAS" } [1]= array(18) { ["IdProcessoEvento"]= string(30) "711269032501923580420000000001" ["IdEvento"]= string(3) "228" ["IdTipoPeticaoJudicial"]= string(3) "166" ["SeqEvento"]= string(1) "7" ["DataHora"]= string(19) "19/03/2010 18:04:59" ["SinExibeDesEvento"]= string(1) "S" ["SinUsuarioInterno"]= string(1) "N" ["IdGrupoEvento"]= string(1) "4" ["SinVisualizaDocumentoExterno"]= string(1) "N" ["Complemento"]= string(7) "90 DIAS" ["DesEventoSemComplemento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["CodEvento"]= string(10) "0000000852" ["DesEvento"]= string(37) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA - 90 DIAS" ["DesAlternativaEvento"]= NULL ["Usuario"]= string(5) "pr700" ["idUsuario"]= string(30) "711262976146980920420000000002" ["DesPeticao"]= string(25) "DILAÇÃO DE PRAZO DEFERIDA" ["DescricaoCompleta"]= string(75) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA - 90 DIAS - DILAÇÃO DE PRAZO DEFERIDA - 90 DIAS" } [2]= array(19) { ["IdProcessoEvento"]= string(30) "711268077089625240420000000001" ["IdEvento"]= string(3) "228" ["IdTipoPeticaoJudicial"]= string(3) "165" ["SeqEvento"]= string(1) "6" ["DataHora"]= string(19) "08/03/2010 16:55:48" ["SinExibeDesEvento"]= string(1) "N" ["SinUsuarioInterno"]= string(1) "N" ["IdGrupoEvento"]= string(1) "4" ["SinVisualizaDocumentoExterno"]= string(1) "N" ["Complemento"]= NULL ["DesEventoSemComplemento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["CodEvento"]= string(10) "0000000852" ["DesEvento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["DesAlternativaEvento"]= NULL ["Usuario"]= string(13) "picinini.masp" ["idUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["Documento"]= array(2) { [0]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711268077089625240420000000001" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "1" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(4) "CERT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [1]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711268077089625240420000000002" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "2" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(4) "DESP" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } } ["DesPeticao"]= string(26) "PEDIDO DE DILAÇÃO DE PRAZO" ["DescricaoCompleta"]= string(26) "PEDIDO DE DILAÇÃO DE PRAZO" } [3]= array(19) { ["IdProcessoEvento"]= string(30) "711267732906972600420000000001" ["IdEvento"]= string(3) "228" ["IdTipoPeticaoJudicial"]= string(2) "52" ["SeqEvento"]= string(1) "5" ["DataHora"]= string(19) "04/03/2010 17:20:29" ["SinExibeDesEvento"]= string(1) "N" ["SinUsuarioInterno"]= string(1) "N" ["IdGrupoEvento"]= string(1) "4" ["SinVisualizaDocumentoExterno"]= string(1) "N" ["Complemento"]= NULL ["DesEventoSemComplemento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["CodEvento"]= string(10) "0000000852" ["DesEvento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["DesAlternativaEvento"]= NULL ["Usuario"]= string(5) "pr700" ["idUsuario"]= string(30) "711262976146980920420000000002" ["Documento"]= array(1) { [0]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262976146980920420000000002" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711267732906972600420000000001" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "1" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(3) "PET" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } } ["DesPeticao"]= string(7) "PETIÇÃO" ["DescricaoCompleta"]= string(7) "PETIÇÃO" } [4]= array(19) { ["IdProcessoEvento"]= string(30) "711265889365256290420000000001" ["IdEvento"]= string(3) "228" ["IdTipoPeticaoJudicial"]= string(3) "165" ["SeqEvento"]= string(1) "4" ["DataHora"]= string(19) "11/02/2010 09:59:04" ["SinExibeDesEvento"]= string(1) "N" ["SinUsuarioInterno"]= string(1) "N" ["IdGrupoEvento"]= string(1) "4" ["SinVisualizaDocumentoExterno"]= string(1) "N" ["Complemento"]= NULL ["DesEventoSemComplemento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["CodEvento"]= string(10) "0000000852" ["DesEvento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["DesAlternativaEvento"]= NULL ["Usuario"]= string(13) "picinini.masp" ["idUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["Documento"]= array(2) { [0]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711265222866995860420000000001" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "1" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(4) "PORT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [1]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711265222866995860420000000002" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "2" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(3) "OUT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } } ["DesPeticao"]= string(26) "PEDIDO DE DILAÇÃO DE PRAZO" ["DescricaoCompleta"]= string(26) "PEDIDO DE DILAÇÃO DE PRAZO" } [5]= array(19) { ["IdProcessoEvento"]= string(30) "711263991150788270420000000001" ["IdEvento"]= string(3) "228" ["IdTipoPeticaoJudicial"]= string(2) "52" ["SeqEvento"]= string(1) "3" ["DataHora"]= string(19) "20/01/2010 10:50:05" ["SinExibeDesEvento"]= string(1) "N" ["SinUsuarioInterno"]= string(1) "N" ["IdGrupoEvento"]= string(1) "4" ["SinVisualizaDocumentoExterno"]= string(1) "N" ["Complemento"]= NULL ["DesEventoSemComplemento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["CodEvento"]= string(10) "0000000852" ["DesEvento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["DesAlternativaEvento"]= NULL ["Usuario"]= string(13) "picinini.masp" ["idUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["Documento"]= array(4) { [0]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711263991150788270420000000001" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "1" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(4) "DECL" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [1]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711263991150788270420000000002" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "2" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(4) "DECL" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [2]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711263991150788270420000000003" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "3" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(4) "DECL" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [3]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711263991150788270420000000004" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "4" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(4) "DECL" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } } ["DesPeticao"]= string(7) "PETIÇÃO" ["DescricaoCompleta"]= string(7) "PETIÇÃO" } [6]= array(19) { ["IdProcessoEvento"]= string(30) "711263955058688620420000000001" ["IdEvento"]= string(3) "228" ["IdTipoPeticaoJudicial"]= string(2) "52" ["SeqEvento"]= string(1) "2" ["DataHora"]= string(19) "20/01/2010 00:40:39" ["SinExibeDesEvento"]= string(1) "N" ["SinUsuarioInterno"]= string(1) "N" ["IdGrupoEvento"]= string(1) "4" ["SinVisualizaDocumentoExterno"]= string(1) "N" ["Complemento"]= NULL ["DesEventoSemComplemento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["CodEvento"]= string(10) "0000000852" ["DesEvento"]= string(27) "PETIÇÃO PROTOCOLADA JUNTADA" ["DesAlternativaEvento"]= NULL ["Usuario"]= string(13) "picinini.masp" ["idUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["Documento"]= array(6) { [0]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711263229632249660420000000001" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "1" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(3) "OUT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [1]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711263229632249660420000000002" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "2" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(3) "OUT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [2]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711263229632249660420000000003" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "3" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(3) "OUT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [3]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711263229632249660420000000004" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "4" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(3) "OUT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [4]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711263229632249660420000000005" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "5" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(3) "OUT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [5]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711263229632249660420000000006" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "6" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(3) "OUT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } } ["DesPeticao"]= string(7) "PETIÇÃO" ["DescricaoCompleta"]= string(7) "PETIÇÃO" } [7]= array(19) { ["IdProcessoEvento"]= string(30) "711262958983115560390000000001" ["IdEvento"]= string(3) "430" ["IdTipoPeticaoJudicial"]= NULL ["SeqEvento"]= string(1) "1" ["DataHora"]= string(19) "08/01/2010 12:04:47" ["SinExibeDesEvento"]= NULL ["SinUsuarioInterno"]= string(1) "N" ["IdGrupoEvento"]= string(1) "0" ["SinVisualizaDocumentoExterno"]= string(1) "N" ["Complemento"]= NULL ["DesEventoSemComplemento"]= string(56) "Distribuição/Atribuição Ordinária por sorteio eletrônico" ["CodEvento"]= string(6) "030101" ["DesEvento"]= string(56) "Distribuição/Atribuição Ordinária por sorteio eletrônico" ["DesAlternativaEvento"]= NULL ["Usuario"]= string(13) "picinini.masp" ["idUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["Documento"]= array(4) { [0]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711262956008922510390000000001" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "1" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(4) "PORT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [1]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711262956008922510390000000002" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "2" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(4) "OFIC" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [2]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711262956008922510390000000003" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "3" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(3) "OUT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } [3]= array(6) { ["IdUsuario"]= string(30) "711262951173995330420000000001" ["IdDocumento"]= string(30) "711262956008922510390000000004" ["SeqDocumento"]= string(1) "4" ["SigTipoDocumento"]= string(3) "OUT" ["IdSigilo"]= string(1) "0" ["DesSigilo"]= string(10) "Sem Sigilo" } } ["DesPeticao"]= string(56) "Distribuição/Atribuição Ordinária por sorteio eletrônico" ["DescricaoCompleta"]= string(56) "Distribuição/Atribuição Ordinária por sorteio eletrônico" } } ["ValCausa"]= string(4) "0.00" ["OrgaoJul"]= string(45) "JUÍZO FED. DA 02A VF CRIMINAL DE PORTO ALEGRE" ["CodOrgaoJul"]= string(9) "RS0000085" ["OrgaoColegiado"]= NULL ["CodOrgaoColegiado"]= NULL ["CodOrgaoColegiadoSecretaria"]= NULL } }

Read the article

String Manipultation - Get String between two other Strings?

- by Ben

I have a large piece of text in which there is something simular to this: !#_KT_#!COMMANDHERE!#_KT_#! I want, in VB.Net, to get the 'COMMANDHERE' part of the string, how would I go about doing this? I have this so far: Dim temp As String = WebBrowser1.Document.Body.ToString Dim startIndex As Integer = temp.IndexOf("!#__KT__#!") + 1 Dim endIndex As Integer = temp.IndexOf("!#__KT__#!", startIndex) Dim extraction As String = temp.Substring(startIndex, endIndex - startIndex).Trim TextBox1.Text = extraction However this only removes the LAST string eg: #_KT_#! COMMAND. Any help is appreciated!

Read the article

Retrieve string from the middle of a string

- by ahsteele

I have a coded string that I'd like to retrieve a value from. I realize that I can do some string manipulation to pull out 12_35_55_219 from the below string but I was wondering if there was a clean way of doing so. "AddedProject[12_35_55_219]0"

Read the article

EICAR like antivirus test for Windows 64 bits

- by PabloG

I'm trying to check my antivirus protection downloading the EICAR test program as usual. The antivirus pops up an alert on the download (that's ok), but I cannot run the EICAR.COM program because it's an 16-bit program and I'm running Win7 64bit. I can run the program on DosBox but it's not the same thing as running it directly from the OS. Is there any antivirus test program like EICAR for 64 bit Windows? TIA, Pablo

Read the article

test cases test cases test cases

- by test user

this is test caes....

Read the article

C - check if string is a substring of another string

- by user69514

I need to write a program that takes two strings as arguments and check if the second one is a substring of the first one. I need to do it without using any special library functions. I created this implementation, but I think it's always returning true as long as there is one letter that's the same in both strings. Can you help me out here. I'm not sure what I am doing wrong: #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> int my_strstr( char const *s, char const *sub ) { char const *ret = sub; int r = 0; while ( ret = strchr( ret, *sub ) ) { if ( strcmp( ++ret, sub+1 ) == 0 ){ r = 1; } else{ r = 0; } } return r; } int main(int argc, char **argv){ if (argc != 3) { printf ("Usage: check <string one> <string two>\n"); } int result = my_strstr(argv[1], argv[2]); if(result == 1){ printf("%s is a substring of %s\n", argv[2], argv[1]); } else{ printf("%s is not a substring of %s\n", argv[2], argv[1]); } return 0; }

Search Results

Search found 55276 results on 2212 pages for 'eicar test string'.

Page 1/2212 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Next Page >

- by ybbest

- by SAMIR BHOGAYTA

- by David J.

- by makerofthings7

- by Test

- by Pabuc

- by GodMan

- by developerit

- by Hosam Kamel

- by sf

- by Jakob Ehn

- by Barfieldmv

- by developerit

- by Suleman

- by jasmines

- by MicSim

- by Budda

- by Madi D.

- by Pan Pizza

- by Christian

- by Ben

- by ahsteele

- by PabloG

- by test user

- by user69514

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Next Page >