url validation - Page 12

Does the keyword blog in url impove seo?

- by slow diver

I have seen a couple of site which has high number of hits. They are mostly tutorial sites and blogs that address software issue/errors. I wonder if the kewybord "blog" has a very positive effect in SEO? In my own site, I have install word press in root folder to avoid any blog keyword. I also did this to keep urls shallow (deeper url are not good for SEO). But I may want to think on it again. The sites I am referring too are http://blog.sqlauthority.com http://veerasundar.com/blog/2011/11/making-xampp-to-serve-any-directory-outside-htdocs/ I know there are standard (sort of) class names or ID that identify different contents and makes it easier for the search engine to identify contents like, "container", "menu". The use of word "blog" would mean this is about dicussing/tutoring something and have a very positive effect on SEO?

Read the article

URL rewrite from www.domain.com/sudirectory to http://domain.com/subdirectory

- by chrizzbee

I need a solution for the following problem: I use a CMS and want the backend only be available at http://domain.com/backend and not at http://www.domain.com/backend. How do I have to change my .htaccess file to achieve this? I already have a rewrite rule from HTTP (non-www) to www. Here's what I currently have in my .htaccess file: ## # Uncomment the following lines to add "www." to the domain: # RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^shaba-baden\.ch$ [NC] RewriteRule (.*) http://www.shaba-baden.ch/$1 [R=301,L] # # Uncomment the following lines to remove "www." from the domain: # # RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.example\.com$ [NC] # RewriteRule (.*) http://example.com/$1 [R=301,L] # # Make sure to replace "example.com" with your domain name. ## So, the first bit is the redirect from HTTP to www. It works on the domain part of the URL. As explained, I need a rewrite rule from the backend login at http://www.shaba-baden.ch/contao to http://shaba-baden.ch/contao

Read the article

Recovery from URL structure change?

- by Dejan Pelzel

in July this year, we have changed the URL structure of the website from: Post: domain.com/blog/post/986/dance/heart-beats-dance-video-by-chinatsu/ Category: domain.com/blog/index/cosplay/ to Post: domain.com/dance/heart-beats-dance-video-by-chinatsu-986/ Category: domain.com/cosplay/ Everything was (supposedly) properly redirected with 301 redirects and it first seemed that the traffic returned after a couple of days, but it has now been close to 2 months and things keep going worse although Google is slowly indexing the changes. What is worrying me even more is that the Pages crawled per day from Webmaster Tools started drastically dropping a few days ago and has just reached a new low in months (from over 2000 to 700). Should I be worried or will things sort out eventually?

Read the article

URL structure for content that is updated daily

- by Brendon

A small, simple site I am working on displays a single page with the day's best offers on it. The user is able to move back and forth between previous days. Which of the following URL structures works best? Structure 1 /index.html -- today's best offers /2013-06-29.html -- yesterday's best offers, etc. Structure 2 /index.html -- 302 redirects to /2013-06-30.html (or whatever today is) /2013-06-30.html -- today's best offers /2013-06-29.html -- yesterday's best offers, etc. I quite like structure 2 from the user's point of view (they can share content easily), but I am a bit concerned about updating the redirect from /index.html every single day -- would this perhaps have unintended SEO consequences?

Read the article

Getting a domain sub-directory url for a new server

- by Xianlin

I have an web application server running tomcat and i need to publish my APIs to internet users. However I don't have a domain name for this server and I can only put the ip address of this server (e.g. 145.XXX.XXX.XXX) to point out where my API xml files are located. I have another web server running with a domain name "http://www.webserver.com" registered on the internet and I want to make use of its domain name to server my web application server API xml files location. How can I do that? using "www.webserver.com/api" or using "api.webserver.com"? which is better? Also I wonder if I want to publish a "rstp://145.XXX.XXX.XXX" web link for video streaming purpose, can I use "rstp://www.webserver.com/api" to replace it and how to do it? I always thought the url contain domain sub-directory name cannot point to another IP address, it only can point to another folder location on the webserver itself.

Read the article

Moving large website to new CMS - URL changes

- by herrherr

Hi, I was wondering if you have any tipps on the following situation. I'm going to move a large website to a new Content Management System, here are some details on the site: online news magazine with roughly 3,000 articles domain age: 10 years online in the current form since May 2010 indexed pages: ~10.000 percent of search engine traffic: under 10% Unfortunately a custom-tailored CMS was used for the site. The performance, reliability and SEO capabilites have been really bad, so we are moving to a new and proven open source CMS. All the articles will be kept as they are, but the URL structure as well as the structure of the HTML templates will be changed. What I wanted to do now is to actually create 301 redirects for all articles from the old to the new schema, i.e: Old: www.example.com/en/html/news/detail/title-of-the-article/ New: www.example.com/category/title-of-article.html Is this a proven way to do something like this? If not, can you recommend a way that has worked for you? Thanks :)

Read the article

Accented characters representation in the URL

- by Dan

We have support for various languages in our website, including Spanish, French and Swedish. For now, the links in the site are NOT encoded before sent to the browser, sending the real accented chars (if such exists, i.e. href="www.(dot)example(dot)com/héllo.html") and not their HEX representation. This works & looks good on all browsers, including Chrome, FF and IE. However, we care great deal about SEO. We got this tip that encoding the links before sending them to the browser (so instead of linking to http://www.example.com/héllo, we will link to http://www.example.com/h%E9llo) will improve the way search engines will 'understand' the links and the keywords in the URL. This involves some work at our side, so we wanted to know if there's truth in that tip, but couldn't find anything addressing this issue.

Read the article

Working with different URL structures

- by Dane411

As I'm quite newbie to this field, I've doubts and there are some I couldn't find on Google, i.e: If I'm not wrong, index.html makes it possible to avoid to add the filename to the url, www.example.com/ is equal to www.example.com/index.html. And that works for the following subdirectories, right? www.example.com/music/ Is there any other way to achieve this without using an index.html file? (I've read smth about converting dynamic urls to static: ./?var1=value1&varN=valueN - ./value1/valueN) How can I convert www.example.com/music/ to music.example.com/ and why should it be used? Thanks in advance!

Read the article

URL rewriting via forward proxy

- by Biggroover

I have an app that runs inside my firewall and talks out to multiple end points via HTTP/HTTPS on a non-standard port e.g. http://endpoint1.domain.com:7171, http://endpoint2.domain.com:7171 What I want to do is route these requests through a forward proxy that then rewrites the URL to something like http://allendpoints.domain.com/endpoint1 (port 80 or 443) then on the other end have a reverse proxy that unwinds what I did on the forward proxy to reach the specific endpoints. The result being that I can route existing app requests through to specific endpoints across the internet without having to change my app software. My questions are: is this even possible? is it a good idea, are their better ways to do this? Can this be done with IIS and Apache as the proxies?

Read the article

URL parameter names being changed by user agents

- by Mike Deck

In reviewing one of our site's web logs I'm seeing instances where we are returning a 404 to requests because we're expecting an id parameter to be sent, but instead we're seeing a di parameter. The resource in question is an image but which image file actually gets served is dependent on the id parameter. The expected url is something like http://images.mysite.com/photo.gif?id=123&width=200&height=300 What I'm seeing in the logs is requests for http://images.mysite.com/photo.gif?di=123&width=200&height=300 The only case where we are seeing this on the id parameter. It seems unlikely that this is due to a server side or JavaScript bug since it seems to be only effecting a small percentage of our traffic. We are seeing this across a wide variety of user agents (both mobile and desktop) and IPs. Has anyone else seen this? Is there a browser plugin or other software you're aware of that could be causing this, and if so is there a good way to work around the issue?

Read the article

URL Frame redirection CakePHP

- by themanbehindoftheprojectmayhem

I need to redirect CakePHP installation host to my domain. Location of my Cakephp installation: myhosting.com/newsite/ Domain: www.mydomain.com I'm currently using URL Frame to direct www.mydomain.com to myhosting.com/newsite/. Problem When I load www.mydomain.com, I see all links in the site is pointing to the hosting location - example - myhosting.com/newsite/product/1 It should be pointing to www.mydomain.com/product/1 Any simple way to fix this? Probably very simple to solve it, but I can't bend it. Help much appreciated.

Read the article

Ant get task throws "get doesn't support nested resources element" error

- by David Corley

The following ant xml should work according to documentation, but does not. Can anyone tell me if I'm doing something wrong. The get task should support the nested "resources" element in Ant 1.7.1 which is the version I'm using: -- <target name="setup"> <tstamp/>     <property name="framework_wa" value="../../../framework"/> <property name="xpbuw_wa" value="../../../xpbuw"/> <property name="xpb_wa" value="../../../xpb"/> <property name="bil_wa" value="../.."/>  <property name="out" value="${user.dir}"/>  <property name="locale" value="us"/>  <property name="contextRoot" value="xpertBridge"/> <property name="build_dir" value="${out}/${release}/build"/> <property name="distrib_dir" value="${out}/${release}/distrib"/> <property name="build.number" value="-1"/>  <get dest="${lib}"> <resources> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=central&g=soap&a=soap&v=2.3.1&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=JBOSS&g=apache-fileupload&a=commons-fileupload&v=1.0&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=regexp&a=regexp&v=1.1&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=javax.mail&a=mail&v=1.2&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=com.ibm.ws.webservices&a=webservices.thinclient&v=6.1.0&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=avalon-framework&a=avalon-framework&v=4.2.0&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=jimi&a=jimi&v=1.0&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=batik&a=batik-all&v=1.6&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=bsf&a=bsf&v=2.3.0&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=rhino&a=js&v=1.5R3&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=central&g=commons-io&a=commons-io&v=1.1&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=central&g=commons-logging&a=commons-logging&v=1.0.4&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=xmlgraphics&a=commons&v=1.0&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=barcode4j&a=barcode4j&v=trunkBIL&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=com.ibm&a=fmcojagt&v=6.1&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=com.allfinanz&a=ejbserversupport&v=1.0&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=com.sun&a=jce&v=1.0&e=zip"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=ssce&a=ssce&v=5.8&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=com.ibm&a=mq&v=5.1&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=com.ibm&a=mqjms&v=5.1&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=NetServerRemote&a=NetServerRemote&v=1.0&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=NetServerRMI&a=NetServerRMI&v=1.0&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=jwsdp&a=saaj-api&v=1.5&e=jar&c=api"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=jwsdp&a=saaj-impl&v=1.5&e=jar&c=impl"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=org.apache.xmlgraphics&a=fop&v=0.92b&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=xerces&a=dom3-xml-apis&v=1.0&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=org.apache&a=derbynet&v=10.0.2&e=jar"/> <url url="http://repo.fms.allfinanz.com/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=thirdparty&g=com.sun&a=jsse&v=1.0&e=jar"/> </resources> </get> </target>

Read the article

site not working with url www

- by jarus

hello im having problem with my site when i type http://mysite.com it works fine but when i type http://www.mysite.com it displays page cannot be found , what is the problem i couldnot find , i tried .htaccess redirection also RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.mysite.com [nc] RewriteRule (.*) mysite.com/$1 [R=301,L] it is not working any help will be appreciated

Read the article

URL Rewrite problem. (Many directory)

- by marharépa

Hello! I'd like to make a htaccess file, which can make a good structure for my websites. My .htaccess is now: RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !\.(jpg|jpeg|gif|png|css|js|pl|txt)$ RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/admin/* RewriteRule ^(.*)$ index.php?q=$1 [QSA] (based on Sombat's comment) And I want to make this, with it: for every elements but (jpg|jpeg|gif|png|css|js|pl|txt) if domain.xx/admin redirect to the domain.xx/admin directory and don't make a rewrite at all i mean: let me use domain.xx/admin/index.php?asd=1&asdd=2 else rewrite everything as rule one, to index.php. Thanks for the help.

Read the article

Is Form validation and Business validation too much?

- by Robert Cabri

I've got this question about form validation and business validation. I see a lot of frameworks that use some sort of form validation library. You submit some values and the library validates the values from the form. If not ok it will show some errors on you screen. If all goes to plan the values will be set into domain objects. Here the values will be or, better said, should validated (again). Most likely the same validation in the validation library. I know 2 PHP frameworks having this kind of construction Zend/Kohana. When I look at programming and some principles like Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) and single responsibility principle (SRP) this isn't a good way. As you can see it validates twice. Why not create domain objects that do the actual validation. Example: Form with username and email form is submitted. Values of the username field and the email field will be populated in 2 different Domain objects: Username and Email class Username {} class Email {} These objects validate their data and if not valid throw an exception. Do you agree? What do you think about this aproach? Is there a better way to implement validations? I'm confused about a lot of frameworks/developers handling this stuff. Are they all wrong or am I missing a point? Edit: I know there should also be client side kind of validation. This is a different ballgame in my Opinion. If You have some comments on this and a way to deal with this kind of stuff, please provide.

Read the article

Is it safe to validate a URL with a regexp?

- by Vilx-

In my web app I've got a form field where the user can enter an URL. I'm already doing some preliminary client-side validation and I was wondering if I could use a regexp to validate if the entered string is a valid URL. So, two questions: Is it safe to do this with a regexp? A URL is a complex beast, and just like you shouldn't use a regexp for parsing HTML, I'm worried that it might be unsuitable for a URL as well. If it can be done, what would be a good regexp for the task? (I know that Google turns up countless regexps, but I'm worried about their quality). My goal is to prevent a situation where the URL appears in the web page and is unusable by the browser.

Read the article

URL is generating a /#!/splash-page

- by user32642

My site for some reason is generating a shebang - /#!/splash-page on the URL. For example when I type www.modernvintage1005.com, the browser returns www.modernvintage1005.com/#!/splash-page and every subsequent page is /#!/about, /#!/contact, and so forth. There's absolutely nothing on the Google about this. There is a lot of rewrite help to eliminate .index.php from the home page, but that's it. How do I rewrite it to just say domain.com and domain.com/about.html, etc.? Here is my .htaccess file if you need to see it. # Rewrite Rule <IfModule mod_rewrite.c> RewriteEngine On RewriteBase / RewriteRule ^index\.php$ - [L] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule . /index.php [L] </IfModule> # compress text, html, javascript, css, xml: <IfModule mod_deflate.c> AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/plain AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/xml AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/css AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/xml AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/xhtml+xml AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/rss+xml AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/javascript AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/x-javascript AddType x-font/otf .otf AddType x-font/ttf .ttf AddType x-font/eot .eot AddType x-font/woff .woff AddType image/x-icon .ico AddType image/png .png </IfModule> ## EXPIRES CACHING ## <IfModule mod_expires.c> ExpiresActive On ExpiresByType image/jpg "access 1 year" ExpiresByType image/jpeg "access 1 year" ExpiresByType image/gif "access 1 year" ExpiresByType image/png "access 1 year" ExpiresByType text/css "access 1 month" ExpiresByType application/pdf "access 1 month" ExpiresByType text/x-javascript "access 1 month" ExpiresByType application/x-shockwave-flash "access 1 month" ExpiresByType image/x-icon "access 1 year" ExpiresDefault "access 2 days" </IfModule> ## EXPIRES CACHING ##

Read the article

Should I use subdomains or subfolders for my user groups?

- by bilygates

Hello, I run a photography website where each user has its own subdomain (i.e. user.site.com). I'm thinking of adding user groups but I'm unable to decide if I should also associate a separate subdomain or simply a subfolder for each group: Subfolders (www.site.com/groups/my-group) Pros: Easier to maintain from a tehnical p.o.v. Cons: Harder to memorize. The URLs can get really long (www.site.com/groups/my-group/albums/my-album/) Subdomains (my-group.site.com) Pros: Easier to memorize. Shorter URLs. One might have the impression that such an URL is somewhat more "independent" from the main site. Cons: Group and user names belong to the same name space, so we need to check for collisions when creating a new user/group. One cannot determine the content of the page by only reading the URL: Is x.site.com a user page or a group page? What's your opinion on the matter? I should note that DeviantArt.com uses the 2nd option (that's where I got the idea). Thank you in advance!

Read the article

DRY Validation with MVC2

- by Matthew

Hi All, I'm trying to figure out how I can define validation rules for my domain objects in one single location within my application but have run in to a snag... Some background: My location has several parts: - Database - DAL - Business Logic Layer - SOAP API Layer - MVC website The MVC website accesses the database via the SOAP API, just as third parties would. We are using server and and client side validation on the MVC website as well as in the SOAP API Layer. To avoid having to manually write client side validation we are implementing strongly typed views in conjunction with the Html.TextBoxFor and Html.ValidationMessageFor HTML helpers, as shown in Step 3 here. We also create custom models for each form where one form takes input for multiple domain objects. This is where the problem begins, the HTML helpers read from the model for the data annotation validation attributes. In most cases our forms deal with multiple domain objects and you can't specify more than one type in the <%@Page ... Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage" % page directive. So we are forced to create a custom model class, which would mean duplicating validation attributes from the domain objects on to the model class. I've spent quite some time looking for workarounds to this, such has referencing the same MetadataType from both the domain class and the custom MVC models, but that won't work for several reasons: You can only specify one MetadataType attribute per class, so its a problem if a model references multiple domain objects, each with their own metadata type. The data annotation validation code throws an exception if the model class doesn't contain a property that is specified in the referenced MetadataType which is a problem with the model only deals with a subset of the properties for a given domain object. I've looked at other solutions as well but to no avail. If anyone has any ideas on how to achieve a single source for validation logic that would work across MVC client and server side validation functionality and other locations (such as my SOAP API) I would love to hear it! Thanks in advance, Matthew

Read the article

Create combined client side and server side validation in Symfony2

- by ausi

I think it would be very useful to create client side form validation up on the symfony2 Form and Validator components. The best way to do this would be to pass the validation constraints to the form view. With that information it would be possible to make a template that renders a form field to something like this: <div> <label for="form_email">E-Mail</label> <input id="form_email" type="text" name="form[email]" value="" data-validation-constraints='["NotBlank":{},"MinLength":{"limit":6}]' /> </div> The JavaScript part then would be to find all <input> elements that have the data-validation-constraints attribute and create the correct validation for them. To pass the validation constraints to the form view i thought the best way would be to create a form type extension. That's the point of my Question: Is this the correct way? And how is this possible? At the Moment my form type extension looks like this: use Symfony\Component\Form\FormInterface; use Symfony\Component\Form\FormView; use Symfony\Component\Form\FormBuilder; class FieldTypeExtension extends \Symfony\Component\Form\AbstractTypeExtension{ public function getExtendedType(){ return 'field'; } public function buildView(FormView $view, FormInterface $form) { // at this point i didn't find a way to get the // validation constraints out of the $form // the `getAllValidationConstraints` here is just an example $view->set('validation_constraints', $form->getAllValidationConstraints()); } } How can i get all validation constraints applied to one form field out of the FormInterface object?

Read the article

Define "Validation in the Model"

- by sunwukung

There have been a couple of discussions regarding the location of user input validation: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/659950/should-validation-be-done-in-form-objects-or-the-model http://stackoverflow.com/questions/134388/where-do-you-do-your-validation-model-controller-or-view These discussions were quite old, so I wanted to ask the question again to see if anyone had any fresh input. If not, I apologise in advance. If you come from the Validation in the Model camp - does Model mean OOP representation of data (i.e. Active Record/Data Mapper) as "Entity" (to borrow the DDD terminology) - in which case you would, I assume, want all Model classes to inherit common validation constraints. Or can these rules simply be part of a Service in the Model - i.e. a Validation service? For example, could you consider Zend_Form and it's validation classes part of the Model? The concept of a Domain Model does not appear to be limited to Entities, and so validation may not necessarily need to be confined to this Entities. It seems that you would require a lot of potentially superfluous handing of values and responses back and forth between forms and "Entities" - and in some instances you may not persist the data recieved from user input, or recieve it from user input at all.

Read the article

ASP.NET MVC 2 validation using DTOs instead of domain entities

- by Kevin Pang

I'm struggling to mesh two best practices together: Using DataAnnotations + ModelBinding for validation in ASP.NET MVC 2 Using DTOs instead of domain entities when passing data via the ViewModel If I want to pass over DTOs instead of domain entities, then leveraging DataAnnotations + ModelBinding for validation would require me to specify validation attributes on my DTO classes. This results in a lot of duplicated work since multiple DTOs may hold overlapping fields with the same validation restrictions. This means that any time I change a validation rule in my domain, I have to go find all DTOs that correspond with that value and update their validation attributes.

Read the article

WPF Validation with ContentPresenter

- by Chris

Hi, I have a WPF user control which needs to validate some fields. It is bound to a class implementing IDataErrorInfo. When I set the user control as the content of my ContentPresenter in another, already open, window, I can see validation occurring, and error messages being returned, however, I don't get any validation adorner - e.g. the default red outline. If I enter the field and leave it (triggering re-validation) the validation adorner appears. Also, if I show the user control in it's own window it shows the validation adorner immediately. (I'm using Caliburn IResults to do this underneath, e.g. Show.Dialog<VM>(); but I suspect this isn't related) Can anyone offer any suggestion why the validation adorners aren't appearing immediately. (I had guessed animation on my ContentPresenter ContentChanged, however, I have removed this and still experience the problem. thanks, Chris

Read the article

URL encoding for latin characters in Java

- by sammichy

I'm trying to read in an image URL. As mentioned in the java documentation, I tried converting the URL to URI by String imageURL = "http://www.shefinds.com/files/Christian-Louboutin-Décolleté-100-pumps.jpg"; URL url = new URL(imageURL); url = new URI(url.getProtocol(), url.getHost(), url.getFile(), null).toURL(); URLConnection conn = url.openConnection(); InputStream is = conn.getInputStream(); I get the following error when the code is executed http://www.shefinds.com/files/Christian-Louboutin-DÃ©colletÃ©-100-pumps.jpg What am I doing wrong and what is the right way to encode this URL?

Read the article

Is there a way to validates_presence_of only one time? (to skip that validation once the user's been

- by GoodGets

So, I'd like for a user to see an error message if he submits a comment and the :name is blank (typical error message, don't need help with that). However, I'd then like to allow the user to skip that validation once he's been notified that "we like all comments to have a name." So, he submits the comment once, sees the notification, then can submit the form again unchanged if he really doesn't want to add a name, and the validates_presences_of :name is skipped. But, I'm not sure how to go about doing this. I thought about checking to see where the request is coming from, but after a create, errors are handed off to the "new" action, which is the same as actual "new" comments. I then thought about checking to see if flash[errors] were present, but that won't work because there are other validations a comment has to pass. Finally, I thought about trying a validates_presences_of :name, :unless = :notified but wasn't sure how to define notified. I honestly hate asking such an open ended question, but wasn't sure where to get started. So, is there a way to just check a certain validation once?

Search Results

Search found 22416 results on 897 pages for 'url validation'.

Page 12/897 | < Previous Page | 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 | Next Page >

- by slow diver

- by chrizzbee

- by Dejan Pelzel

- by Brendon

- by Xianlin

- by herrherr

- by Dan

- by Dane411

- by Biggroover

- by Mike Deck

- by themanbehindoftheprojectmayhem

- by David Corley

- by jarus

- by marharépa

- by Robert Cabri

- by Vilx-

- by user32642

- by bilygates

- by Matthew

- by ausi

- by sunwukung

- by Kevin Pang

- by Chris

- by sammichy

- by GoodGets

< Previous Page | 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 | Next Page >