Search Results

Search found 5991 results on 240 pages for 'w3 validation'.

Page 106/240 | < Previous Page | 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113  | Next Page >

  • Javascript data parsing in IE vs other browsers... It seems kinda screwed up. What's the deal?

    - by Carter
    Firstly, when I say other browsers I really only mean Firefox because that's all I tested in. Internet Explorer can parse a date followed by a single character as a proper date. Whereas Firefox behaves as I'd expect. For example... var dateString = new Date("1/1/2010f"); alert(dateString); In IE it will alert... Thu Dec 31 21:00:00 UTC-0900 2009 Whereas in FF is will spit out... "Invalid Date" I first noticed this using the jquery validation plug in. http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Validation/Methods/date It seems like it just subtracts some amount of hours off the actual date in IE when a character is appended. I've tested in IE6 and IE8. Am I missing something?

    Read the article

  • I have to do two seemingly mutually exclusive things on leaving an asp:textbox. Please help me get

    - by aape
    This project has gone from being a simple '99 Ford F-150 to the Homer. I've got controls with a gridview with textboxes for data entry. All the user controls on the pages are in AJAX updatepanels. User types in a database column or budget entity or some other financial thing they want to include in the report. The textboxes in the gridview have autopostback = true set. overly long background info When the user leaves the textbox, during the postback (triggered by onTextChanged) I do some validation back on the server on their entry - regexs, do they have rights to that column, is that column locked, etc. If it fails, I put a error message next to the textbox. If it passes, I wipe out any title or error that used to be next to the code. Focus is getting lost from the postback if they're tabbing out of the box, rather than going to the next textbox in the gridview. So to fix that I need, if their leaving the tb via the tab key, to also figure out what textbox or gridviewrow they're on, if they're not on the last row, and after the validation and labeling, put the focus on the textbox in the next row. I can't figure out how, in ontextchanged, to find what caused me to leave the textbox, so I'm thinking use javascript onkeyup to test the key pressed and then find the next box etc, but the ontextchanged fires first and then the js never does, and also, since the control is all AJAXed, the javascript can't find the textboxes because when you enter the page everything is collapsed (the requirements people loooove to collapse and expand things), and so when it's expanded, all the 'new' textboxes are up in the viewstate stuff in the page source, and not down where javascript can see them. The questions So I'm wondering if I can have an onblur in the javascript that can trigger a postback where I can do my validation and such, and either 1) include the keypressed or pick it out of sender in the event or 2) followup the onblur with onkeyup and somehow figure out what textbox is next on the grid and throw focus there. Or, is there another .NET based approach that could work for this? In terms of tearing the whole thing down and starting from scratch, I couldn't sell that to the bosses, I'm past the point of no return as far as that goes.

    Read the article

  • Will Visual Studio 2010 support HTML 5?

    - by Chris
    Since Visual Studio 2010 is slated for release in March of 2010 and HTML 5 is now starting to be used even more widely, I would like to know if Visual Studio will ship with HTML 5 templates, standard controls and support for the more common markup? A definition for support of HTML 5 would be that any new version of Visual Studio should have similar support for code-completion, validation and markup that is currently supported for HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 and 1.1. Update From the Visual Web Develolper Team Blog: HTML 5 intellisense and validation schema for Visual Studio 2008 and Visual Web Developer is for downloading. Follow the instructions posted on the page to install the new scheme. Seems like the Visual Studio Team will be supporting HTML 5 after all.

    Read the article

  • Remembering Form information

    - by Pete Herbert Penito
    Hi everyone! I'm sorry if this has been asked before but I feel my situation is a little different... I have a huge form (like 50 questions involving checkboxes, drop downs, text boxes and textareas) When a user submits a form and the validation page throws an error, is there an easy way to keep the info they entered? My intitial form is on form.php and then the form action is form_posted.php, before anything is run on form_posted.php I have my validation code which sends the user back to form.php with an error number (eg. form.php?error=3) if there was a problem with any in particular. This is done with header("form.php?error=3") so on form.php do the posted variables exist? even tho the page wasn't specifically sent with any posted variables. Also if this is the case, is it completely secure to be making the value of a textbox what it was before? like <input type="text" value="php echo $_POSTED["username"] ?>">

    Read the article

  • Design pattern for data entry forms with LINQ2SQL

    - by petebob796
    I am about to start a new winforms data entry application, it already has the database designed which I am comfortable with. I was going to use LINQ2SQL to access the tables to keep things type safe but am now wondering about design patterns, something I am just getting into. Since LINQ is giving me objects to use should I still create classes in between to hold the validation code and helper methods or should these just go in with the UI? It just seems I will end up with classes sat in between with little code which will cause the UI classes to have code just getting and setting values in the intermediate class and returning from validation to flag errors... Any good reading on this? Should I consider the entity framework (or similar) instead?

    Read the article

  • Is this multi line if statement too complex?

    - by AndHeCodedIt
    I am validating input on a form and attempting to prompt the user of improper input(s) based on the combination of controls used. For example, I have 2 combo boxes and 3 text boxes. The 2 combo boxes must always have a value other than the first (default) value, but one of three, or two of three, or all text boxes can be filled to make the form valid. In one such scenario I have a 6 line if statement to try to make the test easily readable: if ((!String.Equals(ComboBoxA.SelectedValue.ToString(), DEFAULT_COMBO_A_CHOICE.ToString()) && !String.IsNullOrEmpty(TextBoxA.Text) && !String.Equals(ComboBoxB.SelectedValue.ToString(), DEFAULT_COMBO_B_CHOICE.ToString())) || (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(TextBoxB.Text) || !String.IsNullOrEmpty(TextBoxC.Text))) { //Do Some Validation } I have 2 questions: Should this type of if statement be avoided at all cost? Would it be better to enclose this test in another method? (This would be a good choice as this validation will happen in more than one scenario) Thanks for your input(s)!

    Read the article

  • Validates presence of each other in two associated models

    - by Sergey Alekseev
    I have the following two models: class Parent < ActiveRecord::Base has_one :child, dependent: :destroy validates :child, presence: true end class Child < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :parent validates :parent, presence: true end I want to create Parent object. If I do the following: Parent.create! or Factory(:parent) Exception raises: ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: Child can't be blank But I can't create Child object without Parent object for the same reason - I need to create Parent object first in order to pass presence validation. As it appears I have some kind of infinite recursion here. How to solve it?

    Read the article

  • Convert Json date string to JavaScript date object

    - by dagda1
    Hi, I have the following JSON object which has a date field in the following format: { "AlertDate": "\/Date(1277334000000+0100)\/", "Progress": 1, "ReviewPeriod": 12 } I want to write a regular expression or a function to convert it to a javascript object so that it is in the form: { "AlertDate": "AlertDate":new Date(1277334000000), "Progress": 1, "ReviewPeriod": 12 } The above date format fails validation in the JQuery parseJSON method. I would like to convert the 1277334000000+0100 into the correct number of milliseconds to create the correct date when eval is called after validation. Can anyone help me out with a good approach to solving this? Cheers Paul

    Read the article

  • aspx page gives viewstate error

    - by Priya10
    Hi, I have a simple aspx page with one grid view. When deployed on server, and accessed through that machine, it works fine. However, when connected through load balancer, we get this error ( when click on any button). The page however refreshes when pressed F5. Validation of viewstate MAC failed. If this application is hosted by a Web Farm or cluster, ensure that <machineKey> configuration specifies the same validationKey and validation algorithm. AutoGenerate cannot be used in a cluster. Any idea what is happening here???

    Read the article

  • Using xval with fields containing periods

    - by JP
    Hello, I have been using xVal with success for a while but this evening ran into an issue where a field containing a period would not be validated (client or server-side). I am using ASP.NET MVC2 and need to use the period syntax in cases where I am model binding to a list. In the below example I am using a textbox for the sake of simplicity: xVal.AttachValidator(null, { "Fields": [{ "FieldName": "entry[622592].Value", "FieldRules": [{ "RuleName": "Required", "RuleParameters": {}}]}] }, {}) <input type="text" class="text" name="entry[622592].Value"/> If I replace both instances of "entry[622592].Value" to something trivial like "test" then the validation works successfully, but if i leave it this way the validation never appears to fire... Has anyone run into this issue? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • How to set Minimum and Maximum Character limitation to EditText in Android?

    - by nishitpatel
    I am new to android here i have very silly problem i want to set my Edit text box minimum and maximum input value. Here I am creating one Simple validation for Edit text it only take A-Z and 0-9 value with minimum 5 and Maximum 8 character. I set the Maximum and other validation as follow. <EditText android:id="@+id/edittextKode_Listing" android:layout_width="match_parent" android:layout_height="wrap_content" android:layout_marginRight="5dp" android:layout_marginLeft="5dp" android:layout_alignTop="@+id/textKode_listing" android:layout_toRightOf="@+id/textKode_listing" android:maxLength="8" android:inputType="textCapCharacters" android:digits="0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTVUWXYZ" /> but not able to set Minimum requirement. My Edit text is in alert dialog and i also apply the following code to solve this problem ` private void openInboxDialog() { LayoutInflater inflater = this.getLayoutInflater(); // declare dialog view final View dialogView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.kirim_layout, null); final EditText edittextKode = (EditText) dialogView.findViewById(R.id.edittextKode_Listing); final EditText edittextalamat = (EditText) dialogView.findViewById(R.id.edittextAlamat); edittextKode.setOnFocusChangeListener(new OnFocusChangeListener() { @Override public void onFocusChange(View v, boolean hasFocus) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub if(edittextKode.getText().toString().length() > 0){ if(edittextKode.getText().toString().length() < 5) { edittextKode.setError("Error"); Toast.makeText(GPSActivity.this, "Kode listing value not be less than 5", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show(); edittextKode.requestFocus(); } } } }); final AlertDialog.Builder builder = new AlertDialog.Builder(GPSActivity.this); builder.setTitle("Kirim").setView(dialogView) .setNeutralButton("OK", new DialogInterface.OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(DialogInterface dialog, int which) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub gpsCoordinates = (TextView) findViewById(R.id.text_GPS_Coordinates); kode = edittextKode.getText().toString(); alamat = edittextalamat.getText().toString(); catatan = edittextcatatan.getText().toString(); pengirim = edittextPengirim.getText().toString(); if (kode.length() > 0 && alamat.length() > 0 && catatan.length() > 0 && pengirim.length() > 0) { message = "Kode listing : " + kode + "\nAlamat : " + alamat + " \nCatatan : " + catatan + " \n Pengirim : " + pengirim + "\nKoordinat GPS : " + gpsCoordinates.getText().toString(); sendByGmail(); } else { Toast.makeText( getApplicationContext(), "Please fill all three fields to send mail", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show(); } } }); builder.create(); builder.show(); }` in this alert dialog i have two edittext i want to apply my validation on first edittext i called the setOnFocusChangeListener to check its minimum length on focus change and if length is less than 5 request for focus but it still type in second edittext. please help me out.

    Read the article

  • Toggle alternative

    - by Nutmeg
    In a contactform I am using both the jQuery validation plug-in 1.3 and the following (slide) script: $(document).ready(function() { // Expand Panel $("#open").click(function(){ $("div#contact").slideDown("slow"); }); // Collapse Panel $("#close").click(function(){ $("div#contact").slideUp("bounce"); }); // Switch buttons from "Log In | Register" to "Close Panel" on click $("#toggle a").click(function () { $("#toggle a").toggle(); }); }); Problem is that the validation plug-in 1.3 uses the following segment: addWrapper:function(toToggle){if(this.settings.wrapper)toToggle.push(toToggle.parents(this.settings.wrapper));return toToggle;}, which conflicts with the slide code. What's the smartest way to go about this? Using the toggleClass instead? Thanks for your help!

    Read the article

  • Why my jquery is not working for a span tag

    - by Shantanu Gupta
    I am trying to display some message in span. but it is not working. <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function(){ /****************************First Name validation******************************/ $("#txtFirstName").bind("focusout",function(){ if($(this).val()=="" || $(this).val()=="First Name") { $(this).siblings("span[id*='error']").text("First Name Required"); $(this).val("First Name"); } }); $("#txtFirstName").bind("focusin",function(){ if($(this).val()=="First Name") { $(this).siblings("span[id*='error']").show("slow").text(""); $(this).val(""); } }); /********************End First Name validation*****************************/ }); Here is my html code for above code <td><input id="txtFirstName" type="text" value="First Name" runat="server"/><span class="error"></span></td>

    Read the article

  • validate XML with XSD in c++

    - by katl
    Hi! Im pretty new to both XML validation and C++ (more familiar with Java..) so I guess this is a trivial question. If I have a XML file and a XSD schema, how is the best way to validate them? Id like to to this in c++ without using external libraries, or as little libraries as possible, is it possible? Other ideas of how this can be done? I want a simple solution, the output needed is just if the validation i successful or not. Any help is appreciated // Katarina

    Read the article

  • What is the proper way to check the previous value of a field before saving an object? (Using Django

    - by anonymous coward
    I have a Django Model with updated_by and an approved_by fields, both are ForeignKey fields to the built-in (auth) User models. I am aware that with updated_by, it's easy enough to simply over-ride the .save() method on the Model, and shove the request.user in that field before saving. However, for approved_by, this field should only ever be filled in when a related field (date_approved) is first filled in. I'm somewhat certain that I can check this logically, and fill in the field if the previous value was empty. What is the proper way to check the previous value of a field before saving an object? I do not anticipate that date_approved will ever be changed or updated, nor should there be any reason to ever update the approved_by entry. UPDATE: Regarding forms/validation, I should have mentioned that none of the fields in question are seen by or editable by users of the site. If I have misunderstood, I'm sorry, but I'm not sure how forms and validation apply to my question.

    Read the article

  • validating radiogroup with perl/cgi

    - by Tyug
    Is it possible to validate a radio group (so something is checked off, or chosen) using server-side validation with Perl? If so, how? I already have it for JavaScript, but I want this form to be able to be submitted even without JavaScript enabled. Thus I will need the validation on the server-side. There is no fixed name for the radio group, it can change, however there must be a name, so that @names = $cgi->param() will give all the names. I'm thinking along something that will give me the type, like the type in JavaScript, to determine if it's a radio button in a group.

    Read the article

  • <Control>.Focus() from server side doesn't scroll into view

    - by George
    Custom Validation Control: <asp:CustomValidator ID="valSex" runat="server" ErrorMessage="1.2 &lt;b&gt;Sex&lt;/b&gt; not specified" EnableClientScript="true" ClientValidationFunction="ValidateSex" SetFocusOnError="True">Selection required</asp:CustomValidator> Client Side validation routine: function ValidateSex(source, args) { var optMale = document.getElementById("<%=optMale.ClientID %>"); var optFemale = document.getElementById("<%=optFemale.ClientID %>"); if (!optMale.checked && !optFemale.checked) { args.IsValid = false; optMale.focus(); } else args.IsValid = true; } When the page is submitted and Sex is not specified, focus is set but the 2 radio buttons are not quite in view, vertical scrolling is required to bring them into view. Shouldn't the Focus() method have brought the focus control into view?

    Read the article

  • need help in positioning

    - by teki
    i am using "beassistance validation" for my form and using tooltip plugin and it work fine except that positioning. please have a look at this link and i upload my form to get an idea what i am talking about. what i want is: if my validation fails i want to display the message after the tooltip icon, but its displaying the message before the tooltip icon. please see here here is the .css i am using: validation .css #aspnetForm { width: 670px; } #aspnetForm label.error { margin-left: 10px; width: auto; display: inline; } form.cmxform { width: 50em; } em.error { background: url("Images/unchecked.gif") no-repeat 0px 0px; padding-left: 16px; } em.success { background: url("Images/checked.gif") no-repeat 0px 0px; padding-left: 16px; } form.cmxform label.error { margin-left: auto; width: 250px; } #aspnetForm label.error { background: url("Images/unchecked.gif") no-repeat 0px 0px; padding-left: 16px; padding-bottom: 2px; font-weight: bold; color: #EA5200; } #aspnetForm label.checked { background: url("Images/checked.gif") no-repeat 0px 0px; } em.error { color: black; } #warning { display: none; } <asp:Label runat="server" ID='Label8' >Start Date:</asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="txtStartDate" runat='server' ></asp:TextBox> <a style="cursor: hand" class="tooltip" title="Select the starting date of a visit, example 05/05/2010 (MM/DD/YYYY)!"> <img alt="" src="Scripts/JQuery/Tooltip/icon_tooltip.gif" style="width: 11px; height: 11px" /></a> <p> </p> <asp:Label runat="server" ID='Label9' >End Date:</asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="txtEndDate" runat='server' ></asp:TextBox> <a style="cursor: hand" class="tooltip" title="Select the end date of a visit, example 05/06/2010 (MM/DD/YYYY)!"> <img alt="" src="Scripts/JQuery/Tooltip/icon_tooltip.gif" style="width: 11px; height: 11px" /></a> tooltip.css #tooltip{ position:absolute; border:1px solid #333; background:#f7f5d1; padding:2px 5px; color:#333; display:none; }

    Read the article

  • Seeking assistance with Escaping Data for MySQL queries

    - by JM4
    Please don't send me a link to php.net referencing mysql_real_escape_string as the only response. I have read through the page and while I understand the general concepts, I am having some trouble based on how my INSERT statement is currently built. Today, I am using the following: $sql = "INSERT INTO tablename VALUES ('', '$_SESSION['Member1FirstName'], '$_SESSION['Member1LastName'], '$_SESSION['Member1ID'], '$_SESSION['Member2FirstName'], '$_SESSION['Member2LastName'], '$_SESSION['Member2ID'] .... and the list goes on for 20+ members with some other values entered. It seems most people in the examples already have all their data stored in an array. On my site, I accept form inputs, action="" is set to self, php validation takes place and if validation passes, data is stored into SESSION variables on page 2 then redirected to the next page in the process (page 3) (approximately 8-10 pages in the whole process). thanks!

    Read the article

  • Jquery Match() IP Address?

    - by user1635970
    I'm using a jquery script to validate form fields. This works well, but I'd like to change the validation of one field to check for IP Addresses. The regex I want to use is : \b(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\b How do I amend the below to work with this ? (This is how the validation works for email address) jQuery("#Email").validate({ expression: "if (VAL.match(/^[^\\W][a-zA-Z0-9\\_\\-\\.]+([a-zA-Z0-9\\_\\-\\.]+)*\\@[a-zA-Z0-9_]+(\\.[a-zA-Z0-9_]+)*\\.[a-zA-Z]{2,4}$/)) return true; else return false;", message: "Should be a valid Email id" });

    Read the article

  • how to don't store a repeated field of a Symfony form?

    - by user454760
    Hello everybody, I am working with Symfony 1.4 and Doctrine. I have a model A with a email field. The form of A, display an input in which the user should insert the email correctly. But as everybody know sometiemes they don't do it. To fix this i have insert an extra field in the model (and in the form), called *repeat_email* to prevent the misspellings. Then, in the validation process, after validates all the fields, i use a global validator to compare the data of the two fields. This works, but i don't want to have the email stored two times in the database (i don't want the *repeat_email*). Is there any mechanism to use it in the validation process, but not to store it in the database? Thanks,

    Read the article

  • Any way to not break on certain errors in Visual Studio 2010?

    - by Vulgrin
    I'm working on a VS2010 project where I'm using DataAnnotations on my objects to handle validation. However, this is sort of a pain in the butt while trying to do interactive debugging because it keeps pausing VS.Net on validation errors. Obviously, I want to break on some errors, but not these particular types. Am I out of luck and I just need to turn on and off my Break on All Errors setting? Or is there some way to tell VS to just ignore these when they happen? (these are errors generated via Validator.ValidateProperty calls.) Thanks

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113  | Next Page >