Search Results

Search found 4581 results on 184 pages for 'django widgets'.

Page 11/184 | < Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >

• Django: testing get query

  - by Brant

  Okay, so I am sick of writing this... res = Something.objects.filter(asdf=something) if res: single = res[0] else: single = None if single: # do some stuff I would much rather be able to do something like this: single = Something.objects.filter(asdf=something) if single: #do some stuff I want to be able to grab a single object without testing the filtered results. In other words, when i know there is either going to be 1 or 0 matching entries, I would like to jump right to that entry, otherwise just get a 'None'. The DoesNotExist error that goes along with .get does not always work so well when trying to compress these queries into a single line. Is there any way to do what I have described?

  Read the article

• Django foreign key error

  - by Hulk

  In models the code is as, class header(models.Model): title = models.CharField(max_length = 255) created_by = models.CharField(max_length = 255) def __unicode__(self): return self.id() class criteria(models.Model): details = models.CharField(max_length = 255) headerid = models.ForeignKey(header) def __unicode__(self): return self.id() In views, p_l=header.objects.filter(id=rid) for rows in row_data: row_query =criteria(details=rows,headerid=p_l) row_query.save() In row_query =criteria(details=rows,headerid=p_l) there is an error saying 'long' object is not callable in models.py in __unicode__, What is wrong in the code Thanks..

  Read the article

• Accessing django choice field

  - by Hulk

  there is a module as header , from test.models import SEL_VALUES class rubrics_header(models.Model): sel_values = models.IntegerField(choices=SEL_VALUES) So when SEL_VALUES is imported from test.modules.What is the code that has to go in views to get the choices in sel_values . And the test.modules has the following, class SEL_VALUES: vaue = 0 value2 = 1 class Entries(forms.Form) : models.IntegerField(choices=SEL_VALUES) SEL_VALUES = ((ACCESS.value,'NAME'),(ACCESS.value2,'DESIGNATION'))

  Read the article

• django forms in diferent contexts

  - by z3a

  I'm in a middle of a problem, I have a url like /account/login that displays a login form. I need to include this form in another template that have a different url. I tried to use {%include%} but this don't work, the form is not shown. Any one have a clue about this??

  Read the article

• Django unable to update model

  - by user292652

  i have the following function to override the default save function in a model match def save(self, *args, **kwargs): if self.Match_Status == "F": Team.objects.filter(pk=self.Team_one.id).update(Played=F('Played')+1) Team.objects.filter(pk=self.Team_two.id).update(Played=F('Played')+1) if self.Winner !="": Team.objects.filter(pk=self.Winner.id).update(Win=F('Win')+1, Points=F('Points')+3) else: return if self.Match_Status == "D": Team.objects.filter(pk=self.Team_one.id).update(Played=F('Played')+1, Draw = F('Draw')+1, Points=F('Points')+1) Team.objects.filter(pk=self.Team_two.id).update(Played=F('Played')+1, Draw = F('Draw')+1, Points=F('Points')+1) super(Match, self).save(*args, **kwargs) I am able to save the match model just fine but Team model does not seem to be updating at all and no error is being thrown. am i missing some thing here ?

  Read the article

• django models objects filter

  - by ha22109

  Hello All, I have a model 'Test' ,in which i have 2 foreignkey models.py class Test(models.Model): id =models.Autofield(primary_key=True) name=models.ForeignKey(model2) login=models.ForeignKey(model1) status=models.CharField(max_length=200) class model1(models.Model): id=models.CharField(primary_key=True) . . is_active=models.IntergerField() class model2(model.Model): id=models.ForeignKey(model1) . . status=model.CharField(max_length=200) When i add object in model 'Test' , if i select certain login then only the objects related to that objects(model2) should be shown in field 'name'.How can i achieve this.THis will be runtime as if i change the login field value the objects in name should also change.

  Read the article

• Modify on-the-fly verbose_name in a model field on django admin

  - by PerroVerd

  Hi I have this sample model working with the admin class Author(models.Model): name = models.CharField(_('Text in here'), max_length=100) with verbose_name set as ugettext_lazy 'Text in here', but sometimes, depending on the site_id i want to present a diferent verbose name, so I modified the init in this way def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): super(Author, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) #some logic in here self._meta.get_field('name').verbose_name = _('Other text') It works, displaying the 'Other text' instead the 'Text in here'... except for the very first time the author/add view is used. ¿Is it the right way to do it? ¿How can i fix the first time problem? Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• How to display total record count against models in django admin

  - by Rog

  Is there a neat way to make the record/object count for a model appear on the main model list in the admin module? I have found techniques for showing counts of related objects within sets in the list_display page (and I can see the total in the pagination section at the bottom of the same), but haven't come across a neat way to show the record count at the model list level.

  Read the article

• Django: How to set default language in admin on login

  - by lazerscience

  I'm saving an user's default language in his user profile and on login I want to set the admin's default language to it. One possibility I was thinking of is using a middleware, but I think if I do it on process_request I will not see an user object there since this is processed AFTER the middleware, so I could only set it after the next request! Any solutions are highly appreciated!

  Read the article

• Django - Specifying default attr for Custom widget

  - by Pierre de LESPINAY

  I have created this widget class DateTimeWidget(forms.TextInput): attr = {'class': 'datetimepicker'} class Media: js = ('js/jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.js',) Then I use it on my form class SessionForm(forms.ModelForm): class Meta: model = Session def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): super(SessionForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) self.fields['start_time'].widget = DateTimeWidget() self.fields['end_time'].widget = DateTimeWidget() No css class is applied to my fields (I'm expecting datetimepicker applied to both start_time & end_time). I imagine I have put attr at a wrong location. Where am I supposed to specify it ?

  Read the article

• Django access data passed to form

  - by realshadow

  Hey, I have got a choiceField in my form, where I display filtered data. To filter the data I need two arguments. The first one is not a problem, because I can take it directly from an object, but the second one is dynamically generated. Here is some code: class GroupAdd(forms.Form): def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): self.pid = kwargs.pop('parent_id', None) super(GroupAdd, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) parent_id = forms.IntegerField(widget=forms.HiddenInput) choices = forms.ChoiceField( choices = [ [group.node_id, group.name] for group in Objtree.objects.filter( type_id = ObjtreeTypes.objects.values_list('type_id').filter(name = 'group'), parent_id = 50 ).distinct()] + [[0, 'Add a new one'] ], widget = forms.Select( attrs = { 'id': 'group_select' } ) ) I would like to change the parent_id that is passed into the Objtree.objects.filter. As you can see I tried in the init function, as well with kwargs['initial']['parent_id'] and then calling it with self, but that doesnt work, since its out of scope... it was pretty much my last effort. I need to acccess it either trough the initial parameter or directly trough parent_id field, since it already holds its value (passed trough initial). Any help is appreciated, as I am running out of ideas.

  Read the article

• Manually listing objects in Django (problem with field ordering)

  - by Chris

  I'm having some trouble figuring out the best/Djangoic way to do this. I'm creating something like an interactive textbook. It has modules, which are more or less like chapters. Each module page needs to list the topics in that module, grouped into sections. My question is how I can ensure that they list in the correct order in the template? Specifically: 1) How to ensure the sections appear in the correct order? 2) How to ensure the topics appear in the correct order in the section? I imagine I could add a field to each model purely for the sake of ordering, but the problem with that is that a topic might appear in different modules, and in whatever section they are in there they would again have to be ordered somehow. I would probably give up and do it all manually were it not for the fact that I need to have the Topic as object in the template (or view) so I can mark it up according to how the user has labeled it. So I suppose my question is really to do with whether I should create the contents pages manually, or whether there is a way of ordering the query results in a way I haven't thought of. Thanks for your help!

  Read the article

• Django email attachement filetype limit

  - by Harry

  I would like to limit the type of files of the email attachments sent by my contact form to Doc, Docx, PDF. How do I do this?

  Read the article

• Custom Sorting on Custom Field in Django

  - by RotaJota

  In my app, I have defined a custom field to represent a physical quantity using the quantities package. class AmountField(models.CharField): def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): ... def to_python(self, value): create_quantities_value(value) Essentially the way it works is it extends CharField to store the value as a string in the database "12 min" and represents it as a quantities object when using the field in a model array(12) * min Then in a model it is used as such: class MyModel(models.Model): group = models.CharField() amount = AmountField() class Meta: ordering = ['group', 'amount'] My issue is that these fields do not seem to sort by the quantity, but instead by the string. So if I have some objects that contain something like {"group":"A", "amount":"12 min"} {"group":"A", "amount":"20 min"} {"group":"A", "amount":"2 min"} {"group":"B", "amount":"20 min"} {"group":"B", "amount":"1 hr"} they end up sorted something like this: >>> MyModel.objects.all() [{A, 12 min}, {A, 2 min}, {A, 20 min}, {B, 1 hr}, {B, 20 min}] essentially alphabetical order. Can I give my custom AmountField a comparison function so that it will compare by the python value instead of the DB value?

  Read the article

• Django: customizing the message after a successful form save

  - by chiurox

  Hello, whenever I save a model in my Admin interface, it displays the usual "successfully saved message." However, I want to know if it's possible to customize this message because I have a situation where I want to warn the user about what he just saved and the implications of these actions. class PlanInlineFormset(forms.models.BaseInlineFormset): def clean(self): ### How can I detect the changes? ### (self.changed_data doesn't work because it's an inline) ### and display what he/she just changed at the top AFTER the successful save? class PlanInline(admin.TabularInline): model = Plan formset = PlanInlineFormset

  Read the article

• Django model manager didn't work with related object when I do aggregated query

  - by Satoru.Logic

  Hi, all. I'm having trouble doing an aggregation query on a many-to-many related field. Let's begin with my models: class SortedTagManager(models.Manager): use_for_related_fields = True def get_query_set(self): orig_query_set = super(SortedTagManager, self).get_query_set() # FIXME `used` is wrongly counted return orig_query_set.distinct().annotate( used=models.Count('users')).order_by('-used') class Tag(models.Model): content = models.CharField(max_length=32, unique=True) creator = models.ForeignKey(User, related_name='tags_i_created') users = models.ManyToManyField(User, through='TaggedNote', related_name='tags_i_used') objects_sorted_by_used = SortedTagManager() class TaggedNote(models.Model): """Association table of both (Tag , Note) and (Tag, User)""" note = models.ForeignKey(Note) # Note is what's tagged in my app tag = models.ForeignKey(Tag) tagged_by = models.ForeignKey(User) class Meta: unique_together = (('note', 'tag'),) However, the value of the aggregated field used is only correct when the model is queried directly: for t in Tag.objects.all(): print t.used # this works correctly for t in user.tags_i_used.all(): print t.used #prints n^2 when it should give n Would you please tell me what's wrong with it? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Django - markup parser in template or view?

  - by Amit Ron

  I am building a website where my pages are written in MediaWiki Markup, for which I have a working parser function in Python. Where exactly do I parse my markup: in the view's code, or in the template? My first guess would be something like: return render_to_response( 'blog/post.html', {'post': post, 'content': parseMyMarkup(post.content) }) Is this the usual convention, or should I do something different?

  Read the article

• Displaying the contents (rather than saving) of an uploaded file with Django

  - by Ron

  How can I have a form with a FileField, where the uploaded file will not be saved but instead its text contents will be extracted and displayed?

  Read the article

• Django many to many annotations and filters

  - by dl8

  So I have two models, Person and Film where they're in a many to many relationship. My goal is to grab a film, and output the persons that have also appeared in at least 10 films. For example I can get the count individually by: >>> Person.objects.get(short__istartswith = "Matt Damon").film_set.count() 71 However, if I try to filter all the actors of a particular film out: >>> Film.objects.get(name__istartswith="Saving Private Ryan").actors.all().annotate(film_count=Count('film')).filter(film_count__gte=10) [] it returns an empty set since if I manually look at everyone's film_count it's 1, even though an actor such as Matt Damon (as seen above) has been in 71 films in my db. As you can see with this query, the annotation doesn't work: >>> Film.objects.get(name__istartswith="Saving Private Ryan").actors.all().annotate(film_count=Count('film'))[0].film_count 1 >>> Film.objects.get(name__istartswith="Saving Private Ryan").actors.all().annotate(film_count=Count('film'))[0].film_set.count() 7 and I can't seem to figure out a way to filter it by the film_set.count()

  Read the article

• django admin app error (Model with property field): global name 'full_name' is not defined

  - by rxin

  This is my model: class Author(models.Model): first_name = models.CharField(max_length=200) last_name = models.CharField(max_length=200) middle_name = models.CharField(max_length=200, blank=True) def __unicode__(self): return full_name def _get_full_name(self): "Returns the person's full name." if self.middle_name == '': return "%s %s" % (self.first_name, self.last_name) else: return "%s %s %s" % (self.first_name, self.middle_name, self.last_name) full_name = property(_get_full_name) Everything is fine except when I go into admin interface, I see TemplateSyntaxError at /bibbase2/admin/bibbase2/author/ Caught an exception while rendering: global name 'full_name' is not defined It seems like the built-in admin app doesn't work with a property field. Is there something wrong with my code?

  Read the article

• django generic view update/create: update works but create raises IntegrityError

  - by smarber

  I'm using CreateView and UpdateView directely into urls.py of my application whose name is dydict. In the file forms.py I'm using ModelForm and I'm exluding a couple of fields from being shown, some of which sould be set when either creating or updating. So, as mentioned in the title, update part works but create part doesn't which is obvious because required fields that I have exluded are sent empty which is not allowed in my case. So the question here is, how should I do to fill exluded fields into the file forms.py so that I don't have to override CreateView? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Django templates tag error

  - by Hulk

  def _table_(request,id,has_permissions): dict = {} dict.update(get_newdata(request,rid)) return render_to_response('home/_display.html',context_instance=RequestContext(request,{'dict': dict, 'rid' : rid, 'has_permissions' : str(has_permissions)})) In templates the code is as, {% if has_permissions == "1" %} <input type="button" value="Edit" id="edit" onclick="javascript:edit('{{id}}')" style="display:inline;"/>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; {% endif %} There is a template error in has_permissions line. Can any 1 tell me what is wrong here. has_permissions has the value 1 or 0.

  Read the article

• Django admin.py missing field error

  - by user782400

  When I include 'caption', I get an error saying EntryAdmin.fieldsets[1][1]['fields']' refers to field 'caption' that is missing from the form In the admin.py; I have imported the classes from joe.models import Entry,Image Is that because my class from models.py is not getting imported properly ? Need help in resolving this issue. Thanks. models.py class Image(models.Model): image = models.ImageField(upload_to='joe') caption = models.CharField(max_length=200) imageSrc = models.URLField(max_length=200) user = models.CharField(max_length=20) class Entry(models.Model): image = models.ForeignKey(Image) mimeType = models.CharField(max_length=20) name = models.CharField(max_length=200) password = models.URLField(max_length=50) admin.py class EntryAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin): fieldsets = [ ('File info', {'fields': ['name','password']}), ('Upload image', {'fields': ['image','caption']})] list_display = ('name', 'mimeType', 'password') admin.site.register(Entry, EntryAdmin) admin.site.register(Image)

  Read the article

• querying for timestamp field in django

  - by Hulk

  In my views i have the date in the following format s_date=20090106 and e_date=20100106 The model is defined as class Activity(models.Model): timestamp = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True) how to query for the timestamp filed with the above info. Activity.objects.filter(timestamp>=s_date and timestamp<=e_date) Thanks.....

  Read the article

• Creating a QuerySet based on a ManyToManyField in Django

  - by River Tam

  So I've got two classes; Picture and Tag that are as follows: class Tag(models.Model): pics = models.ManyToManyField('Picture', blank=True) name = models.CharField(max_length=30) # stuff omitted class Picture(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=100) pub_date = models.DateTimeField('date published') tags = models.ManyToManyField('Tag', blank=True) content = models.ImageField(upload_to='instaton') #stuff omitted And what I'd like to do is get a queryset (for a ListView) given a tag name that contains the most recent X number of Pictures that are tagged as such. I've looked up very similar problems, but none of the responses make any sense to me at all. How would I go about creating this queryset?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >