Search Results

Search found 5623 results on 225 pages for 'prevent deletion'.

Page 141/225 | < Previous Page | 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148  | Next Page >

  • mkmapview userlocation annimation issue

    - by Gedeon
    I have issue with userlocation in mkmapview. The thing is that i have navigation controller which pushes mapview , as soon as it pushes it userlocation is queried. But if user pop mapview view before userlocation animation is finished , it throws exception because animation is trying to access deallocated mapview instance. So my question is , how to prevent that. I could do it by disabling back button , but i am not sure if that right way to take. Does anybody know how to stop current animation?

    Read the article

  • Memory leak in WPF app due to DelegateCommand.

    - by Abdullah BaMusa
    I just finished desktop apps written in WPF and c# using MVVM pattern. In this app I used Delegate Command implementation to wrap the ICommands properties exposed in my ModelView. The problem is these DelegateCommands prevent my ModelView and View from being garbage collected after closing the view. So it stays larking until I terminate the whole application. I profile the application I find it’s all about delegatecommand that keeping the modelview in memory. How could I avoid this situation and is this in nature of mvvm pattern, or it’s about my implantation of the pattern?. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Limiting landscape views in UITabBarController containing UINavigationController

    - by Spider-Paddy
    I have a tab bar application that contains navigation views in 2 of its tabs. I would like 1 view in the 1 navigation controller to allow landscape view but because of the nav bar in tab bar limitation I now have to allow landscape views for every single view in my app to make the tilt messages get passed to my app which I don't want. I thought perhaps, on the views which shouldn't go to landscape, that there might be ways to either: prevent the view change e.g. calling setOrientation:UIDeviceOrientationPortrait whenever the device goes landscape or giving the illusion that the view doesn't change e.g. presenting a modal portrait view over the rotated view Anybody have any ideas or experience that they care to share? What is the best approach here? (I don't want to now have to design a landscape view for every view just to so that I can display a portrait & landscape view for 1 view)

    Read the article

  • Getting XML parse error in coldfusion. Can the packet returned be validated?

    - by jeff
    Getting an error on occasion on a specific CF page. Offending code listed below. Very odd because when I rebooted CF it went away. Can the XML be checked via XMLValidate to prevent this from happening? Is this some sort of CF bug since the error disappeared after reboot of CF? I have a feeling that the error will resurface at some point. An error occured while Parsing an XML document. The element type "meta" must be terminated by the matching end-tag "". <cfhttp method="get" url="http://bs.mysite.com/webservice/rec/get.sbs?customerId=345S4BE8x&itemId=#product_id#&number=20&ruleId=#product.location_tab_accessories#"> <cfset result = xmlParse(cfhttp.FileContent)> <cfset recs = xmlSearch(result, "/result/thsite/site/itemId")>

    Read the article

  • how to stop generating code on a particular button?

    - by coure06
    I am trying to create an input button for my own use in my web-application thats using jquery framework. But when I see the html code in browser, the framework is generating some wrapper code around that input, how to prevent that code to be not generated? my code: <input type="button" value="off" class="toggle-btn" id="toggle-btn1" /> Generated output: <div data-theme="c" class="ui-btn ui-btn-corner-all ui-shadow ui-btn-up-c"> <span class="ui-btn-inner ui-btn-corner-all"> <span class="ui-btn-text">off</span> </span> <input type="button" id="toggle-btn1" class="toggle-btn ui-btn-hidden" value="off"> </div>

    Read the article

  • Servlet Filters and the OSGi HttpService

    - by wrumsby
    I'm working on an OSGi-based application that uses org.osgi.service.http.HttpService which does not support the use of Servlet Filters. Before I realised that I wouldn't be able to use Servlet Filters I was planning to apply a couple of existing Filters. These Filters set the appropriate HTTP headers to: prevent caching of responses control rendering in IE8 with the X-UA-Compatible header What are my options here? I don't want to use meta elements to control caching since that technique is unreliable. Using a meta element to set the X-UA-Compatible header is probably acceptable, but I'd still be interested in alternative approaches.

    Read the article

  • treeview and postback

    - by Luis
    hi I have a treeview, and already the javascript code to postback the page. Because when i select the father , auto-select the children. this is my html code <script> function foo() { var o = window.event.srcElement; if (o.tagName == "INPUT" && o.type == "checkbox") { __doPostBack("",""); } } </script> <asp:TreeView ID="HierarchicalTreeView" runat="server" OnSelectedNodeChanged="HierarchicalTreeView_SelectedNodeChanged" ShowLines="True" ExpandImageToolTip="Fechar &quot;{0}&quot;" CollapseImageToolTip="Fechar &quot;{0}&quot;" ExpandDepth="1" OnTreeNodeCheckChanged="HierarchicalTreeView_TreeNodeCheckChanged" EnableClientScripts="true" onClick="foo()"> <NodeStyle CssClass="text" /> <SelectedNodeStyle CssClass="text" Font-Bold="true" /> </asp:TreeView> How can i prevent from postback all page, and only the treeview???, so dont 'refresh' the page

    Read the article

  • programmatically logout a "specific" user

    - by MD_Oppenheimer
    Is it possible in Asp.NET MVC to proframmatically logout a user? I am aware that you can use: FormsService.SignOut(); But this refers to the context of the webpage making the request. I'm trying to prevent a user logging in twice. So if I call: MembershipUser membershipUser = Membership.GetUser(userName); if (membershipUser.IsOnline == true) { // log this user out so we can log them in again FormsService.SignOut(); } calling: FormsService.SignOut(); has no bearing on the context of the user say, with another webbrowser who is logged in already??

    Read the article

  • Custom broadcast events in AS3?

    - by Ender
    In Actionscript 3, most events use the capture/target/bubble model, which is pretty popular nowadays: When an event occurs, it moves through the three phases of the event flow: the capture phase, which flows from the top of the display list hierarchy to the node just before the target node; the target phase, which comprises the target node; and the bubbling phase, which flows from the node subsequent to the target node back up the display list hierarchy. However, some events, such as the Sprite class's enterFrame event, do not capture OR bubble - you must subscribe directly to the target to detect the event. The documentation refers to these as "broadcast events." I assume this is for performance reasons, since these events will be triggered constantly for each sprite on stage and you don't want to have to deal with all that superfluous event propagation. I want to dispatch my own broadcast events. I know you can prevent an event from bubbling (Event.bubbles = false), but can you get rid of capture as well?

    Read the article

  • Logoff button IIS6 ASP.NET Basic Authentication

    - by willyconnor
    I have a requirement for an explicit logout button for users in a ASP.NET web app. I am using IIS6 with Basic Authentication (SSL). I can redirect to another web page but the browser keeps the session alive. I have googled around and found a way to do it by enabling an active x control to communicate with IIS and kill the session. I am in a restricted environment that does not allow forms authentication and active x controls are not forbidden as well. Has anyone else had this requirement and how have you handled it? Okay that is what I was afraid of. I have seen similar answers on the net and I was hoping someone would have a way of doing it. Thanks for your time though. I guess I can use javascript to prevent the back button like the history.back()

    Read the article

  • Visual Studio "Find" results in "No files were found to look in. Find stopped progress."

    - by suryasonti
    Sometimes while developing in Visual Studio IDE, when you use "Find in Files" dialog to find something, the search fails and you will see the following message in the "Find Results" window. "No files were found to look in. Find stopped progress." Once this message shows-up all the subsequent searches will result in the same message. Nothing fixes the problem including restarting computer except Pressing "Ctrl + ScrLk". Does anyone know what causes VisualStudio to get into this state and is there a setting to permanently prevent it from happening?

    Read the article

  • Flex - How to call a webservice without crossdomain.xml file

    - by Stephane Grenier
    How can I consume a webservice that hasn't explicitely created a crossdomain.xml? I understand it's for security and to prevent cross-site scripting, but it does seem like a major limitation to the Flex framework. For example, if I want to consume a webservice, which is suppose to be language agnostic, then I can't with Flex. The webservice/server has to be specifically prepared for Flex/Flash. If it's not, then it cannot be consumed. That can't be right can it?

    Read the article

  • Secure ajax form POST

    - by user194630
    I was wondering how to develop a secure form post through AJAX. For example, i have: My HTML form. My JavaScript handling the submit. The submit url is "post_data.php" The posted data is: id=8&name=Denis The PHP verifies if variables id and name are POSTED and their data type. If this is ok it proceed to do some stuff on a database. My question is, how can i prevent someone from creating his own html form, outside my web site, or whatever, and posting false data to my PHP script? Imagine that data realy exists on my database, this could be bad. Thanks

    Read the article

  • An item with the same key has already been added.

    - by senzacionale
    Can someone advice me how to prevent this error. An item with the same key has already been added.? // Failed to find a matching SessionFactory so make a new one. if (sessionFactory == null) { Check.Require(File.Exists(sessionFactoryConfigPath), "The config file at '" + sessionFactoryConfigPath + "' could not be found"); Configuration cfg = new Configuration(); cfg.Configure(sessionFactoryConfigPath); /*MINE*/ var persistenceModel = new PersistenceModel(); persistenceModel.AddMappingsFromAssembly(Assembly.Load("EMedicine.Core")); persistenceModel.Configure(cfg); /*END_OF_MINE*/ // Now that we have our Configuration object, create a new SessionFactory sessionFactory = cfg.BuildSessionFactory(); if (sessionFactory == null) { throw new InvalidOperationException("cfg.BuildSessionFactory() returned null."); } if (sessionFactoryConfigPath != null) sessionFactories.Add(sessionFactoryConfigPath, sessionFactory); } Error is here: sessionFactory = cfg.BuildSessionFactory();

    Read the article

  • Java - Difference between SwingWorker and SwingUtilities.invokeLater()

    - by Yatendra Goel
    SwingWorker is used for the following purposes: For running long-running tasks in a different thread so as to prevent the GUI from being unresponsive For updating GUI with the results produced by the long-running task at the end of the task through done() method. For updating GUI from time to time with the intermediate results produced and published by the task with the help of publish() and process() methods. SwingUtilities.invokeLater() can perform the above tasks as follows: Instead of executing SwingWorker.execute() method from the EDT, we can execute ExecutorService.submit(new MyRunnable()) as it will also create another thread which can execute long-running task. For updating GUI at the end of the task, we can put code (written in done() method of case1) SwingUtilites.invokeLater(new RunnableToExecuteDoneMethodCode()) at the end of the task. For updating GUI in the middle of the task, we can put code (written in process() method of case1) SwingUtilites.invokeLater(new RunnableToExecuteProcessMethodCode()) at the place where we called publish() method in case1. I am asking this question because the problem specified in question http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2797483/java-swingworker-can-we-call-one-swingworker-from-other-swingworker-instead-o/2824306#2824306 can be solved by SwingUtilities.invokeLater() but can't be solved with SwingWorker

    Read the article

  • Asynchronous Processing = Spanning Threads = Valid?

    - by jens
    Hello Experts, am I allowed (without any sideeffects) to create and start a new Thread() from within a doGet() Method of a servlet? Or does this somehow leak ressources? Is it valid to also pass the "Session" Object into the Thread to later save the result of my asynchronous processing (I will synchronized correctly) in the session? Or will this leak ressources when using the session "in indepedant threads"? = What would happen if the session meanwhile would be expired by the webcontainer as it has timedout and I will access it from my thread? Or would could this also lead to the sideffect, that storing the session in the thread will prevent the webcontainer from expiring the session at all (and therefore finally leak ressources as the sessions do not get cleared up)? (I know there are other Solutions, like working with DB-(Job)Records, JMS or Servlets 3.0) but I need so solve the problem as described by spanning a new Thread within doGet.) Thank you very much!! Jens

    Read the article

  • Preventing mouse emulation events (ie click) from touch events in Mobile Safari / iPhone using Javas

    - by Jaime Cham
    In doing a single page Javascript app with interactive DOM elements I've found that the "mouseover-mousemove-mousedown-mouseup-click" sequence happens all in a bunch after the "touchstart-touchmove-touchend" sequence of events. I've also found that it is possible to prevent the "mouse*-click" events from happening by doing an "event.preventDefault()" during the touchstart event, but only then, and not during the touchmove and touchend. This is a strange design, because because it is not possible to know during the touchstart yet whether the user intents to drag or swipe or just tap/click on the item. I ended up setting up a "ignore_next_click" flag somewhere tied to a timestamp, but this is obviously not very clean. Does anybody know of a better way of doing this, or are we missing something? Note that while a "click" can be recognized as a "touchstart-touchend" sequence (ie no "touchmove"), there are certain things, such as keyboard input focus, that can only happen during a proper click event.

    Read the article

  • C++ find method is not const?

    - by Rachel
    I've written a method that I'd like to declare as const, but the compiler complains. I traced through and found that this part of the method was causing the difficulty: bool ClassA::MethodA(int x) { bool y = false; if(find(myList.begin(), myList.end(), x) != myList.end()) { y = true; } return y; } There is more happening in the method than that, but with everything else stripped away, this was the part that didn't allow the method to be const. Why does the stl find algorithm prevent the method from being const? Does it change the list in any way?

    Read the article

  • IIS7 permit access only to local network

    - by user335518
    Hi, I am having a problem with the IIS 7 on a Win 2008 server. I only want to have access to it inside my network and denied access from anyone outside the network. I had created a rule to permit access to the group of computers with the IP: 192.168.0.1 (255.255.255.0). In the IIS6 this was enougth to prevent access of any IP that don't belong to the network. Any idea of how can I block these access? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • C#, WinForms: Why aren't KeyDown events chaining up to Form? I have to add event handler to each chi

    - by blak3r
    As i understand it, when a button is pressed it should first invoke the Control which has focus' KeyDown Handler, then it call the KeyDown handler for any Parent controls, all the way up to the main form. The only thing that would stop the chain would be if somewhere along the chain one of the EventHandlers did: e.SuppressKeyPress = true; e.Handled = true; In my case, KeyDown events never get to the main form. I have Form - Panel - button for example. Panel doesn't offer a KeyDown Event, but it shouldn't stop it from reaching the main form right? Right now as a work around I set every single control to call an event handler I wrote. I'm basically trying to prevent Alt-F4 from closing the application and instead minimize it.

    Read the article

  • Javascript Bookmarklet fails in IE8

    - by songdogtech
    Anyone want to take a stab at why this bookmarklet fails in IE8? It turns all text uppercase in Friefox and Safari. But in IE8, it simply stalls with "loading..." I've enabled scriplets and the security settings in IE8. Update 3/13/10: I've discovered that IE limits the data length of Favorites, so I need to find a work around to prevent IE from truncating the bookmarklet. javascript: (function(){ var i,t,D=document; for(i=0;t=D.getElementsByTagName('textarea')[i];++i) t.value=t.value.toUpperCase(); var newSS,styles='*{text-transform:uppercase}input,textarea{text-transform:none}'; if(D.createStyleSheet){ D.createStyleSheet("javascript:'"+styles+"'"); } else{ newSS=D.createElement('link'); newSS.rel='stylesheet'; newSS.href='data:text/css,'+escape(styles); D.documentElement.childNodes[0].appendChild(newSS); } } )()

    Read the article

  • What makes MVVM uniquely suited to WPF?

    - by Reed Copsey
    The Model-View-ViewModel is very popular with WPF and Silverlight. I've been using this for my most recent projects, and am a very large fan. I understand that it's a refinement of MVP. However, I am wondering exactly what unique characteristics of WPF (and Silverlight) allow MVVM to work, and prevent (or at least make difficult) this pattern from working using other frameworks or technologies. I know MVVM has a strong dependency on the powerful data binding technology within WPF. This is the one feature which many articles and blogs seem to mention as being the key to WPF providing the means of the strong separation of View from ViewModel. However, data binding exists in many forms in other UI frameworks. There are even projects like Truss that provide WPF-style databinding to POCO in .NET. What features, other than data binding, make WPF and Silverlight uniquely suited to Model-View-ViewModel?

    Read the article

  • WIX: COM unregistration when removing one of two programs

    - by madbadger
    Hello, I am relatively new to WiX. It is a great tool, but I still need some time to learn it better. I have encountered a problem with registration and unregistration of a COM component. I have created installers for two applications, lets call them A and B. Both are using the same COM component. I have used the heat tool, as recommended. When installing A or B, the component is registered without any problems. But when I install A and B, then remove A (with Add/Remove programs) the COM class gets unregistered and B cannot use it anymore. Is there a clean solution to prevent this from happening? I would like to unregister the COM when BOTH A and B are uninstalled. Any help would be appreciated, Best regards, madbadger

    Read the article

  • Removing the contents of a Chan or MVar in a single discrete step

    - by Bill
    I'm writing a discrete simulation where request values from multiple threads accumulate in a centralized queue. Every n milliseconds, a manager wakes up to process requests. When the manager wakes up, it should retrieve all of the contents of the central queue in a single discrete step. While processing these, any client threads attempting to submit to the queue should block. When processing completes, the queue reopens and the manager goes back to sleep. What's the best way to do this? The retry behavior of STM isn't really what I want. If I use a Chan or MVar, there's no way to prevent clients from enqueuing additional requests during processing. One approach is to use an MVar as a mutex on a Chan holding the queue. Are there other ways to do this?

    Read the article

  • What happens if two COM classes each without a threading model are implemented in one in-proc COM se

    - by sharptooth
    Consider a situation. I have an in-proc COM server that contains two COM classes. Both classes are marked as "no threading model" in the registry - the "ThreadingModel" value is just absent. Both classes read/write the same set of global variable without any synchronization. As far as I know "no threading model" will enforce COM to disallow concurrent access to the same or different instances of the same class by different threads. Will COM prevent concurrent access to instances of the two abovementioned different classes? Do I need synchronization when accessing the global variables from two different COM classes in this situation?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148  | Next Page >