Search Results

Search found 10789 results on 432 pages for 'cpu upgrade'.

Page 11/432 | < Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >

• How much faster is a 64bit CPU than 32bit CPU? [closed]

  - by W.N.

  I just need the result in theory. I'm not an expert in computer architecture, just a software developer. Most of my friends think 64bit-CPU is 2 times faster than 32bit-CPU. But I think 64-CPU is 2 ^ 2 = 4 times faster than 32bit-CPU (in theory). Which is the right answer to this question? And, if there were 128bit-CPU, how many times would it faster than a 32bit-CPU? PS: I searched with Google, and found a link that referred to benchmarks that supported my answer. I've seen a benchmark where 64bit was 4x faster but that was with a particular encryption where the extra registers available made the difference

  Read the article

• I can't upgrade 13.10 because of broken pipe

  - by user212179

  I try upgrading and this is what I get: christopher@chris-computer:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade [sudo] password for christopher: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: librhythmbox-core7 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B/809 kB of archives. After this operation, 39.9 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y (Reading database ... 170617 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace librhythmbox-core7 2.99.1-0ubuntu1 (using .../librhythmbox-core7_3.0.1-0~13.10~ppa1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement librhythmbox-core7 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/librhythmbox-core7_3.0.1-0~13.10~ppa1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/librhythmbox-core.so.8.0.0', which is also in package librhythmbox-core8 3.0.1-1ubuntu2~ppa0 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/librhythmbox-core7_3.0.1-0~13.10~ppa1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

  Read the article

• not able to upgrade maas to 1.4?

  - by SaM

  I am running ubuntu 13.04 LTS, and maas version runnung is maas 1.3+bzr1470+dfsg-0+1474+175~ppa0~ubuntu13.04.1, so i'm trying to upgrade it to mass 1.4 but its failing, sam@xsmaas01:~$ sudo apt-get install maas [sudo] password for sam: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: maas 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 87 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/1,912 B of archives. After this operation, 1,024 B of additional disk space will be used. (Reading database ... 85268 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace maas 1.3+bzr1470+dfsg-0+1474+175~ppa0~ubuntu13.04.1 (using .../maas_1.4+bzr1693+dfsg-0ubuntu2~ctools0_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement maas ... Setting up maas-cluster-controller (1.4+bzr1693+dfsg-0ubuntu2~ctools0) ... ERROR: Module version does not exist! dpkg: error processing maas-cluster-controller (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of maas: maas depends on maas-cluster-controller; however: Package maas-cluster-controller is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing maas (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: maas-cluster-controller maas E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) sam@maas01:~$ Can anyone help me with this?

  Read the article

• probability of trouble-free upgrade

  - by intuited

  One of the problems with recommending Ubuntu to potential future users, especially those not particularly given to technical endeavours, is that there is a chance that upgrades will break their machine, and they'll have to pay or otherwise coerce some knowledgeable person into fixing them. In my limited experience of running successive versions of Ubuntu since 8-something on a couple of different laptops, this chance is quite high. I'm not sure if I'm just unlucky with the hardware that I'm using, or if it's a result of the higher-than-average number of packages I have installed, or if upgrades are just typically problematic. So I'd like to know the likelihood, for a casual user, of doing a release upgrade, for example from 10.04 to 10.10, without experiencing any regression bugs. Obviously this is dependent on the hardware that people are running. Canonical seems to be making some efforts towards collecting data on this, for example with the "I am affected by this bug" checkbox on their issue tracker, and with the laptop compatibility reports, but I've not seen anything comprehensive. I'm hoping for an objective reference here, for example a study carried out by relatively unbiased individuals. However, anecdotal evidence is probably useful too.

  Read the article

• Upgrade from 11.04 to 12.04 failed - unable to login

  - by Tobias M.

  Yesterday i updgraded from 10.04 to 12.04 via the update-manager. At the end it said "Failed to upgrade due to too many errors". Before that i got a lot of error messages that said packages could ne configured - they were all related to mono. Then it force me to restart. When booting now, I see the pink screen (without logo). After that it turns black and the cursor appears. Then its falshing around between beeing bright and dark and showing the cursor and not showing it. But no way i see the login-screen. At the moment i am not able to boot frm usb since my usb device is too large to be formated to FAT-32 (8GB). This all is happening on this machine: AMD E-350 Processor (2x1,65Ghz) 4GB DDR3 RAM 320GB SATA II Hard drive AMD® Radeon™ HD 6320 Thanks in advance to everyone who trys helping me ;) I have to continue working with data from this machine so i´d be pleased to get my data accessible. Greets ;)

  Read the article

• unable to upgrade to 12.10 beta 2 from 12.04 [closed]

  - by user85959

  Possible Duplicate: There's an issue with an Alpha/Beta Release of Ubuntu, what should I do? authenticate 'quantal.tar.gz' against 'quantal.tar.gz.gpg' exception from gpg: GnuPG exited non-zero, with code 2 Debug information: gpg: Signature made Fri 28 Sep 2012 03:55:55 AM IST using DSA key ID 437D05B5 gpg: /tmp/update-manager-bpIptI/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created gpg: Good signature from "Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key " gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 6302 39CC 130E 1A7F D81A 27B1 4097 6EAF 437D 05B5 gpg: Signature made Fri 28 Sep 2012 03:55:55 AM IST using RSA key ID C0B21F32 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/UpdateManager/UpdateManager.py", line 1110, in on_button_dist_upgrade_clicked fetcher.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/DistUpgradeFetcherCore.py", line 253, in run _("Authenticating the upgrade failed. There may be a problem " File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/UpdateManager/DistUpgradeFetcher.py", line 41, in error return error(self.window_main, summary, message) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/UpdateManager/Core/utils.py", line 384, in error d.window.set_functions(Gdk.FUNC_MOVE) RuntimeError: unable to get the value gpg: /tmp/tmplqoLDu/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created

  Read the article

• Failing to upgrade to linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic

  - by Dan Lee

  When I try to upgrade linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic I get following problems: dpkg-deb (subprocess): data: internal bzip2 read error: 'DATA_ERROR' dpkg-deb: error: subprocess <decompress> returned error exit status 2 dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic_3.0.0-26.42_amd64.deb (--unpack): short read on buffer copy for backend dpkg-deb during `./lib/modules/3.0.0-26-generic/kernel/drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic.ko' No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.0.0-26-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-26-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.0.0-26-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-26-generic Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic_3.0.0-26.42_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-generic: linux-image-generic depends on linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic; however: Package linux-image-3.0.0-26-generic is not installed. I don't know why this happens to me; earlier upgrades always worked without problems. Does anybody know how to fix this?

  Read the article

• Partial upgrade on 12.04, how to stop nagging after locking to a working NVIDIA & xorg

  - by alsk

  How to stop the upgrade manager from offering updates and upgrades that potentially would harm my working 2D and 3D graphics? Finally, I got 12.04 working as it should: with nvidia-173 drivers by downgrading xorg and locking the version: On my 32-bit system on Athlon64, with (Albatron) NVIDIA GeForce FX5700XT, locked (/pinned) to xorg 1:7.6-7ubuntu7, xserver-xorg-core 2:11.1-0obuntu10.07, nvidia-173 173.14.35-0ubuntu0.2? An annoying thing left is that every time the updates are checked, I get warning of partial updates, and ambiguous options of "partial update" and "close". Ambiguous in that sense that if I click close, I will get option to update a few packages, which has been OK, while "partial update" would like to update my kernel to 3.2, alter xorg, remove nvidia-173 etc., and update mesa etc. This is not what I call appropriate, after locking XORG and NVIDIA drivers to working ones. One may say according to package management logic it may be correct, but to me as an user it makes little sense. Last Ubuntu that worked without big mess for me was 10.10, hence I will not put 12.10 to my "production" system, until I can be sure it will not trash the system again. P.S. Is there a recommended way to keep NVIDIA GeForce FX working with 3D on Ubuntu... in future?

  Read the article

• chrome memory and cpu footprint

  - by nmizar

  I've searched the forums for an answer but I couldn't find quite the answer I was looking for [1] , so I thought I it could as well be of interest to more people around here. I carry out a big part of my job on the browser (or for the browser, if you want to put it that way). I tend to use Chrome, because it's got natively many of the newest features that I need (DevTools stuff, mainly but not only). BTW, I'm usually running the last available Chrome version/build on a desktop Vaio with 4GB RAM and dual core CPU and Ubuntu 12.04 as distro and Gnome as window manager. So, I was curious about a) why does Chrome spawn so many threads even opening only three of four tabs and b) is there any way to allocate more memory to Chrome to prevent its performance from degrading? Thanks in advance, Nacho PS [1] I found threads about Chrome freezing or running out of memory but not about the reasons for this being so or for avoiding it to happen. PPS Of course, I could always buy a newer and more capable machine and that is exactly what I'm trying to evaluate: is this a question of outdated hardware or the problem will keep appearing on any (decently but not hugely sized) machine?

  Read the article

• Terminal closing itself after 14.04 upgrade

  - by David

  All was fine in 12.04, in this case I'm using virtualbox in Windows. Last days the warning message about my Ubuntu version no longer being supported was coming up pretty often, so, yesterday I finally decided to upgrade. The upgrading process ran ok, no errors, no warnings. After rebooting the errors started to happen. Just after booting up there were some errors about video, gnome, and video textures (sorry I didn't care in that moment so I don't remember well). Luckly that went away after installing VirtualBox additions. But the big problem here is that I can't use the terminal. It opens Ok when pressing control+alt+t, but most of the commands cause instant closing. For example, df, ls, mv, cd... usually work, although it has closed few times. But 'find' causes instant close. 'apt-get' update kills it too, just after it gets the package list from the sources, when it starts processing them. I've tried xterm, everything works and I have none of that problems. I have tried reinstalling konsole, bash-static, bash-completion, but nothing worked. I have no idea what to do as there is no error message to search for the cause. It seems something related to bash, but that's all I know.

  Read the article

• Upgrade went wrong, laptop essentially 'bricked'

  - by hexagonheat

  I have an old netbook I was trying to upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10. Ubuntu was in the process of upgrading when everything completely froze. I left it sit for an hour but it would not respond to anything. So I powered down the machine and it didn't have the necessary files to run Ubuntu. I went to the terminal and it told me to put in some command that I can not remember to 'rebuild' something. That takes me to now, when I turn on the laptop it comes up with a screen "GNU GRUB version 1.98+20100804-5ubuntu3.3" and has a bunch of options such as: 1. Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.35-32-generic 2. Ubuntu, with Linux 2.6.35-32-generic (recover mode) etc. (there are like 15 of these with different numbers after 2.6.35 and the word 'generic'. It doesn't seem to matter what I pick, it will go to the "Ubuntu" loading screen with the colored dots but then every time it will freeze and I have to reboot to the same thing. I can't seem to get a terminal prompt anywhere either. Any ideas? I can't think of what to do :(

  Read the article

• Unable to run 'sudo apt-get dist-upgrade' due to authentication issues

  - by TobyG

  I've just attempted to run sudo apt-get dist-upgrade on my Ubuntu box, but am getting the following error... WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! librdbmspp php5-ioncube-loader sw-libboost-date-time1.49.0 sw-libboost-system1.49.0 sw-libboost-filesystem1.49.0 sw-libboost-program-options1.49.0 sw-libboost-regex1.49.0 sw-libboost-serialization1.49.0 sw-libpoco I've tried running... $ sudo apt-key update $ sudo apt-get update ... as found in this question, but I'm still getting the error. Can anyone help, please? Update on 5th June Repos currently in /etc/apt/sources.list (links broken due to reputation being too low to include more than 2 links)… deb http: //gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted universe multiverse deb http: //gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted universe multiverse deb http: //gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted universe multiverse deb http: //archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise partner deb http: //security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted universe multiverse deb http: //autoinstall.plesk.com/ubuntu/PSA_11.5.30 precise all deb http: //autoinstall.plesk.com/debian/SITEBUILDER_11.5.10 all all deb http: //autoinstall.plesk.com/debian/BILLING_11.5.30 all all

  Read the article

• Launcher icons are invisible after upgrade from 11.10 to 12.04

  - by Clo Knibbe

  I am re-purposing an old laptop. I installed 11.10 on it and then immediately upgraded to 12.04. (I could not directly install 12.04 as my system does not support PAE.) When my system was (briefly) 11.10, the desktop appeared as expected. However, after the upgrade to 12.04, the icons in the launcher area are invisible. If I hover over the spot where the icon should be the little popup window showing the tool's name appears, and I can click to invoke the tool. I just cannot see the icons. ![invisible icons in launcher][1] The icons do appear as expected in other contexts, for example in the Home folder and in Dash Home. My theme is "Ambiance (default)" I do not have a ~/.icons folder. This is the top level contents of /usr/share/icons: default DMZ-Black DMZ-White gnome handhelds hicolor HighContrast HighContrastInverse Humanity Humanity-Dark locolor LoginIcons LowContrast redglass ubuntu-mono-dark ubuntu-mono-light unity-icon-theme whiteglass (Sorry for the poor formatting, can't get it to show in list.) I suspect that the launcher isn't looking for the icons in the right place, but I don't know how to confirm that, or how to correct. This is my first foray into Linux, although I used to use Unix a few decades ago. This doesn't look much like my old Sun workstation, though! Does anyone have any suggestions or insights for me? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Distribution upgrade freezes

  - by lugte098

  When upgrading from Ubuntu 10.04 to 10.10 the distribution upgrade program freezes after it notifies me of a change in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.mysqld and asks me to keep the old file or accept the new changes (I accepted them). The terminal says: Configuration file `/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld' ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation. ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version. What would you like to do about it ? Your options are: Y or I : install the package maintainer's version N or O : keep your currently-installed version D : show the differences between the versions Z : start a shell to examine the situation The default action is to keep your current version. *** usr.sbin.mysqld (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? y Installing new version of config file /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld ... The program hasn't done anything after this for about 2 hours now and I have no idea what I should do at this point. Can I quit the program and restart it? Or is there another action I should take? It did however change the '/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.mysqld' to the new version, but is still frozen...

  Read the article

• after upgrade from 10.04 to 12.04 cannot boot with linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae

  - by Ricardo

  After upgrade from 10.04 to 12.04, I cannot boot with linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae: process gets frozen in a xubuntu initialization screen (I had qimo installed). If I try the recovery mode (with the same Linux version), booting freezes after this message: Begin: Mounting root file system. If in grub menu I choose Previous Linux versions, I can boot using Linux 2.6.32-41-generic-pae. But once logged in, some things don't seem to work (apt-get update fails, update manager fails, HID menu does not provide suggestions...) (to be honest, I have no idea whether this is part of the bigger issue) Reading in Ask Ubuntu through apparently similar problems, I decided to follow some advices: got boot-repair and run it. The problem remains & I got this report. I also run as root in terminal $ sudo update-initramfs -u and this is what I got: update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-24-generic-pae cryptsetup: WARNING: failed to detect canonical device of /dev/sda1 cryptsetup: WARNING: could not determine root device from /etc/fstab /tmp/mkinitramfs_EIDlHy/scripts/classmate-bottom/45xconfig: 9: .: Can't open /scripts/casper-functions What else? My pc is Intel® Core™ i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz × 8, graphs is GeForce 8400 GS/PCIe/SSE2, memory is 7,8 GiB. I have two questions: Is this a bug in the newest kernel I should report? Is there anything I can do appart from a fresh install?

  Read the article

• Fuji camera "mounts" but folder not in Dolphin After Kubuntu 13.10 upgrade

  - by user207207

  Fuji camera mount reported in attached devices but not visible in Dolphin After Kubuntu 13.10 upgrade Have reinstalled the driver, and a few other suggestions, for other cameras mounts failing on previous Ubuntu upgrades. I have already spent a couple of hours trying to get my photo's off the camera, very annoying. Worked perfectly in 11.04, 11.10, 12.04, 12.10 and 13.04. dmesg | tail; lsusb; lsb_release -a [ 6181.858786] CPUM: APIC 03 at 00000000fee00000 (mapped at ffffc90009400000) - ver 0x80050010, lint0=0x10700 lint1=0x10400 pc=0x00400 thmr=0x10000 [17261.396236] CPUM: APIC 00 at 00000000fee00000 (mapped at ffffc90000c6a000) - ver 0x80050010, lint0=0x10700 lint1=0x00400 pc=0x00400 thmr=0x10000 [17261.396239] CPUM: APIC 03 at 00000000fee00000 (mapped at ffffc90000c72000) - ver 0x80050010, lint0=0x10700 lint1=0x10400 pc=0x00400 thmr=0x10000 [17261.396241] CPUM: APIC 02 at 00000000fee00000 (mapped at ffffc90000c70000) - ver 0x80050010, lint0=0x10700 lint1=0x10400 pc=0x00400 thmr=0x10000 [17261.396255] CPUM: APIC 01 at 00000000fee00000 (mapped at ffffc90000c6e000) - ver 0x80050010, lint0=0x10700 lint1=0x10400 pc=0x00400 thmr=0x10000 [32456.884907] usb 2-5: new high-speed USB device number 2 using ehci-pci [32457.654046] usb 2-5: New USB device found, idVendor=04cb, idProduct=01e8 [32457.654050] usb 2-5: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=2, SerialNumber=3 [32457.654052] usb 2-5: Product: Digital Camera [32457.654053] usb 2-5: SerialNumber: 4C3230302020091117CAA59WP18548 Bus 002 Device 002: ID 04cb:01e8 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 003: ID 2013:024f PCTV Systems nanoStick T2 290e Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:082d Logitech, Inc. HD Pro Webcam C920 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu vissibleDescription: Ubuntu 13.10 Release: 13.10 Codename: saucy sudo apt-get install gvfs-bin gvfs-mount gphoto2://[usb:002,002] Error mounting location: Error initializing camera: -108: No such file or directory ...... I have reported a bug in Dolphin, which has been transferred to Solid. Further information : I ran solid-hardware list details udi = '/org/kde/solid/udev/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:04.1/usb2/2-5' parent = '/org/kde/solid/udev' (string) vendor = '04cb' (string) product = 'Digital Camera' (string) description = 'Camera' (string) Block.major = 189 (0xbd) (int) Block.minor = 137 (0x89) (int) Block.device = '/dev/bus/usb/002/010' (string) Camera.supportedProtocols = {'ptp'} (string list) Camera.supportedDrivers = {'gphoto'} (string list) I still can't get my photo's off, I can see the folders using the Gimp menu. If anyone has got any ideas, I'm willing to try them.

  Read the article

• laptop will not boot after attempting upgrade to 13.10

  - by naerwenya

  I wanted to update my OS to the new 14.04 LTS. I was running 12.04 LTS before and followed the advice that upgrades should be done in steps. I first upgraded to 12.10, which seemed to work fine, and later to 13.10. This was all done through the Software Manager. After the last upgrade, I am no longer able to boot up my computer. The GNU GRUB menu opens up, but after selecting Ubuntu, it just stalls with a blank purple screen. If I select one of the other kernels, it also stalls after "Loading initial ramdisk...". I can't get into the Recovery Menu, either. I'm still rather new to Linux and may have possibly made the situation worse. Unfortunately, nothing has worked yet. I tried reinstalling from a flash drive and on my first attempt, the wizard recognised a previous installation. Unfortunately, the wizard also didn't like how my partitions were set up (I didn't change anything) and gave an error before closing. Unfortunately, I didn't write the error down, but it was about the boot partition. On the next attempt and ever since, the installation wizard has stated that "This computer currently has no detected operating systems." This is strange, because I could see the disk and even access my files when booting up from the USB. At this point, I decided to back up my important files using dropbox. Before losing all my files, I wanted to try the Boot-Repair tool, which also produced no results, and the files are no longer visible when booting from USB. The link to the Boot-Repair log is at http://paste.ubuntu.com/7457249/. If I then proceed through to the "Something else" installation option, I can see that the partitions still exist. This is what they look like: /dev/sda free space (size indicated 1MB) /dev/sda1 efi (33MB of 98 MB used) /dev/sda2 efi (352634MB of 746330MB used) /dev/sda3 swap (3725MB, none used) free space (0MB) Is there any way I might be able to get my computer to work and preserve my files as well?

  Read the article

• Can I upgrade the processor in my laptop (Satellite L455)?

  - by Alan Robinski

  I have a Toshiba Satellite L455-S5975 which is about three years old. The processor is currently an Intel Celeron 900. Does anyone know if it is possible to upgrade this to a newer one? I have heard the Core 2 Duo T6600 is a compatible replacement for my processor on other brands of computers, and I know the two have the same socket type (PGA478). I mostly need to know if this or any other newer processors are compatible with the Satellite's motherboard.

  Read the article

• How to obtain PowerTop data for each core in the CPU ?

  - by kashyapa

  PowerTop application provides C-state data and p-state data , but i'm not sure which CPUcore that data pertains to. And if I'd like to obtain PowerTop data fro each CPU core, how can I accoplish that ?

  Read the article

• Where is my CPU usage going?

  - by Josh

  My Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid virtual machine is saying it's at 100% CPU usage... but all I'm running is Thunderbird. According to top, CPU usage should be ~25.9%... How do I interpret this conflicting output from top? top - 13:55:26 up 3:35, 4 users, load average: 3.03, 2.59, 2.48 Tasks: 178 total, 1 running, 177 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 16.0%us, 79.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 1.3%hi, 3.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 509364k total, 479108k used, 30256k free, 3092k buffers Swap: 2096440k total, 58380k used, 2038060k free, 225116k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 7708 jnet 20 0 480m 109m 17m S 18.4 22.1 21:59.14 thunderbird-bin 4615 jnet 20 0 5488 1268 1040 S 2.3 0.2 5:00.03 nx-rootless-ses 7124 jnet 20 0 56688 27m 4812 S 2.0 5.5 6:35.09 nxagent 6724 nx 20 0 9628 1400 636 S 1.6 0.3 3:26.59 sshd 30106 root 20 0 2544 1236 908 R 0.7 0.2 0:00.33 top 19 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:22.45 ata/0 38 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:05.53 scsi_eh_1 345 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:04.72 kjournald 1719 root 20 0 3260 1192 944 S 0.3 0.2 0:17.36 vmware-guestd 1 root 20 0 2804 1356 940 S 0.0 0.3 0:01.99 init 2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 kthreadd 3 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0 4 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.15 ksoftirqd/0 5 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0 ... Specifically I'm referring to the fact that the CPU usage totals show 0% idle time: Cpu(s): 16.0%us, 79.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 0.0%wa, 1.3%hi, 3.0%si, 0.0%st Yet when adding up the percentages in the %CPU column I get 25.9%, not 100%!

  Read the article

• Ubuntu on VPS becomes unresponsive: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s

  - by Bhante Nandiya

  We have a VPS running Ubuntu, on Xen. The problem is this, about once a day, for about 20-50 minutes, at a random time, the server becomes completely unresponsive to the outside world. After this period, it becomes responsive again, as if nothing had happened, it doesn't lose uptime, it doesn't restart. It just starts responding again as if it had been in suspended animation. These outages occur under conditions of non-exceptional memory and cpu, for example 70% mem, 5% cpu. I have stopped all non-essential services so the usage is very even. These outages don't particularly occur during times of increased memory/cpu (during daily tasks), they sometimes occur at times of very low cpu use (<2%), but in the past also occured during swapping. These blackouts have been occurring both under Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 14.04 LTS - no change at all (I upgraded Ubuntu specifically to see if it helped this problem). It is possible to log into our webhosts site, and use their administration console to see error messages from during this time. Presumably, these messages are from the Xen virtualization, the main message goes like this: BUG: soft lockp - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [ksoftireqd/0:3] (repeats many times) SysRq : Emergency Sync (Sometimes this is the only message in the console) Others seen previously under different load situations include: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [swapper/0:0] (repeated many times) or: INFO: rcu_sched detected stall on CPU 0 (t=15000 jiffies) (repeated many times with t getting bigger) From googling around I've tried various kernel parameters such as nohz=off and acpi=off to no avail. All tech support has said is that other Ubuntu installations are not suffering the same problem. Anyone got any ideas or experience with this problem?

  Read the article

• Apache using 100% CPU, once again

  - by CBenni

  Recently, apache2 started using 100% of CPU power: top gives me From other, similar threads, I took the tip to use mod_status. Aside from HUGE amounts of NULL requests, it gives: CPU Usage: u2.16 s1.32 cu0 cs0 - .0835% CPU load 1.2 requests/sec - 17.6 kB/second - 14.6 kB/request 8 requests currently being processed, 42 idle workers The access and error logs do not show anything surprising or intriguing at all. Note the .8% CPU usage. Another tip was to use strace: root@server:~# strace -p 1956 Process 1956 attached - interrupt to quit restart_syscall(<... resuming interrupted call ...> And remains like this for at least half an hour, without producing any additional output. Restarting apache fixed the problem for less than a second The server runs a few custom python scripts aswell as a django-powered website on apache2 (up-to-date), but even turning the scripts off (or not having them active in the first place) did not change anything. After I stopped apache and powered my server off, powered it on a few minutes afterwards and restarted all my services, the CPU usage remained low for several hours, just in order to pop up again randomly (?) The DigitalOcean CPU stats on my server are: You can see how the CPU usage was super high for almost half a day until I restarted the bot - just to remain stable for several hours and then pop up again. I am completely at a loss of words and don't know what I could do to find out what piece of my code is giving me these problems or if apache itself is the cause... Therefore I would greatly appreciate any hints to the questions: What else can I try to do? Which things might I not have checked? Is this definitely in my own code? How do you find what part of python code crashes an app via a infinite loop or similar?

  Read the article

• Upgrade from 10.04 to 10.10 on netbook: now or later?

  - by jbatista

  I began with installing 9.04 in a netbook (Asus EeePC 1000H), upgraded to 9.10 and have now Lucid Lynx 10.04 (LTS). Most things tested run pretty good, with the most notable exception being wireless network due to the hardware which I first tested after the last major upgrade and a few times before giving up (failed to maintain connection to WPA2 networks). Other nuisances are not as important (e.g. some hotkeys work, a couple of them don't), but given that most everything works I'm concerned with doing an upgrade to find most things have been broken and I have to go back and dig up on how to get it to work... Once in a while, I look up for some posts elsewhere to read up on problems and to find out if they're tame enough to justify an upgrade to 10.10. I'm not in a rush, but I'm not interested in being too left behind some time from now that an upgrade becomes too costly or downright impossible (many things formatted too differently). I'm not even sure if it's possible to "easily" upgrade from LTS to LTS release... Therefore I ask if it's (in principle) possible to skip releases and only do a major upgrade much later on. For example, is it possible (or advisable) to do an upgrade only when the next LTS comes out (a couple of years from now)? Or is it preferable not to skip releases at all?

  Read the article

• Why is the upgrade manager freezing when upgrading to 13.10

  - by Nil

  Earlier today I started to upgrade to 13.10 only to return much much later and notice that the update manager was still running. It seems to be frozen and I am reluctant to hit ctrl+C. I can't launch nautilus using the icon on the launcher. When I try to run it via the terminal, this is what happens: $ nautilus Could not register the application: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: No such interface `org.gtk.Actions' on object at path /org/gnome/Nautilus My printers aren't showing up when I attempt to print. I don't know whether these a symptoms of the same problem. Should I let the update manage continue to run, or should I shut it down? Here are the processes running if it is any help: $ ps aux USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND root 1 0.0 0.2 5920 4072 ? Ss Oct18 0:02 /sbin/init root 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [kthreadd] root 3 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:31 [ksoftirqd/0] root 5 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [kworker/0:0H] root 6 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [kworker/u:0] root 7 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [kworker/u:0H] root 8 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [migration/0] root 9 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [rcu_bh] root 10 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:54 [rcu_sched] root 11 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [watchdog/0] root 12 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [watchdog/1] root 13 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:43 [ksoftirqd/1] root 14 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [migration/1] root 16 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [kworker/1:0H] root 17 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [cpuset] root 18 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [khelper] root 19 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [kdevtmpfs] root 20 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [netns] root 21 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [bdi-default] root 22 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [kintegrityd] root 23 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [kblockd] root 24 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [ata_sff] root 25 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [khubd] root 26 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [md] root 27 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [devfreq_wq] root 29 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [khungtaskd] root 30 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:09 [kswapd0] root 31 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SN Oct18 0:00 [ksmd] root 32 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? SN Oct18 0:00 [khugepaged] root 33 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [fsnotify_mark] root 34 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [ecryptfs-kthre root 35 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [crypto] root 46 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [kthrotld] root 49 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [binder] root 69 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [deferwq] root 70 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [charger_manage root 166 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [scsi_eh_0] root 167 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [scsi_eh_1] root 188 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [scsi_eh_2] root 244 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [kworker/u:4] root 245 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [ttm_swap] root 260 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [scsi_eh_3] root 266 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [scsi_eh_4] root 267 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 1:08 [usb-storage] root 268 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [scsi_eh_5] root 269 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:06 [usb-storage] root 302 0.0 0.0 2904 504 ? S 14:11 0:00 upstart-udev-br root 305 0.0 0.0 12080 1632 ? Ss 14:11 0:00 /lib/systemd/sy root 329 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:24 [jbd2/sda2-8] root 330 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwri root 352 0.0 0.0 2944 4 ? S Oct18 0:00 /sbin/ureadahea root 440 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:05 [flush-8:0] root 734 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [cfg80211] root 761 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [kpsmoused] root 780 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [pccardd] root 784 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [kvm-irqfd-clea root 902 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [hd-audio0] syslog 916 0.0 0.0 31120 680 ? Sl Oct18 0:13 rsyslogd -c5 102 1010 0.0 0.1 4344 1988 ? Ss Oct18 0:04 dbus-daemon --s root 1061 0.0 0.0 4844 924 ? Ss Oct18 0:00 /usr/sbin/bluet root 1077 0.0 0.0 2268 388 ? Ss Oct18 0:00 /bin/sh /etc/in root 1079 0.0 0.0 4664 484 tty4 Ss+ Oct18 0:00 /sbin/getty -8 root 1087 0.0 0.0 4664 484 tty5 Ss+ Oct18 0:00 /sbin/getty -8 root 1089 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [krfcommd] root 1098 0.0 0.0 4664 484 tty2 Ss+ Oct18 0:00 /sbin/getty -8 root 1099 0.0 0.1 4408 2076 tty3 Ss Oct18 0:00 /bin/login -- root 1101 0.0 0.0 4664 484 tty6 Ss+ Oct18 0:00 /sbin/getty -8 root 1168 0.0 0.0 2780 524 ? Ss Oct18 0:00 cron daemon 1169 0.0 0.0 2636 212 ? Ss Oct18 0:00 atd root 1183 0.0 0.0 34872 1448 ? SLsl Oct18 0:00 lightdm root 1249 0.0 0.0 3536 468 ? S Oct18 0:00 /bin/bash /etc/ root 1254 4.2 2.2 125832 40040 tty7 Rsl+ Oct18 81:27 /usr/bin/X :0 - root 1261 0.0 0.0 2268 344 ? S Oct18 0:00 /bin/sh /etc/ac root 1265 0.0 0.1 42004 2836 ? Ssl Oct18 0:01 NetworkManager root 1272 0.0 0.0 2268 376 ? S Oct18 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sb root 1286 0.0 0.3 30616 5824 ? Sl Oct18 0:05 /usr/lib/policy root 1304 0.0 0.0 2268 372 ? D Oct18 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/li root 1360 0.0 0.0 5532 560 ? S Oct18 0:00 /sbin/dhclient nobody 1368 0.0 0.0 5476 784 ? S Oct18 0:00 /usr/sbin/dnsma root 1514 0.0 0.1 34036 1932 ? Sl Oct18 0:01 /usr/lib/accoun root 1530 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S Oct18 0:00 [kauditd] root 1536 0.0 0.1 30480 2260 ? Sl Oct18 0:01 /usr/sbin/conso root 1653 0.0 0.1 28908 2104 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/upower root 1698 0.0 0.0 17464 1388 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 lightdm --sessi rtkit 1750 0.0 0.0 21368 696 ? SNl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/rtkit/ 1000 1844 0.0 0.1 88116 2320 ? SLl Oct18 0:00 /usr/bin/gnome- 1000 1855 0.0 0.3 73076 5884 ? Ssl Oct18 0:00 gnome-session - 1000 1901 0.0 0.0 4128 24 ? Ss Oct18 0:00 /usr/bin/ssh-ag 1000 1904 0.0 0.0 3880 192 ? S Oct18 0:00 /usr/bin/dbus-l 1000 1905 0.0 0.1 5520 2500 ? Ss Oct18 0:23 //bin/dbus-daem 1000 1915 0.0 0.0 43348 1420 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/at-spi 1000 1919 0.0 0.0 3412 1252 ? S Oct18 0:01 /bin/dbus-daemo 1000 1922 0.0 0.0 17176 1624 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/at-spi 1000 1932 0.0 0.5 165916 9124 ? Sl Oct18 0:21 /usr/lib/gnome- 1000 1947 1.9 0.2 100716 4024 ? S<l Oct18 37:48 /usr/bin/pulsea 1000 1949 0.0 0.0 27568 1616 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/gvfs/g 1000 1953 0.0 0.0 42628 1184 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/gvfs// 1000 1962 0.0 0.0 14472 916 ? S Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/pulsea 1000 1964 0.0 0.1 9548 2480 ? S Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 1980 0.0 0.0 3764 364 ? S Oct18 0:43 syndaemon -i 1. 1000 1987 0.0 0.0 24476 1668 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/dconf/ 1000 1990 0.0 0.4 122968 8844 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/policy 1000 1991 0.0 0.2 80480 5392 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/gnome- 1000 1992 0.0 1.2 167532 22776 ? Sl Oct18 0:07 nautilus -n 1000 1998 0.0 0.4 181444 7744 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 nm-applet 1000 2002 0.0 0.1 38020 2892 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/gvfs/g root 2012 0.0 0.1 59908 2664 ? Sl Oct18 0:24 /usr/lib/udisks 1000 2024 0.0 0.0 26456 1540 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/gvfs/g 1000 2028 0.0 0.0 27684 1536 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/gvfs/g 1000 2036 0.0 0.0 38964 1452 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/gvfs/g root 2049 0.0 0.0 3328 588 ? Ss Oct18 0:00 /sbin/mount.ntf 1000 2053 0.0 0.0 36792 1284 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/gvfs/g 1000 2058 0.0 0.1 53664 2364 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/gvfs/g 1000 2069 0.0 0.4 82816 8112 ? Sl Oct18 0:07 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2084 0.0 0.1 17984 2048 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/gvfs/g 1000 2086 0.0 0.0 2268 392 ? Ss Oct18 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr 1000 2087 0.0 0.7 68100 12856 ? Sl Oct18 0:13 /usr/bin/gtk-wi 1000 2089 0.0 0.9 98508 17756 ? Sl Oct18 0:13 /usr/lib/unity/ 1000 2091 0.0 0.3 65380 6692 ? Sl Oct18 0:01 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2117 0.0 0.2 98024 3888 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2125 0.0 0.1 86644 3408 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/indica 1000 2126 0.0 0.3 84272 6664 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2127 0.0 0.1 94384 2752 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2128 0.0 0.1 83968 2828 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2129 0.0 0.2 150020 4684 ? Sl Oct18 0:01 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2130 0.0 0.2 86572 3884 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/indica 1000 2131 0.0 0.1 69352 2524 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2144 0.0 0.1 74192 3152 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/evolut 1000 2182 0.0 0.2 101120 4420 ? Sl Oct18 0:02 /usr/lib/gnome- 1000 2193 0.0 0.3 77752 6448 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 telepathy-indic 1000 2200 0.0 0.1 44032 2708 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/telepa 1000 2209 0.0 0.2 77664 3860 ? Sl Oct18 0:02 zeitgeist-datah 1000 2216 0.0 0.2 44464 4180 ? Sl Oct18 0:01 /usr/bin/zeitge root 2234 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [kworker/1:1H] 1000 2246 0.0 1.1 93428 21256 ? Sl Oct18 0:02 /usr/bin/python 1000 2284 0.0 0.6 110040 11656 ? Sl Oct18 0:14 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2289 0.0 0.2 85632 3728 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2296 0.0 0.1 77900 3388 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2298 0.0 0.6 120356 11992 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/bin/python 1000 2300 0.0 0.1 87560 2408 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2301 0.0 0.2 91764 4404 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2303 0.0 0.2 78224 4592 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2370 0.0 0.2 74976 4908 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2372 0.0 0.4 106760 8972 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/bin/python 1000 2394 0.0 0.1 95624 2736 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2433 0.0 0.1 46640 2124 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/i386-l 1000 2457 0.0 0.0 34496 1648 ? Sl Oct18 0:00 /usr/lib/libuni root 2513 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< Oct18 0:00 [kworker/0:1H] 1000 3361 0.0 0.0 2268 396 ? SN 07:54 0:20 /bin/sh -c /usr root 4919 1.8 2.1 201196 38760 ? SNl 13:29 11:25 /usr/bin/python root 4957 0.0 0.0 3880 400 ? SN 13:29 0:00 dbus-launch --a root 4958 0.0 0.0 3424 1196 ? SNs 13:29 0:05 //bin/dbus-daem root 5128 0.0 0.0 2268 416 ? SN 13:50 0:00 /bin/sh -c whil root 5141 0.0 0.0 2436 508 ? SN 13:50 0:00 gnome-pty-helpe root 5145 0.0 1.7 245280 30872 pts/1 SNs+ 13:50 0:05 /usr/bin/python root 5159 0.0 0.4 64200 7432 ? SNl 13:50 0:05 /usr/bin/gnome- root 5163 0.0 0.0 27440 1552 ? SNl 13:50 0:00 /usr/lib/gvfs/g root 5167 0.0 0.0 42628 1648 ? SNl 13:50 0:00 /usr/lib/gvfs// root 9236 0.0 0.1 19112 2680 ? Ss 14:33 0:00 /usr/sbin/winbi root 9243 0.0 0.0 19112 1448 ? S 14:33 0:00 /usr/sbin/winbi whoopsie 9409 0.0 0.2 53608 4264 ? Ssl 14:33 0:00 whoopsie root 20087 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 14:34 0:00 [xfsalloc] root 20088 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 14:34 0:00 [xfs_mru_cache] root 20089 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 14:34 0:00 [xfslogd] root 20092 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 14:34 0:00 [jfsIO] root 20093 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 14:34 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 20094 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 14:34 0:00 [jfsCommit] root 20095 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 14:34 0:00 [jfsSync] root 20845 0.0 0.3 7980 6048 pts/2 SNs+ 14:29 0:04 /usr/bin/dpkg - root 23330 0.0 0.0 2896 568 ? S 14:09 0:00 upstart-file-br root 23332 0.0 0.0 2884 572 ? S 14:09 0:00 upstart-socket- root 24577 0.2 0.0 0 0 ? S 23:09 0:04 [kworker/1:2] root 24656 0.1 0.0 0 0 ? S 23:10 0:02 [kworker/0:0] 1000 24758 2.8 4.7 243692 85516 ? Sl 23:11 0:50 compiz root 25774 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S< 14:39 0:00 [iprt] 1000 26128 5.5 10.3 641628 187420 ? Sl 23:27 0:46 /usr/lib/firefo root 26374 0.0 0.0 3964 720 ? Ss 14:39 0:02 /usr/sbin/irqba root 26534 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 23:34 0:00 [kworker/0:1] root 26564 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 23:35 0:00 [kworker/1:1] 1000 26664 0.0 0.1 6784 3068 tty3 S+ 23:36 0:00 -bash 1000 26936 15.2 1.3 67520 23672 ? Sl 23:39 0:21 gnome-system-mo root 26992 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 23:40 0:00 [kworker/1:0] root 27049 0.0 0.0 4248 288 ? SN 23:41 0:00 sleep 30 1000 27057 9.5 0.8 68624 16140 ? Rl 23:41 0:00 gnome-terminal 1000 27064 0.0 0.0 2440 704 ? S 23:41 0:00 gnome-pty-helpe 1000 27065 2.6 0.1 6344 2608 pts/3 Ss 23:41 0:00 bash 1000 27113 0.0 0.0 5240 1144 pts/3 R+ 23:41 0:00 ps aux root 28267 0.0 0.0 2216 632 ? Ss 14:39 0:00 acpid -c /etc/a root 28333 0.0 0.0 2272 552 pts/2 SN+ 14:39 0:00 /bin/sh /var/li root 29699 0.0 0.2 8384 4608 pts/2 SN+ 14:40 0:00 modprobe wl

  Read the article

• Windows 7 x64 "upgrade" repair fails

  - by Polynomial

  I've been running into issues with Windows Update, which I can't seem to fix. The hotfixes don't work, nor does the Windows update readyness tool, or the manual SP1 upgrade. I get various esoteric errors which nobody seems to have a fix for. Looks like some of the update cache is corrupt and digital signatures seem to be broken on some packages / Windows Update components. Long story short, I have discovered the only option is to do a repair operation on the OS, to repair everything. It's so corrupt that only a complete replacement will fix it. According to various sources (including MSKB) one can perform a repair by running an in-place upgrade. I've got the Windows 7 Ultimate retail disc, which I've inserted into my machine. I ran setup.exe and went through in the following order: Install now Go online to get latest updates (I've also tried not getting updates) Wait for updates to be downloaded Select Windows 7 Ultimate (x64 architecture) and click next Accept the T&Cs, click next Click Upgrade At this point it spends a minute on the "checking compatibility" screen, after which I get the following error: The following issues are preventing Windows from upgrading. Cancel the upgrade, complete each task, and then restart the upgrade to continue. You can’t upgrade 64-bit Windows to a 32-bit version of Windows. To upgrade, obtain a 64-bit version of the installation disc, or go online to see how to install Windows 7 and keep your files and settings. 32-bit Windows cannot be upgraded to a 64-bit version of Windows. To upgrade, obtain a 32-bit version of the Windows installation disc. It also mentions a warning about potential conflicts with a storage driver and VS2010, but that doesn't seem to be the blocking issue. My currently installed version of Windows is Ultimate 64-bit (absolutely sure of this) and the disc is definitely a x86 / x64 combined Ultimate retail disc. There seem to be a few people who have run into this (e.g. this question), but I've not seen any answers. I've checked the event viewer, but can't spot anything in there that's related. Any idea how I can get this working? P.S: Just to pre-empt the inevitable "are you suuuuuuuuuuuuure it's x64 Ultimate?" questions:

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >