Search Results

Search found 255653 results on 10227 pages for 'exception stack trace'.

Page 10/10227 | < Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >

  • To get which function throwed exception in javascript

    - by uzay95
    I am trying to create a Exception class to get and send errors from client to server. I want to catch exception in javascript function and push the details to the web service to write to database. But i couldn't get how to get which function/line throwed this exception. Is there any way to solve this?

    Read the article

  • How can I make Ruby rake display the full backtrace on uncaught exception

    - by Martinos
    As you may know rake swallows the full backtrace on uncaught exception. If I want to have a full backtrace, I need to add the --trace option. I find this very annoying because some of my tasks take long time to run (up to 6 hours), when it crashes I don't have any debugging info. I need to run it again with the --trace. On top of that, the system may not be in the same state as when the error occurred, so it may not show afterward. I always have to add --trace on any tasks. This displasy stuff that I don't want to see when the task is executed. Is there a way to change this default behaviour? (which I don't think is useful at all)

    Read the article

  • Java: is Exception class thread-safe?

    - by Vilius Normantas
    As I understand, Java's Exception class is certainly not immutable (methods like initCause and setStackTrace give some clues about that). So is it at least thread-safe? Suppose one of my classes has a field like this: private final Exception myException; Can I safely expose this field to multiple threads? I'm not willing to discuss concrete cases where and why this situation could occur. My question is more about the principle: can I tell that a class which exposes field of Exception type is thread-safe? Another example: class CustomException extends Exception { ... } Is this class thread-safe?

    Read the article

  • Continue executing with thrown exception?

    - by fsdfa
    There's something really weird, I have (in C++): func(); cout << "Heeey" << endl; And func, throws an exception: "throw string("ERROR");". But the cout is done, and the exception is successfully catched. Why it prints "Heeey" if there was an exception before?.

    Read the article

  • Exception handling - what happens after it leaves catch

    - by Tony
    So imagine you've got an exception you're catching and then in the catch you write to a log file that some exception occurred. Then you want your program to continue, so you have to make sure that certain invariants are still in a a good state. However what actually occurs in the system after the exception was "handled" by a catch? The stack has been unwound at that point so how does it get to restore it's state?

    Read the article

  • Exception Handling in MVP Passive View

    - by ilmatte
    Hello, I'm wondering what's the preferred way to manage exceptions in an MVP implemented with a Passive View. There's a discussion in my company about putting try/catch blocks in the presenter or only in the view. In my opinion the logical top level caller is the presenter (even if the actual one is the view). Moreover I can test the presenter and not the view. This is the reason why I prefer to define a method in the view interface: IView.ShowError(error) and invoke it from the catch blocks in the presenter: try { } catch (Exception exception) { ...log exception... view.ShowError("An error occurred") } In this way the developers of future views can safely forget to implement exception handling but the IView interface force them to implement a ShowError method. The drawback is that if I want to feel completely safe I need to add redundant try/catch blocks in the view. The other way would be to add try catch blocks only in the views and not introducing the showerror method in the view interface. What do you suggest?

    Read the article

  • Windows/C++: Is it possible to find the line of code where exception was thrown having "Exception Of

    - by Pavel
    One of our users having an Exception on our product startup. She has sent us the following error message from Windows: Problem Event Name: APPCRASH Application Name: program.exe Application Version: 1.0.0.1 Application Timestamp: 4ba62004 Fault Module Name: agcutils.dll Fault Module Version: 1.0.0.1 Fault Module Timestamp: 48dbd973 Exception Code: c0000005 Exception Offset: 000038d7 OS Version: 6.0.6002.2.2.0.768.2 Locale ID: 1033 Additional Information 1: 381d Additional Information 2: fdf78cd6110fd6ff90e9fff3d6ab377d Additional Information 3: b2df Additional Information 4: a3da65b92a4f9b2faa205d199b0aa9ef Is it possible to locate the exact place in the source code where the exception has occured having this information? What is the common technique for C++ programmers on Windows to locate the place of an error that has occured on user computer? Our project is compiled with Release configuration, PDB file is generated. I hope my question is not too naive.

    Read the article

  • Confused by this PHP Exception try..catch nesting

    - by Domenic
    Hello. I'm confused by the following code: class MyException extends Exception {} class AnotherException extends MyException {} class Foo { public function something() { print "throwing AnotherException\n"; throw new AnotherException(); } public function somethingElse() { print "throwing MyException\n"; throw new MyException(); } } $a = new Foo(); try { try { $a->something(); } catch(AnotherException $e) { print "caught AnotherException\n"; $a->somethingElse(); } catch(MyException $e) { print "caught MyException\n"; } } catch(Exception $e) { print "caught Exception\n"; } I would expect this to output: throwing AnotherException caught AnotherException throwing MyException caught MyException But instead it outputs: throwing AnotherException caught AnotherException throwing MyException caught Exception Could anyone explain why it "skips over" catch(MyException $e) ? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to use traceit to report function input variables in stack trace

    - by reckoner
    Hi, I've been using the following code to trace the execution of my programs: import sys import linecache import random def traceit(frame, event, arg): if event == "line": lineno = frame.f_lineno filename = frame.f_globals["__file__"] if filename == "<stdin>": filename = "traceit.py" if (filename.endswith(".pyc") or filename.endswith(".pyo")): filename = filename[:-1] name = frame.f_globals["__name__"] line = linecache.getline(filename, lineno) print "%s:%s:%s: %s" % (name, lineno,frame.f_code.co_name , line.rstrip()) return traceit def main(): print "In main" for i in range(5): print i, random.randrange(0, 10) print "Done." sys.settrace(traceit) main() Using this code, or something like it, is it possible to report the values of certain function arguments? In other words, the above code tells me "which" functions were called and I would like to know "what" the corresponding values of the input variables for those function calls. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Exception handling in Iterable

    - by Maas
    Is there any way of handling -- and continuing from -- an exception in an iterator while maintaining the foreach syntactic sugar? I've got a parser that iterates over lines in a file, handing back a class-per-line. Occasionally lines will be syntactically bogus, but that doesn't necessarily mean that we shouldn't keep reading the file. My parser implements Iterable, but dealing with the potential exceptions means writing for (Iterator iter = myParser.iterator(); iter.hasNext(); ) { try { MyClass myClass = iter.next(); // .. do stuff .. } catch (Exception e) { // .. do exception stuff .. } } .. nothing wrong with that, but is there any way of getting exception handling on the implicit individual iter.next() calls in the foreach construct?

    Read the article

  • How to enable BDS2006's C++ WARN & TRACE macros.

    - by Psychic
    I am trying to find out how to enable (& use) Borland's WARN & TRACE macros. My starting point was this link: http://bcbjournal.org/articles/vol2/9809/Debugging_with_diagnostic_macros.htm?PHPSESSID=37bf58851bfeb5c199d1af31d7b2e7ff However, that appears to be for BCB5, and not the 2006 Borland Developer Studio. I've set the two defines (__WARN & __TRACE) I've included the .h file () I've added some macros, and everything compiles & links fine. But when I run the application (in DEBUG mode), no debug output file is created. What am I missing here?

    Read the article

  • Exception is swallowed by finally

    - by fiction
    static int retIntExc() throws Exception{ int result = 1; try { result = 2; throw new IOException("Exception rised."); } catch (ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException e) { System.out.println(e.getMessage()); result = 3; } finally { return result; } } A friend of mine is a .NET developer and currently migrating to Java and he ask me the following question about this source. In theory this must throw IOException("Exception rised.") and the whole method retIntExc() must throws Exception. But nothing happens, the method returns 2. I've not tested his example, but I think that this isn't the expected behavior. EDIT: Thanks for all answers. Some of you have ignored the fact that method is called retIntExc, which means that this is only some test/experimental example, showing problem in throwing/catching mechanics. I didn't need 'fix', I needed explanation why this happens.

    Read the article

  • Java, how to trace functions called

    - by user435657
    Hi all, I want to trace the beginning [& ending] of functions called in Java, like the following code: public void foo() { System.out.println("begin of foo()"); ... System.out.println("e-n-d of foo()"); } But maintaining of the dump code System.out.println is something tedious and error-prone, for there may be tens of thounds of function in an class. Any good idea can ease this work? I don't want dump statements all over the file. Implementation of both or one of the beginning & ending traces is perferd. But, if impossible, recordings of that the function has been called is also helpful. I mean not care the exact beginnig and ending, just tell that the function has been called.

    Read the article

  • Is the "message" of an exception culturally independent?

    - by Ray Hayes
    In an application I'm developing, I have the need to handle a socket-timeout differently from a general socket exception. The problem is that many different issues result in a SocketException and I need to know what the cause was. There is no inner exception reported, so the only information I have to work with is the message: "A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond" This question has a general and specific part: is it acceptable to write conditional logic based upon the textual representation of an exception? Is there a way to avoid needing exception handling? Example code below... try { IPEndPoint endPoint = null; client.Client.ReceiveTimeout = 1000; bytes = client.Receive(ref endPoint); } catch( SocketException se ) { if ( se.Message.Contains("did not properly respond after a period of time") ) { // Handle timeout differently.. } }

    Read the article

  • To get which function/line threw exception in javascript

    - by uzay95
    I am trying to create a Exception class to get and send errors from client to server. I want to catch exception in javascript function and push the details to the web service to write to database. But i couldn't get how to get which function/line throwed this exception. Is there any way to solve this?

    Read the article

  • Are there legitimate reasons for returning exception objects instead of throwing them?

    - by stakx
    This question is intended to apply to any OO programming language that supports exception handling; I am using C# for illustrative purposes only. Exceptions are usually intended to be raised when an problem arises that the code cannot immediately handle, and then to be caught in a catch clause in a different location (usually an outer stack frame). Q: Are there any legitimate situations where exceptions are not thrown and caught, but simply returned from a method and then passed around as error objects? This question came up for me because .NET 4's System.IObserver<T>.OnError method suggests just that: exceptions being passed around as error objects. Let's look at another scenario, validation. Let's say I am following conventional wisdom, and that I am therefore distinguishing between an error object type IValidationError and a separate exception type ValidationException that is used to report unexpected errors: partial interface IValidationError { } abstract partial class ValidationException : System.Exception { public abstract IValidationError[] ValidationErrors { get; } } (The System.Component.DataAnnotations namespace does something quite similar.) These types could be employed as follows: partial interface IFoo { } // an immutable type partial interface IFooBuilder // mutable counterpart to prepare instances of above type { bool IsValid(out IValidationError[] validationErrors); // true if no validation error occurs IFoo Build(); // throws ValidationException if !IsValid(…) } Now I am wondering, could I not simplify the above to this: partial class ValidationError : System.Exception { } // = IValidationError + ValidationException partial interface IFoo { } // (unchanged) partial interface IFooBuilder { bool IsValid(out ValidationError[] validationErrors); IFoo Build(); // may throw ValidationError or sth. like AggregateException<ValidationError> } Q: What are the advantages and disadvantages of these two differing approaches?

    Read the article

  • Web service creates stack overflow

    - by mouthpiec
    I have an application that when executed as a windows application works fine, but when converted to a web service, in some instances (which were tested successfully) by the windows app) creates a stack overflow. Do you have an idea of what can cause this? (Note that it works fine when the web service is placed on the localhost). Could it be that the stack size of a Web Service is smaller than that of a Window Application? UPDATE The below is the code in which I am getting a stack overflow error private bool CheckifPixelsNeighbour(Pixel c1, Pixel c2, int DistanceAllowed) { bool Neighbour = false; if ((Math.Abs(c1.X - c2.X) <= DistanceAllowed) && Math.Abs(c1.Y - c2.Y) <= DistanceAllowed) { Neighbour = true; } return Neighbour; }

    Read the article

  • How to create a typed stack using Objective-C

    - by Xetius
    I can create a stack class quite easily, using push and pop accessor methods to an NSArray, however. I can make this generic to take any NSObject derived class, however, I want to store only a specific class in this stack. Ideally I want to create something similar to Java's typed lists (List or List) so that I can only store that type in the stack. I can create a different class for each (ProjectStack or ItemStack), but this will lead to a more complicated file structure. Is there a way to do this to restrict the type of class I can add to a container to a specific, configurable type?

    Read the article

  • How can I reverse a stack?

    - by come pollinate me
    I need to write a VB.NET code to reverse the given characters using a stack. Input: 'S','T','A','C','K' So far I have input the letters, but I don't know how to get the console to reverse it. I'm a beginner to programming so please excuse my ignorance. An explanation as to how it's done would also be greatly appreciated. What I got so far. Module Module1 Sub Main() Dim StackObject As New Stack StackObject.Push("S") Console.WriteLine(StackObject.Peek) StackObject.Push("T") Console.WriteLine(StackObject.Peek) StackObject.Push("A") Console.WriteLine(StackObject.Peek) StackObject.Push("C") Console.WriteLine(StackObject.Peek) StackObject.Push("K") Console.WriteLine(StackObject.Peek) End Sub End Module I just need it to be reversed. I got it!! Module Module1 Sub Main() Dim StackObject As New Stack StackObject.Push("S") StackObject.Push("T") StackObject.Push("A") StackObject.Push("C") StackObject.Push("K") For Each cur As String In StackObject Console.WriteLine(cur) Next End Sub End Module That's how it's done.

    Read the article

  • Weird call stack when application has frozen

    - by Harriv
    I apparently have an dead lock problem in one of my applications and started investigating EurekaLog stack traces. Here's one recent: Call Stack Information: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |Address |Module |Unit |Class |Procedure/Method |Line | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |*Exception Thread: ID=14208; Priority=0; Class=; [Main] | |------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| |7C82860C|ntdll.dll | | |KiFastSystemCall | | |7C827D27|ntdll.dll | | |ZwWaitForSingleObject | | |77E61C96|kernel32.dll | | |WaitForSingleObjectEx | | |77E61C88|kernel32.dll | | |WaitForSingleObject | | |77E61C7B|kernel32.dll | | |WaitForSingleObject | | |004151C4|MyApp.exe |sysutils.pas |TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer|WaitForWriteSignal |16740[1] | |004151BC|MyApp.exe |sysutils.pas |TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer|WaitForWriteSignal |16740[1] | |0041522C|MyApp.exe |sysutils.pas |TMultiReadExclusiveWriteSynchronizer|BeginWrite |16818[57] | |004323FB|MyApp.exe |Classes.pas |TDataModule |Create |11357[1] | |004323C0|MyApp.exe |Classes.pas |TDataModule |Create |11356[0] | |007D744D|MyApp.exe |uRORemoteDataModule.pas |TRORemoteDataModule |Create |163[1] | |007D7434|MyApp.exe |uRORemoteDataModule.pas |TRORemoteDataModule |Create |162[0] | |007DBFAB|MyApp.exe |Sentrol_Impl.pas | |Create_Sentrol |85[1] | |00646952|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas |TROInvoker |CustomHandleMessage |726[11] | |00407BFA|MyApp.exe |system.pas |TInterfacedObject |_AddRef |17972[1] | |00404934|MyApp.exe |system.pas |TObject |GetInterface |9003[8] | |00407B1C|MyApp.exe |system.pas | |_IntfClear |17817[1] | |00404966|MyApp.exe |system.pas |TObject |GetInterface |9009[14] | |004048E8|MyApp.exe |system.pas |TObject |GetInterface |8995[0] | |00407BD7|MyApp.exe |system.pas |TInterfacedObject |QueryInterface |17964[1] | |77E61680|kernel32.dll | | |InterlockedDecrement | | |00407C10|MyApp.exe |system.pas |TInterfacedObject |_Release |17977[1] | |00407B2C|MyApp.exe |system.pas | |_IntfClear |17824[8] | |004067DF|MyApp.exe |system.pas | |_FinalizeArray |15233[100]| |00407B1C|MyApp.exe |system.pas | |_IntfClear |17817[1] | |00646577|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas |TROClassFactoryList |FindClassFactoryByInterfaceName|619[17] | |77E6166C|kernel32.dll | | |InterlockedIncrement | | |00407BFA|MyApp.exe |system.pas |TInterfacedObject |_AddRef |17972[1] | |00646B72|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas |TROInvoker |HandleMessage |758[1] | |006460C5|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas | |MainProcessMessage |512[98] | |00645BAC|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas | |MainProcessMessage |414[0] | |00647184|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas |TROMessageDispatcher |ProcessMessage |929[2] | |00647130|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas |TROMessageDispatcher |ProcessMessage |927[0] | |00647BCF|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas |TROServer |IntDispatchMessage |1328[27] | |00647ABC|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas |TROServer |IntDispatchMessage |1301[0] | |0064782F|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas |TROServer |DispatchMessage |1170[11] | |006477B4|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas |TROServer |DispatchMessage |1159[0] | |006477A9|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas |TROServer |DispatchMessage |1152[1] | |0064779C|MyApp.exe |uROServer.pas |TROServer |DispatchMessage |1151[0] | |00659CB6|MyApp.exe |uROLocalServer.pas |TROLocalServer |SendRequest |57[1] | |00659CA4|MyApp.exe |uROLocalServer.pas |TROLocalServer |SendRequest |56[0] | |0065A009|MyApp.exe |uROLocalChannel.pas |TROLocalChannel |IntDispatch |99[10] | |005EE540|MyApp.exe |uROClient.pas |TROTransportChannel |Dispatch |1884[36] | |005EE3FC|MyApp.exe |uROClient.pas |TROTransportChannel |Dispatch |1848[0] | |005EEC8F|MyApp.exe |uROClient.pas |TROTransportChannel |Dispatch |2134[27] | |00616EC8|MyApp.exe |PCCS_Intf.pas |TSentrol_Proxy |GetNewValues |6585[7] | |007CBDB9|MyApp.exe |ETAROConnectionForm.pas |TROConnectionForm |SyncSentrolUpdateTimerTimer |855[16] | |7C82ABE5|ntdll.dll | | |RtlTimeToTimeFields | | |004D5D9C|MyApp.exe |Controls.pas |TControl |WndProc |5063[0] | |004DA05B|MyApp.exe |Controls.pas |TWinControl |WndProc |7304[111] | |7C81A3AB|ntdll.dll | | |RtlLeaveCriticalSection | | |0042659C|MyApp.exe |Classes.pas |TThreadList |UnlockList |3359[1] | |00426598|MyApp.exe |Classes.pas |TThreadList |UnlockList |3359[1] | |004935BC|MyApp.exe |Graphics.pas | |FreeMemoryContexts |5060[12] | |00493524|MyApp.exe |Graphics.pas | |FreeMemoryContexts |5048[0] | |004D9799|MyApp.exe |Controls.pas |TWinControl |MainWndProc |7076[6] | |004329F4|MyApp.exe |Classes.pas | |StdWndProc |11583[8] | |7739C09A|USER32.dll | | |CallNextHookEx | | |004B1343|MyApp.exe |ExtCtrls.pas |TTimer |Timer |2281[1] | |00404A30|MyApp.exe |system.pas | |_CallDynaInst |9159[1] | |004B1227|MyApp.exe |ExtCtrls.pas |TTimer |WndProc |2239[4] | |004329F4|MyApp.exe |Classes.pas | |StdWndProc |11583[8] | |7739C42C|USER32.dll | | |GetParent | | |7739C45C|USER32.dll | | |GetParent | | |773A16E0|USER32.dll | | |DispatchMessageA | | |773A16D6|USER32.dll | | |DispatchMessageA | | |004CC234|MyApp.exe |Forms.pas |TApplication |ProcessMessage |8105[23] | |004CC138|MyApp.exe |Forms.pas |TApplication |ProcessMessage |8082[0] | |004CC26E|MyApp.exe |Forms.pas |TApplication |HandleMessage |8124[1] | |004CC264|MyApp.exe |Forms.pas |TApplication |HandleMessage |8123[0] | |004CC563|MyApp.exe |Forms.pas |TApplication |Run |8223[20] | |004CC4B0|MyApp.exe |Forms.pas |TApplication |Run |8203[0] | |007F18B3|MyApp.exe |MyApp.dpr | | |215[65] | The stack trace seems to be ok until first TTimer call, after that it contains some garbage(?), however the end contains the the lock which seems be holding the main thread. Can I trust this stack trace? If not, what can cause this and how I can avoid it? Any ideas about the dead lock based on this stack trace? I don't quite understand how creating a datamodule can dead lock.. I'm using Delphi 2007.

    Read the article

  • Creating my own Stack

    - by Malaken
    I am creating my own stack for my data structures class. For our assignment we are using the assignment to convert a real-time infix equation into a postfix equation. I thought my program: took input determines if it was digit or number(operand) prints it out determines if input is operator (+,-,/,*) adds to stack or prints out, depending on stack precedence Instead it prints out the operands as expect, but I get this error when I enter an operator .../dorun.sh line 33: 4136 Segmentation fault sh "$" [code] #include using namespace std; class DishWell{ public: char ReturnEnd(){ return Well.back(); } void Push(char x){ Well.push_back(x); } void Pop(){ Well.pop_back(); } bool IsEmpty(){ return Well.empty(); } private: vector<char> Well; }; #include <iostream> bool Precidence(char Input, char Stack){ int InputPrecidence,StackPrecidence; switch (Input){ case '*': InputPrecidence = 4; break; case '/': InputPrecidence = 4; break; case '+': InputPrecidence = 3; break; case '-': InputPrecidence = 3; break; case '(': InputPrecidence = 2; break; default: InputPrecidence = 0; } switch (Stack){ case '*': StackPrecidence = 4; break; case '/': StackPrecidence = 4; break; case '+': StackPrecidence = 3; break; case '-': StackPrecidence = 3; break; case '(': StackPrecidence = 2; break; default: StackPrecidence = 0; } if(InputPrecidence>StackPrecidence) return true; else return false; } int main(int argc, char** argv) { DishWell DishTray; char Input; bool InputFlag; InputFlag = true; while(InputFlag){ cin>>Input; if((((Input>='a'&&Input<='z')||(Input>='A'&&Input<='Z'))|| (Input>='0'&&Input<='9')))//If Digit or Number cout<<Input; if((Input=='*'||Input=='/'||Input=='+'||Input=='-')){//if operand if(Precidence(Input,DishTray.ReturnEnd())) DishTray.Push(Input); else if(!Precidence(Input,DishTray.ReturnEnd())) cout<<Input; } else if(!((((Input>='a'&&Input<='z')||(Input>='A'&&Input<='Z'))|| (Input>='0'&&Input<='9')))||((Input=='*'||Input=='/'||Input=='+'||Input=='-')))//if not digit/numer or operand InputFlag = false; } while(!DishTray.IsEmpty()){ cout<<DishTray.ReturnEnd(); DishTray.Pop(); } return 0; [code] My code is very length, I know, but I appreciate help. Especially any times for efficency or future coding. Thanks again P.S. Dr. Zemoudeh, this is your student Macaire

    Read the article

  • Autoconf/Automake "configure.ac:2: option `-Wall' not recognized"

    - by Atmocreations
    Hello I'm trying to start with autoconf / automake for a new project. To get started, I'm reading "Using GNU Autotools" and trying to build the Hello-World-Tutorial. The required files from page 96 (real Page=105 because it's a LaTeX-Presentation) configure.ac, Makefile.am and src/Makefile.am look exactly as stated in the document. After that I tried: $ autoreconf --install configure.ac:2: option `-Wall' not recognized autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 Well, it seems that automake doesn't like the second line: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Wall -Werror foreign]) Therefore I executed: $ autoreconf -v --install autoreconf: Entering directory `.' autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext autoreconf: running: aclocal autoreconf: configure.ac: tracing autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Libtool autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoheader autoreconf: running: automake --add-missing --copy --no-force configure.ac:2: option `-Wall' not recognized autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 You can see easily that autoconf runs automake --add-missing --copy --no-force which I repeated with the verbose-option. And it only returns this: $ automake -v --add-missing --copy --no-force automake: thread 0: reading autoconf --trace=_LT_AC_TAGCONFIG:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AM_ENABLE_MULTILIB:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AM_SILENT_RULES:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_INIT:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=_AM_COND_IF:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_CONFIG_FILES:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_CANONICAL_TARGET:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_CONFIG_LIBOBJ_DIR:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_FC_SRCEXT:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_CANONICAL_HOST:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AM_GNU_GETTEXT:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_LIBSOURCE:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_CANONICAL_BUILD:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AM_AUTOMAKE_VERSION:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=_AM_SUBST_NOTMAKE:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=sinclude:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AM_PROG_CC_C_O:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_CONFIG_LINKS:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_REQUIRE_AUX_FILE:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=m4_sinclude:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=LT_SUPPORTED_TAG:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AM_CONDITIONAL:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_CONFIG_HEADERS:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AM_MAINTAINER_MODE:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=m4_include:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=_AM_COND_ELSE:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AM_GNU_GETTEXT_INTL_SUBDIR:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=_AM_COND_ENDIF:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% --trace=AC_SUBST_TRACE:\$f:\$l::\$d::\$n::\${::}% configure.ac:2: option `-Wall' not recognized Anybody an idea why this doesn't work? My impression is that none of my files are wrong... I would like to use it for compiling C++ code for Linux and Windows (using mingw32-g++). Do you know any base where to start and what I have to pay attention for? I'm on Ubuntu 9.10 64bit. Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance, regards

    Read the article

  • Default .NET exception handler

    - by ajs410
    So the other day my C# application crashed. Usually, with a .NET application, if you have an unhandled exception you get a nice error message with a stack trace. However, this time, I got a different dialog that just told me there was an error and offered to attach a Debugger, but there was no stack trace in the dialog and the machine it was running on had no debugger installed. What gives? Why don't I see the default .NET exception handler?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >