Search Results

Search found 21184 results on 848 pages for 'cable internet'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 108/848 | < Previous Page | 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115  | Next Page >

  • Best solution for Multi-WAN failover (inside & out)?

    - by Sean O
    Looking for a way to setup 2 ISPs in failover mode, for both incoming & outgoing traffic, for our small (<100 devices) network. The leading contender for now seems to be the Peplink Balance 310. However, a reseller I spoke with said it's great for 100% outgoing connectivity, but didn't seem to be confident in its abilities to handle incoming traffic. This is important as we host our own web site, Exchange e-mail, and virtual desktops (RDP). Do any Peplink owners use this for failover of incoming traffic? Are there other devices I should be considering? We're currently using a Cisco 1800 series router & ASA 5500 series firewall, with Comcast & T-1 lines (the goal being to replace the T with DSL/FiOS {whenever that becomes availble}). Price range: ~$1000 - $2500 USD. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Server IP Release Time

    - by DanSpd
    Hello, With router IP Address does not change at all as long as you do not touch modem. If computer is connected to modem directly IP changes every hour or so. Whats causing it and how to fix. P.S. I am talking about WAN IP and not LAN IP

    Read the article

  • Server IP Release Time

    - by DanSpd
    Hello, With router IP Address does not change at all as long as you do not touch modem. If computer is connected to modem directly IP changes every hour or so. Whats causing it and how to fix. P.S. I am talking about WAN IP and not LAN IP

    Read the article

  • prevent IE8 tabs from opening tabs in stack in taskbar

    - by Nano8Blazex
    This may have been asked before too... But, anyways. I'm using Windows 7 Ultimate, and IE 8, and have the taskbar in icon view. I'm not sure how to explain this, but I'm amazed at how each tab in IE8 seems to act like a new "process" in the taskbar (as if each tab was a window). Like... each tab acts like a different window in the taskbar although they are actually running in the same window. Now when I use IE 8 it looks (in the taskbar) like there's 15 windows open when in fact the taskbar is simply showing the 15 tabs. More simply put, it's displaying a "stack" for all of the tabs when I'd rather have the icon act like, for example, firefox so that a stack is only shown for the multiple windows. I know that they are meant to be running as separate processes to prevent crashing and the such... but is there a way to disable this strange "taskbar" effect? I'd rather have the taskbar show the main window and not the tabs individually. There has to be a simple way to do this...

    Read the article

  • ip addresses/domain names are geographical bound?

    - by ajsie
    i wonder if ips are bound to specific geolocations? lets say that i've got this ip 111.111.111.111 from my ISP to my home computer in France. is it possible for me to use this ip in Norway? and the same goes with domain names. if iv'e got a domain name like mydomain.de, does it mean that my computer has to be in Germany or could it be located in Denmark? cause i always wonder where the actual server is located every time a website got different top level domains, eg google.dk, google.fr, google.de and so on. are they located in same country as the top domain or doesnt it matter?

    Read the article

  • Has anyone used the sharedband connection bonding product?

    - by John Rennie
    See http://www.sharedband.com/ for details on the product. Obviously Sharedband aren't too keen on giving away their technical secrets, but I would guess that it bonds the connections at the IP layer i.e. their routers send the IP packets to the SharedBand routers over all available lines and the ShareBand routers handle all the virtual circuitry and provide the NATing to whatever IP address(es) they've assigned you. It looks a clever idea, and a good way to provide some resilience over ADSL links. You can even use ADSL links from different ISPs and SharedBand will still bond them for you. But, I find myself wondering how well it really works, and whether it's worth it. The Draytek routers can already load balance (though not bond) up to four ADSL lines, so the SharedBand product really only offers an advantage if you're hosting servers i.e. you can have one IP address to accept incoming connections through all your (working) ADSL lines. But should you really try and host servers using ADSL lines, especially since ADSL upload performance isn't stellar? Wouldn't it be better to use a hosted server, or maybe pay up for a leased line with a SLA? So I'm asking if anyone is using SharedBand, and if so what do you think of it? JR

    Read the article

  • Why would cat6 connectors not work with cat5e patch cable?

    - by Lee Tickett
    I had a naff batch of cat5 connectors (the latching mechanism didn't work) so decided to order in some cat6 connectors in preparation for the inevitable upgrade. My existing reel of for making patch cables is cat5e utp stranded. I made up a few cables and tested them- none of them worked. I recrimped and still nothing. When i check them with a multi-meter not all pins are connected. This reel has always worked with the previous cat5 connectors so I tested the cat6 connectors on a reel of solid cat5e cable and they work fine. Any ideas what I might be doing wrong? Or what might be at fault? (cable/connectors) and how I can diagnose? Thanks Lee

    Read the article

  • Clicking a link in IE6 doesn't load page (internal DNS entry on our intranet)

    - by Callum
    I have a very strange problem that is only affecting some versions of IE6. The problem does affect IE 6.0.2900.5512, but does not seem to affect 6.0.3790.3959 Basically I work for a company and we have an intranet. While I'm not an expert on "internal DNS pointers", what I was able to do was create a website (let's say about football), and when an employee who is sitting behind the company firewall types the word "football" in to the web address bar of their web browser, they get redirected to a particular server. I am told this is some kind "internally pointing DNS entry". So, I've set one of these up, and I have a placed a link to it on our company intranet page. However, when the link is clicked in IE6.0.2900.5512, the page goes blank. Clicking "refresh" then loads the correct page (the one specified in the link). Can anyone help me out here. I have tried changing the way URL is formed, everything from //football to http://football/ etc. The link works fine in every other browser and IE7+, but unfoturnatly, IE6 is still the most common browser in use at my organisation.

    Read the article

  • Automatically clear cache of all major browsers installed

    - by MorganTiley
    I would like a way to clear cache from all my locally installed browsers - quickly and easily. A simple utility that would ask "Clear all browser caches?" with Yes/No. Just the major browsers -IE, Firefox, Safari, Chrome and optionally Opera I understand CCleaner can do this but it is not as simple as I would like (as it has other functions as well). I tried googling/stacking and couldn't find anything.

    Read the article

  • What's with all the mailing archives?

    - by Yuval
    When I google for certain questions, or problems I run into I would sometimes run into 'archive' sites - these sites contain forum questions or information from other sites that are extremely poorly formatted, and are copies of the well formatted original posts from various forums. An example of one of those sites in mail-archive.com and various similar sites. Can anybody explain to me why those sites exist and how come they don't get banned from Google (since all they have is copied content that is really poorly formatted by bots)? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Our wi-fi at work is ridiculously slow, will adding more range extenders improve it?

    - by john
    At work, we have two wireless networks (e.g., Work1 Work2); the Work2 is used downstairs and Work1 is used upstairs. However, both are notoriously slow. The connection is better when we are wired in, but unfortunately due to our building being very old and our company growing very fast, most employees are not seated near the walls where the ethernet cables are. I had Cox, our ISP, run a bandwidth utilization test and it doesn't seem like we are capping out on upstream/downstream, which leads me to believe that it's strictly an issue with the wireless networks (which were implemented before I got there). The wireless networks are both Apple Airport Extremes. Is there anything I can do to improve the situation for everyone? Speeds are extremely slow, and sometimes drops out.

    Read the article

  • AT&T U-verse 2Wire Router - Increase session table limit?

    - by caleban
    AT&T U-verse VDSL "fiber to the node" 24Mbit down / 3Mbit up 2Wire Router Model 3800HGV-B Software Version 6.1.9.24-enh.tm The 2Wire router appears to have a limit of 1024 TCP and UDP sessions. This limit appears to apply to all sessions regardless of any static IP, firewall off, DMZ plus, secondary router configurations. I've tried using the 2Wire router alone and also configuring the 2Wire static IP addressing, firewall off, DMZ plus, etc. setup along with my own pfSense router/firewall. Either way it appears I exceed the 1024 session limit and sessions start being reset. Running out of sessions isn't being caused by torrents or p2p etc. We're a business and our legitimate uses are exceeding this session limit. AT&T tells me it's not possible to bridge the router or increase or avoid the session table limit. I'm curious if anyone has found a way around either of these issues.

    Read the article

  • LinkedIn Slow on Windows XP with IE 8

    - by Kanini
    On my desktop, which runs Windows XP SP2 with IE 8, LinkedIn takes ages to load. However, with Chrome, it loads comparitively quicker. However, on my laptop which runs Windows Vista with IE8, it is awesomely quick! What could be the reasons?

    Read the article

  • How to delete Chrome temp data (history, cookies, cache) using command line

    - by Dio Phung
    On Windows 7, I tried running this script but still cannot clear Chrome temp data. Can someone figure out what's wrong with the script? Where do Chrome store history and cache ? Thanks ECHO -------------------------------------- ECHO **** Clearing Chrome cache taskkill /F /IM "chrome.exe">nul 2>&1 set ChromeDataDir=C:\Users\%USERNAME%\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default set ChromeCache=%ChromeDataDir%\Cache>nul 2>&1 del /q /s /f "%ChromeCache%\*.*">nul 2>&1 del /q /f "%ChromeDataDir%\*Cookies*.*">nul 2>&1 del /q /f "%ChromeDataDir%\*History*.*">nul 2>&1 set ChromeDataDir=C:\Users\%USERNAME%\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\User Data\Default set ChromeCache=%ChromeDataDir%\Cache>nul 2>&1 del /q /s /f "%ChromeCache%\*.*">nul 2>&1 del /q /f "%ChromeDataDir%\*Cookies*.*">nul 2>&1 del /q /f "%ChromeDataDir%\*History*.*">nul 2>&1 ECHO **** Clearing Chrome cache DONE

    Read the article

  • No web browsers open on Windows XP

    - by Carlos Torres
    I'm having a weird problem here. I upgraded a Windows XP computer from IE6 to IE8 yesterday and everything seemed to work normally until today. Now I can't open any browser on this computer. The computer had Google Chrome installed and it suddenly disappeared, I installed it again and now it dowsn't open either. I also installed Firefox and the same thing happened. The computer had no anti virus, I installed Ad-Aware, run a full scan and it detected some malware, but browsers are still not working Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Make IE stop asking me to install adobe flash player

    - by Sam
    I don't have adobe flash player installed, and don't miss the flashing ads a bit. The only thing that annoys me: IE8 keeps asking me "this web site wants to install Adobe Flash Player", and I want to get rid of this question. I don't want to install it, not now, not ever. So how do I make IE stop asking me about it?

    Read the article

  • Network is going down once per day

    - by Charly
    Once per day the network on eth0 is going down and we need to do sudo ifdown eth0; sudo ifup eth0 to get the network up. Here is the syslog: Feb 11 12:48:01 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of address> on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 12:52:35 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of address> on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 12:56:23 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of address> on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 13:00:28 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of address> on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 13:04:29 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of address> on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 13:09:16 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of address> on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 13:13:53 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of address> on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 13:18:16 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of address> on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 13:22:25 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of address> on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 13:26:52 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of address> on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 13:30:44 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of address> on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 13:31:49 www-tech-1 dhclient: There is already a pid file /var/run/dhclient.eth0.pid with pid 3198 Feb 11 13:31:49 www-tech-1 dhclient: Listening on LPF/eth0/00:e0:81:49:fc:e0 Feb 11 13:31:49 www-tech-1 dhclient: Sending on LPF/eth0/00:e0:81:49:fc:e0 Feb 11 13:31:49 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPRELEASE on eth0 to 131.121.113.228 port 67 Feb 11 13:31:49 www-tech-1 dhclient: There is already a pid file /var/run/dhclient.eth0.pid with pid 134519072 Feb 11 13:31:50 www-tech-1 dhclient: Listening on LPF/eth0/00:e0:81:49:fc:e0 Feb 11 13:31:50 www-tech-1 dhclient: Sending on LPF/eth0/00:e0:81:49:fc:e0 Feb 11 13:31:52 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8 Feb 11 13:31:52 www-tech-1 dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 131.121.14.17 on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 Feb 11 13:31:53 www-tech-1 kernel: [265383.991682] eth0: no IPv6 routers present Please check the last portion of this syslog. Can anybody help me?

    Read the article

  • Traceroute, * at first router

    - by Jérôme
    When using traceroute on my mac to check the path to any website, the first line is always 3 stars. imac:~ Jerome$ traceroute google.com traceroute: Warning: google.com has multiple addresses; using 173.194.70.113 traceroute to google.com (173.194.70.113), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets 1 * * * 2 217-168-54-101.static.cablecom.ch (217.168.54.101) 9.515 ms 8.757 ms 10.104 ms 3 172.31.208.73 (172.31.208.73) 14.512 ms 14.605 ms 14.264 ms 4 ch-zrh01b-ra1-ae-1.aorta.net (84.116.134.142) 13.587 ms 12.892 ms 13.936 ms 5 74.125.49.101 (74.125.49.101) 13.966 ms 14.850 ms 14.915 ms 6 72.14.232.120 (72.14.232.120) 26.573 ms 72.14.232.88 (72.14.232.88) 20.072 ms 19.758 ms 7 72.14.236.68 (72.14.236.68) 26.913 ms 72.14.236.20 (72.14.236.20) 26.825 ms 72.14.239.62 (72.14.239.62) 25.381 ms 8 209.85.254.118 (209.85.254.118) 22.240 ms 22.365 ms 209.85.254.112 (209.85.254.112) 24.826 ms 9 * * * 10 fa-in-f113.1e100.net (173.194.70.113) 25.715 ms 26.960 ms 25.191 ms As far as I know, * means no answer from the router. How come I have stars at the very first line ?

    Read the article

  • Why not open a PDF file in the browser but first save it to the harddisk?

    - by Lernkurve
    Question Is it correct that saving a PDF to the harddisk first, and then opening it from there with some PDF reader (not the browser) is safer than opening it directly with the browser plugin? My current understanding I know that the PDF browser plugin might have a security leak and a manipulated PDF file might exploit it and get access to the user's computer. I recently heard that saving the PDF file frist and opening it then was safer. I don't understand why that should be safer. Can anyone explain? My logic would suggest that a manipulated file started from the harddisk can just as well exploit a security leak, say for instance, of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

    Read the article

  • Avast Antivirus downloading data from net even when told not to update.

    - by Nathan W
    Hi all, This is a strange problem that I have never seen before. I have two machines, both running Win 7 and running the latest version of Avast, both seem to be downloading large amounts of data. I noticed it when we were using more data for our monthly limit then normal, 2gb+ in a couple of days when really only browsing. I installed NetLimiter and let it run for couple of hours and this is the result for the avast! Service (c:\program files\alwil software\avast5\avastsvc.exe ). The other computer downloaded twice as much data in the same amount of time. Both installs of avast have their automatic updates (turned off at 4:00pm), for both program and definitions. Does anyone know what might be going on here.

    Read the article

  • Network wide rule to forwared IP address

    - by Patrick
    Hi, we have a virtual machine which hosts a web based bug tracker in our network which is reached internally via e.g. 192.168.1.5:9800. From the outside we made a port forwarding in our firewall so that the web site can be reached via e.g. 72.10.10.10:9800. Now that works fine but the problem is that we got different IP addresses to reach the same service depending if we are in the office or at home and when the service sends out an email the link doesn't always work :) So we are looking for a solution to fix it. One could be to make a rule in out firewall that all communication to 72.10.10.10:9800 is forwarded to 192.168.1.5:9800... If that's possible that is considering it's an IP address + a port. The reason we used a port is because we only got one static public IP address but multiple virtual web appliances. Thanks for any suggestions or solutions :) Patrick PS: The network is a Win 2008 R2 domain by the way

    Read the article

  • How to prevent yourself from commenting on websites?

    - by MHH
    There is a bunch of browser add ons to either block particular websites (i.e. leechblock, chrome nanny or various OS specific solutions) or block the comment section of a website (i.e. commentBlocker). However, what if you want to be able to read the comment section of all websites, but want to never be able to add comments yourself, on particular sites? Is there anything that will allow this? I'm particularly interested in answers that will work for both windows and mac, and will also work for google chrome, firefox, and safari (note they can be different solutions for each browser/operating system)

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115  | Next Page >