Search Results

Search found 47799 results on 1912 pages for 'class attributes'.

Page 135/1912 | < Previous Page | 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142  | Next Page >

• CakePHP Form Helper - Show error class, but not error message

  - by Jeremy Penrod

  I'm attempting to customize the error output on the CakePHP 2.0 form helper. Currently, the form renders error messages below the input and applies an 'error' class to the input's label. I have found that I can either disable error reporting altogether for an input, or output the error class and message. I would like the error class to be applied to the label of the offending inputs WITHOUT any message below. How do you turn off the error message outputting for a form, BUT still apply error classes to offending labels?

  Read the article

• Casting complex class into a dataset?

  - by iTayb

  This is the class I'm trying to turn into a dataset: public class BookStore { private List<Book> booksList; } public class Book { private string name; private string imageurl; private string subject; private string author; private int level; private int year; private int rating; private List<string> booksellers; private List<decimal> bookprices; } There are proprieties, of course. How can I turn it into a dataset? Thank you very much.

  Read the article

• writing structs and classes to disk

  - by Phenom

  The following function writes a struct to a file. int btwrite(short rrn, BTPAGE *page_ptr) { long addr; addr = (long) rrn * (long) PAGESIZE + HEADERSIZE; lseek(btfd, addr, 0); return (write(btfd, page_ptr, PAGESIZE)); } The following is the struct. typedef struct { short keycount; /* number of keys in page */ int key[MAXKEYS]; /* the actual keys */ int value[MAXKEYS]; /* the actual values */ short child[MAXKEYS+1]; /* ptrs to rrns of descendants */ } BTPAGE; What would happen if I changed the struct to a class, would it still work the same? If I added class functions, would the size it takes up on disk increase?

  Read the article

• call method from main class, gives error

  - by user557039

  try to call method ss from class from it return me error, Blockquote Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException at teste1.exp.ss(exp.java:16) at teste1.Main.main(Main.java:64) Java Result: 1 Blockquote <pre> public class Main { public static void main(String[] arguments) { ................... private static String[] ff; exp mega = new exp(); mega.ss(ff); } class exp { public void ss (String gvanswer[]){ String answer[] = new String[3]; answer[0] = "pacific "; answer[1] = "everest"; answer[2] = "amazon "; if (gvnswer[0].equals("pacific")) {System.out.println("eeeeeeeeeeeeee ");} if (gvanswer[1].equals(answer[1])){System.out.println("l ");} }

  Read the article

• Constructors in Inner classes (implementing Interfaces)

  - by thepandaatemyface

  Hi, How would I go about writing a constructor for an inner class which is implementing an interface? I know I could make a whole new class, but I figure there's got to be a way to do something along the line of this: JButton b = new JButton(new AbstractAction() { public AbstractAction() { super("This is a button"); } public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) { System.out.println("button clicked"); } }); When I enter this it doesn't recognize the AbstractAction method as a constructor (compiler asks for return type). Anyone have an idea? Thanks

  Read the article

• Why isn't the new() generic constraint satisfied by a class with optional parameters in the construc

  - by Joshua Flanagan

  The following code fails to compile, producing a "Widget must be a non-abstract type with a public parameterless constructor" error. I would think that the compiler has all of the information it needs. Is this a bug? An oversight? Or is there some scenario where this would not be valid? public class Factory<T> where T : new() { public T Build() { return new T(); } } public class Widget { public Widget(string name = "foo") { Name = name; } public string Name { get; set; } } public class Program { public static void Main() { var widget = new Widget(); // this is valid var factory = new Factory<Widget>(); // compiler error } }

  Read the article

• C++ destructor issue with std::vector of class objects

  - by Nigel

  I am confused about how to use destructors when I have a std::vector of my class. So if I create a simple class as follows: class Test { private: int *big; public: Test () { big = new int[10000]; } ~Test () { delete [] big; } }; Then in my main function I do the following: Test tObj = Test(); vector<Test> tVec; tVec.push_back(tObj); I get a runtime crash in the destructor of Test when I go out of scope. Why is this and how can I safely free my memory?

  Read the article

• How to retrieve base class only (entity framework)?

  - by Juvaly

  Hi All, I've been scratching my head here for a while now... I have a Consumer class and a BillableConsumer class that inherits Consumer. They are both a part of the Consumers set. The problem is that this following query: Consumer consumer = (from c in _ctx.Consumers where c.ID = id select c).First(); returns a BillableConsumer instance! Just the same as this query: BillableConsumer bconsumer = (from c in _ctx.Consumers.OfType<BillableConsumer>() where c.ID = id select c).First(); How can I return an instance of just the base class? (these are separate tables in the data store).

  Read the article

• Pass variable number of variables to a class in PHP

  - by user325282

  I need to pass a variable number of strings to instantiate different classes. I can always do a switch on the size of the array: switch(count($a)) { case 1: new Class(${$a[0]}); break; case 2: new Class(${$a[0]}, ${$a[1]}); break; etc... There has to be a better way to do this. If I have an array of strings ("variable1", "variable2", 'variable3", ...), how can I instantiate a Class without manually accounting for every possibility?

  Read the article

• Java generics: actual class as a generic parameter.

  - by user554916

  What do I write instead of "TheClass" to make this work? Or is there an alternative way to do it (possibly without making WithName and WithAge generic)? class Item { NeigborList<TheClass> neighbors; } class WithName extends Item { // here I want neighbors to be a NeighborList<WithName> String name; void someMethod() { System.out.println(neighbors.nearestTo(this).name); } } class WithAge extends Item { // here I want neighbors to be a NeighborList<WithAge> int age; void someOtherMethod() { System.out.println(neighbors.nearestTo(this).age); } }

  Read the article

• How to set a value from another class

  - by Ram

  Its said that property should not be "Set" only and it should be "Get" as well. What should i do if I need to set value to a variable from some other class? The will keep changing so I cannot pass it through constructor. Shall I create a function for this as shown below? class A { public void SetValue() { b = new B(); b.SetTest(10); } } class B { int test; public void SetTest(int value) { test = value; } } What are the other alternatives?

  Read the article

• Rotation in a Vector2d class in Java

  - by wanstein

  I've been working on this for one hour, just can't get it. I have a Vector2d class: public class Vector2d { public double x = 0.0; public double y = 0.0; .... } This vector class has a rotate() method which is causing me trouble. The first snippet seems to make the x and y values smaller and smaller. The second one works just fine! Am I missing something simple here? public void rotate(double n) { this.x = (this.x * Math.cos(n)) - (this.y * Math.sin(n)); this.y = (this.x * Math.sin(n)) + (this.y * Math.cos(n)); } This works: public void rotate(double n) { rx = (this.x * Math.cos(n)) - (this.y * Math.sin(n)); ry = (this.x * Math.sin(n)) + (this.y * Math.cos(n)); x = rx; y = ry; } I just can't spot any difference there

  Read the article

• Abstract class get parameter from implementing subclass?

  - by soren.qvist

  I'm wondering if there is way to do this without breaking encapsulation, I want the abstract class to rely on parameters defined in the implementing subclass. Like so: public abstract class Parent { private int size; private List<String> someList; public Parent() { size = getSize(); someList = new ArrayList<String>(size); } public abstract int getSize(); } public class Child extends Parent { @Override public int getSize() { return 5; } } Is this ugly? Is there a better way? And perhaps more importantly, is this even a good idea?

  Read the article

• Getting Reference to Calling Activity from AsyncTask (NOT as an inner class)

  - by stormin986

  Is it at all possible, from within an AsyncTask that is NOT an inner class of the calling Activity class, to get a reference to the instance of Activity that initiated execution of the AsyncTask? I am aware of this thread, however it doesn't exactly address how to reference the calling Activity. Some suggest passing a reference to the Activity as a parameter to the AsyncTask constructor, however, it's reported that doing so will always result in a NullPointerException. So, I'm at a loss. My AsyncTask provides robust functionality, and I don't want to have to duplicate it as an inner class in every Activity that wants to use it. There must be an elegant solution.

  Read the article

• "Inconsistent accessibility" on class definition

  - by TWood

  I'm adding some bindable CLR properties to my ongoing WPF application in my App class and I can't compile because of this inconsistent accessibility error. Inconsistent Accessibility: Property type 'SomeProj.Error' is less accessible than property 'SomeProj.App.LatestError' To fix this error I had to change class Error to public class Error. In VB, classes were assumed public and most of the time omitted that access modifier. Is this not the case in C# as well? I only recently made the vb-c# jump and little nuances like this in the syntax slow me down.

  Read the article

• Apply a class to a <h1> based on the site url

  - by user1870639

  I'm new to PHP and want to apply a specific class to the title of my page depending on what part of the site the viewer is browsing. For instance, I want to apply the class "blog" to the if the viewer is at domain.com/blog OR domain.com/blog/post-1 so on and so forth BUT apply the class "pics" if they're viewing domain.com/pics or domain.com/pics/gallery-1 etc etc. I found something that could be modified to serve my needs using javascript here but I figured seeing as I'm using PHP already, it'd make more sense to keep this sort of thing server side. As I say, I'm new to PHP. I've experimented with some regular expressions, but to no avail.

  Read the article

• Reflection alternative for switch on enum in order to select namespace/class

  - by Am

  Hi, I have an interface named IHarvester. There are 3 implementations of that interface, each under their own namespace: Google Yahoo Bing A HarvesterManager uses the given harvester. It knows the interface and all 3 implementations. I want some way of letting the class user say in which harvester it wants to use. And in the code select that implementation, without a switch-case implementation. Can reflection save my day? Here is the code bits: // repeat for each harvester namespace Harvester.Google { public abstract class Fetcher : BaseHarvester, IInfoHarvester {...} } public enum HarvestingSource { Google, Yahoo, Bing, } class HarvesterManager { public HarvestingSource PreferedSource {get;set;} public HarvestSomthing() { switch (PreferedSource) .... // awful... } } Thanks. I will give my 2 cents of why I want to change this. There several people writing harvesters, I want them to focus only on building more harvesters, without ever needing to update the enum, or at worst, update only the enum.

  Read the article

• javascript : make a new safe class constructor

  - by guilin ??

  sometimes we loss the new keyword when define new object, obj = new Clazz(); //correct obj = Clazz(); //wrong, but no syntax error, hard to debug. I want to write a function to help me create Class and make it new safe. var Class = function(constructor){ //when constructor // if not call by new return new constructor(); // else constructor(); } var MyClazz = Class(function(name){ this.name = name }, SuperClazz1, SuperClass2 ) MyClazz.extend({ show: function(){console.log(this.name)} }) obj1 = new MyClazz(); obj2 = MyClazz(); // obj1 should same as obj2 Is it possible, any exists module?

  Read the article

• class T in c++ (your definition)

  - by JohnWong

  The one advantage of using class T in c++ is to reduce the time to redefine data types in a function, if those data types are defined in other function, for example, in int main. template <class T> void showabs(T number) { if (number < 0 ) number = -number; cout << number << endl; return 0; } int main() { int num1 = -4; float num2 = -4.23f; showabs(num1); showabs(num2); return 0; } So in this case, without class T, for each data type, we have to add its corresponding data-type condition, that is, another set of if statement for int, and another one for float. Am I correct?

  Read the article

• JQuery - Find the first identical class after a specific class.

  - by WEBProject

  Hi guys, lets say I have this divs: <div class="item current"><strong>Example 1</strong></div> <div class="item"><strong>Example 2</strong></div> Im have this code: var News = { init : function(){ $('#news-content') .find('.item:first-child') .addClass('current') .show('slide',{direction:"up"},500); $('#news-content') .find('.item:first-child') .addClass('current') .delay(1000) .hide('slide',{direction:"down"},500); this.show() }, show : function() { // ... } } $(document).ready(News.init) After the init - I want to catch the next "item" after "current" class and make the same operation as "init" on it. how can I do it with jquery?

  Read the article

• Differences in variable declarations in C++

  - by Sachin Chourasiya

  Class A { }; What is the difference between A a , A *a and A a = new A().

  Read the article

• Simple C++ classes question

  - by Without me Its just Aweso

  Its been a long time since i've done C++ and I'm running into some trouble with classes referencing eachother. right now I have something like: a.h class a { public: a(); bool skeletonfunc(b temp); } ==================== b.h class b { public: b(); bool skeletonfunc(a temp); } since each one needs a reference to the other i've found I cant do a #include of eachother at the top or i end up in a weird loop of sorts with the includes. So how can I make it so that a can use b and vice versa with out making a cyclical #include problem. thanks!

  Read the article

• Checking variable from a different class in C#

  - by Josh

  Greetings- I have 2 classes. One is called "Programs" and the other is called "Logs". The class called Programs has public const string m_sEnviron = ""; near the top and I need to check what the m_sEnviron variable is set to through my class called Logs. The variable m_sEnviron will get set from a scheduler called Tidal so how can I check its value from a different class. If this is not the best to do this then please let me know what the better ways are. Thanks in advance. Regards,

  Read the article

• How to set value from other class

  - by Ram

  Its said that property should not be "Set" only and it should be "Get" as well. What should i do if I need to set value to a variable from some other class? The will keep changing so I cannot pass it through constructor. Shall I create a function for this as shown below? class A { public void SetValue() { b = new B(); b.SetTest(10); } } class B { int test; public void SetTest(int value) { test = value; } } What are the other alternatives?

  Read the article

• Get size of jar file loaded by urlclassloader

  - by Aliya

  Does anybody know a good way to find the file size that is dynamically loaded by urlclassloader? I am using the urlclassloader in the following manner, but need to keep track of how much bandwidth is being used. URLClassLoader sysloader = (URLClassLoader) ClassLoader .getSystemClassLoader(); Class<URLClassLoader> sysclass = URLClassLoader.class; Method method = sysclass.getDeclaredMethod("addURL", parameters); method.setAccessible(true); method.invoke(sysloader, (Object[]) urls); Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142  | Next Page >