Search Results

Search found 5 results on 1 pages for 'eix'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

• Make eix available version match emerge

  - by Ryaner

  We have out Gentoo hosts using a binhost with EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--getbinpkgonly --usepkgonly" in the make.conf file so that the host only pulled down the binary hosts. All works well from that side. I use eix to check on software versions for upgrades but have hit a problem where eix will see an available version ahead of what is available on the binserver. Using glibc as an example ietpl [VE] / # emerge -s glibc Searching... [ Results for search key : glibc ] [ Applications found : 1 ] * sys-libs/glibc Latest version available: 2.14.1-r3 Latest version installed: 2.14.1-r3 Homepage: Description: GNU libc6 (also called glibc2) C library License: LGPL-2 Then eix reports a higher version available ietpl [VE] / # export LASTVERSION='{last}<version>{}' ietpl [VE] / # /usr/bin/eix --nocolor --format '<category> <name> [<installedversions:LASTVERSION>] [<bestversion:LASTVERSION>] \n' --exact --category-name sys-libs/glibc sys-libs glibc [2.14.1-r3] [2.15-r2] What I'm after is for eix to report the latest version available as 2.14.1-r3 like emerge. I've a feeling this is possible since without any formatting, eix returns Available versions: (2.2) ~2.9_p20081201-r3!s 2.10.1-r1!s 2.11.3!s ~2.12.1-r3!s 2.12.2!s{tbz2} ~2.13-r2!s 2.13-r4!s ~2.14!s ~2.14.1-r2!s 2.14.1-r3!s{tbz2} ~2.15-r1!s 2.15-r2!s ~2.15-r3!s **2.16.0!s **9999!s correctly tagging the latest unmasked binary package with {tbz2} I would have thought that the binary flag would do it, but that returns no matches --binary Match packages with *.tbz2 files.

  Read the article

• Gentoo Linux useful utilities

  - by Alakdae

  I want to make a list of utilities that come in handy in Gentoo (general Linux tools available in all distributions also appreciated). What tools and commands do you use and consider helpful in administration of a Gentoo server? I will update the list with command from answers from time to time. eclean Utility for cleaning distfiles and binary packages. Usage example: eclean distfiles Usage example output: Cleans out the files in /usr/portage/distfiles. Pretty handy. Package: app-portage/gentoolkit eix Very useful tool for getting information about a package. Similar to "emerge -s" but much faster and more precise. Usage example: eix gentoolkit Usage example output: Show information about package such as: available versions, masked versions, installed versions and description. Package: app-portage/eix eix-test-obsolete Check system for obsolete, redundant, uninstalled entries in package.keywords, package.mask, package.unmask, package.use and package.cflags Usage example: eix-test-obsolete Usage example output: Shows non-matching entries, redundant entries, and uninstalled entries. Package: app-portage/eix equery Another very useful tool for getting information about packages (listing package files, checking which files belong to which package and much more) Usage example: equery b emerge Usage example output: Show which packages installed a file called emerge Package: app-portage/gentoolkit genlop Utility for extracting information about emerged ebuilds Usage example: genlop -l --date yesterday Usage example output: Show a list of packages that have been emerged yesterdayPackage: app-portage/genlop glsa-check Checks system if it's affected by GLSAs (security issues) Usage example: glsa-check -l affected Usage example output: List of GLSA that the system is affected by. Package: app-portage/gentoolkit rc-update Utility for managing (adding, deleting) runlevel scripts. Usage example: rc-update add syslog-ng default Usage example output: Adds syslog-ng to default runlevel. Package: sys-apps/baselayout revdep-rebuild Scans libraries and binaries for missing shared library dependencies Usage example: revdep-rebuild Usage example output: Gather binaries and libraries information, check for dependencies, rebuild packages with missing dependencies Package: app-portage/gentoolkit

  Read the article

• uname -a gives wrong version of kernel in gentoo?

  - by freedrull

  Hi I'm running gentoo and doing uname -a gives the wrong kernel version. tony@P_P-o ~ $ uname -a Linux P_P-o 2.6.27-gentoo-r8 #12 SMP PREEMPT Sun Nov 8 19:46:59 PST 2009 i686 Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2060 @ 1.60GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux Running eix gentoo-sources shows that I have a later version than that installed: tony@P_P-o ~ $ eix gentoo-sources [U] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources Available versions: (2.6.16-r13) 2.6.16-r13!b!s (2.6.25-r9) 2.6.25-r9!b!s (2.6.26-r4) 2.6.26-r4!b!s (2.6.27-r8) 2.6.27-r8!b!s (2.6.27-r10) 2.6.27-r10!b!s (2.6.28-r5) 2.6.28-r5!b!s (2.6.28-r6) 2.6.28-r6!b!s (2.6.29-r5) 2.6.29-r5!b!s (2.6.29-r6) 2.6.29-r6!b!s (2.6.30) ~2.6.30!b!s (2.6.30-r3) ~2.6.30-r3!b!s (2.6.30-r4) 2.6.30-r4!b!s (2.6.30-r5) 2.6.30-r5!b!s (2.6.30-r6) 2.6.30-r6!b!s (2.6.30-r7) 2.6.30-r7!b!s (2.6.30-r8) 2.6.30-r8!b!s (2.6.31) ~2.6.31!b!s (2.6.31-r1) ~2.6.31-r1!b!s (2.6.31-r2) ~2.6.31-r2!b!s (2.6.31-r3) ~2.6.31-r3!b!s (2.6.31-r4) ~2.6.31-r4!b!s {build symlink ultra1} Installed versions: 2.6.27-r8(2.6.27-r8)!b!s(07:48:25 PM 06/19/2009)(-build -symlink) 2.6.28-r5(2.6.28-r5)!b!s(12:35:17 PM 06/08/2009)(-build -symlink) 2.6.29-r5(2.6.29-r5)!b!s(07:44:33 PM 06/19/2009)(-build -symlink) 2.6.30-r6(2.6.30-r6)!b!s(11:14:45 PM 10/02/2009)(-build -symlink) Homepage: http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches Description: Full sources including the Gentoo patchset for the 2.6 kernel tree What gives?

  Read the article

• Can't update scala on Gentoo

  - by xhochy

  As I wanted to test Scala 2.9.2 on my gentoo system I tried updated the package but ended up with this error. I can't figure out where the problem may be: Calculating dependencies ...... done! >>> Verifying ebuild manifests >>> Jobs: 0 of 1 complete, 1 running Load avg: 0.23, 0.16, 0.20 >>> Emerging (1 of 1) dev-lang/scala-2.9.2 >>> Jobs: 0 of 1 complete, 1 running Load avg: 0.23, 0.16, 0.20 >>> Failed to emerge dev-lang/scala-2.9.2, Log file: >>> Jobs: 0 of 1 complete, 1 running Load avg: 0.23, 0.16, 0.20 >>> '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/scala-2.9.2/temp/build.log' >>> Jobs: 0 of 1 complete, 1 running Load avg: 0.23, 0.16, 0.20 >>> Jobs: 0 of 1 complete, 1 running, 1 failed Load avg: 0.23, 0.16, 0.20 >>> Jobs: 0 of 1 complete, 1 failed Load avg: 0.23, 0.16, 0.20 * Package: dev-lang/scala-2.9.2 * Repository: gentoo * Maintainer: [email protected] * USE: amd64 elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib userland_GNU * FEATURES: sandbox [01m[31;06m!!! ERROR: Couldn't find suitable VM. Possible invalid dependency string. Due to jdk-with-com-sun requiring a target of 1.7 but the virtual machines constrained by virtual/jdk-1.6 and/or this package requiring virtual(s) jdk-with-com-sun[0m * Unable to determine VM for building from dependencies: NV_DEPEND: virtual/jdk:1.6 java-virtuals/jdk-with-com-sun !binary? ( dev-java/ant-contrib:0 ) app-arch/xz-utils >=dev-java/java-config-2.1.9-r1 source? ( app-arch/zip ) >=dev-java/ant-core-1.7.0 dev-java/ant-nodeps >=dev-java/javatoolkit-0.3.0-r2 >=dev-lang/python-2.4 * ERROR: dev-lang/scala-2.9.2 failed (setup phase): * Failed to determine VM for building. * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called pkg_setup * scala-2.9.2.ebuild, line 43: Called java-pkg-2_pkg_setup * java-pkg-2.eclass, line 53: Called java-pkg_init * java-utils-2.eclass, line 2187: Called java-pkg_switch-vm * java-utils-2.eclass, line 2674: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * die "Failed to determine VM for building." * * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=dev-lang/scala-2.9.2'`, * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv '=dev-lang/scala-2.9.2'`. !!! When you file a bug report, please include the following information: GENTOO_VM= CLASSPATH="" JAVA_HOME="" JAVACFLAGS="" COMPILER="" and of course, the output of emerge --info * The complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/scala-2.9.2/temp/build.log'. * The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/scala-2.9.2/temp/die.env'. * Working directory: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/scala-2.9.2' * S: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/scala-2.9.2/work/scala-2.9.2-sources' * Messages for package dev-lang/scala-2.9.2: * Unable to determine VM for building from dependencies: * ERROR: dev-lang/scala-2.9.2 failed (setup phase): * Failed to determine VM for building. * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called pkg_setup * scala-2.9.2.ebuild, line 43: Called java-pkg-2_pkg_setup * java-pkg-2.eclass, line 53: Called java-pkg_init * java-utils-2.eclass, line 2187: Called java-pkg_switch-vm * java-utils-2.eclass, line 2674: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * die "Failed to determine VM for building." * * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=dev-lang/scala-2.9.2'`, * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv '=dev-lang/scala-2.9.2'`. * The complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/scala-2.9.2/temp/build.log'. * The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/scala-2.9.2/temp/die.env'. * Working directory: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/scala-2.9.2' * S: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/scala-2.9.2/work/scala-2.9.2-sources' The following eix output may help: % eix java-virtuals/jdk-with-com-sun [I] java-virtuals/jdk-with-com-sun Available versions: 20111111 {{ELIBC="FreeBSD"}} Installed versions: 20111111(16:08:51 18/04/12)(ELIBC="-FreeBSD") Homepage: http://www.gentoo.org Description: Virtual ebuilds that require internal com.sun classes from a JDK Both virtual jdks 1.6 and 1.7 are installed: % eix virtual/jdk [I] virtual/jdk Available versions: (1.4) ~1.4.2-r1[1] (1.5) 1.5.0 ~1.5.0-r3[1] (1.6) 1.6.0 1.6.0-r1 (1.7) (~)1.7.0 Installed versions: 1.6.0-r1(1.6)(23:22:48 10/11/12) 1.7.0(1.7)(23:21:09 10/11/12) Description: Virtual for JDK [1] "java-overlay" /var/lib/layman/java-overlay

  Read the article

• Wine not finding some files

  - by Levans

  I'm having strange issues with Wine : If I look a C:\windows\system32\drivers\ in wine explorer, the directory looks empty, while the directory ~/.wine/drive_c/windows/system32/drivers is not. Plus, having the H: drive mapped to my home directory, I can look at H:\.wine\drive_c\windows\system32\drivers and it is not empty, the files are here ! Thus it seems Wine has the rights to access these files. So why don't they appear on the C: drive ? Some of my programs need them. I'm using Gentoo Linux, and Wine is version 1.7.0 compiled with these useflags (from eix) : X alsa cups fontconfig gecko jpeg lcms ldap mono mp3 ncurses nls openal opengl perl png prelink run-exes ssl threads truetype udisks xcomposite xinerama xml -capi -custom-cflags -dos -gphoto2 -gsm -gstreamer -odbc -opencl -osmesa -oss -pulseaudio -samba -scanner -selinux -test -v4l ABI_MIPS="-n32 -n64 -o32" ABI_X86="32 64 -x32" ELIBC="glibc" EDIT: I just updated to wine 1.7.4 and nothing changed.

  Read the article

1