Search Results

Search found 33538 results on 1342 pages for 'select query'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 122/1342 | < Previous Page | 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129  | Next Page >

  • MySql selecting default value if there are no result?

    - by Kenan
    i'm having 2 tables: members and comments. I select all members, and then join comments. But in comments I'm selecting some SUM of points, and if user never commented, I can't get that user in listing?! So how to select default value for SUM, or some other solution: SELECT c.comment_id AS item_id, m.member_id AS member_id, m.avatar, SUM(c.vote_value) AS vote_value, SUM(c.best) AS best, SUM(c.vote_value) + SUM(c.najbolji)*10 AS total FROM members m LEFT JOIN comments c ON m.member_id = c.author_id GROUP BY c.author_id ORDER BY m.member_id DESC LIMIT {$sql_start}, {$sql_pokazi}

    Read the article

  • Cost of logic in a query

    - by FrustratedWithFormsDesigner
    I have a query that looks something like this: select xmlelement("rootNode", (case when XH.ID is not null then xmlelement("xhID", XH.ID) else xmlelement("xhID", xmlattributes('true' AS "xsi:nil"), XH.ID) end), (case when XH.SER_NUM is not null then xmlelement("serialNumber", XH.SER_NUM) else xmlelement("serialNumber", xmlattributes('true' AS "xsi:nil"), XH.SER_NUM) end), /*repeat this pattern for many more columns from the same table...*/ FROM XH WHERE XH.ID = 'SOMETHINGOROTHER' It's ugly and I don't like it, and it is also the slowest executing query (there are others of similar form, but much smaller and they aren't causing any major problems - yet). Maintenance is relatively easy as this is mostly a generated query, but my concern now is for performance. I am wondering how much of an overhead there is for all of these case expressions. To see if there was any difference, I wrote another version of this query as: select xmlelement("rootNode", xmlforest(XH.ID, XH.SER_NUM,... (I know that this query does not produce exactly the same, thing, my plan was to move the logic to PL/SQL or XSL) I tried to get execution plans for both versions, but they are the same. I'm guessing that the logic does not get factored into the execution plan. My gut tells me the second version should execute faster, but I'd like some way to prove that (other than writing a PL/SQL test function with timing statements before and after the query and running that code over and over again to get a test sample). Is it possible to get a good idea of how much the case-when will cost? Also, I could write the case-when using the decode function instead. Would that perform better (than case-statements)?

    Read the article

  • SQL WHERE.. IN clause multiple columns

    - by ala
    i need to implement the following query in SQL Server select * from table1 WHERE (CM_PLAN_ID,Individual_ID) IN ( Select CM_PLAN_ID, Individual_ID From CRM_VCM_CURRENT_LEAD_STATUS Where Lead_Key = :_Lead_Key ) but the WHERE..IN clause allows only 1 column. How to compare 2 or more columns with another inner select?

    Read the article

  • MySQL multiple dependent subqueries, painfully slow

    - by matt80
    I have a working query that retrieves the data that I need, but unfortunately it is painfully slow (runs over 3 minutes). I have indexes in place, but I think the problem is the multiple dependent subqueries. I've been trying to rewrite the query using joins but I can't seem to get it to work. Any help would be greatly appreciated. The tables: Basically, I have 2 tables. The first (prices) holds the prices of items in a store. Each row is the price of an item that day, and new rows are added every day with an updated price. The second table (watches_US) holds the item information (name, description, etc). CREATE TABLE `prices` ( `prices_id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `prices_locale` enum('CA','DE','FR','JP','UK','US') NOT NULL default 'US', `prices_watches_ID` char(10) NOT NULL, `prices_date` datetime NOT NULL, `prices_am` varchar(10) default NULL, `prices_new` varchar(10) default NULL, `prices_used` varchar(10) default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`prices_id`), KEY `prices_am` (`prices_am`), KEY `prices_locale` (`prices_locale`), KEY `prices_watches_ID` (`prices_watches_ID`), KEY `prices_date` (`prices_date`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=61764 ; CREATE TABLE `watches_US` ( `watches_ID` char(10) NOT NULL, `watches_date_added` datetime NOT NULL, `watches_last_update` datetime default NULL, `watches_title` varchar(255) default NULL, `watches_small_image_height` int(11) default NULL, `watches_small_image_width` int(11) default NULL, `watches_description` text, PRIMARY KEY (`watches_ID`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8; The query retrieves the last 10 prices changes over a period of 30 hours, ordered by the size of the price change. So I have subqueries to get the newest price, the oldest price within 30 hours, and then to calculate the price change. Here's the query: SELECT watches_US.*, prices.*, watches_US.watches_ID as current_ID, ( SELECT prices_am FROM prices WHERE prices_watches_ID = current_ID AND prices_locale = 'US' ORDER BY prices_date DESC LIMIT 1 ) as new_price, ( SELECT prices_date FROM prices WHERE prices_watches_ID = current_ID AND prices_locale = 'US' ORDER BY prices_date DESC LIMIT 1 ) as new_price_date, ( SELECT prices_am FROM prices WHERE ( prices_watches_ID = current_ID AND prices_locale = 'US') AND ( prices_date >= DATE_SUB(new_price_date,INTERVAL 30 HOUR) ) ORDER BY prices_date ASC LIMIT 1 ) as old_price, ( SELECT ROUND(((new_price - old_price)/old_price)*100,2) ) as percent_change, ( SELECT (new_price - old_price) ) as absolute_change FROM watches_US LEFT OUTER JOIN prices ON prices.prices_watches_ID = watches_US.watches_ID WHERE ( prices_locale = 'US' ) AND ( prices_am IS NOT NULL ) AND ( prices_am != '' ) HAVING ( old_price IS NOT NULL ) AND ( old_price != 0 ) AND ( old_price != '' ) AND ( absolute_change < 0 ) AND ( prices.prices_date = new_price_date ) ORDER BY absolute_change ASC LIMIT 10 How would I rewrite this to use joins instead, or otherwise optimize this so it doesn't take over 3 minutes to get a result? Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you kindly.

    Read the article

  • How do I write this GROUP BY in mysql UNION query

    - by user1652368
    Trying to group the results of two queries together. When I run this query: SELECT pr_id, pr_sbtcode, pr_sdesc, od_quantity, od_amount FROM ( SELECT `bgProducts`.`pr_id`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sbtcode`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sdesc`, SUM(`od_quantity`) AS `od_quantity`, SUM(`od_amount`) AS `od_amount`, MIN(UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`)) AS `or_date` FROM `bgOrderMain` JOIN `bgOrderData` JOIN `bgProducts` WHERE `bgOrderMain`.`or_id` = `bgOrderData`.`or_id` AND `od_pr` = `pr_id` AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) >= '1262322000' AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) <= '1346990399' AND (`pr_id` = '415' OR `pr_id` = '1088') GROUP BY `bgProducts`.`pr_id` UNION SELECT `bgProducts`.`pr_id`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sbtcode`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sdesc`,SUM(`od_quantity`) AS `od_quantity`, SUM(`od_amount`) AS `od_amount`, MIN(UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`)) AS `or_date` FROM `npOrderMain` JOIN `npOrderData` JOIN `bgProducts` WHERE `npOrderMain`.`or_id` = `npOrderData`.`or_id` AND `od_pr` = `pr_id` AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) >= '1262322000' AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) <= '1346990399' AND (`pr_id` = '415' OR `pr_id` = '1088') GROUP BY `bgProducts`.`pr_id` ) TEMPTABLE3; it produces this result +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | pr_id | pr_sbtcode | pr_sdesc | od_quantity | od_amount +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | 415 | NP13 | Product 13 | 5 | 125 | 1088 | NPAW | Product AW | 4 | 100 | 415 | NP13 | Product 13 | 5 | 125 | 1088 | NPAW | Product AW | 2 | 50 +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+</pre> What I want to get a result that combines those into 2 lines: +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | pr_id | pr_sbtcode | pr_sdesc | od_quantity | od_amount +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | 415 | NP13 | Product 13 | 10 | 250 | 1088 | NPAW | Product AW | 6 | 150 +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+</pre> So I added GROUP BY pr_id to the end of the query: SELECT pr_id, pr_sbtcode, pr_sdesc, od_quantity, od_amount FROM ( SELECT `bgProducts`.`pr_id`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sbtcode`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sdesc`, SUM(`od_quantity`) AS `od_quantity`, SUM(`od_amount`) AS `od_amount`, MIN(UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`)) AS `or_date` FROM `bgOrderMain` JOIN `bgOrderData` JOIN `bgProducts` WHERE `bgOrderMain`.`or_id` = `bgOrderData`.`or_id` AND `od_pr` = `pr_id` AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) >= '1262322000' AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) <= '1346990399' AND (`pr_id` = '415' OR `pr_id` = '1088') GROUP BY `bgProducts`.`pr_id` UNION SELECT `bgProducts`.`pr_id`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sbtcode`, `bgProducts`.`pr_sdesc`,SUM(`od_quantity`) AS `od_quantity`, SUM(`od_amount`) AS `od_amount`, MIN(UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`)) AS `or_date` FROM `npOrderMain` JOIN `npOrderData` JOIN `bgProducts` WHERE `npOrderMain`.`or_id` = `npOrderData`.`or_id` AND `od_pr` = `pr_id` AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) >= '1262322000' AND UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`or_date`) <= '1346990399' AND (`pr_id` = '415' OR `pr_id` = '1088') GROUP BY `bgProducts`.`pr_id` ) TEMPTABLE3 GROUP BY pr_id; But that just gives me this: +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | pr_id | pr_sbtcode | pr_sdesc | od_quantity | od_amount +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ | 415 | NP13 | Product 13 | 5 | 125 | 1088 | NPAW | Product AW | 4 | 100 +-------+------------+--------------------------+-------------+-----------+ What am I missing here??

    Read the article

  • What's the best way to get a bunch of rows from MySQL if you have an array of integer primary keys?

    - by Evan P.
    I have a MySQL table with an auto-incremented integer primary key. I want to get a bunch of rows from the table based on an array of integers I have in memory in my program. The array ranges from a handful to about 1000 items. What's the most efficient query syntax to get the rows? I can think of a few: "SELECT * FROM thetable WHERE id IN (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)" (this is what I do now) "SELECT * FROM thetable where id = 1 OR id = 2 OR id = 3" Multiple queries of the form "SELECT * FROM thetable WHERE id = 1". Probably the most friendly to the query cache, but expensive due to having lots of query parsing. A union, like "SELECT * FROM thetable WHERE id = 1 UNION SELECT * FROM thetable WHERE id = 2 ..." I'm not sure if MySQL caches the results of each query; it's also the most verbose format. I think using the NoSQL interface in MySQL 5.6+ would be the most efficient way to do this, but I'm not yet up to MySQL 5.6.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Querying An XML Field

    - by Gavin Draper
    I have a table that contains some meta data in an XML field. For example <Meta> <From>[email protected]</From> <To> <Address>[email protected]</Address> <Address>[email protected]</Address> </To> <Subject>ESubject Goes Here</Subject> </Meta> I want to then be able to query this field to return the following results From To Subject [email protected] [email protected] Subject Goes Here [email protected] [email protected] Subject Goes Here I've written the following query SELECT MetaData.query('data(/Meta/From)') AS [From], MetaData.query('data(/Meta/To/Address)') AS [To], MetaData.query('data(/Meta/Subject)') AS [Subject] FROM Documents However this only returns one record for that XML field. It combines both the 2 addresses into one result. Is it possible for split these on to separate records? The result I'm getting is From To Subject [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Subject Goes Here Thanks Gav

    Read the article

  • XPath Query - Select relative top level nodes

    - by John
    I'm trying to iterate over some elements in an XML document that may be nested, but as I iterate over them I may be removing some from the tree. I'm thinking the best way is to do this recursively, so I'm trying to come up with an XPath Query that will select all the top-level nodes relative to the current node. //foo[not(ancestor::foo)] works great at the document level, but I'm trying to figure out how to do this from a relative query. <foo id="1"> <foo id="2" /> <foo id="3"> <foo id="4"> <bar> <foo id="5"> <foo id="6" /> </foo> <foo id="7" /> </bar> </foo> </foo> </foo> If the current node is foo#3, I only want to select foo#4. When the current node is foo#4, I only want to select foo#5 and foo#7. I think I'm trying to select any descendant foo nodes of the current node, but without any ancestor foo nodes between the current node and the node I'm selecting. My conundrum is if we're already inside a foo node, not(ancestor::foo) doesn't help.

    Read the article

  • Select multiple records by one query

    - by kofto4ka
    Hello there. Please, give me advice, how to construct select query. I have table table with fields type and obj_id. I want to select all records in concordance with next array: $arr = array( 0 => array('type' => 1, 'obj_id' => 5), 1 => array('type' => 3, 'obj_id' => 15), 2 => array('type' => 4, 'obj_id' => 14), 3 => array('type' => 12, 'obj_id' => 17), ); I want to select needed rows by one query, is it real? Smth like select * from `table` where type in (1,3,4,12) and obj_id in (5,15,14,17) But this query returns also records with type = 3 and obj_id = 14, and for example type = 1 and obj_id = 17. p.s. moderators, please fix my title, I dont know how to describe my question.

    Read the article

  • Dates that intersect

    - by MikeAbyss
    Hi everyone, I've been researching this problem for awhile now and I can't seem to come to a solution, hopefully someone here can help. Currently I'm working with Microsoft SQL server management, I've been trying to do the following: Previously, the old query would just return the results that fit between two dates Heres the previous query: SELECT e.Name, o.StartDate, o.EndDate FROM dbo.Name e, dbo.Date o WHERE where e.Name = o.Name and o.StartDate <= '2010-09-28 23:59:59' and o.EndDate >= '2010-9-28 00:00:00' and e.Name like 'A' Example table that is produced after the query runs (The real table has a lot more rows obviously :P) : Name Start End A 2010-09-28 07:00:00 2010-09-28 17:00:00 A 2010-09-28 13:45:00 2010-09-28 18:00:00 A 2010-09-28 08:00:00 2010-09-28 16:00:00 A 2010-09-28 07:00:00 2010-09-28 15:30:00 However we need to change this, so that the query does the following: find the dates that intersect for a day x find the dates that don't intersect for a day x I've found a real useful site regarding this http://bloggingabout.net/blogs/egiardina/archive/2008/01/30/check-intersection-of-two-date-ranges-in-sql.aspx However the date to compare against is inputted, mine on the other hand has to all dates that intersect/don't intersect. Thanks for the help everyone.

    Read the article

  • MySQL Update query with left join and group by

    - by Rob
    I am trying to create an update query and making little progress in getting the right syntax. The following query is working: SELECT t.Index1, t.Index2, COUNT( m.EventType ) FROM Table t LEFT JOIN MEvents m ON (m.Index1 = t.Index1 AND m.Index2 = t.Index2 AND (m.EventType = 'A' OR m.EventType = 'B') ) WHERE (t.SpecialEventCount IS NULL) GROUP BY t.Index1, t.Index2 It creates a list of triplets Index1,Index2,EventCounts. It only does this for case where t.SpecialEventCount is NULL. The update query I am trying to write should set this SpecialEventCount to that count, i.e. COUNT(m.EventType) in the query above. This number could be 0 or any positive number (hence the left join). Index1 and Index2 together are unique in Table t and they are used to identify events in MEvent. How do I have to modify the select query to become an update query? I.e. something like UPDATE Table SET SpecialEventCount=COUNT(m.EventType)..... but I am confused what to put where and have failed with numerous different guesses.

    Read the article

  • Question about Benchmark function in Mysql ( Incredible results ).

    - by xRobot
    I have 2 tables: author with 3 millions of rows. book with 20 miles rows. . So I have benchmarked this query with a join: SELECT BENCHMARK(100000000, 'SELECT book.title, author.name FROM `book` , `author` WHERE book.id = author.book_id ') And this is the result: Query took 0.7438 sec ONLY 0.7438 seconds for 100 millions of query with a join ??? Do I make some mistakes or this is the right result ?

    Read the article

  • SQL Server GROUP BY troubles!

    - by Lucas311
    I'm getting a frustrating error in one of my SQL Server 2008 queries. It parses fine, but crashes when I try to execute. The error I get is the following: Msg 8120, Level 16, State 1, Line 4 Column 'customertraffic_return.company' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause. SELECT * FROM (SELECT ctr.sp_id AS spid, Substring(ctr.company, 1, 20) AS company, cci.email_address AS tech_email, CASE WHEN rating IS NULL THEN 'unknown' ELSE rating END AS rating FROM customer_contactinfo cci INNER JOIN customertraffic_return ctr ON ctr.sp_id = cci.sp_id WHERE cci.email_address <> '' AND cci.email_address NOT LIKE '%hotmail%' AND cci.email_address IS NOT NULL AND ( region LIKE 'Europe%' OR region LIKE 'Asia%' ) AND SERVICE IN ( '1', '2' ) AND ( rating IN ( 'Premiere', 'Standard', 'unknown' ) OR rating IS NULL ) AND msgcount >= 5000 GROUP BY ctr.sp_id, cci.email_address) AS a WHERE spid NOT IN (SELECT spid FROM customer_exclude) GROUP BY spid, tech_email

    Read the article

  • select dropdown option by value using jquery

    - by user1765862
    I have select following html structure <select id="mainMenu" data-mini="true" name="select-choice-min"> <option value="1">1</option> <option value="2">2</option> <option value="3">3</option> <option value="4">4</option> <option value="5">5</option> <option value="6">6</option> </select> on page load I want initially set option with value 5 so I tried (but nothing changed) $(document).ready(function () { $('#mainMenu option').eq(5).prop('selected', true); }) I'm using jquery 1.8.3 and jqueyr mobile since this is mobile website <script src="/Scripts/jquery-1.8.3.js"></script> <script src="/Scripts/jquery.mobile-1.4.2.js"></script> UPDATE: I just realize that every code from posted answers works (as well as mine), #mainMenu option value is set to desired value (5) but it's text doesnt change (in any of this scenarios). Is this normal and is there workarround for this. I tried $("mainMenu").text("5");

    Read the article

  • Display the value of a select list without a button

    - by Max Zeygelshefer
    How can I get the value to be displayed after the selection from the list is made, without the use of a button. I tried to implement an onChange event for the select list, and doing away with the button, but I can't get it to work. I'd like the value (1,2,3) to display below the select box after an option (a,b,c) is selected. <script> function displayResult() { this.nextSibling.nodeValue = document.getElementById("mySelect").value; } </script> <body> <form> <select id="mySelect" style="width:220px"> <option value="1">a</option> <option value="2">b</option> <option value="3">c</option> </select> </form> <button type="button" onclick="displayResult.call(this)">List Locations</button>

    Read the article

  • SQL RDBMS : one query or multiple calls

    - by None None
    After looking around the internet, I decided to create DAOs that returned objects (POJOs) to the calling business logic function/method. For example: a Customer object with a Address reference would be split in the RDBMS into two tables; Customer and ADDRESS. The CustomerDAO would be in charge of joining the data from the two tables and create both an Address POJO and Customer POJO adding the address to the customer object. Finally return the fulll Customer POJO. Simple, however, now i am at a point where i need to join three or four tables and each representing an attribute or list of attributes for the resulting POJO. The sql will include a group by but i will still result with multiple rows for the same pojo, because some of the tables are joining a one to many relationship. My app code will now have to loop through all the rows trying to figure out if the rows are the same with different attributes or if the record should be a new POJO. Should I continue to create my daos using this technique or break up my Pojo creation into multiple db calls to make the code easier to understand and maintain?

    Read the article

  • how to get a text box with the value selected in select box

    - by udaya
    hi This is my view page here i have a select box <tr> <td>Chidren</td> <td>:</td> <td><select style="font-family: verdana; min-width: 52px;" id="ddlChildren" name="ddlChildren" class="required" onChange="return Check_Adult('dd1Age')" > <option value="">children</option> <option value="1">1</option> <option value="2">2</option> <option value="3">3</option> <option value="4">4</option></select> </td> </tr> with the value from select box if the value is one then i need to create a text box if the value is two then i need to create two ,,, and respectively In my Check_Adult javascript function ,,I did this function Check_Adult() { var Child= document.getElementById('ddlChildren').value; if( Child==1) { <? echo '<input type="text" name="child" id="child">' ?> } } But the text box is not created how to create it?

    Read the article

  • MySql mutliple tables

    - by Chris Harrison
    I've been looking into JOIN, subqueries and other ways of doing this, but I can't work out the best way to do this is... I have a table (ps_category_product): id_product, id_category I want to perform a query on it like: SELECT id_product FROM ps_category_product WHERE id_category='$this_cat' BUT, I only want to perform this query where the ID's are returned by a query on another table (ps_product): id_product, active SELECT id_product FROM ps_product WHERE active='1' Can anyone help me with getting these two queries working together?

    Read the article

  • mysql join with conditional

    - by Conor H
    Hi There, I am currently working on a MySQL query that contains a table: TBL:lesson_fee -fee_type_id (PRI) -lesson_type_id (PRI) -lesson_fee_amount this table contains the fees for a particular 'lesson type' and there are different 'fee names' (fee_type). Which means that there can be many entries in this table for one 'lesson type' In my query I am joining this table onto the rest of the query via the 'lesson_type' table using: lesson_fee INNER JOIN (other joins here) ON lesson_fee.lesson_type_id = lesson_type.lesson_type_id The problem with this is that it is currently returning duplicate data in the result. 1 row for every duplicate entry in the 'lesson fee' table. I am also joining the 'fee type' table using this 'fee_type_id' Is there a way of telling MySQL to say "Join the lesson_fee table rows that have lesson_fee.lesson_type_id and fee_type_id = client.fee_type_id". UPDATE: Query: SELECT lesson_booking.lesson_booking_id,lesson_fee.lesson_fee_amount FROM fee_type INNER JOIN (lesson_fee INNER JOIN (color_code INNER JOIN (employee INNER JOIN (horse_owned INNER JOIN (lesson_type INNER JOIN (timetable INNER JOIN (lesson_booking INNER JOIN CLIENT ON client.client_id = lesson_booking.client_id) ON lesson_booking.timetable_id = timetable.timetable_id) ON lesson_type.lesson_type_id = timetable.lesson_type_id) ON horse_owned.horse_owned_id = lesson_booking.horse_owned_id) ON employee.employee_id = timetable.employee_id) ON employee.color_code_id = color_code.color_code_id) ON lesson_fee.lesson_type_id = lesson_type.lesson_type_id) ON lesson_fee.fee_type_id = client.fee_type_id WHERE booking_date = '2010-04-06' ORDER BY lesson_booking_id ASC How do I keep the format(indentation) of my query?

    Read the article

  • Creating ASP.NET 3.5 Admin Pages using a Query String in a Master Page

    This is the continuation of part one which ran on Tuesday of last week. After deleting the styles lt style type= text css gt in the head section of MasterPage.master you will need to create an external CSS to solve the relative URL problems in the website. This will ensure that the background images and links work according to the master page design. This article will explain how to do this and more.... Comcast? Business Class - Official Site Learn About Comcast Small Business Services. Best in Phone, TV & Internet.

    Read the article

  • SSMS: The Query Window Keyboard Shortcuts

    Simple-Talk's free wallchart of the most important SSMS keyboard shortcuts aims to help find all those curiously forgettable key combinations within SQL Server Management Studio that unlock the hidden magic that is available for editing and executing queries. The Future of SQL Server MonitoringMonitor wherever, whenever with Red Gate's SQL Monitor. See it live in action now.

    Read the article

  • Change $mailTo variable based on select input value (array)

    - by Dirty Bird Design
    I have the following select list: <form action="mail.php" method="POST"> <select name="foo" id="foo"> <option value="sales">Sales</option> <option value="salesAssist">Sales Assist</option> <option value="billing">Billing</option> <option value="billingAssist">Billing Assist</option> </select> </form> I need to route the $mailTo variable depending on which option they select, Sales and Sales Assist go to [email protected], while Billing and Billing Assist go to [email protected] PHP pseudeo code! <? php $_POST['foo'] if inArray(sales, salesAssist) foo="[email protected]"; else if inArray(billing, billingAssist) foo="[email protected]"; mailTo="foo" ?> I know there is nothing correct about the above, but you can see what I am trying to do, change a variable's value based on the selected value. I don't want to do this with JS, would rather learn more PHP here. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • which one is a faster/better sql practice?

    - by artsince
    Suppose I have a 2 column table (id, flag) and id is sequential. I expect this table to contain a lot of records. I want to periodically select the first row not flagged and update it. Some of the records on the way may have already been flagged, so I want to skip them. Does it make more sense if I store the last id I flagged and use it in my select statement, like select * from mytable where id > my_last_id order by id asc limit 1 or simply get the first unflagged row, like: select * from mytable where flagged = 'F' order by id asc limit 1 Thank you!

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129  | Next Page >