Search Results

Search found 12705 results on 509 pages for 'ip routing'.

Page 111/509 | < Previous Page | 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118  | Next Page >

  • F5 BIG_IP persistence iRules applied but not affecting selected member

    - by zoli
    I have a virtual server. I have 2 iRules (see below) assigned to it as resources. From the server log it looks like that the rules are running and they select the correct member from the pool after persisting the session (as far as I can tell based on my log messages), but the requests are ultimately directed to somewhere else. Here's how both rules look like: when HTTP_RESPONSE { set sessionId [HTTP::header X-SessionId] if {$sessionId ne ""} { persist add uie $sessionId 3600 log local0.debug "Session persisted: <$sessionId> to <[persist lookup uie $sessionId]>" } } when HTTP_REQUEST { set sessionId [findstr [HTTP::path] "/session/" 9 /] if {$sessionId ne ""} { persist uie $sessionId set persistValue [persist lookup uie $sessionId] log local0.debug "Found persistence key <$sessionId> : <$persistValue>" } } According to the log messages from the rules, the proper balancer members are selected. Note: the two rules can not conflict, they are looking for different things in the path. Those two things never appear in the same path. Notes about the server: * The default load balancing method is RR. * There is no persistence profile assigned to the virtual server. I'm wondering if this should be adequate to enable the persistence, or alternatively, do I have to combine the 2 rules and create a persistence profile with them for the virtual server? Or is there something else that I have missed?

    Read the article

  • How to Access an AWS Instance with RDC when behind a Private Subnet of a VPC

    - by dalej
    We are implementing a typical Amazon VPC with Public and Private Address - with all servers running the Windows platform. The MS SQL instances will be on the private subnet with all IIS/web servers on the public subnet. We have followed the detailed instructions at Scenario 2: VPC with Public and Private Subnets and everything works properly - until the point where you want to set up a Remote Desktop Connection into the SQL server(s) on the private subnet. At this point, the instructions assume you are accessing a server on the public subnet and it is not clear what is required to RDC to a server on a private subnet. It would make sense that some sort of port redirection is necessary - perhaps accessing the EIP of the Nat instance to hit a particular SQL server? Or perhaps use an Elastic Load Balancer (even though this is really for http protocols)? But it is not obvious what additional setup is required for such a Remote Desktop Connection?

    Read the article

  • Host forwarding fails, server is up, domain name tests ambiguous

    - by jayunit100
    I have a domain name registered with http://www.registryrocket.com/ The "main" site, which is called rudolfcode.net, is registered under godaddy, and forwards to a heroku site (rudolfcode.herokuapp.com). I have found that the main site, rudolfcode.net works, but the hostgator forwarding has stopped working (firefox simply fails when you point to http://www.rudolflabs.com, which is the domain name registered by hostgator). How can I debug this issue ? Finally, I have tried to run some DNS tests, and here are the results : Im not sure what the failures mean .... But Im pretty sure that "Conecting to WWW Home Page" failed is a pretty bad sign ! Thanks.

    Read the article

  • What happens when ARP Request comes from a different subnet?

    - by gsinha
    What will happen when an ARP Request packet is sent from router1 to router2 in the following two cases? Will an ARP Reply be generated or the ARP Request packet be dropped? [router1]Intf1(20.0.0.1/24) ======== (40.0.0.1/24)Intf2[router2] [router1]Intf1(20.0.0.1/24) ======== (20.0.0.2/8) Intf2[router2] The topology above have a port "Intf1" on router "router1" connected a port "Intf2" on another router "router2" via a direct link(eg, a 1 Gbps cable).

    Read the article

  • PCs with Wired Connection Keep Losing Internet Connectivity

    - by user717452
    I have a U-verse ATT DSL Internet at our church building. Recently, any computer that is plugged into the network via Ethernet keeps losing its internet connectivity. The setup is from the Modem to a Netgear Wireless Router, and from the router to 3 different computers. None of the laptops that use Wifi ever lose internet, just the wired ones, and I end up having to do ipconfig /release and /renew every day to get it back. One computer has Windows 7 and one has Windows XP. Any ideas as to what is going on with our network?

    Read the article

  • Switches with large MAC address table?

    - by user1290200
    Does anyone know which switches have a large MAC address table ? I see most switches having only 8K, but we need to store way, way more than that (hundreds of K). I know this may seem odd, but trust me, there's no other way we can make our setup work. The only thing we seem to be able to do is install Juniper routers that store up to 1M addresses, but that will get quite costly and we'd rather avoid doing that.

    Read the article

  • Why would you use IPv6 internally?

    - by KCotreau
    Of course, I realize the need to go to IPv6 out on the open Internet since we are running out of addresses, but I really don't understand why there is any need to use it on an internal network. I have done zero with IPv6, so I also wonder: Won't modern firewalls do NAT between internal IPv4 addresses, and external IPv6 addresses? I was just wondering since I have seen so many people struggling with IPv6 questions here, and wonder why bother?

    Read the article

  • Possible to redirect from HTTPS to HTTP behind load-balancer?

    - by Derek Hunziker
    I have a basic ASP.NET application that sits behind an F5 load-balancer. Incoming SSL requests (over HTTPS) terminate at the load-balancer and all internal communication between the load-balancer and my application servers is unsecure (over HTTP). When a unsecure request comes in, my app is able to use Response.Redirect("https://...") to redirect a secure URL with no problems. However, the other direction appears to be impossible - I cannot redirect from HTTPS to HTTP using Response.Redirect() from my application. The URL remains HTTPS for the client and does not change. Could the F5 be preventing the redirect for ever reaching the client? Is there any special configuration necessary to let this happen?

    Read the article

  • forward same port but for two different IPs (cisco)

    - by Colin
    Hi! I have a cisco running IOS 12.0(25) responding to two different IPs addresses: IP_A and IP_B. Behind this router I also have two different servers: server_A and server_B. What I want is to forward port 22 to both servers, so: IP_A, port22 -> server_A, port22 IP_B, port22 -> server_B, port22 ATM this only works for one of them (server_A), this is my config: interface Ethernet0/0 description Internet ip address IP_A 255.255.255.0 ip address IP_B 255.255.255.0 secondary no ip directed-broadcast ip nat outside no ip mroute-cache no cdp enable ip nat pool pool_A IP_A IP_A netmask 255.255.255.0 ip nat pool pool_B IP_B IP_B netmask 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside source list A pool pool_A overload ip nat inside source list B pool pool_B overload ip nat inside source static tcp server_B 22 IP_B 22 extendable ip nat inside source static tcp server_A 22 IP_A 22 extendable access-list A permit server_A access-list B permit server_B

    Read the article

  • 2 Nics - Same Subnet..Route backup traffic through one of them

    - by Matthewhall58
    I have a windows server and a centos linux server. I want the nightly backup file (targz) that copies to the windows machine to use a different nic so that the main nic is not burdenend with moving the large file. Each server has 2 Nics in it. the network is 10.173.10.0 mask 255.255.255.192 Centos Linux Box: Eth0 is configured with 10.173.10.80 mask 255.255.255.192 gw 10.173.10.65 Eth 1 is configured with 10.173.10.71 mask 255.255.255.192 gw 10.173.10.65 Windows Box Eth 0 is 10.173.10.72 mask 255.255.255.192 gw 10.173.10.65 Eth 1 is 10.173.10.70 mask 255.255.255.192 gw 10.173.10.65 I can ping each machine from each machine. On the linux machine I use the command route add -host 10.173.10.70 dev eth1 but then when i ping 10.173.10.70 it is unreachable..... WHY?

    Read the article

  • How can I do a "Coming Soon" redirect on IIS6 for everyone except a couple specific IPs?

    - by colinodell
    We're about to do some major maintanence on an IIS 6 / ASP (Classic) website. We want all visitors to be redirected to a "Coming Soon" page (or something similar). This should NOT apply to our dev team (operating remotely), so we'd want to specify certain IPs that should have access to the under-construction site. How can this be accomplished in IIS 6? (Using classic ASP if needed)

    Read the article

  • how to fight back attacks on my web service

    - by user12145
    My apache webservice is getting a large quantity of requests over the days, each one with somewhat random login to gain access. I identified about 60 such ips(a few sample below), all belong to google. is there a way to find more information about the origin of the attacker? or should I just block these ips. secondly, should I attempt to block the identified ips subnets(74.125.46.*) as a preventive measure? 72.14.194.65 64.233.172.20 74.125.75.19 72.14.194.33 74.125.46.87 74.125.44.91 74.125.46.91

    Read the article

  • Why would one server be sending DUP ACK packets to one PC, which is responding with HTTP RST packets?

    - by IronicMuffin
    I'm not a network profressional, so please excuse any wrong language. I was debugging why my DNS traffic was a constant 160Kbps on our corporate network. I opened up a wireshark trace, and I see one PC of a coworker broadcasting HTTP [RST] packets to one of our DMZ servers at the rate of 1000 a second. He restarted his machine, and as soon as it went offline, the server started broadcasting [DUP] [ACK] packets, until he came back online. It then resumed the HTTP [RST] packets. Apparently this server has been doing this kind of behavior since it went live. I believe it did this with a printer and an access point as well. Can anyone explain why this behavior is occurring? Any solutions? The initial research was done because there have been "bandwidth issues" and I wonder if this is contributing.

    Read the article

  • 1 Computer Pulls Wrong DNS Every Morning

    - by bradenkeith
    One of my users takes his laptop home, connects to his internal network fine. He brings it in every morning and since Monday - every morning it pulls the wrong DNS every time. It pulls 1 DNS: 192.168.1.1 which is the router. The DNS are external IPs. I have several users that take their laptops home and connect to other networks - what could cause this anomaly? He's booting up when he comes in the office and a simple ipconfig /release /renew fixes the issue.

    Read the article

  • Recommend a desktop app to monitor port 80 on servers

    - by busyone
    Hello, I did some googling but was unsuccessful, so I am posting here. I am looking to get an app (preferably free/open source) to monitor my servers on port 80 that would send me an email/text when some predefined timeout triggers. I could probably write something in VB to do this but i am burried with projects, why reinvent the wheel. I know there are services out there that want you to pay $5/month to do so, I was thinking about a Windows app that would sit on my computer and simply monitor predefined list of IPs on port 80. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • My visitors %20 percent can't reachable to my web site

    - by user39110
    Hi, i have dedicated web server and also i hosting www.btgmaslak.com web site. I'm facing a problem about 1 days. My visitors about 20 percent can't reach my web site. I thing this problem occurs because of dns settings. Can you analyze my dns settings and give me suggestions ? thanks http://www.intodns.com/btgmaslak.com

    Read the article

  • Restrictive routing best practices for Google App Engine with python?

    - by Aleksandr Makov
    Say I have a simple structure: app = webapp2.WSGIApplication([ (r'/', 'pages.login'), (r'/profile', 'pages.profile'), (r'/dashboard', 'pages.dash'), ], debug=True) Basically all pages require authentication except for the login. If visitor tries to reach a restrictive page and he isn't authorized (or lacks privileges) then he gets redirected to the login view. The question is about the routing design. Should I check the auth and ACL privs in each of the modules (pages.profile and pages.dash from example above), or just pass all requests through the single routing mechanism: app = webapp2.WSGIApplication([ (r'/', 'pages.login'), (r'/.+', 'router') ], debug=True) I'm still quite new to the GAE, but my app requires authentication as well as ACL. I'm aware that there's login directive on the server config level, but I don't know how it works and how I can tight it with my ACL logic and what's worse I cannot estimate time needed to get it running. Besides, it looks only to provide only 2 user groups: admin and user. In any case, that's the configuration I use: handlers: - url: /favicon.ico static_files: static/favicon.ico upload: static/favicon.ico - url: /static/* static_dir: static - url: .* script: main.app secure: always Or I miss something here and ACL can be set in the config file? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Redirect all access requests to a domain and subdomain(s) except from specific IP address? [closed]

    - by Christopher
    This is a self-answered question... After much wrangling I found the magic combination of mod_rewrite rules so I'm posting here. My scenario is that I have two domains - domain1.com and domain2.com - both of which are currently serving identical content (by way of a global 301 redirect from domain1 to domain2). Domain1 was then chosen to be repurposed to be a 'portal' domain - with a corporate CMS-based site leading off from the front page, and the existing 'retail' domain (domain2) left to serve the main web site. In addition, a staging subdomain was created on domain1 in order to prepare the new corporate site without impinging on the root domain's existing operation. I contemplated just rewriting all requests to domain2 and setting up the new corporate site 'behind the scenes' without using a staging domain, but I usually use subdomains when setting up new sites. Finally, I required access to the 'actual' contents of the domains and subdomains - i.e., to not be redirected like all other visitors - in order that I can develop the new site and test it in the staging environment on the live server, as I'm not using a separate development webserver in this case. I also have another test subdomain on domain1 which needed to be preserved. The way I eventually set it up was as follows: (10.2.2.1 would be my home WAN IP) .htaccess in root of domain1 RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !^10\.2\.2\.1 RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^staging.domain1.com$ [NC] RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^staging2.domain1.com$ [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://domain2.com/$1 [R=301] .htaccess in staging subdomain on domain1: RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REMOTE_ADDR} !^10\.2\.2\.1 RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^staging.revolver.coop$ [NC] RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://domain2.com/$1 [R=301,L] The multiple .htaccess files and multiple rulesets require more processing overhead and longer iteration as the visitor is potentially redirected twice, however I find it to be a more granular method of control as I can selectively allow more than one IP address access to individual staging subdomain(s) without automatically granting them access to everything else. It also keeps the rulesets fairly simple and easy to read. (or re-interpret, because I'm always forgetting how I put rules together!) If anybody can suggest a more efficient way of merging all these rules and conditions into just one main ruleset in the root of domain1, please post! I'm always keen to learn, this post is more my attempt to preserve this information for those who are looking to redirect entire domains for all visitors except themselves (for design/testing purposes) and not just denying specific file access for maintenance mode (there are many good examples of simple mod_rewrite rules for 'maintenance mode' style operation easily findable via Google). You can also extend the IP address detection - firstly by using wildcards ^10\.2\.2\..*: the last octet's \..* denotes the usual "." and then "zero or more arbitrary characters", signified by the .* - so you can specify specific ranges of IPs in a subnet or entire subnets if you wish. You can also use square brackets: ^10\.2\.[1-255]\.[120-140]; ^10\.2\.[1-9]?[0-9]\.; ^10\.2\.1[0-1][0-9]\. etc. The third way, if you wish to specify multiple discrete IP addresses, is to bracket them in the style of ^(1.1.1.1|2.2.2.2|3.3.3.3)$, and you can of course use square brackets to substitute octets or single digits again. NB: if you're using individual RewriteCond lines to specify multiple IPs / ranges, make sure to put [OR] at the end of each one otherwise mod_rewrite will interpret as "if IP address matches 1.1.1.1 AND if IP address matches 2.2.2.2... which is of course impossible! However as far as I'm aware this isn't necessary if you're using the ! negator to specify "and is not...". Kudos also to SE: this older question also came in useful when I was verifying my own knowledge prior to my futzing around with code. This page was helpful, as were the various other links posted below (can't hyperlink them all due to spam protection... other regex checkers are available). The AddedBytes cheat sheet's useful to pin up on your wall. Other referenced URLs: internetofficer.com/seo-tool/regex-tester/ fantomaster.com/faarticles/rewritingurls.txt internetofficer.com/seo-tool/regex-tester/ addedbytes.com/cheat-sheets/mod_rewrite-cheat-sheet/

    Read the article

  • ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches {:action=>"show", :controller=>"users", :id=>nil}):

    - by Matt Bishop
    I have been trying to fix this routing error for a long time. I would appreciate any assistance! This error is preventing me from being able to authenticate. Here is what I am getting in my Heroku logs. app/controllers/authentications_controller.rb:12:in `create' ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches {:action=>"show", :controller=>"users", :id=>nil}) Here is the routes.rb file: Company::Application.routes.draw do resources :profile_individual resources :careers match 'careers' => 'careers#index' match 'about' => 'about#index' constraints(:subdomain => /^$|www/) do devise_for :users resources :authentications, :identities #, :beta_invitations resources :users do resources :invitations, :controller => 'UserInvitation' do post :upload, :on => :collection get :email_template, :on => :collection get :plaintext_template, :on => :collection get :facebook_invitation, :on => :collection end member do get :summary get :recruits get :friends_events get :events_near_me get :recent_activity get :impact get :campaigns end end resources :password_resets do get 'password_reset' => 'password_resets#show', :as => 'password_reset' end resources :events, :only => [:new, :index, :create] resources :organizations, :only => [:index, :create] resources :orders do post :ipn, :on => :member resource :payment do member do post :relay_response get :receipt end end resource :paypal_integration do member do get :authorize get :cancel post :finalize end end end match '/users/:id/impact/money/:d' => 'users#impact_money_graph', :constraints => {:d => /\d+{4}_\d+{2}-\d+{2}/}, :as => :user_impact_money match '/users/:id/impact/money' => 'users#impact_money_graph', :as => :user_impact_money match '/users/:id/impact/recruits/:d' => 'users#impact_recruits_graph', :constraints => {:d => /\d+{4}_\d+{2}-\d+{2}/}, :as => :user_impact_recruits match '/users/:id/impact/recruits' => 'users#impact_recruits_graph', :as => :user_impact_recruits match '/auth/failure' => 'authentications#failure' match '/auth/:provider/callback' => 'authentications#create' match '/auth/:provider/callback' => 'authentications#show', :controller => 'users', :as => :login match '/logout' => 'authentications#destroy', :as => :logout match '/login' => 'authentications#new', :as => :login match "/join_team/:id" => "team_members#join", :as => :join_team match "/rsvp/:id" => "rsvps#show", :as => :rsvp match "/signup" => 'authentications#signup', :as => :signup match "/beacon/:id.gif" => "email_beacons#show", :as => :email_beacon root :to => "homes#show" match '/corporate_giving' => "homes#corporate_giving" end constraints(Subdomain) do resource :organization, :path => "/", :only => [:edit, :update] do member do get :org_photos_videos get :org_recent_activity end end resources :events, :except => [:index] do post :publish, :on => :member resource :supporter_invite resource :team_management do post :mailer, :on => :member end resource :team_member do post :invite, :on => :member end resource :rsvp do put :make_order, :on => :collection get :make_order, :on => :collection end resources :invites do post :upload, :on => :collection end resources :ticket_tiers, :team_members end match "/events" => redirect("/") root :to => "organizations#show" end namespace :admin do resources :stats resources :organizations resources :campaigns do resources :rewards resources :contents put :header, :action => 'header_update' end resources :users do member do post :grant_access post :revoke_access end end resources :nonprofits do member do put :approve put :revoke end end end resources :campaigns do get :find_charities, :on => :collection get :how_many_charities, :on => :collection member do post :join get :join post :header, :action => 'header_creation' put :header, :action => 'header_update' end resources :rewards resources :contents resource :donations do resource :paypal_integration, :controller => 'donations' do member do get :authorize get :cancel post :finalize end end end end match '/campaigns/:id/graph/:d' => 'campaigns#graph', :constraints => {:d => /\d+{4}_\d+ {2}-\d+{2}/}, :as => :graph_campaign match '/campaigns/:id/graph' => 'campaigns#graph', :as => :graph_campaign resources :business_campaigns, :controller => 'campaigns' resources :businesses do put :logo, :on => :collection, :action => 'upload_logo' member do get :summary get :recruits get :friends_events get :events_near_me get :recent_activity get :impact get :campaigns end end resources :nonprofit_campaigns, :controller => 'campaigns' resources :nonprofits do put :logo, :on => :collection, :action => 'upload_logo' member do get :summary get :recruits get :friends_events get :events_near_me get :recent_activity get :impact get :campaigns get :supporting_campaigns end end resources :publicities match '/campaigns/:campaign_id/rewards/:id' => 'campaigns#reward', :via => :get match "/robots.txt" => "application#robots_txt" match "/beta_invitations" => redirect('/') resource :sitemap resources :referrals end Here is my authentications_controller.rb file class AuthenticationsController < ApplicationController skip_before_filter :require_beta_access before_filter :redirect_to_profile_if_logged_in, :only => [:create, :new] layout :resolve_layout def create omniauth = request.env["omniauth.auth"] authentication = Authentication.find_by_provider_and_uid(omniauth['provider'], omniauth['uid']) if authentication && authentication.user.present? sign_in(:user, authentication.user) redirect_to session[:redirect_to] || user_path(current_user, :subdomain => nil) elsif current_user current_user.authentications.create!(:provider => omniauth['provider'], :uid => omniauth['uid']) redirect_to session[:redirect_to] || user_path(current_user, :subdomain => nil) else user = User.new user.apply_omniauth(omniauth) logger.debug "=======================auth=============================" logger.debug session[:referrer_token] logger.debug "========================================================" if session[:referrer_token] publicity = Publicity.find_by_token(session[:referrer_token]) user.invited_by = publicity user.recruited_by = publicity end if user.save sign_in(user) unless session[:redirect_to] session[:referrer_token] = nil end redirect_to session[:redirect_to] || user_path(current_user, :subdomain => nil) #redirect_to session[:redirect_to] || campaigns_url(:tc => request.env['omniauth.params']['tc']) #tc is for AB testing else session[:omniauth] = omniauth.except('extra') redirect_to signup_path end end end def failure flash[:error] = "Please check your email and password and try again" redirect_to login_path end def destroy reset_session redirect_to root_path end def signup # end private def redirect_to_profile_if_logged_in redirect_to user_path(current_user.permalink) if current_user end def resolve_layout case action_name when "new", "signup" "authentication" else "selfcontained" end end end I am adding my appplication_controller.rb too: class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base #Wrote by George for beta users -before_filter :require_beta_access before_filter :save_referrer_token protect_from_forgery helper_method :organization_admin?, :team_member?, :profile_url, :current_profile def set_headers # Set our headers here end def save_referrer_token #session.delete(:referrer_token) if params[:ref] publicity = Publicity.find_by_token(params[:ref]) logger.debug "========================================================" logger.debug current_profile.nil? logger.debug publicity.creator logger.debug current_profile logger.debug current_profile != publicity.creator session[:referrer_token] = params[:ref] if current_profile.nil? or publicity.creator != current_profile logger.debug session[:referrer_token] logger.debug "========================================================" end end def robots_txt robots = File.read(Rails.root + "public/robots.#{Rails.env}.txt") render :text => robots, :layout => false, :content_type => "text/plain" end def load_organization @organization = Organization.find_by_permalink(request.subdomain) raise ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound if @organization.nil? end def require_user unless current_user session[:redirect_to] = request.url redirect_to login_url(:host => request.domain) end end def require_beta_access if !current_user redirect_to root_url(:host => request.domain) elsif !current_user.beta_access? redirect_to new_beta_invitation_url(:host => request.domain) end end def require_organization_admin unless organization_admin? redirect_to root_url(:subdomain => @organization.permalink) end end def team_member? if current_user && @event.team_memberships.where(:user_id => current_user.id).count != 0 true end end def organization_admin? if current_user && current_user.beta_access? && @organization && @organization.memberships.where(:user_id => current_user.id, :role => 'admin').count != 0 true end end def profile_url(profile, opt = nil) if profile == current_user user_url(profile, :host => opt[:host]) elsif profile.is_a? BusinessProfile business_url(profile) elsif profile.is_a? NonprofitProfile nonprofit_url(profile) end end def set_current_profile(profile) session[:current_profile] = profile end def current_user @current_user ||= User.find_by_auth_token!(cookies[:auth_token]) if cookies[:auth_token] end def current_profile #if session session[:current_profile] || current_user #else # nil #end end IGIVEMORE_HTML5_OPTIOINS = { :style => 'z-index: 0;',:width => '290', :height => '200', :frameborder => '0', :url_params => {:wmode=>"opaque"} } def campaign_header_body(camp, opt = IGIVEMORE_HTML5_OPTIOINS) if camp.header_type == Campaign::HEADER_YOUTUBE youtube_html5(camp.header_url, opt).html_safe elsif camp.header_type == Campaign::HEADER_IMAGE "<img src=\"#{camp.header_url}\" width=\"#{opt[:width]}\" height=\"#{opt[:height]}\"/>'".html_safe else "Unsupported Type!!" end end def youtube_html5(url, opt) begin video = YouTubeIt::Client.new.video_by(url) video.embed_html5(opt).gsub(/http:\/\//,"https://") rescue => e "<div style='color:red; width:290px; height:100px; padding-top:100px'>Given Video URL has problem.</div>" end end end

    Read the article

  • What's the piece of hardware listening on Facebook's or Wikipedia's IP address?

    - by Igor Ostrovsky
    I am trying to understand how massive sites like Facebook or Wikipedia work, for my intellectual curiosity. I read about various techniques for building scalable sites, but I am still puzzled about one particular detail. The part that confuses me is that ultimately, the DNS will map the entire domain to a single IP address, or a handful of IP addresses in the case of round-robin DNS. For example, wikipedia.org has only one type-A DNS record. So, people from all over the world visiting Wikipedia have to send a request to the one IP address specified in DNS. What is the piece of hardware that listens on the IP address for a massive site, and how can it possibly handle all the load coming from the requests for users all over the world? Edit 1: Thanks for all the responses! Anycast seems like a feasible answer... Does anyone know of a way to check whether a particular IP address is anycast-routed, so that I could verify that this really is the trick used in practice by large sites? Edit 2: After more reading on the topic, it appears that anycast is not typically used for dynamic web content. Anycast is usually used for UDP (e.g., DNS lookups), or sometimes for static content. One interesting thing to note is that Facebook uses profile.ak.fbcdn.net to host static content like style sheets and javascript libraries. Each time I ping this name, I get a response from a different IP address. However, I can't tell whether this is anycast in action, or a completely different technique. Back to my original question: as far as I can tell, even a large site will have a single expensive piece of load-balancing hardware listening on its handful of public IP addresses.

    Read the article

  • How to send email from home ip when the email server isn't a designated outbound mail server allocated to BT Retail customers [on hold]

    - by Mr Shoubs
    (I am sys admin!) I can receive email, but when I try to send an email from my home office via our work email server I get the following reply: Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: Test Sent: 19/08/2014 17:02 The following recipient(s) cannot be reached: 'Joe Blogs' on 19/08/2014 17:02 Server error: '554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [my-ip-here] blocked using zen.spamhaus.org; http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=my-ip-here' I went to that URL and it says the following: Ref: PBL231588 81.152.0.0/13 is listed on the Policy Block List (PBL) Outbound Email Policy of BT Retail for this IP range: It is the policy of BT Retail that unauthenticated email sent from this IP address should be sent out only via the designated outbound mail server allocated to BT Retail customers. Please consult the following URL for details on how to configure your email client appropriately. http://btybb.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/btybb.cfg/php/enduser/cci/bty_adp.php?p_sid=fPnV4zhj&p_faqid=6876 Removal Procedure Removal of IP addresses within this range from the PBL is not allowed by the netblock owner's policy. Going to this URL just says: This site has been disabled for the time being. Does anyone know what I should do to allow me to send emails from my home ip - the site suggests I can configure my email client? (note that I have configured the client to use smtp authentication)

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118  | Next Page >