Search Results

Search found 7987 results on 320 pages for 'profile provider'.

Page 110/320 | < Previous Page | 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117  | Next Page >

  • Link Building For Search Visibility

    Ask any proficient search engine optimization (SEO) practitioner, and you will learn that building links to your website is one of most significant methods to use, and also one of the most confusing. For example, you might be told that not all links are equal, and you have to learn about concepts like nofollow, link trust, link density, link popularity, and PageRank (PR). Managing the link profile is not exactly rocket science, but it is not simple either. Here are three main guidelines you can follow.

    Read the article

  • The Genius of Website Creators

    This is an age where the internet rules the trend of the commercial world. When you decide to buy a product or even take the assistance of a service provider the first thing that would come to mind is looking over the internet and searching for the same.

    Read the article

  • Search Engine Optimization - What is It?

    Search Engine Optimization or SEO, refers to the active practice of optimizing a web site through various techniques, in order to increase the traffic a website receives from search engines such as Google. When looking for a product, business or service provider, it is now as easy as typing in some key words into the search engine and getting instant results.

    Read the article

  • SEO Reports - The Importance of Having Proper Reporting

    SEO is a very dynamic and complex process and as important it is for a company to provide the service it is equally important to report it correctly because a webmaster can only know what's going on if he/she gets a detailed report of the status. In case you are opting for an SEO provider it is crucial for you to know the update on the task and therefore reporting becomes a core aspect of an SEO service.

    Read the article

  • For SEO, There's No Place Like Home - Or is There?

    Agencies specialising in online marketing solutions set particular stock in their linking strategies. Good inbound and internal links can work wonders for your link profile; let us fill you in on some of the reasons why a good links strategy is valuable to every priority landing page, not just the home page.

    Read the article

  • How Web 2.0 Backlinks Work

    Building Backlinks is an effective SEO technique that many marketers are using. You can gain backlinks from web 2.0 properties, profile websites, post distribution internet sites, discussion boards and forums, weblogs, or other web sites.

    Read the article

  • Dental SEO - What Exactly Are Discount Dental Plans?

    A dental plan is a type of club you join where we have a portion of providers and consumers. In a discounted plan, the providers have agreed to supply the services at a discounted rate. Being a consumer, one simply has to display his or her membership card while visiting the service provider. These types of discounted plans do not purport to insurance in any way, they're just discount programs.

    Read the article

  • LogonUser function (2 replies)

    I am trying to access a server using LogonUser function as follows Dim returnValue As Boolean LogonUser(Domain\UserName, MachineName, password, LOGON32 LOGON NEW CREDENTIALS, LOGON32 PROVIDER DEFAULT, tokenHandle) I get a token, and seems to me that I get authenticated. However when I execute the following Dim AllCountersCategories As PerformanceCounterCategory() PerformanceCounterCategory.GetCate...

    Read the article

  • What does this SAP error mean? recv104 NiIReadrecv nixxi.cp5087

    - by Techboy
    I have an SAP BI Portal system and an SAP BW system. In the Visual Administrator of the BI Portal, section 'JCo RFC Provider' I have created some RFC listeners. In the SAP BW system (in transaction SM59), I have created, tested and activated the relevant RFC connections. When I start a JCo RFC Provider in the BI Portal the BW system that it communicates with produces these errors (displayed from SAP transaction SM21): Operating system call recv failed (error no. 104 ) Module nam Line Error text Caller.... Reason/cal nixxi.cp 5087 recv104 NiIRead recv Documentation for system log message Q0 I : The specified operating system call was returned with an error. For communication calls (receive, send, etc) often the cause of errors are network problems. It could also be a configuration problem at operating system level. (file cannot be opened, no space in the file system etc.). Additional specifications for error number 104 Name for errno number E_UNKNOWN_NO The meaning of the value stored in 'errno' is platform-dependent. The value which occurred here is unknown to the SysLog system. Either there is an incorrect error number in the SysLog message, or the tables TSLE2 or TSLE3 are not completely maintained. Technical details File Offset RecFm System log type Grp N variable message data 6 410220 m Error (Function,Module,Row) Q0 I recv104 NiIReadrecv nixxi.cp5087 There is plenty of space left in the file system, the servers can ping each other and there is no firewall between the servers. The tables (TSLE2 or TSLE3) mentioned in the error message do not provide any additional information. Please can you tell me if this error message refers to something specific, or if it is generic: recv104 NiIReadrecv nixxi.cp5087

    Read the article

  • Linked server problem on SQL Server 2005

    - by BradyKelly
    I have a weird issue and I hope someone can steer me in the right direction for resolving this please. When I execute the following query against a linked server, I get the following error. I can connect to the server in SSMS as a separate server, and execute a similar query against its Deposits table. The nn.nn is my own replacement to avoid broadcasting our server addresses. The query: select td.Batch , td.DateTimeDeposited from Deposits cd left join [172.nn.nn.32\sqlexpress].Terminal.dbo.Deposits td on cd.DateTimeDeposited = td.DateTimeDeposited The error: OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "172.nn.nn.11\sqlexpress" returned message "Login timeout expired". OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "172.nn.nn.11\sqlexpress" returned message "An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections.". Msg 65535, Level 16, State 1, Line 0 SQL Network Interfaces: Error Locating Server/Instance Specified [xFFFFFFFF]. Notice how the error is about server 172.nn.nn.11 and not 172.nn.nn.32. SOLVED (STUPID ME): Somebody had added an extra bit to my query that was scrolled off-screen and was querying the 17.nn.nn.11 server.

    Read the article

  • Event ID: 861 - The Windows Firewall has detected an application listening for incoming traffic

    - by Chris Marisic
    Firstly, my machines aren't compromised any person suggesting such will be DV'd. The security logs on some of my networks client machines (all Windows Xp Sp3) get filled with these useless error messages. Security Failure Audit Detailed Tracking Event ID: 861 User: NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE The Windows Firewall has detected an application listening for incoming traffic. Name: - Path: C:\WINDOWS\system32\svchost.exe Process identifier: 976 User account: NETWORK SERVICE User domain: NT AUTHORITY Service: Yes RPC server: No IP version: IPv4 IP protocol: UDP Port number: 55035 Allowed: No User notified: No It's always on various random ports of UDP so setting up a port exception isn't really an option. It's always from svchost or lsass both of which are running services from DLLs. One of the most offending processes seems to the be DnsCache. I have in my global policy under AT < Network < Network Connection < Widnows Firewall < Domain Profile (I haven't changed any standard profile options do both need configured? To allow remote administration and desktop exceptions and have a custom program exception list that has %SystemRoot%\system32\svchost.exe:*:enabled:svchost (Windows won't allow you to add this exception on a local machine but it let me have it on here in the global policy it just doesn't seem to do anything) %SystemRoot%\system32\lsass.exe:*enabled:lsass (I think this one ended all of my LSASS messages) %SystemRoot%\system32\dnsrslvr.dll:*:enabled:dnscache (I tried adding the dll itself to the exception list, this didn't seem to do anything) Is there really any other options left other than disabling the Windows Firewall entirely, disabling auditing entirely or just changing the event viewer to just auto overwrite when needed? I'd much rather fix the problem and get rid of these entries ever being created instead of just trying to cover up the problem.

    Read the article

  • Cmdlets for AD CS deployment: Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority cmdlet failing when attempting to install an offline policy CA

    - by red888
    I installed an offline root CA without issue using this command: Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority ` -OverwriteExistingKey ` <#In the case of a re-installation#> ` -AllowAdministratorInteraction ` -CACommonName ` "LAB Corporate Root CA" ` -CADistinguishedNameSuffix ` 'O=LAB Inc.,C=US' ` -CAType ` StandaloneRootCA ` -CryptoProviderName ` "RSA#Microsoft Software Key Storage Provider" ` -HashAlgorithmName ` SHA256 ` -KeyLength ` 2048 ` -ValidityPeriod ` Years ` -ValidityPeriodUnits ` 20 ` -DatabaseDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertDB' ` -LogDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertLog' ` -Verbose I installed the root CA's cert and CRl on the policy CA, installed the AD CS binaries, and attempted to run this command to install the policy CA and export a req file: Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority ` -OverwriteExistingKey ` <#In the case of a re-installation#> ` -AllowAdministratorInteraction ` -CACommonName ` "LAB Corporate Policy Internal CA" ` -CADistinguishedNameSuffix ` 'O=LAB Inc.,C=US' ` -CAType ` StandaloneSubordinateCA ` -ParentCA ` rootca ` -OutputCertRequestFile ` 'e:\polca-int.req' ` -CryptoProviderName ` "RSA#Microsoft Software Key Storage Provider" ` -HashAlgorithmName ` SHA256 ` -KeyLength ` 2048 ` -ValidityPeriod ` Years ` -ValidityPeriodUnits ` 10 ` -DatabaseDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertDB' ` -LogDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertLog' ` -Verbose When doing this I receive the following error: VERBOSE: Calling InitializeDefaults method on the setup object. Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority : At line:1 char:1 + Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority ` + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + CategoryInfo : InvalidArgument: (:) [Install-AdcsCertificationA uthority], CertificationAuthoritySetupException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : ValidateParameters,Microsoft.CertificateServices .Deployment.Commands.CA.InstallADCSCertificationAuthority Is there a parameter I am entering incorrectly or something?

    Read the article

  • Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement during installation

    - by dbdev1
    I am running Windows Server 2008 Standard Edition R2 x64 and I installed SQL Server 2008 Developer Edition. All of the preliminary checks run fine (Apart from a warning about Windows Firewall and opening ports which is unrelated to this and shouldn't be an issue - I can open those ports). Half way through the actual installation, I get a popup with this error: Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement. The installation still runs to completion when I press ok. However, at the end, it states that the following services "failed": database engine services sql server replication full-text search reporting services How do I know if this actually means that anything from my installation (which is on a clean Windows Server setup - nothing else on there, no previous SQL Servers, no upgrades, etc) is missing? I know from my programming experience that locks are for concurrency control and the Microsoft help on this issue points to changing my query's lock/transactions in a certain way to fix the issue. But I am not touching any queries? Also, now that I have installed the app, when I login, I keep getting this message: TITLE: Connect to Server ------------------------------ Cannot connect to MSSQLSERVER. ------------------------------ ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 67) For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=67&LinkId=20476 ------------------------------ BUTTONS: OK ------------------------------ I went into the Configuration Manager and enabled named pipes and restarted the service (this is something I have done before as this message is common and not serious). I have disabled Windows Firewall temporarily. I have checked the instance name against the error logs. Please advise on both of these errors. I think these two errors are related. Thanks

    Read the article

  • OpenLDAP mirror mode replication failing with TLS behind a load balancer

    - by Lynn Owens
    I have two OpenLDAP servers that are both running TLS. They are: ldap1.mydomain.com ldap2.mydomain.com I also have a load balancer cluster with a dns name of it's own: ldap.mydomain.com The SSL certificate has a CN of ldap.mydomain.com, with SANs of ldap1.mydomain.com and ldap2.mydomain.com. Everything works... Except mirror mode replication. My mirror mode replication is setup like this: ldap.conf TLS_REQCERT allow cn=config.ldif olcServerID: 1 ldap://ldap1.mydomain.com olcServerID: 2 ldap://ldap2.mydomain.com On ldap1, olcDatabase{1}hdb.ldif olcMirrorMode: TRUE olcSyncrepl: {0}rid=001 provider=ldap://ldap2.mydomain.com bindmethod=simple bindmethod=simple binddn="cn=me,dc=mydomain,dc=com" credentials="REDACTED" starttls=yes searchbase="dc=mydomain,dc=com" schemachecking=on type=refreshAndPersist retry="60 +" On ldap2, olcDatabase{1}hdb.ldif olcMirrorMode: TRUE olcSyncrepl: {0}rid=001 provider=ldap://ldap1.mydomain.com bindmethod=simple bindmethod=simple binddn="cn=me,dc=mydomain,dc=com" credentials="REDACTED" starttls=yes searchbase="dc=mydomain,dc=com" schemachecking=on type=refreshAndPersist retry="60 +" Here's the errors I'm getting in syslog: Dec 1 21:05:01 ldap1 slapd[6800]: slap_client_connect: URI=ldap://ldap2.mydomain.com DN="cn=me,dc=mydomain,dc=com" ldap_sasl_bind_s failed (-1) Dec 1 21:05:01 ldap1 slapd[6800]: do_syncrepl: rid=001 rc -1 retrying Dec 1 21:05:08 ldap1 slapd[6800]: conn=1111 fd=20 ACCEPT from IP=ldap.mydomain.com:2295 (IP=ldap1.mydomain.com:636) Dec 1 21:05:08 ldap1 slapd[6800]: conn=1111 fd=20 closed (TLS negotiation failure) Any ideas? I've been working on OpenLdap for way too long now.

    Read the article

  • How to securely enable file sharing over PPTP on Windows 2008 Server

    - by Damage
    I have set up a Windows SBS 2003 domain (LAN) and a stand-alone Windows 2008 Server (web server) at another location (workgroup). I established PPTP VPN connection (SBS dials web server) over which users from LAN should be able to access web server. On web server I enabled TCP/IPv4 and File and Printer sharing protocol. It has a few external addresses (one of them is default) AND one local address (192.x.x.x) assigned to network adapter. Firewall allows port 445 for file sharing. There's the problem - I can not enable web server file shares to be visible to LAN users and ONLY to LAN users: From SBS I can access webserver but I cannot access webserver from LAN workstations (XP, Vista). I have had same configuration - I have just replaced old (web server) Windows 2003 server with 2008 so SBS settings are the same (static route, DNS etc.). How can I enable file sharing on web server for LAN workstations? Now I have opened File and printer sharing to the internet which is of course totaly unsecure. I tried to secure the tunnel so I moved RAS (VPN) connection (Network Center) on web server to "Private" profile and moved firewall port 445 to "Private" profile but suddenly file sharing does not work and I cannot telnet webserver on port 445. How can I secure file sharing so I do not have to open it to the internet?

    Read the article

  • Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement during installation

    - by dbdev1
    Hi, I am running Windows Server 2008 Standard Edition R2 x64 and I installed SQL Server 2008 Developer Edition. All of the preliminary checks run fine (Apart from a warning about Windows Firewall and opening ports which is unrelated to this and shouldn't be an issue - I can open those ports). Half way through the actual installation, I get a popup with this error: Could not continue scan with NOLOCK due to data movement. The installation still runs to completion when I press ok. However, at the end, it states that the following services "failed": database engine services sql server replication full-text search reporting services How do I know if this actually means that anything from my installation (which is on a clean Windows Server setup - nothing else on there, no previous SQL Servers, no upgrades, etc) is missing? I know from my programming experience that locks are for concurrency control and the Microsoft help on this issue points to changing my query's lock/transactions in a certain way to fix the issue. But I am not touching any queries? Also, now that I have installed the app, when I login, I keep getting this message: TITLE: Connect to Server Cannot connect to MSSQLSERVER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 67) For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=67&LinkId=20476 BUTTONS: OK I went into the Configuration Manager and enabled named pipes and restarted the service (this is something I have done before as this message is common and not serious). I have disabled Windows Firewall temporarily. I have checked the instance name against the error logs. Please advise on both of these errors. I think these two errors are related. Thanks

    Read the article

  • PostgreSQL update problems with uuid

    - by kdl
    Hi, I am trying to run yum update on my CentOS 5.2 box and keep getting this message: Missing Dependency: libossp-uuid.so.15 is needed by package postgresql-contrib I ran yum update postgresql separately and now it's 8.3.8. I also downloaded uuid-1.6.2 and built it from source, but I still get the same result. yum update -d6 uuid gives me this at the end: --> Running transaction check ---> Package uuid.i386 0:1.6.1-3.el5.kb set to be updated Checking deps for uuid.i386 0-1.6.1-3.el5.kb - u Checking deps for uuid.i386 0-1.5.1-4.rhel5 - None postgresql-contrib requires: libossp-uuid.so.15 --> Processing Dependency: libossp-uuid.so.15 for package: postgresql-contrib Needed Require is not a package name. Looking up: libossp-uuid.so.15 Potential Provider: uuid.i386 0:1.5.1-4.rhel5 Mode is u for provider of libossp-uuid.so.15: uuid.i386 0:1.5.1-4.rhel5 Mode for pkg providing libossp-uuid.so.15: u Cannot find an update path for dep for: libossp-uuid.so.15 Searching pkgSack for dep: libossp-uuid.so.15 Potential match for libossp-uuid.so.15 from uuid - 1.5.1-4.rhel5.i386 Matched uuid - 1.5.1-4.rhel5.i386 to require for libossp-uuid.so.15 uuid - 1.5.1-4.rhel5.i386 is in providing packages but it is already installed, removing. --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependency Process ending Error: Missing Dependency: libossp-uuid.so.15 is needed by package postgresql-contrib How can I resolve this situation? Thanks

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117  | Next Page >