Search Results

Search found 2496 results on 100 pages for 'norheim se'.

Page 13/100 | < Previous Page | 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  | Next Page >

  • La version 2.2 de NeoAxis 3D est disponible le moteur de jeux vidéo en C# se voit doter d'un outil d'analyse de performance

    La version 2.2 de NeoAxis 3D est disponible Le moteur de jeux vidéo, multi-plateforme, en C# atteint la version 2.2. Même si c'est une mise à jour mineure, celle-ci apporte : Physique des personnages : refonte complète du code de la physique des personnages ;Physique des personnages : ajout du support de la position accroupie ;Ajout d'un outil d'analyse de performance dans l'éditeur de carte. L'outil fournit des informations détaillées sur les composants du moteur, l'utilisation des ressources...

    Read the article

  • Vers des Java Community Process plus ouvertes ? C'est ce qu'affirme Oracle, les développeurs sont se

    Vers des Java Community Process plus ouvertes ? C'est ce qu'affirme Oracle, les développeurs sont septiques Oracle innovera-t-il en ouvrant les spécifications Java ? C'est ce qu'avait promis le géant du logiciel. Une des manières d'y arriver serait de rendre plus démocratique le Java Community Process (JCP). Mais depuis, c'est le silence radio. Certes la société souligne qu'en tant que membre du JCP elle a pris part à plus de 80 Java Specification Requests, des propositions pour amender Java. Certes, Oracle continue de laisser entendre qu'il souhaite ouvrir les process de spécification pour satisfaire les participants actifs et soutenir...

    Read the article

  • Affaire Apple - Samsung : le Coréen se tourne vers Windows Phone 8 et modifiera ses modèles Android menacés d'interdiction de vente

    Le procès débuté aux États-Unis il y a bientôt un mois entre Apple et Samsung s'est terminé cette nuit. Dans cette guerre des brevets opposant les deux géants de la téléphonie, ce ne sont pas moins de 100 pages d'instructions qu'ont dû examiner les 9 jurés du tribunal fédéral de Californie. Samsung a été condamné à verser plus d'1 milliard (1 049 343 540) de dollars à Apple pour avoir violé une multitude de brevets. Le tribunal a par ailleurs jugé que certaines violations ont été réalisées volontairement et en toute connaissance de cause par Samsung. Cette décision concerne d'une part les brevets du design des appareils mais également des brevets logiciels comme le rebond au scroll, ou encore le zoom à deux doigts. Ce jugement ouvre donc la voie à Apple pour at...

    Read the article

  • Guava 13.0 disponible, cette version du framework Java se concentre sur les Collections et les utilitaires (Base)

    Après seulement quelques mois depuis la release 12, l'équipe Guava nous propose la treizième version de son framework Java. Au programme de Guava 13.0, on note pas mal de travail autour des Collections et les utilitaires (Base), dont voici les ajouts principaux :FluentIterable.toSortedImmutableList et transformAndConcat ; ContiguousSet.create(Range, DiscreteDomain) ; Maps.synchronizedNavigableMap ; Sets.synchronizedNavigableSet ; Ordering.allEqual ; Funnels.asOutputStream, integerFunnel et longFunnel ; DoubleMath.fuzzyCompare et fuzzyEquals ; UnsignedBytes.parseUnsignedByte, toString et MAX_VALUE ; UnsignedInts.decode ; UnsignedLongs.decode ; CycleDetectingLockFactory ;

    Read the article

  • Google aurait eu une attitude irresponsable avec Buzz qui révèlerait son mépris de la vie privée, se

    Mise à jour du 18/03/10 NB : Les commentaires sur cette mise à jour commencent ici dans le topic Google aurait eu une attitude irresponsable lors du lancement de Buzz Qui révèlerait son mépris de la vie privée, selon une officielle américaine de la FTC Google n'en finit pas de s'attirer les critiques depuis l'affaire Buzz. L'Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) avait ouvert les hostilités en déposant une plainte pour violation de la vie privée devant la Federal Trade Commission.

    Read the article

  • Twitter API 1.1 : à prendre ou à laisser, les développeurs tiers ont six mois pour se conformer aux nouvelles règles

    Twitter API 1.1 : plus de règles, moins de tweets Professionnalisation de l'écosystème ou volonté de monétisation ? [IMG]http://djug.developpez.com/rsc/twitter-money.jpg[/IMG] Twitter vient d'annoncer des changements anticipés à son API, dont l'intention affichée est de « fournir une expérience consistante de Twitter ». Mais pour certains, cette nouvelle mise à jour restreint encore davantage la manière dont les tweets des utilisateurs sont exploités en dehors du site des réseaux sociaux. Ce serait plutôt une préparation du terrain pour monétiser la croissance continue de Twitter. Cette nouvelle mise à jour de l'API prévoit trois changements. La première con...

    Read the article

  • PRISM : « United Stasi of America », pour un ancien haut-fonctionnaire les « donneurs d'alertes » sont les vrais patriotes et ils se multiplieront

    Le projet PRISM autorise les fédéraux américains à fouiller nos données stockées en ligne un ancien employé aux renseignements le dévoileSe basant sur des fuites d'un ancien employé au renseignement américain, l'éditorial américain Washington Post a révélé que l'agence de sécurité nationale américaine (NSA) et le FBI avaient accès aux bases de données de neuf poids lourds sur internet, parmi lesquels Facebook, Google ou même encore plus récemment Apple. Le projet, au nom de code PRISM, mis en place depuis 2007, permet aux deux agences de fouiller les données clients de ces entreprises sans aucune ordonnance préalable de la justice.

    Read the article

  • SEO Training - Easy Ways to Be a SE Optimizer?

    SEO is one of the most famous methods for web promotion and for this promotion cause, three usual SEO training methods are castigated in order to get desired trainers. Some of these courses are free but those do not give proper accurate training. It is better to spend some money for thorough training. SEO training guides a Search Engine Optimizer how to achieve benefits from Search engines.

    Read the article

  • Oracle Application Express 4.2 disponible en version finale, l'outil de développement pour Oracle Database se recentre sur le mobile

    Oracle Application Express, l'outil de développement rapide d'Oracle est désormais disponible en version 4.2. Cet outil, intégré à Oracle Database sans coût supplémentaire, permet de développer des applications Web exploitant les données d'une base Oracle. Cette mise à jour est très centrée vers le mobile et apporte un certain nombre de nouveautés pour le développement d'application mobile avec APEX. Notons en particulier :Le rendu des applications qui s'adapte pour proposer une interface adaptée au terminal mobile utilisé L'utilisation de jQuery Mobile qui permet la compatibilité sur la majorité des terminaux sans modification La possibilité de créer des graphiques en HTML5 pour les terminaux ne disposant pas de Flash L'utilisation ...

    Read the article

  • Dedicated hard disk for Informix SE dbname.dbs files & dedicated ramdisk for /tmp files.

    - by Frank Computer
    INFORMIX-SE 7.2: I would like to dedicate a hard disk, exclusively for my dbname.dbs directory which holds all the .dat and .idx files, and create a ramdisk for my /tmp temporary files in order to improve performance. I would also like to strip down the OS from any unecessary files and processes to minimize overhead for my dedicated application. Is this a good idea and are there any roadmaps for accomplishing this?

    Read the article

  • La nueva version de Enterprise Manager 12c, Release 4!

    - by grantunez-Oracle
    El día 3 de Junio del 2014 se anuncio la nueva versión de Enterprise Manager, y en esta versión hay nuevas funcionalidades que realmente hace que uno se apasione por este producto. Aquí no voy a platicar de todas las nuevas características, pero si de unas cuantas que son las de mas interés para la Base de Datos. Gestión Avanzada de Umbrales (Advanced Threshold Management) Esta funcionalidad  lo que permite es tener una mayor flexibilidad en los umbrales de todos tus objetivos (Targets) Umbrales basados en tiempo: Auto ajusta los umbrales estáticos, basados ??en los cambios de carga de trabajo de tu ambiente de trabajo. Por ejemplo, no son las mismas cargas de trabajo que tiene tu ambiente los fines de semana a comparación en un cierre de mes. Umbrales adaptativos: Umbrales que se calculan automáticamente para alertar si tu objetivo, ya sea una BD o un Exadata  se desvía del comportamiento esperado de su ambiente normal de trabajo. Interfaz para el seguimiento de tus tareas programadas Anteriormente si tenias varias tareas programadas, tenias que entrar a cada uno de tus targets para verificar como iba progresando, ahora en esta nueva versión, existe una nueva interfaz en la que te podrá permitir ver todas las tareas programadas que tienes en tu ambiente, reduciendo el numero de clicks para poder llegar a esta. De igual manera, se introduce la capacidad de poder exportar e importar tus tareas programadas a través de emcli emcli export_jobs  emcli import_jobs   Almacén de AWR (AWR Warehouse) En esta nueva versión se introdujo un almacén de los snapshots de AWR, este almacén o repositorio por default tiene una retención infinita, significando, que nunca va a borrar los snapshots de AWR.  Este repositorio puede ser una BD en  11.2.0.4 + el ultimo PSU o una version mas nueva. Las siguientes caracteristicas de AWR van a encontrarse en este repositorio Pagina de Performance Reporte AWR ASH Analytics Comparar un periodo de ADDM Comparar un un periodo de tiempo  In-Memory Store Central  Enterprise Manager 12.1.0.4 viene listo para la nueva version de la base de datos 12c, en donde vamos a poder ver un heat-map de los objetos que se encuentran en el "memory-store". Aquí, vamos a poder ver la compresión que se efectúa sobre los segmentos "en-memoria". De la misma manera vamos a tener un tutor o advisor, que nos va a poder guiar en nuestro proceso de decisión para ver que segmentos podemos definir en nuestra "in-memory store" . Mas Información Enterprise Manager  Enterprise Manager Cloud Control Documentation

    Read the article

  • JavaOne 2013: (Key) Notes of a conference – State of the Java platform and all the roadmaps by Amis

    - by JuergenKress
    Last week’s JavaOne conference provided insights in the roadmap of the Java platform as well as in the current state of things in the Java community. The close relationship between Oracle and IBM concerning Java, the (continuing) lack of such a relationship with Google, the support from Microsoft for Java applications on its Azure cloud and the vibrant developer community – with over 200 different Java User Groups in many countries of the world. There were no major surprises or stunning announcements. Java EE 7 (release in June) was celebrated, the progress of Java 8 SE explained as well as the progress on Java Embedded and ME. The availability of NetBeans 7.4 RC1 and JDK 8 Early Adopters release as well as the open sourcing of project Avatar probably were the only real news stories. The convergence of JavaFX and Java SE is almost complete; the upcoming alignment of Java SE Embedded and Java ME is the next big consolidation step that will lead to a unified platform where developers can use the same skills, development tools and APIs on EE, SE, SE Embedded and ME development. This means that anything that runs on ME will run on SE (Embedded) and EE – not necessarily the reverse because not all SE APIs are part of the compact profile or the ME environment. However, the trimming down of the SE libraries and the increased capabilities of devices mean that a pretty rich JVM runs on many devices – such as JavaFX 8 on the Raspberry PI. The major theme of the conference was Internet of Things. A world of things that are smart and connected, devices like sensors, cameras and equipment from cars, fridges and television sets to printers, security gates and kiosks that all run Java and are all capable of sending data over local network connections or directly over the internet. The number of devices that has these capabilities is rapidly growing. This means that the number of places where Java programs can help program the behavior of devices is growing too. It also means that the volume of data generated is expanding and that we have to find ways to harvest that data, possibly do a local pre-processing (filter, aggregate) and channel the data to back end systems. Terms typically used are edge devices (small, simple, publishing data), gateways (receiving data from many devices, collecting and consolidating, pre-processing, sending onwards to back end – typically using real time event processing) and enterprise services – receiving the data-turned-information from the gateways to further consolidate, distribute and act upon. A cheap device like the Raspberry PI is a perfect way to get started as a Java developer with what embedded (device) programming means and how interaction with physical input and output takes place. Roadmaps The over all progress on Java is visualized in this overview: Read the full article here. WebLogic Partner Community For regular information become a member in the WebLogic Partner Community please visit: http://www.oracle.com/partners/goto/wls-emea ( OPN account required). If you need support with your account please contact the Oracle Partner Business Center. Blog Twitter LinkedIn Mix Forum Wiki Technorati Tags: Amis,OOW,Oracle OpenWorld,JavaOne,WebLogic,WebLogic Community,Oracle,OPN,Jürgen Kress

    Read the article

  • ???????Java EE??????WebLogic Server 12c??????3???????Oracle WebLogic Server 12c Forum?????|WebLogic Channel|??????

    - by ???02
    ???????2012?2?7??Java EE??????????·???????Oracle WebLogic Server 12c?????????????????????1?25????????????Oracle WebLogic Server 12c Forum - ????????Java??????????? -????Java EE 6?Java SE 7???????Java???????WebLogic Server 12c?????????????????·?????????????????????3??????????????????????(???)?Java EE 6?Java SE 7??????200????????????WebLogic Server 12c ???????????Oracle Corporation?WebLogic Server???????Fusion Middleware?????????·??????????????·???????????·????????????????????·???????????/????????Oracle Fusion Middleware??????WebLogic Server?????????????????????? ?Fusion Middleware?????WebLogic Server?Coherence?Tuxedo??????????·??????????????????????????????????????????????Traffic Director?Virtual Assembly Builder???????Cloud Application Foundation??????????Cloud Application Foundation??Fusion Middleware?Fusion Application??????·???????????·????????????????????(?????) ?????????????1???????????WebLogic Server 12c??Java EE 6?Java SE 7???????Java?????????????????????????????????????200?????????????????? ???????????????????????Java EE 6??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????5?????? ????????·??????????????????Java EE 6?Java SE 7?????????????????????????????????????Oracle Real Application Clusters(RAC)????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????SPECjEnterprise2010????????????????????????????????????????????·????(Engineered Systems)?????????Oracle Exalogic Elastic Cloud???????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control 12c???????????????????????·?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????WebLogic Server????????GlassFish?????????????????JBoss?WebSphere?????????/???????????·?????WebLogic Server 12c????????????????????????????·???????????? ???????IDC?????????????WebLogic Server????????????????????????????????????????????????????????·???????????????????WebLogic Server 12c??????????????????·??????????????????????WebLogic Server 12c???????????????????????????(?????)¦????????????! ??????????????????WebLogic Server 12c??????WebLogic Server 12c??????3????? ???????????????????????Fusion Middleware???????????????????????????????WebLogic Server 12c??????3???????????????????????WebLogic Server 12c???????????????WebLogic Server 12c???????1――???Java????????????? ????WebLogic Server 12c???????????Java EE 6?Java SE 7????????????????????????????????Java EE??????????????????????????????????????Java EE????????????????????????????Java EE?????????????1??????????????????????????????????????????????????(???????·?????????????????)????????????????????????????????????????? ?Java EE 6????Java EE?????????1???????????Java?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????·??????(OSS)???????????????????????????????????????Java EE 6?Java SE 7??????Java???????????????????????????????????????????????????(???) ???????????????????????Fusion Middleware???????????????????????????????WebLogic Server 12c??????3???????????????????????WebLogic Server 12c???????????????WebLogic Server 12c???????1?????Java????????????? ????WebLogic Server 12c???????????Java EE 6?Java SE 7????????????????????????????????Java EE??????????????????????????????????????Java EE????????????????????????????Java EE?????????????1??????????????????????????????????????????????????(???????·?????????????????)????????????????????????????????????????? ?Java EE 6????Java EE?????????1???????????Java?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????·??????(OSS)???????????????????????????????????????Java EE 6?Java SE 7??????Java???????????????????????????????????????????????????(???)--WebLogic Server 12c???????2:??????????????????(??????????????????) ???WebLogic Server 12c?????2????????????????????????????????????1????????????????OSS??????????????????????????OSS????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????OSS?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? "???"???????????????? ???WebLogic Server 12c?????Java EE 6???JavaServer Faces 2.1?Java Servlet 3.0?EJB 3.1?Java Persistence API 2.0????????????Java EE??????????????????????????????????????????????OSS?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Java EE??????????????????????????????·???·?????????????/??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦?????WebLogic & Java EE??????????? ?????????????Java EE?????????????WebLogic Server 12c???????3:?????·??????????????? 3?????????????·?????????????????????????????????Oracle RAC????????????Active GridLink for RAC???????WebLogic Server????????1????????? Active GridLink for RAC ??WebLogic Server???????????WebLogic Suite???????1????WebLogic Server 12c???Web?????·???????????????????????????????HTTP?????????????Oracle RAC?1?????????????????????????·?????????????????????????????????????Oracle RAC??????????????????????Web?????·????????????????????3??1?????????????? ???Active GridLink for RAC??????????????????????????????????????????????TCP/IP??????????????????????????·??????????????????????????????????????????????????Oracle RAC????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????·????????????????????????????????????????????????¦????WebLogic?RAC????????????――Active GridLink for RAC????RAC???????????????????????????????????????4???? ????????·??????(GC)?????????????????????????????JRockit Real Time?????????????????????????????????????????????????JRockit Flight Recorder????2??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????·??????·????????????????????WebLogic Server?????????????12c?????????????? ?Oracle Database????????GC????????????????????????????????????????????·????????????????????WebLogic Server????????????????12c?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????·?????????????????????????????????????????????????WebLogic Server 12c???????????(???)¦??????????????????????????WebLogic Server????????·??????????――?????·??????·???????????WebLogic??????????????????????????TCO?――????????????????WebLogic??????? ???????????????????Cloud Application Foundation???????????WebLogic Server 12c???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????·??????·????????????????????????????????????????????????????????WebLogic Server 12c??????????????????????????¦WebLogic Server 12c??????·???Oracle Fusion Middleware 11g ??????·??????Oracle OpenWorld Tokyo 2012??????ENGINEERED FOR INNOVATION ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????WebLogic Server???????????????????????![???????????:4324]??:2012?4?4?(?)~6?(?)??:???? ????? ??????????????49????????????:????Oracle OpenWorld Tokyo 2012???? ~??????~(PDF)Oracle OpenWorld Tokyo 2012????????2?(?????)???

    Read the article

  • Java JRE 7 Certified with Oracle E-Business Suite

    - by Steven Chan (Oracle Development)
    Java Runtime Environment 7u10 (a.k.a. JRE 1.7.0_10 build 18) and later updates on the JRE 7 codeline are now certified with Oracle E-Business Suite Release 11i and 12 Windows-based desktop clients. What's needed to enable EBS environments for JRE 7? EBS customers should ensure that they are running JRE 7u10, at minimum, on Windows desktop clients. Of the compatibility issues identified with JRE 7, the most critical is an issue that prevents E-Business Suite Forms-based products from launching on Windows desktops that are running JRE 7.  Customers can prevent this issue -- and all other JRE 7 compatibility issues -- by ensuring that they have applied the latest certified patches documented for JRE 7 configurations to their EBS application tier servers.  These are summarized here for convenience. If the requirements change over time, please check the Notes for the authoritative list of patches: Apply Forms patch 14615390 to EBS 11i environments (Note 125767.1) Apply Forms patch 14614795 to EBS 12.0 and 12.1 environments (Note 437878.1) These patches are compatible with JRE 6 and 7, production ready, and fully-tested with the E-Business Suite.  These patches may be applied immediately to all E-Business Suite environments. All other Forms prerequisites documented in the Notes above should also be applied.  Where are the official patch requirements documented? All patches required for ensuring full compatibility of the E-Business Suite with JRE 7 are documented in these Notes: For EBS 11i: Deploying Sun JRE (Native Plug-in) for Windows Clients in Oracle E-Business Suite Release 11i (Note 290807.1) Upgrading Developer 6i with Oracle E-Business Suite 11i (Note 125767.1) For EBS 12 Deploying Sun JRE (Native Plug-in) for Windows Clients in Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 (Note 393931.1) Upgrading OracleAS 10g Forms and Reports in Oracle E-Business Suite Release 12 (Note 437878.1) Prerequisites for 32-bit and 64-bit JRE certifications JRE 1.70_10 32-bit + EBS 11.5.10.2 Windows XP SP3 Windows Vista SP1 and SP2 Windows 7 and Windows 7 SP1  Forms 6.0.8.28.x patch 14615390 (Note 125767.1) JRE 1.70_10 32-bit + EBS 12.0 & 12.1 Windows XP SP3 Windows Vista SP1 and SP2 Windows 7 and Windows 7 SP1 Forms 10g overlay patch 14614795 (Note 437878.1) SSL Users:  10.1.0.5 version of Patch 6370967 applied to AS 10.1.3 with OPatch. Note: This fix is already included in the April 2011 AS 10.1.3.5 CPU patch and later. JRE 1.7.0_10 64-bit + EBS 11.5.10.2 Windows 7 (64-bit) and Windows 7 SP1 (64-bit) Forms 6.0.8.28.x patch 14615390 (Note 125767.1) JRE 1.70_10 64-bit + EBS 12.0 & 12.1 Windows 7 (64-bit) and Windows 7 SP1 (64-bit) Forms 10g overlay patch 14614795 (Note 437878.1) SSL Users:  10.1.0.5 version of Patch 6370967 applied to AS 10.1.3 with OPatch. Note: This fix is already included in the April 2011 AS 10.1.3.5 CPU patch and later.  EBS + Discoverer 11g Users JRE 1.7.0_10 (7u10) is certified for Discoverer 11g in E-Business Suite environments with the following minimum requirements: Discoverer (11g) 11.1.1.6 plus Patch 13877486 and later  Reference: How To Find Oracle BI Discoverer 10g and 11g Certification Information (Document 233047.1) Worried about the 'mismanaged session cookie' issue? No need to worry -- it's fixed.  To recap: JRE releases 1.6.0_18 through 1.6.0_22 had issues with mismanaging session cookies that affected some users in some circumstances. The fix for those issues was first included in JRE 1.6.0_23. These fixes will carry forward and continue to be fixed in all future JRE releases on the JRE 6 and 7 codelines.  In other words, if you wish to avoid the mismanaged session cookie issue, you should apply any release after JRE 1.6.0_22 on the JRE 6 codeline, and JRE 7u10 and later JRE 7 codeline updates. All JRE 6 and 7 releases are certified with EBS upon release Our standard policy is that all E-Business Suite customers can apply all JRE updates to end-user desktops from JRE 1.6.0_03 and later updates on the 1.6 codeline, and from JRE 7u10 and later updates on the JRE 7 codeline.  We test all new JRE 1.6 and JRE 7 releases in parallel with the JRE development process, so all new JRE 1.6 and 7 releases are considered certified with the E-Business Suite on the same day that they're released by our Java team.  You do not need to wait for a certification announcement before applying new JRE 1.6 or JRE 7 releases to your EBS users' desktops. Implications of Java 6 End of Public Updates for EBS Users The Support Roadmap for Oracle Java is published here: Oracle Java SE Support Roadmap The latest updates to that page (as of Sept. 19, 2012) state (emphasis added): Java SE 6 End of Public Updates Notice After February 2013, Oracle will no longer post updates of Java SE 6 to its public download sites. Existing Java SE 6 downloads already posted as of February 2013 will remain accessible in the Java Archive on Oracle Technology Network. Developers and end-users are encouraged to update to more recent Java SE versions that remain available for public download. For enterprise customers, who need continued access to critical bug fixes and security fixes as well as general maintenance for Java SE 6 or older versions, long term support is available through Oracle Java SE Support . What does this mean for Oracle E-Business Suite users? EBS users fall under the category of "enterprise users" above.  Java is an integral part of the Oracle E-Business Suite technology stack, so EBS users will continue to receive Java SE 6 updates after February 2013. In other words, nothing will change for EBS users after February 2013.  EBS users will continue to receive critical bug fixes and security fixes as well as general maintenance for Java SE 6. These Java SE 6 updates will be made available to EBS users for the Extended Support periods documented in the Oracle Lifetime Support policy document for Oracle Applications (PDF): EBS 11i Extended Support ends November 2013 EBS 12.0 Extended Support ends January 2015 EBS 12.1 Extended Support ends December 2018 Will EBS users be forced to upgrade to JRE 7 for Windows desktop clients? No. This upgrade is highly recommended but currently remains optional. JRE 6 will be available to Windows users to run with EBS for the duration of your respective EBS Extended Support period.  Updates will be delivered via My Oracle Support, where you can continue to receive critical bug fixes and security fixes as well as general maintenance for JRE 6 desktop clients.  Coexistence of JRE 6 and JRE 7 on Windows desktops The upgrade to JRE 7 is highly recommended for EBS users, but some users may need to run both JRE 6 and 7 on their Windows desktops for reasons unrelated to the E-Business Suite. Most EBS configurations with IE and Firefox use non-static versioning by default. JRE 7 will be invoked instead of JRE 6 if both are installed on a Windows desktop. For more details, see "Appendix B: Static vs. Non-static Versioning and Set Up Options" in Notes 290801.1 and 393931.1. Applying Updates to JRE 6 and JRE 7 to Windows desktops Auto-update will keep JRE 7 up-to-date for Windows users with JRE 7 installed. Auto-update will only keep JRE 7 up-to-date for Windows users with both JRE 6 and 7 installed.  JRE 6 users are strongly encouraged to apply the latest Critical Patch Updates as soon as possible after each release. The Jave SE CPUs will be available via My Oracle Support.  EBS users can find more information about JRE 6 and 7 updates here: Information Center: Installation & Configuration for Oracle Java SE (Note 1412103.2) The dates for future Java SE CPUs can be found on the Critical Patch Updates, Security Alerts and Third Party Bulletin.  An RSS feed is available on that site for those who would like to be kept up-to-date. What will Mac users need? Oracle will provide updates to JRE 7 for Mac OS X users. EBS users running Macs will need to upgrade to JRE 7 to receive JRE updates. The certification of Oracle E-Business Suite with JRE 7 for Mac-based desktop clients accessing EBS Forms-based content is underway. Mac users waiting for that certification may find this article useful: How to Reenable Apple Java 6 Plug-in for Mac EBS Users Will EBS users be forced to upgrade to JDK 7 for EBS application tier servers? No. This upgrade will be highly recommended but will be optional for EBS application tier servers running on Windows, Linux, and Solaris.  You can choose to remain on JDK 6 for the duration of your respective EBS Extended Support period.  If you remain on JDK 6, you will continue to receive critical bug fixes and security fixes as well as general maintenance for JDK 6. The certification of Oracle E-Business Suite with JDK 7 for EBS application tier servers on Windows, Linux, and Solaris as well as other platforms such as IBM AIX and HP-UX is planned.  Customers running platforms other than Windows, Linux, and Solaris should refer to their Java vendors's sites for more information about their support policies. References Recommended Browsers for Oracle Applications 11i (Metalink Note 285218.1) Upgrading Sun JRE (Native Plug-in) with Oracle Applications 11i for Windows Clients (Metalink Note 290807.1) Recommended Browsers for Oracle Applications 12 (MetaLink Note 389422.1) Upgrading JRE Plugin with Oracle Applications R12 (MetaLink Note 393931.1) Related Articles Mismanaged Session Cookie Issue Fixed for EBS in JRE 1.6.0_23 Roundup: Oracle JInitiator 1.3 Desupported for EBS Customers in July 2009

    Read the article

  • Oracle University Partner Enablement Update (19th March)

    - by swalker
    Java SE 7 Certification News The following exam has recently gone into Production: Exam Title and Code Certification Track Upgrade to Java SE 7 Programmer (1Z0-805) Oracle Certified Professional, Java SE 7 Programmer Full preparation details are available on the exam page, including prerequisites for this certification, exam topics and pricing. Exams can be taken at an Oracle Test Center near you or at any Pearson VUE Testing Center. The following exam has recently become available for beta testing: Exam Code and Title Certification Track Java SE 7 Programmer II (1Z1-804) Oracle Certified Professional, Java SE 7 Programmer Full preparation details are available on the exam page, including prerequisites for this certification, exam topics and pricing. A beta exam offers you two distinct advantages: you will be one of the first to get certified you pay a lower price. Beta exams can be taken at any Pearson VUE Testing Center. Stay Connected to Oracle University: LinkedIn OracleMix Twitter Facebook

    Read the article

  • ???Java (CPU 2013?6??)??????????????

    - by OTN-J Master
    6?18??Java SE???????????·??????(CPU)2013?6?????????????????Java????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Java?????????????????????????????? ?????? (JDK/Server JRE/JRE) Java SE 7 Update 25??????????????? (JRE)Java Version 7 Update 25?????????????The Oracle Software Security Assurance Blog? ???????????????Java SE Critical Patch Update - June 2013????????? ?????Java SE Critical Patch Update - June 2013????????????Critical Patch Update??????????????????40?????????37??????????????????????????????????Critical Patch Update??????????34?????????????????????????????????????????CVSS???????????10.0?????Critical Patch Update??????4??????????????????????????????????????????????????????CVSS???????7.5??????Critical Patch Update????????????1??Java????????????????????????????????????????????Critical Patch Update??????????1???Javadoc????????????????????????????Javadoc???1.5???????????????????HTML?????????·??????????????????????????????????(CVE-2013-1571???CERT/CC VU#225657)??Javadoc?????Web???????????HTML?????????????????????????????????????????????????????Web???????????????????????????????Web?????????????????????????Web???????????????????????????CVSS???????4.3??????????Critical Patch Update??????Javadoc???????????????????????????????????????Java API Documentation Updater Tool?????????????????????????(??????)HTML??????????????????????????CERT/CC?Web???????????????Critical Patch Update??????????????????????????????????????????????????Critical Patch Update???????????????????????????????????????Java??????????????????????????????????????????????????Java Autoupdate???????Java.com????????????????????????????????????Java SE Critical Patch Update???????????????????????????????????????????Java??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Java Critical Patch Update - June 2013???????Javadoc?????????????

    Read the article

  • Rychlejší aplikace i bez zmen dotazu - 1.díl - vliv castých Commitu

    - by david.krch
    Pamatuji si, jak jsem pred pár lety sedel na konferenci Oracle Develop a sledoval svého ponekud známejšího kolegu Marka Townsenda ukazovat prostinké demo - jak se jedna a tatáž operace dá udelat bud velmi pomalu a nebo velmi rychle. Nešlo o klasické ladení SQL, ale efektivní volání techto dotazu. Jednotlivé techniky samy o sobe jsou pritom asi všem známé. Ohromilo mne ale hlavne to, jak velký rozdíl ve výkonu stejné operace provádené stejným jednoduchým SQL dotazem muže být. Ríkám si, že kdyby ten rozdíl videlo více lidí, možná by se casteji donutili napsat o ten jeden, dva rádky kódu více, aby byl kód treba i o rád efektivnejší a rychlejší. Pokusil jsem se udelat podobný príklad a na jeho základne vznikla trojice clánku, které postupne vycházely na server Databázový svet.Z nejakého duvodu se ale poslední díl nikdy nedockal publikace. Protože jsem od té doby párkrát narazil na potrebu odkázat nekoho na celou trojici clánku, rozhodl jsem se je re-publikovat na tomto blogu. Problém a rešení budu ukazovat v Jave, ale ve skutecnosti jde o postupy, které jsou platné at už voláte databázi odkudkoliv. Úkol je jednoduchý - vložit 100.000 záznamu do jednoduché tabulky. A postupne si ukážeme že ze základního nejpomalejšího rešení se nekolika jednoduchými kroky dostaneme na rešení, které bude 80x rychlejší.

    Read the article

  • Who practices, or is likely to practice, the IEEE Software Engineering? [closed]

    - by user72757
    There is an interesting issue in Software Engineering which I'd like to explore. The issue is firstly what is and what is not software engineering. Secondly, if software engineering is what the IEEE defines it to be, what are good examples of companies which practice the SE? Detailed question: Software engineering (SE) is the application of a systematic, disciplined, quantifiable approach to the design, development, operation, and maintenance of software, and the study of these approaches; that is, the application of engineering to software. [updated definition, originating in 610.12-1990 - IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology] If we consider as SE only those approaches that 100% match the above definition, we naturally get to SWEBOK (Software Engineering Body of Knowledge) which is created by the IEEE and the ACM. I'm seeking the answer to this: How can I find a company outside the defence industry which practices the SE as defined by IEEE? Clues: SE originates in 1968 NATO conference. The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) is based in the US at Carnegie Mellon University. Funding of the SEI is largely done by the US DoD. Defence industry uses the SE and sometimes has a partnership with the IEEE (as in case of Boeing). Possible decomposition of my big question into smaller chunks: a) Where is anyone who acknowledges the IEEE Software Engineering standards at work and perhaps even uses some of them? http://cs.hbg.psu.edu/cmpsc487/IEEEStds_List.htm b) Where can I find a person or a company building around SWEBOK? http://www.computer.org/portal/web/swebok/html/contents c) What is an example of a company professionally using CSDP (apart from those at IEEE website)? Does anyone have any possible contribution to this question?

    Read the article

  • Hablamos de Formación en la Conferencia Total Training en Lisboa

    - by Julio Rodriguez
    El pasado 22 de Octubre se celebro en Lisboa la 2ª Edición del Total Training Conference, la feria de la formación en la empresa de Portugal. Este año contó con la participación de cerca de 90 profesionales de los Recursos Humanos y se trataron los temas de mayor interés para los departamentos de formación de las empresas. ¿De qué se habló en la conferencia? Los ejes principales de las ponencias estuvieron centrados en la combinación de formación presencial y elearning, para sacar el máximo provecho de los presupuestos de formación y utilizar el medio adecuado para impactar de la manera más efectiva en los alumnos, ya estemos tratando de inculcar valores o comportamientos o simplemente transmitiendo una serie de conocimientos que tienen que ser utilizados en el día a día. Tambien se trato de los aspectos de aprendizajes informales, también conocidos como social learning, o cómo podemos transformar a nuestros empleados en profesores de sus compañeros resolviendo necesidades puntuales, pero a veces críticas. En la última ponencia se explicó y trató el novedoso tema de la gamificación o cómo introducir en la generación de contenidos formativos elementos lúdicos del juego para aumentar la efectividad de los mismos, concretando las definiciones y aclarando que formación no es una gamificación aunque por su similitud pueda confundirse. ¿Qué aportó Oracle a esta jornada? Desde Oracle quisimos aportar nuestro granito de arena, explicando los beneficios de una solución de formación en la nube, dónde, desde el punto de vista de funcionalidad no se renuncia a nada que pueda ofrecer una solución onpremise, con una serie de ventajas adicionales, como son: Pagar por uso y no hay que hacer desembolsos iniciales importantes como el pago de licencias o la compra de servidores o la contratación o asignación de personal informático para mantener un sistema en la casa. Así mismo al ser mantenida por el propio fabricante, el sistema es actualizado de forma constante, de forma transparente para el propio cliente sin los quebraderos de cabeza típicos de esos proyectos de implantación. Aprovechamos la ocasión para comentar algunos de los proyectos transformacionales de algunos de nuestros clientes para ilustrar como un sistema de formación puede por ejemplo convertir a un departamento que es un centro de coste en un centro de beneficio, o cómo un despliegue adecuado de la formación puede reducir la rotación, aumentar la satisfacción de los empleados y ayudar en el despliegue de nuevos productos. En definitiva una jornada de lo más provechosa si eres un profesional de la formación en Portugal Si quieres conocer las soluciones de elearning de Oracle las encontrarás aquí

    Read the article

  • Oracle University Partner Enablement-Update (November)

    - by swalker
    Zwei neue Bootcamps nur für OPN verfügbar Ab sofort stehen folgende Bootcamps nur für OPN zur Verfügung: 3-tägiges Oracle Exadata 11g technisches Bootcamp: Bereitet Sie darauf vor, Oracle Exadata 11g Certified Implementation Specialist zu werden. Termine derzeit geplant für Deutschland, Großbritannien Termine in allen Ländern möglich Termine für Live Virtual Class Schulung: 15.-17. Februar 2012 & 16.-18. Mai 2012 5-tägiges Oracle BI Enterprise Edition 11g Implementation Bootcamp Termine derzeit geplant für Schweden Termine in allen Ländern möglich Alle Termine für Bootcamps nur für OPN anzeigen Neuigkeiten zur Zertifizierung: Java SE 7 Gehören Sie zu den Ersten, die eine Java SE 7-Zertifizierung erhalten. Für Beta-Tests stehen folgende Prüfungen zur Verfügung: Nummer und Name der Prüfung Zertifizierung 1Z1-805 Upgrade to Java SE 7 Programmer (Beta bis 17. Dezember 2011) Oracle Certified Professional, Java SE 7 Programmierer 1Z1-803 Java SE 7 Programmer I (Beta bis 17. Dezember 2011) Oracle Certified Associate, Java SE 7 Programmierer Die Beta-Prüfungen bietet Ihnen zwei entscheidende Vorteile: Sie gehören Sie zu den Ersten, die eine Zertifizierung erhalten. Sie haben einen Preisvorteil. Die Beta-Prüfungen können in jedem Pearson VUE Testcenter absolviert werden. Oracle University Oracle University-Nachrichten in diesem Monat: Neue Kurse - Klicken Sie hier, um ausführlichere Informationen und weiterführende Links zu diesen Themen zu erhalten. Möchten Sie vom Know-how der Oracle University-Experten profitieren? Informieren Sie sich mithilfe der folgenden Oracle University-Newsletter: Technologie-Newsletter Applications-Newsletter Bleiben Sie in Verbindung mit Oracle University: OracleMix Twitter LinkedIn Facebook

    Read the article

  • Oracle University Partner Enablement Update (15th November)

    - by swalker
    Two new OPN Only Boot Camps available The following OPN Only Boot Camps have just become available: 3-day Oracle Exadata 11g Technical Boot Camp: Prepares you for becoming an Oracle Exadata 11g Certified Implementation Specialist Currently scheduled in Germany, UK Available for scheduling in all countries Live Virtual Class dates: 15-17 Feb 12 & 16-18 May 12 5-day Oracle BI Enterprise Edition 11g Implementation Boot Camp Currently scheduled in Sweden Available for scheduling in all countries View the complete OPN Only Boot Camp schedule. Certification News: Java SE 7 Be one of the first to get Java SE 7 certified. The following exams have recently become available for beta testing: Exam Code and Title Certification Track 1Z1-805 Upgrade to Java SE 7 Programmer (Beta until 17-Dec-11 ) Oracle Certified Professional, Java SE 7 Programmer 1Z1-803 Java SE 7 Programmer I (Beta until 17-Dec-11 ) Oracle Certified Associate, Java SE 7 Programmer A beta exam offers you two distinct advantages: you will be one of the first to get certified you pay a lower price. Beta exams can be taken at any Pearson VUE Testing Center. New CoursesOracle University released several new courses recently. Please click here to find out more about the new course titles. Are you looking for insight from the Oracle University experts? Check out these Oracle University Newsletters: Technology Newsletters Applications Newsletters Stay Connected to Oracle University: LinkedIn OracleMix Twitter Facebook

    Read the article

  • Project Jigsaw: Late for the train: The Q&A

    - by Mark Reinhold
    I recently proposed, to the Java community in general and to the SE 8 (JSR 337) Expert Group in particular, to defer Project Jigsaw from Java 8 to Java 9. I also proposed to aim explicitly for a regular two-year release cycle going forward. Herewith a summary of the key questions I’ve seen in reaction to these proposals, along with answers. Making the decision Q Has the Java SE 8 Expert Group decided whether to defer the addition of a module system and the modularization of the Platform to Java SE 9? A No, it has not yet decided. Q By when do you expect the EG to make this decision? A In the next month or so. Q How can I make sure my voice is heard? A The EG will consider all relevant input from the wider community. If you have a prominent blog, column, or other communication channel then there’s a good chance that we’ve already seen your opinion. If not, you’re welcome to send it to the Java SE 8 Comments List, which is the EG’s official feedback channel. Q What’s the overall tone of the feedback you’ve received? A The feedback has been about evenly divided as to whether Java 8 should be delayed for Jigsaw, Jigsaw should be deferred to Java 9, or some other, usually less-realistic, option should be taken. Project Jigsaw Q Why is Project Jigsaw taking so long? A Project Jigsaw started at Sun, way back in August 2008. Like many efforts during the final years of Sun, it was not well staffed. Jigsaw initially ran on a shoestring, with just a handful of mostly part-time engineers, so progress was slow. During the integration of Sun into Oracle all work on Jigsaw was halted for a time, but it was eventually resumed after a thorough consideration of the alternatives. Project Jigsaw was really only fully staffed about a year ago, around the time that Java 7 shipped. We’ve added a few more engineers to the team since then, but that can’t make up for the inadequate initial staffing and the time lost during the transition. Q So it’s really just a matter of staffing limitations and corporate-integration distractions? A Aside from these difficulties, the other main factor in the duration of the project is the sheer technical difficulty of modularizing the JDK. Q Why is modularizing the JDK so hard? A There are two main reasons. The first is that the JDK code base is deeply interconnected at both the API and the implementation levels, having been built over many years primarily in the style of a monolithic software system. We’ve spent considerable effort eliminating or at least simplifying as many API and implementation dependences as possible, so that both the Platform and its implementations can be presented as a coherent set of interdependent modules, but some particularly thorny cases remain. Q What’s the second reason? A We want to maintain as much compatibility with prior releases as possible, most especially for existing classpath-based applications but also, to the extent feasible, for applications composed of modules. Q Is modularizing the JDK even necessary? Can’t you just put it in one big module? A Modularizing the JDK, and more specifically modularizing the Java SE Platform, will enable standard yet flexible Java runtime configurations scaling from large servers down to small embedded devices. In the long term it will enable the convergence of Java SE with the higher-end Java ME Platforms. Q Is Project Jigsaw just about modularizing the JDK? A As originally conceived, Project Jigsaw was indeed focused primarily upon modularizing the JDK. The growing demand for a truly standard module system for the Java Platform, which could be used not just for the Platform itself but also for libraries and applications built on top of it, later motivated expanding the scope of the effort. Q As a developer, why should I care about Project Jigsaw? A The introduction of a modular Java Platform will, in the long term, fundamentally change the way that Java implementations, libraries, frameworks, tools, and applications are designed, built, and deployed. Q How much progress has Project Jigsaw made? A We’ve actually made a lot of progress. Much of the core functionality of the module system has been prototyped and works at both compile time and run time. We’ve extended the Java programming language with module declarations, worked out a structure for modular source trees and corresponding compiled-class trees, and implemented these features in javac. We’ve defined an efficient module-file format, extended the JVM to bootstrap a modular JRE, and designed and implemented a preliminary API. We’ve used the module system to make a good first cut at dividing the JDK and the Java SE API into a coherent set of modules. Among other things, we’re currently working to retrofit the java.util.ServiceLoader API to support modular services. Q I want to help! How can I get involved? A Check out the project page, read the draft requirements and design overview documents, download the latest prototype build, and play with it. You can tell us what you think, and follow the rest of our work in real time, on the jigsaw-dev list. The Java Platform Module System JSR Q What’s the relationship between Project Jigsaw and the eventual Java Platform Module System JSR? A At a high level, Project Jigsaw has two phases. In the first phase we’re exploring an approach to modularity that’s markedly different from that of existing Java modularity solutions. We’ve assumed that we can change the Java programming language, the virtual machine, and the APIs. Doing so enables a design which can strongly enforce module boundaries in all program phases, from compilation to deployment to execution. That, in turn, leads to better usability, diagnosability, security, and performance. The ultimate goal of the first phase is produce a working prototype which can inform the work of the Module-System JSR EG. Q What will happen in the second phase of Project Jigsaw? A The second phase will produce the reference implementation of the specification created by the Module-System JSR EG. The EG might ultimately choose an entirely different approach than the one we’re exploring now. If and when that happens then Project Jigsaw will change course as necessary, but either way I think that the end result will be better for having been informed by our current work. Maven & OSGi Q Why not just use Maven? A Maven is a software project management and comprehension tool. As such it can be seen as a kind of build-time module system but, by its nature, it does nothing to support modularity at run time. Q Why not just adopt OSGi? A OSGi is a rich dynamic component system which includes not just a module system but also a life-cycle model and a dynamic service registry. The latter two facilities are useful to some kinds of sophisticated applications, but I don’t think they’re of wide enough interest to be standardized as part of the Java SE Platform. Q Okay, then why not just adopt the module layer of OSGi? A The OSGi module layer is not operative at compile time; it only addresses modularity during packaging, deployment, and execution. As it stands, moreover, it’s useful for library and application modules but, since it’s built strictly on top of the Java SE Platform, it can’t be used to modularize the Platform itself. Q If Maven addresses modularity at build time, and the OSGi module layer addresses modularity during deployment and at run time, then why not just use the two together, as many developers already do? A The combination of Maven and OSGi is certainly very useful in practice today. These systems have, however, been built on top of the existing Java platform; they have not been able to change the platform itself. This means, among other things, that module boundaries are weakly enforced, if at all, which makes it difficult to diagnose configuration errors and impossible to run untrusted code securely. The prototype Jigsaw module system, by contrast, aims to define a platform-level solution which extends both the language and the JVM in order to enforce module boundaries strongly and uniformly in all program phases. Q If the EG chooses an approach like the one currently being taken in the Jigsaw prototype, will Maven and OSGi be made obsolete? A No, not at all! No matter what approach is taken, to ensure wide adoption it’s essential that the standard Java Platform Module System interact well with Maven. Applications that depend upon the sophisticated features of OSGi will no doubt continue to use OSGi, so it’s critical that implementations of OSGi be able to run on top of the Java module system and, if suitably modified, support OSGi bundles that depend upon Java modules. Ideas for how to do that are currently being explored in Project Penrose. Java 8 & Java 9 Q Without Jigsaw, won’t Java 8 be a pretty boring release? A No, far from it! It’s still slated to include the widely-anticipated Project Lambda (JSR 335), work on which has been going very well, along with the new Date/Time API (JSR 310), Type Annotations (JSR 308), and a set of smaller features already in progress. Q Won’t deferring Jigsaw to Java 9 delay the eventual convergence of the higher-end Java ME Platforms with Java SE? A It will slow that transition, but it will not stop it. To allow progress toward that convergence to be made with Java 8 I’ve suggested to the Java SE 8 EG that we consider specifying a small number of Profiles which would allow compact configurations of the SE Platform to be built and deployed. Q If Jigsaw is deferred to Java 9, would the Oracle engineers currently working on it be reassigned to other Java 8 features and then return to working on Jigsaw again after Java 8 ships? A No, these engineers would continue to work primarily on Jigsaw from now until Java 9 ships. Q Why not drop Lambda and finish Jigsaw instead? A Even if the engineers currently working on Lambda could instantly switch over to Jigsaw and immediately become productive—which of course they can’t—there are less than nine months remaining in the Java 8 schedule for work on major features. That’s just not enough time for the broad review, testing, and feedback which such a fundamental change to the Java Platform requires. Q Why not ship the module system in Java 8, and then modularize the platform in Java 9? A If we deliver a module system in one release but don’t use it to modularize the JDK until some later release then we run a big risk of getting something fundamentally wrong. If that happens then we’d have to fix it in the later release, and fixing fundamental design flaws after the fact almost always leads to a poor end result. Q Why not ship Jigsaw in an 8.5 release, less than two years after 8? Or why not just ship a new release every year, rather than every other year? A Many more developers work on the JDK today than a couple of years ago, both because Oracle has dramatically increased its own investment and because other organizations and individuals have joined the OpenJDK Community. Collectively we don’t, however, have the bandwidth required to ship and then provide long-term support for a big JDK release more frequently than about every other year. Q What’s the feedback been on the two-year release-cycle proposal? A For just about every comment that we should release more frequently, so that new features are available sooner, there’s been another asking for an even slower release cycle so that large teams of enterprise developers who ship mission-critical applications have a chance to migrate at a comfortable pace.

    Read the article

  • Dedicated hard disk for SE dbname.dbs files & dedicated ramdisk for /tmp files.

    - by Frank Computer
    INFORMIX-SE 7.2: I would like to dedicate a hard disk, exclusively for my dbname.dbs directory which holds all the .dat and .idx files, and create a ramdisk for my /tmp temporary files in order to improve performance. I would also like to strip down the OS from any unecessary files and processes to minimize overhead for my dedicated application. Is this a good idea and are there any roadmaps for accomplishing this?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  | Next Page >