Search Results

Search found 364 results on 15 pages for 'ricky williams'.

Page 12/15 | < Previous Page | 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >

  • Accessing 'data' argument of with() function?

    - by Ken Williams
    Is it possible, in the expr expression of the with() function, to access the data argument directly? Here's what I mean conceptually: > print(df) result qid f1 f2 f3 -1 1 0.0000 0.1253 0.0000 -1 1 0.0098 0.0000 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.1941 -1 2 0.0000 0.2863 0.0948 1 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 2 0.0000 0.7282 0.9087 > with(df, subset(.data, select=f1:f3)) # Doesn't work Of course the above example is kind of silly, but it would be handy for things like this: with(subset(df, f2>0), foo(qid, vars=subset(.data, select=f1:f3))) I tried to poke around with environment() and parent.frame() etc., but didn't come up with anything that worked. Maybe this is really a question about eval(), since that's how with.default() is implemented.

    Read the article

  • get next available integer using LINQ

    - by Daniel Williams
    Say I have a list of integers: List<int> myInts = new List<int>() {1,2,3,5,8,13,21}; I would like to get the next available integer, ordered by increasing integer. Not the last or highest one, but in this case the next integer that is not in this list. In this case the number is 4. Is there a LINQ statement that would give me this? As in: var nextAvailable = myInts.SomeCoolLinqMethod(); Edit: Crap. I said the answer should be 2 but I meant 4. I apologize for that! For example: Imagine that you are responsible for handing out process IDs. You want to get the list of current process IDs, and issue a next one, but the next one should not just be the highest value plus one. Rather, it should be the next one available from an ordered list of process IDs. You could get the next available starting with the highest, it does not really matter.

    Read the article

  • How to remember the prior page before accessing subsequent pages across frame

    - by Ricky
    Hi guys: I get two frames, says A and B. Clicking a link in A will trigger page in B changing from URL_A to URL_B. How do I remember URL_A, so that when users click cacnel button in URL_B, they can go back to URL_A? how do I get mainFrame's URL in fraTopMenu? <frameset rows="60,*" cols="*" frameborder="no" border="0" framespacing="0"> <frame src="/Common/Manager/TopMenu.aspx" name="fraTopMenu" scrolling="no" noresize="noresize" id="fraTopMenu" title="" /> <frameset rows="*" cols="185,*" framespacing="0" frameborder="no" border="0"> <frame src="/Common/Manager/LeftMenu.aspx" name="leftFrame" id="leftFrame" title="" /> <frame src="<%= MainUrl %>" name="mainFrame" id="mainFrame" /> </frameset> </frameset>

    Read the article

  • How to override jquery's show() and hide() functions

    - by Max Williams
    hi all Short version of question: see title Long version of question: I've used jquery's show() and hide() functions extensively in my code and just encountered a bit of a problem: they work by changing the display attribute of the element to 'block' or 'none' respectively, so that if you have somethin that has display: inline and then hide and show it, you've changed its display to block, which screws up the layout in a couple of cases. In my code, whenever i want something to be hidden initially i give it a class 'hidden'. This class is simply {display: none}. I'd like the change show and hide to remove or add this class, instead of directly changing the display attribute, so that if you add the hidden class and then remove it again (ie hide and show something) then it's back to exactly how it was to start off with (since adding a class overrides the attributes rather than directly changing them). Something like this (this is a little pseucodey as i don't know how to set the function up properly - let's assume that 'this' is the object that show/hide was called on) function show(){ this.removeClass("hidden"); } function hide(){ this.addClass("hidden"); } how and where would i go about overriding the jquery methods? (I'm not a javascript expert) thanks - max

    Read the article

  • [JS] How to workaround same origin problem

    - by Ricky
    Hi guys: The following JS will fail if the URL in mainFrame from a.abc.com to b.abc.com. top.frames["mainFrame"].location.href = "/Users/xuenn.aspx?backUrl=" + top.frames["mainFrame"].location.href.split("?")[0]; This is the error message: Permission denied for http://a.abc.com to get property Location.href from http://b.abc.com. Anybody knows how could I workaround this or think of other solutions?

    Read the article

  • Git is deleting an ignored file when i switch branches

    - by Max Williams
    I have one branch (let's call it B) that ignores a certain file, which isn't ignored in some other branches (eg branch A). When i switch from branch B to branch A, then back to B again, the file has been deleted. Is this normal? I can sort of see how it would happen, in the sense that branch B thinks it's not there, and branch A thinks that it is, so when i go back to B it 'tidies it away'. But it's kind of annoying. Any suggestions? thanks, max

    Read the article

  • How to animate/show a hidden div?

    - by Ricky Cortes
    So I'm trying to show a div with a toggle transition when a link is clicked. My code: $("nav ul li#about a").click(function (e) { $("div#about").slideToggle(200); e.preventDefault(); }); It works great, but I want this effect here: http://ricostacruz.com/jquery.transit/ Scroll down and find "TRANSITIONS FOR OTHER PROPERTIES". Do you see that scale effect (first demo box)? THAT is what I want instead of the slideToggle. So I want this similar effect to TOGGLE... transition IN and OUT when link is clicked. I hope you guys can help me :)

    Read the article

  • how to use is()

    - by Ricky
    Hi guys, How to refactor the follow to put NOT is(":checked") syntax, instead put the codes being executed in the else block? if ($(this).is(":checked")) { // do nothing } else { // To do here } Thanks for all the help.

    Read the article

  • Disable a form and all contained elements until an ajax query completes (or another solution to prev

    - by Max Williams
    I have a search form with inputs and selects, and when any input/select is changed i run some js and then make an ajax query with jquery. I want to stop the user from making further changes to the form while the request is in progress, as at the moment they can initiate several remote searches at once, effectively causing a race between the different searches. It seems like the best solution to this is to prevent the user from interacting with the form while waiting for the request to come back. At the moment i'm doing this in the dumbest way possible by hiding the form before making the ajax query and then showing it again on success/error. This solves the problem but looks horrible and isn't really acceptable. Is there another, better way to prevent interaction with the form? To make things more complicated, to allow nice-looking selects, the user actually interacts with spans which have js hooked up to them to tie them to the actual, hidden, selects. So, even though the spans aren't inputs, they are contained in the form and represent the actual interactive elements of the form. Grateful for any advice - max. Here's what i'm doing now: function submitQuestionSearchForm(){ //bunch of irrelevant stuff var questionSearchForm = jQuery("#searchForm"); questionSearchForm.addClass("searching"); jQuery.ajax({ async: true, data: jQuery.param(questionSearchForm.serializeArray()), dataType: 'script', type: 'get', url: "/questions", success: function(msg){ //more irrelevant stuff questionSearchForm.removeClass("searching"); }, error: function(msg){ questionSearchForm.removeClass("searching"); } }); return true; }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  | Next Page >