Search Results

Search found 20409 results on 817 pages for 'url routing'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 11/817 | < Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >

  • weird routes automatically being added to windows routing table

    - by simon
    On our windows 2003 domain, with XP clients, we have started seeing routes appearing in the routing tables on both the servers and the clients. The route is a /32 for another computer on the domain. The route gets added when one windows computer connects to another computer and needs to authenticate. For example, if computer A with ip 10.0.1.5/24 browses the c: drive of computer B with ip 10.0.2.5/24, a static route will get added on computer B like so: dest netmask gateway interface 10.0.1.5 255.255.255.255 10.0.2.1 10.0.2.5 This also happens on windows authenticated SQL server connections. It does not happen when computers A and B are on the same subnet. None of the servers have RIP or any other routing protocols enabled, and there are no batch files etc setting routes automatically. There is another windows domain that we manage with a near identical configuration that is not exhibiting this behaviour. The only difference with this domain is that it is not up to date with its patches. Is this meant to be happening? Has anyone else seen this? Why is it needed when I have perfectly good default gateways set on all the computers on the domain?!

    Read the article

  • A star vs internet routing pathfinding

    - by alan2here
    In many respects pathfinding algorythms like A star for finding the shortest route though graphs are similar to the pathfinding on the internet when routing trafic. However the pathfinding routers perform seem to have remarkable properties. As I understand it: It's very perfromant. New nodes can be added at any time that use a free address from a finite (not tree like) address space. It's real routing, like A*, theres never any doubling back for example. IP addresses don't have to be geographicly nearby. The network reacts quickly to changes to the networks shape, for example if a line is down. Routers share information and it takes time for new IP's to be registered everywhere, but presumably every router dosn't have to store a list of all the addresses each of it's directions leads most directly to. I can't find this information elsewhere however I don't know where to look or what search tearms to use. I'm looking for a basic, general, high level description to the algorithms workings, from the point of view of an individual router.

    Read the article

  • Force Juniper-network client to use split routing

    - by craibuc
    I'm using the Juniper client for OSX ('Network Connect') to access a client's VPN. It appears that the client is configured to not use split-routing. The client's VPN host is not willing to enable split-routing. Is there a way for me to over-ride this configuration or do sometime on my workstation to get the non-client network traffic to by-pass the VPN? This wouldn't be a big deal, but none of my streaming radio stations (e.g. XM) work will connected to their VPN. Apologies for any inaccuracies in the terminology. ** edit ** The Juniper client changes my system's resolve.conf file from: nameserver 192.168.0.1 to: search XXX.com [redacted] nameserver 10.30.16.140 nameserver 10.30.8.140 I've attempted to restore my preferred DNS entry to the file $ sudo echo "nameserver 192.168.0.1" >> /etc/resolv.conf but this results in the following error: -bash: /etc/resolv.conf: Permission denied How does the super-user account not have access to this file? Is there a way to prevent the Juniper client from making changes to this file?

    Read the article

  • Linux port-based routing using iptables/ip route

    - by user42055
    I have the following setup: 192.168.0.4 192.168.0.6 192.168.0.1 +-----------+ +---------+ +----------+ |WORKSTATION|------| LINUX |------| GATEWAY | +-----------+ +---------+ +----------+ 192.168.150.10 | 192.168.150.9 +---------+ | VPN | +---------+ 192.168.150.1 WORKSTATION has a default route of 192.168.0.6 LINUX has a default route of 192.168.0.1 I am trying to use the gateway as the default route, but route port 80 traffic via the VPN. Based on what I read at http://www.linuxhorizon.ro/iproute2.html I have tried this: echo "1 VPN" >> /etc/iproute2/rt_tables sysctl net.ipv4.conf.eth0.rp_filter = 0 sysctl net.ipv4.conf.tun0.rp_filter = 0 sysctl net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter = 0 iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j MARK --set-mark 0x1 ip route add default via 192.168.150.9 dev tun0 table VPN ip rule add from all fwmark 0x1 table VPN When I run "tcpdump -i eth0 port 80" on LINUX, and open a webpage on WORKSTATION, I don't see the traffic go through LINUX at all. When I run a ping from WORKSTATION, I get this back from some packets: 92 bytes from 192.168.0.6: Redirect Host(New addr: 192.168.0.1) Vr HL TOS Len ID Flg off TTL Pro cks Src Dst 4 5 00 0054 de91 0 0000 3f 01 4ed3 192.168.0.4 139.134.2.18 Is this why my routing is not working ? Do I need to put GATEWAY and LINUX on different subnets to prevent WORKSTATION being redirected to GATEWAY ? Do I need to use NAT at all, or can I do this with routing alone (which is what I want) ?

    Read the article

  • Steps to deploy a custom routing protocol

    - by user134589
    I'm a Ph.D Student and I'm researching a Service Centric Networking architecture with resourceallocation on a large scale. What I'm looking to do is expand an existing routing protocol like OSPF with extra fields and some new message types that I need for communication between Nodes. I want to manipulate the cost of a network link and I want paths to be calculated like in OSPF V2/v3, but using the cost that my algorithms have calculated. What I have I have the source code of OSPF from Quagga. I am assuming I can edit this code how I want, including packet structures and creating new types. Yes, I am aware it won't be easy but this is a 6 years research project and I am eager to develop something new, to move forward. What I need I would like to know how I can deploy the edited OSPF source files I have (written in C) on any type of server. I have a large testbed environment available with hundreds of virtual nodes and pretty much any OS out there. So if I want to test my extended protocol, how do I make all the nodes in a network use this to communicate? I do not understand what parts of the kernel I need to edit here. I tried searching for days now and I am unable to find how to deploy a non-existing routing protocol, without the use of an application-level framework. If somebody could push me in the right direction that'd be awesome. note: I need this to be a routingprotocol and not an application, since I want this to work on op of the network layer for performance reasons. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • XP - ping changes routing table?

    - by Corelgott
    Hey Folks, I have got a real strange behaviour with one of my XP-Sp3 machines. Setup: A Server in the lan (192.168.5.0) proviedes access to all roadwarriors in 10.8.0.0 The DCHP has a static route for all clients pronouncing 192.168.5.235 as gateway for 10.8.0.0 All Clients can ping & access the vpn-machines; everything works like a charm But one Xp-Sp3 is not willing to connect to them. It gets all the same routes as any other sytem in the lan and I trippel-checked - there are no static routes on this machine When I ping any 10.8.0.0 device from this machine, the first two packaged work like a charm; but the next two (and any package after them) fail and get lost. When I look back into the routing table: There is a new route; a special one just for the device I pinged, which points to the right gateway - but which wasn't there earlier... As Long as this route exists the machine can't ping anything on 10.8.0.0. But if I remove the route by hand: The next to ping packages work fine... Has anybody got an idea about that? Anybody every seen such a behaviour? Any hint / help / tip is greatly appreachiated! thx in advance Corelgott Ps: I attach an image of the cmd to clarify things - its in german, but reading a routing table shouldn't be that hard...

    Read the article

  • Rewrite a dynamic URL to a new dynamic URL

    - by Jmino14
    I am new to the RewriteEngine and have not been able to find an answer to the following issue. I run an ecommerce site with an ever changing catalog of product skus. Our URLs are dynamic. The question is, what if I want to have a dynamic variable redirect to a different dynamic variable. For instance, I want: http://www.mydomain.com/product.jhtm?id=12345 to now go to: www.mydomain.com/product.jhtm?id=78910 How can I do this through the .htaccess? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • htaccess mask dynamic url with a static url

    - by Enkay
    I'm trying to do something with .htaccess that I'm not sure can be done. First thing I did is hide the .php extensions using the following code: RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}\.php -f RewriteRule ^(.*)$ $1.php Works great. Now what I'm trying to do and can't seem to figure out is the following: When a user types "mywebsite.com/products?id=12345" into the browser address bar, I want the server to serve the right product page according to the ID but display it in the address bar as "mywebsite.com/product" no matter what the product ID is. Is this possible to do? If yes how? Thanks

    Read the article

  • URLRewriter.net fails relative paths when using more than one substring in URL

    - by Andreas Strandfelt
    Hi. I have installed the URLRewriter on my server, and it works fine, but I have a rather big problem. Relative links in hyperlinks, CSS-links, images etc. doesn't work when I have URLs with more than one substring. E.g. (sorry, no http:// in front, as I do not have enough reputation): dkbyg.strandweb.dk/Leje-og-udlejning-arbejdskraft leads to the path dkbyg.strandweb.dk/Workers.aspx and works just fine. But dkbyg.strandweb.dk/Leje-og-udlejning-arbejdskraft/Midtjylland leads to dkbyg.strandweb.dk/Workers.aspx?Region=Midtjylland using this line in the Web.config: <rewrite url="~/Leje-og-udlejning-arbejdskraft/(.+)" to="~/Workers.aspx?Region=$1"/> It rewrites just fine, but my relative links doesn't work anymore. CSS, Images, links and so on thinks my root is now http://dkbyg.strandweb.dk/Leje-og-udlejning-arbejdskraft, which of course doesn't exist. Can't this be fixed? All my links are correctly set using the ~/, like this: <asp:HyperLink ID="HyperLink3" CssClass="black_text" NavigateUrl="~/Forgot-Password" runat="server">I have forgotten my password</asp:HyperLink>

    Read the article

  • PHP Form POST to external URL with Redirect to another URL

    - by Marlon
    So, what I am trying to accomplish is have a self-posting PHP form, POST to an external page (using CURL) which in turn redirects to another page. Currently, what is happening is that once I click "Submit" on the form (in contact.php) it will POST to itself (as it is a self-posting form). The script then prepares the POST using CURL and performs the post. The external page does its processing and then, the external page is supposed to redirect back to another page, in a referring domain. However, what happens instead, is that it seems like the contact.php page loads the HTML from the page the external page redirected to, and then, the contact.php's HTML loads after that, ON THE SAME PAGE. The effect, is what looks like two separate pages rendered as one page. Naturally, I just want to perform the POST and have the browser render the page it is supposed to redirect to as specified by the external page. Here is the code I have so far: <?php if(isset($_POST['submit'])) { doCURLPost(); } function doCURLPost() { $emailid = "2, 4"; $hotel = $_POST['hotel']; //you will need to setup an array of fields to post with //then create the post string $data = array ( "recipient" => $emailid, "subject" => "Hotel Contact Form", "redirect" => "http://www.localhost.com/thanx.htm", "Will be staying in hotel: " => $_POST['hotel'], "Name" => $_POST['Name'], "Phone" => $_POST['Phone'], "Comments" => $_POST['Comments']); $ch = curl_init(); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, "http://www.externallink.com/external.aspx"); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, 1); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION, true); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POST, true); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS, $data); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, array("Referer: http://www.localhost.com/contact.php")); $output = curl_exec($ch); $info = curl_getinfo($ch); curl_close($ch); } ?>

    Read the article

  • URL Routing with WebForms, what to do with additional querystrings like page number, filter, etc?

    - by Scott
    I am switching from Intelligencia's UrlRewriter to the new web forms routing in ASP.NET 4.0. I have it working great for basic pages, however, in my e-commerce site, when browsing category pages, I previously used querystrings that were built into my pager control to control paging. An old url (with UrlRewriting) would be: http://www.mysite.com/Category/Arts-and-Crafts_17 I have a MapPageRoute defined in global.asax as: routes.MapPageRoute("category-browse", "Category/{name}_{id}", ~/CategoryPage.aspx"); This works great. Now, somebody clicks to go to page 2. Previously I would have just tacked on ?page=2 as the querystring. Now, How do I handle this using web forms routing? I know I can do something like: http://www.mysite.com/Category/Arts-and-Crafts_17/page/2 But in addition to page, I can have filters, age ranges, gender, etc. Should I just keep defining routes that handle these variables, or should I continue using querystrings and can I define a route that allows me to use my querstrings like before?

    Read the article

  • jQuery / Loading content into div and changing url's (working but buggy)

    - by Bruno
    This is working, but I'm not being able to set an index.html file on my server root where i can specify the first page to go. It also get very buggy in some situations. Basically it's a common site (menu content) but the idea is to load the content without refreshing the page, defining the div to load the content, and make each page accessible by the url. One of the biggest problems here it's dealing with all url situations that may occur. The ideal would be to have a rel="divToLoadOn" and then pass it on my loadContent() function... so I would like or ideas/solutions for this please. Thanks in advance! //if page comes from URL if(window.location.hash != ''){ var url = window.location.hash; url = '..'+url.substr(1, url.length); loadContent(url); } //if page comes from an internal link $("a:not([target])").click(function(e){ e.preventDefault(); var url = $(this).attr("href"); if(url != '#'){ loadContent($(this).attr("href")); } }); //LOAD CONTENT function loadContent(url){ var contentContainer = $("#content"); //set load animation $(contentContainer).ajaxStart(function() { $(this).html('loading...'); }); $.ajax({ url: url, dataType: "html", success: function(data){ //store data globally so it can be used on complete window.data = data; }, complete: function(){ var content = $(data).find("#content").html(); var contentTitle = $(data).find("title").text(); //change url var parsedUrl = url.substr(2,url.length) window.location.hash = parsedUrl; //change title var titleRegex = /(.*)<\/title/.exec(data); contentTitle = titleRegex[1]; document.title = contentTitle; //renew content $(contentContainer).fadeOut(function(){ $(this).html(content).fadeIn(); }); }); }

    Read the article

  • sporadic routing to another website when opening a common url

    - by user226098
    I have a strange problem in our office: Sometimes when opening a url from one of our projects random url in any browser not the right website shows up but some other website. In most of the cases it redirects to google.com with some parameters like https://www.google.de/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=krOOU8_kGcSKswadyYDQBw&gws_rd=ssl or just the ugly google 404 page). But today it remains on the origial url but shows up the the content of http://debug.netdna-cdn.com/. This happens about 1 time a week and for no apparent reason. Even stranger it only occurs on a single pc in the network. It now happens on two different computers in the network. Both use windows 8. The problem cannot be fixed by clearing the browser cache but by rebooting the pc or using ipconfig /flushdns. So I think it has something to do with the dns cache of the machine. But I have no idea what the reason is for this and how i can figure out how to solve it. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How to suppress PHPSESSID in URL for Googlebot?

    - by Roque Santa Cruz
    I use cookie based sessions, and they work for normal interaction with our site. However, when Googlebot comes crawling out PHP framework, Yii, needs to append ?PHPSESSID to each URL, which doesn't look that good in SERP. Any ways to suppress this behavior? PS. I tried to utilize ini_set('session.use_only_cookies', '1');, but it does not work. PPS. To get an impression of the SERP, they look like this: http://www.google.com/search?q=site:wwwdup.uni-leipzig.de+inurl:jobportal

    Read the article

  • Asterix in URL?

    - by KajMagnus
    Are there any reasons I shouldn't use an asterix (*) in a URL? Background: With asterixes, I could provide these nice and user friendly (or what do you think??) URLs: example.com/some/folder/search-phrase* means search for pages with names starting with "search-phrase", located in /some/folder/. example.com/some/**/*search-phrase* means search for any page with "search-phrase" anywhere in its name. example.com/some/folder/* means list all pages in /some/folder/ (rather than showing the /some/folder/index page).

    Read the article

  • Are backlinks transitive when old URL is forwarded to new URL?

    - by JVerstry
    Say there are two companies operating in the same industry: www.companya.com and www.companyb.com. Company A has acquired some backlinks over time. Company B acquires company A and decides to only use its URL. It forwards properly all links from www.companya.com to www.companyb.com. Will company B benefit from the backlinks of www.companya.com through the redirection? Is it worth the effort from a backlink perspective only?

    Read the article

  • Using URL Rewrite with QDIG

    - by The Official Microsoft IIS Site
    One of the applications that I like to use on my websites it the Quick Digital Image Gallery (QDIG) , which is a simple PHP-based image gallery that has just enough features to be really useful without a lot of work on my part to get it working. (Simple is always better - ;-] .) Here's a screenshot of QDIG in action with some Bing photos: (Click to enlarge photo.) The trouble is, QDIG creates some really heinous query string lines; see the URL line in the following screenshot for an example:...(read more)

    Read the article

  • How do I enable multicast routing in Windows XP

    - by Simon Richter
    I have successfully set up a Windows XP machine as an IPv6 router using netsh, that is, it announces prefixes and forwards packets on two interfaces, as verified by pinging. Now I'd like to forward multicast frames between both subnets; hosts on both sides are properly sending out multicast listener reports, so all it would take would be for the router to process these and start forwarding datagrams. How can I enable IPv6 multicast routing between two interfaces?

    Read the article

  • Best SEO practices for mobile URLs: 301, rel=canonical, or something else?

    - by Chris
    I am developing a site with a mobile version and am trying to figure the appropriate way to manage the URLs for search engines. So far I've considered: Having a mobile site with rel="canonical" links to the regular site. Putting both the mobile site and full site on one URL, and doing user agent sniffing. Another opinion: Spencer: "If you have a mobile site at a separate location or URL, you should 301 redirect each and every mobile page to its corresponding page on your main website. Employ user agent detection so that the mobile optimized version is served up if someone's coming in from a hand-held. - http://developer.practicalecommerce.com/articles/1722-Mobile-site-Development-Best-Practices-for-SEO-Usability Both 2 and 3 make it hard for a user who wants to switch to the full site or mobile site manually, but I'm not sure 1 is the best alternative. What's the best way to write URLs for a mobile site?

    Read the article

  • Tuning Linux IP routing parameters -- secret_interval and tcp_mem

    - by Jeff Atwood
    We had a little failover problem with one of our HAProxy VMs today. When we dug into it, we found this: Jan 26 07:41:45 haproxy2 kernel: [226818.070059] __ratelimit: 10 callbacks suppressed Jan 26 07:41:45 haproxy2 kernel: [226818.070064] Out of socket memory Jan 26 07:41:47 haproxy2 kernel: [226819.560048] Out of socket memory Jan 26 07:41:49 haproxy2 kernel: [226822.030044] Out of socket memory Which, per this link, apparently has to do with low default settings for net.ipv4.tcp_mem. So we increased them by 4x from their defaults (this is Ubuntu Server, not sure if the Linux flavor matters): current values are: 45984 61312 91968 new values are: 183936 245248 367872 After that, we started seeing a bizarre error message: Jan 26 08:18:49 haproxy1 kernel: [ 2291.579726] Route hash chain too long! Jan 26 08:18:49 haproxy1 kernel: [ 2291.579732] Adjust your secret_interval! Shh.. it's a secret!! This apparently has to do with /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/secret_interval which defaults to 600 and controls periodic flushing of the route cache The secret_interval instructs the kernel how often to blow away ALL route hash entries regardless of how new/old they are. In our environment this is generally bad. The CPU will be busy rebuilding thousands of entries per second every time the cache is cleared. However we set this to run once a day to keep memory leaks at bay (though we've never had one). While we are happy to reduce this, it seems odd to recommend dropping the entire route cache at regular intervals, rather than simply pushing old values out of the route cache faster. After some investigation, we found /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_elasticity which seems to be a better option for keeping the route table size in check: gc_elasticity can best be described as the average bucket depth the kernel will accept before it starts expiring route hash entries. This will help maintain the upper limit of active routes. We adjusted elasticity from 8 to 4, in the hopes of the route cache pruning itself more aggressively. The secret_interval does not feel correct to us. But there are a bunch of settings and it's unclear which are really the right way to go here. /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_elasticity (8) /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_interval (60) /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval (0) /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_timeout (300) /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/secret_interval (600) /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_thresh (?) rhash_entries (kernel parameter, default unknown?) We don't want to make the Linux routing worse, so we're kind of afraid to mess with some of these settings. Can anyone advise which routing parameters are best to tune, for a high traffic HAProxy instance?

    Read the article

  • Best SEO practices for mobile URLs: 301, rel=canonical, or something else?

    - by Chris
    I am developing a site with a mobile version and am trying to figure the appropriate way to manage the URLs for search engines. So far I've considered: Having a separate mobile site (m.example.com) with rel="canonical" links to the regular site. Putting both the mobile site and full site on one URL (example.com), and doing user agent sniffing. Another opinion: Spencer: "If you have a mobile site at a separate location or URL, you should 301 redirect each and every mobile page to its corresponding page on your main website. Employ user agent detection so that the mobile optimized version is served up if someone's coming in from a hand-held. - http://developer.practicalecommerce.com/articles/1722-Mobile-site-Development-Best-Practices-for-SEO-Usability Both 2 and 3 make it hard for a user who wants to switch to the full site or mobile site manually, but I'm not sure 1 is the best alternative. What's the best way to write URLs for a mobile site?

    Read the article

  • Mac Server bizzare routing table

    - by The Unix Janitor
    My mac routing table usually is very simple. I know it's based on bsd , but what's it doing or trying to do. My routing table is usually very simple however, the second one, default was point to link5 ? Is this normal, or is this IPV6 craziness at work? Can somehelp me understand what OSX/BSD is doing? nternet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.1.254 UGSc 22 0 en1 127 127.0.0.1 UCS 0 0 lo0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 4 44102 lo0 169.254 link#5 UCS 0 0 en1 192.168.1 link#5 UCS 6 0 en1 192.168.1.1 0:18:39:6d:89:c5 UHLWIi 0 0 en1 739 192.168.1.189 50:ea:d6:86:26:91 UHLWIi 0 0 en1 798 192.168.1.194 127.0.0.1 UHS 0 0 lo0 192.168.1.203 5c:95:ae:dd:34:8d UHLWIi 0 0 en1 316 192.168.1.253 a:76:ff:b5:51:79 UHLWIi 0 0 en1 911 192.168.1.254 8:76:ff:b5:51:79 UHLWIi 32 204 en1 1117 192.168.1.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWbI 0 7 en1 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 link#1 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 UcI lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#1 UHLI lo0 fe80::%en1/64 link#5 UCI en1 fe80::21b:63ff:fec7:c486%en1 0:1b:63:c7:c4:86 UHLI lo0 fe80::223:12ff:fe01:d7fe%en1 0:23:12:1:d7:fe UHLWIi en1 ff01::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UmCI lo0 ff01::%en1/32 link#5 UmCI en1 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UmCI lo0 ff02::%en1/32 link#5 UmCI en1 ----------------------------------- Bizzare routing table here Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default link#5 UCS 113 0 en1 17.72.255.12 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 2 7 en1 1156 64.4.23.141 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 3 en1 1181 64.4.23.143 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1189 64.4.23.147 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 64.4.23.149 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 64.4.23.150 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 24 en1 1175 64.4.23.151 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 64.4.23.153 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 64.4.23.155 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 64.4.23.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 3 en1 1181 64.4.23.165 link#5 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 64.4.23.166 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 65.55.223.15 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 21 en1 1189 65.55.223.16 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 65.55.223.17 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1199 65.55.223.20 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 65.55.223.23 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1199 65.55.223.31 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 65.55.223.32 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 65.55.223.37 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 21 en1 1189 65.55.223.38 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 69.163.252.33 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 1 9 en1 1181 77.67.32.254 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1164 111.221.74.13 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 24 en1 1183 111.221.74.15 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 111.221.74.16 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 111.221.74.17 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 23 en1 1172 111.221.74.21 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 111.221.74.23 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1172 111.221.74.24 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1181 111.221.74.26 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1199 111.221.74.29 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1181 111.221.74.31 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 111.221.74.37 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1190 111.221.74.38 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1199 111.221.77.141 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 3 en1 1199 111.221.77.144 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 111.221.77.145 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1190 111.221.77.149 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 111.221.77.154 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 111.221.77.156 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1190 111.221.77.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 111.221.77.162 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 111.221.77.165 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 127 127.0.0.1 UCS 0 0 lo0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 4 40073 lo0 157.55.56.140 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1199 157.55.56.141 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 157.55.56.143 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.56.147 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 157.55.56.148 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 157.55.56.149 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1189 157.55.56.150 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.56.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1172 157.55.56.158 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1175 157.55.130.143 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.130.144 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.130.145 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 24 en1 1181 157.55.130.152 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1199 157.55.130.153 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1172 157.55.130.155 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1189 157.55.130.156 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1186 157.55.130.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1189 157.55.130.158 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 3 en1 1172 157.55.130.160 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1189 157.55.130.162 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 21 en1 1193 157.55.130.166 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.235.141 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1193 157.55.235.142 link#5 UHLWIi 1 1 en1 157.55.235.144 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1172 157.55.235.145 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1172 157.55.235.149 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 157.55.235.151 link#5 UHRLWIi 0 36 en1 157.55.235.152 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 21 en1 1189 157.55.235.153 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1178 157.55.235.156 link#5 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 157.55.235.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 157.55.235.158 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.55.235.159 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 157.55.235.162 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1183 157.55.235.166 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 25 en1 1181 157.56.52.14 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1181 157.56.52.15 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1183 157.56.52.16 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.17 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 14 en1 1199 157.56.52.19 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.20 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 3 17 en1 1199 157.56.52.22 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 24 en1 1181 157.56.52.25 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.28 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.29 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.31 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 157.56.52.33 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1189 169.254 link#5 UC 1 0 en1 169.254.174.250 127.0.0.1 UHS 1 0 lo0 169.254.255.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 0 2 en1 193.88.6.19 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 194.165.188.82 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1166 195.46.253.211 link#5 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 204.9.163.143 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1178 213.199.179.141 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1172 213.199.179.142 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1165 213.199.179.143 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1166 213.199.179.146 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1172 213.199.179.147 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1164 213.199.179.148 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1165 213.199.179.149 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1172 213.199.179.150 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1165 213.199.179.151 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1164 213.199.179.153 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1166 213.199.179.157 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1167 213.199.179.160 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1165 213.199.179.161 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1172 213.199.179.162 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 2 en1 1163 213.199.179.165 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 1 en1 1164 213.199.179.166 0:50:7f:5e:92:e2 UHLWIi 0 3 en1 1164 224.0.0.251 1:0:5e:0:0:fc UHmLWI 0 0 en1 255.255.255.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWbI 0 2 en1 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 link#1 UHL lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 UcI lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#1 UHLI lo0 fe80::%en1/64 link#5 UCI en1 fe80::21b:63ff:fec7:c486%en1 0:1b:63:c7:c4:87 UHLI lo0 fe80::223:12ff:fe01:d7fe%en1 0:23:12:1:d7:ff UHLWIi en1 ff01::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UmCI lo0 ff01::%en1/32 link#5 UmCI en1 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UmCI lo0 ff02::%en1/32 link#5 UmCI en1

    Read the article

  • WWW.yoursite.com or HTTP://yoursite.com which one is futureproof?

    - by Sam
    http://yoursite.com www.yoursite.com http://www.yoursite.com yoursite.com Which of these would you choose as your favourite to work with, if you were to make a site for 2011 and beyond, which domainname would you provide to clients, websites linking to you, your letterhead, contact cards. Why one OR other? Which to avoid? Thinking of the following aspects: validity, correctly loading URL audience, most geeks know http://, most seniors/clients don't easiest to remember / URL as a brand misspellings by user input (in mobile phone or desktop browser) browsers not understanding protocol-less links total length of chars for easy user input method of peferance by major search engines/social media sites consistency sothat links dont fragment but all point to the same

    Read the article

  • Routing domain over lan [closed]

    - by Buri
    I have server on my local network which is exposed to the internet. I have domain pointed on my IP and setup forwarding. The thing i would like to do is when i access example.com from lan to connection be routed directly on my server, not to the nearest DNS. Things I had in mind were to upgrade router with dd-wrt and setup routing rule, or to setup local DNS. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with neither of those systems.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >