Search Results

Search found 19671 results on 787 pages for 'internet'.

Page 142/787 | < Previous Page | 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149  | Next Page >

  • IE7 and 8 Hangs Randomly on CSS Images

    - by BJ Safdie
    We have an ASP.NET 3.5 application that has been in production for over a year. Our last release was a couple of months ago. We use CSS for styling and application of background images to divs and such. The server is Windows 2003 with IIS. Suddenly, this week, we have had reports from some users that the page seems to hang up while loading. The status bar was showing the name of a background image used in the page main area (assigned in CSS). At our office, some of us could recreate the problem, while others could not. IE6 and Firefox do not seem to be affected, only IE7/8. Running Fiddler on an affected machine and trying to see what was happening with the requests seemed to make the problem go away (while running through Fiddler, it returned when not). Hitting Refresh on a hung load often made the page load just fine. I checked the background image, and even replaced it with an archived copy. No joy. We re-deployed the app from our production source. No Joy. We restarted IIS and eventually rebooted the whole server. There are no unusual entries in the event logs, the app logs or the IIS logs. Finally, I removed the image entirely and re-styled the page not to use a background image. That solved the problem at least for now. However, we have reports of other images "hanging." The images are PNGs, but I have heard some rumors that sometimes a GIF hangs, but I have no screenshot to confirm. This just started happening "out of the blue." There have been no releases or updates applied to the server recently. We even checked updates on clients to see if a recent Windows Update might have caused this on the client, but there was nothing updated within the last couple of weeks. If you have any information about this problem, I would love to hear from you. I would also greatly appreciate any recommendations on additional diagnostics we can try.

    Read the article

  • Select dropdown with fixed width cutting off content in IE

    - by aaandre
    The issue: Some of the items in the select require more than the specified width of 145px in order to display fully. Firefox behavior: clicking on the select reveals the dropdown elements list adjusted to the width of the longest element. IE6 & IE7 behavior: clicking on the select reveals the dropdown elements list restricted to 145px width making it impossible to read the longer elements. The current UI requires us to fit this dropdown in 145px and have it host items with longer descriptions. Any advise on resolving the issue with IE? The top element should remain 145px wide even when the list is expanded. Thank you! The css: select.center_pull { background:#eeeeee none repeat scroll 0 0; border:1px solid #7E7E7E; color:#333333; font-size:12px; margin-bottom:4px; margin-right:4px; margin-top:4px; width:145px; } Here's the select input code (there's no definition for the backend_dropbox style at this time) <select id="select_1" class="center_pull backend_dropbox" name="select_1"> <option value="-1" selected="selected">Browse options</option> <option value="-1">------------------------------------</option> <option value="224">Option 1</option> <option value="234">Longer title for option 2</option> <option value="242">Very long and extensively descriptive title for option 3</option> </select> Full html page in case you want to quickly test in a browser: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <title>dropdown test</title> <style type="text/css"> <!-- select.center_pull { background:#eeeeee none repeat scroll 0 0; border:1px solid #7E7E7E; color:#333333; font-size:12px; margin-bottom:4px; margin-right:4px; margin-top:4px; width:145px; } --> </style> </head> <body> <p>Select width test</p> <form id="form1" name="form1" method="post" action=""> <select id="select_1" class="center_pull backend_dropbox" name="select_1"> <option value="-1" selected="selected">Browse options</option> <option value="-1">------------------------------------</option> <option value="224">Option 1</option> <option value="234">Longer title for option 2</option> <option value="242">Very long and extensively descriptive title for option 3</option> </select> </form> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • IE - hidden radio button not checked when the corresponding label is clicked

    - by ScottE
    I just noticed a strange behaviour in IE7. I have radio buttons with associated labels as follows: <input type="radio" name="filter" id="filter_1" value="Activities" checked="checked" /> <label for="filter_1">Activities</label> <input type="radio" name="filter" id="filter_2" value="Services" /> <label for="filter_2">Services</label> The radio button is hidden via css with display:none or visibility: hidden (don't ask) The problem is - when I click the label in IE7 (haven't looked at other IE versions yet) the associated radio button is not actually checked. I confirmed this with jquery - the label click event is fired, but the radio button click event is not. A form post also confirms that the checked radio button does not change. This works correctly in firefox, and also works correctly if I remove the CSS that hides the radio buttons. Is this an IE bug or am I missing something?

    Read the article

  • Is there any possibility of rendering differences betweeen firefox 3 and 3.5 and IE 7 and 8, even if

    - by metal-gear-solid
    I'm making a site for European client and he said Firefox 3 and IE 7 and 8 has more user than others browser for desktop in Europe http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-eu-monthly-200812-201001-bar I've only IE 7 and Firefox 3.5.7 installed in my PC. Should I download portable Firefox 3.0 and test in it too even if I'm not using any new css property/selector which only has support in Firefox 3.5 or testing in 3.5.7 would be enough? And for IE testing in IE 7 would be enough or should i check my site in IE8 (downloading VPC image of IE8 and testing in VM) even if I'm not using any new css property/selector which only has support in IE8? Or is it necessary to use <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=EmulateIE7" /> in <head> ? But what will happen when user will switch compatibility mode to IE 8 default rendering mode? Can we make site compatible in IE 7 and 8 both without using <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=EmulateIE7" />? If yes, then what special we need to do.care/consider in css to make site identical in both?

    Read the article

  • browser showing half progress bar even after page is fully rendered

    - by Rama
    Hi, what could be the reason if browser is showing progress bar (stuck at half) as if it is still trying to load something, even after the page is rendered. this is an intranet ASP.NET website. how can I find out the reason? the browser is IE8. actually this started after the browser is upgraded from IE6 to IE8. not sure if this issue has anything to do with browser upgrade. will the tools like Fiddler can help to find out what it is still trying to load? thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Background image fixed with vertical scroll bar in IE

    - by Rich
    I have a gradient background image in my web application, it goes from dark at the top to light at the bottom. In Firefox, this image is handled properly, where upon scrolling vertically downwards on the page, the dark top section disappears. However, when I started testing in IE (I'm using IE8) the background image stays fixed behind the screen as you vertically scroll, meaning the dark top section of the background image is always rendered at the top of the IE view. I've set the background tag to have scroll defined, which from all I can tell should solve the problem, but IE is not happy. background: #470077 url( images/abcd.jpg ) repeat-x scroll; I made sure to be clearing the data in IE in case it was caching the old style before I added scroll. Textual representation of issue (x = darkest, o = dark, _ = light, - = lightest) Firefox: top of page xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx oooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo ___________________________ ___________________________ scrolled down a bit oooooooooooooooooooooooo ___________________________ ___________________________ -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- IE: top of page xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx oooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo ___________________________ ___________________________ scrolled down a bit xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx oooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooooooooooo ___________________________ ___________________________

    Read the article

  • To not iterate through function of Array object if it is added to Array prototype

    - by Rishat Muhametshin
    According to the way to add indexOf method to Array class in IE6, how do I now reject this method from iterating through any random array? For example: Array.prototype.indexOf = function(needle) { ... }; var array = [1, 2, 3]; for (var i in array) { document.write(i + ': ' + array[i]); } gives output 0: 1 1: 2 2: 3 indexOf: function ... How can I skip indexOf property and stop iterating on it without adding any code to where for(...) is called?

    Read the article

  • what is the best developre toolbar for IE?

    - by hd
    i use 'FireBug' extension of FF to debug designed webpages and installed 'IE Developer Toolbar' for IE to get this purpose, but it is not as well as FireBug. it is difficult to work with it. is there any other extension for IE that is more user friendly and easy to use??

    Read the article

  • jQuery live, change in not working in IE6, IE7

    - by fabian
    The code below works as expected in FF but not in IEs... $(document).ready(function() { $('div.facet_dropdown select').live('change', function() { var changed_facet = $(this).attr('id'); var facets = $('select', $(this).closest('form')); var args = window.location.href.split('?')[0] + '?ajax=1'; var clear = false; for(var i = 0; i < facets.length; i++) { var ob = $(facets[i]); var val = ob.val(); if(clear) { val = ''; } args += '&' + ob.attr('id') + '=' + val; if(ob.attr('id') == changed_facet) { clear = true; } } $.getJSON(args, function(json) { for(widget_id in json) { var sel = '#field-' + widget_id + ' div.widget'; $(sel).html(json[widget_id]); } }); }); });

    Read the article

  • Gallery has too much padding in IE7

    - by Amber
    My Flickr gallery looks good in all browsers except IE 7. What else do I need to put in my CSS code for it to not look so lopsided in IE 7. I added the display: block but it didn't do anything. a img { display: block; *display: inline-block; float: left; border: none; padding: 3px; background-color: #fff; border: 1px solid green; margin-right: 15px; margin-bottom: 15px; } Right now it looks like this. Is there something I'm doing wrong with the CSS? Should I be adding in something for IE so it can read it properly? This is my site

    Read the article

  • Inserting a newline into a pre tag (IE, Javascript)

    - by Itay
    In IE when I insert text into a <pre> tag the newlines are ignored: <pre id="putItHere"></pre> <script> function putText() { document.getElementById("putItHere").innerHTML = "first line\nsecond line"; } </script> Using \r\n instead of a plain \n does not work. <br/> does work but inserts an extra blank line in FF, which is not acceptable for my purposes.

    Read the article

  • AutoComplete field and IE

    - by user102533
    My web page does not have the autocomplete attribute that would tell browsers not to autocomplete the field. In spite of not having this attribute, IE 8 or Safari (not sure on other browsers) does not autocomplete the page. Autocomplete does work on some sites (such as Gmail) so I am assuming that the browser setting is not causing it? Here's the code: <tr> <td>User Id</td> <td><input name="userId" type="text" id="userId" runat="server" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Password</td> <td><input name="password" type="password" id="password" enableviewstate="false" runat="server" /></td> </tr>

    Read the article

  • POST method getting converted to GET in IE-9

    - by Sri127
    I have this line of code in my JSP. (I'm using struts 1.3) <html:form action="screening/mine.do" method="post"> . . . </html:form When the action corresponding to mine.do is invoked (using struts-config.xml), the page is getting submitted as GET instead of POST. All the request parameters including the required ones are getting lost due to this. This issue occcurs only in IE-9. The response remains as POST when I use other versions of IE or any other browsers. How do I make the response to remain as POST in IE-9 ? EDIT : I observed one more issue in this. Whenever the page is rendered in a new window, this issue occurs. Other places, the POST works fine in IE-9. Also, this issue occurs in Win7/IE-8, but works absolutely fine in XP/IE-8. Is there something to do with the OS as well??? Any solutions would be useful. Thanks!!

    Read the article

  • is DISPID_VALUE reliable for invokes on IDispatchs from scripts?

    - by Georg Fritzsche
    Continuing from this question, i am confused whether DISPID_VALUE on IDispatch::Invoke() for script functions and properties (JavaScript in my case) can be considered standard and reliable for invoking the actual function that is represented by the IDispatch? If yes, is that mentioned anywhere in MSDN? Please note that the question is about if that behaviour can be expected, not what some interfaces i can't know in advance might look like. A simple use case would be: // usage in JavaScript myObject.attachEvent("TestEvent", function() { alert("rhubarb"); }); // handler in ActiveX, MyObject::attachEvent(), C++ incomingDispatch->Invoke(DISPID_VALUE, IID_NULL, LOCALE_SYSTEM_DEFAULT, DISPATCH_METHOD, par, res, ex, err); edit: tried to clarify the question.

    Read the article

  • CSS working fine in firefox but not displaying properly on IE?

    - by Karthik
    I have the desired effect on firefox, which is to display like this: _________ | title |__________________ | | | | | | | content here | | | | | | | | | ____________________________ but it simply displays a deformed rectangle in IE What could be the possible issues? EDIT: This is the border of a webpage. The title is on the smaller box on top of the bigger one. Here is the link to the webpage: http://picasso.shsu.edu/~kkk005/index.php?view=ArtworkCommentary&OPPID=OPP.34:019 This does not display properly on IE

    Read the article

  • File URI link to local folder in IE7 not working

    - by Kakmonstret
    No matter what I do I cannot get either of these local File URIs: <a href="file://C:/Folder/">...</a> <a href="file://C|/Folder/">...</a> <a href="C:\">...</a> ... ...to work in IE7 (on Vista). I've tried putting the site in different zones (Local Intranet, Trusted Sites), turning on/off Protected Mode and fiddling with the security settings for the active zone. I've also tried many variations of the URI. But when I click the links, nothing happens. No errors either. Well-formed file URIs to the local file system work in all other browsers I've tried, including IE6 and IE8. I've also gathered from what I've read on the web that this should work. Also, the following JavaScript results in an access-denied error, regardless of zone/settings: <a href="#" onclick="return window.open('C:\\Folder\\');">#</a> Did this stop working in the latest IE7 and/or the latest Vista, or something? And if so, why is it working again in IE8 on Windows 7? Is there a workaround of some kind? (I don't know how to test with IE7 on anything other than Vista.)

    Read the article

  • Why can't IE6 shows semi transparent png8 files with alpha filter ?

    - by vvo
    -- read the whole question before answering -- Hi, i work on a big website that had a lot (45000+) of png24 images (with semi transparency). I converted them to png8 and it works very well (a big help on page load time...). The thing is i had to keep png24 files for ie6 users (with alpha filter to have semi transparent pixels) because we all know that we can't use png 8 semi transparent images in IE6 : either the semi transparent pixels will be opaque or completely transparent. I tried to use the alpha image loader filter with png8 images but it just don't work, the pixels are still opaque/completely transparent, no semi transparency. What's the reason it's not working ? Is there a difference for IE when dealing with semi transparent pixels from a png24 or from a png8 ? I couldn't find any information on msdn websites or on stackoverflow... This is crazy... ! DISCLAIMER : i'm not searching for a f**ckin fix IE6 png or sh*t like that, i already know alpha image loader or htc techniques etc, theses all works well with PNG24 files but doesn't work with png8 files.

    Read the article

  • L'Internet totalement coupé en Libye, y compris à l'intérieur du territoire, les URL de bit.ly en souffriront-elles ?

    L'Internet totalement coupé en Libye, y compris à l'intérieur du territoire, les URL de bit.ly en souffriront-elles ? Mise à jour du 04.03.2011 par Katleen Alors que la situation numérique s'était arrangée en Libye il y a une dizaine de jours, l'escalade de violences qui s'y déroule actuellement semble avoir tout remis en question. En effet, d'après plusieurs spécialistes, il n'y a plus aucun trafic Internet sortant ou entrant dans le pays. [IMG]http://www.renesys.com/blog/assets_c/2011/03/latencies_Libya2_AllSources_c-thumb-400x342-275.png[/IMG] Diverses entreprises dans les secteurs de la sécurité informatique et de la surveillance des réseaux ont constaté que l'espace...

    Read the article

  • Second CSS class not working in IE8.

    - by ProfK
    I have the following div being rendered to the client, but on IE, the checked-yes class is ignored. If I view the target element in the 'Developer Tools', that class is completely missing from the Style panel. The shift-item-present class is attached server side, and the checked-yes class client side, depending on the present attribute of the parent row, also shown below. <td><div class="shift-item-present checked-yes" jQuery1272958392665="94"/></td> Parent row: <tr class="shift-item" id="ctl00_mainContentPlaceHolder_ctl00_shiftList_ctl01_shiftRow" present="True" shift-id="641" jQuery1272958392665="64"> The page works perfectly in FF

    Read the article

  • IE sending through multiple unrequested requests for parent URL

    - by andyjeffries
    We have a rather large/complex web site (so it's not easy to extract portions of it). The problem we're having is that IE6/7/8 (but 6 is the worst) are sending through multiple requests for the parent of a URL (which fails, a different point). As an example, if you visited (dummy domain name obviously): http://www.example.com/view/event/123/456/78 We'd get 8-20 requests for: http://www.example.com/view/event/123/456/ appear in the Apache log. We've tried: Disabling all plugins (including toolbars, Flash, etc) Disabling scripting (e.g. Javascript) And it still sends through at least one erroneous request. We've viewed the requests through ieHttpHeaders so the browser is aware of them (i.e. it's not prefetching by the network's proxy). Any ideas? What can else could cause this?

    Read the article

  • Interpreting Accept Headers as intended in IE and Webkit

    - by Jrgns
    I developed a web app that responds with data in the format as specified by the client in the HTTP Accept Headers. Everything worked fine while using Firefox, but when I wanted to check my CSS / HTML on Chrome and IE, both of them wanted to download the index page, as if it's an unknown content type. After some research I found this article, which states that IE sends out a lot of crud in it's HTTP Accept headers, amongst others a list of image/* content types right at the start. This caused my web app to try to send the index page as an image/jpeg. So how do I know when to ignore and when to use the Accept Headers?

    Read the article

  • Les tests d'interopérabilités sur HTTP 2.0 bientôt amorcés, la navigation internet sera plus rapide grâce au multiplexage

    Les tests d'interopérabilités sur HTTP 2.0 bientôt amorcés, la navigation internet sera plus rapide grâce au multiplexageLe web est susceptible de changer fondamentalement bientôt. L'IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) prépare la version 2.0 du protocole HTTP, a expliqué Mark Nottingham qui dirige actuellement l'équipe d'IETF HTTPBIS. Pour sa première ébauche, HTTP 2.0 s'appuiera sur SPDY, le protocole développé par Google. Le responsable de l'équipe de travail prévoit toutefois des changements significatifs. Parmi eux, un nouvel algorithme de compression d'en-tête. Il faut aussi noter que bien que SPDY n'autorise que les connexions chiffrées, pour HTTP 2.0 elles seront facultatives. HTTP 2.0...

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149  | Next Page >