Search Results

Search found 9836 results on 394 pages for 'saviour self'.

Page 138/394 | < Previous Page | 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145  | Next Page >

  • syntax for generating an objectForKey from an array

    - by Brian
    I'm having success when I use this code to get a string from an array called "fileList": cell.timeBeganLabel.text = [[[self.fileList objectAtIndex:[indexPath row]] lastPathComponent] stringByDeletingPathExtension]; so I expected the same code to generate the same string as a key for me in this: NSDictionary *stats = [thisRecordingsStats objectForKey:[[[self.fileList objectAtIndex:[indexPath row]] lastPathComponent] stringByDeletingPathExtension]]; cell.durationLabel.text = [stats objectForKey:@"duration"]; or this: NSDictionary *stats = [thisRecordingsStats objectForKey:@"%@",[[[self.fileList objectAtIndex:[indexPath row]] lastPathComponent] stringByDeletingPathExtension]]; Both build without error, and the log shows my data is there: but I'm getting a blank UILabel. Have I not written the dynamic key generator correctly?

    Read the article

  • iPodMusicPlayer doesn't send notifications, if it is created in background

    - by Aleksejs
    If iPodMusicPlayer is created in background, then I doesn't send notifications about playback state changes. Here is code: - (void)initMusicPlayer { musicPlayer = [MPMusicPlayerController iPodMusicPlayer]; NSNotificationCenter *notificationCenter = [NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter]; [notificationCenter addObserver:self selector:@selector(musicPlayerStateChanged:) name:MPMusicPlayerControllerNowPlayingItemDidChangeNotification object:musicPlayer]; [notificationCenter addObserver:self selector:@selector(musicPlayerStateChanged:) name:MPMusicPlayerControllerPlaybackStateDidChangeNotification object:musicPlayer]; [musicPlayer beginGeneratingPlaybackNotifications]; } - (void)viewDidLoad { [self performSelectorInBackground:@selector(initMusicPlayer) withObject:nil]; } Is there some way how to create iPodMusicPlayer in background? Otherwise if it is created on the main thread, it blocks executions for a while.

    Read the article

  • How to increment a value using a C-Preprocessor?

    - by mystify
    Example: I try to do this: static NSInteger stepNum = 1; #define METHODNAME(i) -(void)step##i #define STEP METHODNAME(stepNum++) @implementation Test STEP { // do stuff... [self nextFrame:@selector(step2) afterDelay:1]; } STEP { // do stuff... [self nextFrame:@selector(step3) afterDelay:1]; } STEP { // do stuff... [self nextFrame:@selector(step4) afterDelay:1]; } // ... When building, Xcode complains that it can't increment stepNum. This seems logical to me, because at this time the code is not "alive" and this pre-processing substitution stuff happens before actually compiling the source code. Is there another way I could have an variable be incremented on every usage of STEP macro, the easy way?

    Read the article

  • Why does decorating a class break the descriptor protocol, thus preventing staticmethod objects from behaving as expected?

    - by Robru
    I need a little bit of help understanding the subtleties of the descriptor protocol in Python, as it relates specifically to the behavior of staticmethod objects. I'll start with a trivial example, and then iteratively expand it, examining it's behavior at each step: class Stub: @staticmethod def do_things(): """Call this like Stub.do_things(), with no arguments or instance.""" print "Doing things!" At this point, this behaves as expected, but what's going on here is a bit subtle: When you call Stub.do_things(), you are not invoking do_things directly. Instead, Stub.do_things refers to a staticmethod instance, which has wrapped the function we want up inside it's own descriptor protocol such that you are actually invoking staticmethod.__get__, which first returns the function that we want, and then gets called afterwards. >>> Stub <class __main__.Stub at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things <function do_things at 0x...> >>> Stub.__dict__['do_things'] <staticmethod object at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things() Doing things! So far so good. Next, I need to wrap the class in a decorator that will be used to customize class instantiation -- the decorator will determine whether to allow new instantiations or provide cached instances: def deco(cls): def factory(*args, **kwargs): # pretend there is some logic here determining # whether to make a new instance or not return cls(*args, **kwargs) return factory @deco class Stub: @staticmethod def do_things(): """Call this like Stub.do_things(), with no arguments or instance.""" print "Doing things!" Now, naturally this part as-is would be expected to break staticmethods, because the class is now hidden behind it's decorator, ie, Stub not a class at all, but an instance of factory that is able to produce instances of Stub when you call it. Indeed: >>> Stub <function factory at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> AttributeError: 'function' object has no attribute 'do_things' >>> Stub() <__main__.Stub instance at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things <function do_things at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things() Doing things! So far I understand what's happening here. My goal is to restore the ability for staticmethods to function as you would expect them to, even though the class is wrapped. As luck would have it, the Python stdlib includes something called functools, which provides some tools just for this purpose, ie, making functions behave more like other functions that they wrap. So I change my decorator to look like this: def deco(cls): @functools.wraps(cls) def factory(*args, **kwargs): # pretend there is some logic here determining # whether to make a new instance or not return cls(*args, **kwargs) return factory Now, things start to get interesting: >>> Stub <function Stub at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things <staticmethod object at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: 'staticmethod' object is not callable >>> Stub() <__main__.Stub instance at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things <function do_things at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things() Doing things! Wait.... what? functools copies the staticmethod over to the wrapping function, but it's not callable? Why not? What did I miss here? I was playing around with this for a bit and I actually came up with my own reimplementation of staticmethod that allows it to function in this situation, but I don't really understand why it was necessary or if this is even the best solution to this problem. Here's the complete example: class staticmethod(object): """Make @staticmethods play nice with decorated classes.""" def __init__(self, func): self.func = func def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs): """Provide the expected behavior inside decorated classes.""" return self.func(*args, **kwargs) def __get__(self, obj, objtype=None): """Re-implement the standard behavior for undecorated classes.""" return self.func def deco(cls): @functools.wraps(cls) def factory(*args, **kwargs): # pretend there is some logic here determining # whether to make a new instance or not return cls(*args, **kwargs) return factory @deco class Stub: @staticmethod def do_things(): """Call this like Stub.do_things(), with no arguments or instance.""" print "Doing things!" Indeed it works exactly as expected: >>> Stub <function Stub at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things <__main__.staticmethod object at 0x...> >>> Stub.do_things() Doing things! >>> Stub() <__main__.Stub instance at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things <function do_things at 0x...> >>> Stub().do_things() Doing things! What approach would you take to make a staticmethod behave as expected inside a decorated class? Is this the best way? Why doesn't the builtin staticmethod implement __call__ on it's own in order for this to just work without any fuss? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Add subview (rows) fast to UIScrollView while scrolling

    - by tikhop
    I have UIScrollView with a lot of rows (~100) and I implemented dequeueReusableRow method for fast allocating and adding my subviews (rows). Everything work fine, but if I scroll very fast with decelerate some view don't added to scrollView on time only later. - (UIView *)dequeueReusableRow { UIView *view = [reusableRows anyObject]; if(view) { [[view retain] autorelease]; [reusableRows removeObject:view]; }else{ view = [[UIView alloc] init.... } return view; } - (void)addVisibleRows { UIView *row = [self dequeueReusableRow]; row.frame = .... [scrollView addSubview:row] } - (void)scrollViewDidScroll:(UIScrollView *)scrollView { [self addVisibleRows]; [self removeInvisibleRows]; } Please, don't propose me use UITableView because structure of accordion looks like: section - section -- section --- row - section section - row

    Read the article

  • Please explain class methods

    - by user1209902
    I'm finding it difficult to understand when it is necessary to create class methods. From what I've read, they are important for creating new objects, but I do not see how. The following class create a simple shape black rectangle. Can anyone show me how to incorporate a class method to do something that I could not do with an instance method? Shape.h #import <UIKit/UIKit.h> @interface Shape : UIView; - (id) initWithX: (int)xVal andY: (int)yVal; @end Shape.m #import "Shape.h" @implementation Shape - (id) initWithX:(int )xVal andY:(int)yVal { self = [super init]; UIView *shape = [[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectMake(xVal, yVal, 10, 10)]; shape.backgroundColor = [UIColor blackColor]; [self addSubview:shape]; return self; } @end

    Read the article

  • is counter has certain value inside a class in python

    - by mazlor
    i am learning classes in python and when i was reading the documentation i found this example that i didn't understand : class MyClass: """A simple example class""" def __init__(self): self.data = [] i = 12345 def f(self): return 'hello world' then if we assign : x = MyClass() x.counter = 1 now if we implement while loop : while x.counter < 10: x.counter = x.counter * 2 so the value of x.counter will be : 16 while for example if we have a variable y : y = 1 while y < 1 : y = y *2 then if we look for the value of y we find it 1 so i don't know how is the value of counter became 16 . thanks

    Read the article

  • what's called after returning from presentModalViewController / dismissModalViewControllerAnimated:

    - by Reinhard
    to show a modal uiview out of my mainView I use: [self presentModalViewController:myController animated:YES]; and in MyController I close that view with: [self dismissModalViewControllerAnimated:YES]; But how can I know in the mainView that the modal was finished (to redraw my table)? Currently I set a local variable to YES in my mainView after starting the modal view an react on viewWillAppear: [self presentModalViewController:myController animated:YES]; _reloadTableData = YES; -(void)viewWillAppear:(BOOL)animated { [super viewWillAppear:animated]; if (_reloadTableData) { _reloadTableData = NO; [_tableView reloadData]; } } Is there a better way to do so ?

    Read the article

  • UIWebView appears null when calling fro a method

    - by Alexidze
    I have a major problem when trying to access a UIWebView that was created during ViewDidLoad, the UIWebView appears null here is how i declare the property @property (nonatomic, retain) UIWebView *detailsView; the implementation @implementation iPadMainViewController @synthesize detailsView; - (void)viewDidLoad { [super viewDidLoad]; detailsView = [[UIWebView alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectMake(500, 0, 512, 768)]; [self.view addSubView:detailsView]; } When accessing from - (void)loadDetailedContent:(NSString *)s { NSLog(@"%@", detailsView); } I get NULL, is it a normal behavior or am i doing something wrong? here is the touchesBegan that is being called, from the views subclass that is being touched, -(void)touchesBegan:(NSSet *)touches withEvent:(UIEvent *)event { iPadMainViewController *mycontroller = [[iPadMainViewController alloc] init]; self.delegate = mycontroller; [self.delegate loadDetailedContent:NewsId]; }

    Read the article

  • UIViewController: setToolbarItems vs navigationItem

    - by Paul Sanwald
    my application has a UIViewController subclass which is being managed by a UINavigationController. In the viewDidLoad of my UIViewController subclass, I was attempting to add a UIBarButtonItem to the toolbar like this: settingsButton = [[UIBarButtonItem alloc] initWithTitle:@"Settings" style:UIBarButtonItemStylePlain target:self action:@selector(viewSettings:)]; [self setToolbarItems:[NSArray arrayWithObject:settingsButton]]; this wasn't working out for me, so after some googling around, I tried this: [[self navigationItem] setRightBarButtonItem:settingsButton]; which worked out fine. from reading the UIViewController documentation, I'm still confused about why setToolbarItems wasn't working. I verified in the debugger that the button was in the toolbarItems array in the viewDidAppear method. the button itself just wasn't appearing on my toolbar. so, my question is, why didn't setToolbarItems work for me in the first code snippet? I don't have the toolbar configured in my xib for this view controller at all, if that makes a difference.

    Read the article

  • show activity indicator while loading ViewController

    - by Crystal
    I have a ViewController that takes time to load its views. When I run Instruments, I see from the home screen, if I tap on the icon that pushes that view controller onto the stack, it's half laying out the views, and half getting the data for the views. I tried adding an activity indicator to display on the home screen over the button when the button is pressed to push the LongRunningViewController onto the stack. So I basically do this: - (IBAction)puzzleView:(id)sender { dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{ [self.activityIndicator startAnimating]; }); PuzzleViewController *detailViewController = [[[PuzzleViewController alloc] init] autorelease]; [self.navigationController pushViewController:detailViewController animated:YES]; [self.activityIndicator stopAnimating]; }

    Read the article

  • UIImage for UIImageView is nil

    - by yeesterbunny
    I'm having problem displaying UIImage in UIImageView. I looked all over stackoverflow for similar questions, but none of the fixes helped me. The image is indeed in my bundle File Inspector - Target Membership is checked for the image IBOutlet is connected (I have tried both using IBOutlet and doing it programmatically) Both png nor jpg works Here's the code for using Interface Builder - //@property and @synthesize set for IBOutlet UIImageView *imageView - (void)viewDidLoad { [super viewDidLoad]; NSAssert(self.imageView, @"self.imageView is nil. Check your IBOutlet connection"); UIImage *image = [UIImage imageNamed:@"banner.jpg"]; NSAssert(image, @"image is nil"); self.imageView.image = image; } This code will terminate with NSAssert, printing in the console that 'image is nil'. I also tried selecting the Image directly from the attributes inspector: However it still doesn't show the image (still terminates with NSAssert - 'image is nil'). Any help or suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thanks

    Read the article

  • How can i call NStimer form one viewcontroller from unother viewcontroller?

    - by Bala
    At first time i call the timer like this in Third viewcontroller timer = [NSTimer scheduledTimerWithTimeInterval:1.0 target:self selector:@selector(targetMethod) userInfo:nil repeats:NO]; Then timer called the targetMethod -(void)targetMethod { First * sVC = [[First alloc] initWithNibName:@"First" bundle:[NSBundle mainBundle]]; [self presentModalViewController:sVC animated:YES]; [sVC release]; [timer invalidate]; } First viewcontroller opened.. In First viewcontroller had one button.In button action i wrote (IBAction) Action:(id)sender { [self dismissModalViewControllerAnimated:YES]; Third *BVC=[[Third alloc]init]; [Bvc TimerStart]; Timestart is function i start timer in this function.. i want to call Third viewcontroller timer function this place } timer started..But view didn't open (first )viewcontroller....... Please help me......

    Read the article

  • imagePickerController move and scale does not work

    - by ghostrider
    Here is my code: -(void) takePhoto { UIImagePickerController *imagePickerController = [[UIImagePickerController alloc] init]; imagePickerController.sourceType = UIImagePickerControllerSourceTypeCamera; //imagePickerController.editing = YES; imagePickerController.allowsEditing=YES; imagePickerController.delegate = self; [self presentViewController:imagePickerController animated:YES completion:NULL]; } #pragma mark - Image picker delegate methdos -(void)imagePickerController:(UIImagePickerController *)picker didFinishPickingMediaWithInfo:(NSDictionary *)info { [picker dismissViewControllerAnimated:NO completion:nil]; [self.Picture setImage:[info objectForKey:UIImagePickerControllerOriginalImage]]; } and I have implemented the delegates UINavigationControllerDelegate,UIImagePickerControllerDelegate The image is taken, I can see the move and scale box, but when i move it the box returns to the initial posision - likes it bounces back. Why is that?

    Read the article

  • How do you extend a Ruby module with macro-like metaprogramming methods?

    - by Ian Terrell
    Consider the following extension (the pattern popularized by several Rails plugins over the years): module Extension def self.included(recipient) recipient.extend ClassMethods recipient.class_eval { include InstanceMethods } end module ClassMethods def macro_method puts "Called macro_method within #{self.name}" end end module InstanceMethods def instance_method puts "Called instance_method within #{self.object_id}" end end end If you wished to expose this to every class, you can do the following: Object.send :include, Extension Now you can define any class and use the macro method: class FooClass macro_method end #=> Called macro_method within FooClass And instances can use the instance methods: FooClass.new.instance_method #=> Called instance_method within 2148182320 But even though Module.is_a?(Object), you cannot use the macro method in a module: module FooModule macro_method end #=> undefined local variable or method `macro_method' for FooModule:Module (NameError) This is true even if you explicitly include the original Extension into Module with Module.send(:include, Extension). How do you add macro like methods to Ruby modules?

    Read the article

  • PHP troubleshooting unexpected T_PUBLIC error

    - by jasondavis
    PHP is driving me insane right now, please help me, I must be missing something. In this VERY BASIC example below I get this error... Parse error:syntax error, unexpected T_PUBLIC in C:\filename here on line 12 On this line.... public static function getInstance(){ The code... <?PHP class Session{ private static $instance; function __construct() { { session_start(); echo 'Session object created<BR><BR>'; } public static function getInstance(){ if (!self::$instance) { self::$instance = new Session(); } return self::$instance; } }

    Read the article

  • Push a detail view in UITableViewCell class

    - by luca
    My class inherit from UITableViewCell, i have make some custom transitions to push a new detail view when an image get selected. [UIView transitionWithView:self.masterView duration:0.5 options:UIViewAnimationOptionShowHideTransitionViews animations:^ { [self.masterView addSubview:self.detailImage]; } completion:nil]; My code works fine, the detailImage subview is shown with a transition, but this transition is not what i want exactly. What i want to perform is a simple transition from bottom to up. The list of UIViewAnimation doesn't contain such animation. Is there any way to use that transition without changing my class inheritance to UINavigationController ?

    Read the article

  • django overwrite form clean method

    - by John
    Hi, When overwriting a form clean method how do you know if its failed validation on any of the fields? e.g. in the form below if I overwrite the clean method how do I know if the form has failed validation on any of the fields? class PersonForm(forms.Form): title = Forms.CharField(max_length=100) first_name = Forms.CharField(max_length=100) surname = Forms.CharField(max_length=100) password = Forms.CharField(max_length=100) def clean(self, value): cleaned_data = self.cleaned_data IF THE FORM HAS FAILED VALIDATION: self.data['password'] = 'abc' raise forms.ValidationError("You have failed validation!") ELSE: return cleaned_data Thanks

    Read the article

  • UITableView headings shown on top of MBProgressHUD

    - by Chris Ballinger
    So I have a subclass of UITableViewController that loads some data from the internet and uses MBProgressHUD during the loading process. I use the standard MBProgressHUD initialization. HUD = [[MBProgressHUD alloc] initWithView:self.view]; [self.view addSubview:HUD]; HUD.delegate = self; HUD.labelText = @"Loading"; [HUD show:YES]; This is the result: . Is there any way to resolve this issue, or should I just abandon MBProgressHUD? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Convert sets to frozensets as values of a dictionary

    - by Space_C0wb0y
    I have dictionary that is built as part of the initialization of my object. I know that it will not change during the lifetime of the object. The dictionary maps keys to sets. I want to convert all the values from sets to frozensets, to make sure they do not get changed. Currently I do that like this: for key in self.my_dict.iterkeys(): self.my_dict[key] = frozenset(self.my_dict[key]) Is there a simpler way to achieve this? I cannot build frozenset right away, because I do not how much items will be in each set until i have built the complete dictionary.

    Read the article

  • Numeric GUI bottleneck

    - by Physic
    Hi all, I've made a GUI to set up and start a numerical integrator using PyQT4, Wing, QT, and Python 2.6.6, on my Mac. The thing is, when I run the integrator form the GUI, it takes very many times longer than when I crudely run the integrator from the command line. As an example, a 1000 year integration took 98 seconds on the command line and ~570 seconds from the GUI. In the GUI, the integration runs from a thread and then returns. It uses a a queue to communicate back to the GUI. Does anyone have any ideas as to where the bottleneck is? I suspect that others may be experiencing something like this just on a smaller scale. t = threading.Thread( target=self.threadsafe_start_thread, args=( self.queue, self.selected ) ) t.start() Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to pass value to another view-controllers?

    - by ICoder
    I want to pass localstringtextnote to Uploadviewcontroller by this way , UIViewController *controllerNew = [[UploadViewController alloc] initWithNibName:@"UploadView" bundle:nil owner:self]; controllerNew.localStringtextnote = localStringtextnote; [self.navigationController pushViewController:controllerNew animated:YES]; [controllerNew release]; but i got this error"@property localstringtextnote not fond in the object of type uiviewcontroller" or i want to pass through modalTransistionstyle UploadViewController *aSecondViewController = [[UploadViewController alloc] initWithNibName:@"UploadView" bundle:nil]; aSecondViewController.modalTransitionStyle = UIModalTransitionStyleCoverVertical; [self presentModalViewController:aSecondViewController animated:YES]; [UIView commitAnimations]; How to do this?Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Adding a UILabel to a UIToolbar

    - by Boolean
    I'm trying to add a label to my toolbar. Button works great, however when I add the label object, it crashes. Any ideas? UIBarButtonItem *setDateRangeButton = [[UIBarButtonItem alloc] initWithTitle:@"Set date range" style:UIBarButtonItemStyleBordered target:self action:@selector(setDateRangeClicked:)]; UILabel *label = [[UILabel alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectMake(5, 5, 20, 20)]; label.text = @"test"; [toolbar setItems:[NSArray arrayWithObjects:setDateRangeButton,label, nil]]; // Add the toolbar as a subview to the navigation controller. [self.navigationController.view addSubview:toolbar]; // Reload the table view [self.tableView reloadData];

    Read the article

  • Object initialization sequence in Objective-C

    - by Alex
    Hello everyone. The Cocoa framework has a convention to always call self = [super init] in the init method of an inherited class, because [super init] may return a new instance. What will happen if I do this? @interface MyClass : NSObject /* or any other class */ { int ivar_; } @end @implementation MyClass - (id)init { ivar_ = 12345; if ((self = [super init])) { NSLog(@"ivar_'s value is %d", ivar_); } return self; } @end In the case when [super init] returns a new instance, what will I see in the console? ivar_'s value is 0? I can't think of a way to check this myself, because I don't know which class may return a new instance from its init method. Also, can't seem to find explicit clarification for this scenario in the docs. Could anyone help me out? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to test that invalid arguments raise an ArgumentError exception using RSpec?

    - by John Topley
    I'm writing a RubyGem that can raise an ArgumentError if the arguments supplied to its single method are invalid. How can I write a test for this using RSpec? The example below shows the sort of implementation I have in mind. The bar method expects a single boolean argument (:baz), the type of which is checked to make sure that it actually is a boolean: module Foo def self.bar(options = {}) baz = options.fetch(:baz, true) validate_arguments(baz) end def self.validate_arguments(baz) raise(ArgumentError, ":baz must be a boolean") unless valid_baz?(baz) end def self.valid_baz?(baz) baz.is_a?(TrueClass) || baz.is_a?(FalseClass) end end

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145  | Next Page >