Search Results

Search found 18661 results on 747 pages for 'linq to mysql'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 109/747 | < Previous Page | 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116  | Next Page >

  • switch linq syntax

    - by scrat789
    var folders = from r in this.bdd.Rights join f in this.bdd.Folders on r.RightFolderId equals f.FolderId join rs in this.bdd.RightSpecs on r.RightSpecId equals rs.SpecIdRight where r.RightUserId == userId where rs.SpecRead == true where rs.SpecWrite == true select f; How transform this linq query in the other syntax? var folders = this.bdd.Rights.Where(r => r.....

    Read the article

  • Sequential GUID in Linq-to-Sql?

    - by JacobE
    I just read a blog post about NHibernate's ability to create a GUID from the system time (Guid.Comb), thus avoiding a good amount of database fragmentation. You could call it the client-side equivalent to the SQL Server Sequential ID. Is there a way I could use a similar strategy in my Linq-to-Sql project (by generating the Guid in code)?

    Read the article

  • Linq Expression Trees in Compact Framework.

    - by Michal Drozdowicz
    The lack of expression trees in Compact Framework has bugged me for some time now, but I haven't really looked for a solution. Today, I've found a blog post about an alternative System.Linq.Expressions built on top of Mono System.Core and used e.g. by db4o (you can find it here). My question is - have you used this library and if so, what were your experiences with it (especially regarding performance)?

    Read the article

  • How are attached properties useful in LINQ?

    - by James Cadd
    I got this question during an interview in the past and never really dug into in, but I've put some thought into it lately and I can't come up with a good answer. When I think of attached properties my mind goes straight to UI related concepts - what benefits could be had in using attached properties with LINQ? I'm starting to think the answer is "they're not" unless I find out otherwise!

    Read the article

  • Dynamically set sproc name in Linq to SQL?

    - by Justin
    Hey, I need to dynamically set the sproc name of a Linq to SQL query and can't figure out how. I see in the dbml designer that the sproc name is an attribute but it must be a constant, so I can't set it to a dynamic value. Please help. Thanks, Justin

    Read the article

  • NHibernate LINQ + PLINQ

    - by cvista
    Hi i've just started reading up on PLINQ and find it fasinating. I'm using NHib-Linq in my projects - does anyone know if there's any benefit/problems using PLINQ type queries with NHLinq? w://

    Read the article

  • Help With LINQ: Mixed Joins and Specifying Default Values

    - by Corey O.
    I am trying to figure out how to do a mixed-join in LINQ with specific access to 2 LINQ objects. Here is an example of how the actual TSQL query might look: SELECT * FROM [User] AS [a] INNER JOIN [GroupUser] AS [b] ON [a].[UserID] = [b].[UserID] INNER JOIN [Group] AS [c] ON [b].[GroupID] = [c].[GroupID] LEFT JOIN [GroupEntries] AS [d] ON [a].[GroupID] = [d].[GroupID] WHERE [a].[UserID] = @UserID At the end, basically what I would like is an enumerable object full of GroupEntry objects. What am interested is the last two tables/objects in this query. I will be displaying Groups as a group header, and all of the Entries underneath their group heading. If there are no entries for a group, I still want to see that group as a header without any entries. Here's what I have so far: So from that I'd like to make a function: public void DisplayEntriesByUser(int user_id) { MyDataContext db = new MyDataContext(); IEnumberable<GroupEntries> entries = ( from user in db.Users where user.UserID == user_id join group_user in db.GroupUsers on user.UserID = group_user.UserID into a from join1 in a join group in db.Groups on join1.GroupID equals group.GroupID into b from join2 in b join entry in db.Entries.DefaultIfEmpty() on join2.GroupID equals entry.GroupID select entry ); Group last_group_id = 0; foreach(GroupEntry entry in entries) { if (last_group_id == 0 || entry.GroupID != last_group_id) { last_group_id = entry.GroupID; System.Console.WriteLine("---{0}---", entry.Group.GroupName.ToString().ToUpper()); } if (entry.EntryID) { System.Console.WriteLine(" {0}: {1}", entry.Title, entry.Text); } } } The example above does not work quite as expected. There are 2 problems that I have not been able to solve: I still seem to be getting an INNER JOIN instead of a LEFT JOIN on the last join. I am not getting any empty results, so groups without entries do not appear. I need to figure out a way so that I can fill in the default values for blank sets of entries. That is, if there is a group without an entry, I would like to have a mostly blank entry returned, except that I'd want the EntryID to be null or 0, the GroupID to be that of of the empty group that it represents, and I'd need a handle on the entry.Group object (i.e. it's parent, empty Group object). Any help on this would be greatly appreciated. Note: Table names and real-world representation were derived purely for this example, but their relations simplify what I'm trying to do.

    Read the article

  • List to Columns in LINQ

    - by Sam Saffron
    Given an IEnumerable<T> and row count, I would like to convert it to an IEnumerable<IEnumerable<T>> like so: Input: Row Count: 3 List: [1,2,3,4,5,6,7] Output [ [1,4,7] [2,5] [3,6] ] How can I do this using LINQ?

    Read the article

  • Linq Queries converting to lambda expressions ?

    - by Freshblood
    Hello from item in range where item % 2 ==0 select i ; is converting to lamda expressions as below range.where(item % 2 ==0).select(x=>x). I feel that first way of linq is translating next one and if it is ,so is there any optimization like this range.where(item & 2 == 0) instead of other one ?

    Read the article

  • Instantiate defined object with Linq Query

    - by Heinz
    I know that you can instantiate anonymous types with Linq but I am looking to instantiate an object I have already defined. Every time I do, all the properties are returned with their defaults (null, 0, etc.) Is there a way to make this work? I've tried something like this: ServiceDepartment[] serviceDepartments = (from d in departments orderby d.department_name select new ServiceDepartment { DepartmentID = d.department_id, DepartmentName = d.department_name }).ToArray();

    Read the article

  • LINQ problem on remote machine

    - by HaMMeR
    I am using LINQ expressions in my code like this var obj = Collection.Single(collection = (collection.ShortName.Equals("AAA"))); The problem is that this line works fine for me, no problems. But when I upload the same executable to some remote machine with same 32 bit Windows XP. The code execution is just stopping at this line of source. Can anyone help me.

    Read the article

  • Linq to SQL - Returning two values with one query

    - by Sir Psycho
    Hi, Is it possible to return a single value and an enumerable collection using LINQ to SQL? The problem is, I'm trying to do paging across a large recordset. I only want to return 10 rows at a time so I'm using .Skip(20).Take(10) approach. However I need to know the total number of records so I can show an appropriate page x of y. Trying to avoid two separate queries. Thanks

    Read the article

  • how can i pass parameter to linq query

    - by girish
    i want to pass parameter to linq query... public IEnumerable GetPhotos() { PhotoDBDataContext db = new PhotoDBDataContext(); var tProduct = db.Photos; var query = from p in db.Photos orderby p.PhotoId descending select new { p.Album, p.AlbumId, p.Description, p.Photographer, p.PhotographerId, p.PhotoId, p.Tags, p.Thumbnail, p.Url }; return query; } in above example "orderby p.PhotoId descending" is used, i want to use parameter in place of p.PhotoId is it possible...

    Read the article

  • T-SQL generated from LINQ to SQL is missing a where clause

    - by Jimmy W
    I have extended some functionality to a DataContext object (called "CodeLookupAccessDataContext") such that the object exposes some methods to return results of LINQ to SQL queries. Here are the methods I have defined: public List<CompositeSIDMap> lookupCompositeSIDMap(int regionId, int marketId) { var sidGroupId = CompositeSIDGroupMaps.Where(x => x.RegionID.Equals(regionId) && x.MarketID.Equals(marketId)) .Select(x => x.CompositeSIDGroup); IEnumerator<int> sidGroupIdEnum = sidGroupId.GetEnumerator(); if (sidGroupIdEnum.MoveNext()) return lookupCodeInfo<CompositeSIDMap, CompositeSIDMap>(x => x.CompositeSIDGroup.Equals(sidGroupIdEnum.Current), x => x); else return null; } private List<TResult> lookupCodeInfo<T, TResult>(Func<T, bool> compLambda, Func<T, TResult> selectLambda) where T : class { System.Data.Linq.Table<T> dataTable = this.GetTable<T>(); var codeQueryResult = dataTable.Where(compLambda) .Select(selectLambda); List<TResult> codeList = new List<TResult>(); foreach (TResult row in codeQueryResult) codeList.Add(row); return codeList; } CompositeSIDGroupMap and CompositeSIDMap are both tables in our database that are represented as objects in my DataContext object. I wrote the following code to call these methods and display the T-SQL generated after calling these methods: using (CodeLookupAccessDataContext codeLookup = new CodeLookupAccessDataContext()) { codeLookup.Log = Console.Out; List<CompositeSIDMap> compList = codeLookup.lookupCompositeSIDMap(5, 3); } I got the following results in my log after invoking this code: SELECT [t0].[CompositeSIDGroup] FROM [dbo].[CompositeSIDGroupMap] AS [t0] WHERE ([t0].[RegionID] = @p0) AND ([t0].[MarketID] = @p1) -- @p0: Input Int (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [5] -- @p1: Input Int (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [3] -- Context: SqlProvider(Sql2005) Model: AttributedMetaModel Build: 3.5.30729.1 SELECT [t0].[PK_CSM], [t0].[CompositeSIDGroup], [t0].[InputSID], [t0].[TargetSID], [t0].[StartOffset], [t0].[EndOffset], [t0].[Scale] FROM [dbo].[CompositeSIDMap] AS [t0] -- Context: SqlProvider(Sql2005) Model: AttributedMetaModel Build: 3.5.30729.1 The first T-SQL statement contains a where clause as specified and returns one column as expected. However, the second statement is missing a where clause and returns all columns, even though I did specify which rows I wanted to view and which columns were of interest. Why is the second T-SQL statement generated the way it is, and what should I do to ensure that I filter out the data according to specifications via the T-SQL? Also note that I would prefer to keep lookupCodeInfo() and especially am interested in keeping it enabled to accept lambda functions for specifying which rows/columns to return.

    Read the article

  • LINQ 2 SQL:Left outer join for my SQL statement

    - by Shyju
    Can any one tell me the LINQ 2 SQL version (in vb.net) of the below Left outer join query.I am trying to get all Employees with name "Shyju" and their address line 1 if it exist in the address table SELECT E.EMPLOYEE_NAME, E.AGE,A.ADRESS_LINE1 FROM EMPLOYEE_MASTER E LEFT OUTER JOIN ADDRESS_MASTER A ON E.ID=A.EMPLOYEE_ID WHERE E.EMPLOYEE_NAME='Shyju' Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Linq to Entity Dynamic where clause

    - by GodSmart
    I have Linq to Entity query like you can see below I am using it five times in my code, everything that change is where clause. is it possible to create a method and pass just where values, not to write all code five times. Thank you items = from t1 in _entities.table1 join t2 in _entities.Table2 on t1.column1 equals t2.column1 join t3 in _entities.Table3 on t1.column2 equals t3.column2 join t4 in _entities.Table4 on t1.column3 equals t4.column3 where **t1.column5 == Something** select new { t1.column7, t2.column8, t3.column9, t4.column10 };

    Read the article

  • VB.Net Linq Datatable Exists

    - by LarsH
    I would like to use Linq instead of below function : Friend Function IsCollectionInTable2(ByVal apps As DataTable, ByVal collectionId As String) As Boolean For Each row As DataRow In apps.Rows If row("CollectionId").ToString = collectionId Then Return True Next Return False End Function The best I can do is below: Friend Function IsCollectionInTable(ByVal apps As DataTable, ByVal collectionId As String) As Boolean Return (From row In apps.AsEnumerable() Where (row.Field(Of String)("CollectionId") = collectionId) Select row.Field(Of String)("CollectionId")).Count > 0 End Function I would like to use Exists or Any in above function. Performance could be an issue,

    Read the article

  • NHibernate Linq Provider question

    - by csizo
    Can anyone answer me what are the differences of Session.Query Session.Linq and Session.QueryOver What I'm really interested in: What would be supported in the future versions. What should I start to use in a clean project. Please tell me your thoughts about these three... Thanks, Zoltán

    Read the article

  • Which is more flexible in regards to database changes, EF 4 or Linq to SQL

    - by JBeckton
    Reading about both Linq to SQL and Entity Framework I have developed the impression that EF is more suitable for apps that get data from multiple data sources. But as I am reading about MVC2 models I see an example where EF is more loosely coupled with your data model. If I have to add or remove some columns from a table then what is involved in updating my model or DAL with each of these implementations?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116  | Next Page >