Search Results

Search found 144862 results on 5795 pages for 'code new'.

Page 14/5795 | < Previous Page | 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  | Next Page >

• How to prevent code from leaking outside work?

  - by AeroCross

  I'm working on an institution that has a really strong sense of "possession" - each line of software we write should be only ours. Ironically, I'm the only programmer (ATM), but we're planning in hiring others. Since my bosses wouldn't count the new programmers as people they can trust, they have an issue with the copies of the source code. We use Git, so they would have a entire copy of each of the projects they work on, when they clone the repository. We can restrict access to them to a single key with Gitolite and bind that to their PC's, but they can copy those keys to another computer and they would have the repository access in another PC. Also (and the most obvious method) they could just upload the files somewhere else, add another remote, or just copy the files to an USB drive. Is there any (perhaps clever) way to prevent events like these?

  Read the article

• I can''t figure out how to use the comboBox to remove radiobuttons

  - by user3576336

  import java.awt.EventQueue; import javax.swing.JFrame; import javax.swing.JPanel; import javax.swing.border.EmptyBorder; import javax.swing.ButtonGroup; import javax.swing.JLabel; import javax.swing.JDesktopPane; import javax.swing.JRadioButton; import javax.swing.JComboBox; import java.awt.GridBagLayout; import java.awt.GridBagConstraints; import java.awt.Insets; import java.awt.Color; import java.awt.event.ActionEvent; import java.awt.event.ActionListener; @SuppressWarnings("serial") public class Calendar1 extends JFrame implements ActionListener { private JPanel contentPane; String[] Months = { "January", "February", "March", "April", "May", "June", "July", "August", "September", "October", "November", "December" }; JDesktopPane desktopPane; ButtonGroup bG = new ButtonGroup(); JRadioButton radioButton, rdbtnNewRadioButton, radioButton_1, radioButton_2, radioButton_3, radioButton_4, radioButton_5, radioButton_6, radioButton_7, radioButton_8, radioButton_9, radioButton_10, radioButton_11, radioButton_12, radioButton_13, radioButton_14, radioButton_15, radioButton_16, radioButton_17, radioButton_18, radioButton_19, radioButton_20, radioButton_21, radioButton_22, radioButton_23, radioButton_24, radioButton_25, radioButton_26, radioButton_27, radioButton_28, radioButton_29; /** * Launch the application. */ public static void main(String[] args) { EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable() { public void run() { try { Calendar1 frame = new Calendar1(); frame.setVisible(true); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } }); } /** * Create the frame. */ @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") public Calendar1() { setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE); setBounds(100, 100, 521, 300); contentPane = new JPanel(); contentPane.setBorder(new EmptyBorder(5, 5, 5, 5)); setContentPane(contentPane); contentPane.setLayout(null); JComboBox comboBox = new JComboBox(Months); comboBox.setBounds(28, 16, 132, 27); contentPane.add(comboBox); comboBox.setSelectedIndex(0); comboBox.addActionListener(this); JLabel label = new JLabel("2014"); label.setBounds(350, 20, 61, 16); contentPane.add(label); desktopPane = new JDesktopPane(); desktopPane.setBackground(new Color(30, 144, 255)); desktopPane.setBounds(0, 63, 495, 188); contentPane.add(desktopPane); GridBagLayout gbl_desktopPane = new GridBagLayout(); gbl_desktopPane.columnWidths = new int[] { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }; gbl_desktopPane.rowHeights = new int[] { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }; gbl_desktopPane.columnWeights = new double[] { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, Double.MIN_VALUE }; gbl_desktopPane.rowWeights = new double[] { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, Double.MIN_VALUE }; desktopPane.setLayout(gbl_desktopPane); // JLabel lblSun = new JLabel("Sun"); // lblSun.setForeground(Color.RED); // // GridBagConstraints gbc_lblSun = new GridBagConstraints(); // gbc_lblSun.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); // gbc_lblSun.gridx = 2; // gbc_lblSun.gridy = 0; // desktopPane.add(lblSun, gbc_lblSun); // // JLabel lblMon = new JLabel("Mon"); // GridBagConstraints gbc_lblMon = new GridBagConstraints(); // gbc_lblMon.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); // gbc_lblMon.gridx = 4; // gbc_lblMon.gridy = 0; // desktopPane.add(lblMon, gbc_lblMon); // // JLabel lblTues = new JLabel("Tues"); // GridBagConstraints gbc_lblTues = new GridBagConstraints(); // gbc_lblTues.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); // gbc_lblTues.gridx = 6; // gbc_lblTues.gridy = 0; // desktopPane.add(lblTues, gbc_lblTues); // // JLabel lblWed = new JLabel("Wed"); // GridBagConstraints gbc_lblWed = new GridBagConstraints(); // gbc_lblWed.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); // gbc_lblWed.gridx = 8; // gbc_lblWed.gridy = 0; // desktopPane.add(lblWed, gbc_lblWed); // // JLabel lblThurs = new JLabel("Thurs"); // GridBagConstraints gbc_lblThurs = new GridBagConstraints(); // gbc_lblThurs.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); // gbc_lblThurs.gridx = 10; // gbc_lblThurs.gridy = 0; // desktopPane.add(lblThurs, gbc_lblThurs); // // JLabel lblFri = new JLabel("Friday"); // GridBagConstraints gbc_lblFri = new GridBagConstraints(); // gbc_lblFri.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); // gbc_lblFri.gridx = 12; // gbc_lblFri.gridy = 0; // desktopPane.add(lblFri, gbc_lblFri); // // JLabel lblSat = new JLabel("Sat"); // lblSat.setForeground(Color.RED); // GridBagConstraints gbc_lblSat = new GridBagConstraints(); // gbc_lblSat.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); // gbc_lblSat.gridx = 14; // gbc_lblSat.gridy = 0; // desktopPane.add(lblSat, gbc_lblSat); radioButton = new JRadioButton("1"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton.gridx = 8; gbc_radioButton.gridy = 1; desktopPane.add(radioButton, gbc_radioButton); bG.add(radioButton); rdbtnNewRadioButton = new JRadioButton("2"); GridBagConstraints gbc_rdbtnNewRadioButton = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_rdbtnNewRadioButton.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_rdbtnNewRadioButton.gridx = 10; gbc_rdbtnNewRadioButton.gridy = 1; desktopPane.add(rdbtnNewRadioButton, gbc_rdbtnNewRadioButton); bG.add(rdbtnNewRadioButton); radioButton_1 = new JRadioButton("3"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_1 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_1.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_1.gridx = 12; gbc_radioButton_1.gridy = 1; desktopPane.add(radioButton_1, gbc_radioButton_1); bG.add(radioButton_1); radioButton_2 = new JRadioButton("4"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_2 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_2.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_2.gridx = 14; gbc_radioButton_2.gridy = 1; desktopPane.add(radioButton_2, gbc_radioButton_2); bG.add(radioButton_2); radioButton_3 = new JRadioButton("5"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_3 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_3.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_3.gridx = 2; gbc_radioButton_3.gridy = 2; desktopPane.add(radioButton_3, gbc_radioButton_3); bG.add(radioButton_3); radioButton_4 = new JRadioButton("6"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_4 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_4.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_4.gridx = 4; gbc_radioButton_4.gridy = 2; desktopPane.add(radioButton_4, gbc_radioButton_4); bG.add(radioButton_4); radioButton_5 = new JRadioButton("7"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_5 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_5.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_5.gridx = 6; gbc_radioButton_5.gridy = 2; desktopPane.add(radioButton_5, gbc_radioButton_5); bG.add(radioButton_5); radioButton_6 = new JRadioButton("8"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_6 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_6.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_6.gridx = 8; gbc_radioButton_6.gridy = 2; desktopPane.add(radioButton_6, gbc_radioButton_6); bG.add(radioButton_6); radioButton_7 = new JRadioButton("9"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_7 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_7.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_7.gridx = 10; gbc_radioButton_7.gridy = 2; desktopPane.add(radioButton_7, gbc_radioButton_7); bG.add(radioButton_7); radioButton_8 = new JRadioButton("10"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_8 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_8.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_8.gridx = 12; gbc_radioButton_8.gridy = 2; desktopPane.add(radioButton_8, gbc_radioButton_8); bG.add(radioButton_8); radioButton_9 = new JRadioButton("11"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_9 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_9.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_9.gridx = 14; gbc_radioButton_9.gridy = 2; desktopPane.add(radioButton_9, gbc_radioButton_9); bG.add(radioButton_9); radioButton_10 = new JRadioButton("12"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_10 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_10.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_10.gridx = 2; gbc_radioButton_10.gridy = 3; desktopPane.add(radioButton_10, gbc_radioButton_10); bG.add(radioButton_10); radioButton_11 = new JRadioButton("13"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_11 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_11.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_11.gridx = 4; gbc_radioButton_11.gridy = 3; desktopPane.add(radioButton_11, gbc_radioButton_11); bG.add(radioButton_11); radioButton_12 = new JRadioButton("14"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_12 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_12.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_12.gridx = 6; gbc_radioButton_12.gridy = 3; desktopPane.add(radioButton_12, gbc_radioButton_12); bG.add(radioButton_12); radioButton_13 = new JRadioButton("15"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_13 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_13.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_13.gridx = 8; gbc_radioButton_13.gridy = 3; desktopPane.add(radioButton_13, gbc_radioButton_13); bG.add(radioButton_13); radioButton_14 = new JRadioButton("16"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_14 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_14.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_14.gridx = 10; gbc_radioButton_14.gridy = 3; desktopPane.add(radioButton_14, gbc_radioButton_14); bG.add(radioButton_14); radioButton_15 = new JRadioButton("17"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_15 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_15.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_15.gridx = 12; gbc_radioButton_15.gridy = 3; desktopPane.add(radioButton_15, gbc_radioButton_15); bG.add(radioButton_15); radioButton_16 = new JRadioButton("18"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_16 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_16.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_16.gridx = 14; gbc_radioButton_16.gridy = 3; desktopPane.add(radioButton_16, gbc_radioButton_16); bG.add(radioButton_16); radioButton_17 = new JRadioButton("19"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_17 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_17.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_17.gridx = 2; gbc_radioButton_17.gridy = 4; desktopPane.add(radioButton_17, gbc_radioButton_17); bG.add(radioButton_17); radioButton_18 = new JRadioButton("20"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_18 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_18.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_18.gridx = 4; gbc_radioButton_18.gridy = 4; desktopPane.add(radioButton_18, gbc_radioButton_18); bG.add(radioButton_18); radioButton_19 = new JRadioButton("21"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_19 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_19.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_19.gridx = 6; gbc_radioButton_19.gridy = 4; desktopPane.add(radioButton_19, gbc_radioButton_19); bG.add(radioButton_19); radioButton_20 = new JRadioButton("22"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_20 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_20.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_20.gridx = 8; gbc_radioButton_20.gridy = 4; desktopPane.add(radioButton_20, gbc_radioButton_20); bG.add(radioButton_20); radioButton_21 = new JRadioButton("23"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_21 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_21.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_21.gridx = 10; gbc_radioButton_21.gridy = 4; desktopPane.add(radioButton_21, gbc_radioButton_21); bG.add(radioButton_21); radioButton_22 = new JRadioButton("24"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_22 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_22.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_22.gridx = 12; gbc_radioButton_22.gridy = 4; desktopPane.add(radioButton_22, gbc_radioButton_22); bG.add(radioButton_22); radioButton_23 = new JRadioButton("25"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_23 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_23.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_23.gridx = 14; gbc_radioButton_23.gridy = 4; desktopPane.add(radioButton_23, gbc_radioButton_23); bG.add(radioButton_23); radioButton_24 = new JRadioButton("26"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_24 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_24.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_24.gridx = 2; gbc_radioButton_24.gridy = 5; desktopPane.add(radioButton_24, gbc_radioButton_24); bG.add(radioButton_24); radioButton_25 = new JRadioButton("27"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_25 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_25.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_25.gridx = 4; gbc_radioButton_25.gridy = 5; desktopPane.add(radioButton_25, gbc_radioButton_25); bG.add(radioButton_25); radioButton_26 = new JRadioButton("28"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_26 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_26.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_26.gridx = 6; gbc_radioButton_26.gridy = 5; desktopPane.add(radioButton_26, gbc_radioButton_26); bG.add(radioButton_26); radioButton_27 = new JRadioButton("29"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_27 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_27.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_27.gridx = 8; gbc_radioButton_27.gridy = 5; desktopPane.add(radioButton_27, gbc_radioButton_27); bG.add(radioButton_27); radioButton_28 = new JRadioButton("30"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_28 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_28.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_28.gridx = 10; gbc_radioButton_28.gridy = 5; desktopPane.add(radioButton_28, gbc_radioButton_28); bG.add(radioButton_28); radioButton_29 = new JRadioButton("31"); GridBagConstraints gbc_radioButton_29 = new GridBagConstraints(); gbc_radioButton_29.insets = new Insets(0, 0, 5, 5); gbc_radioButton_29.gridx = 12; gbc_radioButton_29.gridy = 5; desktopPane.add(radioButton_29, gbc_radioButton_29); bG.add(radioButton_29); } @Override public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) { JComboBox cb = (JComboBox) e.getSource(); String months = (String) cb.getSelectedItem(); if (months.equals("February")) { desktopPane.remove(radioButton_28); desktopPane.revalidate(); } } } I'm trying to use the combobox to remove radiobuttons in the actionperformed, but when I run the program, nothing happens, nor can I enable new buttons in the actionperformed. Thank you so much in advance for helping me out.

  Read the article

• Gathering all data in single iteration vs using functions for readable code

  - by user828584

  Say I have an array of runners with which I need to find the tallest runner, the fastest runner, and the lightest runner. It seems like the most readable solution would be: runners = getRunners(); tallestRunner = getTallestRunner(runners); fastestRunner = getFastestRunner(runners); lightestRunner = getLightestRunner(runners); ..where each function iterates over the runners and keeps track of the largest height, greatest speed, and lowest weight. Iterating over the array three times, however, doesn't seem like a very good idea. It would instead be better to do: int greatestHeght, greatestSpeed, leastWeight; Runner tallestRunner, fastestRunner, lightestRunner; for(runner in runners){ if(runner.height > greatestHeight) { greatestHeight = runner.height; tallestRunner = runner; } if(runner.speed > ... } While this isn't too unreadable, it can get messy when there is more logic for each piece of information being extracted in the iteration. What's the middle ground here? How can I use only a single iteration while still keeping the code divided into logical units?

  Read the article

• Formatting php, what works more efficiently?

  - by JamesM-SiteGen

  Hello fellow programmers, I was just wondering what makes php work faster, I have a few methods that I always go and do, but that only improves the way I can read it, but how about the interpreter? Should I include the curly braces when there is only one statement to run? if(...){ echo "test"; } # Or.. if(...) echo "test"; === Which should be used? I have also found http://beta.phpformatter.com/ and I find the following settings to be good, but are they? Indentation: Indentation style: {K&R (One true brace style)} Indent with: {Tabs} Starting indentation: [1] Indentation: [1] Common: [x] Remove all comments [x] Remove empty lines [x] Align assignments statements nicely [ ] Put a comment with the condition after if, while, for, foreach, declare and catch statements Improvement: [x] Remove lines with just a semicolon (;) [x] Make normal comments (//) from perl comments (#) [x] Make long opening tag (<?php) from short one (<?) Brackets: [x] Space inside brackets- ( ) [x] Space inside empty brackets- ( ) [x] Space inside block brackets- [ ] [x] Space inside empty block brackets- [ ] Tiny var names: often I go through my code and change $var1 to $a, $var2 to $b and so on. I do include comments at the start of the file to show to me what each letter(s) mean.. Final note: So am I doing the right thing with the curly braces and the settings? Are there any great tips that help it run faster?

  Read the article

• Augmenting functionality of subclasses without code duplication in C++

  - by Rob W

  I have to add common functionality to some classes that share the same superclass, preferably without bloating the superclass. The simplified inheritance chain looks like this: Element -> HTMLElement -> HTMLAnchorElement Element -> SVGElement -> SVGAlement The default doSomething() method on Element is no-op by default, but there are some subclasses that need an actual implementation that requires some extra overridden methods and instance members. I cannot put a full implementation of doSomething() in Element because 1) it is only relevant for some of the subclasses, 2) its implementation has a performance impact and 3) it depends on a method that could be overridden by a class in the inheritance chain between the superclass and a subclass, e.g. SVGElement in my example. Especially because of the third point, I wanted to solve the problem using a template class, as follows (it is a kind of decorator for classes): struct Element { virtual void doSomething() {} }; // T should be an instance of Element template<class T> struct AugmentedElement : public T { // doSomething is expensive and uses T virtual void doSomething() override {} // Used by doSomething virtual bool shouldDoSomething() = 0; }; class SVGElement : public Element { /* ... */ }; class SVGAElement : public AugmentedElement<SVGElement> { // some non-trivial check bool shouldDoSomething() { /* ... */ return true; } }; // Similarly for HTMLAElement and others I looked around (in the existing (huge) codebase and on the internet), but didn't find any similar code snippets, let alone an evaluation of the effectiveness and pitfalls of this approach. Is my design the right way to go, or is there a better way to add common functionality to some subclasses of a given superclass?

  Read the article

• Should accessible members of an internal class be internal too?

  - by Jeff Mercado

  I'm designing a set of APIs for some applications I'm working on. I want to keep the code style consistent in all the classes I write but I've found that there are a few inconsistencies that I'm introducing and I don't know what the best way to resolve them is. My example here is specific to C# but this would apply to any language with similar mechanisms. There are a few classes that I need for implementation purposes that I don't necessarily want to expose in the API so I make them internal whereever needed. Generally what I would do is design the class as I normally would (e.g., make members public/protected/private where necessary) and change the visibility level of the class itself to internal. So I might have a few classes that look like this: internal interface IMyItem { ItemSet AddTo(ItemSet set); } internal class _SmallItem : IMyItem { private readonly /* parameters */; public _SmallItem(/* small item parameters */) { /* ... */ } public ItemSet AddTo(ItemSet set) { /* ... */ } } internal abstract class _CompositeItem: IMyItem { private readonly /* parameters */; public _CompositeItem(/* composite item parameters */) { /* ... */ } public abstract object UsefulInformation { get; } protected void HelperMethod(/* parameters */) { /* ... */ } } internal class _BigItem : _CompositeItem { private readonly /* parameters */; public _BigItem(/* big item parameters */) { /* ... */ } public override object UsefulInformation { get { /* ... */ } } public ItemSet AddTo(ItemSet set) { /* ... */ } } In another generated class (part of a parser/scanner), there is a structure that contains fields for all possible values it can represent. The class generated is internal too but I have control over the visibility of the members and decided to make them internal as well. internal partial struct ValueType { internal string String; internal ItemSet ItemSet; internal IMyItem MyItem; } internal class TokenValue { internal static int EQ(ItemSetScanner scanner) { /* ... */ } internal static int NAME(ItemSetScanner scanner, string value) { /* ... */ } internal static int VALUE(ItemSetScanner scanner, string value) { /* ... */ } //... } To me, this feels odd because the first set of classes, I didn't necessarily have to make some members public, they very well could have been made internal. internal members of an internal type can only be accessed internally anyway so why make them public? I just don't like the idea that the way I write my classes has to change drastically (i.e., change all uses of public to internal) just because the class is internal. Any thoughts on what I should do here? It makes sense to me that I might want to make some members of a class declared public, internal. But it's less clear to me when the class is declared internal.

  Read the article

• What is this code?

  - by Aerovistae

  This is from the Evolution of a Programmer "joke", at the "Master Programmer" level. It seems to be C++, but I don't know what all this bloated extra stuff is, nor did any Google searches turn up anything except the joke I took it from. Can anyone tell me more about what I'm reading here? [ uuid(2573F8F4-CFEE-101A-9A9F-00AA00342820) ] library LHello { // bring in the master library importlib("actimp.tlb"); importlib("actexp.tlb"); // bring in my interfaces #include "pshlo.idl" [ uuid(2573F8F5-CFEE-101A-9A9F-00AA00342820) ] cotype THello { interface IHello; interface IPersistFile; }; }; [ exe, uuid(2573F890-CFEE-101A-9A9F-00AA00342820) ] module CHelloLib { // some code related header files importheader(<windows.h>); importheader(<ole2.h>); importheader(<except.hxx>); importheader("pshlo.h"); importheader("shlo.hxx"); importheader("mycls.hxx"); // needed typelibs importlib("actimp.tlb"); importlib("actexp.tlb"); importlib("thlo.tlb"); [ uuid(2573F891-CFEE-101A-9A9F-00AA00342820), aggregatable ] coclass CHello { cotype THello; }; }; #include "ipfix.hxx" extern HANDLE hEvent; class CHello : public CHelloBase { public: IPFIX(CLSID_CHello); CHello(IUnknown *pUnk); ~CHello(); HRESULT __stdcall PrintSz(LPWSTR pwszString); private: static int cObjRef; }; #include <windows.h> #include <ole2.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include "thlo.h" #include "pshlo.h" #include "shlo.hxx" #include "mycls.hxx" int CHello:cObjRef = 0; CHello::CHello(IUnknown *pUnk) : CHelloBase(pUnk) { cObjRef++; return; } HRESULT __stdcall CHello::PrintSz(LPWSTR pwszString) { printf("%ws\n", pwszString); return(ResultFromScode(S_OK)); } CHello::~CHello(void) { // when the object count goes to zero, stop the server cObjRef--; if( cObjRef == 0 ) PulseEvent(hEvent); return; } #include <windows.h> #include <ole2.h> #include "pshlo.h" #include "shlo.hxx" #include "mycls.hxx" HANDLE hEvent; int _cdecl main( int argc, char * argv[] ) { ULONG ulRef; DWORD dwRegistration; CHelloCF *pCF = new CHelloCF(); hEvent = CreateEvent(NULL, FALSE, FALSE, NULL); // Initialize the OLE libraries CoInitiali, NULL); // Initialize the OLE libraries CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_MULTITHREADED); CoRegisterClassObject(CLSID_CHello, pCF, CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER, REGCLS_MULTIPLEUSE, &dwRegistration); // wait on an event to stop WaitForSingleObject(hEvent, INFINITE); // revoke and release the class object CoRevokeClassObject(dwRegistration); ulRef = pCF->Release(); // Tell OLE we are going away. CoUninitialize(); return(0); } extern CLSID CLSID_CHello; extern UUID LIBID_CHelloLib; CLSID CLSID_CHello = { /* 2573F891-CFEE-101A-9A9F-00AA00342820 */ 0x2573F891, 0xCFEE, 0x101A, { 0x9A, 0x9F, 0x00, 0xAA, 0x00, 0x34, 0x28, 0x20 } }; UUID LIBID_CHelloLib = { /* 2573F890-CFEE-101A-9A9F-00AA00342820 */ 0x2573F890, 0xCFEE, 0x101A, { 0x9A, 0x9F, 0x00, 0xAA, 0x00, 0x34, 0x28, 0x20 } }; #include <windows.h> #include <ole2.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <stdio.h> #include "pshlo.h" #include "shlo.hxx" #include "clsid.h" int _cdecl main( int argc, char * argv[] ) { HRESULT hRslt; IHello *pHello; ULONG ulCnt; IMoniker * pmk; WCHAR wcsT[_MAX_PATH]; WCHAR wcsPath[2 * _MAX_PATH]; // get object path wcsPath[0] = '\0'; wcsT[0] = '\0'; if( argc > 1) { mbstowcs(wcsPath, argv[1], strlen(argv[1]) + 1); wcsupr(wcsPath); } else { fprintf(stderr, "Object path must be specified\n"); return(1); } // get print string if(argc > 2) mbstowcs(wcsT, argv[2], strlen(argv[2]) + 1); else wcscpy(wcsT, L"Hello World"); printf("Linking to object %ws\n", wcsPath); printf("Text String %ws\n", wcsT); // Initialize the OLE libraries hRslt = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_MULTITHREADED); if(SUCCEEDED(hRslt)) { hRslt = CreateFileMoniker(wcsPath, &pmk); if(SUCCEEDED(hRslt)) hRslt = BindMoniker(pmk, 0, IID_IHello, (void **)&pHello); if(SUCCEEDED(hRslt)) { // print a string out pHello->PrintSz(wcsT); Sleep(2000); ulCnt = pHello->Release(); } else printf("Failure to connect, status: %lx", hRslt); // Tell OLE we are going away. CoUninitialize(); } return(0); }

  Read the article

• Is there value in having new developers (graduates) start as testers / bug-fixers?

  - by Nico Huysamen

  Hi Programmers Community. What are your thoughts on the following: Is there value in having new developers (graduates) start as testers / bug-fixers? There are two schools of thought here that I have come across. Having new developers (graduates) start as testers / bug-fixers / doing SLA (Service Level Agreement) work, get's them familiar with the code base. It also allows them the opportunity to learn how to read [other people's] code. Further more, by fixing bugs, they will learn certain bad and good practices, which could hopefully help them in the future. The other way of thinking though, is that if you immediately start new developers on something like testing / bug-fixing / SLA work, their appetite for the development world might go away, and/or they might leave the company and you potentially loose out on a great future resource. Is there a balance that should be kept between these two? Currently where I work there is no clear-cut definition of what new starters do. Some go directly on to client work, while some fall in to the SLA world. Should companies have such a policy? Or should it be handled on a case-by-case or opportunity-based basis? Hope to hear from some of you that have experience in this field. Thanks!

  Read the article

• What job is better for a newbie, one that requires you to create a new program frequently, or something like software maintenance?

  - by MobileDev123

  One of my friends has just completed his college degree and is ready to join the programmers' world. Today he has two offers, one with new projects every time, and another with software maintenance. The remaining factors are not important to him, what he wants to know is which option is better? My experience goes with second option because my first job was the maintenance one and I could learn how my fellow programmers made mistakes while coding . But I soon switched to a new job which required me to create new project every time. I enjoyed both but I must admit that my first job has given me a more advantage today. But it's not necessary that my experience can give benefit to him. But I want to know what is general approach? If I have to give him final verdict on these two, what should I tell him? Edit Everybody deserves one up vote here, I am really learning a lot from you guys.

  Read the article

• Question on refactoring and code design

  - by Software Engeneering Learner

  Suppose, I have a class with a constant static final field. Then I want in certain situations that field to be different. It still can be final, because it should be initialized in constructor. My question is, what strategy I should use: add this field value into the constructor create 2 subclasses, replace original field usage with some protected method and override it in subclasses Or create some composite class that will held instance of my class inside and somehow change that value? Which approach should I use and why?

  Read the article

• How to convince my boss that quality is a good thing to have in code?

  - by Kristof Claes

  My boss came to me today to ask me if we could implement a certain feature in 1.5 days. I had a look at it and told him that 2 to 3 days would be more realistic. He then asked me: "And what if we do it quick and dirty?" I asked him to explain what he meant with "quick and dirty". It turns out, he wants us to write code as quickly as humanly possible by (for example) copying bits and pieces from other projects, putting all code in the code-behind of the WebForms pages, stop caring about DRY and SOLID and assuming that the code and functionalities will never ever have to be modified or changed. What's even worse, he doesn't want us do it for just this one feature, but for all the code we write. We can make more profit when we do things quick and dirty. Clients don't want to pay for you taking into account that something might change in the future. The profits for us are in delivering code as quick as possible. As long as the application does what it needs to do, the quality of the code doesn't matter. They never see the code. I have tried to convince him that this is a bad way to think as the manager of a software company, but he just wouldn't listen to my arguments: Developer motivation: I explained that it is hard to keep developers motivated when they are constantly under pressure of unrealistic deadlines and budget to write sloppy code very quickly. Readability: When a project gets passed on to another developer, cleaner and better structured code will be easier to read and understand. Maintainability: It is easier, safer and less time consuming to adapt, extend or change well written code. Testability: It is usually easier to test and find bugs in clean code. My co-workers are as baffled as I am by my boss' standpoint, but we can't seem to get to him. He keeps on saying that by making things more quickly, we can sell more projects, ask a lower price for them while still making a bigger profit. And in the end these projects pay the developer's salaries. What more can I say to make him see he is wrong? I want to buy him copies of Peopleware and The Mythical Man-Month, but I have a feeling they won't change his mind either. A lot of you will probably say something like "Run! Get out of there now!" or "I'd quit!", but that's not really an option since .NET web development jobs are rather rare in the region where I live...

  Read the article

• How to price code reviews to encourage good behavior?

  - by Chris Clark

  I work for a company that has a hosted .net internet application with many clients. Those clients often want to write customizations for our application. We have APIs to hook into the app, but the customizations themselves are written in .net. This is a shared, secure hosting environment and we have to code review these customizations before we can deploy them in our datacenter to ensure that they don't degrade performance, crash our servers, or open any security vulnerabilities. We charge for these code reviews. The current pricing model is simply a function of the number of lines of code. I think this is a bad idea for a variety of reasons, but primarily because, if we are interested in verifying that the code works as expected, we should be incentivizing good, readable code, not compaction. I would like to propose a pricing model that incorporates some, or all of the following as inputs: Lines of code Cyclomatic complexity Avg function length # of functions Are there any other metrics I should incorporate, or other ideas for how we can reasonably create pricing for code reviews that encourages safe and understandable code?

  Read the article

• Can AfferoGPLv3 code be used in GPLv3 code?

  - by Karel Bílek

  Can software with AGPLv3 license be used with GPLv3 project? Can the resulting project be GPLv3, or must it have the special requirements of AGPLv3? I am not very smart from clause 13 of GLPv3 that mentions AGPLv3. Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, you have permission to link or combine any covered work with a work licensed under version 3 of the GNU Affero General Public License into a single combined work, and to convey the resulting work. The terms of this License will continue to apply to the part which is the covered work, but the special requirements of the GNU Affero General Public License, section 13, concerning interaction through a network will apply to the combination as such. Must the resulting, combined work be AGPLv3 or not?

  Read the article

• Chrome "New Tab Page" not showing most frequently visited pages

  - by Ian Boyd

  Google Chrome's*New Tab Page* is not populating the most frequented visted sites grid with anything: It's been sitting like that1 for months. My work machine populates them fine. Edit: Google Chrome Version 4.0.249.892 Edit 2: (Possibly related) Chrome is not storing any history 1i even tried clicking Restore all removed thumbnails 2Updated to 4.0.249.89 just now. Previous build was 78.

  Read the article

• Add a 'New File' button similar to the 'New Folder Button' (Windows 7)

  - by Ramblingwood

  I like how Windows 7 (and Vista) have the convenient 'New Folder' button. Is it possible to have a similar 'New File' button. If it creates a file and then automatically triggers the renaming action so you can rename the file, that would be perfect. I know it is possible for certain file types to have special actions assigned, but not just for a generic directory.

  Read the article

• Where to find my website's source code?

  - by Aamir Berni

  my company ordered a website and we were given all usernames and passwords but I can't find the PHP source files and this is my first website assignment. I have no prior exposure to web technologies although I've been programming for a decade and know computer usage inside out. I tried to use the cPanel to find .php files but there aren't any. There are no MySQL databases either. I'm lost. I'll appreciate any help in this regards.

  Read the article

• Layout of mathematical views (iOS)

  - by William Jockusch

  I am trying to figure out the right way to encapsulate graphical information about mathematical objects. It is not simple. For example, a matrix can include square brackets around its entries, or not. Some things carry down to sub-objects -- for example, a matrix might track the font size to be used by its entries. Similarly, the font color and the background color would carry down to the entries. Other things do not carry down. For example, the entries of the matrix do not need to know whether or not the matrix has those square brackets. Based on all of the above, I need to calculate sizes for everything, then frames. All of this can depend on the properties stored above. The size of a matrix depends on the sizes of its entries, and also on whether or not it has those brackets. What I am having a hard time with is not the individual ways to calculate sensible frames for this or that. It is the overall organizational structure of the whole thing. How can I keep track of it all without going crazy. One particular obstacle is worth mentioning -- for reasons I don't want to go into here, I need to calculate the sizes and frames for everything before I instantiate any actual views. So, for example, if I have a Matrix object, I need to calculate its size before I make a MatrixView. If I have an equation, I need to calculate the size of the view for the equation before I create the actual view. So I clearly need separate objects for those calculations. But I can't figure out a sensible class structure for those objects. If I put them all into a single class, I get some advantages because copying then becomes easy. But I also end up with a bloated class that contains info that is irrelevant for some objects -- such as whether or not to include those brackets around the matrix. But if I use a lot of different classes, copying properties becomes a real pain. If it matters, this is all in Objective C, for an iOS environment. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.

  Read the article

• JavaScript: How to create a new instance of a class without using the new keyword?

  - by Alessandro Vernet

  I think the following code will make the question clear. // My class var Class = function() { console.log("Constructor"); }; Class.prototype = { method: function() { console.log("Method");} } // Creating an instance with new var object1 = new Class(); object1.method(); console.log("New returned", object1); // How to write a factory which can't use the new keyword? function factory(clazz) { // Assume this function can't see "Class", but only sees its parameter "clazz". return clazz.call(); // Calls the constructor, but no new object is created return clazz.new(); // Doesn't work because there is new() method }; var object2 = factory(Class); object2.method(); console.log("Factory returned", object2);

  Read the article

• For those of you who are senior developers what do you look for in a new company and development team?

  - by Amy P

  As I move forward in my career new jobs become more difficult to choose between. When I was starting out and for the first 8 years of my career I took the jobs that I could get that would keep me programming on the general technological path that I was on. I am a job hopper, I only stay with a company for between 2 - 3 years. I think that I do this because after 2 years I get bored and unless there are new projects to keep my busy I no longer find work interesting. Now that I am becoming more experienced it is more important for me to only apply for jobs that are interesting and will move my career and my skill set forward. My problem now is that I keep finding jobs where the projects appear to be interesting during the interview but once I get in the company I find the development environment is sub-par and the development team is disjointed. I feel like I am asking the wrong questions during the interview process and don't know what to look for to make sure that the environment I will be working in will be a good one. Now my question: For those of you who are senior developers what do you look for in a new company and development team? I am looking for the key qualities in a company and development team that you look for when interviewing with a company. These qualities are the ones that would give you hints that the company will be a good one to work for.

  Read the article

• What are some practical uses of the "new" modifier in C# with respect to hiding?

  - by Joel Etherton

  A co-worker and I were looking at the behavior of the new keyword in C# as it applies to the concept of hiding. From the documentation: Use the new modifier to explicitly hide a member inherited from a base class. To hide an inherited member, declare it in the derived class using the same name, and modify it with the new modifier. We've read the documentation, and we understand what it basically does and how it does it. What we couldn't really get a handle on is why you would need to do it in the first place. The modifier has been there since 2003, and we've both been working with .Net for longer than that and it's never come up. When would this behavior be necessary in a practical sense (e.g.: as applied to a business case)? Is this a feature that has outlived its usefulness or is what it does simply uncommon enough in what we do (specifically we do web forms and MVC applications and some small factor WinForms and WPF)? In trying this keyword out and playing with it we found some behaviors that it allows that seem a little hazardous if misused. This sounds a little open-ended, but we're looking for a specific use case that can be applied to a business application that finds this particular tool useful.

  Read the article

• “It’s only test code…”

  - by Chris George

  “Let me hack this in, it’s only test code”, “Don’t worry about getting it reviewed, it’s only test code”, “It doesn’t have to be elegant or efficient, it’s only test code”… do these phrases sound familiar? Chances are if you’ve working with test automation, at one point or other you will have heard these phrases, you have probably even used them yourself! What is certain is that code written under this “it’s only test code” mantra will come back and bite you in the arse! I’ve recently encountered a case where a test was giving a false positive, therefore hiding a real product bug because that test code was very badly written. Firstly it was very difficult to understand what the test was actually trying to achieve let alone how it was doing it, and this complexity masked a simple logic error. These issues are real and they do happen. Let’s take a step back from this and look at what we are trying to do. We are writing test code that tests product code, and we do this to create a suite of tests that will help protect our software against regressions. This test code is making sure that the product behaves as it should by employing some sort of expected result verification. The simple cases of these are generally not a problem. However, automation allows us to explore more complex scenarios in many more permutations. As this complexity increases then so does the complexity of the test code. It is at this point that code which has not been architected properly will cause problems.   Keep your friends close… So, how do we make sure we are doing it right? The development teams I have worked on have always had Test Engineers working very closely with their Software Engineers. This is something that I have always tried to take full advantage of. They are coding experts! So run your ideas past them, ask for advice on how to structure your code, help you design your data structures. This may require a shift in your teams viewpoint, as contrary to this section title and folklore, Software Engineers are not actually the mortal enemy of Test Engineers. As time progresses, and test automation becomes more and more ingrained in what we do, the two roles are converging more than ever. Over the 16 years I have spent as a Test Engineer, I have seen the grey area between the two roles grow significantly larger. This serves to strengthen the relationship and common bond between the two roles which helps to make test code activities so much easier!   Pair for the win Possibly the best thing you could do to write good test code is to pair program on the task. This will serve a few purposes. you will get the benefit of the Software Engineers knowledge and experience the Software Engineer will gain knowledge on the testing process. Sharing the love is a wonderful thing! two pairs of eyes are always better than one… And so are two brains. Between the two of you, I will guarantee you will derive more useful test cases than if it was just one of you.   Code reviews Another policy which certainly pays dividends is the practice of code reviews. By having one of your peers review your code before you commit it serves two purposes. Firstly, it forces you to explain your code. Just the act of doing this will often pick up errors in your code. Secondly, it gets yet another pair of eyes on your code! I cannot stress enough how important code reviews are. The benefits they offer apply as much to product code as test code. In short, Software and Test Engineers should all be doing them! It can be extended even further by getting test code reviewed by a Software Engineer and a Test Engineer, and likewise product code. This serves to keep both functions in the loop with changes going on within your code base.   Learn from your devs I briefly touched on this earlier but I’d like to go into more detail here. Pairing with your Software Engineers when writing your test code is such an amazing opportunity to improve your coding skills. As I sit here writing this article waiting to be called into court for jury service, it reminds me that it takes a lot of patience to be a Test Engineer, almost as much as it takes to be a juror! However tempting it is to go rushing in and start writing your automated tests, resist that urge. Discuss what you want to achieve then talk through the approach you’re going to take. Then code it up together. I find it really enlightening to ask questions like ‘is there a better way to do this?’ Or ‘is this how you would code it?’ The latter question, especially, is where I learn the most. I’ve found that most Software Engineers will be reluctant to show you the ‘right way’ to code something when writing tests because they perceive the ‘right way’ to be too complicated for the Test Engineer (e.g. not mentioning LINQ and instead doing something verbose). So by asking how THEY would code it, it unleashes their true dev-ness and advanced code usually ensues! I would like to point out, however, that you don’t have to accept their method as the final answer. On numerous occasions I have opted for the more simple/verbose solution because I found the code written by the Software Engineer too advanced and therefore I would find it unreadable when I return to the code in a months’ time! Always keep the target audience in mind when writing clever code, and in my case that is mostly Test Engineers.  

  Read the article

• AutoMatically Creating New Sites When New Users Sign Up

  - by Eddy Freeman

  I would like to know how hosted eCommerce sites like www.shopify.com, www.3dCart.com etc.. automatically creates new sites when new users sign up. What kind of tools do they use to create those sites into the users profile. I have tried googling but couldn't find an answer. Does any of you guys have any knowledge or experience that you can share with me? Or do you know a tutorial that you can point me to? I hope my question is clear. Thanks for your help.

  Read the article

• Purpose of "new" keyword

  - by Channel72

  The new keyword in languages like Java, Javascript, and C# creates a new instance of a class. This syntax seems to have been inherited from C++, where new is used specifically to allocate a new instance of a class on the heap, and return a pointer to the new instance. In C++, this is not the only way to construct an object. You can also construct an object on the stack, without using new - and in fact, this way of constructing objects is much more common in C++. So, coming from a C++ background, the new keyword in languages like Java, Javascript, and C# seemed natural and obvious to me. Then I started to learn Python, which doesn't have the new keyword. In Python, an instance is constructed simply by calling the constructor, like: f = Foo() At first, this seemed a bit off to me, until it occurred to me that there's no reason for Python to have new, because everything is an object so there's no need to disambiguate between various constructor syntaxes. But then I thought - what's really the point of new in Java? Why should we say Object o = new Object();? Why not just Object o = Object();? In C++ there's definitely a need for new, since we need to distinguish between allocating on the heap and allocating on the stack, but in Java all objects are constructed on the heap, so why even have the new keyword? The same question could be asked for Javascript. In C#, which I'm much less familiar with, I think new may have some purpose in terms of distinguishing between object types and value types, but I'm not sure. Regardless, it seems to me that many languages which came after C++ simply "inherited" the new keyword - without really needing it. It's almost like a vestigial keyword. We don't seem to need it for any reason, and yet it's there. Question: Am I correct about this? Or is there some compelling reason that new needs to be in C++-inspired memory-managed languages like Java, Javascript and C#?

  Read the article

• When is someone else's code I use from the internet "mine"?

  - by robault

  I'm building a library from methods that I've found on the internet. Some are free to use or modify with no requirements, others say that if I leave a comment in the code it's okay to use, others say when I use the code I have to attribute the use of someone's code in my application (in the credits for my app I guess). What I've been doing is reorganizing classes, renaming methods, adding descriptions (code comments), renaming the parameters and names inside the methods to something meaningful, optimizing loops if applicable, changing return types, adding try/catch/throw blocks, adding parameter checks and cleaning up resources in the methods. For example; I didn't come up with the algorithm for blurring a Bitmap but I've taken the basic example of iterating through the pixels and turned it into a decent library method (applying the aforementioned modifications). I understand how to go about building it now myself but I didn't actually hit the keystrokes to make it and I couldn't have come up with it before learning from their example. What about code people get in answers on Stackoverflow or examples from Codeproject? At what point can I drop their requirements because at n% their code became mine? FWIW I intend on using the libraries to create products that I will sell.

  Read the article

• New AD-DC in a new Site is refusing cross-site IPv4 connections

  - by sysadmin1138

  We just added a new Server 2008 (sp2) Domain Controller in a new Site, our first such config. It's over a VPN gateway WAN (10Mbit). Unfortunately it is displaying a strange network symptom. Connections to the SMB ports (TCP/139 and TCP/445) are being actively refused... if the connection is coming in on pure IPv4. If the incoming connection is coming by way of the 6to4 tunnel those connections establish and work just fine. It isn't the Firewall, since this behavior can be replicated with the firewall turned off. Also, it's actually issuing RST packets to connection attempts; something that only happens with a Windows Firewall if there is a service behind a port and the service itself denies access. I doubt it's some firewall device on the wire, since the server this one replaced was running Samba and access to it from our main network functioned just fine. I'm thinking it might have something to do with the Subnet lists in AD Sites & Services, but I'm not sure. We haven't put any IPv6 addresses in there, just v4, and it's the v4 connections that are being denied. Unfortunately, I can't figure this out. We need to be able to talk to this DC from the main campus. Is there some kind of site-based SMB-level filtering going on? I can talk to the DC's on campus just fine, but that's over that v6 tunnel. I don't have access to a regular machine on that remote subnet, which limits my ability to test.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  | Next Page >