Search Results

Search found 968 results on 39 pages for 'lambda'.

Page 10/39 | < Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >

• Adding LambaExpression to an instance of IQueryable

  - by Paul Knopf

  ParameterExpression parameter = Expression.Parameter(typeof(Product), "x"); MemberExpression Left = Expression.MakeMemberAccess(parameter, typeof(Product).GetProperty("Name")); ConstantExpression Right = Expression.Constant(value, typeof(String)); BinaryExpression expression = Expression.Equal(Left, Right); LambdaExpression lambada = Expression.Lambda<Func<Product, bool>>(expression, parameter); Now how do I add this lambada to an instance of an IQuerybale, lets say _query _query.Where(lambada.Compile());?

  Read the article

• passing Func<TSource, TKey> keySelector error

  - by user338429

  static void Main() { string[] a = { "a", "asd", "bdfsd", "we" }; a = a.OrderBy(fun).ToArray(); } private static int fun(string s) { return s.Length; } its is giving compile time error . I know that we can do this with Lambda expression like this. a.OrderBy(s=>s.Length).ToArray(); but i want to this do by defining different function . What mistake i have done?

  Read the article

• Cannot convert lambda expression to type 'string' because it is not a delegate type

  - by RememberME

  I have the following code written by another developer on 2 pages of my site. This used to work just fine, but now is giving the error "Cannot convert lambda expression to type 'string' because it is not a delegate type" on the Delete line with Ajax.ThemeRollerActionLink. I don't go into this section of the site often, and we recently upgraded from MVC 1.0 to 2.0. I'm guessing that's probably when it stopped working. I've looked up this error and the recommended fix seems to be add using System.Linq However, the page already has <%@ Import Namespace="System.Linq" %> <% Html.Grid(Model).Columns(col => { col.For(c => "<a href='" + Url.Action("Edit", new { userName = c }) + "' class=\"fg-button fg-button-icon-solo ui-state-default ui-corner-all\"><span class=\"ui-icon ui-icon-pencil\"></span></a>").Named("Edit").DoNotEncode(); col.For(c => Ajax.ThemeRollerActionLink("fg-button fg-button-icon-solo ui-state-default ui-corner-all", "ui-icon ui-icon-close", "Delete", new { userName = c }, new AjaxOptions { Confirm = "Delete User?", HttpMethod = "Delete", InsertionMode = InsertionMode.Replace, UpdateTargetId = "gridcontainer", OnSuccess = "successDeleteAssignment", OnFailure = "failureDeleteAssignment" })).Named("Delete").DoNotEncode(); col.For(c => c).Named("User"); }).Attributes(id => "userlist").Render(); %>

  Read the article

• DropDownListFor and relating my lambda to my ViewModel

  - by Daniel Harvey

  After googling for a while I'm still drawing a blank here. I'm trying to use a ViewModel to pull and provide a dictionary to a drop down list inside a strongly typed View: <%@ Page Title="" Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/Site.Master" Inherits="Notebook.ViewModels.CorporationJoinViewModel" %> ... <%: Html.DropDownListFor(c => c.CorpDictionary.Keys, new SelectList(Model.CorpDictionary, "Value", "Key"))%> I'm getting the error CS1061: 'object' does not contain a definition for 'CorpDictionary' and no extension method 'CorpDictionary' accepting a first argument of type 'object' could be found and the relevant bit of my ViewModel public class CorporationJoinViewModel { DB _db = new DB(); // data context public Dictionary<int, string> CorpDictionary { get { Dictionary<int, string> corporations = new Dictionary<int, string>(); int x = 0; foreach (Corporation corp in _db.Corporations) { corporations.Add(x, corp.name); } return corporations; } } I'll admit i have a pretty magical understanding of how linq is finding my ViewModel object from that lambda, and the error message is making me think it's not. Is my problem the method I'm using to pass the data? What am I missing here?

  Read the article

• Is is possible to populate a datatable using a Lambda expression(C#3.0)

  - by deepak.kumar.goyal

  I have a datatable. I am populating some values into that. e.g. DataTable dt =new DataTable(); dt.Columns.Add("Col1",typeof(int)); dt.Columns.Add("Col2",typeof(string)); dt.Columns.Add("Col3",typeof(DateTime)); dt.Columns.Add("Col4",typeof(bool)); for(int i=0;i< 10;i++) dt.Rows.Add(i,"String" + i.toString(),DateTime.Now,(i%2 == 0)?true:false); There is nothing wrong in this program and gives me the expected output. However, recently , I am learning Lambda and has done some basic knowledge. With that I was trying to do the same thing as under Enumerable.Range(0,9).Select(i = > { dt.Rows.Add(i,"String" + i.toString(),DateTime.Now,(i%2 == 0)?true:false); }); But I am unsuccessful. Is my approach correct(Yes I know that I am getting compile time error; since not enough knowledge on the subject so far)? Can we achieve this by the way I am doing is a big doubt(as I donot know.. just giving a shot). If so , can some one please help me in this regard. I am using C#3.0 and dotnet framework 3.5 Thanks

  Read the article

• Using array of Action() in a lambda expression

  - by Sean87

  I want to do some performance measurement for a method that does some work with int arrays, so I wrote the following class: public class TimeKeeper { public TimeSpan Measure(Action[] actions) { var watch = new Stopwatch(); watch.Start(); foreach (var action in actions) { action(); } return watch.Elapsed; } } But I can not call the Measure mehotd for the example below: var elpased = new TimeKeeper(); elpased.Measure( () => new Action[] { FillArray(ref a, "a", 10000), FillArray(ref a, "a", 10000), FillArray(ref a, "a", 10000) }); I get the following errors: Cannot convert lambda expression to type 'System.Action[]' because it is not a delegate type Cannot implicitly convert type 'void' to 'System.Action' Cannot implicitly convert type 'void' to 'System.Action' Cannot implicitly convert type 'void' to 'System.Action' Here is the method that works with arrays: private void FillArray(ref int[] array, string name, int count) { array = new int[count]; for (int i = 0; i < array.Length; i++) { array[i] = i; } Console.WriteLine("Array {0} is now filled up with {1} values", name, count); } What I am doing wrong?

  Read the article

• c# Find value in a range using lambda

  - by n4rzul

  I'm trying to find an item in a list of values based on another value using a lambda expression using the Find method. In this example I'm expecting to get back -1000, but for the life of me, I just can't come up with the proper lamda expression. If that sounds confusing I hope the code and comments below explain it better. TIA. using System; using System.Collections.Generic; namespace TestingStuff { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { double amount = -200; //The Range of values List<MyValue> values = new List<MyValue>(); values.Add(new MyValue(-1000)); values.Add(new MyValue(-100)); values.Add(new MyValue(-10)); values.Add(new MyValue(0)); values.Add(new MyValue(100)); values.Add(new MyValue(1000)); //Find it!!! MyValue fVal = values.Find(x => (x.Value > amount) && (x.Value < amount)); //Expecting -1000 as a result here since -200 falls between -1000 and -100 //if it were -90 I'd expect -100 since it falls between -100 and 0 if (fVal != null) Console.WriteLine(fVal.Value); Console.ReadKey(); } } public class MyValue { public double Value { get; set; } public MyValue(double value) { Value = value; } } }

  Read the article

• Mocking objects with complex Lambda Expressions as parameters

  - by iCe

  Hi there, I´m encountering this problem trying to mock some objects that receive complex lambda expressions in my projects. Mostly with with proxy objects that receive this type of delegate: Func<Tobj, Fun<TParam1, TParam2, TResult>> I have tried to use Moq as well as RhinoMocks to acomplish mocking those types of objects, however both fail. (Moq fails with NotSupportedException, and in RhinoMocks simpy does not satisgy expectation). This is simplified example of what I´m trying to do: I have a Calculator object that does calculations: public class Calculator { public Calculator() { } public int Add(int x, int y) { var result = x + y; return result; } public int Substract(int x, int y) { var result = x - y; return result; } } I need to validate parameters on every method in the Calculator class, so to keep with the Single Responsability principle, I create a validator class. I wire everything up using a Proxy class, that prevents having duplicate code: public class CalculatorProxy : CalculatorExample.ICalculatorProxy { private ILimitsValidator _validator; public CalculatorProxy(Calculator _calc, ILimitsValidator _validator) { this.Calculator = _calc; this._validator = _validator; } public int Operation(Func&lt;Calculator, Func&lt;int, int, int&gt;&gt; operation, int x, int y) { _validator.ValidateArgs(x, y); var calcMethod = operation(this.Calculator); var result = calcMethod(x, y); _validator.ValidateResult(result); return result; } public Calculator Calculator { get; private set; } } Now, I´m testing a component that does use the CalculatorProxy, so I want to mock it, for example using Rhino Mocks: [TestMethod] public void ParserWorksWithCalcultaroProxy() { var calculatorProxyMock = MockRepository.GenerateMock&lt;ICalculatorProxy&gt;(); calculatorProxyMock.Expect(x =&gt; x.Calculator).Return(_calculator); calculatorProxyMock.Expect(x =&gt; x.Operation(c =&gt; c.Add, 2, 2)).Return(4); var mathParser = new MathParser(calculatorProxyMock); mathParser.ProcessExpression("2 + 2"); calculatorProxyMock.VerifyAllExpectations(); } However I cannot get it to work! Any ideas about how this can be done? Thanks a lot!

  Read the article

• Reading column header and column values of a data table using LAMBDA(C#3.0)

  - by Newbie

  Consider the folowing where I am reading the data table values and writing to a text file using (StreamWriter sw = new StreamWriter(@"C:\testwrite.txt",true)) { DataPreparation().AsEnumerable().ToList().ForEach(i => { string col1 = i[0].ToString(); string col2 = i[1].ToString(); string col3 = i[2].ToString(); string col4 = i[3].ToString(); sw.WriteLine( col1 + "\t" + col2 + "\t" + col3 + "\t" + col4 + Environment.NewLine ); }); } The data preparation function is as under private static DataTable DataPreparation() { DataTable dt = new DataTable(); dt.Columns.Add("Col1", typeof(string)); dt.Columns.Add("Col2", typeof(int)); dt.Columns.Add("Col3", typeof(DateTime)); dt.Columns.Add("Col4", typeof(bool)); for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { dt.Rows.Add("String" + i.ToString(), i, DateTime.Now.Date, (i % 2 == 0) ? true : false); } return dt; } It is working fine. Now in the above described program, it is known to me the Number of columns and the column headers. How to achieve the same in case when the column headers and number of columns are not known at compile time using the lambda expression? I have already done that which is as under public static void WriteToTxt(string directory, string FileName, DataTable outData, string delimiter) { FileStream fs = null; StreamWriter streamWriter = null; using (fs = new FileStream(directory + "\\" + FileName + ".txt", FileMode.Append, FileAccess.Write)) { try { streamWriter = new StreamWriter(fs); streamWriter.BaseStream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.End); streamWriter.WriteLine(); DataTableReader datatableReader = outData.CreateDataReader(); for (int header = 0; header < datatableReader.FieldCount; header++) { streamWriter.Write(outData.Columns[header].ToString() + delimiter); } streamWriter.WriteLine(); int row = 0; while (datatableReader.Read()) { for (int field = 0; field < datatableReader.FieldCount; field++) { streamWriter.Write(outData.Rows[row][field].ToString() + delimiter); } streamWriter.WriteLine(); row++; } } catch (Exception ex) { throw ex; } } } I am using C#3.0 and framework 3.5 Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• Linq-to-SQL: Ignore null parameters from WHERE clause

  - by Peter Bridger

  The query below should return records that either have a matching Id supplied in ownerGroupIds or that match ownerUserId. However is ownerUserId is null, I want this part of the query to be ignored. public static int NumberUnderReview(int? ownerUserId, List<int> ownerGroupIds) { return ( from c in db.Contacts where c.Active == true && c.LastReviewedOn <= DateTime.Now.AddDays(-365) && ( // Owned by user !ownerUserId.HasValue || c.OwnerUserId.Value == ownerUserId.Value ) && ( // Owned by group ownerGroupIds.Count == 0 || ownerGroupIds.Contains( c.OwnerGroupId.Value ) ) select c ).Count(); } However when a null is passed in for ownerUserId then I get the following error: Nullable object must have a value. I get a tingling I may have to use a lambda expression in this instance?

  Read the article

• Func<sometype,bool> to Func<T,bool>

  - by user175528

  If i have: public static Func<SomeType, bool> GetQuery() { return a => a.Foo=="Bar"; } and a generic version public static Func<T, bool> GetQuery<T>() { return (Func<T,bool>)GetQuery(); } how can I do the case? The only way I have found so far is to try and combine it with a mock function: Func<T, bool> q=a => true; return (Func<T, bool>)Delegate.Combine(GetQuery(), q); I know how to do that with Expression.Lambda, but I need to work with plain functions, not expression trees

  Read the article

• LINQ To SQL Wildcards

  - by mcass20

  How can I build in wildcards to my LINQ To SQL lambda expression? This is what I have currently: var query = from log in context.Logs select log; foreach (string filter in CustomReport.ExtColsToFilter) { string tempFilter = filter; query = query.Where(Log => Log.FormattedMessage.Contains(tempFilter)); } This works fine up until I try and pass wildcards in the filter string. I'm experimenting with SqlMethods.Like() but to no avail. The filters above look like this: "<key>NID</key><value>mcass</value>". I'd like to be able to pass filters like this: "<key>NID</key><value>%m%</value>"

  Read the article

• linq expression in vb.net

  - by Thurein

  Hi, Can any body translate the following c# code to vb. I have tried telarik code converter but I got problem at expression.call and it won't compile at all. private static IOrderedQueryable<T> OrderingHelper<T>(IQueryable<T> source, string propertyName, bool descending, bool anotherLevel) { ParameterExpression param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), string.Empty); MemberExpression property = Expression.PropertyOrField(param, propertyName); LambdaExpression sort = Expression.Lambda(property, param); MethodCallExpression call = Expression.Call( typeof(Queryable), (!anotherLevel ? "OrderBy" : "ThenBy") + (descending ? "Descending" : string.Empty), new[] { typeof(T), property.Type }, // error line source.Expression, Expression.Quote(sort)); return (IOrderedQueryable<T>)source.Provider.CreateQuery<T>(call); } thanks Thurein

  Read the article

• Using Reflection Invoke static generic method passing a Lamba as parameter

  - by Nikos Baxevanis

  Is it possible to write the following code via Reflection? var fake = A.Fake<Foo>( o => o.WithArgumentsForConstructor(new[] { "Hello" })); Where o is: Action<IFakeOptionsBuilder<T>> Where WithArgumentsForConstructor is: IFakeOptionsBuilder<T> WithArgumentsForConstructor(IEnumerable<object> argumentsForConstructor); The Foo class is: class Foo { public Foo(string s) { } } What I did was: object fake = typeof(A) .GetMethod("Fake", new Type[] { }) .MakeGenericMethod(new[] { this.targetType }) .Invoke(null, /* Here I need to pass the lambda. */);

  Read the article

• How to replace for-loops with a functional statement in C#?

  - by Lernkurve

  A colleague once said that God is killing a kitten every time I write a for-loop. When asked how to avoid for-loops, his answer was to use a functional language. However, if you are stuck with a non-functional language, say C#, what techniques are there to avoid for-loops or to get rid of them by refactoring? With lambda expressions and LINQ perhaps? If so, how? Questions So the question boils down to: Why are for-loops bad? Or, in what context are for-loops to avoid and why? Can you provide C# code examples of how it looks before, i.e. with a loop, and afterwards without a loop?

  Read the article

• VB to C# conversion incongruency with lambdas

  - by Jason

  I have a bit of code that I have been tasked with converting to C# from VB. A snippet of mine seems like it cannot be converted from one to the other, and if so, I just don't know how to do it and am getting a little frustrated. Here's some background: OrderForm is an abstract class, inherited by Invoice (and also PurchaseOrder). The following VB snippet works correctly: Dim Invs As List(Of OrderForm) = GetForms(theOrder.OrderID) .... Dim inv As Invoice = Invs.Find( Function(someInv As Invoice) thePO.SubPONumber = someInv.SubInvoiceNumber) In C#, the best I came to converting this is: List<OrderForm> Invs = GetForms(theOrder.OrderID); .... Invoice inv = Invs.Find( (Invoice someInv) => thePO.SubPONumber == someInv.SubInvoiceNumber); However, I get the following error when I do this: Cannot convert lambda expression to delegate type 'System.Predicate' because the parameter types do not match the delegate parameter types Is there any way to fix this without restructuring my whole codebase?

  Read the article

• Help with python list-comprehension

  - by leChuck

  A simplified version of my problem: I have a list comprehension that i use to set bitflags on a two dimensional list so: s = FLAG1 | FLAG2 | FLAG3 [[c.set_state(s) for c in row] for row in self.__map] All set_state does is: self.state |= f This works fine but I have to have this function "set_state" in every cell in __map. Every cell in __map has a .state so what I'm trying to do is something like: [[c.state |= s for c in row] for row in self.map] or map(lambda c: c.state |= s, [c for c in row for row in self.__map]) Except that neither works (Syntax error). Perhaps I'm barking up the wrong tree with map/lamda but I would like to get rid on set_state. And perhaps know why assignment does not work in the list-comprehension

  Read the article

• How can I check the type of an object against a list of types?

  - by RookieRick

  Given a collection IEnumerable<Type> supportedTypes What's the best way to check whether a given object is one of those types (or a derived type)? My first instinct was to do something like: // object target is a parameter passed to the method in which I'm doing this. if (supportedTypes.Count( supportedType => target is supportedType ) > 0) { // Yay my object is of a supported type!!! } ..but that doesn't seem to be working. Can I not use the "is" keyword in a lambda expression like this?

  Read the article

• Linq to SQL - How to compare against a collection in the where clause?

  - by Sgraffite

  I'd like to compare against an IEnumerable collection in my where clause. Do I need to manually loop through the collection to pull out the column I want to compare against, or is there a generic way to handle this? I want something like this: public IEnumerable<Cookie> GetCookiesForUsers(IEnumerable<User> Users) { var cookies = from c in db.Cookies join uc in db.UserCookies on c.CookieID equals uc.CookieID join u in db.Users on uc.UserID equals u.UserID where u.UserID.Equals(Users.UserID) select c; return cookies.ToList(); } I'm used to using the lambda Linq to SQL syntax, but I decided to try the SQLesque syntax since I was using joins this time. What is a good way to do this?

  Read the article

• Setting a property from one collection to another collection

  - by ooo

  I have two colluections List<Application> myApps; List<Application> yourApps; These lists have overlapping overlapping data but they are coming from different sources and each source has some missing field data. Application object has a property called Description Both collections have a unique field called Key i want to see if there is a LINQ solution to: Loop through all applications in myApps and look at the key and see if that existing in yourApps. If it does, i want to take the description property from that application in yourApps and set the description property on the application on myApps to that same value i wanted to see if there was any slick way using lambda expressions (instead of having to have loops and a number of if statements.)

  Read the article

• When is LINQ (to objects) Overused?

  - by Mystagogue

  My career started as a hard-core functional-paradigm developer (LISP), and now I'm a hard-care .net/C# developer. Of course I'm enamored with LINQ. However, I also believe in (1) using the right tool for the job and (2) preserving the KISS principle: of the 60+ engineers I work with, perhaps only 20% have hours of LINQ / functional paradigm experience, and 5% have 6 to 12 months of such experience. In short, I feel compelled to stay away from LINQ unless I'm hampered in achieving a goal without it (wherein replacing 3 lines of O-O code with one line of LINQ is not a "goal"). But now one of the engineers, having 12 months LINQ / functional-paradigm experience, is using LINQ to objects, or at least lambda expressions anyway, in every conceivable location in production code. My various appeals to the KISS principle have not yielded any results. Therefore... What published studies can I next appeal to? What "coding standard" guideline have others concocted with some success? Are there published LINQ performance issues I could point out? In short, I'm trying to achieve my first goal - KISS - by indirect persuasion. Of course this problem could be extended to countless other areas (such as overuse of extension methods). Perhaps there is an "uber" guide, highly regarded (e.g. published studies, etc), that takes a broader swing at this. Anything?

  Read the article

• Lambdas within Extension methods: Possible memory leak?

  - by Oliver

  I just gave an answer to a quite simple question by using an extension method. But after writing it down i remembered that you can't unsubscribe a lambda from an event handler. So far no big problem. But how does all this behave within an extension method?? Below is my code snipped again. So can anyone enlighten me, if this will lead to myriads of timers hanging around in memory if you call this extension method multiple times? I would say no, cause the scope of the timer is limited within this function. So after leaving it no one else has a reference to this object. I'm just a little unsure, cause we're here within a static function in a static class. public static class LabelExtensions { public static Label BlinkText(this Label label, int duration) { Timer timer = new Timer(); timer.Interval = duration; timer.Tick += (sender, e) => { timer.Stop(); label.Font = new Font(label.Font, label.Font.Style ^ FontStyle.Bold); }; label.Font = new Font(label.Font, label.Font.Style | FontStyle.Bold); timer.Start(); return label; } }

  Read the article

• Delegate within a delegate in VB.NET.

  - by Topdown

  I am trying to write a VB.NET alternative to a C# anonymous function. I wish to call Threading.SynchronizationContext.Current.Send which expects a delegate of type Threading.SendOrPostCallback to be passed to it. The background is here, but because I wish to both pass in a string to MessageBox.Show and also capture the DialogResult I need to define another delegate within. I am struggling with the VB.NET syntax, both from the traditional delegate style, and lambda functions. My go at the traditional syntax is below, but I have gut feeling it should be much simpler than this: Private Sub CollectMesssageBoxResultFromUserAsDelegate(ByVal messageToShow As String, ByRef wasCanceled As Boolean) wasCanceled = False If Windows.Forms.MessageBox.Show(String.Format("{0}{1}Please press [OK] to ignore this error and continue, or [Cancel] to stop here.", messageToShow), "Continue", Windows.Forms.MessageBoxButtons.OKCancel, Windows.Forms.MessageBoxIcon.Exclamation) = Windows.Forms.DialogResult.Cancel Then wasCanceled = True End If End Sub Private Delegate Sub ShowMessageBox(ByVal messageToShow As String, ByRef canceled As Boolean) Private Sub AskUserWhetherToCancel(ByVal message As String, ByVal args As CancelEventArgs) If args Is Nothing Then args = New System.ComponentModel.CancelEventArgs With {.Cancel = False} Dim wasCancelClicked As Boolean Dim firstDelegate As New ShowMessageBox(AddressOf CollectMesssageBoxResultFromUserAsDelegate) '…. Now what?? 'I can’t declare SendOrPostCallback as below: 'Dim myDelegate As New Threading.SendOrPostCallback(AddressOf firstDelegate) End Sub

  Read the article

• linq-to-sql combine child expressions

  - by VictorS

  I need to create and combine several expressions for child entity into one to use it on "Any" operator of a parent. Code now looks like this: Expresion<Child, bool> startDateExpression = t => t.start_date >= startDate; Expression<Child, bool> endDateExpression = t => t.end_date <= endDate; .... ParameterExpression param = startDateExpression.Parameters[0]; Expression<Func<T, bool>> Combined = Expression.Lambda<Func<Child, bool>>( Expression.AndAlso(startDateExpression.Body, startDateExpression.Body), param); //but now I am trying to use combined expression on parent //this line fails just to give an idea on what I am trying to do: //filter type is IQueryable<Parent>; var filter = filter.Where(p =>p.Children.Any(Combined)); How can I do that? Is there better(more elegant way way of doing it?

  Read the article

• How can I get this dynamic WHERE statement in my LINQ-to-XML to work?

  - by Edward Tanguay

  In this question Jon Skeet offered a very interesting solution to making a LINQ-to-XML statement dynamic, but my knowledge of lambdas and delegates is not yet advanced enough to implement it: I've got it this far, but of course I get the error "smartForm does not exist in the current context": private void LoadWithId(int id) { XDocument xmlDoc = null; try { xmlDoc = XDocument.Load(FullXmlDataStorePathAndFileName); } catch (Exception ex) { throw new Exception(String.Format("Cannot load XML file: {0}", ex.Message)); } Func<XElement, bool> whereClause = (int)smartForm.Element("id") == id"; var smartForms = xmlDoc.Descendants("smartForm") .Where(whereClause) .Select(smartForm => new SmartForm { Id = (int)smartForm.Element("id"), WhenCreated = (DateTime)smartForm.Element("whenCreated"), ItemOwner = smartForm.Element("itemOwner").Value, PublishStatus = smartForm.Element("publishStatus").Value, CorrectionOfId = (int)smartForm.Element("correctionOfId"), IdCode = smartForm.Element("idCode").Value, Title = smartForm.Element("title").Value, Description = smartForm.Element("description").Value, LabelWidth = (int)smartForm.Element("labelWidth") }); foreach (SmartForm smartForm in smartForms) { _collection.Add(smartForm); } } Ideally I want to be able to just say: var smartForms = GetSmartForms(smartForm=> (int) smartForm.Element("DisplayOrder").Value > 50); I've got it this far, but I'm just not grokking the lambda magic, how do I do this? public List<SmartForm> GetSmartForms(XDocument xmlDoc, XElement whereClause) { var smartForms = xmlDoc.Descendants("smartForm") .Where(whereClause) .Select(smartForm => new SmartForm { Id = (int)smartForm.Element("id"), WhenCreated = (DateTime)smartForm.Element("whenCreated"), ItemOwner = smartForm.Element("itemOwner").Value, PublishStatus = smartForm.Element("publishStatus").Value, CorrectionOfId = (int)smartForm.Element("correctionOfId"), IdCode = smartForm.Element("idCode").Value, Title = smartForm.Element("title").Value, Description = smartForm.Element("description").Value, LabelWidth = (int)smartForm.Element("labelWidth") }); }

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >