Search Results

Search found 28991 results on 1160 pages for 'gestion de la relation client (crm)'.

Page 103/1160 | < Previous Page | 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110  | Next Page >

  • Xamarin 3 disponible en téléchargement, permet la construction d'UIs natives iOS, Android et Windows depuis une seule base de code commune en C#

    Xamarin 3 disponible en téléchargement, permet la construction d'UIs natives iOS, Android et Windows depuis une seule base de code commune en C# La troisième mouture de l'environnement de développement mobile multiplateformes Xamarin est désormais disponible. Parmi les nouveautés qui accompagnent cette version figure l'arrivée de Xamarin Designer pour iOS, un puissant outil de conception visuel pour la plateforme iOS qui permettra aux développeurs de mettre rapidement sur pied des interfaces...

    Read the article

  • « Entity Framework : structurez et optimisez votre couche d'accès aux données », invitation à la conférence gratuite de Microsoft du 18 mars

    Entity Framework : structurez et optimisez votre couche d'accès aux données Assistez gratuitement aux après-midi du développement de Microsoft Les après-midi du développement sont des conférences gratuites organisées par Microsoft qui permettent aux développeurs de découvrir de nouvelles problématiques. L'occasion de monter en compétence et d'échanger avec des experts sur un sujet précis. La première conférence de 2011 se tiendra le 18 mars entre 14h et 18h sur le campus de Microsoft France. Elle permettra de découvrir la technologie d'accès aux données introduite par le Framework .NET 3.5 SP1 : Entity Framework. Au cours de cette session, l'utilisation d'Entity Framework dans les scénar...

    Read the article

  • RIM : une « taupe » dénonce les outils de développement du BlackBerry et affirme que rien ne va plus dans la société, RIM dément

    RIM : une « taupe » dénonce les outils de développement du BlackBerry Et affirme que rien ne va plus dans la société, le management dément RIM traverse une zone de turbulence de plus en plus agitée. Après l'annonce de profits en chute et de licenciements, une personne se réclamant « cadre supérieur » chez le constructeur canadien du BlackBerry a décidé de publier une lettre ouverte. Adressée au « top management », il y fait part de ses doutes et de ses propositions pour relancer la société. L'auteur explique sa démarche anonyme par le fait que le dialogue et la critique ne seraient pas dans la culture d'entr...

    Read the article

  • La Preview du SDK de Windows Phone 8 disponible le 12 septembre, mais pas pour tout le monde

    La Preview du SDK de Windows Phone 8 disponible le 12 septembre mais pas pour tout le monde Parallèlement à la présentation des nouveaux terminaux Windows Phone 8 de Nokia, Microsoft a annoncé la date de sortie d'une préversion (quasi-finale) du Kit de développement pour l'OS mobile. Le SDK Windows Phone 8 pourra être téléchargé à partir du 12 septembre prochain, mais seulement pour un groupe restreint de développeurs, selon le billet de blog de Microsoft. Il semblerait que l'outil soit uniquement accessible aux personnes ayant déjà publié une application sur le MarketPlace Windows Phone. Ce choix de Micro...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft rejette le standard WebGL jugé "dangereux" suite à la découverte de multiples failles critiques sur Firefox

    Microsoft rejette le standard WebGL jugé « dangereux » Suite à la découverte de multiples failles critiques sur Firefox L'avenir du standard WebGL sur Internet Explorer s'annonce très incertain. Microsoft rejette ce standard d'affichage 3D pour le Web, au moins dans sa forme actuelle qu'il juge « dangereuse » dans une dépêche faisant suite à la découverte de plusieurs nouvelles failles critiques sur l'implémentation de Mozilla Firefox. Des failles qui pourraient être présentes sur Google Chrome également. Sur le blog de recherche en sécurité et défense, l'équipe MSRC de Redmond affirme que « le support de WebGL dans les navigateurs ...

    Read the article

  • Surface Pro sera commercialisée entre 899$ et 999$, la tablette x86 de Microsoft officiellement disponible en janvier 2013

    Microsoft dévoile Surface deux modèles de tablettes Windows 8 ARM et Intel Microsoft a ouvert le bal des dispositifs sous Windows 8, et annoncé officiellement le lancement de deux tablettes sous le système d'exploitation. L'OS entièrement repensé, avec une nouvelle interface utilisateur, un support des architectures ARM et plusieurs autres nouveautés est l'occasion pour l'éditeur de se lancer pour la première fois dans la construction de ses propres dispositifs sous Windows. Baptisés Microsoft Surface, les deux modèles de tablettes sur deux puces différentes (ARM et X86) se positionnent comme de sérieux concurrents à l'iPad d'Apple qui domine largement le marché actuellement.

    Read the article

  • Les quatre tendances qui vont changer la Business Intelligence dans les trois ans à venir, selon Gartner

    Les 4 tendances qui changeront (peut-être) la BI Dans les trois ans à venir, selon Gartner Dans le cadre de ses Prédiction 2011, le cabinet Gartner a identifié quatre grandes évolutions qui devraient impacter le domaine de la Business Intelligence. Ces prévisions restent hypothétiques mais elle s'appuie tout de même sur des tendances lourdes observables. Les voici en résumé : 1 - En 2013, 33% des fonctions de BI seront consommées au travers d'appareils mobiles Le taux d'adoption et la grande disponibilité des appareils nomades, ajoutée aux efforts des éditeurs de BI (développement de nouveaux produits et marketing) devraient rapidement générer ...

    Read the article

  • Comment transformer son smartphone en microscope ? La procédure ne demande que 20 minutes et 10 dollars

    Peut on tout faire avec nos SmartPhones ? Voici une démonstration qui permet de transformer un iPhone (mais cela peut être fait avec n'importe quel SmartPhone)) en un microscope d'une capacité de grossissement de 175x, pour simplement 10$ et 20 minutes de travail. Ce qui comparé au prix d'un microscope classique est vraiment intéressant. Bien entendu la qualité reste moindre. Pour construire votre propre miscroscope, il vous suffit d'avoir :Une planche de bois Deux morceaux de Plexiglas Quelques...

    Read the article

  • La RATP veut garder ses données pour elle et s'en prend à l'application d'un développeur, une démarche propriétaire à l'opposé de l'Open Data

    La RATP veut garder ses données pour elle Et s'en prend à l'application d'un développeur, une démarche propriétaire à l'opposé de l'Open Data Précisons le tout de suite, la Régie Autonome des Transports Parisiens (RATP) est dans son bon droit. Mais il y a certainement de meilleures manières de gérer ses droits. Pour les rares usagers qui ne le sauraient pas, la RATP, en plus de son activité de gestionnaire de transports, édite des applications destinées à faciliter la vie de ses usagers. Ces applications se trouvent notamment sur l'AppStore et sur l'Android Market. Un développeur français a néanmoins trouvé que ce service, dont une version premium était payante jusq...

    Read the article

  • Windows Phone 7.8 annoncé officiellement pour début 2013, l'OS apportera les fonctions de la version 8 aux terminaux incompatibles

    Quelles fonctionnalités doivent être intégrées à Windows Phone 7.8 ? Microsoft invite les utilisateurs à faire des propositions À côté de la mise à jour Windows Phone 8, sera publiée une autre pour les terminaux actuels sous l'OS mobile. Présenté comme un changement de génération technologique, Windows Phone 8 ne pourra pas tourner sur les dispositifs actuels. Raison pour laquelle, Microsoft prévoit la publication d'une version 7.8 afin de faire bénéficier des nouveautés de cette mise à jour à ses clients existants. Windows Phone 7.8 dispose déjà de quelques fonctionnalités de la version 8 comme une nouvelle interface pour l'écran de démarrage, permettant de redimensionner les tui...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft conteste la marque déposée "App Store", et pense que tous les acteurs du secteur des applications devraient pouvoir l'utiliser

    Microsoft conteste l'appartenance de la marque "App Store", et pense que tous les acteurs du secteur des applications devraient pouvoir l'utiliser « Microsoft s'oppose à la requête d'Apple n°77/525433 pour l'App Store sur le motif que «App Store» est générique pour les services de magasin de détail avec des applications et non enregistrable pour les services auxiliaires tels que la recherche et le téléchargement d'applications de ces magasins ». Il semble bien qu'il va y avoir un grand procès de plus dans le monde de l'IT. En effet, Microsoft vient de lancer un recours auprès de l'US Patent Office pour contester la légitimité du brevet sur la marque "App Store", détenu par Apple. Redmond soutient ...

    Read the article

  • La Preview du SDK de Windows Phone 8 disponible pour les développeurs ayant déjà publié une application sur le Marketplace

    La Preview du SDK de Windows Phone 8 disponible le 12 septembre mais pas pour tout le monde Parallèlement à la présentation des nouveaux terminaux Windows Phone 8 de Nokia, Microsoft a annoncé la date de sortie d'une préversion (quasi-finale) du Kit de développement pour l'OS mobile. Le SDK Windows Phone 8 pourra être téléchargé à partir du 12 septembre prochain, mais seulement pour un groupe restreint de développeurs, selon le billet de blog de Microsoft. Il semblerait que l'outil soit uniquement accessible aux personnes ayant déjà publié une application sur le MarketPlace Windows Phone. Ce choix de Micro...

    Read the article

  • Google Maps : Street View enrichit la WebApp accessible depuis les navigateurs mobiles, première réponse de Google à Apple

    Google Maps : StreetView enrichit la WebApp Accessible depuis les navigateurs mobiles, une première réponse de Google à la décision d'Apple Google vient d'ajouter StreetView à son application Web accessible depuis un navigateur mobile? et donc depuis un iPad ou un iPhone via Safari. Cette WebApp - enrichie de la fonctionnalité qui permet de naviguer virtuellement dans les rues de villes - est aujourd'hui le seul moyen pour Google de toucher les utilisateurs sous iOS depuis qu'Apple a décidé de mettre fin au partenariat qui faisait des Google Maps le service de cartographie par défaut de ses appareils. Pour les remplacer, Apple a sorti sa propre application. Mais son service...

    Read the article

  • Unity 4.5 est disponible et apporte le support d'OpenGL ES 3, un rendu plus naturel de la physique 2D et des optimisations

    Unity 4.5 est disponible : les corrections et améliorations du moteur sont très nombreuses OpenGL ES 3.0, amélioration de la physique 2D, chargement de scène amélioré, amélioration du flux de travail sur les shaders... Alors que dernièrement nous avons découvert ce que Unity 5 sera, l'équipe de développement nous apporte la version 4.5 du moteur. Celle-ci corrige près de 450 bogues mais apporte aussi de nouvelles fonctionnalités au moteur : support d'OpenGL ES 3.0 pour iOS (à partir des périphérique...

    Read the article

  • Mozilla sort en urgence Firefox 16.0.1, pour corriger une faille critique ayant entraîné la suspension des téléchargements du navigateur

    Firefox s'offre une ligne de commande le Developer Toolbar permet d'interagir avec une page, la bêta de la version 16 sort Ce sont les vacances pour certains, mais pas pour la fondation Mozilla qui reste fidèle à son cycle de développement rapide de Firefox. À peine la version 15 du navigateur disponible, son successeur pointe déjà le bout de son nez. Mozilla vient de faire passer Firefox 16 du Canal Aurora au Canal bêta, et vante déjà la nouveauté phare qui sera disponible au sein du navigateur. Firefox 16 dispose d'une nouvelle ligne de commande, permettant aux développeurs d'interagir de façon ...

    Read the article

  • Java RMI cannot connect to host from external client.

    - by Koe
    I've been using RMI in this project for a while. I've gotten the client program to connect (amongst other things) to the server when running it over my LAN, however when running it over the internet I'm running into the following exception: java.rmi.ConnectException: Connection refused to host: (private IP of host machine); nested exception is: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPEndpoint.newSocket(Unknown Source) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPChannel.createConnection(Unknown Source) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPChannel.newConnection(Unknown Source) at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invokeRemoteMethod(Unknown Source) at java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invoke(Unknown Source) at $Proxy1.ping(Unknown Source) at client.Launcher$PingLabel.runPing(Launcher.java:366) at client.Launcher$PingLabel.<init>(Launcher.java:353) at client.Launcher.setupContentPane(Launcher.java:112) at client.Launcher.<init>(Launcher.java:99) at client.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:59) Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(Unknown Source) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(Unknown Source) at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(Unknown Source) at java.net.SocksSocketImpl.connect(Unknown Source) at java.net.Socket.connect(Unknown Source) at java.net.Socket.connect(Unknown Source) at java.net.Socket.<init>(Unknown Source) at java.net.Socket.<init>(Unknown Source) at sun.rmi.transport.proxy.RMIDirectSocketFactory.createSocket(Unknown Source) at sun.rmi.transport.proxy.RMIMasterSocketFactory.createSocket(Unknown Source) ... 12 more This error is remeniscent of my early implementation of RMI and I can obtain the error verbatum if I run the client locally without the server program running as well. To me Connection Timed Out means a problem with the server's response. Here's the client initiation: public static void main(String[] args) { try { String host = "<WAN IP>"; Registry registry = LocateRegistry.getRegistry(host, 1099); Login lstub = (Login) registry.lookup("Login Server"); Information istub = (Information) registry.lookup("Game Server"); new Launcher(istub, lstub); } catch (RemoteException e) { System.err.println("Client exception: " + e.toString()); e.printStackTrace(); } catch (NotBoundException e) { System.err.println("Client exception: " + e.toString()); e.printStackTrace(); } } Interestingly enough no Remote Exception is thrown here. Here's the server initiation: public static void main(String args[]) { try { GameServer gobj = new GameServer(); Information gstub = (Information) UnicastRemoteObject.exportObject( gobj, 1099); Registry registry = LocateRegistry.createRegistry(1099); registry.bind("Game Server", gstub); LoginServer lobj = new LoginServer(gobj); Login lstub = (Login) UnicastRemoteObject.exportObject(lobj, 7099); // Bind the remote object's stub in the registry registry.bind("Login Server", lstub); System.out.println("Server ready"); } catch (Exception e) { System.err.println("Server exception: " + e.toString()); e.printStackTrace(); } } Bad practice with the catch(Exception e) I know but bear with me. Up to this stage I know it works fine over the LAN, here's where the exception occurs over the WAN and is the first place a method in the server is called: private class PingLabel extends JLabel { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; public PingLabel() { super(""); runPing(); } public void setText(String text) { super.setText("Ping: " + text + "ms"); } public void runPing() { try { PingThread pt = new PingThread(); gameServer.ping(); pt.setRecieved(true); setText("" + pt.getTime()); } catch (RemoteException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } That's a label placed on the launcher as a ping test. the method ping(), in gameserver does nothing, as in is a null method. It's worth noting also that ports 1099 and 7099 are forwarded to the server machine (which should be obvious from the stack trace). Can anyone see anyting I'm missing/doing wrong? If you need any more information just ask. EDIT: I'm practically certain the problem has nothing to do with my router settings. When disabling my port forwarding settings I get a slightly different error: Client exception: java.rmi.ConnectException: Connection refused to host: (-WAN IP NOT LOCAL IP-); but it appears both on the machine locally connected to the server and on the remote machine. In addition, I got it to work seamlessly when connecting the server straight tho the modem (cutting out the router. I can only conclude the problem is in my router's settings but can't see where (I've checked and double checked the port forwarding page). That's the only answer i can come up with.

    Read the article

  • Deployment Options for AutoVue 20.0 Users

    - by celine.beck
    AutoVue release 20.0 boasts a brand new architecture. As part of this product rearchitecture, AutoVue can now be deployed either as a desktop deployment to serve the needs of individual users in their personal productivity; or in a Client / Server deployment for those that require connections to enterprise applications / back-end systems. The most common question that we hear from our customers about this new architecture is the following: "Is AutoVue Desktop Version still part of release 20.0 and if so, what is the difference between AutoVue Desktop Version and the Desktop deployment of AutoVue release 20.0?" A detailed answer to these questions is provided in a very complete article entitled Understanding Deployment Options for AutoVue 19.3 Desktop Version users upgrading to AutoVue 20.0 (note 1058254.1) which was posted on My Oracle Support. Is AutoVue Desktop Version still part of AutoVue 20.0? Yes, AutoVue Desktop Version 20.0 is still available to customers and partners, as a maintenance release of AutoVue 19.3. As such, it will not contain any of the new capabilities featured in AutoVue release 20.0. All format enhancements and new format support have been added to release 20.0 Desktop Version though. What is the different between AutoVue Desktop Version 20.0 and the Desktop Deployment of AutoVue release 20.0? AutoVue 20.0 Desktop deployment works like the AutoVue Desktop version. It is installed as a standalone product on each user's machine and runs a local instance of AutoVue. The AutoVue 20.0 Desktop deployment includes all new features, formats and performance enhancements included in release 20.0 (walkthrough capability, improved compare, ...) What deployment options are available to AutoVue 19.3 Desktop Version customers? AutoVue Desktop Version users can evolve at their own pace to the new AutoVue platform. With release 20.0, customers can opt to: Option 1: Stay on AutoVue Desktop Version 20.0 Option 2: Migrate to AutoVue and select the desktop deployment method Option 3: Migrate to AutoVue and select the Client/Server deployment method What is the Client / Server deployment of AutoVue 20.0? The Client/Server deployment has AutoVue installed on a server, to which local client machines connect to access and view documents. AutoVue 20.0 Client Server Deployment allows users to leverage the new online/offline capabilities in release 20.0 and easily switch between online and offline modes of operation. With the Client/Server deployment, customers also get a complete, open and standards-based set of integration tools that allows them to tie AutoVue to any enterprise applications to provide users with a consistent view of data and business objects and expand workflow automation to document-based processes. Related articles: AutoVue Release 20.0 Now Available, New Walkthrough Capability in AutoVue 20.0, Watch the AutoVue 20.0 Release Webcast, April 27 at 12pm EST

    Read the article

  • Suggestions for connecting .NET WPF GUI with Java SE Server

    - by Sam Goldberg
    BACKGROUND We are building a Java (SE) trading application which will be monitoring market data and sending trade messages based on the market data, and also on user defined configuration parameters. We are planning to provide the user with a thin client, built in .NET (WPF) for managing the parameters, controlling the server behavior, and viewing the current state of the trading. The client doesn't need real-time updates; it will instead update the view once every few seconds (or whatever interval is configured by the user). The client has about 6 different operations it needs to perform with the server, for example: CRUD with configuration parameters query subset of the data receive updates of current positions from server It is possible that most of the different operations (except for receiving data) are just different flavors of managing the configuration parameters, but it's too early in our analysis for us to be sure. To connect the client with the server, we have been considering using: SOAP Web Service RESTful service building a custom TCP/IP based API (text or xml) (least preferred - but we use this approach with other applications we have) As best as I understand, pros and cons of the different web service flavors are: SOAP pro: totally automated in .NET (and Java), modifying server side interface require no code changes in communication layer, just running refresh on Web Service reference to regenerate the classes. con: more overhead in the communication layer sending more text, etc. We're not using J2EE container so maybe doesn't work so well with J2SE REST pro: lighter weight, less data. Has good .NET and Java support. (I don't have any real experience with this, so don't know what other benefits it has.) con: client will not be automatically aware if there are any new operations or properties added (?), so communication layer needs to be updated by developer if server interface changes. con: (both approaches) Server cannot really push updates to the client at regular intervals (?) (However, we won't mind if client polls the server to get updates.) QUESTION What are your opinions on the above options or suggestions for other ways to connect the 2 parts? (Ideally, we don't want to put much work into the communication layer, because it's not the significant part of the application so the more off-the-shelf and automated the better.)

    Read the article

  • Suggestions for connecting .NET WPF GUI with Java SE Server aoo

    - by Sam Goldberg
    BACKGROUND We are building a Java (SE) trading application which will be monitoring market data and sending trade messages based on the market data, and also on user defined configuration parameters. We are planning to provide the user with a thin client, built in .NET (WPF) for managing the parameters, controlling the server behavior, and viewing the current state of the trading. The client doesn't need real-time updates; it will instead update the view once every few seconds (or whatever interval is configured by the user). The client has about 6 different operations it needs to perform with the server, for example: CRUD with configuration parameters query subset of the data receive updates of current positions from server It is possible that most of the different operations (except for receiving data) are just different flavors of managing the configuration parameters, but it's too early in our analysis for us to be sure. To connect the client with the server, we have been considering using: SOAP Web Service RESTful service building a custom TCP/IP based API (text or xml) (least preferred - but we use this approach with other applications we have) As best as I understand, pros and cons of the different web service flavors are: SOAP pro: totally automated in .NET (and Java), modifying server side interface require no code changes in communication layer, just running refresh on Web Service reference to regenerate the classes. con: more overhead in the communication layer sending more text, etc. We're not using J2EE container so maybe doesn't work so well with J2SE REST pro: lighter weight, less data. Has good .NET and Java support. (I don't have any real experience with this, so don't know what other benefits it has.) con: client will not be automatically aware if there are any new operations or properties added (?), so communication layer needs to be updated by developer if server interface changes. con: (both approaches) Server cannot really push updates to the client at regular intervals (?) (However, we won't mind if client polls the server to get updates.) QUESTION What are your opinions on the above options or suggestions for other ways to connect the 2 parts? (Ideally, we don't want to put much work into the communication layer, because it's not the significant part of the application so the more off-the-shelf and automated the better.)

    Read the article

  • curl FTPS with client certificate to a vsftpd

    - by weeheavy
    I'd like to authenticate FTP clients either via username+password or a client certificate. Only FTPS is allowed. User/password works, but while testing with curl (I don't have another option) and a client certificate, I need to pass a user. Isn't it technically possible to authenticate only by providing a certificate? vsftpd.conf passwd_chroot_enable=YES chroot_local_user=YES ssl_enable=YES rsa_cert_file=usrlocal/ssl/certs/vsftpd.pem force_local_data_ssl=YES force_local_logins_ssl=YES Tested with curl -v -k -E client-crt.pem --ftp-ssl-reqd ftp://server:21/testfile the output is: * SSLv3, TLS handshake, Client hello (1): * SSLv3, TLS handshake, Server hello (2): * SSLv3, TLS handshake, CERT (11): * SSLv3, TLS handshake, Request CERT (13): * SSLv3, TLS handshake, Server finished (14): * SSLv3, TLS handshake, CERT (11): * SSLv3, TLS handshake, Client key exchange (16): * SSLv3, TLS handshake, CERT verify (15): * SSLv3, TLS change cipher, Client hello (1): * SSLv3, TLS handshake, Finished (20): * SSLv3, TLS change cipher, Client hello (1): * SSLv3, TLS handshake, Finished (20): * SSL connection using DES-CBC3-SHA * Server certificate: * SSL certificate verify result: self signed certificate (18), continuing anyway. > USER anonymous < 530 Anonymous sessions may not use encryption. * Access denied: 530 * Closing connection #0 * SSLv3, TLS alert, Client hello (1): curl: (67) Access denied: 530 This is theoretically ok, as i forbid anonymous access. If I specify a user with -u username:pass it works, but it would without a certificate too. The client certificate seems to be ok, it looks like this: client-crt.pem -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY----- content -----END RSA PRIVATE KEY----- -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- content -----END CERTIFICATE----- What am I missing? Thanks in advance. (The OS is Solaris 10 SPARC).

    Read the article

  • Any e-mail client with additional grouping functionality on Mac OS X?

    - by harald
    Hello, I'm very unhappy with my mail experience. I'm receiving a lot of mails from various clients and projects and need a way to better organize them. I would really love to have additional grouping-functionality with the e-mail client. Currently I'm using Mac OS X's Mail.app, but I am not bound to this. So I am open to any Mail.app-plugin or independent mail application commercial or not for Mac OS X -- should support IMAP, though -- but I think this should not be a problem nowadays? With Mail.app i'm doing the following: group by thread sort by datetime descending What I would love to have is not only additional tagging-functionality for e-mails -- I know, that at least thunderbird and postbox support them. I would love to have some additional grouping functionality for these tags -- inside the main mail window. So maybe I can summarize the important points: "native" Mac OS X mail client (no web-mailer please) automatic-tagging functionality (eg.: auto-apply tags by some kind of filter) easy access to tagged mails Easy access to tagged mails: I would really love to have some additional grouping functionality in the mail folders. The mail application should put all tagged mails in a group -- the groups should be sorted by last received e-mail. Inside the group I would still like to have the possiblity to group by thread. or It would be ok to have a list of tags (topics) on the left pane of the mail client. For example postbox: There is the 'accounts-section', there is the 'folders-section' -- but why is there no 'topics-section'? Thanks very much,

    Read the article

  • A Trip to the Moon (Le Voyage dans la Lune) [Super Retro Classic Sci-Fi Video]

    - by Asian Angel
    If you are into retro sci-fi movies, then you will definitely want to have a look at this French classic from 1902. This silent movie is only 10.5 minutes long, but is well worth watching and makes for a fun romp through the early days of sci-fi. From YouTube: A Trip to the Moon (French: Le Voyage dans la lune) is a 1902 French black and white silent science fiction film. It is loosely based on two popular novels of the time: From the Earth to the Moon by Jules Verne and The First Men in the Moon by H. G. Wells. The film was written and directed by Georges Melies, assisted by his brother Gaston. The film runs 14 minutes if projected at 16 frames per second, which was the standard frame rate at the time the film was produced. It was extremely popular at the time of its release and is the best-known of the hundreds of fantasy films made by Melies. A Trip to the Moon is the first science fiction film, and utilizes innovative animation and special effects, including the iconic shot of the rocketship landing in the Moon’s eye. A Trip to the Moon / Le Voyage dans la lune – 1902 [via 20 best designs in sci-fi movies - Page 3 (Creative Bloq)] How to Use an Xbox 360 Controller On Your Windows PC Download the Official How-To Geek Trivia App for Windows 8 How to Banish Duplicate Photos with VisiPic

    Read the article

  • How to react when the client's response is negative on delivery?

    - by ZiG
    I am a junior programmer. Since my supervisor told me to sit in with the client, I joined. I saw the unsatisfied face of the client despite the successful (from my programmer's perspective) delivery of the project! Client: You could have included this! Us: Was not in the specification! Client: Common Sense! As a programmer, how do you respond in this situation?

    Read the article

  • java.rmi.UnmarshalException: unable to pull client classes by server

    - by andrews
    Hi, I have an RMI client/server set-up on two machines that works fine in a simple situation when the server doesn't require a client-side defned class. However, when I need to use a class defined on the client side I am unable to have the server unmarshall those classes. I suspect this is an issue with my java.rmi.server.codebase property that I pass in as argument to the client app. I followed Sun's RMI Tutorial trail and I think I have followed the steps exactly except that I don't specify a classpath argument when executing client and server because they execute in the directory right above the root package directory (however I tried that too with no effect). The exceptions I get when attempting to execute the different client-side combinations described in detail below are all the same: RmiServer exception: java.rmi.ServerException: RemoteException occurred in server thread; nested exception is: java.rmi.UnmarshalException: error unmarshalling arguments; nested exception is: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: test.MyTask at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:353) at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:177) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:173) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:553) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(TCPTransport.java:808) at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:667) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java:255) at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteCall.java:233) at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:142) at java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invokeRemoteMethod(RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.java:178) at java.rmi.server.RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteObjectInvocationHandler.java:132) at $Proxy0.execute(Unknown Source) at test.myClient.main(myClient.java:32) The details are: My client/server rmi is set up over a home network behind a router. The router is assigned to a static ip address I will call myhostname. Appropriate port-mapping is set-up in the router that points to the right machines. role, machine, os, ip-address: server, venice, linux ubuntu 9.10, 10.0.1.2 client, naples, mac os x leopard, 10.0.1.4 I startup the server side as follows inside /home/andrews/workspace/epsilon/bin: 1 starting registry on the default port 1099: venice% rmiregistry & 2 starting web-server on port 2001 pointing to code base for common interfaces: venice% java webserver/ClassFileServer 2001 /home/andrew/workspace/epsilon/bin 3 starting server app (main class in test/myServer) which registers the server object: venice% java -Djava.rmi.server.codebase="http://myhostname:2001/" -Djava.security.policy=server.policy -Djava.rmi.server.hostname=myhostname test/myServer & Now the client side inside /Users/andrews/Development/Java/workspace/epsilon/bin: 1 start a local web server that can server client-side classes to the server (not sure if this is needed, but I added I tried it, and still no success; I have added port-mapping to the router for 2001 to venice, for 2002 to naples) naples$ java webserver/ClassFileServer 2002 /Users/andrews/Development/Java/workspace/epsilon/bin/ Trying to run the client (note: I don't specify the -cp argument because client executes right above the root package directory): 1 try #1 using an http hostname naples$ java -Djava.rmi.server.codebase=http://10.0.1.4:2002/ -Djava.security.policy=client.policy test.myClient myhostname Note 1: the myhostname argument at the end is passed-in to the client so that it resolves to server's rmi hostname. Note 2: I tried using localhost:2002 instead of 10.0.1.4:2002 too. Note 3: I tried using myhostname:2002 since myhostname is assigned to the router and I have proper port-mapping set-up, this address should resolve to naples and not venice 2 try #2: naples$ java -Djava.rmi.server.codebase=file:/Users/andrews/Development/Java/workspace/epsilon/bin/ -Djava.security.policy=client.policy test.myClient myhostname Note 1: the code base url format is correct, I created a small program to convert current file directory path into a url and used that. using file:///Users... has same effect. Other notes: 1 my server and client policy files correctly specify the path, as I've tested this setup with good and bad paths, and getting a security exception for bad path 2 this setup works if I don't use client-side defined objects, the client connects correctly to the server and the server executes. 3 when I place the client-side class on the server in the server's classpath, all executes fine. All help is appreciated.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110  | Next Page >