Search Results

Search found 7240 results on 290 pages for 'natural join'.

Page 11/290 | < Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >

• Conditional Join In LINQ?

  - by Soo

  I am trying to write a query that grabs information from one database and joins it to information in a different database. TableA idA valueA idB TableB idB valueB The tricky part is that in TableA, idB isn't always defined, so when I do a normal join, I only get results where TableA has a idB value. What I want is to be able to grab all of the information from TableA even if it doesn't have a corresponding idB value.

  Read the article

• How can I join conditionally in LINQ queries?

  - by Steve Crane

  If I have two tables; Drivers keyed by DriverId and Trips with foreign keys DriverId and CoDriverId, and I want to find all trips where a driver was either the driver or co-driver I could code this in Transact-SQL as select d.DriverId, t.TripId from Trips t inner join Drivers d on t.DriverId = d.DriverId or t.CoDriverId = d.DriverId How could this be coded as a LINQ query?

  Read the article

• django join querysets from multiple tables

  - by dana

  if i have queries on multiple tables like: d = Relations.objects.filter(follow = request.user).filter(date_follow__lt = last_checked) r = Reply.objects.filter(reply_to = request.user).filter(date_reply__lt = last_checked) article = New.objects.filter(created_by = request.user) vote = Vote.objects.filter(voted = article).filter(date__lt = last_checked) and i want to display the results from all of them ordered by date (i mean not listing all the replies, then all the votes, etc ). Somehow, i want to 'join all these results', in a single queryset. Is there possible?

  Read the article

• Mysql Left join with condition on column

  - by skicster

  Hi, can you help me with sql query? I have this problem: I have two tables "Join" table: Reservation_has_meal +----------------+ | id_reservation | | id_meal | | pieces | +----------------+ and table with data: Meal +-------------+ | id_meal | | name | +-------------+ Sample data for Meal: 1 | carrot 2 | potatoe 3 | cucumber Reservation_has_meal 1 | 2 | 5230 1 | 3 | 1203 How can I get this result for reservation with id_reservation=1: id_meal | id_Reservation | name | pcs | -------------------------------------------- 1 | 1 | carrot | null| 2 | 1 | potatoe | 5230| 3 | 1 | cucumber | 1203| -------------------------------------------- And result for id_reservation = 2: id_meal | id_Reservation | name | pcs | -------------------------------------------- 1 | 2 | carrot | null| 2 | 2 | potatoe | null| 3 | 2 | cucumber | null| -------------------------------------------- Thanks for advice.

  Read the article

• SQL is this equivalent to a LEFT JoIn?

  - by Jim

  Is this equivalent to a LEFT JOIN? SELECT DISTINCT a.name, b.name FROM tableA a, (SELECT DISTINCT name FROM tableB) as b It seems as though there is no link between the two tables. Is there an easier / more efficient way to write this?

  Read the article

• mysql join table - selecting the newest row

  - by cmancre

  Hi, I have the following two MySQL tables TABLE NAMES NAME_ID NAME 1 name1 2 name2 3 name3 TABLE STATUS STATUS_ID NAME_ID TIMESTAMP 1 1 2010-12-20 12:00 2 2 2010-12-20 10:00 3 3 2010-12-20 10:30 4 3 2010-12-20 14:00 I would like to select all info from table NAMES and add most recent correspondent TIMESTAMP column from table STATUS RESULT NAME_ID NAME TIMESTAMP 1 name1 2010-12-20 12:00 2 name2 2010-12-20 10:00 3 name3 2010-12-20 14:00 Am stuck on this one. How do I left join only on the newer timestamp?

  Read the article

• MySQL 5 left join unknown column

  - by NP

  I had the below query working in mysql 4.1, but does not in 5.0: SELECT * FROM email e, event_email ee LEFT JOIN member m on m.email=e.email WHERE ee.email_id = e.email_id The error: 1054 (Unknown column 'e.email' in 'on clause')

  Read the article

• SQL Join only returning 1 row.

  - by kevin

  Not quite sure what I'm missing, but my SQL statement is only returning one row. SELECT tl.*, (tl.topic_total_rating/tl.topic_rates) as topic_rating, COUNT(pl.post_id) - 1 as reply_count, MIN(pl.post_time) AS topic_time, MAX(pl.post_time) AS topic_bump FROM topic_list tl JOIN post_list pl ON tl.topic_id=pl.post_parent WHERE tl.topic_board_link = %i AND topic_hidden != 1 ORDER BY %s I have two tables (post_list and topic_list), and post_list's post_parent links to a topic_list's topic_id. Instead of returning all the topics (where their board's topic_board_link is n), it only returns one topic.

  Read the article

• How can I disable 'natural breaks' in Workrave?

  - by Pixelastic

  I've just discovered Workrave, and was trying to use it along the Pomodoro technique (5mn break every 25mn). But the concept of 'natural breaks' of Workrave seems to interfere with what I'm trying to achieve. Workrave tries to guess that I'm doing a natural break if I stop using my mouse and keyboard for longer than 5s. It then stops the work timer, and start counting time as if I was doing my break. Here is a typical example : I've configured a 5mn rest break every 25mn. I start working. 10mn later, I receive a phone call, or start talking with a colleague, or any work-related action that do not need either keyboard nor mouse. Workrave then stops counting my time as work time, and starts its rest timer. If my phone call is shorter than 5mn, then Workrave will resume its timer where it stopped it. Meaning that my time on the phone is not counted as work time, and so my break time is pushed a few minutes later than it should be. Even worse, if my phone call is longer than 5mn, then Workrave count it as a complete rest break, and when I'll resume working, it will restart its timer completly. I'm looking for either a way to disable the natural breaks, or increase the 'inactivity time' from 5s to maybe ~1mn. Or maybe an other angle to look at the natural breaks that might work with the Pomodoro technique (forced 5mn breaks every 25mn). I'm using Ubuntu 11.10.

  Read the article

• Simple Self Join Query Bad Performance

  - by user1514042

  Could anyone advice on how do I improve the performance of the following query. Note, the problem seems to be caused by where clause. Data (table contains a huge set of rows - 500K+, the set of parameters it's called with assums the return of 2-5K records per query, which takes 8-10 minutes currently): USE [SomeDb] GO SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Data]( [x] [money] NOT NULL, [y] [money] NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT [PK_Data] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ( [x] ASC )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY] ) ON [PRIMARY] GO The Query select top 10000 s.x as sx, e.x as ex, s.y as sy, e.y as ey, e.y - s.y as y_delta, e.x - s.x as x_delta from Data s inner join Data e on e.x > s.x and e.x - s.x between xFrom and xTo --where e.y - s.y > @yDelta -- when uncommented causes a huge delay Update 1 - Execution Plan <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?> <ShowPlanXML xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" Version="1.2" Build="11.0.2100.60" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2004/07/showplan"> <BatchSequence> <Batch> <Statements> <StmtSimple StatementCompId="1" StatementEstRows="100" StatementId="1" StatementOptmLevel="FULL" StatementOptmEarlyAbortReason="GoodEnoughPlanFound" StatementSubTreeCost="0.0263655" StatementText="select top 100&#xD;&#xA;s.x as sx,&#xD;&#xA;e.x as ex,&#xD;&#xA;s.y as sy,&#xD;&#xA;e.y as ey,&#xD;&#xA;e.y - s.y as y_delta,&#xD;&#xA;e.x - s.x as x_delta&#xD;&#xA;from Data s &#xD;&#xA; inner join Data e&#xD;&#xA; on e.x &gt; s.x and e.x - s.x between 100 and 105&#xD;&#xA;where e.y - s.y &gt; 0.01&#xD;&#xA;" StatementType="SELECT" QueryHash="0xAAAC02AC2D78CB56" QueryPlanHash="0x747994153CB2D637" RetrievedFromCache="true"> <StatementSetOptions ANSI_NULLS="true" ANSI_PADDING="true" ANSI_WARNINGS="true" ARITHABORT="true" CONCAT_NULL_YIELDS_NULL="true" NUMERIC_ROUNDABORT="false" QUOTED_IDENTIFIER="true" /> <QueryPlan DegreeOfParallelism="0" NonParallelPlanReason="NoParallelPlansInDesktopOrExpressEdition" CachedPlanSize="24" CompileTime="13" CompileCPU="13" CompileMemory="424"> <MemoryGrantInfo SerialRequiredMemory="0" SerialDesiredMemory="0" /> <OptimizerHardwareDependentProperties EstimatedAvailableMemoryGrant="52199" EstimatedPagesCached="14561" EstimatedAvailableDegreeOfParallelism="4" /> <RelOp AvgRowSize="55" EstimateCPU="1E-05" EstimateIO="0" EstimateRebinds="0" EstimateRewinds="0" EstimatedExecutionMode="Row" EstimateRows="100" LogicalOp="Compute Scalar" NodeId="0" Parallel="false" PhysicalOp="Compute Scalar" EstimatedTotalSubtreeCost="0.0263655"> <OutputList> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="x" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="y" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="x" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="y" /> <ColumnReference Column="Expr1004" /> <ColumnReference Column="Expr1005" /> </OutputList> <ComputeScalar> <DefinedValues> <DefinedValue> <ColumnReference Column="Expr1004" /> <ScalarOperator ScalarString="[SomeDb].[dbo].[Data].[y] as [e].[y]-[SomeDb].[dbo].[Data].[y] as [s].[y]"> <Arithmetic Operation="SUB"> <ScalarOperator> <Identifier> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="y" /> </Identifier> </ScalarOperator> <ScalarOperator> <Identifier> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="y" /> </Identifier> </ScalarOperator> </Arithmetic> </ScalarOperator> </DefinedValue> <DefinedValue> <ColumnReference Column="Expr1005" /> <ScalarOperator ScalarString="[SomeDb].[dbo].[Data].[x] as [e].[x]-[SomeDb].[dbo].[Data].[x] as [s].[x]"> <Arithmetic Operation="SUB"> <ScalarOperator> <Identifier> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="x" /> </Identifier> </ScalarOperator> <ScalarOperator> <Identifier> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="x" /> </Identifier> </ScalarOperator> </Arithmetic> </ScalarOperator> </DefinedValue> </DefinedValues> <RelOp AvgRowSize="39" EstimateCPU="1E-05" EstimateIO="0" EstimateRebinds="0" EstimateRewinds="0" EstimatedExecutionMode="Row" EstimateRows="100" LogicalOp="Top" NodeId="1" Parallel="false" PhysicalOp="Top" EstimatedTotalSubtreeCost="0.0263555"> <OutputList> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="x" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="y" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="x" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="y" /> </OutputList> <RunTimeInformation> <RunTimeCountersPerThread Thread="0" ActualRows="100" ActualEndOfScans="1" ActualExecutions="1" /> </RunTimeInformation> <Top RowCount="false" IsPercent="false" WithTies="false"> <TopExpression> <ScalarOperator ScalarString="(100)"> <Const ConstValue="(100)" /> </ScalarOperator> </TopExpression> <RelOp AvgRowSize="39" EstimateCPU="151828" EstimateIO="0" EstimateRebinds="0" EstimateRewinds="0" EstimatedExecutionMode="Row" EstimateRows="100" LogicalOp="Inner Join" NodeId="2" Parallel="false" PhysicalOp="Nested Loops" EstimatedTotalSubtreeCost="0.0263455"> <OutputList> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="x" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="y" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="x" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="y" /> </OutputList> <RunTimeInformation> <RunTimeCountersPerThread Thread="0" ActualRows="100" ActualEndOfScans="0" ActualExecutions="1" /> </RunTimeInformation> <NestedLoops Optimized="false"> <OuterReferences> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="x" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="y" /> </OuterReferences> <RelOp AvgRowSize="23" EstimateCPU="1.80448" EstimateIO="3.76461" EstimateRebinds="0" EstimateRewinds="0" EstimatedExecutionMode="Row" EstimateRows="1" LogicalOp="Clustered Index Scan" NodeId="3" Parallel="false" PhysicalOp="Clustered Index Scan" EstimatedTotalSubtreeCost="0.0032831" TableCardinality="1640290"> <OutputList> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="x" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="y" /> </OutputList> <RunTimeInformation> <RunTimeCountersPerThread Thread="0" ActualRows="15225" ActualEndOfScans="0" ActualExecutions="1" /> </RunTimeInformation> <IndexScan Ordered="false" ForcedIndex="false" ForceScan="false" NoExpandHint="false"> <DefinedValues> <DefinedValue> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="x" /> </DefinedValue> <DefinedValue> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="y" /> </DefinedValue> </DefinedValues> <Object Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Index="[PK_Data]" Alias="[e]" IndexKind="Clustered" /> </IndexScan> </RelOp> <RelOp AvgRowSize="23" EstimateCPU="0.902317" EstimateIO="1.88387" EstimateRebinds="1" EstimateRewinds="0" EstimatedExecutionMode="Row" EstimateRows="100" LogicalOp="Clustered Index Seek" NodeId="4" Parallel="false" PhysicalOp="Clustered Index Seek" EstimatedTotalSubtreeCost="0.0263655" TableCardinality="1640290"> <OutputList> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="x" /> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="y" /> </OutputList> <RunTimeInformation> <RunTimeCountersPerThread Thread="0" ActualRows="100" ActualEndOfScans="15224" ActualExecutions="15225" /> </RunTimeInformation> <IndexScan Ordered="true" ScanDirection="FORWARD" ForcedIndex="false" ForceSeek="false" ForceScan="false" NoExpandHint="false" Storage="RowStore"> <DefinedValues> <DefinedValue> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="x" /> </DefinedValue> <DefinedValue> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="y" /> </DefinedValue> </DefinedValues> <Object Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Index="[PK_Data]" Alias="[s]" IndexKind="Clustered" /> <SeekPredicates> <SeekPredicateNew> <SeekKeys> <EndRange ScanType="LT"> <RangeColumns> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="x" /> </RangeColumns> <RangeExpressions> <ScalarOperator ScalarString="[SomeDb].[dbo].[Data].[x] as [e].[x]"> <Identifier> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="x" /> </Identifier> </ScalarOperator> </RangeExpressions> </EndRange> </SeekKeys> </SeekPredicateNew> </SeekPredicates> <Predicate> <ScalarOperator ScalarString="([SomeDb].[dbo].[Data].[x] as [e].[x]-[SomeDb].[dbo].[Data].[x] as [s].[x])&gt;=($100.0000) AND ([SomeDb].[dbo].[Data].[x] as [e].[x]-[SomeDb].[dbo].[Data].[x] as [s].[x])&lt;=($105.0000) AND ([SomeDb].[dbo].[Data].[y] as [e].[y]-[SomeDb].[dbo].[Data].[y] as [s].[y])&gt;(0.01)"> <Logical Operation="AND"> <ScalarOperator> <Compare CompareOp="GE"> <ScalarOperator> <Arithmetic Operation="SUB"> <ScalarOperator> <Identifier> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="x" /> </Identifier> </ScalarOperator> <ScalarOperator> <Identifier> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="x" /> </Identifier> </ScalarOperator> </Arithmetic> </ScalarOperator> <ScalarOperator> <Const ConstValue="($100.0000)" /> </ScalarOperator> </Compare> </ScalarOperator> <ScalarOperator> <Compare CompareOp="LE"> <ScalarOperator> <Arithmetic Operation="SUB"> <ScalarOperator> <Identifier> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="x" /> </Identifier> </ScalarOperator> <ScalarOperator> <Identifier> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="x" /> </Identifier> </ScalarOperator> </Arithmetic> </ScalarOperator> <ScalarOperator> <Const ConstValue="($105.0000)" /> </ScalarOperator> </Compare> </ScalarOperator> <ScalarOperator> <Compare CompareOp="GT"> <ScalarOperator> <Arithmetic Operation="SUB"> <ScalarOperator> <Identifier> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[e]" Column="y" /> </Identifier> </ScalarOperator> <ScalarOperator> <Identifier> <ColumnReference Database="[SomeDb]" Schema="[dbo]" Table="[Data]" Alias="[s]" Column="y" /> </Identifier> </ScalarOperator> </Arithmetic> </ScalarOperator> <ScalarOperator> <Const ConstValue="(0.01)" /> </ScalarOperator> </Compare> </ScalarOperator> </Logical> </ScalarOperator> </Predicate> </IndexScan> </RelOp> </NestedLoops> </RelOp> </Top> </RelOp> </ComputeScalar> </RelOp> </QueryPlan> </StmtSimple> </Statements> </Batch> </BatchSequence> </ShowPlanXML>

  Read the article

• Nhibernate Criteria Query with Join

  - by John Peters

  I am looking to do the following using an NHibernate Criteria Query I have "Product"s which has 0 to Many "Media"s A product can be associated with 1 to Many ProductCategories These use a table in the middled to create the join ProductCategories Id Title ProductsProductCategories ProductCategoryId ProductId Products Id Title ProductMedias ProductId MediaId Medias Id MediaType I need to implement a criteria query to return All Products in a ProductCategory and the top 1 associated Media or no media if none exists. So although for example a "T Shirt" may have 10 Medias associated, my result should be something similar to this Product.Id Product.Title MediaId 1 T Shirt 21 2 Shoes Null 3 Hat 43 I have tried the following solutions using JoinType.LeftOuterJoin 1) productCriteria.SetResultTransformer(Transformers.DistinctRootEntity); This hasnt worked as the transform is done code side and as I have .SetFirstResult() and .SetMaxResults() for paging purposes it wont work. 2) .SetProjection( Projections.Distinct( Projections.ProjectionList() .Add(Projections.Alias(Projections.Property("Id"), "Id")) ... .SetResultTransformer(Transformers.AliasToBean()); This hasn't worked as I cannot seem to populate a value for Medias.Id in the projections. (Similar to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1036116/nhibernate-criteria-api-projections) Any help would be greatly appreciated

  Read the article

• How do I join these queries?

  - by GregoryD

  query1: SELECT category.id, category.name, category.level, category.description, category.cat1, category.cat2, category.cat3, category.cat4, category.pri_color, category.sec_color, category.last_report AS report_id FROM category, reports_category_layout WHERE category.id = reports_category_layout.catID AND reports_category_layout.site_code = 'las' query2: SELECT DISTINCT category.id, COUNT(forum.id) AS posts, SUM(forum.view) AS views FROM category, forum WHERE category.id = forum.catID AND forum.approved = 'yes' AND forum.site_code = 'las' GROUP BY category.id query3: SELECT forum.catID, forum.title, forum.paragraph, forum.created, users.alias, forum.userID FROM forum, users, forum_cache WHERE forum.catID = forum_cache.catID AND forum.id = forum_cache.last_report AND users.id = forum.userID AND forum.approved = 'yes' Essentially, I am unsure about the syntax to join these properly. I have written a query that simply joins them, but in the case that the forum cache table contains an unapproved forum id, it will simply not return the entire row. what I really need is for query1 and query2 to be left joined on the category id, and for query 3 to be left outer joined on id = catID.

  Read the article

• CakePHP: 2-level JOIN with one Query

  - by Daniel Magliola

  I have the following models in CakePHP: A Deposit belongs to an Account An Account belongs to a Customer I want to have a list of Deposits, and I need to show the name of the customer (so I have to join through the Customer). I also need to paginate this list. If I set Deposit->recursive = 2, I can get the Customer, however, CakePHP runs one query joining Deposit and Account, and then runs one query per each Deposit, to get the Customer. How can I make it get both models with only one query? I tried this, but it didn't work: $this->paginate = array('joins' => array( array( 'table' => 'customers', 'alias' => 'AccountCustomer', 'type' => 'inner', 'foreignKey' => false, 'conditions' => array('Account.customer_id = AccountCustomer.id') ) )); Any ideas? Thanks! Daniel

  Read the article

• SQL Join to only the maximum row puzzle

  - by Billy ONeal

  Given the following example data: Users +--------------------------------------------------+ | ID | First Name | Last Name | Network Identifier | +--------------------------------------------------+ | 1 | Billy | O'Neal | bro4 | +----+------------+-----------+--------------------+ | 2 | John | Skeet | jsk1 | +----+------------+-----------+--------------------+ Hardware +----+-------------------+---------------+ | ID | Hardware Name | Serial Number | +----+-------------------+---------------+ | 1 | Latitude E6500 | 5555555 | +----+-------------------+---------------+ | 2 | Latitude E6200 | 2222222 | +----+-------------------+---------------+ HardwareAssignments +---------+-------------+-------------+ | User ID | Hardware ID | Assigned On | +---------+-------------+-------------+ | 1 | 1 | April 1 | +---------+-------------+-------------+ | 1 | 2 | April 10 | +---------+-------------+-------------+ | 2 | 2 | April 1 | +---------+-------------+-------------+ | 2 | 1 | April 11 | +---------+-------------+-------------+ I'd like to write a SQL query which would give the following result: +--------------------+------------+-----------+----------------+---------------+-------------+ | Network Identifier | First Name | Last Name | Hardware Name | Serial Number | Assigned On | +--------------------+------------+-----------+----------------+---------------+-------------+ | bro4 | Billy | O'Neal | Latitude E6200 | 2222222 | April 10 | +--------------------+------------+-----------+----------------+---------------+-------------+ | jsk1 | John | Skeet | Latitude E6500 | 5555555 | April 11 | +--------------------+------------+-----------+----------------+---------------+-------------+ My trouble is that the maximum "Assigned On" date for each user needs to be selected for each individual user and used for the actual join ... Is there a clever way accomplish this in SQL?

  Read the article

• Mysql : get data from 2 tables (need help)

  - by quangtruong1985

  Assume that I have 2 tables : members and orders (Mysql) Members : id | name 1 | Lee 2 | brad Orders : id | member_id | status (1: paid, 2: unpaid) | total 1 | 1 | 1 | 1000000 2 | 1 | 1 | 1500000 3 | 1 | 2 | 1300000 4 | 2 | 1 | 3000000 5 | 2 | 2 | 3500000 6 | 2 | 2 | 3300000 I have a sql query : SELECT m.name, COUNT(o.id) as number_of_order, SUM(o.total) as total2 FROM orders o LEFT JOIN members m ON o.member_id=m.id GROUP BY o.member_id which give me this: name | number_of_order | total2 Lee | 3 | 3800000 brad | 3 | 9800000 All that I want is something like this : name | number_of_order | total2 | Paid Unpaid | Paid Unpaid ------------------------------------------------ Lee | 3 | 3800000 | 2 1 | 2500000 1300000 ------------------------------------------------ brad | 3 | 9800000 | 1 2 | 3000000 6800000 ------------------------------------------------ How to make a query that can give me that result? Thanks for your time!

  Read the article

• Help with a Join in Rails 3

  - by Adam Albrecht

  I have the following models: class Event < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :action_items end class ActionItem < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :event belongs_to :action_item_type end class ActionItemType < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :action_items end And what I want to do is, for a given event, find all the action items that have an action item type with a name of "foo" (for example). So I think the SQL would go something like this: SELECT * FROM action_items a INNER JOIN action_item_types t ON a.action_item_type_id = t.id WHERE a.event_id = 1 AND t.name = "foo" Can anybody help me translate this into a nice active record query? (Rails 3 - Arel) Thanks!

  Read the article

• Linq to Entity Left Outer Join

  - by radman

  Hi All, I have an Entity model with Invoices, AffiliateCommissions and AffiliateCommissionPayments. Invoice to AffiliateCommission is a one to many, AffiliateCommission to AffiliateCommissionPayment is also a one to many I am trying to make a query that will return All Invoices that HAVE a commission but not necessarily have a related commissionPayment. I want to show the invoices with commissions whether they have a commission payment or not. Query looks something like: using (var context = new MyEntitities()) { var invoices = from i in context.Invoices from ac in i.AffiliateCommissions join acp in context.AffiliateCommissionPayments on ac.affiliateCommissionID equals acp.AffiliateCommission.affiliateCommissionID where ac.Affiliate.affiliateID == affiliateID select new { companyName = i.User.companyName, userName = i.User.fullName, email = i.User.emailAddress, invoiceEndDate = i.invoicedUntilDate, invoiceNumber = i.invoiceNumber, invoiceAmount = i.netAmount, commissionAmount = ac.amount, datePaid = acp.paymentDate, checkNumber = acp.checkNumber }; return invoices.ToList(); } This query above only returns items with an AffiliateCommissionPayment.

  Read the article

• Join Query Help

  - by John

  Hello, The query below works well. It pulls data from two MySQL tables, "submission" and "login." I would like to also pull data from a third table called "comment" in the same database. The table "comment" has the following fields: commentid, loginid, submissionid, comment, datecommented Two of the fields in the table "login" are called "loginid" and "username." In the query below, I would like to count all "commentid" in "comment" where "loginid" equals the "loginid" in "login" where "username" equals "$profile." How can I do this? Thanks in advance, John $sqlStr1 = "SELECT l.username, l.loginid, s.loginid, s.submissionid, s.title, s.url, s.datesubmitted, s.displayurl, l.created, count(s.submissionid) countSubmissions FROM submission AS s INNER JOIN login AS l ON s.loginid = l.loginid WHERE l.username = '$profile'";

  Read the article

• MySql left join on several regs

  - by egidiocs

  Hi there! I have this table1 idproduct(PK) | date_to_go 1 2010-01-18 2 2010-02-01 3 2010-02-21 4 2010-02-03 and this other table2 that controls date_to_go updates id | idproduct(FK) | prev_date_to_go | date_to_go | update_date 1 1 2010-01-01 2010-01-05 2009-12-01 2 1 2010-01-05 2010-01-10 2009-12-20 3 1 2010-01-10 2010-01-18 2009-12-20 4 3 2010-01-20 2010-02-03 2010-01-05 So, in this example, for table1.idproduct #1 2010-01-18 is the actual date_to_go and 2010-01-01 (table2.prev_date_to_go, first reg) is the original date_to_go . using this query select v.idproduct, v.date_to_go, p.prev_date_to_go original_date_to_go from table1 v left join produto_datas p on p.idproduto = v.idproduto group by (v.idproduto) order by v.idproduto can I assume that original_date_to_go will be the first related reg of table2? idproduct | date_to_go | original_date_to_go 1 2010-01-18 2010-01-01 2 2010-02-01 NULL 3 2010-02-21 2010-01-20 4 2010-02-03 NULL

  Read the article

• Customizing Hibernate Criteria - Adding conditions to a left join

  - by Douglas Ferguson

  I need to be able to do the following: Select * from Table1 left join Table2 on id1 = id2 AND i1 = ? Hibernate criteria doesn't allow be to specify the i1 = ? part. The existing code is using hibernate criteria and it would be a huge refactor to swap out for HQL Does anybody have any tips how I could implement this differently or any way to override the Hibernate Criteria? I'm not opposed to cracking open hibernate and modifying, but when I began to dig it, there seems to be layers upon layers of abstractions. I never found the the point where SQL is actually generated...

  Read the article

• Dealing w/ Sqlite Join results in a cursor

  - by Bill

  I have a one-many relationship in my local Sqlite db. Pretty basic stuff. When I do my left outer join I get back results that look like this: the resulting cursor has multiple rows that look like this: A1.id | A1.column1 | A1.column2 | B1.a_id_fk | B1.column1 | B1.column2 A1.id | A1.column1 | A1.column2 | B2.a_id_fk | B2.column1 | B2.column2 and so on... Is there a standard practice or method of dealing with results like this ? Clearly there is only A1, but it has many B-n relationships. I am coming close to using multiple queries instead of the "relational db way". Hopefully I am just not aware of the better way to do things. I intend to expose this query via a content provider and I would hate for all of the consumers to have to write the same aggregation logic.

  Read the article

• mySQL Left Join on multiple tables

  - by Jarrod

  Hi I'm really struggling with this query. I have 4 tables (http://oberto.co.nz/db-sql.png): Invoice_Payement, Invoice, Client and Calendar. I'm trying to create a report by summing up the 'paid_amount' col, in Invoice_Payment, by month/year. The query needs to include all months, even those with no data There query needs the condition (Invoice table): registered_id = [id] I have tried with the below query, which works, but falls short when 'paid_date' does not have any records for a month. The outcome is that month does not show in the results I added a Calendar table to resolved this but not sure how to left join to it. SELECT MONTHNAME(Invoice_Payments.date_paid) as month, SUM(Invoice_Payments.paid_amount) AS total FROM Invoice, Client, Invoice_Payments WHERE Client.registered_id = 1 AND Client.id = Invoice.client_id And Invoice.id = Invoice_Payments.invoice_id AND date_paid IS NOT NULL GROUP BY YEAR(Invoice_Payments.date_paid), MONTH(Invoice_Payments.date_paid) Please see the above link for a basic ERD diagram of my scenario. Thanks for reading. I've posted this Q before but I think I worded it badly.

  Read the article

• Doctrine Join DQL

  - by koko

  I's like to do a join between 2 tables on a specific ID. At the moment, I have this DQL: $q = Doctrine_Query::create() ->select('e.*, i.itemName, i.itemtypeId') ->from('Model_EventItem e') ->leftJoin('Model_Item i ON e.itemId = i.itemId') ->where('e.eventitemId = ?', $event->eventId) ->orderBy('i.itemName ASC'); The result is empty, although my eventId has a value ... Can you help me please? I there somewhere a tutorial on DQL-joins? I don't get it right with the help of the Doctrine documentation. Thanks! PS I have doctrine working in combination with Zend Framework.

  Read the article

• SQL query for getting count on same table using left outer join

  - by Sasi

  Hi all, I have a table from which i need to get the count grouped on two columns. the table has two columns one datetime column and another one is success value(-1,1,0) What i am looking for is something like this... count of success value for each month month----success-----count 11------- -1 ------- 50 11------- 1 --------- 50 11------- 0 ------- 50 12------- -1 ------- 50 12------- 1 ------- 50 12------- 0 ------- 50 if there is no success value for a month then the count should be null or zero. I have tried with left outer join as well but of no use it gives the count incorrectly. Thanks in advance Sasi

  Read the article

• mysql filtering result using left outer join

  - by user288178

  my query: SELECT content.*, activity_log.content_id FROM content LEFT JOIN activity_log ON content.id = activity_log.content_id AND sess_id = '$sess_id' WHERE activity_log.content_id IS NULL AND visibility = $visibility AND content.reported < ".REPORTED_LIMIT." AND content.file_ready = 1 LIMIT 1 The purpose of that query is to get 1 row from the content table that has not been viewed by the user (identified by session_id), but it still returns contents that have been viewed. What is wrong? ( I have checked the table making sure that the content_ids are there) Note: I think this is more efficient than using subqueries, thoughts?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >