Search Results

Search found 6536 results on 262 pages for 'forms abstraction'.

Page 1/262 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• Alert for Forms customers running Oracle Forms 10g

  - by Grant Ronald

  Doesn’t time fly!  While you might have been happily running your Forms 10g applications for about 5 years or so now, the end of premier support is creeping up and you need to start planning for a move to Oracle Forms 11g. The premier support end date in December 31st 2011 and this is documented in Note: 1290974.1 available from MOS. So how much of an impact is this going to be?  Maybe not as much as you think.  While Forms 11g is based on WebLogic Server (WLS),10g was based  on OC4J.  That in itself doesn’t impact Forms much.  In most case it will simply be a recompile of your Forms source files and redeploy on WLS 11g. The Forms builder is the same in 11g as in 10g although its currently not available as a separate download from the main middleware bundle.  You can also look at a WLS Basic license option which means you shouldn’t have to shell out on upgrading to a WLS Suite license option. So what’s the proof in this being a relatively straightforward upgrade?  Well, we’ve had a big uptake of Forms 11g already (which has itself been out for over 2 years).  Read about BT Expedite’s upgrade where “The upgrade of Forms from Oracle Forms 10g to Oracle Forms 11g was relatively simple and on the whole, was just a recompilation”.  Or AMEC where “This has been one of the easiest Forms conversions we’ve ever done and it was a simple recompile in all cases” So if you are on 10g (or even earlier versions) I’d strongly consider starting your planning for an upgrade to 11g now. As always, if you have any questions about this you can post on the OTN forums.

  Read the article

• django crispy-forms inline forms

  - by abolotnov

  I'm trying to adopt crispy-forms and bootstrap and use as much of their functionality as possible instead of inventing something over and over again. Is there a way to have inline forms functionality with crispy-forms/bootstrap like django-admin forms have? Here is an example: class NewProjectForm(forms.Form): name = forms.CharField(required=True, label=_(u'???????? ???????'), widget=forms.TextInput(attrs={'class':'input-block-level'})) group = forms.ModelChoiceField(required=False, queryset=Group.objects.all(), label=_(u'?????? ????????'), widget=forms.Select(attrs={'class':'input-block-level'})) description = forms.CharField(required=False, label=_(u'???????? ???????'), widget=forms.Textarea(attrs={'class':'input-block-level'})) class Meta: model = Project fields = ('name','description','group') def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): self.helper = FormHelper() self.helper.form_class = 'horizontal-form' self.helper.form_action = 'submit_new_project' self.helper.layout = Layout( Field('name', css_class='input-block-level'), Field('group', css_class='input-block-level'), Field('description',css_class='input-block-level'), ) self.helper.add_input(Submit('submit',_(u'??????? ??????'))) self.helper.add_input(Submit('cancel',_(u'? ?????????'))) super(NewProjectForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) it will display a decent form: How do I go about adding a form that basically represents this model: class Link(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False, verbose_name=_(u'????????')) url = models.URLField(blank=False, null=False, verbose_name=_(u'??????')) project = models.ForeignKey('Project') So there will be a project and name/url links and way to add many, like same thing is done in django-admin where you are able to add extra 'rows' with data related to your main model. On the sreenshot below you are able to fill out data for 'Question' object and below that you are able to add data for QuestionOption objects -you are able to click the '+' icon to add as many QuestionOptions as you want. I'm not looking for a way to get the forms auto-generated from models (that's nice but not the most important) - is there a way to construct a form that will let you add 'rows' of data like django-admin does?

  Read the article

• Can too much abstraction be bad?

  - by m3th0dman

  As programmers I feel that our goal is to provide good abstractions on the given domain model and business logic. But where should this abstraction stop? How to make the trade-off between abstraction and all it's benefits (flexibility, ease of changing etc.) and ease of understanding the code and all it's benefits. I believe I tend to write code overly abstracted and I don't know how good is it; I often tend to write it like it is some kind of a micro-framework, which consists of two parts: Micro-Modules which are hooked up in the micro-framework: these modules are easy to be understood, developed and maintained as single units. This code basically represents the code that actually does the functional stuff, described in requirements. Connecting code; now here I believe stands the problem. This code tends to be complicated because it is sometimes very abstracted and is hard to be understood at the beginning; this arises due to the fact that it is only pure abstraction, the base in reality and business logic being performed in the code presented 1; from this reason this code is not expected to be changed once tested. Is this a good approach at programming? That it, having changing code very fragmented in many modules and very easy to be understood and non-changing code very complex from the abstraction POV? Should all the code be uniformly complex (that is code 1 more complex and interlinked and code 2 more simple) so that anybody looking through it can understand it in a reasonable amount of time but change is expensive or the solution presented above is good, where "changing code" is very easy to be understood, debugged, changed and "linking code" is kind of difficult. Note: this is not about code readability! Both code at 1 and 2 is readable, but code at 2 comes with more complex abstractions while code 1 comes with simple abstractions.

  Read the article

• Oracle Forms Modernization Seminar January 2011

  - by Grant Ronald

  Are you running Oracle Forms applications in your business?  Do you want to know about the future of Oracle Forms and the options you have?  How can you modernize your Oracle Forms investment? I'll be presenting at a web seminar on the 20th January and will be discussing these points.  Details of the seminar can be found here: Iseminar.pdf Registration is available here. 

  Read the article

• Using dot To Access Object Attribute and Proper abstraction

  - by cobie

  I have been programming in python and java for quite a number of years and one thing i find myself doing is using the setters and getters from java in python but a number of blogs seem to think using the dot notation for access is the pythonic way. What I would like to know is if using dot to access methods does not violate abstraction principle. If for example I implement an attribute as a single object and use dot notation to access, if I wanted to change the code later so that the attribute is represented by a list of objects, that would require quite some heavy lifting which violates abstraction principle.

  Read the article

• Oracle Forms 11g Customer Upgrade Reference

  - by Grant Ronald

  We have just published a reference to an Oracle customer, Callista, talking about their Forms upgrade experiences and future development plans. I'm actually seeing a huge number of Forms customers upgrading to 11g but it can take some time and effort for customers to formally agree to be a reference story, so I'm grateful to Callista for taking the time to become an 11g upgrade reference.  We have a number of other customers who are writing up their upgrade experiences and we hope to have these on OTN in the coming months. You can access this from the Forms home page on OTN.

  Read the article

• Using macro as an abstraction layer

  - by tehnyit

  I am having a discussion with a colleague about using macro as a thin (extremely) layer of abstraction vs using a function wrapper. The example that I used is Macro way. #define StartOSTimer(period) (microTimerStart(period)) Function wrapper method void StartOSTimer(period) { microTimerStart(period); } Personally, I liked the second method as it allows for future modification, the #include dependencies are also abstracted as well.

  Read the article

• Code Reuse and Abstraction in FP vs OOP

  - by Electric Coffee

  I've been told that code reuse and abstraction in OOP is far more difficult to do than it is in FP, and that all the claims that have been made about Object Orientedness (for lack of a better term) being great at reusing code have been flat out lies So I was wondering if anyone here could tell me why that is, and perhaps show me some code to back up these claims, I'm not saying I don't believe you Functional programmers, it's just that I've been "indoctrinated" to think Object Orientedly, and thus can't (yet) think Functionally enough to see it myself To quote Jimmy Hoffa (from an answer to one of my previous questions): The cake is a lie, code reuse in OO is far more difficult than in FP. For all that OO has claimed code reuse over the years, I have seen it follow through a minimum of times. (feel free to just say I must be doing it wrong, I'm comfortable with how well I write OO code having had to design and maintain OO systems for years, I know the quality of my own results) That quote is the basis of my question, I want to see if there's anything to the claim or not

  Read the article

• Is there a way communicate or measure levels of abstraction?

  - by hydroparadise

  I'll be the first to say that this question is a bit... out there. But here are a couple questions I bear in mind : Is abstraction continuous or discrete? Is there a single unit of abstraction? But I'm not sure those questions are truly answerable or even really makes sence. My naive answer would be something along the lines of abitrarily discrete but not necescarily having a single unit measure. Here's what I mean... Take a Black Labrador; an abstraction that could be made is that a Black Lab is a type of animal. [Animal]<--[Black Lab] A Black Lab is also a type of Dog. [Dog]<--[Black Lab] One way to establish a degree of abstraction is by comparing the two the abstractions. We could say that [Animal] is more abstract than [Dog] in respect to a Black Lab. It just so happens [Animal] can also be used as an abstraction of [Dog] So, we might end up with something like [Animal]<--[Dog]<--[Black Lab] With the model above, one might be inclined to say that there's two hops of abstraction to get from [Black Lab] to [Animal]. But you can't exactly tell somebody they need one level abstraction and reasonalby expect they will come up with [Dog] given they aren't explicity given the options above. If I needed to tell someobody in a single email that they needed an abstract class with out knowing what that abstract class is, is there a way to communaticate a degree of abstraction such that they might end up on Dog instead of Animal? As a side note, what area of study might this type of analysis fall under?

  Read the article

• Migrating Forms to Java or ADF, the truth and no FUD

  - by Grant Ronald

  The question about migrating Forms to Java (or ADF or APEX) comes up time and time again.  I wanted to pull some core information together in a single blog post to address this question. The first question I always ask is "WHY" - Forms may still be a viable option for you so "if it ain't broke don't fix it".  Bottom line is whatever anyone tells you, its going to be a considerable effort and cost to migrate from Forms to something else so the business is going to want to know WHY you spend all those hard earned dollars switching from something that might have been serving you quite adequately. Second point, if you are going to switch, I would encourage you NOT to look at building a Forms clone.  So many times I see people trying to build an ADF application and EXACTLY mimic the Forms model - ADF is NOT a Forms clone.  You should be building to the sweet spot of your target technology, not your 20 year old client/server technology.  This is also the chance for the business to embrace change, so maybe look at new processes, channels and technology options that weren't available when you first developed your Forms applications. To help you understand what is involved, I've put together a number of resources. Thinking about migration of Forms to Java, ADF or APEX, read this to prepare yourself Oracle Forms to ADF: When, Why and How - this gives you an overview of our vision, directly from Oracle Product Management Redeveloping a Forms Application with Oracle JDeveloper and Oracle ADF.  This is a conference session from myself and Lynn Munsinger on how ADF can be used in a Forms migration/rewrite As someone who manages both Forms and ADF Product Management teams, I've a foot in either camp and am happy to see you use either tool.  However, I want you to be able to make an informed decision.  My hope is that there information sources will help you do that.

  Read the article

• Integrating Oracle Forms Applications 11g Into SOA (4-6/Mai/10)

  - by Claudia Costa

  Workshop Description This is a Free workshop of 3 days is targeted at Oracle Forms professionals interested in integrating Oracle Forms into a Service Oriented Architecture. The workshop highlights how Forms can be part of a Service Oriented Architecture, how the Oracle Forms functionalities make it possible to integrate existing (or new) Forms applications with new or existing development utilizing the Service Oriented Architecture concepts. The goal is to understand the incremental approach that Forms provides to developers who need to extend their business platform to JEE, allowing Oracle Forms customers to retain their investment in Oracle Forms while leveraging the opportunities offered by complementing technologies. During the event the attendees will implement the Oracle Forms functionalities that make it possible to integrate with SOA. Register Now! Prerequisites ·         Knowledge of the Oracle Forms development environment (mandatory) ·         Basic knowledge of the Oracle database ·         Basic knowledge of the Java Programming Language ·         Basic knowledge of Oracle Jdeveloper or another Java IDE   System Requirements   This workshop requires attendees to provide their own laptops for this class. Attendee laptops must meet the following minimum hardware/software requirements:   ·         Laptop/PC with minimum 4 GB RAM ·         Oracle Database ·         Oracle Forms 11g R1 PS1 (WebLogic Server 10.1.3.2 + Portal, Forms, Reports and Discoverer ) ·         Oracle JDeveloper 11g R1 PS1 http://download.oracle.com/otn/java/jdeveloper/1112/jdevstudio11112install.exe ·         TCP-IP Loopback Adapter Installation (before the SOASuite installation) ·         Oracle SOASuite 11g R1 PS1 (without BAM component) When asked for an admin password, please use 'welcome1 http://download.oracle.com/otn/nt/middleware/11g/ofm_rcu_win_11.1.1.2.0_disk1_1of1.zip http://download.oracle.com/otn/nt/middleware/11g/ofm_soa_generic_11.1.1.2.0_disk1_1of1.zip ·         Oracle BI Publisher 10.1.3.4.1 http://download.oracle.com/otn/nt/ias/101341/bipublisher_windows_x86_101341.zip ·         Oracle BI Publisher Desktop 10.1.3.4. http://download.oracle.com/otn/nt/ias/101341/bipublisher_desktop_windows_x86_101341.zip   ·         At least 1 Oracle Forms solution already upgraded to the Oracle FMW 11g platform.   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------   Horário e Local:   4-6 de Maio / 9:30-18:00h Oracle, Porto Salvo Register Here Para mais informação por favor contacte: [email protected]

  Read the article

• Beware when using .NET's named pipes in a windows forms application

  - by FransBouma

  Yesterday a user of our .net ORM Profiler tool reported that he couldn't get the snapshot recording from code feature working in a windows forms application. Snapshot recording in code means you start recording profile data from within the profiled application, and after you're done you save the snapshot as a file which you can open in the profiler UI. When using a console application it worked, but when a windows forms application was used, the snapshot was always empty: nothing was recorded. Obviously, I wondered why that was, and debugged a little. Here's an example piece of code to record the snapshot. This piece of code works OK in a console application, but results in an empty snapshot in a windows forms application: var snapshot = new Snapshot(); snapshot.Record(); using(var ctx = new ORMProfilerTestDataContext()) { var customers = ctx.Customers.Where(c => c.Country == "USA").ToList(); } InterceptorCore.Flush(); snapshot.Stop(); string error=string.Empty; if(!snapshot.IsEmpty) { snapshot.SaveToFile(@"c:\temp\generatortest\test2\blaat.opsnapshot", out error); } if(!string.IsNullOrEmpty(error)) { Console.WriteLine("Save error: {0}", error); } (the Console.WriteLine doesn't do anything in a windows forms application, but you get the idea). ORM Profiler uses named pipes: the interceptor (referenced and initialized in your application, the application to profile) sends data over the named pipe to a listener, which when receiving a piece of data begins reading it, asynchronically, and when properly read, it will signal observers that new data has arrived so they can store it in a repository. In this case, the snapshot will be the observer and will store the data in its own repository. The reason the above code doesn't work in windows forms is because windows forms is a wrapper around Win32 and its WM_* message based system. Named pipes in .NET are wrappers around Windows named pipes which also work with WM_* messages. Even though we use BeginRead() on the named pipe (which spawns a thread to read the data from the named pipe), nothing is received by the named pipe in the windows forms application, because it doesn't handle the WM_* messages in its message queue till after the method is over, as the message pump of a windows forms application is handled by the only thread of the windows forms application, so it will handle WM_* messages when the application idles. The fix is easy though: add Application.DoEvents(); right before snapshot.Stop(). Application.DoEvents() forces the windows forms application to process all WM_* messages in its message queue at that moment: all messages for the named pipe are then handled, the .NET code of the named pipe wrapper will react on that and the whole process will complete as if nothing happened. It's not that simple to just say 'why didn't you use a worker thread to create the snapshot here?', because a thread doesn't get its own message pump: the messages would still be posted to the window's message pump. A hidden form would create its own message pump, so the additional thread should also create a window to get the WM_* messages of the named pipe posted to a different message pump than the one of the main window. This WM_* messages pain is not something you want to be confronted with when using .NET and its libraries. Unfortunately, the way they're implemented, a lot of APIs are leaky abstractions, they bleed the characteristics of the OS objects they hide away through to the .NET code. Be aware of that fact when using them :)

  Read the article

• .NET Forms Abstraction for WPF, Silverlight, Winforms, WebForms, etc...

  - by tyndall

  Anyone know of a project(s) that seek to abstract form definitions on level higher than WPF, Silverlight, Winforms, WebForms, etc... I'm working on a project where we are fixing up 16 somewhat simple WebForms. But we may convert (and probably will convert to WPF or Silverlight 3 to 4 months from now. I'd rather define these forms once and be done with it. I'm willing to write a small DSL to help define forms, subforms, validation, links, and popups. I'm only looking to solve this for 80% or 90% of the forms. Four are very complicated and I'm willing to hand code these. I guess I'm looking for something like what XUL had hoped to be.

  Read the article

• Abstraction, Politics, and Software Architecture

  Abstraction can be defined as a general concept and/or idea that lack any concrete details. Throughout history this type of thinking has led to an array of new ideas and innovations as well as increased confusion and conspiracy. If one was to look back at our history they will see that abstraction has been used in various forms throughout our past. When I was growing up I do not know how many times I heard politicians say “Leave no child left behind” or “No child left behind” as a major part of their campaign rhetoric in regards to a stance on education. As you can see their slogan is a perfect example of abstraction because it only offers a very general concept about improving our education system but they do not mention how they would like to do it. If they did then they would be adding concrete details to their abstraction thus turning it in to an actual working plan as to how we as a society can help children succeed in school and in life, but then they would not be using abstraction. By now I sure you are thinking what does abstraction have to do with software architecture. You are valid in thinking this way, but abstraction is a wonderful tool used in information technology especially in the world of software architecture. Abstraction is one method of extracting the concepts of an idea so that it can be understood and discussed by others of varying technical abilities and backgrounds. One ways in which I tend to extract my architectural design thoughts is through the use of basic diagrams to convey an idea for a system or a new feature for an existing application. This allows me to generically model an architectural design through the use of views and Unified Markup Language (UML). UML is a standard method for creating a 4+1 Architectural View Models. The 4+1 Architectural View Model consists of 4 views typically created with UML as well as a general description of the concept that is being expressed by a model. The 4+1 Architectural View Model: Logical View: Models a system’s end-user functionality. Development View: Models a system as a collection of components and connectors to illustrate how it is intended to be developed.  Process View: Models the interaction between system components and connectors as to indicate the activities of a system. Physical View: Models the placement of the collection of components and connectors of a system within a physical environment. Recently I had to use the concept of abstraction to express an idea for implementing a new security framework on an existing website. My concept would add session based management in order to properly secure and allow page access based on valid user credentials and last user activity.  I created a basic Process View by using UML diagrams to communicate the basic process flow of my changes in the application so that all of the projects stakeholders would be able to understand my idea. Additionally I created a Logical View on a whiteboard while conveying the process workflow with a few stakeholders to show how end-user will be affected by the new framework and gaining additional input about the design. After my Logical and Process Views were accepted I then started on creating a more detailed Development View in order to map how the system will be built based on the concept of components and connections based on the previously defined interactions. I really did not need to create a Physical view for this idea because we were updating an existing system that was already deployed based on an existing Physical View. What do you think about the use of abstraction in the development of software architecture? Please let me know.

  Read the article

• Abstraction is for lame programmers ? [closed]

  - by Zaban Khuli

  Hi, there's this senior developer in my company who's (in his own opinion) a pretty good C programmer. I happen to be from functional background (ML, to be specific) and so for me composition and abstraction are the two basic elements of programming. But this MrSmartyPants has got some kind of superiority complex and he'd always argue with me that abstraction is for lame programmers and _real_ programmers do not need it. Is it a problem with this guy or all C programmers have this opinion that abstraction is for lame programmers?

  Read the article

• An alternative to multiple inheritance when creating an abstraction layer?

  - by sebf

  In my project I am creating an abstraction layer for some APIs. The purpose of the layer is to make multi-platform easier, and also to simplify the APIs to the feature set that I need while also providing some functionality, the implementation of which will be unique to each platform. At the moment, I have implemented it by defining and abstract class, which has methods which creates objects that implement interfaces. The abstract class and these interfaces define the capabilities of my abstraction layer. The implementation of these in my layer should of course be arbitrary from the POV view of my application, but I have done it, for my first API, by creating chains of subclasses which add more specific functionality as the features of the APIs they expose become less generic. An example would probably demonstrate this better: //The interface as seen by the application interface IGenericResource { byte[] GetSomeData(); } interface ISpecificResourceOne : IGenericResource { int SomePropertyOfResourceOne {get;} } interface ISpecificResourceTwo : IGenericResource { string SomePropertyOfResourceTwo {get;} } public abstract class MyLayer { ISpecificResourceOne CreateResourceOne(); ISpecificResourceTwo CreateResourceTwo(); void UseResourceOne(ISpecificResourceOne one); void UseResourceTwo(ISpecificResourceTwo two); } //The layer as created in my library public class LowLevelResource : IGenericResource { byte[] GetSomeData() {} } public class ResourceOne : LowLevelResource, ISpecificResourceOne { int SomePropertyOfResourceOne {get{}} } public class ResourceTwo : ResourceOne, ISpecificResourceTwo { string SomePropertyOfResourceTwo {get {}} } public partial class Implementation : MyLayer { override UseResourceOne(ISpecificResourceOne one) { DoStuff((ResourceOne)one); } } As can be seen, I am essentially trying to have two inheritance chains on the same object, but of course I can't do this so I simulate the second version with interfaces. The thing is though, I don't like using interfaces for this; it seems wrong, in my mind an interface defines a contract, any class that implements that interface should be able to be used where that interface is used but here that is clearly not the case because the interfaces are being used to allow an object from the layer to masquerade as something else, without the application needing to have access to its definition. What technique would allow me to define a comprehensive, intuitive collection of objects for an abstraction layer, while their implementation remains independent? (Language is C#)

  Read the article

• Designer issue in VS: Events cannot be set on the object passed to the event binding service ...

  - by serhio

  I have a little problem: the Winform control (that contains between others WPF) suddenly stopped to be displayed in Designer. Message: Events cannot be set on the object passed to the event binding service because a site associated with the object could not be located. Call Stack: at System.ComponentModel.Design.EventBindingService.EventPropertyDescriptor.SetValue(Object component, Object value) at System.ComponentModel.Design.Serialization.CodeDomSerializerBase.DeserializeAttachEventStatement(IDesignerSerializationManager manager, CodeAttachEventStatement statement) at System.ComponentModel.Design.Serialization.CodeDomSerializerBase.DeserializeStatement(IDesignerSerializationManager manager, CodeStatement statement) Where could be the problem? InitializeComponent code Private Sub InitializeComponent() Dim resources As System.ComponentModel.ComponentResourceManager = New System.ComponentModel.ComponentResourceManager(GetType(PlanDeLigne)) Dim Appearance1 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Dim Appearance2 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Dim Appearance3 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Dim Appearance4 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Dim Appearance5 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Dim Appearance6 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Dim Appearance7 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Dim Appearance8 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Dim Appearance9 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Dim Appearance10 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Dim Appearance11 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Dim Appearance12 As Infragistics.Win.Appearance = New Infragistics.Win.Appearance() Me.mnbMenu = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStrip() Me.mncMode = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripComboBox() Me.mnbSeparator1 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mnbAdd = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripButton() Me.mnbDelete = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripButton() Me.mnbSeparator2 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mnbDropDownAction = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripDropDownButton() Me.mnbDropDownActionSens = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mnbDropDownActionSeparator1 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mnbDropDownActionDistances = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mnbDropDownActionSeparator2 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mnbDropDownActionArretsPhysiques = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mnbSeparator3 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mnbSelectionZoom = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripButton() Me.mnbCancelZoom = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripButton() Me.mnbSeparator4 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mnbParametrage = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripButton() Me.mncSPlacerArret = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncSSeparator1 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mncSImage = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncSDefinirLastArret = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncSSeparator2 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mncSSupprimerArrets = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncSInsererArret = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncSSeparator3 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mncSInformations = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncSSupprimerSegment = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncSSeparator4 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mncSBatirTroncon = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncTInformations = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncTDistances = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncTSeparator1 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mncTTempsDeParcours = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncTSeparator2 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mncTCreerSensInverse = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncTSeparator3 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mncTSupprimerTroncon = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncTBatirItineraire = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncIInformations = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.mncISeparator1 = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripSeparator() Me.mncISupprimerItineraire = New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripMenuItem() Me.SplitContainer = New System.Windows.Forms.SplitContainer() Me.ElementHost1 = New System.Windows.Forms.Integration.ElementHost() Me._StopsCanvas = New Keolis.ctlWpfPlanDeLigne.StopsCanvas() Me.lblTitreCreation = New Keolis.ctlComponents.Label() Me.Panel1 = New System.Windows.Forms.Panel() Me.btnOk = New Keolis.ctlComponents.Button() Me.btnAnnuler = New Keolis.ctlComponents.Button() Me.grdCreation = New Keolis.ctlWinGrid.WinGrid() Me.mnbMenu.SuspendLayout() CType(Me.SplitContainer, System.ComponentModel.ISupportInitialize).BeginInit() Me.SplitContainer.Panel1.SuspendLayout() Me.SplitContainer.Panel2.SuspendLayout() Me.SplitContainer.SuspendLayout() Me.Panel1.SuspendLayout() CType(Me.grdCreation, System.ComponentModel.ISupportInitialize).BeginInit() Me.SuspendLayout() ' 'mnbMenu ' Me.mnbMenu.GripStyle = System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripGripStyle.Hidden Me.mnbMenu.Items.AddRange(New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem() {Me.mncMode, Me.mnbSeparator1, Me.mnbAdd, Me.mnbDelete, Me.mnbSeparator2, Me.mnbDropDownAction, Me.mnbSeparator3, Me.mnbSelectionZoom, Me.mnbCancelZoom, Me.mnbSeparator4, Me.mnbParametrage}) Me.mnbMenu.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(0, 0) Me.mnbMenu.Name = "mnbMenu" Me.mnbMenu.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(605, 25) Me.mnbMenu.TabIndex = 2 ' 'mncMode ' Me.mncMode.DropDownStyle = System.Windows.Forms.ComboBoxStyle.DropDownList Me.mncMode.Name = "mncMode" Me.mncMode.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(121, 25) Me.mncMode.ToolTipText = "Mode du plan de ligne" ' 'mnbSeparator1 ' Me.mnbSeparator1.AutoSize = False Me.mnbSeparator1.Name = "mnbSeparator1" Me.mnbSeparator1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(20, 25) ' 'mnbAdd ' Me.mnbAdd.DisplayStyle = System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItemDisplayStyle.Image Me.mnbAdd.Image = CType(resources.GetObject("mnbAdd.Image"), System.Drawing.Image) Me.mnbAdd.ImageTransparentColor = System.Drawing.Color.Magenta Me.mnbAdd.Name = "mnbAdd" Me.mnbAdd.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(23, 22) Me.mnbAdd.Text = "Création Tronçon / Itinéraire" ' 'mnbDelete ' Me.mnbDelete.DisplayStyle = System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItemDisplayStyle.Image Me.mnbDelete.Image = CType(resources.GetObject("mnbDelete.Image"), System.Drawing.Image) Me.mnbDelete.ImageTransparentColor = System.Drawing.Color.Magenta Me.mnbDelete.Name = "mnbDelete" Me.mnbDelete.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(23, 22) Me.mnbDelete.Text = "Supprimer les éléments sélectionnés" ' 'mnbSeparator2 ' Me.mnbSeparator2.AutoSize = False Me.mnbSeparator2.Name = "mnbSeparator2" Me.mnbSeparator2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(20, 25) ' 'mnbDropDownAction ' Me.mnbDropDownAction.DisplayStyle = System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItemDisplayStyle.Image Me.mnbDropDownAction.DropDownItems.AddRange(New System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem() {Me.mnbDropDownActionSens, Me.mnbDropDownActionSeparator1, Me.mnbDropDownActionDistances, Me.mnbDropDownActionSeparator2, Me.mnbDropDownActionArretsPhysiques}) Me.mnbDropDownAction.Image = CType(resources.GetObject("mnbDropDownAction.Image"), System.Drawing.Image) Me.mnbDropDownAction.ImageTransparentColor = System.Drawing.Color.Magenta Me.mnbDropDownAction.Name = "mnbDropDownAction" Me.mnbDropDownAction.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(29, 22) Me.mnbDropDownAction.Text = "Action sur le plan de ligne" ' 'mnbDropDownActionSens ' Me.mnbDropDownActionSens.Checked = True Me.mnbDropDownActionSens.CheckOnClick = True Me.mnbDropDownActionSens.CheckState = System.Windows.Forms.CheckState.Checked Me.mnbDropDownActionSens.Name = "mnbDropDownActionSens" Me.mnbDropDownActionSens.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(222, 22) Me.mnbDropDownActionSens.Text = "Afficher le sens" ' 'mnbDropDownActionSeparator1 ' Me.mnbDropDownActionSeparator1.Name = "mnbDropDownActionSeparator1" Me.mnbDropDownActionSeparator1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(219, 6) ' 'mnbDropDownActionDistances ' Me.mnbDropDownActionDistances.Checked = True Me.mnbDropDownActionDistances.CheckOnClick = True Me.mnbDropDownActionDistances.CheckState = System.Windows.Forms.CheckState.Checked Me.mnbDropDownActionDistances.Name = "mnbDropDownActionDistances" Me.mnbDropDownActionDistances.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(222, 22) Me.mnbDropDownActionDistances.Text = "Afficher les distances" ' 'mnbDropDownActionSeparator2 ' Me.mnbDropDownActionSeparator2.Name = "mnbDropDownActionSeparator2" Me.mnbDropDownActionSeparator2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(219, 6) ' 'mnbDropDownActionArretsPhysiques ' Me.mnbDropDownActionArretsPhysiques.Checked = True Me.mnbDropDownActionArretsPhysiques.CheckOnClick = True Me.mnbDropDownActionArretsPhysiques.CheckState = System.Windows.Forms.CheckState.Checked Me.mnbDropDownActionArretsPhysiques.Name = "mnbDropDownActionArretsPhysiques" Me.mnbDropDownActionArretsPhysiques.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(222, 22) Me.mnbDropDownActionArretsPhysiques.Text = "Afficher les arrêts physiques" ' 'mnbSeparator3 ' Me.mnbSeparator3.AutoSize = False Me.mnbSeparator3.Name = "mnbSeparator3" Me.mnbSeparator3.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(20, 25) ' 'mnbSelectionZoom ' Me.mnbSelectionZoom.CheckOnClick = True Me.mnbSelectionZoom.DisplayStyle = System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItemDisplayStyle.Image Me.mnbSelectionZoom.Image = CType(resources.GetObject("mnbSelectionZoom.Image"), System.Drawing.Image) Me.mnbSelectionZoom.ImageTransparentColor = System.Drawing.Color.Magenta Me.mnbSelectionZoom.Name = "mnbSelectionZoom" Me.mnbSelectionZoom.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(23, 22) Me.mnbSelectionZoom.Text = "Zoom par sélection" ' 'mnbCancelZoom ' Me.mnbCancelZoom.DisplayStyle = System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItemDisplayStyle.Image Me.mnbCancelZoom.Image = CType(resources.GetObject("mnbCancelZoom.Image"), System.Drawing.Image) Me.mnbCancelZoom.ImageTransparentColor = System.Drawing.Color.Magenta Me.mnbCancelZoom.Name = "mnbCancelZoom" Me.mnbCancelZoom.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(23, 22) Me.mnbCancelZoom.Text = "Annuler le zoom" ' 'mnbSeparator4 ' Me.mnbSeparator4.AutoSize = False Me.mnbSeparator4.Name = "mnbSeparator4" Me.mnbSeparator4.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(20, 25) ' 'mnbParametrage ' Me.mnbParametrage.DisplayStyle = System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItemDisplayStyle.Image Me.mnbParametrage.Image = CType(resources.GetObject("mnbParametrage.Image"), System.Drawing.Image) Me.mnbParametrage.ImageTransparentColor = System.Drawing.Color.Magenta Me.mnbParametrage.Name = "mnbParametrage" Me.mnbParametrage.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(23, 22) Me.mnbParametrage.Text = "Paramétrage" ' 'mncSPlacerArret ' Me.mncSPlacerArret.Name = "mncSPlacerArret" Me.mncSPlacerArret.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(216, 22) Me.mncSPlacerArret.Text = "Placer un arrêt" ' 'mncSSeparator1 ' Me.mncSSeparator1.Name = "mncSSeparator1" Me.mncSSeparator1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(213, 6) ' 'mncSImage ' Me.mncSImage.Name = "mncSImage" Me.mncSImage.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(216, 22) Me.mncSImage.Text = "Image..." ' 'mncSDefinirLastArret ' Me.mncSDefinirLastArret.Name = "mncSDefinirLastArret" Me.mncSDefinirLastArret.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(216, 22) Me.mncSDefinirLastArret.Text = "Définir comme dernier arrêt" ' 'mncSSeparator2 ' Me.mncSSeparator2.Name = "mncSSeparator2" Me.mncSSeparator2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(213, 6) ' 'mncSSupprimerArrets ' Me.mncSSupprimerArrets.Name = "mncSSupprimerArrets" Me.mncSSupprimerArrets.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(216, 22) Me.mncSSupprimerArrets.Text = "Supprimer le ou les arrêts" ' 'mncSInsererArret ' Me.mncSInsererArret.Name = "mncSInsererArret" Me.mncSInsererArret.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(216, 22) Me.mncSInsererArret.Text = "Insérer un arrêt" ' 'mncSSeparator3 ' Me.mncSSeparator3.Name = "mncSSeparator3" Me.mncSSeparator3.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(213, 6) ' 'mncSInformations ' Me.mncSInformations.Name = "mncSInformations" Me.mncSInformations.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(216, 22) Me.mncSInformations.Text = "Modifier les informations" ' 'mncSSupprimerSegment ' Me.mncSSupprimerSegment.Name = "mncSSupprimerSegment" Me.mncSSupprimerSegment.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(216, 22) Me.mncSSupprimerSegment.Text = "Supprimer le segment" ' 'mncSSeparator4 ' Me.mncSSeparator4.Name = "mncSSeparator4" Me.mncSSeparator4.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(213, 6) ' 'mncSBatirTroncon ' Me.mncSBatirTroncon.Name = "mncSBatirTroncon" Me.mncSBatirTroncon.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(216, 22) Me.mncSBatirTroncon.Text = "Bâtir un tronçon" ' 'mncTInformations ' Me.mncTInformations.Name = "mncTInformations" Me.mncTInformations.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(201, 22) Me.mncTInformations.Text = "Modifier les informations" ' 'mncTDistances ' Me.mncTDistances.Name = "mncTDistances" Me.mncTDistances.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(201, 22) Me.mncTDistances.Text = "Modifier les distances" ' 'mncTSeparator1 ' Me.mncTSeparator1.Name = "mncTSeparator1" Me.mncTSeparator1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(198, 6) ' 'mncTTempsDeParcours ' Me.mncTTempsDeParcours.Name = "mncTTempsDeParcours" Me.mncTTempsDeParcours.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(201, 22) Me.mncTTempsDeParcours.Text = "Temps de parcours" ' 'mncTSeparator2 ' Me.mncTSeparator2.Name = "mncTSeparator2" Me.mncTSeparator2.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(198, 6) ' 'mncTCreerSensInverse ' Me.mncTCreerSensInverse.Name = "mncTCreerSensInverse" Me.mncTCreerSensInverse.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(201, 22) Me.mncTCreerSensInverse.Text = "Créer le sens inverse" ' 'mncTSeparator3 ' Me.mncTSeparator3.Name = "mncTSeparator3" Me.mncTSeparator3.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(198, 6) ' 'mncTSupprimerTroncon ' Me.mncTSupprimerTroncon.Name = "mncTSupprimerTroncon" Me.mncTSupprimerTroncon.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(201, 22) Me.mncTSupprimerTroncon.Text = "Supprimer le tronçon" ' 'mncTBatirItineraire ' Me.mncTBatirItineraire.Name = "mncTBatirItineraire" Me.mncTBatirItineraire.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(201, 22) Me.mncTBatirItineraire.Text = "Bâtir un itinéraire" ' 'mncIInformations ' Me.mncIInformations.Name = "mncIInformations" Me.mncIInformations.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(201, 22) Me.mncIInformations.Text = "Modifier les informations" ' 'mncISeparator1 ' Me.mncISeparator1.Name = "mncISeparator1" Me.mncISeparator1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(198, 6) ' 'mncISupprimerItineraire ' Me.mncISupprimerItineraire.Name = "mncISupprimerItineraire" Me.mncISupprimerItineraire.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(201, 22) Me.mncISupprimerItineraire.Text = "Supprimer l'itinéraires" ' 'SplitContainer ' Me.SplitContainer.BorderStyle = System.Windows.Forms.BorderStyle.Fixed3D Me.SplitContainer.Dock = System.Windows.Forms.DockStyle.Fill Me.SplitContainer.FixedPanel = System.Windows.Forms.FixedPanel.Panel2 Me.SplitContainer.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(0, 25) Me.SplitContainer.Name = "SplitContainer" ' 'SplitContainer.Panel1 ' Me.SplitContainer.Panel1.AutoScroll = True Me.SplitContainer.Panel1.Controls.Add(Me.ElementHost1) ' 'SplitContainer.Panel2 ' Me.SplitContainer.Panel2.Controls.Add(Me.lblTitreCreation) Me.SplitContainer.Panel2.Controls.Add(Me.Panel1) Me.SplitContainer.Panel2.Controls.Add(Me.grdCreation) Me.SplitContainer.Panel2MinSize = 0 Me.SplitContainer.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(605, 418) Me.SplitContainer.SplitterDistance = 428 Me.SplitContainer.SplitterWidth = 2 Me.SplitContainer.TabIndex = 1 ' 'ElementHost1 ' Me.ElementHost1.Dock = System.Windows.Forms.DockStyle.Fill Me.ElementHost1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(0, 0) Me.ElementHost1.Name = "ElementHost1" Me.ElementHost1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(424, 414) Me.ElementHost1.TabIndex = 0 Me.ElementHost1.Text = "ElementHost1" Me.ElementHost1.Child = Me._StopsCanvas ' 'lblTitreCreation ' Me.lblTitreCreation.Anchor = CType(((System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles.Top Or System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles.Left) _ Or System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles.Right), System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles) Me.lblTitreCreation.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(3, 4) Me.lblTitreCreation.Name = "lblTitreCreation" Me.lblTitreCreation.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(167, 16) Me.lblTitreCreation.TabIndex = 4 ' 'Panel1 ' Me.Panel1.AutoSize = True Me.Panel1.AutoSizeMode = System.Windows.Forms.AutoSizeMode.GrowAndShrink Me.Panel1.Controls.Add(Me.btnOk) Me.Panel1.Controls.Add(Me.btnAnnuler) Me.Panel1.Dock = System.Windows.Forms.DockStyle.Bottom Me.Panel1.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(0, 385) Me.Panel1.Name = "Panel1" Me.Panel1.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(171, 29) Me.Panel1.TabIndex = 3 ' 'btnOk ' Me.btnOk.Anchor = CType((System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles.Top Or System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles.Right), System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles) Me.btnOk.BackColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.Control Me.btnOk.FlatAppearance.MouseDownBackColor = System.Drawing.Color.LightSlateGray Me.btnOk.FlatAppearance.MouseOverBackColor = System.Drawing.Color.LightSteelBlue Me.btnOk.FlatStyle = System.Windows.Forms.FlatStyle.Flat Me.btnOk.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Microsoft Sans Serif", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Regular, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(0, Byte)) Me.btnOk.ForeColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.ControlText Me.btnOk.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(12, 3) Me.btnOk.Name = "btnOk" Me.btnOk.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(75, 23) Me.btnOk.TabIndex = 6 Me.btnOk.Text = "OK" Me.btnOk.UseVisualStyleBackColor = True ' 'btnAnnuler ' Me.btnAnnuler.Anchor = CType((System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles.Top Or System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles.Right), System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles) Me.btnAnnuler.BackColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.Control Me.btnAnnuler.DialogResult = System.Windows.Forms.DialogResult.Cancel Me.btnAnnuler.FlatAppearance.MouseDownBackColor = System.Drawing.Color.LightSlateGray Me.btnAnnuler.FlatAppearance.MouseOverBackColor = System.Drawing.Color.LightSteelBlue Me.btnAnnuler.FlatStyle = System.Windows.Forms.FlatStyle.Flat Me.btnAnnuler.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Microsoft Sans Serif", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Regular, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(0, Byte)) Me.btnAnnuler.ForeColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.ControlText Me.btnAnnuler.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(93, 3) Me.btnAnnuler.Name = "btnAnnuler" Me.btnAnnuler.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(75, 23) Me.btnAnnuler.TabIndex = 7 Me.btnAnnuler.Text = "Annuler" Me.btnAnnuler.UseVisualStyleBackColor = True ' 'grdCreation ' Me.grdCreation.Anchor = CType((((System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles.Top Or System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles.Bottom) _ Or System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles.Left) _ Or System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles.Right), System.Windows.Forms.AnchorStyles) Me.grdCreation.AutoResizeColumns = False Me.grdCreation.ColumnsFiltreActif = False Appearance1.BackColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.Window Appearance1.BorderColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.InactiveCaption Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Appearance = Appearance1 Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.BorderStyle = Infragistics.Win.UIElementBorderStyle.Solid Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.CaptionVisible = Infragistics.Win.DefaultableBoolean.[False] Appearance2.BackColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.ActiveBorder Appearance2.BackColor2 = System.Drawing.SystemColors.ControlDark Appearance2.BackGradientStyle = Infragistics.Win.GradientStyle.Vertical Appearance2.BorderColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.Window Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.GroupByBox.Appearance = Appearance2 Appearance3.ForeColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.GrayText Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.GroupByBox.BandLabelAppearance = Appearance3 Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.GroupByBox.BorderStyle = Infragistics.Win.UIElementBorderStyle.Solid Appearance4.BackColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.ControlLightLight Appearance4.BackColor2 = System.Drawing.SystemColors.Control Appearance4.BackGradientStyle = Infragistics.Win.GradientStyle.Horizontal Appearance4.ForeColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.GrayText Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.GroupByBox.PromptAppearance = Appearance4 Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.MaxColScrollRegions = 1 Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.MaxRowScrollRegions = 1 Appearance5.BackColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.Window Appearance5.ForeColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.ControlText Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.ActiveCellAppearance = Appearance5 Appearance6.BackColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.Highlight Appearance6.ForeColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.HighlightText Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.ActiveRowAppearance = Appearance6 Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.AllowRowFiltering = Infragistics.Win.DefaultableBoolean.[False] Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.BorderStyleCell = Infragistics.Win.UIElementBorderStyle.Dotted Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.BorderStyleRow = Infragistics.Win.UIElementBorderStyle.Dotted Appearance7.BackColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.Window Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.CardAreaAppearance = Appearance7 Appearance8.BorderColor = System.Drawing.Color.Silver Appearance8.TextTrimming = Infragistics.Win.TextTrimming.EllipsisCharacter Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.CellAppearance = Appearance8 Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.CellPadding = 0 Appearance9.BackColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.Control Appearance9.BackColor2 = System.Drawing.SystemColors.ControlDark Appearance9.BackGradientAlignment = Infragistics.Win.GradientAlignment.Element Appearance9.BackGradientStyle = Infragistics.Win.GradientStyle.Horizontal Appearance9.BorderColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.Window Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.GroupByRowAppearance = Appearance9 Appearance10.TextHAlignAsString = "Left" Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.HeaderAppearance = Appearance10 Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.HeaderClickAction = Infragistics.Win.UltraWinGrid.HeaderClickAction.SortMulti Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.HeaderStyle = Infragistics.Win.HeaderStyle.WindowsXPCommand Appearance11.BackColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.Window Appearance11.BorderColor = System.Drawing.Color.Silver Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.RowAppearance = Appearance11 Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.RowSelectors = Infragistics.Win.DefaultableBoolean.[False] Appearance12.BackColor = System.Drawing.SystemColors.ControlLight Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.Override.TemplateAddRowAppearance = Appearance12 Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.ScrollBounds = Infragistics.Win.UltraWinGrid.ScrollBounds.ScrollToFill Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.ScrollStyle = Infragistics.Win.UltraWinGrid.ScrollStyle.Immediate Me.grdCreation.DisplayLayout.ViewStyleBand = Infragistics.Win.UltraWinGrid.ViewStyleBand.OutlookGroupBy Me.grdCreation.Font = New System.Drawing.Font("Times New Roman", 8.25!, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Regular, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, CType(0, Byte)) Me.grdCreation.Location = New System.Drawing.Point(0, 23) Me.grdCreation.Name = "grdCreation" Me.grdCreation.PrintColumnsKey = Nothing Me.grdCreation.PrintRowsIndex = Nothing Me.grdCreation.PrintTitle = Nothing Me.grdCreation.RowsActivation = Infragistics.Win.UltraWinGrid.Activation.AllowEdit Me.grdCreation.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(175, 391) Me.grdCreation.TabIndex = 5 Me.grdCreation.Tag = "" ' 'PlanDeLigne ' Me.AutoScaleDimensions = New System.Drawing.SizeF(6.0!, 13.0!) Me.AutoScaleMode = System.Windows.Forms.AutoScaleMode.Font Me.Controls.Add(Me.SplitContainer) Me.Controls.Add(Me.mnbMenu) Me.MinimumSize = New System.Drawing.Size(605, 431) Me.Name = "PlanDeLigne" Me.Size = New System.Drawing.Size(605, 443) Me.mnbMenu.ResumeLayout(False) Me.mnbMenu.PerformLayout() Me.SplitContainer.Panel1.ResumeLayout(False) Me.SplitContainer.Panel2.ResumeLayout(False) Me.SplitContainer.Panel2.PerformLayout() CType(Me.SplitContainer, System.ComponentModel.ISupportInitialize).EndInit() Me.SplitContainer.ResumeLayout(False) Me.Panel1.ResumeLayout(False) CType(Me.grdCreation, System.ComponentModel.ISupportInitialize).EndInit() Me.ResumeLayout(False) Me.PerformLayout() End Sub

  Read the article

• Grant Ronald - Forms, ADF guru Budapesten!

  - by peter.nagy

  Tudom, késon szólok (blogolok : ), de mégis a lényeg akkor: Grant Ronald lesz a vendégeloadónk az Oracle hazai Technology Forum rendezvényén. Röviden róla: Grant Ronald (Senior Group Product Manager, BSc.) 1989 óta dolgozik az IT iparágban és 1997-ben csatlakozott az Oracle Support Forms/Reports/Discoverer csapatához, melynek késobb vezetoje lett. Jelenleg az Alkalmazás Fejlesztoi Eszközök (köztük Forms és JDeveloper) fejlesztésért felelos csoport tagja. Fo feladata a fejlesztési eszközök stratégiai irányának meghatározása, valamint a Forms felhasználók számára fontos migráció, Java platformra történo áttérés támogatása. Jelen pillanatban tehát meghatározó ember a JEE (ADF) evangelizációban. Ami pedig a legfontosabb Forms aspektusból, 4GL fejlesztok szemszögébol (is)! Tehát aki Forms vagy ADF fejleszto (vagy akar lenni, persze ez utóbbi) vagy egyszeruen meg akar hallgatni egy nagyszeru eloadást JEE és azon belül is Oracle vonatkozásban regisztráljon itt. Fontos! A tervezett eloadások módosulnak, de sajnos az oldalon ez még nem került frissítésre. Amint megtörténik jelzem. Logisztika: 2010. május 5, szerda Novotel Budapest Congress 1123 Budapest, Alkotás u. 63-67.

  Read the article

• Design Issues With Forms

  - by ultan o'broin

  Interesting article on UX Matters, well worth reading, especially the idea that global design research can take for a better user experience in all languages: Label Placement in Austrian Forms, with Some Lessons for English Forms What is perhaps underplayed here is the cultural influence of how people worked with forms in the past, and how a proper global user-centered design process needs to address this issue and move usability gains (in the enterprise space, productivity especially) in the right direction.

  Read the article

• Oracle Forms Migration Forum - 1/Mar/11 - Lisboa

  - by Claudia Costa

    Modernize o seu Investimento em FormsO Oracle Forms é uma tecnologia de longa data da Oracle que permite desenhar e desenvolver aplicações empresariais de forma rápida e eficiente. Em complemento, o Oracle Reports permite um acesso rápido a toda a informação relevante para o negócio.Como membros da família de produtos Oracle Fusion Middleware, o Oracle Forms e o Oracle Reports garantem grande agilidade, melhor tomada de decisões, mitigação de risco e redução de custos para diversos ambientes de TI.Preserve o seu investimento em FormsO compromisso contínuo da Oracle para com a tecnologia Forms vai permitir-lhe actualizar e reintegrar o investimento já existente. Não só as suas aplicações podem ser implantadas para a Web, como poderão também fazer parte de uma Arquitectura Orientada a Serviços (SOA) construída a partir de Web Services.Nesta sessão de meio dia ficará a conhecer todas as opções de migração de Forms para uma tomada de decisão esclarecida.Iremos abordar os seguintes temas: Modernizar o seu investimento. Tire proveito das mais recentes tecnologias. Escolher o caminho acertado para o seu negócio. Evolução no sentido certo. Preservar activos já existentes. Actualize sem perder o que já investiu. Eleve e modernize o legado Forms na sua organização!Clique aqui para se registar neste evento GRATUITO. Para esclarecimentos adicionais envie-nos um email.   AGENDA Registe-se Agora!

  Read the article

• C#.NET Forms programing - Modal and Non-Modal forms problem

  - by Povilas

  Hello, I have a problem with modality of the forms under C#.NET. Let's say I have main form #0 (see the image below). This form represents main application form, where user can perform various operations. However, from time to time, there is a need to open additional non-modal form to perform additional main application functionality supporting tasks. Let's say this is form #1 in the image. On this #1 form there might be opened few additional modal forms on top of each other (#2 form in the image), and at the end, there is a progress dialog showing a long operation progress and status, which might take from few minutes up to few hours. The problem is that the main form #0 is not responsive until you close all modal forms (#2 in the image). I need that the main form #0 would be operational in this situation. However, if you open a non-modal form in form #2, you can operate with both modal #2 form and newly created non modal form. I need the same behavior between the main form #0 and form #1 with all its child forms. Is it possible? Or am I doing something wrong? Maybe there is some kind of workaround, I really would not like to change all ShowDialog calls to ShowDialog... Thanks, Povilas

  Read the article

• Partner Webcast - Upgrade Oracle Forms to 11g version

  - by Dmitry Nefedkin

  Description Oracle Forms, a component of Oracle Fusion Middleware, is Oracle's long-established technology to design and build enterprise applications quickly and efficiently. The latest Oracle Forms release is 11g, and it’s the only release supported right now. During this webinar we are going to explore the architecture and the new features of Oracle Forms 11g, describe the steps required to upgrade from the previous Oracle Forms releases.  If you’re still on Forms 10g or earlier you should not miss a chance to join this webinar.  Agenda Oracle Forms releases/support/license policy Oracle Forms 11g architecture Oracle Forms 11g new features Oracle Forms 11gR2 upgrade steps Installation of the Forms 11g environment Configuring the environment Upgrading Forms Modules Useful links Content The recording is available, use the following link. Or you can just watch the slides below. Upgrade Oracle Forms to 11g View more presentations from Oracle ISV Migration Center.

  Read the article

• Django's forms.Form vs forms.ModelForm

  - by Viet

  Could anyone please explain to me similarities and differences of Django's forms.Form & forms.ModelForm? I've used Django for 4 days, so excuse me if I don't know basic things. Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• How much abstraction is too much?

  - by Daniel Bingham

  In an Object Oriented Program: How much abstraction is too much? How much is just right? I have always been a nuts and bolts kind of guy. I understood the concept behind high levels of encapsulation and abstraction, but always felt instinctively that adding too much would just confuse the program. I always tried to shoot for an amount of abstraction that left no empty classes or layers. And where in doubt, instead of adding a new layer to the hierarchy, I would try and fit something into the existing layers. However, recently I've been encountering more highly abstracted systems. Systems where everything that could require a representation later in the hierarchy gets one up front. This leads to a lot of empty layers, which at first seems like bad design. However, on second thought I've come to realize that leaving those empty layers gives you more places to hook into in the future with out much refactoring. It leaves you greater ability to add new functionality on top of the old with out doing nearly as much work to adjust the old. The two risks of this seem to be that you could get the layers you need wrong. In this case one would wind up still needing to do substantial refactoring to extend the code and would still have a ton of never used layers. But depending on how much time you spend coming up with the initial abstractions, the chance of screwing it up, and the time that could be saved later if you get it right - it may still be worth it to try. The other risk I can think of is the risk of over doing it and never needing all the extra layers. But is that really so bad? Are extra class layers really so expensive that it is much of a loss if they are never used? The biggest expense and loss here would be time that is lost up front coming up with the layers. But much of that time still might be saved later when one can work with the abstracted code rather than more low level code. So when is it too much? At what point do the empty layers and extra "might need" abstractions become overkill? How little is too little? Where's the sweet spot? Are there any dependable rules of thumb you've found in the course of your career that help you judge the amount of abstraction needed?

  Read the article

• Django forms "not" using forms from models

  - by zubinmehta

  I have a form generated from various models and the various values filled go and sit in some other table. Hence, in this case I haven't used the inbuilt Django forms(i.e. I am not creating forms from models ). Now the data which is posted from the self made form is handled by view1 which should clean the data accordingly. How do I go about it and use the various functions clean and define validation errors (and preferably not do validation logic in the view itself!)

  Read the article

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >