Search Results

Search found 9215 results on 369 pages for 'double pointers'.

Page 10/369 | < Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >

  • Double indirection and structures passed into a function

    - by ZPS
    I am curious why this code works: typedef struct test_struct { int id; } test_struct; void test_func(test_struct ** my_struct) { test_struct my_test_struct; my_test_struct.id=267; *my_struct = &my_test_struct; } int main () { test_struct * main_struct; test_func(&main_struct); printf("%d\n",main_struct->id); } This works, but pointing to the memory address of a functions local variable is a big no-no, right? But if i used a structure pointer and malloc, that would be the correct way, right? void test_func(test_struct ** my_struct) { test_struct *my_test_struct; my_test_struct = malloc(sizeof(test_struct)); my_test_struct->id=267; *my_struct = my_test_struct; } int main () { test_struct * main_struct; test_func(&main_struct); printf("%d\n",main_struct->id); }

    Read the article

  • Avoid incompatible pointer warning when dealing with double-indirection

    - by fnawothnig
    Assuming this program: #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> static void ring_pool_alloc(void **p, size_t n) { static unsigned char pool[256], i = 0; *p = &pool[i]; i += n; } int main(void) { char *str; ring_pool_alloc(&str, 7); strcpy(str, "foobar"); printf("%s\n", str); return 0; } ... is it possible to somehow avoid the GCC warning test.c:12: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘ring_pool_alloc’ from incompatible pointer type test.c:4: note: expected ‘void **’ but argument is of type ‘char **’ ... without casting to (void**) (or simply disabling the compatibility checks)? Because I would very much like to keep compatibility warnings regarding indirection-level...

    Read the article

  • (gcc) Multi-Dim Array or Double Pointer for Warning-free Compile

    - by paul simmons
    Hi, I have a function, which is called sometimes with regular, sometimes dynamic arrays. If I define the function as function_name(int[10][10] a) and send int** as a parameter, I get a warning. Opposite, if I declare function_name(int** a) and send int[][] as a parameter (after casting) I cannot access to array elements inside function. What is the correctest way?

    Read the article

  • Printing double variable contents

    - by Adil
    I tried following code snippet and output is surprising me: #include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> int main() { double num; unsigned char ch; ch = 19; num = 1.0E+20 ; num += ch * 1.0E+18; printf("E18 = %lf \n",num); printf("E18 = %e \n",num); num = 11.0E+21 ; num += ch * 1.0E+19; printf("E19 = %lf <------\n",num); printf("E19 = %e <------\n",num); num = 11.0E+22 ; num += ch * 1.0E+20; printf("E20 = %lf\n",num); printf("E20 = %e\n",num); num = 11.0E+23 ; num += ch * 1.0E+21; printf("E21 = %lf\n",num); printf("E21 = %e\n",num); num = 11.0E+24 ; num += ch * 1.0E+22; printf("E22 = %lf <------\n",num); printf("E22 = %e <------\n",num); return 0; } The output of the program: E18 = 119000000000000000000.000000 E18 = 1.190000e+20 E19 = 11190000000000000524288.000000 <------ E19 = 1.119000e+22 <------ E20 = 111900000000000001048576.000000 E20 = 1.119000e+23 E21 = 1119000000000000044040192.000000 E21 = 1.119000e+24 E22 = 11189999999999999366660096.000000 <------ E22 = 1.119000e+25 <------ Why the data corrupted when printed while in exponent form its OK

    Read the article

  • ASP.Net - Help with datagrid/checkboxes/double submit

    - by Gareth D
    We have a simple datagrid. Each row has a checkbox. The checkbox is set to autopostback, and the code-behind has an event handler for the checkbox check-changed event. This all works as expected, nothing complicated. However, we want to disable the checkboxes as soon as one is checked to prevent a double submit i.e. check box checked, all checkboxes are disabled via client side javascript, form submitted. To achieve this I we are injecting some code into the onclick event as follows (note that the alert is just for testing!): Protected Sub DgAccounts_ItemCreated(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.Web.UI.WebControls.DataGridItemEventArgs) Handles DgAccounts.ItemCreated If e.Item.ItemType = ListItemType.Item Or e.Item.ItemType = ListItemType.AlternatingItem Then Dim chk As CheckBox = CType(e.Item.FindControl("chkItemChecked"), CheckBox) chk.Attributes.Add("onclick", "alert('fired ...');DisableAllDataGridCheckBoxes();") End If End Sub When inspecting the source of the rendered page we get the following: <input id="DgAccounts__ctl2_chkItemChecked" type="checkbox" name="DgAccounts:_ctl2:chkItemChecked" onclick="alert('fired ...');DisableAllDataGridCheckBoxes();setTimeout('__doPostBack(\'DgAccounts$_ctl2$chkItemChecked\',\'\')', 0)" language="javascript" /> It all appears in order, however the server side event does not fire – I believe this is due to the checkbox being disabled, as if we just leave the alert in and remove the call to disable the checkbox it all works fine. Can I force the check-changed event to fire even though the check box is disabled?

    Read the article

  • Efficiency of Java "Double Brace Initialization"?

    - by Jim Ferrans
    In Hidden Features of Java the top answer mentions Double Brace Initialization, with a very enticing syntax: Set<String> flavors = new HashSet<String>() {{ add("vanilla"); add("strawberry"); add("chocolate"); add("butter pecan"); }}; This idiom creates an anonymous inner class with just an instance initializer in it, which "can use any [...] methods in the containing scope". Main question: Is this as inefficient as it sounds? Should its use be limited to one-off initializations? (And of course showing off!) Second question: The new HashSet must be the "this" used in the instance initializer ... can anyone shed light on the mechanism? Third question: Is this idiom too obscure to use in production code? Summary: Very, very nice answers, thanks everyone. On question (3), people felt the syntax should be clear (though I'd recommend an occasional comment, especially if your code will pass on to developers who may not be familiar with it). On question (1), The generated code should run quickly. The extra .class files do cause jar file clutter, and slow program startup slightly (thanks to coobird for measuring that). Thilo pointed out that garbage collection can be affected, and the memory cost for the extra loaded classes may be a factor in some cases. Question (2) turned out to be most interesting to me. If I understand the answers, what's happening in DBI is that the anonymous inner class extends the class of the object being constructed by the new operator, and hence has a "this" value referencing the instance being constructed. Very neat. Overall, DBI strikes me as something of an intellectual curiousity. Coobird and others point out you can achieve the same effect with Arrays.asList, varargs methods, Google Collections, and the proposed Java 7 Collection literals. Newer JVM languages like Scala, JRuby, and Groovy also offer concise notations for list construction, and interoperate well with Java. Given that DBI clutters up the classpath, slows down class loading a bit, and makes the code a tad more obscure, I'd probably shy away from it. However, I plan to spring this on a friend who's just gotten his SCJP and loves good natured jousts about Java semantics! ;-) Thanks everyone!

    Read the article

  • Problem using void pointer as a function argument

    - by Nazgulled
    Hi, I can't understand this result... The code: void foo(void * key, size_t key_sz) { HashItem *item = malloc(sizeof(HashItem)); printf("[%d]\n", (int)key); ... item->key = malloc(key_sz); memcpy(item->key, key, key_sz); } void bar(int num) { foo(&num, sizeof(int)); } And I do this call: bar(900011009); But the printf() output is: [-1074593956] I really need key to be a void pointer, how can I fix this?

    Read the article

  • C - Complicated pointer declarations - help understanding

    - by Emmel
    In my burgeoning new self-education in the C language, I've come across a set of declarations that I do not understand how to read. I'd love for someone to break these down. I'll explain at the bottom where I got these examples from. 1. char (*(*x())[])() "x: function returning pointer to array[] of pointer to function returning char" - huh? 2. char (*(*x[3])())[5] "x: array[3] of pointer to function returning pointer to array[5] of char" - come again? 3. char **argv This I understand. "Pointer to pointer to char." But what I don't understand is -- what's the use case for a pointer to a pointer? Follow-up question: does anyone every use declarations this complex or is this just academic fun on the part of the authors of the examples I got this from? These examples are from section 5.12 of the K&R book. This is the first time I'm genuinely stumped by an explanation, in an otherwise well-written classic. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Function pointer demo

    - by AKN
    Hi, Check the below code void functionptrdemo() { typedef int *(funcPtr) (int,int); funcPtr ptr; ptr = add; //IS THIS CORRECT? (*ptr)(2,3); } In the place where I try to assign a function to function ptr with same function signature, it shows a compilation error as error C2659: '=' : function as left operand

    Read the article

  • Assign C++ instance method to a global-function-pointer ?

    - by umanga
    Greetings, My project structure is as follows: \- base (C static library) callbacks.h callbacks.c paint_node.c . . * libBase.a \-app (C++ application) main.cpp In C library 'base' , I have declared global-function-pointer as: in singleheader file callbacks.h #ifndef CALLBACKS_H_ #define CALLBACKS_H_ extern void (*putPixelCallBack)(); extern void (*putImageCallBack)(); #endif /* CALLBACKS_H_ */ in single C file they are initialized as callbacks.c #include "callbacks.h" void (*putPixelCallBack)(); void (*putImageCallBack)(); Other C files access this callback-functions as: paint_node.c #include "callbacks.h" void paint_node(node *node,int index){ //Call callbackfunction . . putPixelCallBack(node->x,node->y,index); } I compile these C files and generate a static library 'libBase.a' Then in C++ application, I want to assign C++ instance method to this global function-pointer: I did something like follows : in Sacm.cpp file #include "Sacm.h" extern void (*putPixelCallBack)(); extern void (*putImageCallBack)(); void Sacm::doDetection() { putPixelCallBack=(void(*)())&paintPixel; //call somefunctions in 'libBase' C library } void Sacm::paintPixel(int x,int y,int index) { qpainter.begin(this); qpainter.drawPoint(x,y); qpainter.end(); } But when compiling it gives the error: sacmtest.cpp: In member function ‘void Sacm::doDetection()’: sacmtest.cpp:113: error: ISO C++ forbids taking the address of an unqualified or parenthesized non-static member function to form a pointer to member function. Say ‘&Sacm::paintPixel’ sacmtest.cpp:113: error: converting from ‘void (Sacm::)(int, int, int)’ to ‘void ()()’ Any tips?

    Read the article

  • Passing a pointer to a function that doesn't match the requirements of the formal parameter

    - by Andreas Grech
    int valid (int x, int y) { return x + y; } int invalid (int x) { return x; } int func (int *f (int, int), int x, int y) { //f is a pointer to a function taking 2 ints and returning an int return f(x, y); } int main () { int val = func(valid, 1, 2), inval = func(invalid, 1, 2); // <- 'invalid' does not match the contract printf("Valid: %d\n", val); printf("Invalid: %d\n", inval); /* Output: * Valid: 3 * Invalid: 1 */ } At the line inval = func(invalid, 1, 2);, why am I not getting a compiler error? If func expects a pointer to a function taking 2 ints and I pass a pointer to a function that takes a single int, why isn't the compiler complaining? Also, since this is happening, what happens to the second parameter y in the invalid function?

    Read the article

  • Why can operator-> be overloaded manually?

    - by FredOverflow
    Wouldn't it make sense if p->m was just syntactic sugar for (*p).m? Essentially, every operator-> that I have ever written could have been implemented as follows: Foo::Foo* operator->() { return &**this; } Is there any case where I would want p->m to mean something else than (*p).m?

    Read the article

  • C++: How do I pass a function(without knowing its parameters) to another function?

    - by Ninja
    Hi all. I'm trying to create a function that will store and repeat another function given as a parameter for a specific amount of time or repeats given. But when you want to pass a function as a parameter you have to know all of its parameters before hand. How would I do if I wanted to pass the function as one parameter, and the parameters as another? void AddTimer(float time, int repeats, void (*func), params); // I know params has no type and that (*func) is missing parameters but it is just to show you what I mean Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Start a thread using a method pointer

    - by Michael
    Hi ! I'm trying to develop a thread abstraction (POSIX thread and thread from the Windows API), and I would very much like it to be able to start them with a method pointer, and not a function pointer. What I would like to do is an abstraction of thread being a class with a pure virtual method "runThread", which would be implanted in the future threaded class. I don't know yet about the Windows thread, but to start a POSIX thread, you need a function pointer, and not a method pointer. And I can't manage to find a way to associate a method with an instance so it could work as a function. I probably just can't find the keywords (and I've been searching a lot), I think it's pretty much what Boost::Bind() does, so it must exist. Can you help me ?

    Read the article

  • [C++] Start a thread using a method pointer

    - by Michael
    Hi ! I'm trying to develop a thread abstraction (POSIX thread and thread from the Windows API), and I would very much like it to be able to start them with a method pointer, and not a function pointer. What I would like to do is an abstraction of thread being a class with a pure virtual method "runThread", which would be implanted in the future threaded class. I don't know yet about the Windows thread, but to start a POSIX thread, you need a function pointer, and not a method pointer. And I can't manage to find a way to associate a method with an instance so it could work as a function. I probably just can't find the keywords (and I've been searching a lot), I think it's pretty much what Boost::Bind() does, so it must exist. Can you help me ?

    Read the article

  • Error codes for C++

    - by billy
    #include <iostream> #include <iomanip> using namespace std; //Global constant variable declaration const int MaxRows = 8, MaxCols = 10, SEED = 10325; //Functions Declaration void PrintNameHeader(ostream& out); void Fill2DArray(double ary[][MaxCols]); void Print2DArray(const double ary[][MaxCols]); double GetTotal(const double ary[][MaxCols]); double GetAverage(const double ary[][MaxCols]); double GetRowTotal(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theRow); double GetColumnTotal(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theRow); double GetHighestInRow(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theRow); double GetLowestInRow(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theRow); double GetHighestInCol(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theCol); double GetLowestInCol(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theCol); double GetHighest(const double ary[][MaxCols], int& theRow, int& theCol); double GetLowest(const double ary[][MaxCols], int& theRow, int& theCol); int main() { int theRow; int theCol; PrintNameHeader(cout); cout << fixed << showpoint << setprecision(1); srand(static_cast<unsigned int>(SEED)); double ary[MaxRows][MaxCols]; cout << "The seed value for random number generator is: " << SEED << endl; cout << endl; Fill2DArray(ary); Print2DArray(ary); cout << " The Total for all the elements in this array is: " << setw(7) << GetTotal(ary) << endl; cout << "The Average of all the elements in this array is: " << setw(7) << GetAverage(ary) << endl; cout << endl; cout << "The sum of each row is:" << endl; for(int index = 0; index < MaxRows; index++) { cout << "Row " << (index + 1) << ": " << GetRowTotal(ary, theRow) << endl; } cout << "The highest and lowest of each row is: " << endl; for(int index = 0; index < MaxCols; index++) { cout << "Row " << (index + 1) << ": " << GetHighestInRow(ary, theRow) << " " << GetLowestInRow(ary, theRow) << endl; } cout << "The highest and lowest of each column is: " << endl; for(int index = 0; index < MaxCols; index++) { cout << "Col " << (index + 1) << ": " << GetHighestInCol(ary, theRow) << " " << GetLowestInCol(ary, theRow) << endl; } cout << "The highest value in all the elements in this array is: " << endl; cout << GetHighest(ary, theRow, theCol) << "[" << theRow << "]" << "[" << theCol << "]" << endl; cout << "The lowest value in all the elements in this array is: " << endl; cout << GetLowest(ary, theRow, theCol) << "[" << theRow << "]" << "[" << theCol << "]" << endl; return 0; } //Define Functions void PrintNameHeader(ostream& out) { out << "*******************************" << endl; out << "* *" << endl; out << "* C.S M10A Spring 2010 *" << endl; out << "* Programming Assignment 10 *" << endl; out << "* Due Date: Thurs. Mar. 25 *" << endl; out << "*******************************" << endl; out << endl; } void Fill2DArray(double ary[][MaxCols]) { for(int index1 = 0; index1 < MaxRows; index1++) { for(int index2= 0; index2 < MaxCols; index2++) { ary[index1][index2] = (rand()%1000)/10; } } } void Print2DArray(const double ary[][MaxCols]) { cout << " Column "; for(int index = 0; index < MaxCols; index++) { int column = index + 1; cout << " " << column << " "; } cout << endl; cout << " "; for(int index = 0; index < MaxCols; index++) { int column = index +1; cout << "----- "; } cout << endl; for(int index1 = 0; index1 < MaxRows; index1++) { cout << "Row " << (index1 + 1) << ":"; for(int index2= 0; index2 < MaxCols; index2++) { cout << setw(6) << ary[index1][index2]; } } } double GetTotal(const double ary[][MaxCols]) { double total = 0; for(int theRow = 0; theRow < MaxRows; theRow++) { total = total + GetRowTotal(ary, theRow); } return total; } double GetAverage(const double ary[][MaxCols]) { double total = 0, average = 0; total = GetTotal(ary); average = total / (MaxRows * MaxCols); return average; } double GetRowTotal(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theRow) { double sum = 0; for(int index = 0; index < MaxCols; index++) { sum = sum + ary[theRow][index]; } return sum; } double GetColumTotal(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theCol) { double sum = 0; for(int index = 0; index < theCol; index++) { sum = sum + ary[index][theCol]; } return sum; } double GetHighestInRow(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theRow) { double highest = 0; for(int index = 0; index < MaxCols; index++) { if(ary[theRow][index] > highest) highest = ary[theRow][index]; } return highest; } double GetLowestInRow(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theRow) { double lowest = 0; for(int index = 0; index < MaxCols; index++) { if(ary[theRow][index] < lowest) lowest = ary[theRow][index]; } return lowest; } double GetHighestInCol(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theCol) { double highest = 0; for(int index = 0; index < MaxRows; index++) { if(ary[index][theCol] > highest) highest = ary[index][theCol]; } return highest; } double GetLowestInCol(const double ary[][MaxCols], int theCol) { double lowest = 0; for(int index = 0; index < MaxRows; index++) { if(ary[index][theCol] < lowest) lowest = ary[index][theCol]; } return lowest; } double GetHighest(const double ary[][MaxCols], int& theRow, int& theCol) { theRow = 0; theCol = 0; double highest = ary[theRow][theCol]; for(int index = 0; index < MaxRows; index++) { for(int index1 = 0; index1 < MaxCols; index1++) { double highest = 0; if(ary[index1][theCol] > highest) { highest = ary[index][index1]; theRow = index; theCol = index1; } } } return highest; } double Getlowest(const double ary[][MaxCols], int& theRow, int& theCol) { theRow = 0; theCol = 0; double lowest = ary[theRow][theCol]; for(int index = 0; index < MaxRows; index++) { for(int index1 = 0; index1 < MaxCols; index1++) { double lowest = 0; if(ary[index1][theCol] < lowest) { lowest = ary[index][index1]; theRow = index; theCol = index1; } } } return lowest; } . 1>------ Build started: Project: teddy lab 10, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ 1>Compiling... 1>lab 10.cpp 1>c:\users\owner\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\teddy lab 10\teddy lab 10\ lab 10.cpp(46) : warning C4700: uninitialized local variable 'theRow' used 1>c:\users\owner\documents\visual studio 2008\projects\teddy lab 10\teddy lab 10\ lab 10.cpp(62) : warning C4700: uninitialized local variable 'theCol' used 1>Linking... 1> lab 10.obj : error LNK2028: unresolved token (0A0002E0) "double __cdecl GetLowest(double const (* const)[10],int &,int &)" (?GetLowest@@$$FYANQAY09$$CBNAAH1@Z) referenced in function "int __cdecl main(void)" (?main@@$$HYAHXZ) 1> lab 10.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "double __cdecl GetLowest(double const (* const)[10],int &,int &)" (?GetLowest@@$$FYANQAY09$$CBNAAH1@Z) referenced in function "int __cdecl main(void)" (?main@@$$HYAHXZ) 1>C:\Users\owner\Documents\Visual Studio 2008\Projects\ lab 10\Debug\ lab 10.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 2 unresolved externals 1>Build log was saved at "file://c:\Users\owner\Documents\Visual Studio 2008\Projects\ lab 10\teddy lab 10\Debug\BuildLog.htm" 1>teddy lab 10 - 3 error(s), 2 warning(s) ========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ==========

    Read the article

  • Binary files printing and desired precision

    - by yCalleecharan
    Hi, I'm printing a variable say z1 which is a 1-D array containing floating point numbers to a text file so that I can import into Matlab or GNUPlot for plotting. I've heard that binary files (.dat) are smaller than .txt files. The definition that I currently use for printing to a .txt file is: void create_out_file(const char *file_name, const long double *z1, size_t z_size){ FILE *out; size_t i; if((out = _fsopen(file_name, "w+", _SH_DENYWR)) == NULL){ fprintf(stderr, "***> Open error on output file %s", file_name); exit(-1); } for(i = 0; i < z_size; i++) fprintf(out, "%.16Le\n", z1[i]); fclose(out); } I have three questions: Are binary files really more compact than text files?; If yes, I would like to know how to modify the above code so that I can print the values of the array z1 to a binary file. I've read that fprintf has to be replaced with fwrite. My output file say dodo.dat should contain the values of array z1 with one floating number per line. I have %.16Le up in my code but I think that %.15Le is right as I have 15 precision digits with long double. I have put a dot (.) in the width position as I believe that this allows expansion to an arbitrary field to hold the desired number. Am I right? As an example with %.16Le, I can have an output like 1.0047914240730432e-002 which gives me 16 precision digits and the width of the field has the right width to display the number correctly. Is placing a dot (.) in the width position instead of a width value a good practice? Thanks a lot...

    Read the article

  • Single and Double Jump with single button.

    - by Asad
    I want to make Single Jump on Single Tap and Double Jump on Double Tap. My problem is that if I make double Tap on ground then it’s fine but if I make first Tap on ground and second Tap in Air then Player gain more height then usual As in image 1. I want to Make my jump like in Image 2, No matter from which point user gives second Tap, player Always get a specific height. I Used both Impulse and Linear velocity to make Jump but my problem did not solved.

    Read the article

  • Flash Double-click an externally loaded SWF

    - by Trist
    OK. I've got a class (which extends MovieClip) that loads in an external SWF (made in pdf2swf). That is added to another class which has declared doubleClickEnabled = true and I'm listening for DOUBLE_CLICK events. Problem is when the SWF is loaded my code picks up no DOUBLE_CLICK events, only CLICK events. I've tried it without adding the SWF to the stage and it does pick up DOUBLE_CLICK events. Anybody come across this before? class ParentClass{ ... public function ParentClass(){ ... mcToLoadSWF = new MovieClip(); addChild(mcToLoadSWF); doubleClickEnabled = true; addEventListener(MouseEvent.DOUBLE_CLICK, doubleClickHandler); ... } } I've also tried adding the event listener to the mcToLoadSWF as well. No dice. Cheers Tristian

    Read the article

  • C# define string format of double/floats to be US english by default

    - by neil
    Hi, I have got several thousands of lines of a web application source code, initially written on a US development system, to maintain. It makes heavy use of SQL statement strings, which are combined on the fly, e.g. string SQL = "select * from table where double_value = " + Math.Round(double_value, 2); Don't comment on bad programming style, that doesn't help me in this case :) The cruix: My system uses a German locale, which in turn leads to wrong SQL statements, like this: "select * from table where double_value = 15,5" (Note the comma as decimal separator instead of a point). Question: What is the most "elegant" way to change the locale of the web app in this case) to US or UK in order to prevent being forced to change and inspect every single line of code? .net 3.5 is not an option (would give me the chance to overwrite ToString() in an extension class) Kind regards

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >