Search Results

Search found 11906 results on 477 pages for 'ip restrictions'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 13/477 | < Previous Page | 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  | Next Page >

  • How to find my VPN client IP in windows

    - by cateof
    When I run ipconfig and I get the following: C:\Documents and Settings\grmsrh14>ipconfig Windows IP Configuration Ethernet adapter Wireless Network Connection: Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 112.25.2.222 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.254.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 112.25.2.1 DHCP Class ID . . . . . . . . . . : rise Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2: Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected PPP adapter my_lab: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 10.2.251.41 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.255 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : Is there a command that prints only the my_lab(VPN) IP address, ie 10.2.251.41?

    Read the article

  • Impact of Changing IP Address of Outgoing IP Packets From My Network

    - by iamrohitbanga
    If I modify the source ip address of all outgoing ip packets from my network to an ip address belonging to someone else (while ensuring that the checksum is correct) then what will happen. Assume that I have a public IP address connected by a point-to-point link to an ISP. Will the ISP check that the IP address in my IP packets is correct or will it just forward the packets. I believe that ISP should just forward the packets. what mechanisms are present in the Internet that prevent this from happening?

    Read the article

  • If an visitors IP address contains "google" or a similar keyword, does this mean they were a crawler?

    - by Roscoe
    Hi, I have a huge list of IP addresses recorded from various visitors to a website. A huge amount of the visitors, in some months over 70%, came from IP addresses that contained keywords such as google, yahoo, bot, crawler, etc. Does this mean that those users were infact search engine crawlers? If so, why are their so many crawlers in my visitor records in comparison to genuine human visitors? (and if not what's the explanation?) Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Routing static IP traffic on a Comcast Business Class IP Gateway (SMCD3G-CCR)

    - by Jakobud
    We are in the process of replacing our firewall, which is currently the only thing connected to our Comcast Business Class modem. Comcast gives us 5 static IP addresses. Currently, all traffic to all 5 static IPs goes directly to the existing firewall. Eventually, obviously all traffic will goto the new firewall, once the old firewall is removed from the network. But in the meantime, as we will have two firewalls plugged into the same Comcast modem, I need to route certain traffic to the new firewall instead of the old one. The firewall switchover is going to be slow and gradual as I am testing it, so I can't simply unplug the existing firewall and plug in the new one. So my question is, how do I tell the modem to route all traffic that goes to a specific IP to goto the new firewall instead of the old one? I've logged into the web interface for the modem, but the available options aren't very clear. There is a 1-to-1 NAT option (which I can't seem to get the interface for it to work properly) but I also see a "Static Routing" section. I always understood Static Routing to refer to routing data within the LAN though, so I'm not sure if that's what I'm looking for or not. Keep in mind, I'm not looking to do simple port forwarding. I'm wanting 100% of traffic to certain public static IPs to go to the specified connected firewall (I'll deal with service policies there). The modem is an SMC SMCD3G-CCR and is labeled as a Comcast Business Class Business IP Gateway. Any help or direction would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • No external src ip in log files (my router ip appears instead)

    - by bongo_fury
    I recently retired my workhorse WRT54G router/AP in favor of a Linksys EA2700. Since then, all inbound traffic (bound to an Ubuntu 10.02 box running LAMP)logged to Syslog, Apache's error and access logs, etc. (all behind said router) is getting logged with a src ip of 192.168.1.1, that of the router's internal ip. For example, here is an old entry from apache's access.log: 74.82.68.20 - - [22/Feb/2011:10:14:34 -0600] "GET /assets/css/style.css HTTP/1.1" 304 154 "http://example.com/view.php?event_id=1" "BlackBerry8520/5.0.0.822 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/100" And here is one since switching the router: 192.168.1.1 - - [05/Oct/2012:21:29:25 -0500] "GET /somedir/print.css HTTP/1.1" 200 650 "http://example.com/somedir/" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1"** That first field is the problem. Each and every entry in every log shows an "external" IP of 192.168.1.1, which isn't very helpful. Any ideas? Much thanks from a n00b!

    Read the article

  • Secondary IP (eth0:0) acts like main server IP

    - by George Tasioulis
    I have a CentOS server, configured with 4 consecutive IPs: eth0 5.x.x.251 eth0:0 5.x.x.252 eth0:1 5.x.x.253 eth0:2 5.x.x.254 The problem is that all traffic goes out to the internet with eth0:0 (5.x.x.252) as the source IP, instead of eth0. # curl ifconfig.me 5.x.x.252 How can I fix this, so that all traffic goes out via eth0, ie my main IP? PS: My server is VPS running on a Xen dom0, the latter being configured in routed mode networking. Thanks in advance! Server configuration # ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:x:x:x:x:AE inet addr:5.x.x.251 Bcast:5.x.x.255 Mask:255.255.255.255 inet6 addr: fe80::x:x:x:x/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:14675569 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:9463227 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:4122016502 (3.8 GiB) TX bytes:25959110751 (24.1 GiB) Interrupt:23 eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:x:x:x:x:AE inet addr:5.x.x.252 Bcast:5.x.x.255 Mask:255.255.255.224 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:23 eth0:1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:x:x:x:x:AE inet addr:5.x.x.253 Bcast:5.x.x.255 Mask:255.255.255.224 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:23 eth0:2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:x:x:x:x:AE inet addr:5.x.x.254 Bcast:5.x.x.255 Mask:255.255.255.224 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:23 # cat /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost 5.x.x.251 [fqdn] [hostname] # cat ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static ONBOOT=yes IPADDR=5.x.x.251 NETMASK=255.255.255.224 SCOPE="peer 5.x.y.82" # cat ifcfg-eth0:0 DEVICE=eth0:0 BOOTPROTO=static ONBOOT=yes IPADDR=5.x.x.252 NETMASK=255.255.255.224 # cat route-eth0 ADDRESS0=0.0.0.0 NETMASK0=0.0.0.0 GATEWAY0=5.x.y.82 # netstat -rn Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 5.x.y.82 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0 5.x.x.224 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 5.x.y.82 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

    Read the article

  • Static IP on FEDORA12 from Virtualbox

    - by Diego Castro
    I'm trying to get my FEDORA12 to have an STATIC IP - inside virtualbox - inside Ubuntu Let me rephrase that. I have an Ubuntu 9.04 system with vitualbox and a FEDORA12 vm there and I would like to put the fedora with an STATIC IP (amahi needs it), but I'm getting stuck... I'm using NAT (if that's any help) I tryid a few tutorials, but no go. I'm kind of new to the *nix world but I'm old school on M$ Edit: Screenshots UBUNTU 9.04 (host that has the vm) hxxp://pic.imagefap.com/images/full/43/154/1548751086.jpg FEDORA hxxp://pic.imagefap.com/images/full/43/205/2050216515.jpg hxxp://pic.imagefap.com/images/full/43/118/1182276176.jpg (sory cant post pics... not enough rep)

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu 8.04 server is not retaining a static IP address

    - by James Pierce
    I recently setup a linux box running Ubuntu 8.04 (to match another server with 8.04). I need to insure that this box has a static IP address and I changed /etc/network/interfaces to set up the static IP address and when I run sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart it works fine for a while, but always reverts back to 10.0.1.24 after being idle for a while. I also tried stopping/removing the dhcp client, but that didn't help. sudo /etc/init.d/dhcp stop sudo apt-get remove dhcp3-client Here is my /etc/init.d/networking: # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The primary network interface auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 10.0.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.1.255 gateway 10.0.1.1 Any thoughts? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • ip addresses/domain names are geographical bound?

    - by ajsie
    i wonder if ips are bound to specific geolocations? lets say that i've got this ip 111.111.111.111 from my ISP to my home computer in France. is it possible for me to use this ip in Norway? and the same goes with domain names. if iv'e got a domain name like mydomain.de, does it mean that my computer has to be in Germany or could it be located in Denmark? cause i always wonder where the actual server is located every time a website got different top level domains, eg google.dk, google.fr, google.de and so on. are they located in same country as the top domain or doesnt it matter?

    Read the article

  • Duplicate IP address detection with multiple NICs

    - by sfink
    I am using arping -D to detect duplicate IP addresses within a network when setting up servers. (The network is controlled by someone else, and we have had many issues with IP allocation in the past.) It works fine as long as my host has a single NIC on a given VLAN, but when my host has more than one (I have one with 9 NICs on one VLAN and 1 on the other), arping -D always returns false collisions. The problem is that all 9 of my NICs respond to an ARP request for any of the IPs on those NICs. (These are real physical NICs, not aliases or anything.) I send out one ARP request packet, and get 9 ARP is-at ARP replies, one for each MAC address. I could implement my own solution by sniffing packets and checking for any replies with a MAC address other than the local NICs', but it seems like there ought to be an easier way.

    Read the article

  • Problem Assigning Static IP to CentOS Server

    - by nategood
    We have a sandbox server running CentOS that we run inside our office. Our ISP has assigned us a block of 5 static IPs. We now want to assign it a static IP. DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none # have also tried "static" here HWADDR=00:13:72:*:*:* ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet NETMASK=255.255.255.0 IPADDR=173.*.*.161 GATEWAY=10.1.10.1 /etc/resolv.cnf is also set with the appropriate name servers from our ISP. When I ifdown eth0 then ifup eth0 I get... SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable When I switch to DCHP, the machine has an IP assigned and there are no connection problems. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Subnet mask and how to resolve IP range [duplicate]

    - by user2789433
    This question already has an answer here: How does IPv4 Subnetting Work? 5 answers If you click on this link WHO IS query You will see the results from a who is query for a random IP address. On the line "inetnum": "122.4.0.0/14", What does it mean for the prefix to be 14? I am using this as a reference Subnet Mask Cheatsheet While resolving it, I get a very wide range which is something like 122.7.0.0-122.4.0.0 I am not able to understand how the IP range is calculate from the subnet mask and I am only able to find calculators online and not a method to solve it.

    Read the article

  • Setting a Static IP Running FreeBSD8 in VirtualBox hosted on Windows 7

    - by gvkv
    I'm using VirtualBox on Windows 7 (host) to run a FreeBSD (guest) based web server. I`ve assigned a static ip of 192.168.80. 1 to the (virtualized) NIC which is run in bridged mode. The problem is that when I ping an external server (such as google.com) I get a No route to host error: dimetro# ping google.com PING google.com (66.249.90.104): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: No route to host ... I can ping the BSD server from both another virtualized machine and my host machine and from the server, I can ping everything on the network. The router ip is 192.168.1.1/16. ADDENDUM: I have the following lines in /etc/rc.conf on the BSD VM to configure networking: defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.80.1 netmask 255.255.0.0"

    Read the article

  • Relaying requests between third party server and Heroku for static IP

    - by Gady
    I have a rails application hosted on Heroku that I need to integrate with 3rd party payments provider. The payment provider requires that my application will have a static IP for incoming and outgoing HTTPS requests. I want to deploy a proxy on a Linode VPS so it can relay the information as a proxy. Relaying the request to the service provider seems easy, I just use their IP. Can I relay requests coming from the service provider to the heroku application? Can I realy the request using a URL (https://myapp.herokuapp.com) ? What is the recommended proxy server to use?

    Read the article

  • Email Tracking - By IP

    - by disasm
    I am trying to track an Email I received to see where it originated from (harmful scam Email). Here is the full header: Received-SPF: pass (domain of aol.com designates 205.188.109.203 as permitted sender) ZSwgeW91ciBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBoYXMgYmVlbiBhY2NlcHRlZCBhbmQgYXBw cm92ZWQgYnkgb3VyIFJlY3J1aXRpbmcgRGVwYXJ0bWVudC4gWU9VUiBGSVJT VCBBU1NJR05NRU5UIERFVEFJTFMuIFdlc3Rlcm4gVW5pb24gTW9uZXkgVHJh bnNmZXIgaGFkIHJlcG9ydHMgYWJvdXQgbGFwc2VzIGluIHRoZSBzZXJ2aWNl cyBvZiBzb21lIG9mIHRoZWlyIG91dGxldHMgYW5kIHNvbWUgbwEwAQEBAQN0 ZXh0L3BsYWluAwMwAgN0ZXh0L2h0bWwDAzIx X-YMailISG: HeDj35sWLDvNbQaO2B72kIm7hhiubE2qUysyBFo2m3GE4wsk FOs6uaYWwBVUBbL_ubGEs5Gitm1b86QFPuQYdS3g5s2f_uY3dyHhXh7DcBIB Ad4mJBzeRozs5.0s6vbqhsIEYlaKI4EDrsocJEbDbTUiUq2UyxZ7Ery8Iqow _sBVN0msHJvcI09KwmaXUteV_qCL7qFlj7WNSmdMM.wVUm3pyiWzw1VUZlyD nwoEzdEImQdwmJqoTM1YE8XU6BE8IkmUkh1Z8XkfLtHqmAsPi1_.Msbi8ubk QD71BcTABjb7ixELg5NfomsyZKVN.9G.TnuISlX5umByjS701ITyQ2PUYXai hoVCWg37bKWNR9MAWdogUK8PIV3MWPv5gdglNAKuPdS5Z7.01J39UGyH7R60 aIiIWdAsQ7_3VQBgIi9Seg2YM2j1U5g9QtdcJxBe0.1oigmj7G2sC9.YXNGX 3abQ1EcWVlJLuSuBbQ4Flpbe_Y3_ssz8nZIK2YjKy0U8WWe77vfnxdEBsknf w2OA_PAzHtuAAuxETnAOU_MeMIssgRAtihKC_26Au1LnKYCGPGADFBLaLNHF 30itI.kBvUjdvUfqV11dnGe50kFVzBGDMJFm8mXvb5WtIKq6qU1ZZmUroCew EgXjVZ.JKbux2KQmHh2zZbIJO3nOmLGkzuRczYiWCUNBDtmUZE6imuIQ4P6S RjusSbMITf2fIL_xe.qFCnW563sOdc4u.uXLDx.lq30740l8lWkkLX6KaDMF k9TY0VQKsMynqa4vXKpkTVNdukAcGd0p2i3newxY4q_9eZLn9czsJimfpKNW SX1bqjs0iCQHb4FTydf1Zpa2b.6lIhdjVlIM8tiWhfGhlUeM267T3njEM6nz 0vxyjparR_G_s0VnIVhSeLw2F5KpAL226w2yA.WBcqoG2ROSa7fK.0ZYwy36 Qcmk8C.HKj8Fng1qFLtEfaI4F66rCEJi7h1d6EK0Jk4a_TJnBBub1VQVoU.s SJ2ehs8aDjDqJw27_Ia4vYekKhIU8Oak0vYSmMXhZ5IvJfGfOHYVy4ebkoQf IDE3lSfex1nHZqcMqq0agPOZUOdznSIGJVx4T8m6MGwrEouvL.grhT6KUJQ5 g8UX6DVTgj.8lHuTyOzj3A3NRwDFs2JqicprOMJRS4UWYX8eQ1y4j.4ora36 LnWYm7k1n6X0lDBW5ZdZlsLy7.0al0G1uCIAZwBNo7FnHr6q2mQNwgFaPkNO FOiykqFHu0khLO_cZw87MpDslZO_3lFbJGlnchSs81hkESSQsldUxqdNkIV. yWsS58p1uuwVNksp4NB.QW41wfBtY5FU.Q80g8KiOZIz0daou3GlzoahcHoQ GPgSa86GKtSo.ew2xEUKk6c.ffAT9RjqNh5fzyhBdzEYURxJBYgMlL5DQp2G yYIGhlIS5h9JzPFVkk2XhBoY2NgEAAfJfAfqKoMNNKIW.bEwbgNa9xtSzHNg YdmDfOSkYkAGZDqwa.uONguq5.jqtnWDnx3GDyuoVg-- X-Originating-IP: [205.188.109.203] Authentication-Results: mta1343.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=aol.com; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=mx.aol.com; dkim=pass (ok) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (EHLO omr-d06.mx.aol.com) (205.188.109.203) by mta1343.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 10:11:15 -0700 Received: from mtaomg-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.141]) by omr-d06.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id ACFAD7012DFB4 for <.confidential.; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:11:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-mfb002c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mfb002.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.47.199]) by mtaomg-da05.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 2ADB6E000089 for <.confidential.; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:11:15 -0400 (EDT) References: <[email protected] <[email protected] <[email protected] To: .confidential. Subject:.confidential. In-Reply-To: <[email protected] X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: .confidential. X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D09A3C2FD3105D_1338_33A66_webmail-d257.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 38109-STANDARD Received: from 66.199.226.81 by webmail-d257.sysops.aol.com (205.188.17.42) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:11:15 -0400 Message-Id: <[email protected] X-Originating-IP: [66.199.226.81] Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:11:15 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1382116275; bh=9TXLF90L8beaMnjNzoKDwcv3Eq06jiZGN40YTBw2YOI=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xHVjoH5AccrOpPZoZZW+b41uJ7nzHDrryGsO6WzvtBOFGWX3xJMO3RB1ILFlJAsF6 P9olk8Gz6LDydX9SOZ4w/yPI8y8eU6z1AauwOPxw9F1lu82goIGwK3jIcvOv72koB5 Izq9By7L6PESEmmJ5nFc4ko9vH2CBMcJKPV95HTg= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338d52616bb37d53 Content-Length: 26445 The Email was from the aol domain, so I understand the IP of aol. My question is, looking at 66.199.226.81 , would it be safe to say that the Email originated from "Access Integrated Technologies"? Thanks for any help!

    Read the article

  • Force local IP traffic to an external interface

    - by calandoa
    I have a machine with several interfaces that I can configure as I want, for instance: eth1: 192.168.1.1 eth2: 192.168.2.2 I would like to be able to forward all the traffic to one of these local address trhough the other interface. For instance, all requests to an iperf, ftp, http server at 192.168.1.1 are not just routed internally, but forwarded through eth2 (and the external network will take care of re-routing the packet to eth1). I tried and looked at several commands, like iptables, ip route, etc... but nothing worked. The closest behavior I could get was done with: ip route change to 192.168.1.1/24 dev eth2 which send all 192.168.1.x on eth2, except for 192.168.1.1 which is still routed internally. The goal of this setup is to do interface driver testing without using two PCs. I am using Linux, but if you know how to do that with Windows, I'll buy it!

    Read the article

  • Force an LXC container to use its own IP address

    - by emma sculateur
    Sorry if this question has already been asked. I could not find it, I have this setup : +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |HOST | | | | +-------------------------------------------------+ | | | UBUNTU-VM | | | | | | | | +-------------------+ | | | | |UBUNTU-LXC | | +------------------+ | | | | 10.0.0.3/24 | 10.0.0.1/24 | |OTHER VM | | | | | eth0-----lxcbr0----------eth0-----------br0----------eth0 | | | | | | 192.168.100.2/24| 192.168.100.1/24 |192.168.100.3/24 | | | | +-------------------+ | +------------------+ | | +-------------------------------------------------+ | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ When I ping 192.168.100.3 from my UBUNTU-LXC, the source IP address is automatically changed to 192.168.100.2 by UBUNTU-VM. It's like having a NAT, whereas I really want my UBUNTU-LXC to talk with it own IP address. Is there any way to do this ? Edit : these info may be relevant : I am using KVM +libvirt to set up my VMs Here is how I create my interface in UBUNTU-VM : <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:cb:aa:74'/> <source bridge='br0'/> <model type='e1000'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x09' function='0x0'/> </interface>

    Read the article

  • Wireless connection switches off IP address

    - by Sanjay Gupta
    I have a Lenovo laptop with windows XP and a wireless connection at home. The wireless connection works when initially I switch on the computer. but if I leave it for even 5 minutes, the wireless is gone. Then I have to shut it off and start computer all over again, waiting for 5 minutes. Even if the wireless speed is 48Mbps or better, it gives the message "Renewing IP address" and gets stuck there not moving to the next stage. Other laptop in the household works fine and can be left on. Why does this happen ? I suspect that IP address is the problem and somehow is not registered in all the necessary files.

    Read the article

  • Accessing the physical IP address of a computer on my network that is no longer available

    - by floebs
    I'm trying to find out how to access the IP address of a computer (macbook pro) that I once had on my network at home. Does terminal store the 'connected' or 'linked' computer ID or IP of a networked computer anywhere that I can access after the laptop is no-longer within range? The laptop was part of my airport extreme network, its now out of range (stolen!), and I would like to know if its possible to discover the physical address of that laptop, even though I no-longer have physical access to the laptop. I have my airport extreme configured (somewhere??) to sniff out that laptop if it comes within range, and then connect to it. Where would this 'configured info' be stored on my desktop?

    Read the article

  • IP addresses not updating, but showing correctly in the DHCP Address Leases

    - by Bobby
    I first noticed this when I tried a RDP to wxp-38-shop and it connected me to the computer wxp-alvinm As you can see in the picture I pinged wxp-38-shop and it shows a different IP then whats given in the Address Leases page (w2k3 server). I tried to do ipconfig /flushdns on the server as well as the client computer, but it didn't update that way. If I do an ipconfig on wxp-38-shop is also shows 192.168.0.153, so why when I ping it from any other computer why would it be showing the wrong IP?

    Read the article

  • Setting a Static IP Running FreeBSD8 in VirtualBox hosted on Windows 7

    - by gvkv
    I'm using VirtualBox on Windows 7 (host) to run a FreeBSD (guest) based web server. I`ve assigned a static ip of 192.168.80. 1 to the (virtualized) NIC which is run in bridged mode. The problem is that when I ping an external server (such as google.com) I get a No route to host error: dimetro# ping google.com PING google.com (66.249.90.104): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: No route to host ... I can ping the BSD server from both another virtualized machine and my host machine and from the server, I can ping everything on the network. The router ip is 192.168.1.1/16. ADDENDUM: I have the following lines in /etc/rc.conf on the BSD VM to configure networking: defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" ifconfig_em0="inet 192.168.80.1 netmask 255.255.0.0"

    Read the article

  • Debugging an IP Camera

    - by Kevin Boyd
    Further to my previous question on ServerFault here, I finally can view the stream on RTSP however I still cannot view the camera stream in a web browser. The IP camera uses an activeX control in Internet Explorer. And although I can configure the camera settings from IE, I cannot view the stream it shows connecting for a few sec and shows disconnecting. I have forwarded the HTTP, RTSP and Stream ports of the IP camera. the public port is 7071 and private port is 7070. When I try to see the connections in TCPView it shows that the ActiveX control in IE is trying to connect to port 7070 which is quite unusual since it should connect to 7071 Also the state shows SYN_SENT for sometime and then disconnects. I have really no clue what's going on and why?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  | Next Page >