Search Results

Search found 17808 results on 713 pages for 'installation package'.

Page 11/713 | < Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >

• How to remove a package from the list of packages to be installed in apt-get?

  - by George

  After I tried installing vim using apt-get install, apt-get keeps giving me a segmentation fault while trying to install vim-runtime. I'm pretty sure it's just with that one specific package, and whenever I try to do apt-get install to install any other package, vim-runtime is in the list of packages that will be installed, and it's always the first package that tries to install, so I can't install any other packages. How can I remove vim-runtime from the list of packages that will be installed? It always shows up even if it is not a dependency of a package I want to install. Note: This is on an Ubuntu rootfs running on ARM.

  Read the article

• How to find out the installation path to my browser?

  - by rumtscho

  I am installing a proprietary CAD application (MEDUSA4 personal) and the installer wants to know the path to my web browser (as a prerequisite for online help). I have the default firefox installation and chromium, but I don't know the installation path for any of them, and couldn't find them among the usual suspects (/usr/bin, /usr/lib). It would be nice if you could tell me the path to one of them, and even nicer if you can tell me how to find out the installation path to any package managed by apt.

  Read the article

• How to determine the size of a package in terminal prior to downloading?

  - by user14590

  When using apt-get install <package_name>, and there are dependencies that need to be downloaded, the terminal outputs names of additional packages and total size, and asks for confirmation before downloading. But, when dependencies are satisfied and nothing but the named package needs to be downloaded there is no size output and no confirmation. When using Synaptic, I can see the total size that new packages that will use after installation but no way to see the size that needs to be downloaded, except to go from package to package and use properties to see the compressed size. I would like to know if there is a way to see the size of a package(s) in terminal and Synaptic prior to downloading and installing it/them?

  Read the article

• What do you expect from a package manager for Emacs

  - by tarsius

  Although several hundred Emacs Lisp libraries exist GNU Emacs does not have an (internal) package manager. I guess that most users would agree that it is currently rather inconvenient to find, install and especially keep up-to-date Emacs Lisp libraries. These pages make life a bit easier Emacs Lisp List - Problem: I see dead people (links). Emacswiki - Problem: May contain traces of nuts (malicious code). These are some package managers XEmacs package manager package.el - ELPA pases install.el install-elisp.el plugin.el use-package.el jem-pkg.el epkg/elm - the one I am working. And this are some packages that provide functionality that might be useful in a package manager ell.el - Browse the Emacs Lisp List genauto.el - helps generate autoloads for your elisp packages date-calc.el - date calculation and parsing routines strptime.el - partial implementation of POSIX date and time parsing wikirel.el - Visit relevant pages on the Emacs Wiki loadhist.el, lib-requires.el, elisp-depend.el - Commands to list Emacs Lisp library dependencies. project-root.el - Define a project root and take actions based upon it So I would like to know from you what you consider important/unimportant/supplementary... in a package manager for Emacs. Some ideas Many packages (incorporate the Emacs Lisp List and other lists of libraries). Only packages that have been tested. Support for more than one package archive (so people can choose between many/tested packages). Dependency calculated based on required features only. Dependencies take particular versions into account. Only use versions that have been released upstream. Use versions from version control systems if available. Packages are categorized. Packages can be uninstalled and updated not only installed. Support creating fork of upstream version of packages. Support publishing these forks. Support choosing a fork. After installation packages are activated. Generate autoloads. Integration with Emacswiki (see wikirel.el). Users can tag, comment ... packages and share that information. Only FSF-assigned/GPL/FOSS software or don't care about license. Package manager should be integrated in Emacs. Support contacting author. Lots of metadata. Suggest alternatives before installing a particular package. Some discussions about the subject at hand emacs-devel 20080801 comp.emacs 20021121 RationalElispPackaging I am hoping for these kinds of answers Pointers to more implementations, discussions etc. Lengthy descriptions of a set of features that make up your ideal package manager. Descriptions of one particular disired/undisired feature. This has the advantage that the regular voting mechanism allows us to see what features are most welcomed. Feel free to elaborate on my ideas from above. Surprise me.

  Read the article

• Using Pragma in Oracle Package Body

  - by asalamon74

  I'd like to create an Oracle Package and two functions in it: A public function ( function_public ) and a private one ( function_private ). The public function calls the private one. I'd like to add the same pragma to the functions: WNDS, WNPS. Without the pragma I can create a code like this: CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE PRAGMA_TEST AS FUNCTION function_public(x IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2; END PRAGMA_TEST; CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY PRAGMA_TEST AS FUNCTION function_private(y IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS BEGIN -- code END; FUNCTION function_public(x IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS BEGIN -- code -- here is a call for function_private -- code END; END PRAGMA_TEST; If I'd like to add WNDS, WNPS pragma to function_public I should also add the same pragma to function_private because function_public calls function_private. It seems to me pragma can be used only in the package declaration, and not in package body, so I have to declare function_private in the package as well: CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE PRAGMA_TEST AS FUNCTION function_private(y IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2; PRAGMA RESTRICT_REFERENCES( function_private, WNDS, WNPS); FUNCTION function_public(x IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2; PRAGMA RESTRICT_REFERENCES( function_public, WNDS, WNPS); END PRAGMA_TEST; CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY PRAGMA_TEST AS FUNCTION function_private(y IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS BEGIN -- code END; FUNCTION function_public(x IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS BEGIN -- code -- here is a call for function_private -- code END; END PRAGMA_TEST; This solution makes my function_private public as well. Is there a solution to add pragma to a function which can be found only in the package body?

  Read the article

• CentOS 6 LEMP update - dependency error issue

  - by Latheesan Kanes

  I have setup a LEMP server following the guide Install Nginx/PHP-FPM on Fedora 20/19, CentOS/RHEL 6.5/5.10. It's been a while since I did the setup, so I wanted to grab the latest updates from REMI repository. I ran the following command: yum --enablerepo=remi,remi-php55 update I now get these dependency related errors: # yum --enablerepo=remi update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.nl.leaseweb.net * epel: mirror.1000mbps.com * extras: mirror.nl.leaseweb.net * remi: remi.schlundtech.de * updates: centos.mirror1.spango.com Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package chkconfig.x86_64 0:1.3.49.3-2.el6 will be updated ---> Package chkconfig.x86_64 0:1.3.49.3-2.el6_4.1 will be an update ---> Package glibc.x86_64 0:2.12-1.107.el6_4.4 will be updated ---> Package glibc.x86_64 0:2.12-1.107.el6_4.5 will be an update ---> Package glibc-common.x86_64 0:2.12-1.107.el6_4.4 will be updated ---> Package glibc-common.x86_64 0:2.12-1.107.el6_4.5 will be an update ---> Package gnupg2.x86_64 0:2.0.14-4.el6 will be updated ---> Package gnupg2.x86_64 0:2.0.14-6.el6_4 will be an update ---> Package iputils.x86_64 0:20071127-17.el6_4 will be updated ---> Package iputils.x86_64 0:20071127-17.el6_4.2 will be an update ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-358.23.2.el6 will be installed ---> Package kernel-firmware.noarch 0:2.6.32-358.18.1.el6 will be updated ---> Package kernel-firmware.noarch 0:2.6.32-358.23.2.el6 will be an update ---> Package libgcrypt.x86_64 0:1.4.5-9.el6_2.2 will be updated ---> Package libgcrypt.x86_64 0:1.4.5-11.el6_4 will be an update ---> Package mysql-libs.x86_64 0:5.1.69-1.el6_4 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit) for package: 2:postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16)(64bit) for package: 2:postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64 ---> Package mysql-libs.x86_64 0:5.5.34-1.el6.remi will be an update ---> Package nginx.x86_64 0:1.4.2-1.el6.ngx will be updated ---> Package nginx.x86_64 0:1.4.3-1.el6.ngx will be an update ---> Package php-pear.noarch 1:1.9.4-20.el6.remi will be updated ---> Package php-pear.noarch 1:1.9.4-23.el6.remi will be an update ---> Package php-pecl-jsonc.x86_64 0:1.3.2-1.el6.remi.1 will be updated ---> Package php-pecl-jsonc.x86_64 0:1.3.2-2.el6.remi will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 ---> Package php-pecl-mongo.x86_64 0:1.4.3-1.el6.remi.1 will be updated ---> Package php-pecl-mongo.x86_64 0:1.4.4-1.el6.remi will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 ---> Package php-pecl-sqlite.x86_64 0:2.0.0-0.3.svn313074.el6.remi.5 will be updated ---> Package php-pecl-sqlite.x86_64 0:2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 ---> Package postgresql-libs.x86_64 0:8.4.13-1.el6_3 will be updated ---> Package postgresql-libs.x86_64 0:8.4.18-1.el6_4 will be an update ---> Package remi-release.noarch 0:6-2.el6.remi will be updated ---> Package remi-release.noarch 0:6.4-1.el6.remi will be an update ---> Package rsync.x86_64 0:3.0.6-9.el6 will be updated ---> Package rsync.x86_64 0:3.0.6-9.el6_4.1 will be an update ---> Package selinux-policy.noarch 0:3.7.19-195.el6_4.12 will be updated ---> Package selinux-policy.noarch 0:3.7.19-195.el6_4.18 will be an update ---> Package selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 0:3.7.19-195.el6_4.12 will be updated ---> Package selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 0:3.7.19-195.el6_4.18 will be an update ---> Package setup.noarch 0:2.8.14-20.el6 will be updated ---> Package setup.noarch 0:2.8.14-20.el6_4.1 will be an update ---> Package tzdata.noarch 0:2013c-2.el6 will be updated ---> Package tzdata.noarch 0:2013g-1.el6 will be an update ---> Package xinetd.x86_64 2:2.3.14-38.el6 will be updated ---> Package xinetd.x86_64 2:2.3.14-39.el6_4 will be an update --> Running transaction check ---> Package compat-mysql51.x86_64 0:5.1.54-1.el6.remi will be installed ---> Package php-pecl-jsonc.x86_64 0:1.3.2-2.el6.remi will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 ---> Package php-pecl-mongo.x86_64 0:1.4.4-1.el6.remi will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 ---> Package php-pecl-sqlite.x86_64 0:2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(zend-abi) = 20121212-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Error: Package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(zend-abi) = 20121212-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Error: Package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(api) = 20121113-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Error: Package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(zend-abi) = 20121212-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Error: Package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(api) = 20121113-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Error: Package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(api) = 20121113-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Any idea how to solve these errors? Am I missing a package? or is this a bug?

  Read the article

• Group policy software installation feature on server 2008

  - by Force Flow

  What is the proper procedure for distributing software updates using group policy's software installation feature? For example, if I want to install Java, and Java 1.7u6 is already added as a package, should I: A) Remove the Java 1.7u6 package (selecting the "allow users to continue to use" option), and add Java 1.7u7? B) Add Java 1.7u7 and specify that it is an update to the existing 1.7u6 package? (Will this install the oldest version first, then install each update one after the other, or will it just install the latest package?) Note that this question is geared toward the operation of the software installation feature of group policy, not specifically the behavior of the Java installers. This could easily apply to the installation of Adobe Flash, Adobe Reader, or any other common software applications with frequent updates.

  Read the article

• Install package from debian stable unavailable in testing/unstable repositories

  - by overprescribed

  I'm currently running Debian testing and would like to install a package only available in the stable repositories. (I'm surprised I haven't come across this issue before) I could download the .deb directly and use dpkg to manually install it, but installing packages from one release into another is usually frowned upon. What's the best course of action? EDIT: Zoredache is right, I didn't realize this package has been removed from future versions of Debian as it no longer has a maintainer. It is of course, also pointed out by Zoredache, important to find out why a particular package has been removed before attempting to install it. I've altered the title slightly to reflect the actual issue.

  Read the article

• eclipse 3.4 (ganymede) package collision with type

  - by Monis Iqbal

  We have a package that ends with exception e.g. package a.b.c.exception; Our code base had no issues up till eclipse 3.3, however when we shifted to eclipse 3.4, it started giving errors related to this package: "The package a.b.c.exception collides with a type" When I refactor the package name to a.b.c.exceptions, there are no issues. Is this due to a bug in eclipse 3.4 or is there some setting to rectify this behavior?

  Read the article

• Python: import the containing package

  - by guy

  In a module residing inside a package, i have the need to use a function defined within the __init__.py of that package. how can i import the package within the module that resides within the package, so i can use that function? Importing __init__ inside the module will not import the package, but instead a module named __init__, leading to two copies of things with different names... Is there a pythonic way to do this?

  Read the article

• Install i486 .package onto x64 CentOS

  - by medoix

  I am trying to install a ".package" file with Autopackage onto my x64 CentOS server and i receive the below statement. -sh-3.2$ bash armagetronad-dedicated-0.2.8.3.1.i486-generic-linux-gnu.package Sorry, Autopackage only supports x86 32-bit systems, or 64-bit systems with compatibility libraries installed. Please install the compatibility libraries and rerun install. However i cannot find any documentation on what 32-Bit libraries are required or even where to start... Any ideas or suggestions would be appreciated greatly.

  Read the article

• Building Debian package - pre-installation check

  - by debianuser

  I am building a custom Debian package and during the installation, I would like the package to check for available diskspace and only proceed if there is enough space. I would like this to happen during re-install as well. I tried adding bash code to do the check in preinst and prerm file(for re-installations) with exit 1 if the check fails, but the installer went ahead and copied files and I end up with a broke installation. What am I doing wrong?

  Read the article

• How to import a class from default package

  - by mykhaylo

  Hi, I am using Eclipse 3.5 and I have created a project with some package structure along with the default package. I have one class in default package - Calculations.java and I want to make the use of that class in any of the package (for instance in com.company.calc). When I try to make the use of the class which is default package, its giving me compile error. Its not able to recognise the class in default package. Where is a problem? Calculations.java - source code public class Calculations{ native public int Calculate(int contextId); native public double GetProgress(int contextId); static { System.loadLibrary("Calc"); } } I can put my class in any other package. This class has some native method which is implemented in Delphi . If I put that class in any of the folder,I will have to make the change that DLL which I want to avoid(really - I can not). Thats why I put my class in the default package.

  Read the article

• Java installation problem

  - by Zxy

  I cannot install java on my ubuntu 12.04: zero@ghostrider:~$ sudo apt-get purge openjdk* [sudo] password for zero: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Note, selecting 'openjdk-6-demo' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-7-jre-headless' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'uwsgi-plugin-jwsgi-openjdk-6' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-jre' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-7-source' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-6-dbg' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk7-jdk' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-6-doc' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-7-jre-zero' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-7-demo' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-6-jre-headless' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-6-jdk' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-6-jre' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-6-jre-lib' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-6-jre-zero' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-7-dbg' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-7-doc' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-7-jdk' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-7-jre' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-6-source' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'openjdk-7-jre-lib' for regex 'openjdk*' Note, selecting 'uwsgi-plugin-jvm-openjdk-6' for regex 'openjdk*' Package uwsgi-plugin-jvm-openjdk-6 is not installed, so not removed Package uwsgi-plugin-jwsgi-openjdk-6 is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-6-dbg is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-6-demo is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-6-doc is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-6-jdk is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-6-jre is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-6-jre-headless is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-6-jre-lib is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-6-source is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-6-jre-zero is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-7-dbg is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-7-demo is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-7-doc is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-7-jdk is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-7-jre is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-7-jre-headless is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-7-jre-lib is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-7-jre-zero is not installed, so not removed Package openjdk-7-source is not installed, so not removed 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up oracle-java7-installer (7u3-0~eugenesan~precise4) ... Downloading... --2012-06-11 23:56:42-- http://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/7u3-b04/jdk- 7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz Resolving download.oracle.com (download.oracle.com)... 64.209.77.18 Connecting to download.oracle.com (download.oracle.com)|64.209.77.18|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Moved Temporarily Location: https://edelivery.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/7u3-b04/jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz [following] --2012-06-11 23:56:42-- https://edelivery.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/7u3-b04/jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz Resolving edelivery.oracle.com (edelivery.oracle.com)... 95.101.122.174 Connecting to edelivery.oracle.com (edelivery.oracle.com)|95.101.122.174|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Moved Temporarily Location: http://download.oracle.com/errors/download-fail-1505220.html [following] --2012-06-11 23:56:44-- http://download.oracle.com/errors/download-fail-1505220.html Connecting to download.oracle.com (download.oracle.com)|64.209.77.18|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 5307 (5.2K) [text/html] Saving to: `./jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz' 0K ..... 100% 1007K=0.005s 2012-06-11 23:56:44 (1007 KB/s) - `./jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz' saved [5307/5307] Download done. sha256sum mismatch jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz Oracle JDK 7 is NOT installed. dpkg: error processing oracle-java7-installer (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Errors were encountered while processing: oracle-java7-installer E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) zero@ghostrider:~$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:eugenesan/java You are about to add the following PPA to your system: More info: https://launchpad.net/~eugenesan/+archive/java Press [ENTER] to continue or ctrl-c to cancel adding it Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret- keyring /tmp/tmp.uGcZHfsoNF --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com:80/ --recv 4346FBB158F4022C896164EEE61380B28313A596 gpg: requesting key 8313A596 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com gpg: key 8313A596: "Launchpad synergy+" not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1 zero@ghostrider:~$ sudo apt-get update Ign http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Ign http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates InRelease Ign http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports InRelease Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release.gpg Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports Release.gpg Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Ign http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security InRelease Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports Release Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe i386 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security Release.gpg Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main i386 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security Release Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe i386 Packages Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main i386 Packages Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe i386 Packages Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main TranslationIndex Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Sources Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main TranslationIndex Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Translation-en Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main TranslationIndex Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Sources Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Sources Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Sources Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main i386 Packages Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Translation-en Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Translation-en Hit http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe i386 Packages Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main TranslationIndex Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Reading package lists... Done zero@ghostrider:~$ sudo apt-get install oracle-java7-installer Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done oracle-java7-installer is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y Setting up oracle-java7-installer (7u3-0~eugenesan~precise4) ... Downloading... --2012-06-11 23:57:11-- http://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/7u3-b04/jdk- 7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz Resolving download.oracle.com (download.oracle.com)... 64.209.77.18 Connecting to download.oracle.com (download.oracle.com)|64.209.77.18|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Moved Temporarily Location: https://edelivery.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/7u3-b04/jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz [following] --2012-06-11 23:57:11-- https://edelivery.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/jdk/7u3-b04/jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz Resolving edelivery.oracle.com (edelivery.oracle.com)... 95.101.122.174 Connecting to edelivery.oracle.com (edelivery.oracle.com)|95.101.122.174|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 302 Moved Temporarily Location: http://download.oracle.com/errors/download-fail-1505220.html [following] --2012-06-11 23:57:12-- http://download.oracle.com/errors/download-fail-1505220.html Connecting to download.oracle.com (download.oracle.com)|64.209.77.18|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 5307 (5.2K) [text/html] Saving to: `./jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz' 0K ..... 100% 976K=0.005s 2012-06-11 23:57:12 (976 KB/s) - `./jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz' saved [5307/5307] Download done. sha256sum mismatch jdk-7u3-linux-i586.tar.gz Oracle JDK 7 is NOT installed. dpkg: error processing oracle-java7-installer (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Errors were encountered while processing: oracle-java7-installer E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) zero@ghostrider:~$

  Read the article

• overriding new ubuntu installation

  - by tkoomzaaskz

  I've got a ubuntu 11.10 which has lost its support in May 2013, now I'd like to reintall up to the most up-to-date LTS, which is 12.04. My question is regarding my current partitions and doing backups. Is there a safe way to backup my data on some local partitions instead of copying files into DVDs/external drives (this is very uncormortable in my situation). Following are system commands shoing my disk: $ lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO MOUNTPOINT sda 8:0 0 232,9G 0 +-sda1 8:1 0 48,8G 0 +-sda2 8:2 0 63G 0 +-sda3 8:3 0 1K 0 +-sda4 8:4 0 53,7G 0 / +-sda5 8:5 0 18,6G 0 +-sda6 8:6 0 25,5G 0 +-sda7 8:7 0 23,3G 0 [SWAP] sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 and $ sudo fdisk -l [sudo] password for xyz: Disk /dev/sda: 250.1 GB, 250059350016 bytes glowic: 255, sektorów/sciezke: 63, cylindrów: 30401, w sumie sektorów: 488397168 Jednostka = sektorów, czyli 1 * 512 = 512 bajtów Rozmiar sektora (logiczny/fizyczny) w bajtach: 512 / 512 Rozmiar we/wy (minimalny/optymalny) w bajtach: 512 / 512 Identyfikator dysku: 0xc3ffc3ff Device Boot Beginning End Blocks ID System /dev/sda1 * 2048 102402047 51200000 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT /dev/sda2 215044096 347080703 66018304 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT /dev/sda3 347082750 488392064 70654657+ 5 Extended /dev/sda4 102402048 215042047 56320000 83 Linux /dev/sda5 395905923 434975939 19535008+ 83 Linux /dev/sda6 434976003 488392064 26708031 83 Linux /dev/sda7 347082752 395905023 24411136 82 Linux swap / Solaris In the beginning I had Windows Vista pre-installed with the machine when it was bought (damn!) and I installed linux (the one I have now). The windows-program in master boot record has been overriden by grub and now I can boot with both Windows and Linux. This is list of mounted devices: $ mount /dev/sda4 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro,commit=0) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) fusectl on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw) none on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw) none on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw) udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,mode=0755) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620) tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,size=10%,mode=0755) none on /run/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=5242880) none on /run/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) binfmt_misc on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) gvfs-fuse-daemon on /home/tomasz/.gvfs type fuse.gvfs-fuse-daemon (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=tomasz) It's strange (I don't remember such thing) that my current linux uses only one partition (/dev/sda4). But, anyway, it seems like that. My final question is: am I able to use one of the existing linux partitions for a backup and install ubuntu 12.04 without removing neither windows nor ubuntu 11.04? I mean - will grub automatically accept both old windows vista and 2 linuxes (old 11.10 and "new" 12.04)? Is there any hidden operation done while installation that could harm my custom-backup-partition while installing? my fstab file: proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0 # / was on /dev/sda4 during installation UUID=d44e89f5-9da2-48eb-83b3-887652ec95d2 / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1 # swap was on /dev/sda7 during installation UUID=bbe50535-ba57-434a-9272-211d859f0e00 none swap sw 0 0 sda5 and sda6 are trash partitions created during unsuccessful linux installation (this was linux installation before my current installation), I didn't delete these partitions, but I have access to them (and I can use them as backup partitions). edit: second question is: why does lsblk show /dev/sda having 232,9G while fdisk shows that it has 250.1GB? Where does the difference come from?

  Read the article

• Package pinning in Debian lenny

  - by bronto

  I need your advice as I don't know if I hit a bug, or I am misunderstanding something. On a Debian Lenny, I am trying to prevent the installation of two particular packages, when they are requested as dependencies fromother packages. I am using the same syntax I successfully used in Squeeze, but with no success at all. On squeeze, the following works as expected: # cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/local-no-pike.pref Package: pike7.6-core Pin: version * Pin-Priority: -1000 If I try to install pike7.6, which depends on pike7.6-core, apt and aptitude refuse to do so. On Lenny, the only difference is that there is no support for "fragments" in /etc/apt/preferences.d, and all preferences must be in the /etc/apt/preferences file. But it's not working. E.g., if the file contains: Package: grub-common Pin: version * Pin-Priority: -1000 apt doesn't stop me from installing grub, which depends on grub-common. I used strace to see if the file is being read, and it is. I was suggested to use some Debug:: options, but they didn't help to pinpoint the problem either. I have google'd a lot with some combinations of "lenny" "prevent" "package" "installation" "pinning" and the like, but nothing nice came out. And of course I read man apt_preferences. What am I missing here?

  Read the article

• How do I install GRUB on a RAID system installation?

  - by root45

  I'm trying to setup and install Ubuntu on a RAID 1 setup. I have two disks, sdb and sdc. I've been following this guide https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SoftwareRAID which more or less works for getting everything set up and Ubuntu installed. The problem is at the end of the installation, it tries to install GRUB. By default it tries my "first disk", which gives a "fatal error". I've tried installing it on a specific partion, e.g. sdb1 as well as RAID devices, e.g. md0, md1, etc.. Nothing seems to work. Edit: The actual error is "Unable to install GRUB in /dev/sdb Executing 'grub-install '/dev/sdb' failed. This is a fatal error." Then I'm taken back to the main install menu. If I choose "Install the GRUB boot loader on a hard disk" option, I can pick the partition, but entering sdb2 or md1 gives the same error. So I went ahead an just didn't install GRUB, which means now I presumably have a working Ubuntu installation, but I can't boot it. I've tried booting from the LiveCD to install GRUB, but I can't chroot into my system because it doesn't seem to recognize that my disk is a Linux disk. There's an error about it being a RAID partition. So basically I would really like to know how you know to which device to install GRUB at installation, or at the very least, how to install it on to my system now. I suppose I should also mention that sda is a Windows 7 installation that I would like to keep around and be able to access at boot. Thanks for any help.

  Read the article

• What are the risks of installing a "bad quality" package?

  - by ændrük

  When I try to install sonic-visualiser_1.9cc-1_amd64.deb via the Software Center the following warning message is displayed: The package is of bad quality The installation of a package which violates the quality standards isn't allowed. This could cause serious problems on your computer. Please contact the person or organisation who provided this package file and include the details beneath. Lintian check results for /home/ak/Downloads/sonic-visualiser_1.9cc-1_amd64.deb: Use of uninitialized value $ENV{"HOME"} in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/lintian line 108. E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/bin/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/bin/sonic-visualiser 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/applications/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/applications/sonic-visualiser.desktop 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/doc/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/doc/sonic-visualiser/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/doc/sonic-visualiser/CHANGELOG 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/doc/sonic-visualiser/COPYING 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/doc/sonic-visualiser/README 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/mimelnk/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/mimelnk/application/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/mimelnk/application/x-sonicvisualiser-layer.desktop 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/mimelnk/application/x-sonicvisualiser.desktop 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/pixmaps/ 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/pixmaps/sv-icon-light.svg 1000/1000 E: sonic-visualiser: wrong-file-owner-uid-or-gid usr/share/pixmaps/sv-icon.svg 1000/1000 I understand that this means the package doesn't meet Debian policy and I know how to override the warning and install the package anyway. What are the risks of doing so?

  Read the article

• How do you upgrade/remove a side-by-side installation?

  - by d3vid

  I've hit some snags in the last two upgrades (which I've been able to resolve with time, patience and AskUbuntu :) so come 12.04 I'm considering a side-by-side installation. Perhaps even installing a pre-release before that (because virtual machine testing can't reveal hardware-related issues). So, let's say I installed a side-by-side version. As far as I can tell this splits my existing partition and installs a brand new Ubuntu on partition 2. If all goes well, there are no hardware issues, and my favorite apps seem to be working, how do I switch to a one-sided installation? If I can't, how do I do a side-by-side installation the next time? (And, am I crazy to consider using a pre-release version to do a side-by-side installation?)

  Read the article

• Windows Server 2008 R2 install reboots unexpectedly during "Completing installation" phase

  - by knda

  I am attempting to install Windows Server 2008 R2 onto a Cisco UCS C201 M2 rack mounted server but am having major difficulties and wondering if anyone has some insight or items they could recommend for me to look at to get this one resolved. Installation is being attempted via the Cisco remote console (using CIMC's Virtual dvd-rom).. following the first phase of Setup where the installation files are copied to the target hard drive, then a reboot occurs to load Setup from the HDD, mid-way in the "Completing Installation" phase the system then reboots unexpectedly. System configuration Cisco UCS C201 M2 (2RU rack mounted server) 16GB RAM, 2x 73GB 15K SAS, 4x 300GB 10k SAS Add-on cards - Intel quad-port GigE card (no fibre channel cards) Storage - LSI MegaRAID SAS 9261-8i. onboard SATA is disabled (no SATA drives connected) KVM - Belkin No physical DVD-ROM.. :( I have... Run memtest86+, no RAM faults Disabled/enabled SATA support (BIOS) Attempted install from USB DVD-ROM, no effect Attempted unattended install scripted via Cisco Configuration Manager DVD provided Removed Belkin KVM in case that was causing drama Discovered that the Cisco website is "awesome" for searching for PDFs/Drivers cough, reverted back to Google Downloaded latest LSI drivers from LSI's site and used during Server 2008 install checked Windows ISO against checksum's from MS site checked Windows ISO by using it for an install in a VM Running out of ways to troubleshoot this as I am not sure how to enable any sort of 'verbose' mode during the setup process. Next step I have planned is to remove the Intel NIC and try the installation again.. Edit: Problem was the "Cisco INTEL QUAD PT GBE" (1000/PT) .. will have to see if this card is faulty or if it's just drivers.. thanks for the help.

  Read the article

• Fedora Installation with software repository in DVD does not work

  - by Raks

  I bought a new assembled PC with processor as Core-i3(2120) and Intel H61 motherboard and was trying to install Fedora 16 from a DVD. This DVD contains all the packages so that installation does not require to download packages from internet. I have used this DVD to install Fedora 16 offline many a times though in machines with different hardware configuration. But in this new machine when the installation reaches the stage wherein it asks for Software repository selection I select CD/DVD but the system fails to read the media and throws up an error that it cannot detect the media. THe LED in the DVD writer also indicate that the DVD is not being read. Now there is neither a problem with the DVD or the DVD drive because the installation started from the DVD itself. So what could the problem be, anything in the BIOS that is causing the problem, Is there any way I could utilize the packages already existing in the CD so that I save downloading the packages from DVD

  Read the article

• Software for scanning installation process?

  - by no name

  I forgot what is the name of the very good software which make some kind of restore point (save registry, and program files folder, etc...) before installing any software. After you install some program (ie "Notepad++") you can easily see what registry data use new installed program, on what location are the file's is stored and many more. The reason that I'm asking for help is that I have to automate some installation of public software, so after installation I need to uninstall it, so i have to delete all junk files. The software is called something like install wizard, or wizard install I forgot. If you have any idea of other application that do same thing , or you know exactly name of that software, or you have some good idea how to solve easy solve many installation and uninstallation, please let me know. Os: win7/xp 64/32

  Read the article

• Can I use wildcards is puppet package ensure to cover multiple releaseversion

  - by Rob van den Eijnde

  Using puppet I want to update packages on my (CentOS 5 & 6 servers) in a controlled way. Therefore I don't want to use ensure=>latest but rather ensure=>3.0.1-1. Example: class puppet::installation inherits puppet { package { "puppet": ensure => "3.0.1-1", } } The update works alright but puppet agent keeps complaining that there is a difference: /Stage[main]/Puppet::Installation/Package[puppet]/ensure: current_value 3.0.1-1.el6, should be 3.0.1-1 (noop) I can solve this by changing the ensure rule to 3.0.1-1.el6 but than that won't work on CentOS 5. Is there a short/clean way to solve this or do I have to write to seperate, os-releaseversion dependant rules. I have been googling for a solution but didn't find anything pertaining to this particular question. Any suggestion or reference to a relevant example would be appreciated.

  Read the article

• CentOS 5.5 Package documentation

  - by fthinker

  Usually when I install a common package like PostgreSQL or MySQL or Python etc using Yum it installs the files held within those packages into locations specific to CentOS itself. It may also install scripts specific to CentOS only. These paths may not be the same as the defaults found within the source distributions found on the PostgreSQL, MySQL, Python etc project websites and the scripts are usually unique to CentOS. Recently when I installed PostgreSQL under Ubuntu I found some very nice distribution specific information about how the install was organized and how to use the package in a Ubuntu way. I found this information in /usr/share/doc/ Is there any such information included within CentOS?

  Read the article

• How to fix a dpkg broken by the Brother MFC-7340 deb driver

  - by Roman A. Taycher

  I'm getting an apt-get error that says E: The package brmfc7340lpr needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive for it. (the brmfc7340lpr is a printer driver) its a local deb file, doing an dpkg or apt-get purge doesn't work, neither does apt-get install -f How do I reinstall a package from a local deb file? P.S. box-name% sudo apt-get upgrade [sudo] password for username: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: The package brmfc7340lpr needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive for it. box-name% sudo apt-get purge brmfc7340lpr Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: The package brmfc7340lpr needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive for it. box-name% sudo dpkg --purge brmfc7340lpr dpkg: error processing brmfc7340lpr (--purge): Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting a removal. Errors were encountered while processing: brmfc7340lpr box-name% sudo dpkg --install brmfc7340lpr-2.0.2-1.i386.deb Selecting previously deselected package brmfc7340lpr. (Reading database ... 725204 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace brmfc7340lpr 2.0.2-1 (using .../brmfc7340lpr-2.0.2-1.i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement brmfc7340lpr ... start: Unknown job: lpd dpkg: warning: subprocess old post-removal script returned error exit status 1 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ... start: Unknown job: lpd dpkg: error processing brmfc7340lpr-2.0.2-1.i386.deb (--install): subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1 start: Unknown job: lpd dpkg: error while cleaning up: subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: brmfc7340lpr-2.0.2-1.i386.deb box-name% sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: The package brmfc7340lpr needs to be reinstalled, but I can't find an archive for it. box-name%

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >