Search Results

Search found 13974 results on 559 pages for 'include'.

Page 136/559 | < Previous Page | 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143  | Next Page >

  • Best language to develop medical software

    - by Grace
    I need to write medical program to manage medical practices (patient records, appointments, prescription, etc). Note that this is not for US practices so US EMRs will not work. What is the best platform to develop the software in ie. language and database? Considerations include: - Integration with the web - will need to have Doctors download updates to the software from the web. Will also post reports from the software unto webpages - The software will include a mobile application - probably for Blackberry - Cost is a big factor - need to minimize the license cost to the users - Need tight security on the program

    Read the article

  • program crashes at CIN input | C++

    - by TimothyTech
    hello okay, so i made a DOS program however my game always crashes on my second time running to the cin function. #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <ctime> #include <cstdlib> using namespace std; //call functions int create_enemyHP (int a); int create_enemyAtk (int a); int find_Enemy(int a); int create_enemyDef (int a); // user information int userHP = 100; int userAtk = 10; int userDef = 5; string userName; //enemy Information int enemyHP; int enemyAtk; int enemyDef; string enemies[] = {"Raider", "Bandit", "Mugger"}; int sizeOfEnemies = sizeof(enemies) / sizeof(int); string currentEnemy; int chooseEnemy; // ACTIONS int journey; int test; int main() { // main menu cout << "welcome brave knight, what is your name? " ; cin >> userName; cout << "welcome " << userName << " to Darland" << endl; //TRAVELING MENU: cout << "where would you like to travel? " << endl; cout << endl << " 1.> Theives Pass " << endl; cout << " 2.> Humble Town " << endl; cout << " 3.> Mission HQ " << endl; cin >> journey; if (journey == 1) { // action variable; string c_action; cout << "beware your journey grows dangerous " << endl; //begins battle // Creating the enemy, HP ATK DEF AND TYPE. ; srand(time(0)); enemyHP = create_enemyHP(userHP); enemyAtk = create_enemyAtk(userAtk); enemyDef = create_enemyDef(userDef); chooseEnemy = find_Enemy(sizeOfEnemies); currentEnemy = enemies[chooseEnemy]; cout << " Here comes a " << currentEnemy << endl; cout << "stats: " << endl; cout << "HP :" << enemyHP << endl; cout << "Attack : " << enemyAtk << endl; cout << "Defense : " << enemyDef << endl; ACTIONS: cout << "Attack <A> | Defend <D> | Items <I>"; cin >> c_action; //if ATTACK/DEFEND/ITEMS choice if (c_action == "A" || c_action == "a"){ enemyHP = enemyHP - userAtk; cout << " you attack the enemy reducing his health to " << enemyHP << endl; userHP = userHP - enemyAtk; cout << "however he lashes back causing you to have " << userHP << "health left " << endl; //end of ATTACK ACTION } the last line "cin c_action crashes. i use two other pages. they just create the functions. is it a complier issue. also why does my complier always shutdown after it runs he app. is there a way to stop it?

    Read the article

  • Vector iterators in for loops, return statements, warning, c++

    - by Crystal
    Had 3 questions regarding a hw assignment for C++. The goal was to create a simple palindrome method. Here is my template for that: #ifndef PALINDROME_H #define PALINDROME_H #include <vector> #include <iostream> #include <cmath> template <class T> static bool palindrome(const std::vector<T> &input) { std::vector<T>::const_iterator it = input.begin(); std::vector<T>::const_reverse_iterator rit = input.rbegin(); for (int i = 0; i < input.size()/2; i++, it++, rit++) { if (!(*it == *rit)) { return false; } } return true; } template <class T> static void showVector(const std::vector<T> &input) { for (std::vector<T>::const_iterator it = input.begin(); it != input.end(); it++) { std::cout << *it << " "; } } #endif Regarding the above code, can you have more than one iterator declared in the first part of the for loop? I tried defining both the "it" and "rit" in the palindrome() method, and I kept on getting an error about needing a "," before rit. But when I cut and paste outside the for loop, no errors from the compiler. (I'm using VS 2008). Second question, I pretty much just brain farted on this one. But is the way I have my return statements in the palindrome() method ok? In my head, I think it works like, once the *it and *rit do not equal each other, then the function returns false, and the method exits at this point. Otherwise if it goes all the way through the for loop, then it returns true at the end. I totally brain farted on how return statements work in if blocks and I tried looking up a good example in my book and I couldn't find one. Finally, I get this warnings: \palindrome.h(14) : warning C4018: '<' : signed/unsigned mismatch Now is that because I run my for loop until (i < input.size()/2) and the compiler is telling me that input can be negative? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • C errors - Cannot combine with previous 'struct' declaration specifier && Redefinition of 'MyMIDINotifyProc' as different kind of symbol

    - by user1905634
    I'm still new to C but trying to understand it better by working my way through a small MIDI audio unit (in Xcode 4.3.3). I've been searching for an answer to this all day and still don't even understand exactly what the problem is. Here's the code in question: //MyMIDINotifyProc.h #ifndef MIDIInstrumentUnit_CallbackProcs_h #define MIDIInstrumentUnit_CallbackProcs_h void MyMIDINotifyProc (const MIDINotification *message, void *refCon); #endif //MyMIDINotifyProc.c #include <CoreMIDI/CoreMIDI.h> #include "MyMIDINotifyProc.h" void MyMIDINotifyProc (const MIDINotification *message, void *refCon) { //manage notification } In the header definition I get this: ! Cannot combine with previous 'struct' declaration specifier I've made sure the definitions match and tried renaming them and I still get this in my .c file: ! Redefinition of 'MyMIDINotifyProc' as different kind of symbol Which points to the .h definition as the 'Previous definition'. I know that MIDIServices.h in the CoreMIDI framework defines: typedef void (*MIDINotifyProc)(const MIDINotification *message, void *refCon); But I don't understand if/why that would cause an error. I would be grateful if anyone could offer some help.

    Read the article

  • sql query where parameters null not null

    - by Laziale
    I am trying to do a sql query and to build the where condition dynamically depending if the parameters are null or no. I have something like this: SELECT tblOrder.ProdOrder, tblOrder.Customer FROM tblOrder CASE WHEN @OrderId IS NOT NULL THEN WHERE tblOrder.OrderId = @OrderId ELSE END CASE WHEN @OrderCustomer IS NOT NULL THEN AND tblOrder.OrderCustomer = @OrderCustomer ELSE END END This doesn't work, but this is just a small prototype how to assemble the query, so if the orderid is not null include in the where clause, or if the ordercustomer is not null include in the where clause. But I see problem here, for example if the ordercustomer is not null but the orderid is null, there will be error because the where keyword is not included. Any advice how I can tackle this problem. Thanks in advance, Laziale

    Read the article

  • how can we generate the bit greater than 60000?

    - by thinthinyu
    we can now generate about 50000bits. my code cannot generate more than 60000 bit..please help me............m_B is member variable and type is CString. // LFSR_ECDlg.cpp : implementation file // #include "stdafx.h" #include "myecc.h" #include "LFSR_ECDlg.h" #include "MyClass.h" #ifdef _DEBUG #define new DEBUG_NEW #undef THIS_FILE static char THIS_FILE[] = __FILE__; #endif extern MyClass mycrv; ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // LFSR_ECDlg dialog LFSR_ECDlg::LFSR_ECDlg(CWnd* pParent /*=NULL*/) : CDialog(LFSR_ECDlg::IDD, pParent) { //{{AFX_DATA_INIT(LFSR_ECDlg) m_C1 = 0; m_C2 = 0; m_B = _T(""); m_p = _T(""); m_Qty = 0; m_time = _T(""); //}}AFX_DATA_INIT } void LFSR_ECDlg::DoDataExchange(CDataExchange* pDX) { CDialog::DoDataExchange(pDX); //{{AFX_DATA_MAP(LFSR_ECDlg) DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_C1, m_C1); DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_C2, m_C2); DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_Sequence, m_B); DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_Sequence2, m_p); DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_QTY, m_Qty); DDV_MinMaxLong(pDX, m_Qty, 0, 2147483647); DDX_Text(pDX, IDC_time, m_time); //}}AFX_DATA_MAP } BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(LFSR_ECDlg, CDialog) //{{AFX_MSG_MAP(LFSR_ECDlg) ON_WM_SETCURSOR() ON_EN_CHANGE(IDC_Sequence, OnGeneratorLFSR) ON_MESSAGE(WM_MYPAINTMESSAGE,PaintMyCaption)//by ttyu ON_BN_CLICKED(IDC_save, Onsave) //}}AFX_MSG_MAP END_MESSAGE_MAP() ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // LFSR_ECDlg message handlers bool LFSR_ECDlg::CheckDataEntry() { //if((m_Px>=mycrv.p)|(m_Py>=mycrv.p)) {AfxMessageBox("Seed [P] is invalid!");return false;}//by ttyu if((m_C1<=0) | (m_C1>mycrv.n)) {AfxMessageBox("Constant c1 is not valid!");return false;} if((m_C2<=0 )| (m_C2>mycrv.n)) {AfxMessageBox("Constant c2 is not valid!");return false;} return true; } void LFSR_ECDlg::OnOK() { UpdateData(true); static int stime,etime,dtime; CString txt; m_time=""; CTime t(CTime::GetCurrentTime()); CString txt1; txt1=""; //ms = t.GetDay(); // TODO: Add extra validation here stime=t.GetTime(); txt1.Format("%d",stime); AfxMessageBox (txt1); txt=""; if (CheckDataEntry()) OnGeneratorLFSR(); etime=t.GetTime(); CString txt2; txt2=""; txt2.Format("%d",etime); AfxMessageBox (txt2); dtime=etime-stime; txt.Format("%f",dtime); m_time+=txt; // UpdateData(false); //rtime.Format("%s, %s %d, %d.",day,month,dd,yy); //CDialog::OnOK(); } void LFSR_ECDlg::OnCancel() { // TODO: Add extra cleanup here CDialog::OnCancel(); } void LFSR_ECDlg::OnGeneratorLFSR() { // TODO: If this is a RICHEDIT control, the control will not // send this notification unless you override the CDialog::OnInitDialog() // function and call CRichEditCtrl().SetEventMask() // with the ENM_CHANGE flag ORed into the mask. // TODO: Add your control notification handler code here point P0,P1,P2; P0 = mycrv.G; P1 = mycrv.MulPoint(P0,2); int C1=m_C1, C2=m_C2, n=m_Qty, k=0; int q= (mycrv.p-1) / 2; m_p = ""; m_B = ""; CString txt; for(int i=0;i<n;i++) { txt=""; if(P0==mycrv.O) txt.Format("O"); else txt.Format("(%d, %d)",P0.x,P0.y); m_p +=txt; m_p += 13; m_p += 10; if((P0.y >= 0)&&(P0.y <= q)) m_B += "0"; else if(P0 == mycrv.O) m_B += "0"; else m_B += "1"; //m_B += 13;//by ttyu // m_B += 10;//by ttyu P2 = mycrv.AddPoints(mycrv.MulPoint(P1,C2), mycrv.MulPoint(P0,C1)); P0 = P1; P1 = P2; } } BOOL LFSR_ECDlg::OnInitDialog() { CDialog::OnInitDialog(); // TODO: Add extra initialization here //code for dlg bar CString str="LFSR_EC"; m_cap.SetCaption (str); m_cap.Install (this,WM_MYPAINTMESSAGE); ////////////////////////////// return TRUE; // return TRUE unless you set the focus to a control // EXCEPTION: OCX Property Pages should return FALSE } LRESULT LFSR_ECDlg::PaintMyCaption(WPARAM wp, LPARAM lp) { m_cap.PaintCaption(wp,lp); return 0; } BOOL LFSR_ECDlg::OnSetCursor(CWnd* pWnd, UINT nHitTest, UINT message) { // TODO: Add your message handler code here and/or call default return CDialog::OnSetCursor(pWnd, nHitTest, message); } void LFSR_ECDlg::Onsave() { this->UpdateData(); CFile bitstream; char strFilter[] = { "Stream Records (*.mpl)|*.mpl| (*.pis)|*.pis|All Files (*.*)|*.*||" }; CFileDialog FileDlg(FALSE, ".mpl", NULL, 0, strFilter); //insertion//by TTT CFile cf_object; if( FileDlg.DoModal() == IDOK ){ cf_object.Open( FileDlg.GetFileName(), CFile::modeCreate|CFile::modeWrite); //char szText[100]; //strcpy(szText, "File Write Test"); CString txt; txt=""; txt.Format("%s",m_B);//by ANO AfxMessageBox (txt);//by ANO int mB_size=m_B.GetLength(); cf_object.Write (m_B,mB_size); //insertion end /* if( FileDlg.DoModal() == IDOK ) { if( bitstream.Open(FileDlg.GetFileName(), CFile::modeCreate | CFile::modeWrite) == FALSE ) return; CArchive ar(&bitstream, CArchive::store); CString txt; txt=""; txt.Format("%s",m_B);//by ANO AfxMessageBox (txt);//by ANO //txt=m_B;//by ANO ar <<txt;//by ANO ar.Close(); } else return; bitstream.Close(); */ // TODO: Add your control notification handler code here } }

    Read the article

  • nginx + ssi + remote uri access does not work

    - by stunti
    I have a setup where my nginx is in front with apache+PHP behind. My PHP application cache some page in memcache which are accessed by nginx directly except some dynamic part which are build using SSI in Nginx. The first problem I had was nginx didnt try to use memcache for ssi URI. <!--# include virtual="/myuser" --> So I figured that if I force it to use a full URL, it would do it. <!--# include virtual="http://www.example.com/myuser" --> But in logs file (both nginx and apache) I can see that a slash has been added at the beginning of the url http ssi filter "/http://www.example.com/myuser" In the source code of the SSI module I see a PREFIX that seems to be added, but I can really tell if I can disable it. Anybody got this issue? Nginx version : 0.7.62 on Ubuntu Karmic 64bits Thanks a lot

    Read the article

  • How to create a GtkImage from a Cairo context?

    - by Zurbo82
    I got a paint function that works using a Cairo context and the end result should be a GtkImage (without intermediate image creation). I tried to use the gdk_cairo_create function but this code: ... GdkPixbuf *pixbuf = gdk_pixbuf_new (GDK_COLORSPACE_RGB, FALSE, 8, 22, 22); GtkWidget *image = gtk_image_new_from_pixbuf (pixbuf); GdkDrawable *drawable = image->window; cairo_t *ctx = gdk_cairo_create (drawable); my_cairo_paint_function (ctx); ... fails with: Gdk-CRITICAL **: IA__gdk_cairo_create: assertion `GDK_IS_DRAWABLE (drawable)' failed Same with a simple: #include <gtk/gtk.h> #include <cairo.h> int main (int argc, char *argv[]) { gtk_init(&argc, &argv); cairo_t *ctx = gdk_cairo_create (gtk_widget_get_window (gtk_image_new_from_file ("foobar.png"))); gtk_main(); return 0; } I don't understand why this fails. Any help is appreciated!

    Read the article

  • Casting between variant and bstr_t causing inconsisten crash in Windows 2008

    - by user58470
    We have a C# application, calling a simple C++ wrapper class, that then calls an existing C++ DLL. The C++ code is all VC++ 6.0. We are getting inconsistent behaviour, but the crash, when it happens, always happens within the C++ wrapper DLL, and always in the same spot (have confirmed using painful logging statements). It never happens on any environment except on Windows 2008, so we suspect some bad-but-not-fatal memory trashing is going on that somehow Windows 2008 is being more mindful of. Here's the relevant code, if anyone has any ideas on why this might be crashing it would be much appreciated. We've been tearing our hair out for a few days and project timelines are slipping all for the want of being able to return a simple string back to C#... I've been told we've tried setting the VARIANT vresult using VariantInit, and clearing it when we are done with VariantClear, but that didn't help. // JobMgrDll.cpp : Defines the entry point for the DLL application. // #include "stdafx.h" #include "JobMgrDll.h" #include "jobmgr.h" CString gcontext; CString guser; CString ghost; CString glog; JOBMGRDLL_API int nJobMgrDll=0; extern "C" JOBMGRDLL_API char* perform_billcalc(char* cmd, char* context, char* user,char* host,BSTR* log,int* loglen) { char* result = new char[1000]; memset(result,0,999); result[999] = '\0'; bstr_t bt_command = cmd; UUID uuid = __uuidof(BRLib::Rules); VARIANT vresult; char *p_rv; gcontext = context; guser = user; ghost = host; write_log("execute_job"); p_rv = execute_job(uuid, "none", bt_command, &vresult); write_log("DONE execute_job"); CString message; write_log ("Intializing bstr_t with variant"); // WE ALWAYS GET HERE bstr_t res(vresult); //message.Format("%s result = %s",p_rv,res); //write_log(message); write_log("copying Result"); // WE DON'T ALWAYS GET HERE, BUT SOMETIMES WE DO strcpy(result,(char*)res); write_log(CString(result)); *loglen = glog.GetLength(); *log = glog.AllocSysString(); return result; } Again, any ideas much, much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • RS-232 confusion under C++

    - by rock
    What's the problem in given code? Why it is not showing the output for rs232 when we connect it by the d-9 connector with the short of pin number 2 & 3 in that? #include <bios.h> #include <conio.h> #define COM1 0 #define DATA_READY 0x100 #define SETTINGS ( 0x80 | 0x02 | 0x00 | 0x00) int main(void) { int in, out, status; bioscom(0, SETTINGS, COM1); /*initialize the port*/ cprintf("Data sent to you: "); while (1) { status = bioscom(3, 0, COM1); /*wait until get a data*/ if (status & DATA_READY) if ((out = bioscom(2, 0, COM1) & 0x7F) != 0) /*input a data*/ putch(out); if (kbhit()) { if ((in = getch()) == 27) /* ASCII of Esc*/ break; bioscom(1, in, COM1); /*output a data*/ } } return 0; }

    Read the article

  • PHP Session Id changes between pages

    - by willl69
    Hi All, I have a problem where i am losing the PHP session between 2 pages. The session_start() is included in a file called session-inc.php into every page requiring a session to be set. This works for all pages on the site except one particular page, member-profile.php. When this page is visited a new session with a different id (same session name) is set and used instead. A few more details: Session name is set manually All pages are on the same server under the same domain name If i put an additional session_start() above the include('session-inc.php') in the member-profile.php file, the session is carried over correctly I have tried setting the session_cookie_domain and session.session_name in the .htaccess, this worked for this domain but it stopped the session being passed over to out payment domain We are running apache 2.2.6 with php 5.2.5 Putting the session_start() above the include('session-inc.php') in the member-profile.php file is the quick and dirty fix for this problem, but i am wondering if anybody know why this would be happening. Cheers Will

    Read the article

  • C : Memory layout of C program execution

    - by pavun_cool
    Hi All , I wanted know how the kernel is providing memory for simple C program . For example : #include<stdio.h> #include<malloc.h> int my_global = 10 ; main() { char *str ; static int val ; str = ( char *) malloc ( 100 ) ; scanf ( "%s" , str ) ; printf( " val:%s\n",str ) ; } See, In this program I have used static , global and malloc for allocating dynamic memory So , how the memory lay out will be ... ? Any one give me url , which will have have details information about this process..

    Read the article

  • Problem with basic program using Boost Threads in c++

    - by Eternal Learner
    I have a simple program which creates and executes as thread using boost threads in c++. #include<boost/thread/thread.hpp> #include<iostream> void hello() { std::cout<<"Hello, i am a thread"<<std::endl; } int main() { boost::thread th1(&hello); th1.join(); } The compiler throws an error against the th1.join() line. It says " Multiple markers at this line - undefined reference to `boost::thread::join()' - undefined reference to `boost::thread::~thread()' "

    Read the article

  • Multi-threaded random_r is slower than single threaded version.

    - by Nixuz
    The following program is essentially the same the one described here. When I run and compile the program using two threads (NTHREADS == 2), I get the following run times: real 0m14.120s user 0m25.570s sys 0m0.050s When it is run with just one thread (NTHREADS == 1), I get run times significantly better even though it is only using one core. real 0m4.705s user 0m4.660s sys 0m0.010s My system is dual core, and I know random_r is thread safe and I am pretty sure it is non-blocking. When the same program is run without random_r and a calculation of cosines and sines is used as a replacement, the dual-threaded version runs in about 1/2 the time as expected. #include <pthread.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> #define NTHREADS 2 #define PRNG_BUFSZ 8 #define ITERATIONS 1000000000 void* thread_run(void* arg) { int r1, i, totalIterations = ITERATIONS / NTHREADS; for (i = 0; i < totalIterations; i++){ random_r((struct random_data*)arg, &r1); } printf("%i\n", r1); } int main(int argc, char** argv) { struct random_data* rand_states = (struct random_data*)calloc(NTHREADS, sizeof(struct random_data)); char* rand_statebufs = (char*)calloc(NTHREADS, PRNG_BUFSZ); pthread_t* thread_ids; int t = 0; thread_ids = (pthread_t*)calloc(NTHREADS, sizeof(pthread_t)); /* create threads */ for (t = 0; t < NTHREADS; t++) { initstate_r(random(), &rand_statebufs[t], PRNG_BUFSZ, &rand_states[t]); pthread_create(&thread_ids[t], NULL, &thread_run, &rand_states[t]); } for (t = 0; t < NTHREADS; t++) { pthread_join(thread_ids[t], NULL); } free(thread_ids); free(rand_states); free(rand_statebufs); } I am confused why when generating random numbers the two threaded version performs much worse than the single threaded version, considering random_r is meant to be used in multi-threaded applications.

    Read the article

  • An exception to the "only one implementation" rule ?

    - by ereOn
    While I was reading the accepted answer of this question, I had the following question: Typically, methods are defined in header files (.hpp or whatever), and implementation in source files (.cpp or whatever). One of the main reasons it is bad practice to ever include a "source file" (#include <source_file.cpp>) is that its methods implementation would then be duplicated, resulting in linking errors. When one writes: #ifndef BRITNEYSPEARS_HPP #define BRITNEYSPEARS_HPP class BritneySpears { public: BritneySpears() {}; // Here the constructor has implementation. }; #endif /* BRITNEYSPEARS_HPP */ He is giving the implementation of the constructor (here an "empty" implementation, but still). But why then including this header file multiple times (aka. on different source files) will not generate a "duplicate definition" error at link time ?

    Read the article

  • dependencies linking isnt enough?

    - by Russel
    In Visual Studio (C++) the other day, I was trying to build some example code and it would not work, even though I was pointing at the right include and lib directories. (I got linker errors) I asked a friend who fixed the problem by specifying the necessary .lib files in the General Properties-Linker-Input field of the project settings. My questions: Simply pointing to the directory with the .lib files is not enough? You need to specifically tell the linker which lib files to link? By listing the .lib files in the "additional dependencies" field, am I specifying exactly which static libs get built into the exe? If the answer to this is yes, then will these be the ONLY lib files that get built into the exe? Why is it called "additional" dependencies? Is there another place to specify lib files to include? Before I thought this was done by including the necessary header file? Thanks everyone! Russel

    Read the article

  • django threadedcomments

    - by Patrick
    Hi folks, I would like to setup a comment systems on my site, using django threadedcomments, and I follow all the steps in the Tutorial, however, I get the following error: No module named newforms.util I am not sure what causing this issue, here is my configuration: #settings.py INSTALLED_APPS = ( 'django.contrib.admin', 'django.contrib.auth', 'django.contrib.contenttypes', 'django.contrib.sessions', 'django.contrib.sites', 'myproject.myapp', 'threadedcomments', ) #urls.py from django.conf import settings from django.conf.urls.defaults import * from django.contrib import admin admin.autodiscover() urlpatterns = patterns('', (r'^admin/', include(admin.site.urls)), (r'^threadedcomments/', include('threadedcomments.urls')), ) Please let me know if there is another better choice for commenting, as long as the comment system is flexible and able to do lot of customization, as well as threadedcomment, of coz, integrating with Rating, I am happy to use the other one. Thanks guys.

    Read the article

  • Why this C program outputs a negative number?

    - by JMSA
    I have assigned the complement value in an unsigned variable. Then why this C program outputs a negative number? #include<stdio.h> #include<conio.h> int main() { unsigned int Value = 4; /* 4 = 0000 0000 0000 0100 */ unsigned int result = 0; result = ~ Value; /* -5 = 1111 1111 1111 1011 */ printf("result = %d", result); /* -5 */ getch(); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • how to compile youtube-api appliation

    - by Gpathy
    Hi, i am developing a custom Youtube video player. But i am not able to compile the program. I am missing something in Makefile. My program looks like main.c #include<gdata/services/youtube/gdata-youtube-service.h> int main(int argc, char **argv[]) { printf("Youtube Application\n"); return 0; } makefile gcc `pkg-config --cflags --libs libgdata-google-1.2`  -lgdata-google-1.2 main.c -o youtube When i compile, it is giving error like error: gdata/services/youtube/gdata-youtube-service.h: No such file or directory Do i got to install some other packages ? Or, i need to include something in my Makefile ? Thanks...

    Read the article

  • Should we use temporary variables for the returned values of functions?

    - by totymedli
    I thought about this: Is there a performance difference in these two practices: Store the return value of a function in a temporary variable than give that variable as a parameter to another function. Put the function into the other function. Specification Assuming all classes and functions are written correctly. Case 1. ClassA a = function1(); ClassB b = function2(a); function3(b); Case 2. function3(function2(function1())); I know there aren't a big difference with only one run, but supposed that we could run this a lot of times in a loop, I created some tests. Test #include <iostream> #include <ctime> #include <math.h> using namespace std; int main() { clock_t start = clock(); clock_t ends = clock(); // Case 1. start = clock(); for (int i=0; i<10000000; i++) { double a = cos(1); double b = pow(a, 2); sqrt(b); } ends = clock(); cout << (double) (ends - start) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC << endl; // Case 2. start = clock(); for (int i=0; i<10000000; i++) sqrt(pow(cos(1),2)); ends = clock(); cout << (double) (ends - start) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC << endl; return 0; } Results Case 1 = 6.375 Case 2 = 0.031 Why is the first one is much slower, and if the second one is faster why dont we always write code that way? Anyway does the second pratice has a name? I also wondered what happens if I create the variables outside the for loop in the first case, but the result was the same. Why?

    Read the article

  • Finding if a sentence contains a specific phrase in Ruby

    - by TenJack
    Right now I am seeing if a sentence contains a specific word by splitting the sentence into an array and then doing an include to see if it contains the word. Something like: "This is my awesome sentence.".split(" ").include?('awesome') But I'm wondering what the fastest way to do this with a phrase is. Like if I wanted to see if the sentence "This is my awesome sentence." contains the phrase "my awesome sentence". I am scraping sentences and comparing a very large number of phrases, so speed is somewhat important.

    Read the article

  • searching for hidden files using winapi

    - by Kristian
    HI i want to search for a hidden files and directories in a specefic given path but I don't know how to do it for hidden files i do know how to search for normal files and dir i did this code but im stuck can't make it search for only hidden files #include "stdafx.h" #include <windows.h> int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { TCHAR *fn; fn=L"d:\\*"; HANDLE f; WIN32_FIND_DATA data; { FILE_ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN; } f=FindFirstFile(fn,&data); if(f==INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE){ printf("not found\n"); return 0; } else{ _tprintf(L"found this file: %s\n",data.cFileName); while(FindNextFile(f,&data)){ _tprintf(L"found this file: %s\n",data.cFileName); } } FindClose(f); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • respond_to? and protected methods

    - by mlomnicki
    It may not be so obvious how respond_to? works in ruby. Consider that: class A def public_method end protected def protected_method end private def private_method end end obj = A.new obj.respond_to?(:public_method) # true - that's pretty obvious obj.respond_to?(:private_method) # false - as expected obj.respond_to?(:protected_method) # true - WTF? So if 'obj' responds to protected_method we should expect obj.protected_method not to raise an exception, shouldn't we? ...but it raises obviously Documentation points that calling respond_to? with 2nd argument set to true check private method as well obj.respond_to?(:private_method, true) # true And that's far more reasonable So the question is how to check if object responds to public method only? Is there a solution better than that? obj.methods.include?(:public_method) # true obj.methods.include?(:protected_method) # false

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143  | Next Page >