Search Results

Search found 29938 results on 1198 pages for 'version hunter'.

Page 14/1198 | < Previous Page | 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  | Next Page >

  • OpenJDK 7 disponible en version bêta, des voix s'élèvent contre sa licence jugée restrictive

    OpenJDK 7 disponible en version bêta Des voix s'élèvent contre sa licence jugée restrictive Mise à jour du 28/02/2011 par Idelways OpenJDK 7, le Kit de Développement du Java SE 7 est désormais disponible en version bêta (Milestone 12). Les développeurs peuvent dès maintenant télécharger et s'assurer que leurs applications compilent et s'exécutent correctement sous cette version, et se familiariser ainsi avec les nouveautés du langage. La disponibilité générale de ce SDK est prévue dans exactement 5 mois. Mark Reinhold, architecte en chef de la plateforme Java chez Oracle, explique que cette version a passé...

    Read the article

  • Firefox 5 en version finale avec son nouveau kit de développement d'extensions en HTML, JavaScript et CSS, disponible en version Cloud

    Firefox 5 sort en version finale avec son nouveau kit de développement d'extensions En HTML, JavaScript et CSS, disponible aussi en version Cloud Mise à jour du 21/06/2011 par Idelways Firefox 5 est sorti aujourd'hui pour Windows, Linux, Mac OS et Android. Mozilla y finalise enfin quelques grands chantiers prévus initialement pour la version 4. Si cette version semble n'être qu'une mise à jour de Firefox 4, elle n'en est pas moins riche en nouveautés pour les développeurs. Son nouveau SDK (Kit de Développement) permet aux développeurs Web de construire des extensions Firefox complètes en utilisant simplem...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft sort la version 1.4 du SDK de Windows Azure, qui corrige de nombreux bogues de la version précédente

    Microsoft sort la version 1.4 du SDK de Windows Azure, qui corrige de nombreux bogues de la version précédente L'équipe de développement de Windows Azure vient de rendre disponible la nouvelle version de son SDK. Ainsi, Windows Azure SDK 1.4 est téléchargeable et apporte quelques mises à jour. Il corrige notamment quelques problèmes qui se trouvaient dans la version précédente (1.3), parmi lesquels : - correction de l'échec de l'IIS lors de la configuration du fichier web.config en lecture seule - correction des erreurs dans les packs IIS qui les faisaient doubler en taille lorsque packagés - correction du recyclage de la totalité d'un IIS web role quand le diagnotic sto...

    Read the article

  • Upgrading a live 8.04 LTS server to More uptodate version

    - by richardhx
    Running Apache, MySQL, PHP with Moodle 1.9.9 running as a school based CMS. All possible updates for 8.04 have been applied. Moodle 2.x from Versions 2.1 onwards needs Php version 5.3.2 which is included in more recent distribution version. Would I be better (safer) upgrading php & mysql or upgrading Ubuntu to a more recent version? - if upgrading Ubuntu is better, are there any caveats i should know before attempting this. I will be taking a Copy of the entire server before doing any upgrading. Hoping to run on a test version also. Bit green on Linux hence lack of confidence.

    Read the article

  • Sortie de PostgreSQL 9.2 en version finale : performances et extensibilité accrues, flexibilité orientée développeurs

    Le PostgreSQL Global Development Group annonce la sortie de PostgreSQL 9.2, dernière version en date du système de gestion de bases de données libre de référence. Depuis l'annonce de la version bêta en mai, les développeurs et les intégrateurs louent les avancées en terme de performance, de flexibilité et d'extensibilité. Ils s'attendent à une adoption massive de cette version. [IMG]http://scheu.developpez.com/tutoriels/postgresql/log-shipping/images/logo-pgsql.png[/IMG] « PostgreSQL 9.2 intègre le support natif de JSON, les index couvrants, des performances et une réplication encore améliorées, et beaucoup d'autres fonctionnalités. Nous attendons cette version avec impatience. Elle sera disponible en "Early Access" dès sa...

    Read the article

  • jQuery - upgrade from version 1.6.x to 1.7

    - by Renso
    Goal: Issues to consider when upgrading from jQuery version 1.6 to 1.7. This is a short list and may help identify the real issues you need to concern yourself with in stead of reading through all the release notesSummary of issues encountered during upgrade:As you prepare for upgrade to jQuery 1.7 from 1.6.x, this is a quick glimpse of all the issues that are relevant, not sure if it covers all but may be all you need to worry about.Use this method only for checking checkboxes and radio buttons:$("input:checked")http://api.jquery.com/checked-selector/This will work regardless of the version of jQuery you are using. Note that $("input).attr("checked") returns true prior to jQuery 1.6. Only retrieve "real" attributes with "attr", in order versions it would also retrieve properties like "tagName", this no longer works with jQuery 1.6.1+Why does $("input").attr("checked") no longer (from version 1.6.1+) return TRUE or FALSE, because if you look at the HTML (as well as W3C spec) it does not contain a true/false, but the value checked="checked", which is what it should have returned in the first place. $("input").prop("checked") works, return true, because there is in fact a DOM property for "checked" with the value being "true" or "false".Furthermore, if you want to upgrade to jQuery 1.7 you should only have to worry about this for most part:1. isNumeric() is new, be careful as the older version jQuery.isNaN() has been deprecated2. jqXHR success and error have been deprecated3. When rendering content with text(), white space issue cross-browsers: http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/3144Other than the issues above I am not aware of any deprecations you need to worry about.Hope this helps to get everyone up to version 1.7

    Read the article

  • Debian 6.0.6 disponible avec plusieurs correctifs de sécurité pour la version stable

    Debian 6.0.6 disponible avec plusieurs correctifs de sécurité pour la version stable Les développeurs de Debian viennent de publier la sixième mise à jour de la branche stable 6.0 du système d'exploitation basé sur le noyau Linux. Cette version n'apporte pas de nouvelles fonctionnalités à l'OS, mais juste une combinaison de mises à jour déjà publiées pour la distribution, permettant aux utilisateurs d'installer simplement cette version, au lieu de recherche et installer manuellement tous les patchs de sécurité. [IMG]http://rdonfack.developpez.com/images/debian.png[/IMG] Debian 6.0.6 alias « Squeeze » apporte donc plusieurs mises à j...

    Read the article

  • Drupal 7 : la version finale est arrivée avec 800 modules complémentaires compatibles et prêt à l'utilisation

    Drupal 7 : la version finale est arrivée Avec 800 modules complémentaires compatibles et prêt à l'utilisation Mise à jour du 05/01/2011 par Idelways Drupal 7 en version finale et stable est enfin disponible après trois ans de développement, pour le plus grand bonheur des développeurs et intégrateurs Web adeptes de la puissance et de la flexibilité de ce système de gestion de contenus open-source et gratuit. Les développeurs principaux de cette version, épaulés par des milliers de contributeurs, ont axés leurs efforts sur l'amélioration de l'expérience utilisateur L'interface d'administration a subi un lif...

    Read the article

  • 3.2.0-31-generic version doesn't boot

    - by user92526
    12.04 used to work just fine a month ago. Since August, I installed all of the available updates. Since then my mac-pro is acting weird. If I restart the computer, the screen gets stuck in the purple back ground without any texts. Then if I restart again, I can choose what versions of linux I want to run. If I select 3.2.0-31-generic, the machine gets stuck in a state of blinking cursor. If I boot again to run 3.2.0-31-generic recovery mode, the machine gets stuck in a "..... memory freed End of Stack" mode. I can't boot through this kernel. I have to choose an older version of linux like 3.2.0-12-generic to boot into my mac pro, but I have too boot twice to get into this version. I was wondering --if you could provide me a solution to boot the 3.2.0-31-generic version. -- if you could provide me a solution to boot into any version the first time I restart. (Usually I have to kill the first restart) --- If there is an option in linux to choose what version I want to run every time I restart so that I don't have to choose everytime. Thank you

    Read the article

  • ?????????????Oracle Exadata Version 2????

    - by mamoru.kobayashi
    ????????????????????????Oracle Exadata Version 2???????????????? ????????????????????????????????Oracle Exadata Version 2?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Oracle Exadata Version 2?????Oracle Applications??????????????????????? ?????????????????????·??·??·??????????????????????????????????Biz ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????

    Read the article

  • JPA @Version behaviour

    - by Albert Kam
    Hello, im using JPA2 with Hibernate 3.6.x I have made a simple testing on the @Version. Let's say we have 2 entities, Entity Team has a List of Player Entities, bidirectional relationship, lazy fetchtype, cascade-type All Both entities have @Version And here are the scenarios : Whenever a modification is made to one of the team/player entity, the team/player's version will be increased when flushed/commited (version on the modified record is increased). Adding a new player entity to team's collection using persist, the entity the team's version will be assigned after persist (adding a new entity, that new entity will got it's version). Whenever an addition/modification/removal is made to one of the player entity, the team's version will be increased when flushed/commited. (add/modify/remove child record, parent's version got increased also) I can understand the number 1 and 2, but the number 3, i dont understand, why the team's version got increased ? And that makes me think of other questions : What if i got Parent <- child <- granchildren relation ship. Will an addition or modification on the grandchildren increase the version of child and parent ? In scenario number 2, how can i get the version on the team before it's commited, like perhaps by using flush ? Is it a recommended way to get the parent's version after we do something to the child[s] ? Here's a code sample from my experiment, proving that when ReceivingGoodDetail is the owning side, and the version got increased in the ReceivingGood after flushing. Sorry that this use other entities, but ReceivingGood is like the Team, ReceivingGoodDetail is like the Player. 1 ReceivingGood/Team, many ReceivingGoodDetail/Player. /* Hibernate: select receivingg0_.id as id9_14_, receivingg0_.creationDate as creation2_9_14_, .. too long Hibernate: select product0_.id as id0_4_, product0_.creationDate as creation2_0_4_, .. too long before persisting the new detail, version of header is : 14 persisting the detail 1c9f81e1-8a49-4189-83f5-4484508e71a7 printing the size of the header : Hibernate: select details0_.receivinggood_id as receivi13_9_8_, details0_.id as id8_, details0_.id as id10_7_, .. too long 7 after persisting the new detail, version of header is : 14 Hibernate: insert into ReceivingGoodDetail (creationDate, modificationDate, usercreate_id, usermodify_id, version, buyQuantity, buyUnit, internalQuantity, internalUnit, product_id, receivinggood_id, supplierLotNumber, id) values (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?) Hibernate: update ReceivingGood set creationDate=?, modificationDate=?, usercreate_id=?, usermodify_id=?, version=?, purchaseorder_id=?, supplier_id=?, transactionDate=?, transactionNumber=?, transactionType=?, transactionYearMonth=?, warehouse_id=? where id=? and version=? after flushing, version of header is now : 15 */ public void addDetailWithoutTouchingCollection() { String headerId = "3b373f6a-9cd1-4c9c-9d46-240de37f6b0f"; ReceivingGood receivingGood = em.find(ReceivingGood.class, headerId); // create a new detail ReceivingGoodDetail receivingGoodDetailCumi = new ReceivingGoodDetail(); receivingGoodDetailCumi.setBuyUnit("Drum"); receivingGoodDetailCumi.setBuyQuantity(1L); receivingGoodDetailCumi.setInternalUnit("Liter"); receivingGoodDetailCumi.setInternalQuantity(10L); receivingGoodDetailCumi.setProduct(getProduct("b3e83b2c-d27b-4572-bf8d-ac32f6de5eaa")); receivingGoodDetailCumi.setSupplierLotNumber("Supplier Lot 1"); decorateEntity(receivingGoodDetailCumi, getUser("3978fee3-9690-4377-84bd-9fb05928a6fc")); receivingGoodDetailCumi.setReceivingGood(receivingGood); System.out.println("before persisting the new detail, version of header is : " + receivingGood.getVersion()); // persist it System.out.println("persisting the detail " + receivingGoodDetailCumi.getId()); em.persist(receivingGoodDetailCumi); System.out.println("printing the size of the header : "); System.out.println(receivingGood.getDetails().size()); System.out.println("after persisting the new detail, version of header is : " + receivingGood.getVersion()); em.flush(); System.out.println("after flushing, version of header is now : " + receivingGood.getVersion()); }

    Read the article

  • How can one setup a version control system on a local network, without a server?

    - by Andrew
    Edit: Ok so I learned that I guess I need an distributed source control, however are there any UI based ones, and do they allow you to merge with other users on the network? This is kind of a two part question, so here it goes. I want to start developing a web application at home (with multiple developers). However, I don't have a dedicated server nor want to pay for on. So first, I don't know which version control system to use for this case, as at work we mostly have TFS setup, so I am not to familiar with whats out there. What are the best free CVS/SVN tools out there? Second, is it possible to somehow setup the CVS/SVN where there is no dedicated server and both clients store up to one week of the source code from the last check-in? Also, it would be helpful if it could integrate with visual studio, again this isn't that important at all. Problem: There are Five users, one is a Server. Server Connected: All Ok Server Disconnected: No one can share. What I am looking for: No Server: Users still have versioning based on version id of last check-in. Users must check all version on network to make sure they aren't outdated based on their last version id. If not check-in, otherwise merge/get latest. If they are update checkin, and set current version id +1.

    Read the article

  • Python: Best way to check for Python version in program that uses new language features?

    - by Mark Harrison
    If I have a python script that requires at least a particular version of python, what is the correct way to fail gracefully when an earlier version of python is used to launch the script? How do I get control early enough to issue an error message and exit? For example, I have a program that uses the ternery operator (new in 2.5) and "with" blocks (new in 2.6). I wrote a simple little interpreter-version checker routine which is the first thing the script would call ... except it doesn't get that far. Instead, the script fails during python compilation, before my routines are even called. Thus the user of the script sees some very obscure synax error tracebacks - which pretty much require an expert to deduce that it is simply the case of running the wrong version of python. update I know how to check the version of python. The issue is that some syntax is illegal in older versions of python. Consider this program: import sys if sys.version_info < (2, 4): raise "must use python 2.5 or greater" else: # syntax error in 2.4, ok in 2.5 x = 1 if True else 2 print x When run under 2.4, I want this result $ ~/bin/python2.4 tern.py must use python2.5 or greater and not this result: $ ~/bin/python2.4 tern.py File "tern.py", line 5 x = 1 if True else 2 ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax (channeling for a coworker)

    Read the article

  • Delphi 2010: how to stamp file version in *.pas and increment it on each save w/o CVS/SVN tools?

    - by FractalizeR
    Hello. How do I have in each *.pas file it's version, incrementing on each save in some comment line? I have plenty of files on three PCs and I need to have a possibility to quickly check their versions against each other. This problem is easily solved by some centralized version control, but some sources I have cannot be trusted to external servers and are kept on TrueCrypt volumes. May be some addon can do that for me? Something like changing $Version: to $Version: 121212 on each save, incrementing this value? May be there is another way also of solving this problem?

    Read the article

  • How could it happen that version control software emerged so lately?

    - by sharptooth
    According to Wikipedia (the table at the page bottom), the earliest known version control systems were CVS and TeamWare both known from year 1990. How can it be? Software development has been here from at most 1960's and I honestly can't imagine working with codebase without version control. How could it happen that version control software emerged so lately compared to software development?

    Read the article

  • What are the most popular version control softwares and why?

    - by gnucom
    Hey Everyone, I'm an employee at a small company that is going to be launching a version control system soon and I'm trying to consider which software would best serve this company for version control. I wanted to get as many opinions as possible. Right now, I'm experimenting with Trac and Indefero running atop a SVN server. So my question is, what is the most popular/favorite version control software and why? ??t??!

    Read the article

  • Trying to find a duplicate version of PHP on my system. Where is it?

    - by macek
    I have having a helluva time trying to track down which php binary my apache is using. locate bin/php returns this list /usr/bin/php /usr/bin/php-cgi /usr/bin/php-config /usr/bin/phpize /usr/local/bin/php /usr/local/bin/php-cgi /usr/local/bin/php-config /usr/local/bin/php-shell.sh /usr/local/bin/phpize Let's see the versions: /usr/bin/php -v shows 5.3.2 /usr/bin/local/php -v shows 5.3.2 What about which? [macek ~]$ which php /usr/bin/php The problem phpinfo(); when executed by apache shows 5.2.11 Where is this phantom 5.2.11 on my system?

    Read the article

  • What is a good set and forget file version tracking / backup application for windows?

    - by tomwoods
    When I make changes to files, I keep on finding myself "saving as" and adding the current date to the file. It slows me down, and it creates a bunch of files that clot my folder. I would prefer to be able to Right Click on a file from the File Explorer and select to save different versions of this file, so that each time I save it, it saves a copy somewhere, that I can access in the future if necessary. Is there any application that achieves this?

    Read the article

  • Run Your Tests With Any NUnit Version

    - by Alois Kraus
    I always thought that the NUnit test runners and the test assemblies need to reference the same NUnit.Framework version. I wanted to be able to run my test assemblies with the newest GUI runner (currently 2.5.3). Ok so all I need to do is to reference both NUnit versions the newest one and the official for the current project. There is a nice article form Kent Bogart online how to reference the same assembly multiple times with different versions. The magic works by referencing one NUnit assembly with an alias which does prefix all types inside it. Then I could decorate my tests with the TestFixture and Test attribute from both NUnit versions and everything worked fine except that this was ugly. After playing a little bit around to make it simpler I found that I did not need to reference both NUnit.Framework assemblies. The test runners do not require the TestFixture and Test attribute in their specific version. That is really neat since the test runners are instructed by attributes what to do in a declarative way there is really no need to tie the runners to a specific version. At its core NUnit has this little method hidden to find matching TestFixtures and Tests   public bool CanBuildFrom(Type type) {     if (!(!type.IsAbstract || type.IsSealed))     {         return false;     }     return (((Reflect.HasAttribute(type,           "NUnit.Framework.TestFixtureAttribute", true) ||               Reflect.HasMethodWithAttribute(type, "NUnit.Framework.TestAttribute"       , true)) ||               Reflect.HasMethodWithAttribute(type, "NUnit.Framework.TestCaseAttribute"   , true)) ||               Reflect.HasMethodWithAttribute(type, "NUnit.Framework.TheoryAttribute"     , true)); } That is versioning and backwards compatibility at its best. I tell NUnit what to do by decorating my tests classes with NUnit Attributes and the runner executes my intent without the need to bind me to a specific version. The contract between NUnit versions is actually a bit more complex (think of AssertExceptions) but this is also handled nicely by using not the concrete type but simply to check for the catched exception type by string. What can we learn from this? Versioning can be easy if the contract is small and the users of your library use it in a declarative way (Attributes). Everything beyond it will force you to reference several versions of the same assembly with all its consequences. Type equality is lost between versions so none of your casts will work. That means that you cannot simply use IBigInterface in two versions. You will need a wrapper to call the correct versioned one. To get out of this mess you can use one (and only one) version agnostic driver to encapsulate your business logic from the concrete versions. This is of course more work but as NUnit shows it can be easy. Simplicity is therefore not a nice thing to have but also requirement number one if you intend to make things more complex in version two and want to support any version (older and newer). Any interaction model above easy will not be maintainable. There are different approached to versioning. Below are my own personal observations how versioning works within the  .NET Framwork and NUnit.   Versioning Models 1. Bug Fixing and New Isolated Features When you only need to fix bugs there is no need to break anything. This is especially true when you have a big API surface. Microsoft did this with the .NET Framework 3.0 which did leave the CLR as is but delivered new assemblies for the features WPF, WCF and Windows Workflow Foundations. Their basic model was that the .NET 2.0 assemblies were declared as red assemblies which must not change (well mostly but each change was carefully reviewed to minimize the risk of breaking changes as much as possible) whereas the new green assemblies of .NET 3,3.5 did not have such obligations since they did implement new unrelated features which did not have any impact on the red assemblies. This is versioning strategy aimed at maximum compatibility and the delivery of new unrelated features. If you have a big API surface you should strive hard to do the same or you will break your customers code with every release. 2. New Breaking Features There are times when really new things need to be added to an existing product. The .NET Framework 4.0 did change the CLR in many ways which caused subtle different behavior although the API´s remained largely unchanged. Sometimes it is possible to simply recompile an application to make it work (e.g. changed method signature void Func() –> bool Func()) but behavioral changes need much more thought and cannot be automated. To minimize the impact .NET 2.0,3.0,3.5 applications will not automatically use the .NET 4.0 runtime when installed but they will keep using the “old” one. What is interesting is that a side by side execution model of both CLR versions (2 and 4) within one process is possible. Key to success was total isolation. You will have 2 GCs, 2 JIT compilers, 2 finalizer threads within one process. The two .NET runtimes cannot talk  (except via the usual IPC mechanisms) to each other. Both runtimes share nothing and run independently within the same process. This enables Explorer plugins written for the CLR 2.0 to work even when a CLR 4 plugin is already running inside the Explorer process. The price for isolation is an increased memory footprint because everything is loaded and running two times.   3. New Non Breaking Features It really depends where you break things. NUnit has evolved and many different Assert, Expect… methods have been added. These changes are all localized in the NUnit.Framework assembly which can be easily extended. As long as the test execution contract (TestFixture, Test, AssertException) remains stable it is possible to write test executors which can run tests written for NUnit 10 because the execution contract has not changed. It is possible to write software which executes other components in a version independent way but this is only feasible if the interaction model is relatively simple.   Versioning software is hard and it looks like it will remain hard since you suddenly work in a severely constrained environment when you try to innovate and to keep everything backwards compatible at the same time. These are contradicting goals and do not play well together. The easiest way out of this is to carefully watch what your customers are doing with your software. Minimizing the impact is much easier when you do not need to guess how many people will be broken when this or that is removed.

    Read the article

  • How do you achieve a numeric versioning scheme with Git?

    - by Erlend
    My organization is considering moving from SVN to Git. One argument against moving is as follows: How do we do versioning? We have an SDK distribution based on the NetBeans Platform. As the svn revisions are simple numbers we can use them to extend the version numbers of our plugins and SDK builds. How do we handle this when we move to Git? Possible solutions: Using the build number from hudson (Problem: you have to check hudson to correlate that to an actual git version) Manually upping the version for nightly and stable (Problem: Learning curve, human error) If someone else has encountered a similar problem and solved it, we'd love to hear how.

    Read the article

  • How should I set up UDK with Git and CruiseControl?

    - by Martin Sojka
    For a new project in UDK, I'd like to set up a Git repository for version control and a CruiseControl.NET-based continuous integration solution. The good news is that he first part seems easy enough and CruiseControl.NET can work off Git repositories. The bad news is that according to my searches, nobody has ever tried to do this. Ideally, I'm looking for a step-by-step guide on how to set up such a development environment assuming more than one development computer, one central repository for the "master" branch, and one machine for building and packaging the binaries via CruiseControl.NET. Related: Version control system for game development with UDK? Options for UDK and version control repositories? CruiseControl.NET and Git

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  | Next Page >