Search Results

Search found 5 results on 1 pages for 'johnmcg'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

  • Why would Gwibber feeds be stale?

    - by JohnMcG
    After I installed Ubuntu 10.4, I tried out Gwibber and liked it very much. Next time I logged in, I had the same messages that were there when I logged off, and nothing I did (e.g. unsubscribing/re-subsribing) helped. Anyone know what I could be doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • How long do you hold on to your old programming magazines? [closed]

    - by JohnMcG
    I'm moving offices, and have a file drawer full of old C++ Reports, MSDN Journals, C/C++ Users Journals and other programming journals that are getting close to a decade old. I can't remember referring to them, but it seems wrong to throw them out. Do the rest of you have a drawer full of old programming magazines, or am I couple steps from a Hoarders episode?

    Read the article

  • What is the best signature for overloaded arithmetic operators in C++?

    - by JohnMcG
    I had assumed that the canonical form for operator+, assuming the existence of an overloaded operator+= member function, was like this: const T operator+(const T& lhs, const T& rhs) { return T(lhs) +=rhs; } But it was pointed out to me that this would also work: const T operator+ (T lhs, const T& rhs) { return lhs+=rhs; } In essence, this form transfers creation of the temporary from the body of the implementation to the function call. It seems a little awkward to have different types for the two parameters, but is there anything wrong with the second form? Is there a reason to prefer one over the other?

    Read the article

1