Search Results

Search found 17401 results on 697 pages for 'query optimizer'.

Page 117/697 | < Previous Page | 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124  | Next Page >

  • mysql PDO how to bind LIKE

    - by dmontain
    In this query select wrd from tablename WHERE wrd LIKE '$partial%' I'm trying to bind the variable '$partial%' with PDO. Not sure how this works with the % at the end. Would it be select wrd from tablename WHERE wrd LIKE ':partial%' where :partial is bound to $partial="somet" or would it be select wrd from tablename WHERE wrd LIKE ':partial' where :partial is bound to $partial="somet%" or would it be something entirely different?

    Read the article

  • Why better isolation level means better performance in MS SQL Server

    - by Oleg Zhylin
    When measuring performance on my query I came up with a dependency between isolation level and elapsed time that was surprising to me READUNCOMMITTED - 409024 READCOMMITTED - 368021 REPEATABLEREAD - 358019 SERIALIZABLE - 348019 Left column is table hint, and the right column is elapsed time in microseconds (sys.dm_exec_query_stats.total_elapsed_time). Why better isolation level gives better performance? This is a development machine and no concurrency whatsoever happens. I would expect READUNCOMMITTED to be the fasted due to less locking overhead.

    Read the article

  • Sql Shorthand For Dates

    - by vigilant
    Is there a way to write a query equivalent to select * from log_table where dt >= 'nov-27-2009' and dt < 'nov-28-2009'; but where you could specify only 1 date and say you want the results for that entire day until the next one. I'm just making this up, but something of the form: select * from log_table where dt = 'nov-27-2009':+1;

    Read the article

  • Deferring frequent updates in MySQL

    - by cdecker
    I have frequent updates to a user table that simply sets the last seen time of a user, and I was wondering whether there is a simple way to defer them and group them into a single query after a short timeout (5 minutes or so). This would reduce queries on my user database quite a lot.

    Read the article

  • Select random row from MySQL (with probability)

    - by James Simpson
    I have a MySQL table that has a row called cur_odds which is a percent number with the percent probability that that row will get selected. How do I make a query that will actually select the rows in approximately that frequency when you run through 100 queries for example? I tried the following, but a row that has a probability of 0.35 ends up getting selected around 60-70% of the time. SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY RAND()*cur_odds DESC

    Read the article

  • Doctrine DQL execute passing params

    - by Karim web Developer
    I used this DQL in Doctrine $q->update('product') ->set('quantity','?') ->where('id=?'); $q->execute(array(20,5)); I check the server for the query and this the generated sql UPDATE product SET quantity = '20', updated_at = '5' WHERE (id = '2010-04-26 14:34); So I need to know why the arguments aren't in the correct places?

    Read the article

  • mySQL - How to select a date interval

    - by fabriciols
    Hello, this is my table : ------------------------------------- | user | item | date_time | | 10 | 01 | 10-10-10 20:10:05 | | 10 | 02 | 10-10-10 20:10:10 | | 10 | 03 | 10-10-10 20:10:10 | | 20 | 02 | 10-10-10 20:15:10 | | 20 | 02 | 10-10-10 20:20:10 | | 30 | 10 | 10-10-10 20:01:10 | | 30 | 20 | 10-10-10 20:01:20 | | 30 | 30 | 10-10-10 20:05:20 | ------------------------------------- i want to do a query that return a user that took multiple items in a 1min interval, like this result : ------------------------------------- | user | item | date_time | | 10 | 01 | 10-10-10 20:10:05 | | 10 | 02 | 10-10-10 20:10:10 | | 10 | 03 | 10-10-10 20:10:10 | | 30 | 10 | 10-10-10 20:01:10 | | 30 | 20 | 10-10-10 20:01:20 | ------------------------------------- how i do this ?

    Read the article

  • Search Multiple Tables of a Mysql Database

    - by DogPooOnYourShoe
    I have the following code: $query = "select * from customer where Surname like \"%$trimmed%\" OR TitleName like \"%$trimmed%\" OR PostCode like \"%$trimmed%\" order by Surname"; However, I have another table which I want to search from with the same paramaters(variables) as that. I know that something like "select * from customer,othertable" might not be possible, Is there a way to do it?

    Read the article

  • Is there an equivalent of "OPTION(RECOMPILE)" or "WITH RECOMPILE" for an entire connection?

    - by kamens
    I'm curious. Is there any way to prevent SQL query execution plans from being cached for an entire connection's duration? Can I run a command that basically says, "use OPTION(RECOMPILE) for all subsequent commands until I tell you to stop doing so?" I'm acutely aware of all the performance trade-offs here, and I know this is not a step to be taken lightly. However, I'm in a unique situation where this behavior may be advantageous.

    Read the article

  • IDs necessary in update script not being stored (or even seen!?) (PHP MySQL)

    - by Derek
    Hi guys, I really need help with this one...have spent 3 hours trying to figure it out... Basically, I have 3 tables necessary for this function to work (the query and PHP)... Authors, Books and Users. An author can have many books, and a user can have many books - that's it. When the admin user selects to update a book, they are presented with a form, displaying the current data within the fields, very straight forward... However there is one tricky part, the admin user can change the author for a book (incase they make a mistake) and also change the user for which the book is associated with. When I select to update the single book information I am not getting any values what so ever for author_id or user_id. Meaning that when the user updates the book info, the associations with the user and author is being scrapped altogether (when before there was an association)... I cannot see why this is happening because I can clearly see the IDs for the users and authors for my option values (this is because they are in select dropdowns). Here is what my sql to retrieve the user ID is: SELECT user_id, name FROM users and then i have my select options which brings up all the users in the system: <label>This book belongs to:</label> <select name="name" id="name"> <option value="<?php echo $row['user_id']?>" SELECTED><?php echo $row['name']?> - Current</option> <?php while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { ?> <option value="<?php echo $row['user_id']; if (isset($_POST['user_id']));?>"><?php echo $row['name']?></option> <?php } ?> In the presented HTML form, I can select the users (by name) and within the source code I can see the IDs (for the value) matching against the names of the users. Finally, in my script that performs the update, I have this: $book_id = $_POST['book_id']; $bookname = $_POST['bookname']; $booklevel = $_POST['booklevel']; $author_id = $_POST['author_id']; $user_id = $_POST['user_id']; $sql = "UPDATE books SET bookname= '".$bookname."', booklevel= '".$booklevel."', author_id='".$author_id."', user_id= '".$user_id."' WHERE book_id = ".$book_id; The result of this query returns no value for either author_id or user_id... Obviously in this question I have given the information for the user stuff (with the HTML being displayed) but im guessing that I have the same problem with authors aswell... How can I get these ID's passed to the script so that the change can be acknowledge!! :(

    Read the article

  • C# Outer Apply in LINQ

    - by JeremySpouken
    How can I achieve Outer Apply in LINQ? I'm having a bit of a problem. Here's the SQL Query I'm using. SELECT u.masterID ,u.user ,h.created FROM dbo.Users u OUTER APPLY (SELECT TOP 1 * FROM UserHistory h where h.masterID = u.masterID ORDER BY created DESC) h

    Read the article

  • How to formulate a SQL Server indexed view that aggregates distinct values?

    - by Jeremy Lew
    I have a schema that includes tables like the following (pseudo schema): TABLE ItemCollection { ItemCollectionId ...etc... } TABLE Item { ItemId, ItemCollectionId, ContributorId } I need to aggregate the number of distinct contributors per ItemCollectionId. This is possible with a query like: SELECT ItemCollectionId, COUNT(DISTINCT ContributorId) FROM Item GROUP BY ItemCollectionId I further want to pre-calculate this aggregation using an indexed (materialized) view. The DISTINCT prevents an index being placed on this view. Is there any way to reformulate this which will not violate SQL Server's indexed view constraints?

    Read the article

  • how to get latest entry from a table for an item and do arithmatic operation on it?

    - by I Like PHP
    i have below tables tbl_rcv_items st_id | item_id |stock_opening_qnty |stock_received_qnty |stock_rcvd_date 14 1 0 70 2010-05-18 15 16 0 100 2010-05-06 16 10 0 59 2010-05-20 17 14 0 34 2010-05-20 20 1 70 5 2010-05-12 tbl_issu_items issue_id refer_issue_id item_id item_qntt item_updated 51 1 1 5 2010-05-18 19:34:29 52 1 16 6 2010-05-18 19:34:29 53 1 10 7 2010-05-18 19:34:29 54 1 14 8 2010-05-18 19:34:29 75 7 1 12 2010-05-18 19:40:52 76 7 16 1 2010-05-18 19:40:52 77 7 10 1 2010-05-18 19:40:52 78 7 14 1 2010-05-18 19:40:52 79 8 1 3 2010-05-19 11:28:50 80 8 16 5 2010-05-19 11:28:50 81 8 10 6 2010-05-19 11:28:50 82 8 14 7 2010-05-19 11:28:51 87 10 1 2 2010-05-19 12:51:03 88 10 16 0 2010-05-19 12:51:03 89 10 10 0 2010-05-19 12:51:03 90 10 14 0 2010-05-19 12:51:03 91 14 1 1 2010-05-19 18:43:58 92 14 14 3 2010-05-19 18:43:58 tbl_item_detail item_id item_name 1 shirt 2 belt 10 ball pen 14 vim powder 16 pant NOW if i want total available quantity for each item till today using both table total available quantity for an item =stock_opening_qnty+stock_received_qnty(LATEST ENTRY FROM (tbl_rcv_item) for that item id according to stock_rcvd_date) - SUM(item_qntt) for eg: if i want to know the available quantity for item_id=1 till today(25-05-2010) then it shoud be 70+5(latest entry for item_id till 25/5/2010)-23( issued till 25/5/2010)=52 i write below query , SELECT tri.item_id, tid.item_name, (tri.stock_opening_qnty + tri.stock_received_qnty) AS totalRcvQntt, SUM( tii.item_qntt ) AS totalIsudQntt FROM tbl_rcv_items tri JOIN tbl_issu_items tii ON tii.item_id = tri.item_id JOIN tbl_item_detail tid ON tid.item_id=tri.item_id WHERE tri.stock_rcvd_date <= CURDATE() GROUP BY (tri.item_id) which results Array ( [0] => Array ( [item_id] => 1 [item_name] => shirt [totalRcvQntt] => 70 [totalIsudQntt] => 46 ) [1] => Array ( [item_id] => 10 [item_name] => ball pen [totalRcvQntt] => 59 [totalIsudQntt] => 16 ) [2] => Array ( [item_id] => 14 [item_name] => vim powder [totalRcvQntt] => 34 [totalIsudQntt] => 20 ) [3] => Array ( [item_id] => 16 [item_name] => pant [totalRcvQntt] => 100 [totalIsudQntt] => 17 ) ) in above result total isuse quantity for shirt(item_id=1) shoube be 23 whereas results reflects 46 bcoz there are two row regrading item_id=1 in tbl_rcv_items, i only need the latest one(means which stock_rcvd_date is less than tommorow) please tell me where i doing mistake?? or rewrite the best query. thanks a lot!

    Read the article

  • ignoring saturday and sunday

    - by bsandrabr
    I am pulling in all the records from my customer database(mysql) for the last ten days $offset1 =strtotime("-10 day"); $date3=date("Y-m-d",$offset1); SELECT * FROM customers WHERE date between '$date3' and '$date' AND customer.custid = '$custid' ORDER by date DESC I would like to leave out the dates falling on a saturday or sunday and would like to put this in my query rather than the php If you can help thanks

    Read the article

  • Ordering Wordpress posts by most recent comment

    - by James
    I'm wanting to order Wordpress posts by the most recent comment. To the best of my knowledge this isn't possible using the WP_Query object, and would require a custom $wpdb query, which I can easily write. However, I then don't know how to setup the loop to run off this object. Can anyone help?

    Read the article

  • sql: trying to select the second biggest element but selects the biggest

    - by matthy
    we want to have the second biggest element. We first use ANY to exclude the biggest one. Then we use all to select the biggest. However when we run this query, it shows the biggest and not the second one. Why? SELECT * FROM bestelling WHERE totaalprijs > ALL ( SELECT totaalprijs FROM bestelling WHERE totaalprijs < ANY ( SELECT totaalprijs FROM bestelling ) ) elements in the table: 157.00 5.00 82.80 15.00 20.00 20.00

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124  | Next Page >