Search Results

Search found 5827 results on 234 pages for 'chrome canary'.

Page 109/234 | < Previous Page | 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116  | Next Page >

  • Opera passe la barre symbolique des 100 millions d'utilisateurs et serait le troisième navigateur le

    Mise à jour du 12/04/10 [Les commentaires de cette mise à jour commencent ici] Opera passe la barre symbolique des 100 millions d'utilisateurs Et serait le troisième navigateur le plus utilisé en Europe devant Chrome Après avoir doublé ses téléchargements en Europe depuis l'arrivée du "Ballot Screen" sur Windows (lire ci-avant), Opera annonce aujourd'hui avoir passé la barre symbolique des 100 millions d'utilisateurs. Ce chiffre prend en compte toutes les versions du navigateur à...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft percevrait 2 milliards de dollars par an des licences Android, un revenu qui permettrait de masquer les pertes de la Xbox, selon un analyste

    Microsoft percevrait 2 milliards de dollars par an des licences Android un revenu qui permettrait de masquer les pertes de la Xbox, selon un analysteSelon un analyste, Microsoft gagnerait près de deux milliards de dollars par an avec Android. Un revenu provenant des redevances reçues des constructeurs Android pour utiliser son portefeuille de brevets sans être poursuivis.Depuis le lancement de son programme de licences Microsoft pour l'OS mobile Android et Chrome OS, Microsoft a signé des accords...

    Read the article

  • Fixya publie son rapport sur les navigateurs mobiles les plus utilisés, Safari en tête de liste

    Fixya publie son rapport sur les navigateurs mobiles les plus utilisés, Safari en tête de liste Malgré les 73,5% de part d'Android sur le marché du smartphone, une enquête de Fixya qui a comparé l'utilisation de cinq principales plateformes de navigation ( Internet -Google- , Chrome -Google-, Opera -Opera- , Explorer -Windows- et Safari -Apple- ) révèle que Safari est le navigateur mobile le plus utilisé. Avec plus de la moitié des parts d'utilisation (58,12%), le navigateur d'Apple se distingue...

    Read the article

  • Mozilla sort un SDK pour JetPack, la révolution est en marche dans le développement des extensions d

    Mozilla sort un SDK pour JetPack La révolution dans le développement des extensions de Firefox est en marche La Fondation Mozilla est consciente que l'arrivée de Chrome et de ses extensions - visiblement plus simples à créer - représente un danger pour sa communauté de développeurs. Elle n'a certes pas lancé le projet pour cela, mais JetPack devrait cependant l'aider à rester dans la course et à conserver son attrait. Pour mémoire JetPack est un pr...

    Read the article

  • Can't Drag & Drop text to unity launcher (e.g. url's, highlighted text)

    - by patsee
    I'm trying to create a unity launcher icon (.dekstop file) on which you can drop any (selected/highlighted) text from a web browser, google chrome in my case. I know you can use the "MimeType=" key in a .desktop file, but I can't find the right mime type for my scenario. I've tried several text MimeTypes and "text/*", but none of them would work. Does anyone know which MimeType I have to use in order for my launcher icon to accept text when hovering over it?

    Read the article

  • Le succès de Windows 7 se confirme en entreprise et présage une adoption rapide et massive, selon Fo

    Mise à jour du 27/05/10 Le succès de Windows 7 se confirme en entreprise Et présage une adoption rapide et massive, selon Forrester Nouvelle étude à 500 $ pour le cabinet Forrester... qui accepte néanmoins de livrer quelques conclusions pour 0 Euro. « Corporate Desktop Operating System And Browser Trends, Q2 2009 To Q2 2010 » nous apprend donc que Windows 7 arrive (sic) et que Firefox et Chrome ne cessent de progresser (une constatation déjà fait...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft rejette le standard WebGL jugé "dangereux" suite à la découverte de multiples failles critiques sur Firefox

    Microsoft rejette le standard WebGL jugé « dangereux » Suite à la découverte de multiples failles critiques sur Firefox L'avenir du standard WebGL sur Internet Explorer s'annonce très incertain. Microsoft rejette ce standard d'affichage 3D pour le Web, au moins dans sa forme actuelle qu'il juge « dangereuse » dans une dépêche faisant suite à la découverte de plusieurs nouvelles failles critiques sur l'implémentation de Mozilla Firefox. Des failles qui pourraient être présentes sur Google Chrome également. Sur le blog de recherche en sécurité et défense, l'équipe MSRC de Redmond affirme que « le support de WebGL dans les navigateurs ...

    Read the article

  • Internet Explorer 9 Released: Here’s What You Need To Know

    - by The Geek
    Microsoft has released the final version of Internet Explorer 9, and there’s just one question you should be asking yourself: Should I bother installing it? Here’s everything you need to know about the latest release of Microsoft’s infamous browser. Spoiler alert: If you are running Windows 7 or Vista, you should absolutely install IE9 on your PC—even if you prefer Chrome or Firefox, it’s better to have a secure, updated version of Internet Explorer.Internet Explorer 9 Released: Here’s What You Need To KnowHTG Explains: How Does Email Work?How To Make a Youtube Video Into an Animated GIF

    Read the article

  • Des serveurs du site officiel de PHP ont été compromis, un nouveau coup dur dans le domaine de la sécurité

    Des serveurs du site officiel de PHP ont été compromis, un nouveau coup dur dans le domaine de la sécurité Si vous avez essayé de vous connecter sur le site officiel de PHP avant hier, vous aurez sans doute lu le message d'alerte indiquant que le site contient un logiciel malveillant. La découverte a été faite jeudi dernier par le service de navigation sécurisée de Google qui aide les Chrome, Firefox, et Safari à bloquer automatiquement les sites dont les serveurs ont été infectés par des...

    Read the article

  • Firefox 30 sort en version stable et désactive par défaut l'exécution des plugins, la version Android également disponible

    Firefox 30 sort en version stable et désactive par défaut l'exécution des plugins, la version Android également disponibleMozilla met à la disposition des utilisateurs, une nouvelle version de son navigateur Firefox. Contrairement à la version 29 qui était sortie avec un lot de nouveautés, notamment sa nouvelle interface utilisateur Australis, Firefox 30 représente une mise à jour mineure.Tout comme Google avec Chrome, Mozilla prend également des distances avec les plugins qui représentent (ceux...

    Read the article

  • Which browsers handle `Content-Encoding: gzip` and which of them has any special requirements on encodinq quality?

    - by user1049847
    I am creating a "hand made" HTTP 1/0, 1/1 server. I recently integrated zip lib so now I can stream encoded gziped data in and out. I wonder Which major browsers (alive ones - IE6-IE10, Chrome, FF, etc) send Accept-Encoding: deflate, gzip, ... and so can handle Content-Encoding: gzip today? Which of them send any quality expectations? Which of them can send encoded gziped post request and multypart/form data to my server?

    Read the article

  • Iframe scrolls over the fixed header in IE 11 , how to make it scroll under/behind the header?

    - by Ram
    In my html page, I have a header and its position is fixed. In the contant or body of the page I have an Iframe to display a youtube video and other DIV tabs. In other browsers like chrome, Morzilla etc all the contants schrolls behind the header and works fine!!. But In IE (IE 11), only the youtube video in Iframe scrolls over/aboves the header. How can I make it to scroll behind the header in IE. Thank in advance

    Read the article

  • 5 Browsers You've Never Heard Of

    <b>Linux & All:</b> "Over the past few years many different browsers have been created and become very popular for example Mozilla Firefox and Google Chrome, however, there are many browsers which are generally unheard of among the majority of web users. Here are 5 of them"

    Read the article

  • A CLR-supporting browser (4 replies)

    Microsoft, by seemingly ignoring the huge benefits of JIT compiling VMs on the browser and instead pushing Silverlight (which is pretty awesome though), is showing it STILL hasn't gotten the Web. (The fact that I can't seem to post on these newsgroups using Firefox (!!!) is yet another glaring example) What is so ironic is that it has a golden chance to leapfrog Chrome without even reinventing any...

    Read the article

  • Why is firefox 4 not HW accelerated?

    - by acidzombie24
    At first i thought it was my computer but then i tried chrome. Why isnt firefox not hardware accelerated? The first screenshot shows chrome at 23% usage. The 2nd shows 59%. I have 2 cpus which is why it isnt 100% usage. The game pictured is biolab Heres the text for about:support Application Basics Name Firefox Version 4.0 User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0 Profile Directory Open Containing Folder Enabled Plugins about:plugins Build Configuration about:buildconfig Extensions Name Version Enabled ID Modified Preferences Name Value accessibility.typeaheadfind.flashBar 0 browser.places.importBookmarksHTML false browser.places.smartBookmarksVersion 2 browser.startup.homepage_override.buildID 20110303194838 browser.startup.homepage_override.mstone rv:2.0 extensions.lastAppVersion 4.0 gfx.font_rendering.directwrite.enabled true network.cookie.prefsMigrated true places.history.expiration.transient_current_max_pages 127602 privacy.sanitize.migrateFx3Prefs true Graphics Adapter Description Mobile Intel(R) 4 Series Express Chipset Family Vendor ID 8086 Device ID 2a42 Adapter RAM Unknown Adapter Drivers igdumd64 igd10umd64 igdumdx32 igd10umd32 Driver Version 8.15.10.2202 Driver Date 8-25-2010 Direct2D Enabled true DirectWrite Enabled true (6.1.7600.16385, font cache n/a) WebGL Renderer Google Inc. -- ANGLE -- OpenGL ES 2.0 (ANGLE 0.0.0.541) GPU Accelerated Windows 1/1 Direct3D 10

    Read the article

  • This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your

    - by WebDude
    I am having a highly annoying problem on Windows 7 with Microsoft Outlook 2007. Whenever I click on any hyperlinks I am present with the message This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effect on this computer. Please contact your system administrator and let's not forget the most ear-piecing "DING" to accompany this wonderful informative message. Now I have searched the web high and low for a solution here and most sources suggest the same solution of resetting your IE as your default browser. Tried .. failed A lot of sources suggest this has something to do with installing and uninstalling chrome. I have never installed Chrome but am actually consdering this to see if it by some chance fixes my computer. A lot of sources also point to a microsoft kb article 325478 which is focused around Windows XP and totally unrelated to my problem. I see there are some other queries on SuperUser with no resolution. Please can someone help solve this highly annoying issue. I am running Window 7 professional x64 Microsoft Office 2007 Microsoft Security Essentials Running in a windows work group with default policy settings HELP!

    Read the article

  • apache Client Certificate Authentication errors: Certificate Verification: Error (18): self signed certificate

    - by decoy
    So I have been following instructions on setting up Client Certificate Authentication in Apache2 w/ mod_ssl. This is solely for the purpose of testing an application against CAA, not for any sort of production use. So far I've followed http://www.impetus.us/~rjmooney/projects/misc/clientcertauth.html for advice on generating my CA, server, and client encryption information. I've put all three of them into /etc/ssl/ca/private. I've setup the following additional directives in my default_ssl site file: <IfModule mod_ssl.c> <VirtualHost _default_:443> ... SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/ca/private/server.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/ca/private/server.key SSLVerifyClient require SSLVerifyDepth 2 SSLCACertificatePath /etc/ssl/ca/private SSLCACertificateFile /etc/ssl/ca/private/ca.crt <Location /> SSLRequireSSL SSLVerifyClient require SSLVerifyDepth 2 </Location> <FilesMatch "\.(cgi|shtml|phtml|php)$"> SSLOptions +StdEnvVars </FilesMatch> <Directory /usr/lib/cgi-bin> SSLOptions +StdEnvVars </Directory> ... </VirtualHost> </IfModule> I've install the p12 file into Chrome, but when I go to visit https://localhost, I get the following errors Chrome: Error 107 (net::ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR): SSL protocol error. Apache: Certificate Verification: Error (18): self signed certificate If I had to guess, one of my directives is not setup right to load and verify the p12 w/ my self created CA. But I can't for the life of me figure out what it is. Would anyone have more experience here who could point me in the right direction?

    Read the article

  • How to Apache SSL proxy to openerp 7 running in VM?

    - by Johnbritto
    I have installed openerp v7 in an ubuntu 12.04 Virtual machine from launchpad.i.e server, web, addons. I configured SSL reverse proxy on virtual machine and my configuration for virtual host *:443 are ServerName openerp.mydomain.net ServerAdmin openerp@localhost SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/openerp/server.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/openerp/server.key ProxyRequests Off ProxyPreserveHost On <Proxy *> Order deny,allow Allow from all </Proxy> ProxyVia On ProxyPass / http://172.16.150.14:8069/ ProxyPassReverse / http://172.16.150.14:8069/ RequestHeader set "X-Forwarded-Proto" "https" # Fix IE problem (httpapache proxy dav error 408/409) SetEnv proxy-nokeepalive 1 </VirtualHost> on host, I have configured apache reverse proxy for my subdomain in vhost_ssl.conf as SSLEngine On SSLProxyEngine On ProxyRequests Off ProxyPreserveHost On <Proxy *> Order deny,allow Allow from all </Proxy> ProxyPass / https://172.16.150.14/ ProxyPassReverse / https://172.16.150.14/ SetEnv proxy-nokeepalive 1 <Location /> Order allow,deny Allow from all </Location> I have set 172.16.150.14 on netrpc and xmlrcs interfaces in openerp-server.conf. Now, when I access https:// openerp.mydomain.net from Girefox and chrome browser..I get http:// openerp.mydomain.net%2C%20openerp.mydomain.net/?db=testingdb which makes 404. But when i access URL from IE 9, the URL https:// openerp.mydomain.net works ok .. secondly if i change the parameter list_db= false, then the links works as expected.. Kindly let me know what is creating bottleneck with URL redirect to http://openerp.mydomain.net, openerp.myydomain.net/?db=testdb on Firefox and chrome. i am struck here doing troubleshooting with the URL to work.

    Read the article

  • Why do I have untrusted certificates for Google, Yahoo, Mozilla and others?

    - by jackweirdy
    In the HTTPS/SSL section of chrome://chrome/settings, I see the following: What does this mean, and is there something wrong? I have a basic understanding of SSL/TLS - I'm not claiming to be completely familiar, but I'm fairly confident I know my way around it - but I don't understand why I have certificates installed on my machine specifically for these sites. From my understanding, I should have the certificates for Certificate Authorities, and any site I visit and use SSL/TLS should have a certificate signed by one of these trusted CAs for me to trust the site. My worry is that if someone has maliciously installed a certificate for these sites on my machine, they could perform a DNS spoofing attack (or a number of other attacks) to hijack my connection to my email account without me knowing, and as they've got the private counterpart to the certificate on my machine, decrypt the communication. NB: I'm also aware that CA certificates aren't just within Chromium and are used system wide as part of libssl - they're stored in /etc/ssl/certs. What I'd like to know is: Is this correct? - The big red boxes make me think no Is this malicious or benign? What can I do to resolve this problem? (If indeed it is a problem) Thanks :)

    Read the article

  • Xorg eating up too much RAM on Ubuntu 9.10 box

    - by Yang
    Xorg is eating up 444MB of 2GB total RAM on my Ubuntu 9.10 x86_64 machine with nvidia drivers installed for the nvidia G86 (GeForce 8300 GS). top shows: top - 18:21:41 up 6 days, 2:40, 9 users, load average: 0.46, 1.12, 1.22 Tasks: 266 total, 3 running, 262 sleeping, 1 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 8.4%us, 2.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 89.1%id, 0.5%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 2055736k total, 1965136k used, 90600k free, 3952k buffers Swap: 979924k total, 979908k used, 16k free, 102636k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1432 root 20 0 1154m 442m 7492 S 8 22.0 32:56.97 Xorg 18462 yang 20 0 1001m 219m 8356 S 0 10.9 5:13.25 chrome 24099 yang 20 0 865m 83m 13m S 0 4.2 0:06.91 chrome xrestop shows: xrestop - Display: :0.0 Monitoring 47 clients. XErrors: 0 Pixmaps: 40430K total, Other: 142K total, All: 40573K total res-base Wins GCs Fnts Pxms Misc Pxm mem Other Total PID Identifier 1c00000 21 46 1 19 697 9128K 18K 9146K 3169 x-nautilus-desktop 1000000 4 3 0 17 194 9000K 4K 9004K 3134 gnome-settings-daemon 1600000 51 2 1 25 1100 7648K 28K 7676K ? compiz For comparison, here's my other Ubuntu box, which also has compiz etc. enabled but with ATI RV370 (Radeon X300SE): top - 18:18:18 up 58 days, 4:27, 9 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 Tasks: 224 total, 1 running, 223 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 0.3%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 98.8%id, 0.5%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 1024964k total, 987124k used, 37840k free, 247012k buffers Swap: 2048276k total, 94296k used, 1953980k free, 264744k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 24324 yang 20 0 61936 35m 6364 S 0 3.5 4:35.84 nxagent 1768 ntop 20 0 190m 32m 5388 S 1 3.2 283:36.15 ntop 1178 root 20 0 60588 29m 1788 S 0 3.0 5:48.89 console-kit-dae ... 1315 root 20 0 343m 4956 4020 S 0 0.5 3:43.87 Xorg Any ideas on how to get to the bottom of this? (i.e. not "Log out"/"Reboot") Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • How do I prevent or override a group policy on Windows 7?

    - by Kevin
    A few months ago my company was purchased by a large corporation. We recently switched our network over to the large corporate network which has more restrictions requirements. One of these is the requirement to use a proxy server for Internet traffic. However, some of our internal servers are not recognized by the corporate DNS, so we need to provide the fully qualified domain name. For W7, we make changes to the Internet Properties for IE8 and Chrome to include our domain name as an exception to the proxy server (e.g., *.foobar.com). The problem is that a group policy that does not include our domain name is continually pushed out to my systems throughout the day. This requires me to make the appropriate changes to the Internet Properties several times a day in order to access our internal servers. Is there a way that I can prevent the group policy from being pushed to my systems or detect when the group policy is pushed and override it? I am an administrator on all of my systems. I do have Firefox installed which is not subject to the same group policy push, but I need to have IE8 and Chrome working.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116  | Next Page >