liron - Developer IT

UITableView - Color a selectede cell in table (remain colored)

- by Liron Loop

Hi In my app i'm using a UITableViewController ("grouped style") which in one of its section I want the user to be able to see what he had selected by making this cell colored and other "uncolored". Doing it by updating all cells' background color and reloading table data, each time user touches a cell (in didSelectRowAtIndexPath:) Problem is that there is some processing made in the didSelectRowAtIndexPath: so the color doesn't get changed right a way, rather in a bit delay after touch was made. (I gusse the processing is the resone for the tiny delay) Is there a better way of doing it? Any help will be appreciated Liron P.S. I'm new to all of this...

Read the article

Error loading WebappClassLoader in Tomcat

- by Liron Yahdav

I tried starting Tomcat and deploying my webapp from NetBeans after adding and configuring a new servlet. I got the following in the Tomcat error log: INFO: Marking servlet MyServlet as unavailable SEVERE: Error loading WebappClassLoader delegate: false repositories: /WEB-INF/classes/ ----------> Parent Classloader: org.apache.catalina.loader.StandardClassLoader@bb6086 MyServlet java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: MyServlet at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1387) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1233) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:1095) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.java:809) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:129) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:293) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:849) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:583) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:454) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) SEVERE: Allocate exception for servlet MyServlet java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: MyServlet at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1387) at org.apache.catalina.loader.WebappClassLoader.loadClass(WebappClassLoader.java:1233) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.loadServlet(StandardWrapper.java:1095) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapper.allocate(StandardWrapper.java:809) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:129) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:293) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:849) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:583) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:454) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) I'm using NetBeans 6.8 and Tomcat 6.

Read the article

vb.net | Update DB with OleDB

- by liron

i wrote a module of a connection to DB with OleDB and the 'sub UpdateClients' doesn't work, the DB don't update. what's missing or wrong? Module mdlDB Const CONNECTION_STRING As String = _ "provider= Microsoft.Jet.OleDB.4.0;Data Source=DbHalf.mdb;mode= Share Deny None" Dim daClient As New OleDb.OleDbDataAdapter Dim dsClient As New DataSet Dim cmClient As CurrencyManager Public Sub OpenClients(ByVal txtId, ByVal txtName, ByVal BindingContext) Dim Con As New OleDb.OleDbConnection(CONNECTION_STRING) Dim sqlClient As New OleDb.OleDbCommand Con.Open() sqlClient.CommandText = "SELECT*" sqlClient.CommandText += "FROM tblClubClient" sqlClient.Connection = Con daClient.SelectCommand = sqlClient dsClient.Clear() daClient.Fill(dsClient, "CLUB_CLIENT") cmClient = BindingContext(dsClient, "CLUB_CLIENT") cmClient.Position = 0 txtId.DataBindings.Add("text", dsClient, "CLUB_CLIENT.ClntId") txtName.DataBindings.Add("text", dsClient, "CLUB_CLIENT.ClntName") Con.Close() End Sub Public Sub UpdateClients(ByVal txtId, ByVal txtName, ByVal BindingContext) Dim cb As New OleDb.OleDbCommandBuilder(daClient) cmClient = BindingContext(dsClient, "CLUB_CLIENT") dsClient.Tables("CLUB_CLIENT").Rows(cmClient.Position).Item("ClntId") = txtId.Text dsClient.Tables("CLUB_CLIENT").Rows(cmClient.Position).Item("ClntName") = txtName.Text daClient.Update(dsClient, "CLUB_CLIENT") End Sub End Module

Read the article

Hudson CI project doesn't run NetBeans JUnit tests of dependent projects

- by Liron Yahdav

I have a set of NetBeans java projects with dependencies between them. I added the project at the top of the dependency tree to Hudson for continuous integration. Everything works fine, except that the unit tests of dependent projects don't get run by Hudson. This is because the ant scripts that NetBeans creates has dependent projects setup to run the "jar" target and not a target that also runs the unit tests. I could add ant build steps for each dependent project in Hudson to run the unit tests, but I was hoping there's a simpler solution.

Read the article

Computed properties in NHibernate

- by Liron Levi

I'm having a problem in mapping an existing data class member to the database.. I have a database table where one of the columns is a string type, but actually stores a comma separated list of numbers. My data class shows this field as a list of integers. The problem is that I couldn't find any hook in NHibernate that allows me to invoke the custom code that is required to replace the string field by the list and vice versa. To illustrate (simplified of course): The database table: CREATE TABLE dummy ( id serial, numlist text -- (can store values such as '1,2,3') ) The data class: class Dummy { public int Id; public List<int> NumbersList; } Can anyone help?

Read the article

How do you efficiently bulk index lookups?

- by Liron Shapira

I have these entity kinds: Molecule Atom MoleculeAtom Given a list(molecule_ids) whose lengths is in the hundreds, I need to get a dict of the form {molecule_id: list(atom_ids)}. Likewise, given a list(atom_ids) whose length is in the hunreds, I need to get a dict of the form {atom_id: list(molecule_ids)}. Both of these bulk lookups need to happen really fast. Right now I'm doing something like: atom_ids_by_molecule_id = {} for molecule_id in molecule_ids: moleculeatoms = MoleculeAtom.all().filter('molecule =', db.Key.from_path('molecule', molecule_id)).fetch(1000) atom_ids_by_molecule_id[molecule_id] = [ MoleculeAtom.atom.get_value_for_datastore(ma).id() for ma in moleculeatoms ] Like I said, len(molecule_ids) is in the hundreds. I need to do this kind of bulk index lookup on almost every single request, and I need it to be FAST, and right now it's too slow. Ideas: Will using a Molecule.atoms ListProperty do what I need? Consider that I am storing additional data on the MoleculeAtom node, and remember it's equally important for me to do the lookup in the molecule-atom and atom-molecule directions. Caching? I tried memcaching lists of atom IDs keyed by molecule ID, but I have tons of atoms and molecules, and the cache can't fit it. How about denormalizing the data by creating a new entity kind whose key name is a molecule ID and whose value is a list of atom IDs? The idea is, calling db.get on 500 keys is probably faster than looping through 500 fetches with filters, right?

Read the article

Query.fetch(limit=2000) only moves cursor forward by 1000 entities?

- by Liron

Let's say I have 2500 MyModel entities in my datastore, and I run this code: query = MyModel.all() first_batch = query.fetch(2000) len(first_batch) # 2000 next_query = MyModel.all().with_cursor(query.cursor()) next_batch = next_query.fetch(2000) What do you think len(next_batch) is? 500, right? Nope - it's 1500. Apparently the query cursor never moves forward by more than 1000, even when the query itself returns more than 1000 entities. Should I do something different or is it just an App Engine bug?

Read the article

Can I db.put models without db.getting them first?

- by Liron

I tried to do something like ss = Screenshot(key=db.Key.from_path('myapp_screenshot', 123), name='flowers') db.put([ss, ...]) It seems to work on my dev_appserver, but on live I get this traceback: 05-07 09:50PM 19.964 File "/base/data/home/apps/quixeydev3/12.341796548761906563/common/appenginepatch/appenginepatcher/patch.py", line 600, in put E 05-07 09:50PM 19.964 result = old_db_put(models, *args, **kwargs) E 05-07 09:50PM 19.964 File "/base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/ext/db/init.py", line 1278, in put E 05-07 09:50PM 19.964 keys = datastore.Put(entities, rpc=rpc) E 05-07 09:50PM 19.964 File "/base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/api/datastore.py", line 284, in Put E 05-07 09:50PM 19.965 raise _ToDatastoreError(err) E 05-07 09:50PM 19.965 InternalError: the new entity or index you tried to insert already exists I happen to know just the ID of an existing Screenshot entity I want to update; that's why I was manually constructing its key. Am I doing it wrong?

Read the article

How fast are App Engine db.get(keys) and A.all(keys_only=True).filter('b =', b).fetch(1000)?

- by Liron Shapira

A db.get() of 50 keys seems to take me 5-6 seconds. Is that normal? What is the time a function of? I also did a A.all(keys_only=True).filter('b =', b).fetch(1000) where A.b is a ReferenceProperty. I did 50 such round trips to the datastore, with different values of b, and the total time was only 3-4 seconds. How is this possible? db.get() is done in parallel, with only one trip to the datastore, and I would think that looking up an entity by key is a faster operation than fetch.

Developer IT