Search Results

Search found 19179 results on 768 pages for 'ms security essentials'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 1/768 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • sudo apt-get update errors

    - by Adrian Begi
    Here is what I get on my terminal when running sudo apt-get update errors. I dont know if the issue is from my sources.list or my proxy setup(have not made any changes to proxies). Thank you for any help in advanced. Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release.gpg Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security Release Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Sources/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted Sources/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Sources/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse Sources/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main TranslationIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe TranslationIndex Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Sources 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted Sources 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Sources 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Err http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/main Translation-en Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/restricted Translation-en Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com oneiric-security/universe Translation-en W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric-security/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.15 80] E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. HERE IS MY SOURCES.LIST # # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu-Server 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release amd64 (20111011)]/ dists/oneiric/main/binary-i386/ # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu-Server 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release amd64 (20111011)]/ dists/oneiric/restricted/binary-i386/ # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu-Server 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release amd64 (20111011)]/ oneiric main restricted #deb cdrom:[Ubuntu-Server 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release amd64 (20111011)]/ dists/oneiric/main/binary-i386/ #deb cdrom:[Ubuntu-Server 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release amd64 (20111011)]/ dists/oneiric/restricted/binary-i386/ #deb cdrom:[Ubuntu-Server 11.10 _Oneiric Ocelot_ - Release amd64 (20111011)]/ oneiric main restricted # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric main restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates main restricted ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric universe deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric universe deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates universe deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric multiverse deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates multiverse ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric-security multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. # deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu oneiric partner # deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu oneiric partner ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Ubuntu's ## 'extras' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party ## developers who want to ship their latest software. # deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main # deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu oneiric main

    Read the article

  • Password Security: Short and Complex versus ‘Short or Lengthy’ and Less Complex

    - by Akemi Iwaya
    Creating secure passwords for our online accounts is a necessary evil due to the huge increase in database and account hacking that occurs these days. The problem though is that no two companies have a similar policy for complex and secure password creation, then factor in the continued creation of insecure passwords or multi-site use of the same password and trouble is just waiting to happen. Ars Technica decided to take a look at multiple password types, how users fared with them, and how well those password types held up to cracking attempts in their latest study. The password types that Ars Technica looked at were comprehensive8, basic8, and basic16. The comprehensive type required a variety of upper-case, lower-case, digits, and symbols with no dictionary words allowed. The only restriction on the two basic types was the number of characters used. Which type do you think was easier for users to adopt and did better in the two password cracking tests? You can learn more about how well users did with the three password types and the results of the tests by visiting the article linked below. What are your thoughts on the matter? Are shorter, more complex passwords better or worse than using short or long, but less complex passwords? What methods do you feel work best since most passwords are limited to approximately 16 characters in length? Perhaps you use a service like LastPass or keep a dedicated list/notebook to manage your passwords. Let us know in the comments!    

    Read the article

  • Can't upgrade Windows Server 2012 Essentials to Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials

    - by Magnus
    So today was RTM of Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials released. I immediately tried to do an in-place upgrade of an existing RTM 2012 Essentials to RTM 2012 R2 Essentials, but get: Windows Server 2012 Essentials cannot be upgraded to Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials. You can choose to install a new copy of Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials instead, but this is different from an upgrade, and does not keep your files, settings, and programs. You’ll need to reinstall any programs using the original installation discs or files. To save your files before installing Windows, back them up to an external location such as a CD, DVD, or external hard drive. To install a new copy of Windows Server 2012 R2 Essentials, click the Back button in the upper left-hand corner, and select “Custom (advanced)”. This seems a bit odd, is this really the case? I can't find anything in the official documentation stating that this upgrade isn't possible.

    Read the article

  • VLC 2.0.3 on Lubuntu 12.04: No audio?

    - by drezabek
    I am on Lubuntu 12.04, and I have installed VLC media player version 2.0.3. When I try and play an audio file, it appears to load fine, and the media position bar displays the progress, and it says it is playing, but I can't here any thing through my speakers. I can hear game audio, web audio, and audio from SMPlayer just fine, but with VLC, I can't here anything. Below is the "Messages" output with the verbosity option set to "2 (debug)" main debug: processing request item: The Bottom, node: Playlist, skip: 0 main debug: resyncing on The Bottom main debug: The Bottom is at 0 main debug: starting playback of the new playlist item main debug: resyncing on The Bottom main debug: The Bottom is at 0 main debug: creating new input thread main debug: Creating an input for 'The Bottom' main debug: TIMER input launching for 'Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack - 01 The Bottom.flac' : 23.706 ms - Total 23.706 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 23.706 ms) main debug: using timeshift granularity of 50 MiB, in path '/tmp' main debug: `file:///home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac' gives access `file' demux `' path `/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac' main debug: creating demux: access='file' demux='' location='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac' file='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack - 01 The Bottom.flac' main debug: looking for access_demux module: 3 candidates main debug: no access_demux module matching "file" could be loaded main debug: TIMER module_need() : 2.332 ms - Total 2.332 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 2.332 ms) main debug: creating access 'file' location='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac', path='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack - 01 The Bottom.flac' main debug: looking for access module: 2 candidates filesystem debug: opening file `/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack - 01 The Bottom.flac' main debug: using access module "filesystem" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.762 ms - Total 0.762 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.762 ms) main debug: Using stream method for AStream* main debug: starting pre-buffering main debug: received first data after 0 ms main debug: pre-buffering done 1024 bytes in 0s - 43478 KiB/s main debug: looking for stream_filter module: 7 candidates main debug: no stream_filter module matching "any" could be loaded main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.236 ms - Total 0.236 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.236 ms) main debug: looking for stream_filter module: 1 candidate main debug: using stream_filter module "stream_filter_record" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.156 ms - Total 0.156 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.156 ms) main debug: creating demux: access='file' demux='' location='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac' file='/home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack - 01 The Bottom.flac' main debug: looking for demux module: 54 candidates flacsys debug: Picture type=3 mime=image/png description='' file length=679371 qt4 debug: IM: Setting an input main debug: looking for packetizer module: 21 candidates main debug: using packetizer module "packetizer_flac" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.211 ms - Total 0.211 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.211 ms) main debug: using demux module "flacsys" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 4.023 ms - Total 4.023 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 4.023 ms) main debug: looking for a subtitle file in /home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex - Machinarium Soundtrack/ main debug: looking for meta reader module: 2 candidates main debug: using meta reader module "taglib" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 5.245 ms - Total 5.245 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 5.245 ms) main debug: removing module "taglib" main debug: `file:///home/doug/Music/unsorted/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack/Floex%20-%20Machinarium%20Soundtrack%20-%2001%20The%20Bottom.flac' successfully opened main debug: selecting program id=0 main debug: looking for decoder module: 30 candidates main debug: using decoder module "flac" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.442 ms - Total 0.442 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.442 ms) main debug: Buffering 0% flac debug: decode STREAMINFO flac debug: channels:2 samplerate:44100 bitspersamples:16 flac debug: STREAMINFO decoded main debug: Buffering 30% main debug: recycling audio output main debug: looking for audio output module: 3 candidates main debug: Buffering 61% pulse debug: using stereo channel map pulse debug: using library version 1.1.0 pulse debug: (compiled with version 1.1.0, protocol 26) main debug: Buffering 92% main debug: Stream buffering done (371 ms in 2 ms) pulse debug: connected locally to unix:/home/doug/.pulse/dce22254e867f905188a2ce200000003-runtime/native as client #14 pulse debug: using protocol 26, server protocol 26 pulse debug: using buffer metrics: maxlength=4194304, tlength=9880, prebuf=0, minreq=3528 pulse debug: connected to sink 0: alsa_output.pci-0000_00_14.2.analog-stereo main debug: using audio output module "pulse" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 4.571 ms - Total 4.571 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 4.571 ms) main debug: output 's16l' 44100 Hz Stereo frame=1 samples/4 bytes main debug: mixer 'f32l' 44100 Hz Stereo frame=1 samples/8 bytes main debug: filter(s) 'f32l'->'s16l' 44100 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo main debug: looking for audio filter module: 14 candidates audio_format debug: f32l->s16l, bits per sample: 32->16 main debug: using audio filter module "audio_format" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.187 ms - Total 0.187 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.187 ms) main debug: conversion pipeline completed main debug: looking for audio mixer module: 2 candidates main debug: using audio mixer module "float32_mixer" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.125 ms - Total 0.125 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.125 ms) main debug: input 's16l' 44100 Hz Stereo frame=1 samples/4 bytes main debug: looking for audio filter module: 1 candidate scaletempo debug: format: 44100 rate, 2 nch, 4 bps, fl32 scaletempo debug: params: 30 stride, 0.200 overlap, 14 search scaletempo debug: 1.000 scale, 1323.000 stride_in, 1323 stride_out, 1059 standing, 264 overlap, 617 search, 2204 queue, fl32 mode main debug: using audio filter module "scaletempo" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.233 ms - Total 0.233 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.233 ms) main debug: filter(s) 's16l'->'f32l' 44100 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo pulse debug: listing sink alsa_output.pci-0000_00_14.2.analog-stereo (0): Built-in Audio Analog Stereo main debug: looking for audio filter module: 14 candidates audio_format debug: s16l->f32l, bits per sample: 16->32 main debug: using audio filter module "audio_format" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.147 ms - Total 0.147 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.147 ms) main debug: conversion pipeline completed pulse debug: base volume: 65536 main debug: looking for audio filter module: 1 candidate equalizer debug: equalizer loaded for 44100 Hz with 10 bands 2 pass equalizer debug: 60 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.003013 beta:0.993973 gamma:1.993901 equalizer debug: 170 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.008490 beta:0.983019 gamma:1.982437 equalizer debug: 310 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.015374 beta:0.969252 gamma:1.967331 equalizer debug: 600 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.029328 beta:0.941343 gamma:1.934254 equalizer debug: 1000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.047918 beta:0.904163 gamma:1.884869 equalizer debug: 3000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.130408 beta:0.739184 gamma:1.582718 equalizer debug: 6000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.226555 beta:0.546889 gamma:1.015267 equalizer debug: 12000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.344937 beta:0.310127 gamma:-0.181410 equalizer debug: 14000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.366438 beta:0.267123 gamma:-0.521151 equalizer debug: 16000 Hz -> factor:0.000000 alpha:0.379009 beta:0.241981 gamma:-0.808451 main debug: using audio filter module "equalizer" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.353 ms - Total 0.353 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.353 ms) main debug: filter(s) 'f32l'->'f32l' 44100 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo main debug: conversion pipeline completed main debug: looking for visualization2 module: 1 candidate main debug: looking for text renderer module: 2 candidates freetype debug: Building font databases. freetype debug: Took 0 microseconds freetype debug: Using Serif Bold as font from file /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf freetype debug: using fontsize: 2 main debug: using text renderer module "freetype" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 3.278 ms - Total 3.278 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 3.278 ms) main debug: looking for video filter2 module: 18 candidates swscale debug: 32x32 chroma: YUVA -> 16x16 chroma: RGBA with scaling using Bicubic (good quality) main debug: using video filter2 module "swscale" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 1.037 ms - Total 1.037 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 1.037 ms) main debug: looking for video filter2 module: 18 candidates yuvp debug: YUVP to YUVA converter main debug: using video filter2 module "yuvp" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.156 ms - Total 0.156 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.156 ms) main debug: Deinterlacing available main debug: deinterlace 0, mode blend, is_needed 0 main debug: Opening vout display wrapper main debug: looking for vout display module: 6 candidates main debug: looking for vout window xid module: 4 candidates qt4 debug: requesting video... qt4 debug: Video was requested 0, 0 main debug: using vout window xid module "qt4" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 61.671 ms - Total 61.671 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 61.671 ms) main debug: looking for inhibit module: 2 candidates main debug: using inhibit module "xdg_screensaver" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.336 ms - Total 0.336 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.336 ms) xdg_screensaver debug: started xdg-screensaver (PID = 6682) xcb_xv debug: connected to X11.0 server xcb_xv debug: vendor : The X.Org Foundation xcb_xv debug: version: 11103000 xcb_xv debug: using screen 0x15a xcb_xv debug: using XVideo extension v2.2 xcb_xv debug: using adaptor NV17 Video Texture xcb_xv debug: using port 310 xcb_xv debug: using image format 0x30323449 xcb_xv debug: using X11 visual ID 0x21 (depth: 24) xcb_xv debug: using X11 window 0x03400000 xcb_xv debug: using X11 graphic context 0x03400002 main debug: VoutDisplayEvent 'fullscreen' 0 main debug: VoutDisplayEvent 'resize' 800x500 window main debug: using vout display module "xcb_xv" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 69.890 ms - Total 69.890 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 69.890 ms) main debug: original format sz 800x500, of (0,0), vsz 800x500, 4cc I420, sar 1:1, msk r0x0 g0x0 b0x0 main debug: removing module "freetype" main debug: looking for text renderer module: 2 candidates freetype debug: Building font databases. freetype debug: Took 0 microseconds freetype debug: Using Serif Bold as font from file /usr/share/fonts/truetype/ttf-dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf freetype debug: using fontsize: 2 main debug: using text renderer module "freetype" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 4.552 ms - Total 4.552 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 4.552 ms) main debug: using visualization2 module "visual" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 84.104 ms - Total 84.104 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 84.104 ms) main debug: filter(s) 'f32l'->'f32l' 44100 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo main debug: conversion pipeline completed main debug: filter(s) 'f32l'->'f32l' 44100 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo main debug: conversion pipeline completed main debug: filter(s) 'f32l'->'f32l' 48510 Hz->44100 Hz Stereo->Stereo main debug: looking for audio filter module: 14 candidates main debug: using audio filter module "samplerate" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.375 ms - Total 0.375 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.375 ms) main debug: conversion pipeline completed main debug: End of audio preroll main debug: Decoder buffering done in 91 ms main warning: PTS is out of range (-9269), dropping buffer pulse debug: deferring start (190703 us) main debug: looking for video blending module: 1 candidate main debug: using video blending module "blend" main debug: TIMER module_need() : 0.275 ms - Total 0.275 ms / 1 intvls (Avg 0.275 ms) main debug: Detected interlaced video main debug: deinterlace 0, mode blend, is_needed 1 xcb_xv debug: display is visible pulse debug: starting deferred pulse warning: too late by 93760 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44186 Hz pulse debug: started pulse warning: too late by 94474 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44229 Hz pulse warning: too late by 93532 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44272 Hz pulse warning: too late by 92829 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44315 Hz pulse warning: too late by 92132 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44358 Hz xcb_xv debug: display is visible pulse warning: too late by 91534 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44401 Hz xcb_xv debug: display is visible pulse warning: too late by 89482 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44440 Hz xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible pulse warning: too late by 87529 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44479 Hz pulse warning: too late by 84577 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44504 Hz main debug: auto hiding mouse cursor pulse warning: too late by 78562 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44492 Hz pulse warning: too late by 68015 us pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44422 Hz xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible main debug: auto hiding mouse cursor pulse debug: changed sample rate to 44336 Hz xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible xcb_xv debug: display is visible main debug: auto hiding mouse cursor I have had issues with VLC in the past- the audio quality was extremely crackly, as if the headphone jack was plugged in only half way, and the sounds were extremely sharp and caused my speakers to make a ringing/vibrating noise... It would eventually start working after I messed around with the audio settings, but it happened every restart. I eventually switched to SMPlayer, but now I need some of the features that VLC offers, but I still can't use VLC. At this point, the audio can not be heard at all, and the method I used before, messing around with the audio settings, isn't getting me anywhere. (note, I reposted this on VideoLan's forums, link is here: http://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=104726) Please let me know if you need more information, or are confused by something I posted! Thanks!

    Read the article

  • SQLAuthority News – MS Access Database is the Way to Go – April 1st Humor

    - by pinaldave
    First of all, today is April 1- April Fool’s Day, so I have written this post for some light entertainment. My friend has just sent me an email about why a person should go for Access Database. For a short background, I used to be an MS Access user once (I will not call myself MS Access DBA), and I must say I had a good time with Database at that time. As time passed by, I moved from MS Access to SQL Server. Well, as for my friend’s email, his reasons considering MS Access usage really made me laugh. MS Access may have a few points where it totally makes sense to use it. However, in the email that I received, there was not a single reason which was valid.  In fact, I thought it is an April 1st joke- just delivered a little earlier. Let us see some of the reasons from that email. Thanks to Mahesh Bhesania for sending this email to me. MS Access comes with lots of free stuff, e.g. MS Excel MS Access is the most preferred desktop database system MS Access can import data from MS Excel and SQL Server MS Access provides a real time database MS Access has a free IDE-to-VB Script MS Access fits well in your hard drive I actually think that the above points are either incorrect beliefs of some users, or someone just wrote them to give some laughter with such inaccurate data. And, for the same reason I decided to browse the Internet and do some research on MS Access database to verify my thoughts. While searching on this subject, I found the following two interesting statements from the site: Microsoft Access Database, Why Choose It? Other software manufacturers are more likely to provide interfaces to MS Access than any other desktop database system Microsoft Access consulting rates are typically lower for Access consultants compared to Oracle or SQL Server consultants The second one is may be the worst reason for you to switch to MS Access if you are already an SQL Server consultant. With this cartoon, have you ever felt like you were one of these chickens at some point in time? I guess that the moment might have just happened before the minute we say “I guess we were on the same page?” Does this mean we are IN the same table, or ON the same table?! (I accept bad joke!) It is All Fools’ Day after all, so just laugh! If you have something funny but non-offensive to share, just  leave your comment here. Reference: Pinal Dave (http://blog.SQLAuthority.com), Cartoon source unknown. Filed under: Software Development, SQL, SQL Authority, SQL Humor, SQL Query, SQL Server, SQL Tips and Tricks, SQLAuthority News, T SQL, Technology Tagged: MS ACCESS

    Read the article

  • MS-DOS 6.22 keyboard configuration

    - by AlexV
    I have MS-DOS 6.22 in a virtual machine (Virtual PC 2007) and I wanted to properly configure the keyboard. The keyboard I have is a French-Canadian one (FYI in Windows XP my keyboard is labeled "Français (Canada) - Français (Canada)" in the control pannel). What do I need to put in autoexec.bat and config.sys in order to use the keyboard properly (Windows 3.11 will be installed later if it matters)? I haven't configured DOS since like 14 years so all my references are lost/trashed now :)

    Read the article

  • Framework 4 Features: Summary of Security enhancements

    - by Anthony Shorten
    In the last log entry I mentioned one of the new security features in Oracle Utilities Application Framework 4.0.1. Security is one of the major "tent poles" (to borrow a phrase from Steve Jobs) in this release of the framework. There are a number of security related enhancements requested by customers and as a result of internal reviews that we have introduced. Here is a summary of some of the security enchancements we have added in this release: Security Cache Changes - Security authorization information is automatically cached on the server for performance reasons (security is checked for every single call the product makes for all modes of access). Prior to this release the cache auto-refreshed every 30 minutes (or so). This has beem made more nimble by supporting a cache refresh every minute (or so). This means authorization changes are reflected quicker than before. Business Level security - Business Services are configurable services that are based upon Application Services. Typically, the business service inherited its security profile from its parent service. Whilst this is sufficient for most needs, it is now required to further specify security on the Business Service definition itself. This will allow granular security and allow the same application service to be exposed as different Business Services with their own security. This is particularly useful when you base a Business Service on a query zone. User Propogation - As with other client server applications, the database connections are pooled and shared as needed. This means that a common database user is used to access the database from the pool to allow sharing. Unfortunently, this means that tracability at the database level is that much harder. In Oracle Utilities Application Framework V4 the end userid is now propogated to the database using the CLIENT_IDENTIFIER as part of the Oracle JDBC connection API. This not only means that the common database userid is still used but the end user is indentifiable for the duration of the database call. This can be used for monitoring or to hook into Oracle's database security products. This enhancement is only available to Oracle Database customers. Enhanced Security Definitions - Security Administrators use the product browser front end to control access rights of defined users. While this is sufficient for most sites, a new security portal has been introduced to speed up the maintenance of security information. Oracle Identity Manager Integration - With the popularity of Oracle's Identity Management Suite, the Framework now provides an integration adapter and Identity Manager Generic Transport Connector (GTC) to allow users and group membership to be provisioned to any Oracle Utilities Application Framework based product from Oracle's Identity Manager. This is also available for Oracle Utilties Application Framework V2.2 customers. Refer to My Oracle Support KBid 970785.1 - Oracle Identity Manager Integration Overview. Audit On Inquiry - Typically the configurable audit facility in the Oracle Utilities Application Framework is used to audit changes to records. In Oracle Utilities Application Framework the Business Services and Service Scripts could be configured to audit inquiries as well. Now it is possible to attach auditing capabilities to zones on the product (including base package ones). Time Zone Support - In some of the Oracle Utilities Application Framework based products, the timezone of the end user is a factor in the processing. The user object has been extended to allow the recording of time zone information for use in product functionality. JAAS Suport - Internally the Oracle Utilities Application Framework uses a number of techniques to validate and transmit security information across the architecture. These various methods have been reconciled into using Java Authentication and Authorization Services for standardized security. This is strictly an internal change with no direct on how security operates externally. JMX Based Cache Management - In the last bullet point, I mentioned extra security applied to cache management from the browser. Alternatively a JMX based interface is now provided to allow IT operations to control the cache without the browser interface. This JMX capability can be initiated from a JSR120 compliant JMX console or JMX browser. I will be writing another more detailed blog entry on the JMX enhancements as it is quite a change and an exciting direction for the product line. Data Patch Permissions - The database installer provided with the product required lower levels of security for some operations. At some sites they wanted the ability for non-DBA's to execute the utilities in a controlled fashion. The framework now allows feature configuration to allow delegation for patch execution. User Enable Support - At some sites, the use of temporary staff such as contractors is commonplace. In this scenario, temporary security setups were required and used. A potential issue has arisen when the contractor left the company. Typically the IT group would remove the contractor from the security repository to prevent login using that contractors userid but the userid could NOT be removed from the authorization model becuase of audit requirements (if any user in the product updates financials or key data their userid is recorded for audit purposes). It is now possible to effectively diable the user from the security model to prevent any use of the useridwhilst retaining audit information. These are a subset of the security changes in Oracle Utilities Application Framework. More details about the security capabilities of the product is contained in My Oracle Support KB Id 773473.1 - Oracle Utilities Application Framework Security Overview.

    Read the article

  • Security Essentials not installing and I suspect my machine is infected with malware

    - by Jim
    My mouse seems to be automatically right-clicking every few seconds, and sometimes constantly. My cursor will abruptly become an hourglass for a moment every once in a while, as well. It happens in spurts, as in it hasn't happened for about 10 minutes, but the preceding 20 before that it was happening constantly. I suspect that my machine is infected with malware of some sort, so I've tried installing Microsoft Security Essentials, but it presents the following error upon installation failure: My questions are: How can I solve the MSE installation issue and run a scan? Are there any indications that malware isn't actually my issue? Is MSE my best way to go about solving my issue, assuming that malware actually is the problem? Many thanks!

    Read the article

  • Would Microsoft Security Essentials be adequate protection?

    - by Xavierjazz
    Is Microsoft Security Essentials (MSE) adequate protection for my computer? What is the experience with this product? EDIT. On 2009-10-31 I found out about a comparison of AV Suites. MSE did VERY well. EDIT: One that I found interesting was "Raven", who mentioned that AV software has to hook deeply into the OS, and who better to design this than the designer of the OS. EDIT: My personal experience is that I like it, but I also use Malwarebytes and Superantispyware. Each of them sometimes come up with one the others missed or ignored.

    Read the article

  • The Importance of a Security Assessment - by Michael Terra, Oracle

    - by Darin Pendergraft
    Today's Blog was written by Michael Terra, who was the Subject Matter Expert for the recently announced Oracle Online Security Assessment. You can take the Online Assessment here: Take the Online Assessment Over the past decade, IT Security has become a recognized and respected Business discipline.  Several factors have contributed to IT Security becoming a core business and organizational enabler including, but not limited to, increased external threats and increased regulatory pressure. Security is also viewed as a key enabler for strategic corporate activities such as mergers and acquisitions.Now, the challenge for senior security professionals is to develop an ongoing dialogue within their organizations about the importance of information security and how it can impact their organization's strategic objectives/mission. The importance of conducting regular “Security Assessments” across the IT and physical infrastructure has become increasingly important. Security standards and frameworks, such as the international standard ISO 27001, are increasingly being adopted by organizations and their business partners as proof of their security posture and “Security Assessments” are a great way to ensure a continued alignment to these frameworks.Oracle offers a number of different security assessment covering a broad range of technologies. Some of these are short engagements conducted for free with our strategic customers and partners. Others are longer term paid engagements delivered by Oracle Consulting Services or one of our partners. The goal of a security assessment, (also known as a security audit or security review), is to ensure that necessary security controls are integrated into the design and implementation of a project, application or technology.  A properly completed security assessment should provide documentation outlining any security gaps that exist in an infrastructure and the associated risks for those gaps. With that knowledge, an organization can choose to either mitigate, transfer, avoid or accept the risk. One example of an Oracle offering is a Security Readiness Assessment:The Oracle Security Readiness Assessment is a practical security architecture review focused on aligning an organization’s enterprise security architecture to their business principals and strategic objectives. The service will establish a multi-phase security architecture roadmap focused on supporting new and existing business initiatives.Offering OverviewThe Security Readiness Assessment will: Define an organization’s current security posture and provide a roadmap to a desired future state architecture by mapping  security solutions to business goals Incorporate commonly accepted security architecture concepts to streamline an organization’s security vision from strategy to implementation Define the people, process and technology implications of the desired future state architecture The objective is to deliver cohesive, best practice security architectures spanning multiple domains that are unique and specific to the context of your organization. Offering DetailsThe Oracle Security Readiness Assessment is a multi-stage process with a dedicated Oracle Security team supporting your organization.  During the course of this free engagement, the team will focus on the following: Review your current business operating model and supporting IT security structures and processes Partner with your organization to establish a future state security architecture leveraging Oracle’s reference architectures, capability maps, and best practices Provide guidance and recommendations on governance practices for the rollout and adoption of your future state security architecture Create an initial business case for the adoption of the future state security architecture If you are interested in finding out more, ask your Sales Consultant or Account Manager for details.

    Read the article

  • Why does traceroute take much longer than ping?

    - by PHP
    How to explain this? C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert google.com Tracing route to google.com [64.233.189.104] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 7 ms <1 ms <1 ms reserve.cableplus.com.cn [218.242.223.209] 3 108 ms 135 ms 163 ms 211.154.70.10 4 * * * Request timed out. 5 2 ms * 1 ms 211.154.64.114 6 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 211.154.72.185 7 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 202.96.222.77 8 2 ms 1 ms 2 ms 61.152.81.145 9 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms 61.152.86.54 10 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 202.97.33.238 11 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 202.97.33.54 12 2 ms 1 ms 2 ms 202.97.33.5 13 33 ms 33 ms 33 ms 202.97.61.50 14 34 ms 34 ms 34 ms 202.97.62.214 15 34 ms 186 ms 37 ms 209.85.241.56 16 35 ms 35 ms 44 ms 66.249.94.34 17 34 ms 34 ms 34 ms hkg01s01-in-f104.1e100.net [64.233.189.104] Trace complete. So average time should be :1+7+108+2+1+1+2+1+1+2+2+33+34+34+35+34+34+35+34,which is a lot bigger than ping C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com Pinging google.com [64.233.189.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=241 Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=241 Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=241 Reply from 64.233.189.104: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=241 Ping statistics for 64.233.189.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 34ms, Maximum = 34ms, Average = 34ms

    Read the article

  • Help analyzing traceroute

    - by Abdulla
    Hello, my name is Abdulla and I'm from Kuwait. Sorry for my question as I know its not technically challenging. I'm facing some problems with my internet connection. My company has a DSL 2mb connection. My main problem is latency, in the morning its good but after that its gets really bad. My Internet provider says there's nothing wrong and that everything is working perfectly. I tried to explain to them the latency issue but they say that as long as I'm getting the download speed there isn't anything I can do about it. I only want to know if this is true and that the company can't do anything before I change my internet provider, as I feel that the guys at the contact center might getting back to me without asking tech support. Below are 2 traces I made, one in the morning and the other in the afternoon: This was taken around 17:00 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com Pinging google.com [66.102.9.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=387ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=388ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 375ms, Maximum = 388ms, Average = 381ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com /t Pinging google.com [66.102.9.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=376ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=382ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=371ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=378ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=374ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=371ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=366ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=331ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=348ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=346ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=335ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=340ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=344ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=332ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=326ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=325ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=338ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=341ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.104: Packets: Sent = 26, Received = 26, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 325ms, Maximum = 382ms, Average = 348ms Control-C ^C C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>travert google.com 'travert' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert google.com Tracing route to google.com [66.102.9.104] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 80-184-31-1.adsl.kems.net [80.184.31.1] 3 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms 168.187.0.226 4 7 ms 8 ms 9 ms 168.187.0.125 5 180 ms 187 ms 188 ms if-11-2.core1.RSD-Riyad.as6453.net [116.0.78.89] 6 209 ms 222 ms 204 ms 195.219.167.57 7 541 ms 536 ms 540 ms 195.219.167.42 8 553 ms 552 ms 538 ms Vlan1102.icore1.PVU-Paris.as6453.net [195.219.24 1.109] 9 547 ms 543 ms 542 ms xe-9-1-0.edge4.paris1.level3.net [4.68.110.213] 10 540 ms 523 ms 531 ms ae-33-51.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.139.193] 11 755 ms 761 ms 695 ms ae-45-45.ebr1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.143.101] 12 271 ms 263 ms 400 ms ae-11-51.car1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.139.66] 13 701 ms 730 ms 742 ms 195.50.118.210 14 659 ms 641 ms 660 ms 209.85.255.76 15 280 ms 283 ms 292 ms 209.85.251.190 16 308 ms 293 ms 296 ms 72.14.232.239 17 679 ms 700 ms 721 ms 64.233.174.18 18 268 ms 281 ms 269 ms lm-in-f104.1e100.net [66.102.9.104] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator> This was taken at 10:00am Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com Pinging google.com [66.102.9.106] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.106: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 120ms, Average = 113ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com /t Pinging google.com [66.102.9.106] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.106: Packets: Sent = 32, Received = 32, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 109ms, Maximum = 135ms, Average = 112ms Control-C ^C C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert google.com Tracing route to google.com [66.102.9.104] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 80-184-31-1.adsl.kems.net [80.184.31.1] 3 8 ms 7 ms 6 ms 168.187.0.226 4 6 ms 7 ms 7 ms 168.187.0.125 5 20 ms 20 ms 18 ms if-11-2.core1.RSD-Riyad.as6453.net [116.0.78.89] 6 171 ms 205 ms 215 ms 195.219.167.57 7 191 ms 215 ms 226 ms 195.219.167.42 8 * 103 ms 94 ms Vlan1102.icore1.PVU-Paris.as6453.net [195.219.24 1.109] 9 94 ms 95 ms 97 ms xe-9-1-0.edge4.paris1.level3.net [4.68.110.213] 10 94 ms 94 ms 94 ms ae-33-51.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.139.193] 11 101 ms 101 ms 101 ms ae-48-48.ebr1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.143.113] 12 102 ms 102 ms 101 ms ae-11-51.car1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.139.66] 13 103 ms 102 ms 103 ms 195.50.118.210 14 137 ms 103 ms 100 ms 209.85.255.76 15 130 ms 124 ms 124 ms 209.85.251.190 16 114 ms 116 ms 116 ms 72.14.232.239 17 135 ms 113 ms 126 ms 64.233.174.18 18 126 ms 125 ms 127 ms lm-in-f104.1e100.net [66.102.9.104] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>

    Read the article

  • Please bear with me, can someone analyze this trace route please

    - by Abdulla
    Hello, my name is Abdulla and I'm from Kuwait. Sorry for my question as I know its not technically challenging. I'm facing some problems with my internet connection while gaming, I have DSL 2mb connection. My main problem is latency, in the morning its good but after that its gets really bad. My internet provider says there's nothing wrong and that everything is working perfectly. I tried to explain to them the latency issue but they say that as long as I'm getting the download speed there isn't anything I can do about it. I only want to know if this is true and that the company can't do anything before I change my internet provider, as I feel that the guys at the contact center might getting back to me without asking tech support. Below are 2 traces I made, one in the morning and the other in the afternoon: This was taken around 17:00 Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com Pinging google.com [66.102.9.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=387ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=388ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.104: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 375ms, Maximum = 388ms, Average = 381ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com /t Pinging google.com [66.102.9.104] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=376ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=382ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=371ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=378ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=374ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=371ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=366ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=353ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=331ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=348ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=365ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=346ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=335ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=340ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=344ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=332ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=326ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=325ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=333ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=338ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.104: bytes=32 time=341ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.104: Packets: Sent = 26, Received = 26, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 325ms, Maximum = 382ms, Average = 348ms Control-C ^C C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>travert google.com 'travert' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert google.com Tracing route to google.com [66.102.9.104] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 80-184-31-1.adsl.kems.net [80.184.31.1] 3 7 ms 7 ms 8 ms 168.187.0.226 4 7 ms 8 ms 9 ms 168.187.0.125 5 180 ms 187 ms 188 ms if-11-2.core1.RSD-Riyad.as6453.net [116.0.78.89] 6 209 ms 222 ms 204 ms 195.219.167.57 7 541 ms 536 ms 540 ms 195.219.167.42 8 553 ms 552 ms 538 ms Vlan1102.icore1.PVU-Paris.as6453.net [195.219.24 1.109] 9 547 ms 543 ms 542 ms xe-9-1-0.edge4.paris1.level3.net [4.68.110.213] 10 540 ms 523 ms 531 ms ae-33-51.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.139.193] 11 755 ms 761 ms 695 ms ae-45-45.ebr1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.143.101] 12 271 ms 263 ms 400 ms ae-11-51.car1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.139.66] 13 701 ms 730 ms 742 ms 195.50.118.210 14 659 ms 641 ms 660 ms 209.85.255.76 15 280 ms 283 ms 292 ms 209.85.251.190 16 308 ms 293 ms 296 ms 72.14.232.239 17 679 ms 700 ms 721 ms 64.233.174.18 18 268 ms 281 ms 269 ms lm-in-f104.1e100.net [66.102.9.104] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator> This was taken at 10:00am Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com Pinging google.com [66.102.9.106] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.106: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 120ms, Average = 113ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping google.com /t Pinging google.com [66.102.9.106] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=49 Reply from 66.102.9.106: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=49 Ping statistics for 66.102.9.106: Packets: Sent = 32, Received = 32, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 109ms, Maximum = 135ms, Average = 112ms Control-C ^C C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert google.com Tracing route to google.com [66.102.9.104] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1 2 6 ms 6 ms 6 ms 80-184-31-1.adsl.kems.net [80.184.31.1] 3 8 ms 7 ms 6 ms 168.187.0.226 4 6 ms 7 ms 7 ms 168.187.0.125 5 20 ms 20 ms 18 ms if-11-2.core1.RSD-Riyad.as6453.net [116.0.78.89] 6 171 ms 205 ms 215 ms 195.219.167.57 7 191 ms 215 ms 226 ms 195.219.167.42 8 * 103 ms 94 ms Vlan1102.icore1.PVU-Paris.as6453.net [195.219.24 1.109] 9 94 ms 95 ms 97 ms xe-9-1-0.edge4.paris1.level3.net [4.68.110.213] 10 94 ms 94 ms 94 ms ae-33-51.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net [4.69.139.193] 11 101 ms 101 ms 101 ms ae-48-48.ebr1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.143.113] 12 102 ms 102 ms 101 ms ae-11-51.car1.London1.Level3.net [4.69.139.66] 13 103 ms 102 ms 103 ms 195.50.118.210 14 137 ms 103 ms 100 ms 209.85.255.76 15 130 ms 124 ms 124 ms 209.85.251.190 16 114 ms 116 ms 116 ms 72.14.232.239 17 135 ms 113 ms 126 ms 64.233.174.18 18 126 ms 125 ms 127 ms lm-in-f104.1e100.net [66.102.9.104] Trace complete. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>

    Read the article

  • How to avoid the configuring ms office dialog box

    - by user23950
    I always see the configuring ms office with a an endless progress bar, 2 or more weeks after I installed ms office(2000, 2003, 2010 beta). I'm not exactly sure what it is called but it is trying to configure ms office.Or maybe repairing the installation. And it sucks because when I need to access ms word NOW, I can only see that box with the progress bar. And when I press cancel, it won't open ms word, or maybe the whole suite(ms word, powerpoint, excel) What might be a possible solution to this?anyone here who has encountered it before

    Read the article

  • Comodo Cleaning Essentials for Windows

    Comodo Cleaning Essentials' main purpose is to clean an infected PC. Comodo emphasizes the fact that cleaning an infected PC and protecting a clean PC from potential attacks are two completely separate items. While Comodo Cleaning Essentials specializes in the former, the company does have a preventative solution in the form of its Comodo Internet Security offering, which employs auto sandbox technology to provide ultimate protection. Comodo Cleaning Essentials is highlighted by its two core technologies: KillSwitch and Malware Scanner. KillSwitch operates off of Comodo's whitelist database...

    Read the article

  • Windows 7 - traceroute hop with high latency! [closed]

    - by Mac
    I've been experiencing this problem for quite a while, and it's quite frustrating. I'll do a traceroute, to www.l.google.com, for example. This is the result (please note: I will replace some parts of personal information with text - i.e. ISP.IP is in reality an actual IP address, and ISPNAME replaces the actual ISP name): Tracing route to www.l.google.com [173.194.34.212] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 9 ms 8 ms 10 ms ISP.EXCHANGE.NAME [ISP.IP.172.205] 3 161 ms 171 ms 177 ms host-ISP.IP.215.246.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.215.246] 4 12 ms 9 ms 10 ms host-ISP.IP.215.246.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.215.246] 5 10 ms 9 ms 17 ms host-ISP.IP.224.165.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.224.165] 6 10 ms 9 ms 10 ms 10.42.0.3 7 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms host-ISP.IP.202.129.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.202.129] 8 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms host-ISP.IP.209.33.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.209.33] 9 77 ms 129 ms 164 ms host-ISP.IP.198.162.ISPNAME.net [ISP.IP.198.162] 10 43 ms 42 ms 43 ms 72.14.212.13 11 42 ms 42 ms 42 ms 209.85.252.36 12 59 ms 59 ms 59 ms 209.85.241.210 13 60 ms 76 ms 68 ms 72.14.237.124 14 59 ms 59 ms 58 ms mad01s08-in-f20.1e100.net [173.194.34.212] Trace complete. Notice that there is a spike on the 3rd hop, but also notice that the 3rd and 4th hop are to the exact same destination. Furthermore, when I ping the offended hop separately, I get the low latency I would expect to that server: Pinging ISP.IP.215.246 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253 Reply from ISP.IP.215.246: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253 Ping statistics for ISP.IP.215.246: Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 9ms, Maximum = 12ms, Average = 9ms I'm baffled as to why or how this is happening, and it seems to "fix itself" at random times. Here is an example of where it was working as expected: http://i.imgur.com/bysno.png Notice how many fewer hops were taken. Please note that all the posted results occurred within 10 minutes of testing. I've tried contacting my ISP, and they seem clueless; in their eyes, as long as "the download speed is not slow", then they're doing everything right. Any insight would be very much appreciated, and thanks in advanced!

    Read the article

  • Security as a Service (SecaaS) for Amazon EC2

    - by Dave
    I'm looking for a security as a service (SecaaS) provider or open source solution for Amazon EC2 instances, however I can't seem to find much on Google or elsewhere so was wondering if anyone knows where I could find this service? Ideally I'm looking for something that offers virtual firewalls, email and web security and virtual spam prevention. If anyone has any information on SecaaS i'd appreciate it, Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Website does not resolve in browser but traceroute is successful

    - by Colum
    I am trying to figure out an issue. My internet is working fine, but this one website is not resolving. It works via a proxy, traceroute works: 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 4.205 ms 0.568 ms 0.510 ms 2 * * * 3 67.59.255.13 (67.59.255.13) 10.583 ms 7.949 ms 7.557 ms 4 67.59.255.61 (67.59.255.61) 10.256 ms 9.576 ms 13.083 ms 5 64.15.8.126 (64.15.8.126) 9.943 ms 11.929 ms 11.452 ms 6 64.15.0.217 (64.15.0.217) 14.655 ms 14.092 ms 13.771 ms 7 64.15.0.118 (64.15.0.118) 33.201 ms 34.875 ms 36.544 ms 8 xe-6-0-3.ar1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.169) 34.027 ms 34.957 ms 34.231 ms 9 ae1-30g.cr1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.133) 82.683 ms 35.138 ms 37.592 ms 10 xe-3-0-0.cr2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.142.26) 41.657 ms 34.063 ms 34.519 ms 11 ae2-30g.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.31.186) 35.780 ms 36.361 ms 33.968 ms 12 as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 35.086 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.234) 38.031 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 36.833 ms 13 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.595 ms cr2.iad1.inforelay.net (66.231.176.10) 31.771 ms cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.622 ms 14 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.956 ms 33.625 ms !X 41.058 ms 15 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.312 ms !X * 16 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.814 ms !X * 17 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.459 ms !X * 53.137 ms !X Ping returns this: Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 Request timeout for icmp_seq 5 Request timeout for icmp_seq 6 But what I can not figure out is why my browsers (Firefox, Safari, Opera) can not resolve the domain. I am on a Wifi connection. What could be the problem? BTW I am on a Mac (10.6.5)

    Read the article

  • Website does not resolve in browser but traceroute is successful

    - by Colum
    I am trying to figure out an issue. My internet is working fine, but this one website is not resolving. It works via a proxy, traceroute works: 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 4.205 ms 0.568 ms 0.510 ms 2 * * * 3 67.59.255.13 (67.59.255.13) 10.583 ms 7.949 ms 7.557 ms 4 67.59.255.61 (67.59.255.61) 10.256 ms 9.576 ms 13.083 ms 5 64.15.8.126 (64.15.8.126) 9.943 ms 11.929 ms 11.452 ms 6 64.15.0.217 (64.15.0.217) 14.655 ms 14.092 ms 13.771 ms 7 64.15.0.118 (64.15.0.118) 33.201 ms 34.875 ms 36.544 ms 8 xe-6-0-3.ar1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.169) 34.027 ms 34.957 ms 34.231 ms 9 ae1-30g.cr1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.133) 82.683 ms 35.138 ms 37.592 ms 10 xe-3-0-0.cr2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.142.26) 41.657 ms 34.063 ms 34.519 ms 11 ae2-30g.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.31.186) 35.780 ms 36.361 ms 33.968 ms 12 as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 35.086 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.234) 38.031 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 36.833 ms 13 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.595 ms cr2.iad1.inforelay.net (66.231.176.10) 31.771 ms cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.622 ms 14 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.956 ms 33.625 ms !X 41.058 ms 15 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.312 ms !X * 16 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.814 ms !X * 17 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.459 ms !X * 53.137 ms !X Ping returns this: Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 Request timeout for icmp_seq 5 Request timeout for icmp_seq 6 But what I can not figure out is why my browsers (Firefox, Safari, Opera) can not resolve the domain. I am on a Wifi connection. What could be the problem? BTW I am on a Mac (10.6.5)

    Read the article

  • Website does not resolve in browser but traceroute is successful

    - by Colum
    I am trying to figure out an issue. My internet is working fine, but this one website is not resolving. It works via a proxy, traceroute works: 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 4.205 ms 0.568 ms 0.510 ms 2 * * * 3 67.59.255.13 (67.59.255.13) 10.583 ms 7.949 ms 7.557 ms 4 67.59.255.61 (67.59.255.61) 10.256 ms 9.576 ms 13.083 ms 5 64.15.8.126 (64.15.8.126) 9.943 ms 11.929 ms 11.452 ms 6 64.15.0.217 (64.15.0.217) 14.655 ms 14.092 ms 13.771 ms 7 64.15.0.118 (64.15.0.118) 33.201 ms 34.875 ms 36.544 ms 8 xe-6-0-3.ar1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.169) 34.027 ms 34.957 ms 34.231 ms 9 ae1-30g.cr1.ord1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.111.133) 82.683 ms 35.138 ms 37.592 ms 10 xe-3-0-0.cr2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.22.142.26) 41.657 ms 34.063 ms 34.519 ms 11 ae2-30g.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.31.186) 35.780 ms 36.361 ms 33.968 ms 12 as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 35.086 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.234) 38.031 ms as33597.xe-3-0-7.ar2.iad1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.30.230) 36.833 ms 13 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.595 ms cr2.iad1.inforelay.net (66.231.176.10) 31.771 ms cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.622 ms 14 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.956 ms 33.625 ms !X 41.058 ms 15 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.312 ms !X * 16 * cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 32.814 ms !X * 17 cr1.iad2.inforelay.net (66.231.176.246) 35.459 ms !X * 53.137 ms !X Ping returns this: Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 Request timeout for icmp_seq 5 Request timeout for icmp_seq 6 But what I can not figure out is why my browsers (Firefox, Safari, Opera) can not resolve the domain. I am on a Wifi connection. What could be the problem? BTW I am on a Mac (10.6.5)

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >