Search Results

Search found 88144 results on 3526 pages for 'first class functions'.

Page 1/3526 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • c++ casting base class to derived class mess

    - by alan2here
    If I were to create a base class called base and derived classes called derived_1, derived_2 etc... I use a collection of instances of the base class, then when I retrieved an element and tried to use it I would find that C++ thinks it's type is that of the base class, probably because I retrieved it from a std::vector of base. Which is a problem when I want to use features that only exist for the specific derived class who's type I knew this object was when I put it into the vector. So I cast the element into the type it is supposed to be and found this wouldn't work. (derived_3)obj_to_be_fixed; And remembered that it's a pointer thing. After some tweaking this now worked. *((derived_3*)&obj_to_be_fixed); Is this right or is there for example an abc_cast() function that does it with less mess?

    Read the article

  • class hierarchy design for small java project

    - by user523956
    I have written a java code which does following:- Main goal is to fetch emails from (inbox, spam) folders and store them in database. It fetches emails from gmail,gmx,web.de,yahoo and Hotmail. Following attributes are stored in mysql database. Slno, messagedigest, messageid, foldername, dateandtime, receiver, sender, subject, cc, size and emlfile. For gmail,gmy and web.de, I have used javamail API, because email form it can be fetched with IMAP. For yahoo and hotmail, I have used html parser and httpclient to fetch emails form spam folder and for inbox folder, I have used pop3 javamail API. I want to have proper class hierarchy which makes my code efficient and easily reusable. As of now I have designed class hierarchy as below: I am sure it can still be improved. So I would like to have different opinions on it. I have following classes and methods as of now. MainController:- Here I pass emailid, password and foldername from which emails have to be fetched. Abstract Class :-EmailProtocol Abstract Methods of it (All methods except executeParser contains method definition):- connectImap() // used by gmx,gmail and web.de email ids connectPop3() // used by hotmail and yahoo to fetch emails of inbox folder createMessageDigest // used by every email provider(gmx, gmail,web.de,yahoo,hotmail) establishDBConnection // used by every email emailAlreadyExists // used by every email which checks whether email already exists in db or not, if not then store it. storeemailproperties // used by every email to store emails properties to mysql database executeParser // nothing written in it. Overwridden and used by just hotmail and yahoo to fetch emails form spam folder. Imap extends EmailProtocol (nothing in it. But I have to have it to access methods of EmailProtocol. This is used to fetch emails from gmail,gmx and web.de) I know this is really a bad way but don't know how to do it other way. Hotmsil extends EmailProtocol Methods:- executeParser() :- This is used by just hotmail email id. fetchjunkemails() :- This is also very specific for only hotmail email id. Yahoo extends EmailProtocol Methods:- executeParser() storeEmailtotemptable() MoveEmailtoInbox() getFoldername() nullorEquals() All above methods are specific for yahoo email id. public DateTimeFormat(class) format() //this formats datetime of gmax,gmail and web.de emails. formatYahoodate //this formats datetime of yahoo email. formatHotmaildate // this formats datetime of hotmail email. public StringFormat ConvertStreamToString() // Accessed by every class except DateTimeFormat class. formatFromTo() // Accessed by every class except DateTimeFormat class. public Class CheckDatabaseExistance public static void checkForDatabaseTablesAvailability() (This method checks at the beginnning whether database and required tables exist in mysql or not. if not it creates them) Please see code of my MainController class so that You can have an idea about how I use different classes. public class MainController { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { ArrayList<String> web_de_folders = new ArrayList<String>(); web_de_folders.add("INBOX"); web_de_folders.add("Unbekannt"); web_de_folders.add("Spam"); web_de_folders.add("OUTBOX"); web_de_folders.add("SENT"); web_de_folders.add("DRAFTS"); web_de_folders.add("TRASH"); web_de_folders.add("Trash"); ArrayList<String> gmx_folders = new ArrayList<String>(); gmx_folders.add("INBOX"); gmx_folders.add("Archiv"); gmx_folders.add("Entwürfe"); gmx_folders.add("Gelöscht"); gmx_folders.add("Gesendet"); gmx_folders.add("Spamverdacht"); gmx_folders.add("Trash"); ArrayList<String> gmail_folders = new ArrayList<String>(); gmail_folders.add("Inbox"); gmail_folders.add("[Google Mail]/Spam"); gmail_folders.add("[Google Mail]/Trash"); gmail_folders.add("[Google Mail]/Sent Mail"); ArrayList<String> pop3_folders = new ArrayList<String>(); pop3_folders.add("INBOX"); CheckDatabaseExistance.checkForDatabaseTablesAvailability(); EmailProtocol imap = new Imap(); System.out.println("CHECKING FOR NEW EMAILS IN WEB.DE...(IMAP)"); System.out.println("*********************************************************************************"); imap.connectImap("[email protected]", "pwd", web_de_folders); System.out.println("\nCHECKING FOR NEW EMAILS IN GMX.DE...(IMAP)"); System.out.println("*********************************************************************************"); imap.connectImap("[email protected]", "pwd", gmx_folders); System.out.println("\nCHECKING FOR NEW EMAILS IN GMAIL...(IMAP)"); System.out.println("*********************************************************************************"); imap.connectImap("[email protected]", "pwd", gmail_folders); EmailProtocol yahoo = new Yahoo(); Yahoo y=new Yahoo(); System.out.println("\nEXECUTING YAHOO PARSER"); System.out.println("*********************************************************************************"); y.executeParser("http://de.mc1321.mail.yahoo.com/mc/welcome?ymv=0","[email protected]","pwd"); System.out.println("\nCHECKING FOR NEW EMAILS IN INBOX OF YAHOO (POP3)"); System.out.println("*********************************************************************************"); yahoo.connectPop3("[email protected]","pwd",pop3_folders); System.out.println("\nCHECKING FOR NEW EMAILS IN INBOX OF HOTMAIL (POP3)"); System.out.println("*********************************************************************************"); yahoo.connectPop3("[email protected]","pwd",pop3_folders); EmailProtocol hotmail = new Hotmail(); Hotmail h=new Hotmail(); System.out.println("\nEXECUTING HOTMAIL PARSER"); System.out.println("*********************************************************************************"); h.executeParser("https://login.live.com/ppsecure/post.srf","[email protected]","pwd"); } } I have kept DatetimeFormat and StringFormat class public so that I can access its public methods by just (DatetimeFormat.formatYahoodate for e.g. from different methods). This is the first time I have developed something in java. It serves its purpose but of course code is still not so efficient I think. I need your suggestions on this project.

    Read the article

  • Class Design and Structure Online Web Store

    - by Phorce
    I hope I have asked this in the right forum. Basically, we're designing an Online Store and I am designing the class structure for ordering a product and want some clarification on what I have so far: So a customer comes, selects their product, chooses the quantity and selects 'Purchase' (I am using the Facade Pattern - So subsystems execute when this action is performed). My class structure: < Order > < Product > <Customer > There is no inheritance, more Association < Order has < Product , < Customer has < Order . Does this structure look ok? I've noticed that I don't handle the "Quantity" separately, I was just going to add this into the "Product" class, but, do you think it should be a class of it's own? Hope someone can help.

    Read the article

  • UML - Class Diagrams Order -> Products

    - by Phorce
    I have a class diagram that is like this: < Order > (1) CAN HAVE (M) < products > But therefore "Order" has the following: Order_Id Customer_Id Order_date_day Order_date_month Order_date_yeah But I do not know how it would handle the Products? Because, I couldn't have "ProductID" because that would mean that each item in this class would have to have a separate instance for each product (E.g. someone ordered 100 products, but only placed 1 order). Could I have an Product object in class Order? If so, how do you represent that in UML? Thank you

    Read the article

  • UML Class Diagram: Abstract or Interface?

    - by J Smith
    I am modeling a class diagram and have spotted an opportunity to simplify it slightly. What I want to know is, would this it be better to implement an abstract class or an interface? The scenario is this, I have the classes: Artist Genre Album Song All of which share the methods getName, setName, and getCount (playcount that is). Would it be best to create an abstract 'Music' class with the aforementioned abstract methods, or should I create an interface, since the classes that implement the interface have to include all of the interface's methods (I think, correct me if I'm wrong). I hope I've given enough detail, please ask questions if I haven't. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Abstract Base Class or Class?

    - by Mohit Deshpande
    For my semester project, my team and I are supposed to make a .jar file (library, not runnable) that contains a game development framework and demonstrate the concepts of OOP. Its supposed to be a FRAMEWORK and another team is supposed to use our framework and vice-versa. So I want to know how we should start. We thought of several approaches: 1. Start with a plain class public class Enemy { public Enemy(int x, int y, int health, int attack, ...) { ... } ... } public class UserDefinedClass extends Enemy { ... } 2. Start with an abstract class that user-defined enemies have to inherit abstract members public abstract class Enemy { public Enemy(int x, int y, int health, int attack, ...) { ... } public abstract void draw(); public abstract void destroy(); ... } public class UserDefinedClass extends Enemy { ... public void draw() { ... } public void destroy() { ... } } 3. Create a super ABC (Abstract Base Class) that ALL inherit from public abstract class VectorEntity { ... } public abstract class Enemy extends VectorEntity { ... } public class Player extends VectorEntity { ... } public class UserDefinedClass extends Enemy { ... } Which should I use? Or is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • Class Design for special business rules

    - by Samuel Front
    I'm developing an application that allows people to place custom manufacturing orders. However, while most require similar paperwork, some of them have custom paperwork that only they require. My current class design has a Manufacturer class, of which of one of the member variables is an array of RequiredSubmission objects. However, there are two issues that I am somewhat concerned about. First, some manufacturers are willing to accept either a standard form or their own custom form. I'm thinking of storing this in the RequiredSubmission object, with an array of alternate forms that are a valid substitute. I'm not sure that this is ideal, however. The major issue, however, is that some manufacturers have deadline cycles. For example, forms A, B and C have to be delivered by January 1, while payment must be rendered by January 10. If you miss those, you'll have to wait until the next cycle. I'm not exactly sure how I can get this to work with my existing classes—how can I say "this set of dates all belong to the same cycle, with date A for form A, date B for form B, etc." I would greatly appreciate any insights on how to best design these classes.

    Read the article

  • Nested class - calling the nested class from the parent class

    - by insanepaul
    I have a class whereby a method calls a nested class. I want to access the parent class properties from within the nested class. public class ParentClass { private x; private y; private z; something.something = new ChildClass public class ChildClass { need to get x, y and z; } } How do I access x,y and z from within the child class. Something to do with referencing the parent class but how? }

    Read the article

  • Class design, One class in two sources

    - by Pavla
    Is it possible define methods from the same class in different "CPP" files? I have header file "myClass.h" with: class myClass { public: // methods for counting ... // methods for other ... }; I would like to define "methods for counting" in one CPP and "methods for other" in other CPP. For clarity. Both groups of methods sometime use the same attributes. Is it possible? Thanks :).

    Read the article

  • DIV is picking max-width value as width value for DIV.

    - by Lokesh
    I am facing a problem after applying max-width hack for IE7. In mozilla, width of the div is flexible and adjustable as per the image width in the div. But in IE7 it is taking the max-width as width of DIV. Below is my HTML code: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all" href="style/food.css" /> <!--[if IE 7]> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="screen" href="style/ie7.css" /> <![endif]--> </head> <body> <div class="main_content_inner_ko"> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/><div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/chicken/PremCrispyChickenRanchBLT.png" height="115" width="115" alt="Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT"/><div class="small_title">Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/sandwiches/FiletOFish.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Filet O Fish"/> <div class="small_title">Filet O Fish</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/chicken/PremCrispyChickenRanchBLT.png" height="115" width="115" alt="Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT"/> <div class="small_title">Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/sandwiches/FiletOFish.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Filet O Fish"/> <div class="small_title">Filet O Fish</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/sandwiches/FiletOFish.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Filet O Fish"/> <div class="small_title">Filet O Fish</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/chicken/PremCrispyChickenRanchBLT.png" height="115" width="115" alt="Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT"/> <div class="small_title">Premium Cripsy Chicken Ranch BLT</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_images/x115/sandwiches/FiletOFish.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Filet O Fish"/> <div class="small_title">Filet O Fish</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="product_item"> <img src="images/product_icons/BigNTasty.png" height="115" width="99" alt="Big N&rsquo; Tasty"/> <div class="small_title">Big N&rsquo; Tasty</div> <table class="product_information" cellpadding="0" border="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td class="red_bold"></td> <td></td> <td class="small_italic">(Daily Value)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Calories</td> <td>460</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Total Fat</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic">(37%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Carbs</td> <td>37g</td> <td class="small_italic">(12%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Protein</td> <td>24g</td> <td class="small_italic"></td> </tr> <tr> <td class="red_bold">Sodium</td> <td>720mg</td> <td class="small_italic">(30%)</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="3" class="notes">Note: Values shown are for the default size and/or flavor.</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_learn_more_and_customize"></a></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="3"><a href="#" class="acts_as_button en_add_to_my_meal_builder"></a></td></tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <div class="clear"></div> </div> </body> Below is the css code: div.small_title { font-size: 10px; color: #929292; text-align: center; max-width: 115px; line-height: 13px; padding-top: 5px; margin: 0 auto; } .product_item { position: relative; float:left; min-width: 35px; max-width: 189px; width: auto !important; text-align:center; border: 1px solid #CCC; } Please help me! Cheers!! Lokesh Yadav

    Read the article

  • In Ruby are there any related applications of the syntax: class << self ... end

    - by pez_dispenser
    class << self attr_accessor :n, :totalX, :totalY end The syntax above is used for defining class instance variables. But when I think about what syntax implies, it doesn't make any sense to me, so I'm wondering if this type of syntax is used for any other types of definitions. My point of confusion here is this: class << self The append operator normally means "add what's on the right to the object on the left". But in the context of this block, how does that add up to "put the contents of this block into the definition of the class instance rather than the instance"? For the same reason I'm confused as to why in one context class << self can define class instance variables while in another it seems to create class variables such as here: class Point # Instance methods go here class << self # Class methods go here end end

    Read the article

  • Inheritance Mapping Strategies with Entity Framework Code First CTP5 Part 1: Table per Hierarchy (TPH)

    - by mortezam
    A simple strategy for mapping classes to database tables might be “one table for every entity persistent class.” This approach sounds simple enough and, indeed, works well until we encounter inheritance. Inheritance is such a visible structural mismatch between the object-oriented and relational worlds because object-oriented systems model both “is a” and “has a” relationships. SQL-based models provide only "has a" relationships between entities; SQL database management systems don’t support type inheritance—and even when it’s available, it’s usually proprietary or incomplete. There are three different approaches to representing an inheritance hierarchy: Table per Hierarchy (TPH): Enable polymorphism by denormalizing the SQL schema, and utilize a type discriminator column that holds type information. Table per Type (TPT): Represent "is a" (inheritance) relationships as "has a" (foreign key) relationships. Table per Concrete class (TPC): Discard polymorphism and inheritance relationships completely from the SQL schema.I will explain each of these strategies in a series of posts and this one is dedicated to TPH. In this series we'll deeply dig into each of these strategies and will learn about "why" to choose them as well as "how" to implement them. Hopefully it will give you a better idea about which strategy to choose in a particular scenario. Inheritance Mapping with Entity Framework Code FirstAll of the inheritance mapping strategies that we discuss in this series will be implemented by EF Code First CTP5. The CTP5 build of the new EF Code First library has been released by ADO.NET team earlier this month. EF Code-First enables a pretty powerful code-centric development workflow for working with data. I’m a big fan of the EF Code First approach, and I’m pretty excited about a lot of productivity and power that it brings. When it comes to inheritance mapping, not only Code First fully supports all the strategies but also gives you ultimate flexibility to work with domain models that involves inheritance. The fluent API for inheritance mapping in CTP5 has been improved a lot and now it's more intuitive and concise in compare to CTP4. A Note For Those Who Follow Other Entity Framework ApproachesIf you are following EF's "Database First" or "Model First" approaches, I still recommend to read this series since although the implementation is Code First specific but the explanations around each of the strategies is perfectly applied to all approaches be it Code First or others. A Note For Those Who are New to Entity Framework and Code-FirstIf you choose to learn EF you've chosen well. If you choose to learn EF with Code First you've done even better. To get started, you can find a great walkthrough by Scott Guthrie here and another one by ADO.NET team here. In this post, I assume you already setup your machine to do Code First development and also that you are familiar with Code First fundamentals and basic concepts. You might also want to check out my other posts on EF Code First like Complex Types and Shared Primary Key Associations. A Top Down Development ScenarioThese posts take a top-down approach; it assumes that you’re starting with a domain model and trying to derive a new SQL schema. Therefore, we start with an existing domain model, implement it in C# and then let Code First create the database schema for us. However, the mapping strategies described are just as relevant if you’re working bottom up, starting with existing database tables. I’ll show some tricks along the way that help you dealing with nonperfect table layouts. Let’s start with the mapping of entity inheritance. -- The Domain ModelIn our domain model, we have a BillingDetail base class which is abstract (note the italic font on the UML class diagram below). We do allow various billing types and represent them as subclasses of BillingDetail class. As for now, we support CreditCard and BankAccount: Implement the Object Model with Code First As always, we start with the POCO classes. Note that in our DbContext, I only define one DbSet for the base class which is BillingDetail. Code First will find the other classes in the hierarchy based on Reachability Convention. public abstract class BillingDetail  {     public int BillingDetailId { get; set; }     public string Owner { get; set; }             public string Number { get; set; } } public class BankAccount : BillingDetail {     public string BankName { get; set; }     public string Swift { get; set; } } public class CreditCard : BillingDetail {     public int CardType { get; set; }                     public string ExpiryMonth { get; set; }     public string ExpiryYear { get; set; } } public class InheritanceMappingContext : DbContext {     public DbSet<BillingDetail> BillingDetails { get; set; } } This object model is all that is needed to enable inheritance with Code First. If you put this in your application you would be able to immediately start working with the database and do CRUD operations. Before going into details about how EF Code First maps this object model to the database, we need to learn about one of the core concepts of inheritance mapping: polymorphic and non-polymorphic queries. Polymorphic Queries LINQ to Entities and EntitySQL, as object-oriented query languages, both support polymorphic queries—that is, queries for instances of a class and all instances of its subclasses, respectively. For example, consider the following query: IQueryable<BillingDetail> linqQuery = from b in context.BillingDetails select b; List<BillingDetail> billingDetails = linqQuery.ToList(); Or the same query in EntitySQL: string eSqlQuery = @"SELECT VAlUE b FROM BillingDetails AS b"; ObjectQuery<BillingDetail> objectQuery = ((IObjectContextAdapter)context).ObjectContext                                                                          .CreateQuery<BillingDetail>(eSqlQuery); List<BillingDetail> billingDetails = objectQuery.ToList(); linqQuery and eSqlQuery are both polymorphic and return a list of objects of the type BillingDetail, which is an abstract class but the actual concrete objects in the list are of the subtypes of BillingDetail: CreditCard and BankAccount. Non-polymorphic QueriesAll LINQ to Entities and EntitySQL queries are polymorphic which return not only instances of the specific entity class to which it refers, but all subclasses of that class as well. On the other hand, Non-polymorphic queries are queries whose polymorphism is restricted and only returns instances of a particular subclass. In LINQ to Entities, this can be specified by using OfType<T>() Method. For example, the following query returns only instances of BankAccount: IQueryable<BankAccount> query = from b in context.BillingDetails.OfType<BankAccount>() select b; EntitySQL has OFTYPE operator that does the same thing: string eSqlQuery = @"SELECT VAlUE b FROM OFTYPE(BillingDetails, Model.BankAccount) AS b"; In fact, the above query with OFTYPE operator is a short form of the following query expression that uses TREAT and IS OF operators: string eSqlQuery = @"SELECT VAlUE TREAT(b as Model.BankAccount)                       FROM BillingDetails AS b                       WHERE b IS OF(Model.BankAccount)"; (Note that in the above query, Model.BankAccount is the fully qualified name for BankAccount class. You need to change "Model" with your own namespace name.) Table per Class Hierarchy (TPH)An entire class hierarchy can be mapped to a single table. This table includes columns for all properties of all classes in the hierarchy. The concrete subclass represented by a particular row is identified by the value of a type discriminator column. You don’t have to do anything special in Code First to enable TPH. It's the default inheritance mapping strategy: This mapping strategy is a winner in terms of both performance and simplicity. It’s the best-performing way to represent polymorphism—both polymorphic and nonpolymorphic queries perform well—and it’s even easy to implement by hand. Ad-hoc reporting is possible without complex joins or unions. Schema evolution is straightforward. Discriminator Column As you can see in the DB schema above, Code First has to add a special column to distinguish between persistent classes: the discriminator. This isn’t a property of the persistent class in our object model; it’s used internally by EF Code First. By default, the column name is "Discriminator", and its type is string. The values defaults to the persistent class names —in this case, “BankAccount” or “CreditCard”. EF Code First automatically sets and retrieves the discriminator values. TPH Requires Properties in SubClasses to be Nullable in the Database TPH has one major problem: Columns for properties declared by subclasses will be nullable in the database. For example, Code First created an (INT, NULL) column to map CardType property in CreditCard class. However, in a typical mapping scenario, Code First always creates an (INT, NOT NULL) column in the database for an int property in persistent class. But in this case, since BankAccount instance won’t have a CardType property, the CardType field must be NULL for that row so Code First creates an (INT, NULL) instead. If your subclasses each define several non-nullable properties, the loss of NOT NULL constraints may be a serious problem from the point of view of data integrity. TPH Violates the Third Normal FormAnother important issue is normalization. We’ve created functional dependencies between nonkey columns, violating the third normal form. Basically, the value of Discriminator column determines the corresponding values of the columns that belong to the subclasses (e.g. BankName) but Discriminator is not part of the primary key for the table. As always, denormalization for performance can be misleading, because it sacrifices long-term stability, maintainability, and the integrity of data for immediate gains that may be also achieved by proper optimization of the SQL execution plans (in other words, ask your DBA). Generated SQL QueryLet's take a look at the SQL statements that EF Code First sends to the database when we write queries in LINQ to Entities or EntitySQL. For example, the polymorphic query for BillingDetails that you saw, generates the following SQL statement: SELECT  [Extent1].[Discriminator] AS [Discriminator],  [Extent1].[BillingDetailId] AS [BillingDetailId],  [Extent1].[Owner] AS [Owner],  [Extent1].[Number] AS [Number],  [Extent1].[BankName] AS [BankName],  [Extent1].[Swift] AS [Swift],  [Extent1].[CardType] AS [CardType],  [Extent1].[ExpiryMonth] AS [ExpiryMonth],  [Extent1].[ExpiryYear] AS [ExpiryYear] FROM [dbo].[BillingDetails] AS [Extent1] WHERE [Extent1].[Discriminator] IN ('BankAccount','CreditCard') Or the non-polymorphic query for the BankAccount subclass generates this SQL statement: SELECT  [Extent1].[BillingDetailId] AS [BillingDetailId],  [Extent1].[Owner] AS [Owner],  [Extent1].[Number] AS [Number],  [Extent1].[BankName] AS [BankName],  [Extent1].[Swift] AS [Swift] FROM [dbo].[BillingDetails] AS [Extent1] WHERE [Extent1].[Discriminator] = 'BankAccount' Note how Code First adds a restriction on the discriminator column and also how it only selects those columns that belong to BankAccount entity. Change Discriminator Column Data Type and Values With Fluent API Sometimes, especially in legacy schemas, you need to override the conventions for the discriminator column so that Code First can work with the schema. The following fluent API code will change the discriminator column name to "BillingDetailType" and the values to "BA" and "CC" for BankAccount and CreditCard respectively: protected override void OnModelCreating(System.Data.Entity.ModelConfiguration.ModelBuilder modelBuilder) {     modelBuilder.Entity<BillingDetail>()                 .Map<BankAccount>(m => m.Requires("BillingDetailType").HasValue("BA"))                 .Map<CreditCard>(m => m.Requires("BillingDetailType").HasValue("CC")); } Also, changing the data type of discriminator column is interesting. In the above code, we passed strings to HasValue method but this method has been defined to accepts a type of object: public void HasValue(object value); Therefore, if for example we pass a value of type int to it then Code First not only use our desired values (i.e. 1 & 2) in the discriminator column but also changes the column type to be (INT, NOT NULL): modelBuilder.Entity<BillingDetail>()             .Map<BankAccount>(m => m.Requires("BillingDetailType").HasValue(1))             .Map<CreditCard>(m => m.Requires("BillingDetailType").HasValue(2)); SummaryIn this post we learned about Table per Hierarchy as the default mapping strategy in Code First. The disadvantages of the TPH strategy may be too serious for your design—after all, denormalized schemas can become a major burden in the long run. Your DBA may not like it at all. In the next post, we will learn about Table per Type (TPT) strategy that doesn’t expose you to this problem. References ADO.NET team blog Java Persistence with Hibernate book a { text-decoration: none; } a:visited { color: Blue; } .title { padding-bottom: 5px; font-family: Segoe UI; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold; padding-top: 15px; } .code, .typeName { font-family: consolas; } .typeName { color: #2b91af; } .padTop5 { padding-top: 5px; } .padTop10 { padding-top: 10px; } p.MsoNormal { margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 10.0pt; margin-left: 0in; line-height: 115%; font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: "Calibri" , "sans-serif"; }

    Read the article

  • UML class diagram - can aggregated object be part of two aggregated classes?

    - by user970696
    Some sources say that aggregation means that the class owns the object and shares reference. Lets assume an example where a company class holds a list of cars but departments of that company has list of cars used by them. class Department { list<Car> listOfCars; } class Company { list<Car> listOfCars; //initialization of the list } So in UML class diagram, I would do it like this. But I assume this is not allowed because it would imply that both company and department own the objects.. [COMPANY]<>------[CAR] [DEPARTMENT]<>---| //imagine this goes up to the car class

    Read the article

  • Base class -> Derived class and vice-versa conversions in C++

    - by Ivan Nikolaev
    Hi! I have the following example code: #include <iostream> #include <string> using namespace std; class Event { public: string type; string source; }; class KeyEvent : public Event { public: string key; string modifier; }; class MouseEvent : public Event { public: string button; int x; int y; }; void handleEvent(KeyEvent e) { if(e.key == "ENTER") cout << "Hello world! The Enter key was pressed ;)" << endl; } Event generateEvent() { KeyEvent e; e.type = "KEYBOARD_EVENT"; e.source = "Keyboard0"; e.key = "SPACEBAR"; e.modifier = "none"; return e; } int main() { KeyEvent e = generateEvent(); return 0; } I can't compile it, G++ throws an error of kind: main.cpp: In function 'int main()': main.cpp:47:29: error: conversion from 'Event' to non-scalar type 'KeyEvent' requested I know that the error is obvious for C++ guru's, but I can't understand why I can't do the conversion from base class object to derived one. Can someone suggest me the solution of the problem that I have? Thx in advice

    Read the article

  • 'abstract class' versus 'normal class' for a reusable library

    - by Greg
    I'm developing a reusable library and have been creating abstract classes, so the client can then extend from these. QUESTION: Is there any reason in fact I should use an abstract class here as opposed to just a normal class? Note - Have already decided I do not want to use interfaces as I want to include actual default methods in my library so the client using it doesn't have to write the code.

    Read the article

  • Looking into Entity Framework Code First Migrations

    - by nikolaosk
    In this post I will introduce you to Code First Migrations, an Entity Framework feature introduced in version 4.3 back in February of 2012.I have extensively covered Entity Framework in this blog. Please find my other Entity Framework posts here .   Before the addition of Code First Migrations (4.1,4.2 versions), Code First database initialisation meant that Code First would create the database if it does not exist (the default behaviour - CreateDatabaseIfNotExists). The other pattern we could use is DropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges which means that Entity Framework, will drop the database if it realises that model has changes since the last time it created the database.The final pattern is DropCreateDatabaseAlways which means that Code First will recreate the database every time one runs the application.That is of course fine for the development database but totally unacceptable and catastrophic when you have a production database. We cannot lose our data because of the work that Code First works.Migrations solve this problem.With migrations we can modify the database without completely dropping it.We can modify the database schema to reflect the changes to the model without losing data.In version EF 5.0 migrations are fully included and supported. I will demonstrate migrations with a hands-on example.Let me say a few words first about Entity Framework first. The .Net framework provides support for Object Relational Mappingthrough EF. So EF is a an ORM tool and it is now the main data access technology that microsoft works on. I use it quite extensively in my projects. Through EF we have many things out of the box provided for us. We have the automatic generation of SQL code.It maps relational data to strongly types objects.All the changes made to the objects in the memory are persisted in a transactional way back to the data store. You can find in this post an example on how to use the Entity Framework to retrieve data from an SQL Server Database using the "Database/Schema First" approach.In this approach we make all the changes at the database level and then we update the model with those changes. In this post you can see an example on how to use the "Model First" approach when working with ASP.Net and the Entity Framework.This model was firstly introduced in EF version 4.0 and we could start with a blank model and then create a database from that model.When we made changes to the model , we could recreate the database from the new model. The Code First approach is the more code-centric than the other two. Basically we write POCO classes and then we persist to a database using something called DBContext.Code First relies on DbContext. We create 2,3 classes (e.g Person,Product) with properties and then these classes interact with the DbContext class we can create a new database based upon our POCOS classes and have tables generated from those classes.We do not have an .edmx file in this approach.By using this approach we can write much easier unit tests.DbContext is a new context class and is smaller,lightweight wrapper for the main context class which is ObjectContext (Schema First and Model First).Let's move on to our hands-on example.I have installed VS 2012 Ultimate edition in my Windows 8 machine. 1)  Create an empty asp.net web application. Give your application a suitable name. Choose C# as the development language2) Add a new web form item in your application. Leave the default name.3) Create a new folder. Name it CodeFirst .4) Add a new item in your application, a class file. Name it Footballer.cs. This is going to be a simple POCO class.Place this class file in the CodeFirst folder.The code follows    public class Footballer     {         public int FootballerID { get; set; }         public string FirstName { get; set; }         public string LastName { get; set; }         public double Weight { get; set; }         public double Height { get; set; }              }5) We will have to add EF 5.0 to our project. Right-click on the project in the Solution Explorer and select Manage NuGet Packages... for it.In the window that will pop up search for Entity Framework and install it.Have a look at the picture below   If you want to find out if indeed EF version is 5.0 version is installed have a look at the References. Have a look at the picture below to see what you will see if you have installed everything correctly.Have a look at the picture below 6) Then we need to create a context class that inherits from DbContext.Add a new class to the CodeFirst folder.Name it FootballerDBContext.Now that we have the entity classes created, we must let the model know.I will have to use the DbSet<T> property.The code for this class follows     public class FootballerDBContext:DbContext     {         public DbSet<Footballer> Footballers { get; set; }             }    Do not forget to add  (using System.Data.Entity;) in the beginning of the class file 7) We must take care of the connection string. It is very easy to create one in the web.config.It does not matter that we do not have a database yet.When we run the DbContext and query against it , it will use a connection string in the web.config and will create the database based on the classes.I will use the name "FootballTraining" for the database.In my case the connection string inside the web.config, looks like this    <connectionStrings>    <add name="CodeFirstDBContext" connectionString="server=.;integrated security=true; database=FootballTraining" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"/>                       </connectionStrings>8) Now it is time to create Linq to Entities queries to retrieve data from the database . Add a new class to your application in the CodeFirst folder.Name the file DALfootballer.csWe will create a simple public method to retrieve the footballers. The code for the class followspublic class DALfootballer     {         FootballerDBContext ctx = new FootballerDBContext();         public List<Footballer> GetFootballers()         {             var query = from player in ctx.Footballers select player;             return query.ToList();         }     } 9) Place a GridView control on the Default.aspx page and leave the default name.Add an ObjectDataSource control on the Default.aspx page and leave the default name. Set the DatasourceID property of the GridView control to the ID of the ObjectDataSource control.(DataSourceID="ObjectDataSource1" ). Let's configure the ObjectDataSource control. Click on the smart tag item of the ObjectDataSource control and select Configure Data Source. In the Wizzard that pops up select the DALFootballer class and then in the next step choose the GetFootballers() method.Click Finish to complete the steps of the wizzard.Build and Run your application.  10) Obviously you will not see any records coming back from your database, because we have not inserted anything. The database is created, though.Have a look at the picture below.  11) Now let's change the POCO class. Let's add a new property to the Footballer.cs class.        public int Age { get; set; } Build and run your application again. You will receive an error. Have a look at the picture below 12) That was to be expected.EF Code First Migrations is not activated by default. We have to activate them manually and configure them according to your needs. We will open the Package Manager Console from the Tools menu within Visual Studio 2012.Then we will activate the EF Code First Migration Features by writing the command “Enable-Migrations”.  Have a look at the picture below. This adds a new folder Migrations in our project. A new auto-generated class Configuration.cs is created.Another class is also created [CURRENTDATE]_InitialCreate.cs and added to our project.The Configuration.cs  is shown in the picture below. The [CURRENTDATE]_InitialCreate.cs is shown in the picture below  13) ??w we are ready to migrate the changes in the database. We need to run the Add-Migration Age command in Package Manager ConsoleAdd-Migration will scaffold the next migration based on changes you have made to your model since the last migration was created.In the Migrations folder, the file 201211201231066_Age.cs is created.Have a look at the picture below to see the newly generated file and its contents. Now we can run the Update-Database command in Package Manager Console .See the picture above.Code First Migrations will compare the migrations in our Migrations folder with the ones that have been applied to the database. It will see that the Age migration needs to be applied, and run it.The EFMigrations.CodeFirst.FootballeDBContext database is now updated to include the Age column in the Footballers table.Build and run your application.Everything will work fine now.Have a look at the picture below to see the migrations applied to our table. 14) We may want it to automatically upgrade the database (by applying any pending migrations) when the application launches.Let's add another property to our Poco class.          public string TShirtNo { get; set; }We want this change to migrate automatically to the database.We go to the Configuration.cs we enable automatic migrations.     public Configuration()        {            AutomaticMigrationsEnabled = true;        } In the Page_Load event handling routine we have to register the MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion database initializer. A database initializer simply contains some logic that is used to make sure the database is setup correctly.   protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)        {            Database.SetInitializer(new MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion<FootballerDBContext, Configuration>());        } Build and run your application. It will work fine. Have a look at the picture below to see the migrations applied to our table in the database. Hope it helps!!!  

    Read the article

  • Functions inside page using Razor View Engine – ASP.NET MVC

    - by hajan
    As we already know, Razor is probably the best view engine for ASP.NET MVC so far. It keeps your code fluid and very expressive. Besides the other functionalities Razor has, it also supports writing local functions. If you want to write a function, you can’t just open new @{ } razor block and write it there… it won’t work. Instead, you should specify @functions { } so that inside the brackets you will write your own C#/VB.NET functions/methods. Lets see an example: 1. I have the following loop that prints data using Razor <ul> @{     int N = 10;     for (int i = 1; i<=N; i++)     {         <li>Number @i</li>     }     } </ul> This code will print the numbers from 1 to 10: Number 1 Number 2 Number 3 Number 4 Number 5 Number 6 Number 7 Number 8 Number 9 Number 10 So, now lets write a function that will check if current number is even, if yes… add Even before Number word. Function in Razor @functions{     public bool isEven(int number)     {         return number % 2 == 0 ? true : false;     } } The modified code which creates unordered list is: <ul> @{     int N = 10;     for (int i = 1; i<=N; i++)     {         if (isEven(@i)) {             <li>Even number @i</li>         }         else {             <li>Number @i</li>         }                 }             } </ul> As you can see, in the modified code we use the isEven(@i) function to check if the current number is even or not… The result is: Number 1 Even number 2 Number 3 Even number 4 Number 5 Even number 6 Number 7 Even number 8 Number 9 Even number 10 So, the main point of this blog was to show how you can define your own functions inside page using Razor View Engine. Of course you can define multiple functions inside the same @functions { } defined razor statement. The complete code: @{     Layout = null; } <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head>     <title>ASP.NET MVC - Razor View Engine :: Functions</title> </head> <body>     <div>         <ul>         @{             int N = 10;             for (int i = 1; i<=N; i++)             {                 if (isEven(@i)) {                     <li>Even number @i</li>                 }                 else {                     <li>Number @i</li>                 }                         }                     }         </ul>         @functions{             public bool isEven(int number)             {                 return number % 2 == 0 ? true : false;             }         }     </div> </body> </html> Hope you like it. Regards, Hajan

    Read the article

  • Network programming under windows: is WSA functions can be more complete than pSock functions [on hold]

    - by Kane
    I plan to make a set of classic socket functions to simplify their usages. Since i work under windows and linux indifferently i usually make it portable (it's not my first version of this set of functions), but i want to do something different this time and dedicate one version to windows, and one other to linux. With that i wonder for the windows version, if the WSA* functions can have any interest using them instead of the psock ones. I have found nothing about a comparison between them, so if any of you have any idea, suggestion, link or benchmark ?

    Read the article

  • Code First / Database First / Model First : are they just personnal preferences?

    - by Antoine M
    Merely knowing the internal functionality of each approaches, and after reading a lot of posts, I still can't figure out if each one of them is just a matter of personnal preference for the developper or if they deserve different axes of productivity ? Does one of them should be applyed for some specific productivity needs or MS is just beeing kind offering three different flavours ? Should we consider CF as a sort of improvement over DBF or MF and thinking of it as a futur standard on wich spending a peculiar intelectual investment ... ? Is there a link showing a sort of synthetic table with un-passionate pros and cons for each approach, a little bit like for web-forms and MVC. Sorry for those who will find this question redondant. I know it is.

    Read the article

  • Looking into Enum Support in Entity Framework 5.0 Code First

    - by nikolaosk
    In this post I will show you with a hands-on demo the enum support that is available in Visual Studio 2012, .Net Framework 4.5 and Entity Framework 5.0. You can have a look at this post to learn about the support of multilple diagrams per model that exists in Entity Framework 5.0. We will demonstrate this with a step by step example. I will use Visual Studio 2012 Ultimate. You can also use Visual Studio 2012 Express Edition. Before I move on to the actual demo I must say that in EF 5.0 an enumeration can have the following types. Byte Int16 Int32 Int64 Sbyte Obviously I cannot go into much detail on what EF is and what it does. I will give again a short introduction.The .Net framework provides support for Object Relational Mapping through EF. So EF is a an ORM tool and it is now the main data access technology that microsoft works on. I use it quite extensively in my projects. Through EF we have many things out of the box provided for us. We have the automatic generation of SQL code.It maps relational data to strongly types objects.All the changes made to the objects in the memory are persisted in a transactional way back to the data store. You can find in this post an example on how to use the Entity Framework to retrieve data from an SQL Server Database using the "Database/Schema First" approach. In this approach we make all the changes at the database level and then we update the model with those changes. In this post you can see an example on how to use the "Model First" approach when working with ASP.Net and the Entity Framework. This model was firstly introduced in EF version 4.0 and we could start with a blank model and then create a database from that model.When we made changes to the model , we could recreate the database from the new model. You can search in my blog, because I have posted many posts regarding ASP.Net and EF. I assume you have a working knowledge of C# and know a few things about EF. The Code First approach is the more code-centric than the other two. Basically we write POCO classes and then we persist to a database using something called DBContext. Code First relies on DbContext. We create 2,3 classes (e.g Person,Product) with properties and then these classes interact with the DbContext class. We can create a new database based upon our POCOS classes and have tables generated from those classes.We do not have an .edmx file in this approach.By using this approach we can write much easier unit tests. DbContext is a new context class and is smaller,lightweight wrapper for the main context class which is ObjectContext (Schema First and Model First). Let's begin building our sample application. 1) Launch Visual Studio. Create an ASP.Net Empty Web application. Choose an appropriate name for your application. 2) Add a web form, default.aspx page to the application. 3) Now we need to make sure the Entity Framework is included in our project. Go to Solution Explorer, right-click on the project name.Then select Manage NuGet Packages...In the Manage NuGet Packages dialog, select the Online tab and choose the EntityFramework package.Finally click Install. Have a look at the picture below   4) Create a new folder. Name it CodeFirst . 5) Add a new item in your application, a class file. Name it Footballer.cs. This is going to be a simple POCO class.Place it in the CodeFirst folder. The code follows public class Footballer { public int FootballerID { get; set; } public string FirstName { get; set; } public string LastName { get; set; } public double Weight { get; set; } public double Height { get; set; } public DateTime JoinedTheClub { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } public List<Training> Trainings { get; set; } public FootballPositions Positions { get; set; } }    Now I am going to define my enum values in the same class file, Footballer.cs    public enum FootballPositions    {        Defender,        Midfielder,        Striker    } 6) Now we need to create the Training class. Add a new class to your application and place it in the CodeFirst folder.The code for the class follows.     public class Training     {         public int TrainingID { get; set; }         public int TrainingDuration { get; set; }         public string TrainingLocation { get; set; }     }   7) Then we need to create a context class that inherits from DbContext.Add a new class to the CodeFirst folder.Name it FootballerDBContext.Now that we have the entity classes created, we must let the model know.I will have to use the DbSet<T> property.The code for this class follows       public class FootballerDBContext:DbContext     {         public DbSet<Footballer> Footballers { get; set; }         public DbSet<Training> Trainings { get; set; }     } Do not forget to add  (using System.Data.Entity;) in the beginning of the class file 8) We must take care of the connection string. It is very easy to create one in the web.config.It does not matter that we do not have a database yet.When we run the DbContext and query against it,it will use a connection string in the web.config and will create the database based on the classes. In my case the connection string inside the web.config, looks like this      <connectionStrings>    <add name="CodeFirstDBContext"  connectionString="server=.\SqlExpress;integrated security=true;"  providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"/>                       </connectionStrings>   9) Now it is time to create Linq to Entities queries to retrieve data from the database . Add a new class to your application in the CodeFirst folder.Name the file DALfootballer.cs We will create a simple public method to retrieve the footballers. The code for the class follows public class DALfootballer     {         FootballerDBContext ctx = new FootballerDBContext();         public List<Footballer> GetFootballers()         {             var query = from player in ctx.Footballers where player.FirstName=="Jamie" select player;             return query.ToList();         }     }   10) Place a GridView control on the Default.aspx page and leave the default name.Add an ObjectDataSource control on the Default.aspx page and leave the default name. Set the DatasourceID property of the GridView control to the ID of the ObjectDataSource control.(DataSourceID="ObjectDataSource1" ). Let's configure the ObjectDataSource control. Click on the smart tag item of the ObjectDataSource control and select Configure Data Source. In the Wizzard that pops up select the DALFootballer class and then in the next step choose the GetFootballers() method.Click Finish to complete the steps of the wizzard. Build your application.  11)  Let's create an Insert method in order to insert data into the tables. I will create an Insert() method and for simplicity reasons I will place it in the Default.aspx.cs file. private void Insert()        {            var footballers = new List<Footballer>            {                new Footballer {                                 FirstName = "Steven",LastName="Gerrard", Height=1.85, Weight=85,Age=32, JoinedTheClub=DateTime.Parse("12/12/1999"),Positions=FootballPositions.Midfielder,                Trainings = new List<Training>                             {                                     new Training {TrainingDuration = 3, TrainingLocation="MelWood"},                    new Training {TrainingDuration = 2, TrainingLocation="Anfield"},                    new Training {TrainingDuration = 2, TrainingLocation="MelWood"},                }                            },                            new Footballer {                                  FirstName = "Jamie",LastName="Garragher", Height=1.89, Weight=89,Age=34, JoinedTheClub=DateTime.Parse("12/02/2000"),Positions=FootballPositions.Defender,                Trainings = new List<Training>                                             {                                 new Training {TrainingDuration = 3, TrainingLocation="MelWood"},                new Training {TrainingDuration = 5, TrainingLocation="Anfield"},                new Training {TrainingDuration = 6, TrainingLocation="Anfield"},                }                           }                    };            footballers.ForEach(foot => ctx.Footballers.Add(foot));            ctx.SaveChanges();        }   12) In the Page_Load() event handling routine I called the Insert() method.        protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)        {                   Insert();                }  13) Run your application and you will see that the following result,hopefully. You can see clearly that the data is returned along with the enum value.  14) You must have also a look at the database.Launch SSMS and see the database and its objects (data) created from EF Code First.Have a look at the picture below. Hopefully now you have seen the support that exists in EF 5.0 for enums.Hope it helps !!!

    Read the article

  • helper functions as static functions or procedural functions?

    - by fayer
    i wonder if one should create a helper function in a class as a static function or just have it declared as a procedural function? i tend to think that a static helper function is the right way to go cause then i can see what kind of helper function it is eg. Database::connect(), File::create(). what is best practice?

    Read the article

  • Inheritance Mapping Strategies with Entity Framework Code First CTP5: Part 2 – Table per Type (TPT)

    - by mortezam
    In the previous blog post you saw that there are three different approaches to representing an inheritance hierarchy and I explained Table per Hierarchy (TPH) as the default mapping strategy in EF Code First. We argued that the disadvantages of TPH may be too serious for our design since it results in denormalized schemas that can become a major burden in the long run. In today’s blog post we are going to learn about Table per Type (TPT) as another inheritance mapping strategy and we'll see that TPT doesn’t expose us to this problem. Table per Type (TPT)Table per Type is about representing inheritance relationships as relational foreign key associations. Every class/subclass that declares persistent properties—including abstract classes—has its own table. The table for subclasses contains columns only for each noninherited property (each property declared by the subclass itself) along with a primary key that is also a foreign key of the base class table. This approach is shown in the following figure: For example, if an instance of the CreditCard subclass is made persistent, the values of properties declared by the BillingDetail base class are persisted to a new row of the BillingDetails table. Only the values of properties declared by the subclass (i.e. CreditCard) are persisted to a new row of the CreditCards table. The two rows are linked together by their shared primary key value. Later, the subclass instance may be retrieved from the database by joining the subclass table with the base class table. TPT Advantages The primary advantage of this strategy is that the SQL schema is normalized. In addition, schema evolution is straightforward (modifying the base class or adding a new subclass is just a matter of modify/add one table). Integrity constraint definition are also straightforward (note how CardType in CreditCards table is now a non-nullable column). Another much more important advantage is the ability to handle polymorphic associations (a polymorphic association is an association to a base class, hence to all classes in the hierarchy with dynamic resolution of the concrete class at runtime). A polymorphic association to a particular subclass may be represented as a foreign key referencing the table of that particular subclass. Implement TPT in EF Code First We can create a TPT mapping simply by placing Table attribute on the subclasses to specify the mapped table name (Table attribute is a new data annotation and has been added to System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations namespace in CTP5): public abstract class BillingDetail {     public int BillingDetailId { get; set; }     public string Owner { get; set; }     public string Number { get; set; } } [Table("BankAccounts")] public class BankAccount : BillingDetail {     public string BankName { get; set; }     public string Swift { get; set; } } [Table("CreditCards")] public class CreditCard : BillingDetail {     public int CardType { get; set; }     public string ExpiryMonth { get; set; }     public string ExpiryYear { get; set; } } public class InheritanceMappingContext : DbContext {     public DbSet<BillingDetail> BillingDetails { get; set; } } If you prefer fluent API, then you can create a TPT mapping by using ToTable() method: protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder) {     modelBuilder.Entity<BankAccount>().ToTable("BankAccounts");     modelBuilder.Entity<CreditCard>().ToTable("CreditCards"); } Generated SQL For QueriesLet’s take an example of a simple non-polymorphic query that returns a list of all the BankAccounts: var query = from b in context.BillingDetails.OfType<BankAccount>() select b; Executing this query (by invoking ToList() method) results in the following SQL statements being sent to the database (on the bottom, you can also see the result of executing the generated query in SQL Server Management Studio): Now, let’s take an example of a very simple polymorphic query that requests all the BillingDetails which includes both BankAccount and CreditCard types: projects some properties out of the base class BillingDetail, without querying for anything from any of the subclasses: var query = from b in context.BillingDetails             select new { b.BillingDetailId, b.Number, b.Owner }; -- var query = from b in context.BillingDetails select b; This LINQ query seems even more simple than the previous one but the resulting SQL query is not as simple as you might expect: -- As you can see, EF Code First relies on an INNER JOIN to detect the existence (or absence) of rows in the subclass tables CreditCards and BankAccounts so it can determine the concrete subclass for a particular row of the BillingDetails table. Also the SQL CASE statements that you see in the beginning of the query is just to ensure columns that are irrelevant for a particular row have NULL values in the returning flattened table. (e.g. BankName for a row that represents a CreditCard type) TPT ConsiderationsEven though this mapping strategy is deceptively simple, the experience shows that performance can be unacceptable for complex class hierarchies because queries always require a join across many tables. In addition, this mapping strategy is more difficult to implement by hand— even ad-hoc reporting is more complex. This is an important consideration if you plan to use handwritten SQL in your application (For ad hoc reporting, database views provide a way to offset the complexity of the TPT strategy. A view may be used to transform the table-per-type model into the much simpler table-per-hierarchy model.) SummaryIn this post we learned about Table per Type as the second inheritance mapping in our series. So far, the strategies we’ve discussed require extra consideration with regard to the SQL schema (e.g. in TPT, foreign keys are needed). This situation changes with the Table per Concrete Type (TPC) that we will discuss in the next post. References ADO.NET team blog Java Persistence with Hibernate book a { text-decoration: none; } a:visited { color: Blue; } .title { padding-bottom: 5px; font-family: Segoe UI; font-size: 11pt; font-weight: bold; padding-top: 15px; } .code, .typeName { font-family: consolas; } .typeName { color: #2b91af; } .padTop5 { padding-top: 5px; } .padTop10 { padding-top: 10px; } p.MsoNormal { margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 10.0pt; margin-left: 0in; line-height: 115%; font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: "Calibri" , "sans-serif"; }

    Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >