Search Results

Search found 17808 results on 713 pages for 'installation package'.

Page 110/713 | < Previous Page | 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117  | Next Page >

• apt-get install was interrupted

  - by user3475299

  I am new to Ubuntu. I got the following lines after an interrupted apt-get install. Running depmod. update-initramfs: deferring update (hook will be called later) Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d. run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal 3.13.0-29-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-29-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 3.13.0-29-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-29-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-29-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/pm-utils 3.13.0-29-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-29-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/update-notifier 3.13.0-29-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-29-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-update-grub 3.13.0-29-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-29-generic /usr/sbin/grub-mkconfig: 14: /etc/default/grub: nouveau.modeset=0: not found run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-update-grub exited with return code 127 Failed to process /etc/kernel/postinst.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.13.0-29-generic.postinst line 1025. No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg: error processing package linux-image-3.13.0-29-generic (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-extra-3.13.0-29-generic: linux-image-extra-3.13.0-29-generic depends on linux-image-3.13.0-29-generic; however: Package linux-image-3.13.0-29-generic is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing package linux-image-extra-3.13.0-29-generic (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-generic: linux-image-generic depends on linux-image-3.13.0-29-generic; however: Package linux-image-3.13.0-29-generic is not configured yet. linux-image-generic depends on linux-image-extra-3.13.0-29-generic; however: Package linux-image-extra-3.13.0-29-generic is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing package linux-image-generic (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-generic: linux-generic depends on linux-image-generic (= 3.13.0.29.35); however: Package linux-image-generic is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing package linux-generic (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-extra-3.13.0-27-generic: linux-image-extra-3.13.0-27-generic depends on linux-image-3.13.0-27-generic; however: Package linux-image-3.13.0-27-generic is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing package linux-image-extra-3.13.0-27-generic (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-signed-image-3.13.0-29-generic: linux-signed-image-3.13.0-29-generic depends on linux-image-3.13.0-29-generic (= 3.13.0-29.53); however: Package linux-image-3.13.0-29-generic is not configured yet. linux-signed-image-3.13.0-29-generic depends on linux-image-extra-3.13.0-29-generic (= 3.13.0-29.53); however: Package linux-image-extra-3.13.0-29-generic is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing package linux-signed-image-3.13.0-29-generic (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-signed-image-generic: linux-signed-image-generic depends on linux-signed-image-3.13.0-29-generic; however: Package linux-signed-image-3.13.0-29-generic is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing package linux-signed-image-generic (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-signed-generic: linux-signed-generic depends on linux-signed-image-generic (= 3.13.0.29.35); however: Package linux-signed-image-generic is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing package linux-signed-generic (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-signed-image-3.13.0-27-generic: linux-signed-image-3.13.0-27-generic depends on linux-image-3.13.0-27-generic (= 3.13.0-27.50); however: Package linux-image-3.13.0-27-generic is not configured yet. linux-signed-image-3.13.0-27-generic depends on linux-image-extra-3.13.0-27-generic (= 3.13.0-27.50); however: Package linux-image-extra-3.13.0-27-generic is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing package linux-signed-image-3.13.0-27-generic (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up libxkbcommon-x11-0:amd64 (0.4.1-0ubuntu1) ... Setting up libqt5gui5:amd64 (5.2.1+dfsg-1ubuntu14.2) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.19-0ubuntu6) ... Errors were encountered while processing: linux-image-3.13.0-27-generic linux-image-3.13.0-29-generic linux-image-extra-3.13.0-29-generic linux-image-generic linux-generic linux-image-extra-3.13.0-27-generic linux-signed-image-3.13.0-29-generic linux-signed-image-generic linux-signed-generic linux-signed-image-3.13.0-27-generic E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

  Read the article

• Java 7 update 6 installation fails on Windows 7 when Chrome is default browser

  - by ali1234

  I am configuring a brand new Lenovo U410 system with Windows 7 Home Premium for a user. I received the system direct from the shop. As part of the configuration I installed Java using the online installer. This worked correctly. Later, due to a mistake I made, I needed to restore the system to factory default. The factory default FORMATS C:\ and puts back (supposedly) the exact factory configuration. However, after doing this, I was no longer able to install Java successfully using the same method I used before. Now, whenever I attempt to use the online Java installer, the following happens. First of all, a window always appears "Welcome to Java", "Downloading Java Installer...". After short time this window disappears and then one of three things happens: The very first time I do this after doing a factory reset, I get a Windows error report, which contains this information: Application Name: JavaSetup7u5.exe Application Version: 7.0.50.6 Application Timestamp: 4feacd84 Fault Module Name: JavaIC.dll Fault Module Version: 9.9.9.9 Fault Module Timestamp: 4f2343d6 Exception Offset: 000052cb Exception Code: c0000417 Exception Data: 00000000 OS Version: 6.1.7600.2.0.0.768.3 Locale ID: 1033 Additional Information 1: 773c Additional Information 2: 773cd78cf06816f8246f359fa270f3bb Additional Information 3: f51a Additional Information 4: f51aaea7d22f36fa9e3a626b5a5cd1c3 2. Subsequent runs produce either this error message: "Error: Java(TM) installer - Downloaded file C:\Users\\AppData\Local\Temp\fx-runtime.exe is corrupt." or Nothing happens at all. I Believe this is a red herring. Running the installer again causes a different error because the files were downloaded and the installer crashed before it could clean up. This isn't the actual problem, as when this happens the installer deletes the downloaded files, and then when you run it for the third time, it downloads everything again and does the javaic.dll crash. I suspect the downloader is appending to the existing files or something, causing the corruption. I have tried all of the above as Administrator and as a normal user. I have tried reseting the system to factory defaults several times. I have tried downloading with Chrome and Internet Explorer 9. I have tried uninstalling all anti-virus software and disabling the windows firewall entirely. The only thing which makes a difference is running the installer in Windows XP compatibility mode, which allows the installation to complete. I know I can workaround this error by using the offline installer so please don't post that as an answer. I am looking for an explanation of the root cause. Additionally, if I use the offline installer, the updater does not work. The updater also does not work if I install in XP mode. The updater fails because it works by just downloading the newest online setup and running it. Also remember that the installers are digitally signed. The signitures verify correctly so there is no way in hell that this is caused by corrupted downloads. Some theories I have: The Java setup files on java.com actually changed in between the first successful install and my later attempts. Seems unlikely as none of the version numbers have changed. However, I have seen a couple of reports of this error which showed up in the past 24 hours. This looks like the most likely explanation right now: http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/1735645 - Oracle released 7 update 6 two days ago. Careful inspection of the installers reveal that they are in fact attempting to download .6, not .5 as the download page claims. Not actually correct. Only the update tool tries to install 7u6. The online installer still tries 7u5. However, 7u6 being released two days ago is too much of a coincidence to ignore. Update: The 7u6 online installer is available from Oracle technetwork. It crashes in exactly the same way. The factory reset software uses GMT-8 and I am on GMT-1. As a result, after factory reset, any software which cares to check would think that the system was restored 7 hours in the future, due to Window's awful policy of storing local time in the system clock. This could be confusing a certificate check or similar. Update: I discovered that this does cause Windows Update to fail. The workaround, setting the clock back before starting factory reset, does not enable Java to install correctly. The factory reset image isn't really the same as what is installed in the main partition when you buy the system. Naughty Lenovo. The installer appears to crash while installing or displaying something to do with the Ask.com toolbar. That seems to be what javaic.dll does. Microsoft Tuesday was the 14th. Some update in that could be causing this. However, I'm factory reseting the machine every time, so unless the patches get slipstreamed into the recovery image, or there is some mechanism by which they get silently installed even if updates are disabled, then I don't see how this can be the cause. Major breakthrough: The default browser on Lenovo systems is Google Chrome. I noticed that the JavaIC.dll "sponsor check" actually does a check on your default browser in order to decide which sponsor ad to display. Normally that would get you the Ask toolbar on IE9. But that toolbar doesn't work on Chrome, and so the installer tries to display a different ad. The different ad is what causes the crash. Changing the default browser to IE9 allows the installer to run correctly. So this looks like a genuine bug in the sponsor ad code in the installer, caused by a combination of Google Chrome default browser and not being in the US. (Installer also checks your location using IP geolocation service and displays different ads based on that.)

  Read the article

• Why does ubuntu have a separate package for unison version 2.27.57?

  - by intuited

  The current ubuntu repo contains an extra set of packages for version 2.27.57 of the unison file sychronization utility: $ aptitude search unison p unison - A file-synchronization tool for Unix and W p unison-gtk - A file-synchronization tool for Unix and W p unison2.27.57 - A file-synchronization tool for Unix and W p unison2.27.57-gtk - A file-synchronization tool for Unix and W $ aptitude show '~nunison[^-]*$' | grep 'Package\|Version' Package: unison Version: 2.32.52-1ubuntu2 Package: unison2.27.57 Version: 2.27.57-2 What is the reason for this? Are there backwards incompatibilities in more recent versions of unison?

  Read the article

• What package is meant to replace thinkfinger in 11.10?

  - by misterhaan

  My laptop has a fingerprint reader that until 11.10 I used via thinkfinger. That package is no longer in the repositories, but I assume there’s a different package meant to support fingerprint readers in thinkfinger’s place. What is the recommended fingerprint reader package? Should I just find thinkfinger on my own and use that instead? Here’s my reader’s lsusb output: Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0483:2016 SGS Thomson Microelectronics Fingerprint Reader

  Read the article

• What package do I need to build a Qt 5 & CMake application?

  - by Kevin Reid

  I'm trying to build sdrangelove, which wants Qt 5 and uses CMake for its build system, on Ubuntu 13.10. What package do I need to install to give it the file it's asking for here? There are a lot of *qt5* packages, and I've tried installing the promising looking ones to no effect. All the discussions I've found either have things working fine or are talking about writing CMake build rules rather than executing them. I don't have a lot of experience with the organization of Debian/Ubuntu packaging. CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:14 (find_package): By not providing "FindQt5Core.cmake" in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH this project has asked CMake to find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5Core", but CMake did not find one. Could not find a package configuration file provided by "Qt5Core" (requested version 5.0) with any of the following names: Qt5CoreConfig.cmake qt5core-config.cmake Add the installation prefix of "Qt5Core" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or set "Qt5Core_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above files. If "Qt5Core" provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure it has been installed.

  Read the article

• Virtualbox will run from 32bit installation CD but not 64bit.

  - by MetaDark

  I am trying to set up Windows in Virtual Box, so I don't need to reboot in the rare occasion that I actually need it. The problem is, Virtual Box doesn't preform any errors when I insert the 32bit installation CD but when I try to use the 64bit installation; What!? I am already using the installation disc! I've checked my BIOS to see if I have SVM (AMD's version of VT) disabled and all I see is "Enabled" I have a K9N6PGM2-V2 motherboard A Triple Core AMD Athlon II A Nvdia NForce 430 integrated graphics card 4GB of RAM An 80GB IDE And a 1TB SATA I don't think the last three specifications matter but just in case XP I am pretty sure the CD isn't broken ( I am going to make sure in just a moment ), what could be the cause to this problem? Edit: The 64bit installation CD is not broken, but I found out when trying to install from the 32bit version that it's trying to upgrade, not preform a fresh install - Odd.

  Read the article

• Ask HTG: How Can I Check the Age of My Windows Installation?

  - by Jason Fitzpatrick

  Curious about when you installed Windows and how long you’ve been chugging along without a system refresh? Read on as we show you a simple way to see how long-in-the-tooth your Windows installation is. Dear How-To Geek, It feels like it has been forever since I installed Windows 7 and I’m starting to wonder if some of the performance issues I’m experiencing have something to do with how long ago it was installed. It isn’t crashing or anything horrible, mind you, it just feels slower than it used to and I’m wondering if I should reinstall it to wipe the slate clean. Is there a simple way to determine the original installation date of Windows on its host machine? Sincerely, Worried in Windows Although you only intended to ask one question, you actually asked two. Your direct question is an easy one to answer (how to check the Windows installation date). The indirect question is, however, a little trickier (if you need to reinstall Windows to get a performance boost). Let’s start off with the easy one: how to check your installation date. Windows includes a handy little application just for the purposes of pulling up system information like the installation date, among other things. Open the Start Menu and type cmd in the run box (or, alternatively, press WinKey+R to pull up the run dialog and enter the same command). At the command prompt, type systeminfo.exe Give the application a moment to run; it takes around 15-20 seconds to gather all the data. You’ll most likely need to scroll back up in the console window to find the section at the top that lists operating system stats. What you care about is Original Install Date: We’ve been running the machine we tested the command on since August 23 2009. For the curious, that’s one month and a day after the initial public release of Windows 7 (after we were done playing with early test releases and spent a month mucking around in the guts of Windows 7 to report on features and flaws, we ran a new clean installation and kept on trucking). Now, you might be asking yourself: Why haven’t they reinstalled Windows in all that time? Haven’t things slowed down? Haven’t they upgraded hardware? The truth of the matter is, in most cases there’s no need to completely wipe your computer and start from scratch to resolve issues with Windows and, if you don’t bog your system down with unnecessary and poorly written software, things keep humming along. In fact, we even migrated this machine from a traditional mechanical hard drive to a newer solid-state drive back in 2011. Even though we’ve tested piles of software since then, the machine is still rather clean because 99% of that testing happened in a virtual machine. That’s not just a trick for technology bloggers, either, virtualizing is a handy trick for anyone who wants to run a rock solid base OS and avoid the bog-down-and-then-refresh cycle that can plague a heavily used machine. So while it might be the case that you’ve been running Windows 7 for years and heavy software installation and use has bogged your system down to the point a refresh is in order, we’d strongly suggest reading over the following How-To Geek guides to see if you can’t wrangle the machine into shape without a total wipe (and, if you can’t, at least you’ll be in a better position to keep the refreshed machine light and zippy): HTG Explains: Do You Really Need to Regularly Reinstall Windows? PC Cleaning Apps are a Scam: Here’s Why (and How to Speed Up Your PC) The Best Tips for Speeding Up Your Windows PC Beginner Geek: How to Reinstall Windows on Your Computer Everything You Need to Know About Refreshing and Resetting Your Windows 8 PC Armed with a little knowledge, you too can keep a computer humming along until the next iteration of Windows comes along (and beyond) without the hassle of reinstalling Windows and all your apps.         

  Read the article

• How to force remove a package if dpkg removal script fails?

  - by fodon

  I'm trying to remove a package where I deleted the /etc/init.d/disco-master file (in an attempt to remove the package manually). I want to remove the disco-master package. How do I do this now? This is what happens when I do sudo apt-get remove disco-master: removing disco-master ... invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/disco-master not found. dpkg: error processing disco-master (--remove): subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 100 Errors were encountered while processing: disco-master E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) When I do sudo apt-get install --reinstall disco-master I get the following: You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: disco-master : Depends: disco-node (= 0.4.2+nmu1) but it is not going to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). When I do sudo apt-get -f install I get this: Unpacking disco-node (from .../disco-node_0.4.2+nmu1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/disco-node_0.4.2+nmu1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/disco/master/ebin/disco.app', which is also in package disco-master 0.4.1 No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/disco-node_0.4.2+nmu1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) When I run sudo apt-get remove disco-node I get the following: Package disco-node is not installed, so not removed You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: disco-master : Depends: disco-node (= 0.4.1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: python-disco (= 0.4.1) but 0.4.2+nmu1 is to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). When I did sudo dpkg -P --force-all disco-master I got: Removing disco-master ... invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/disco-master not found. dpkg: error processing disco-master (--purge): subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 100 Errors were encountered while processing: disco-master

  Read the article

• Can't install lib32ncurses5-dev or ia32-libs

  - by tito_drum

  I'm trying to install Android source and I keep getting this error. I kept with the installation but seems these packages are sort of required to have a complete and successful installation. this is my error Package lib32ncurses5-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source Package ia32-libs is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source E: Package 'lib32ncurses5-dev' has no installation candidate E: Package 'ia32-libs' has no installation candidate E: Unable to locate package lib32readline5-dev E: Unable to locate package lib32z-dev I have a VM with Ubuntu on Intel® Core™ i5-2300 CPU @ 2.80GHz and 32-bit system

  Read the article

• Why does 'quickly package' fail with "An error has occurred when creating debian packaging"?

  - by slashcrack

  I've got a big problem with packing my quickly application for the Ubuntu App Showdown. When I try to package or submit my application, I get some warnings: quickly package ........ ---------------------------------- WARNING: syntax errors in facebook/FacebookWindow.py: encoding declaration in Unicode string (FacebookWindow.py, line 0) WARNING: the following files are not recognized by DistUtilsExtra.auto: AUTHORS~ facebook/AboutFacebookDialog.py~ facebook/FacebookWindow.py~ facebook/PreferencesFacebookDialog.py~ facebook/__init__.py~ facebook_lib/AboutDialog.py~ facebook_lib/Builder.py~ facebook_lib/PreferencesDialog.py~ facebook_lib/Window.py~ facebook_lib/__init__.py~ facebook_lib/facebookconfig.py~ facebook_lib/helpers.py~ setup.py~ ---------------------------------- An error has occurred when creating debian packaging ERROR: can't create or update ubuntu package ERROR: package command failed Aborting What does the second warning mean? How do I solve those warnings? I want to submit my app to the Ubuntu App developer Showdown into my PPA and it doesn't work. Thanks for any answer.

  Read the article

• Package denyhosts in Ubuntu Trusty Tahr is deleted: temporary or forever?

  - by Kees van Dieren

  While doing a test-upgrade of our Ubuntu server to 14.04, I found that the package DenyHosts is no longer available. Installing it gives following error: apt-get install denyhosts Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package denyhosts Apparently it has been deleted, according to launchpad. Will Denyhosts be available in the final release of Ubuntu 14.04?

  Read the article

• How do I get the name of a package, modify and install it?

  - by Ken

  I'm not very familiar with Ubuntu or Linux, but I'm a programmer, and some people told me that you can just go ahead and modify your system. So my question is, how do you go on about that? For instance, If I'm interested in modifying the behavior of the button or the desktop icons, or whatever it is: How do I get the source code? I guess I need the package name and download it. But how can I get the package name? Let's say I want the button package, where do I look to get the package name? is there a list on a website or a help file? Once I modify it, how can I replace the original with the new one? P.S. I had some troubles finding the right tags, feel free to edit them

  Read the article

• Windows 8.1 RT de retour sur le Windows Store, Microsoft corrige l'erreur qui empêchait l'installation de l'OS

  Windows 8.1 RT de retour sur le Windows Store Microsoft corrige l'erreur qui empêchait l'installation de l'OS Mise à jour du 23/10/13Les utilisateurs de tablettes sur Windows 8.1 peuvent reprendre avec le téléchargement et l'installation de la mise à jour Windows 8.1 RT sur leur dispositif.La mise à jour avait été retirée du Windows Store suite à un bogue pouvant entrainer l'échec de l'installation de Windows 8.1 sur certains dispositifs et l'affichage de l'écran bleu.Microsoft avait indiqué...

  Read the article

• Eclipse will not show 2.3 emulator for android compatibility package code

  - by Mark Lasby

  I am trying to learn fragments to modernize an app I originally wrote for android 1.5 that uses Date Picker Dialog. I am using the android-support-v4 library. When I run the code in Eclipse Juno 20120614-1722 it only shows android 4.0 emulators and there is a red X beside my Samsung phone running 2.3.5. When I push the package to phone, the code runs. Here is the code FragTestActivity.java package xyz.marklasby.fragtest; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; import java.util.Calendar; import android.app.DatePickerDialog; import android.os.Bundle; import android.support.v4.app.DialogFragment; import android.support.v4.app.FragmentActivity; import android.view.View; import android.widget.Button; import android.widget.DatePicker; public class FragTestActivity extends FragmentActivity { private Button date; private Calendar now; private SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat(" EEE MMM dd/yyyy"); @Override public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.main); date = (Button) findViewById(R.id.setdate); now = Calendar.getInstance(); date.setText(sdf.format(now.getTime())); date.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(View v) { editDate(v); } }); } public void editDate(View v) { DialogFragment newFragment = DatePickerFragment.newInstance(new DatePickerDialog.OnDateSetListener() { @Override public void onDateSet(DatePicker view, int year, int monthOfYear, int dayOfMonth) { now.set(year, monthOfYear, dayOfMonth); date.setText(sdf.format(now.getTime())); } }); newFragment.show(getSupportFragmentManager(), "datePicker"); } } DatePickerFragment.java package xyz.marklasby.fragtest; import java.util.Calendar; import android.app.DatePickerDialog; import android.app.Dialog; import android.os.Bundle; import android.support.v4.app.DialogFragment; public class DatePickerFragment extends DialogFragment { static DatePickerDialog.OnDateSetListener mListener; public static DatePickerFragment newInstance(DatePickerDialog.OnDateSetListener listener) { mListener = listener; return new DatePickerFragment(); } @Override public Dialog onCreateDialog(Bundle savedInstanceState) { final Calendar c = Calendar.getInstance(); int year = c.get(Calendar.YEAR); int month = c.get(Calendar.MONTH); int day = c.get(Calendar.DAY_OF_MONTH); return new DatePickerDialog(getActivity(), mListener, year, month, day); } } Manifest.xml <manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android" package="xyz.marklasby.fragtest" android:versionCode="1" android:versionName="1.0" > <uses-sdk android:minSdkVersion="8" android:targetSdkVersion="15" /> <application android:icon="@drawable/ic_launcher" android:label="@string/app_name" android:theme="@style/AppTheme" > <activity android:name=".FragTestActivity" android:label="@string/title_activity_frag_test" > <intent-filter> <action android:name="android.intent.action.MAIN" /> <category android:name="android.intent.category.LAUNCHER" /> </intent-filter> </activity> </application> </manifest> What am I doing wrong?

  Read the article

• How do I solve "Two different CRTLDLLs are loaded" when using packages in C++ Builder 2010?

  - by David M

  Hi, We are trying to split up our monolithic EXE into a combination of an EXE and several packages. So far, we have one package that we're trying to use, and when running the EXE Codeguard shows the following error on startup: CG Error Two different CRTLDLLs are loaded. CG might report false errors (C:\Windows\system32\CC32100MT.DLL) (D:\Projects\Foo\Bar.bpl) OK I read this as two different runtime libraries being loaded - one, the correct one (CC32100MT.dll), one incorrect, which is the package we're trying to use. Continuing to run the program shows odd errors, especially casting between classes or passing a pointer to a class as a parameter in a method that crosses the EXE/DLL boundary. Codeguard itself doesn't show any other errors at all though. How do we solve this? Some more details We've looked at as many things as we (the developer working on this and I) can collectively think of: Each project is built using runtime packages. The EXE host lists Bar in its package list. Each project is set to compile with dynamic RTL. However, changing this does not solve the problem. The package is linked to the EXE via its BPI file, but linking via a LIB makes no difference either. The EXE and BPL are compiled with the same project settings, where the same options exist for both types of project. We think, anyway :) There is only one copy of the BPL and BPI on the system: it's definitely linking to the right one. Examining the EXE and BPL with Depends and TDump show they are both using C:\Windows\system32\CC32100MT.DLL. They should both be using the one RTL. Creating a new project (a plain VCL forms application) and linking to the BPL (via its BPI) works fine. Something in the process of adding all the files and LIBs that make our EXE contain the code it needs to changes this, but we haven't been able to figure out what. The LIBs all either correspond to DLLs we use (flat C interface, usually look as though they were built with MSVC) or are simple projects with lots of related files, compiled to a lib for the purpose of linking into the EXE - these correspond roughly to the areas of the program we want to split to BPLs, by the way. There don't seem to be project options for the LIB projects that would affect RTL linking, unless we've missed them. I have exhaustively hunted through Depends and looked at all RTL and CC32*.dll files the EXE and every single DLL references. All are identical: rtl140.bpl and CC32100MT.DLL. Fully qualified paths show they are the same files, too. Everything should be using the one same run-time library. We're stumped. Absolutely stumped. We've had other problems using BPLs (they seem to be surprisingly tricky things, especially using C++) but have managed to solve them all. This one we've had no luck at all and we'd really appreciate any insights :) We're using C++Builder 2010 (as part of RAD Studio actually, but with little Delphi code apart from components.)

  Read the article

• How to get httrack to work with SSL on mac os x? (libssl.so not found)

  - by cwd

  I'm trying to use httrack website copier but the program is running and reporting "no-ssl" (ie: it does not have the capability to copy secure sites). From looking over this thread, it seems that the problem is either when I make & configure the program, or when I run the program, it is not finding the lib-ssl / open-ssl that I have installed. I think it is looking for /var/root/lib/libssl.so.1.0 The user on that forum states that he created a symlink which allowed httrack to find the ssl library in the non-default location. Perhaps that's what I need to do - but where do I create the link from and to? I'm not seeing that I have any libssl.so files installed on my system. Do I need the development package? If so, how do I install that? I used macports to install the current version of openssl that I have. I'm running OS X 10.6. Reserch I have run this command to try and debug: dtruss httrack 2&1 | grep ssl and that outputs this: stat64("libssl.so.1.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.1.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.1.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.1\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.1\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.1\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.1\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.1.0.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.8p\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8p\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8p\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8p\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.8o\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8o\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8o\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8o\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.8n\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8n\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8n\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8n\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.8m\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8m\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8m\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8m\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.8l\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8l\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8l\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8l\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.8k\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8k\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8k\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8k\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.8j\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8j\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8j\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8j\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.8g\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8g\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8g\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8g\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.8b\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8b\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8b\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8b\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.8\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.7\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.7\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so.0.9.6\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF210, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("libssl.so\0", 0x7FFF5FBFEE30, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/var/root/lib/libssl.so\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/local/lib/libssl.so\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 stat64("/usr/lib/libssl.so\0", 0x7FFF5FBFF220, 0x7FFF5FBFF470) = -1 Err#2 I have already used mac ports to install open-ssl: port installed The following ports are currently installed: beecrypt @4.2.1_2 (active) cpio @2.10_0 (active) expat @2.0.1_1 (active) flex @2.5.35_0 (active) gettext @0.18.1.1_2 (active) gperf @3.0.4_0 (active) icu @4.6_0 (active) libiconv @1.13.1_0 (active) mysql5 @5.1.53_0 (active) ncurses @5.9_0 (active) ncursesw @5.8_0 (active) neon @0.29.5_0 (active) openssl @1.0.0c_0 (active) perl5.8 @5.8.9_3 (active) popt @1.16_0 (active) python24 @2.4.6_7 (active) readline @6.1.002_0 (active) rpm @4.4.9_10 (active) sqlite3 @3.7.3_0 (active) zlib @1.2.5_0 (active) Here are the install locations: locate libssl /opt/local/lib/libssl.1.0.0.dylib /opt/local/lib/libssl.a /opt/local/lib/libssl.dylib /opt/local/lib/pkgconfig/libssl.pc /opt/local/var/macports/software/openssl/1.0.0c_0/opt/local/lib/libssl.1.0.0.dylib /opt/local/var/macports/software/openssl/1.0.0c_0/opt/local/lib/libssl.a /opt/local/var/macports/software/openssl/1.0.0c_0/opt/local/lib/libssl.dylib /opt/local/var/macports/software/openssl/1.0.0c_0/opt/local/lib/pkgconfig/libssl.pc /usr/lib/libssl.0.9.7.dylib /usr/lib/libssl.0.9.8.dylib /usr/lib/libssl.0.9.dylib /usr/lib/libssl.dylib /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libssl.pc What should I do next? More Info I tried the solution below: $ DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES="/opt/local/lib/libssl.1.0.0.dylib" httrack Welcome to HTTrack Website Copier (Offline Browser) 3.44-1-nossl Copyright (C) Xavier Roche and other contributors To see the option list, enter a blank line or try httrack --help It is still not able to load the ssl lib: 3.44-1-nossl

  Read the article

• SQL Server 2008 Express w/Adv Services Command Line Install

  - by RobC

  I'm attempting to include an install of SQL Server 2008 Express w/Adv. Services with an installation package, but am having a heck of a time getting the installation to complete. Typically, this installation will take place on brand-new servers that get shipped to new customers, but this won't always be the case: Sometimes, the installation will take place on machines already in use, and so I've been told the installer has to work for XP x86 and x64 and Win 7 x32 and x64. The command line I'm passing in is: setup.exe /ACTION=INSTALL /INSTANCENAME="MSSQLSERVER" /HIDECONSOLE /QS /FEATURES="SQLENGINE" "REPLICATION" "FULLTEXT" "RS" "BIDS" "SSMS" "SNAC_SDK" "OCS" /SECURITYMODE=SQL /SAPWD="aStrongPassword" /NPENABLED=1 /TCPENABLED=1 /SQLSYSADMINACCOUNTS="%USERDOMAIN%\Administrator" SQLSVCACCOUNT="NT AUTHORITY\Network Service" (This is only my most recent attempt, in which I used a SQLSYSADMINACCOUNTS value that I saw in a posting elsewhere on this site. I've tried lots of combinations from various sites.) The SQL installer's Summary.txt begins: Exit code (Decimal): -2068578304 Exit facility code: 1204 Exit error code: 0 Exit message: The specified credentials that were provided for the SQL Server service are not valid. To continue, provide a valid account and password for the SQL Server service. This seems simple enough to fix (and maybe I"m overlooking something obvious), which is why it's driving me nuts. If any of you have any suggestions, I'd appreciate it. (I've got to take off for the weekend, so don't interpret my delayed response as a lack of interest.) Thanks.

  Read the article

• Windows cannot determine which language to install ?

  - by Mohammad

  I'm gonna install Windows Server 2008 SP2 on VMware Workstation 7.0.1 build-227600. But in installation I receive the following error and Windows doesn't continue installing procedure. Windows cannot determine which language to install ? What's wrong with it? Could you please guide me? Thanks.

  Read the article

• Error installing Visual Studio 2008 - Cannot copy: DW20.EXE

  - by Curt

  I'm attempting to install Visual Studio 2008 Professional from an ISO file downloaded from the msdn site, using DAEMON Tools Lite to Mount. On installation I'm getting the following error: Setup has encountered a problem while trying to copy: F:\Setup\VSSetupWatson\DW20.EXE I've had a look online for a solution and was recommended to reboot my system, however this has not helped. Why is this happening and how can I resolve the setup error?

  Read the article

• How can I upgrade Vista Home to Vista Ultimate without Anytime Upgrade DVD

  - by adriangrigore

  Hi, I'd like to upgrade Vista home to vista Ultimate on my desktop computer. I have a MSDN subscription, which means I can download just about every microsoft software there is. However, there doesn't seem to be any vista anytime upgrade DVD available in the MSDN downloads section. Is there any way to upgrade using the regular Vista Ultimate installation disc without performing a clean install?

  Read the article

• How to install GNU make in Windows 7?

  - by Azhar

  I am trying to install GNU make-3.82 on Windows 7. I downloaded the make-3.82.tar.gz setup but it does not have any setup file. There is process given on GNU site. But when I reach to the folder in command prompt and after extraction write ./configure it throws error is not recognized as internal or an external command, operable program or batch file. The installation procedure is given below but not able to understand how to make it. please help

  Read the article

• How to install GNU make in Windows 7? [closed]

  - by Azhar

  I am trying to install GNU make-3.82 on Windows 7. I downloaded the make-3.82.tar.gz setup but it does not have any setup file. There is process given on GNU site. But when I reach to the folder in command prompt and after extraction write ./configure it throws error is not recognized as internal or an external command, operable program or batch file. The installation procedure is given below but not able to understand how to make it. please help

  Read the article

• ltsp-built-client error

  - by sat

  I am facing some issues while building a thin client using the ltsp-build-client, it says an error. Error is: I: Retrieving Release E: Failed getting release file file://root/ISO/ubuntu-12.04.1-desktop-i386.iso/dists/squeeze/Release error: LTSP client installation ended abnormally My Command is: ltsp-build-client --mirror file://root/ISO/ubuntu-12.04.1-desktop-i386.iso --security-mirror none --accept-unsigned-packages I am referring this URL http://wiki.debian.org/LTSP/Howto. How to solve this error?

  Read the article

• Hanging on "Scanning for Harddisk partitions and creating /etc/fstab" when trying to install Damn Sm

  - by 7777

  Following a suggestion made before, I'm trying to use UNetbootin to install Damn Small Linux on a Windows computer. I'd like to reformat the entire HD and install Linux on it. I installed UNetbootin on Windows, set it for a frugal install on the HD, rebooted, started it up in UNetbootin. It seemed to be working ok. However, the installation keeps hanging on "Scanning for Harddisk partitions and creating /etc/fstab". What might be the problem?

  Read the article

• How to format new HDD windows XP

  - by c0mrade

  I just bought new SATA 1TB Baracuda HDD, I inserted and my windows didn't recognize it. Because I didn't have any other OS or anything to format it I used Centos i386 installation to format it. I of course disconnected my original disk from the motherboard and formatted it using CENTOS.. but now when I come back to the windows I can't format this HDD. Its recognized as RAW. What can I do to make it work?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117  | Next Page >