jon erickson - Page 10 - Developer IT

How do I recover from an unchecked exception?

- by erickson

Unchecked exceptions are alright if you want to handle every failure the same way, for example by logging it and skipping to the next request, displaying a message to the user and handling the next event, etc. If this is my use case, all I have to do is catch some general exception type at a high level in my system, and handle everything the same way. But I want to recover from specific problems, and I'm not sure the best way to approach it with unchecked exceptions. Here is a concrete example. Suppose I have a web application, built using Struts2 and Hibernate. If an exception bubbles up to my "action", I log it, and display a pretty apology to the user. But one of the functions of my web application is creating new user accounts, that require a unique user name. If a user picks a name that already exists, Hibernate throws an org.hibernate.exception.ConstraintViolationException (an unchecked exception) down in the guts of my system. I'd really like to recover from this particular problem by asking the user to choose another user name, rather than giving them the same "we logged your problem but for now you're hosed" message. Here are a few points to consider: There a lot of people creating accounts simultaneously. I don't want to lock the whole user table between a "SELECT" to see if the name exists and an "INSERT" if it doesn't. In the case of relational databases, there might be some tricks to work around this, but what I'm really interested in is the general case where pre-checking for an exception won't work because of a fundamental race condition. Same thing could apply to looking for a file on the file system, etc. Given my CTO's propensity for drive-by management induced by reading technology columns in "Inc.", I need a layer of indirection around the persistence mechanism so that I can throw out Hibernate and use Kodo, or whatever, without changing anything except the lowest layer of persistence code. As a matter of fact, there are several such layers of abstraction in my system. How can I prevent them from leaking in spite of unchecked exceptions? One of the declaimed weaknesses of checked exceptions is having to "handle" them in every call on the stack—either by declaring that a calling method throws them, or by catching them and handling them. Handling them often means wrapping them in another checked exception of a type appropriate to the level of abstraction. So, for example, in checked-exception land, a file-system–based implementation of my UserRegistry might catch IOException, while a database implementation would catch SQLException, but both would throw a UserNotFoundException that hides the underlying implementation. How do I take advantage of unchecked exceptions, sparing myself of the burden of this wrapping at each layer, without leaking implementation details?

Search Results

Search found 1070 results on 43 pages for 'jon erickson'.

Page 10/43 | < Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 | Next Page >

- by erickson

- by Kris Erickson

- by Jon Erickson

- by Kris Erickson

- by Kris Erickson

- by Jon Erickson

- by Kris Erickson

- by Jon

- by jon

- by ScottGu

- by Ben Griswold

- by mbcrump

- by Jon Hanson

- by Jon Rhoades

- by Jon

- by Jon Topper

- by Jon Schneider

- by Jon

- by jon

- by Barry-Jon

- by Jon-Eric

- by Jon

- by Jon Rhoades

- by Jon Seigel

- by Jon Rhoades

< Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 | Next Page >