Search Results

Search found 14339 results on 574 pages for 'domain rename'.

Page 143/574 | < Previous Page | 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150  | Next Page >

  • How to deploy LogMeIn Free via GPO to entire domain?

    - by Keith Sirmons
    Howdy, I am looking to deploy LogMeIn to several clients. I am using LogMeIn Central with LogMeIn free. Central allows me to create an install URL to send to a client, but I want to create a GPO to deploy the LogMeIn to the entire domain of computers. None of the local users have local Admin rights to their workstations, which is why I want to deploy LogMeIn through AD instead of installing via the Deployment Link. Thank you, Keith

    Read the article

  • Nginx+Passenger: 502 Bad Gateway from Nginx when passing urlencoded URLs in GET vars

    - by jimeh
    Here's an example of the URLs that don't work: http://domain/do?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fperson http://domain/do?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2F However, the following URL does work: http://domain/do?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com Also, this only happens with Nginx, using Passenger with Apache it works fine, but we use Nginx on our production machines. Here's the entry in Nginx's error log: 2009/12/01 09:30:51 [error] 6407#0: *136 upstream prematurely closed connection while reading response header from upstream, client: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, server: domain, request: "GET /do?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2F HTTP/1.1", upstream: "passenger://unix:/tmp/passenger.6335/master/helper_server.sock:", host: "domain"

    Read the article

  • Internal server 500 error

    - by sanders
    Hello Everyone I have created the following script in my .htaccess file Options +FollowSymlinks RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} domain.eu RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^domain RewriteRule ^(.*)$ domain/$1 [L] This script should redirect domain.eu to the domain folder. But when I upload this script i get the internal server 500 error. Any idea's what goes wrong? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Redirect 404 errors without rewriting the URL

    - by Knocks X
    Is it possible to have an erroneous URL remain in the address bar while redirecting the user to a URL within my domain? I want www.domain.com/forum to be the actual site being served in all 404 circumstances but I don't want the referring URL to be rewritten (other than the domain portion, which is being done on the registrar level). This is my current .htaccess RewriteEngine On RedirectMatch permanent ^/$ http://www.domain.com/forum/ RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule .* http://www.domain.com/forum/ [L,R]

    Read the article

  • Is there a method to instantly, dynamically switch between several sets of name servers on a single domain with code?

    - by trnsfrmr
    I usually set name servers at an ISP, they often take 24 - 48 hours to resolve. If one has 2 separate sets of name servers (say from 2 domain parking companies) they want to send traffic to, is it possible to switch between the sets instantly without any delays? To be clear, how do you switch mydomain.com (ns1.nameserver1.com, ns2.nameserver1.com) to mydomain.com (ns1.nameserver2.com, ns2.nameserver2.com) instantly?

    Read the article

  • How do I use Group Policy on a domain to delete Temporary Internet Files?

    - by Muhammad Ali
    I have a domain controller running on Windows 2008 Server R2 and users login to application servers on which Windows 2003 Server SP2 is installed. I have applied a Group Policy to clean temporary internet files on exit i.e to delete all temporary internet files when users close the browser. But the group policy doesn't seem to work as user profile size keeps on increasing and the major space is occupied by temporary internet files therefore increasing the disk usage. How can i enforce automatic deletion of temporary internet files?

    Read the article

  • Why do some large companies use a different domain for sending emails?

    - by Andrei Rinea
    I've received notifications and newsletters from Microsoft and Facebook in the past and noticed that both emails came not from an address such as [email protected] or [email protected]. Not event [email protected] but both had different domains such as : [email protected] and [email protected] Why is this? Any particular advantage in doing so? Other than not polluting the employees email software, I can't see.

    Read the article

  • Is it my responsibility to code for errors on a completely separate website and domain when redirecting or doing a single sign on?

    - by kappasims
    If my application is responsible for redirecting/doing a single sign on to a destination managed by a third party, in general, where should I draw the line for error handling during this process? If an error happens on the other application's end, is it reasonable for my stakeholder to expect the application I am working with to share responsibility for handling these scenarios? Notes: I am going to keep solutions limited to those that entail only one request--I am familiar with the "do an xmlhttprequest and see how that fares before doing anything else" approach. I am speaking in terms of an enterprise-level application with fairly decent customer traffic.

    Read the article

  • Email been marked as spam

    - by Rodrigo Ferrari
    Hello friends! Friends, I tried a lot of changes, but no success to send the email correctly formated, I'm using the same domain to send mail and the email pass trough spf and authentication, but has been marked as spam for some accounts using gmail ou google app's. The header's are: Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: by 10.231.208.5 with SMTP id ga5cs194453ibb; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:08:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.213.18 with SMTP id l18mr4141524wfg.192.1295291312735; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:08:32 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from hm1315-29.locaweb.com.br (hm1315-29.locaweb.com.br [201.76.49.185]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a70si8528144yhd.33.2011.01.17.11.08.32; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:08:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 201.76.49.185 as permitted sender) client-ip=201.76.49.185; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 201.76.49.185 as permitted sender) [email protected] Received: from hm1974.locaweb.com.br (189.126.112.86) by hm1315-38.locaweb.com.br (PowerMTA(TM) v3.5r15) id h6i9r00nvfo8 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:31 -0200 (envelope-from <[email protected]>) X-Spam-Status: No Received: from bart0020.locaweb.com.br (bart0020.email.locaweb.com.br [200.234.210.22]) by hm1974.locaweb.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C03511E00B5; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:31 -0200 (BRST) X-LocaWeb-COR: locaweb_2009_x-mail Received: from admin.domain.com.br (hm686.locaweb.com.br [200.234.200.116]) (Authenticated sender: [email protected]) by bart0020.locaweb.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4B2F08CAFD6B; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:31 -0200 (BRST) Message-ID: <1295291311.4d3493af36027@admin.domain.com.br> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:08:31 -0200 Subject: Domain - Assunto From: Sistema <[email protected]> Reply-To: rodrigo <[email protected]> To: balucia <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at hm1974 X-Virus-Status: Clean This header has been marked as spam, I had no more ideas how to fix it and there are people borrowing me about this. Thanks and best regard's.

    Read the article

  • How to find the Fastest DNS servers to host our domain?

    - by Denis Volovik
    The question was born because lately we've seen a pretty odd (well, at least for us, for the first time) - error message in Google webmaster tools - "DNS lookup timeout" ... I was pretty sure that with eNom's 5 DNS servers (dns1... to dns5.name-services.com) we're pretty set... But it appears that from (Europe/Hungary), for example - dns1.name-services.com takes 170ms. to respond on a ping... while GoDaddy's ns75.domaincontrol.com - takes only 40 ms. to respond... and at the same time - dns2 to dns5.name-services.com - each result with a timeout error (on ping)... This issue came to our attention right in the final stages of optimizing our web-site (almost to death) - basically, just in time... I would love to move our domains to a fast (fastest?) and reliable DNS server.. - but how do I find one ? Also - I did the ping tests from various geographic locations (we have servers in many countries) and GoDaddy seemed to be faster than eNom almost in every case. I'd be very thankful for any hints on this! Edited: Well.. maybe this one does not have an answer, after all...

    Read the article

  • Ho to log on MySQL on CentOS 6.3 using root account from the domain and not localhost?

    - by Ziouas
    I don't know if I'll make the issue clear, but I've installed MySQL on CentOS 6.3 using root account on a specific domain (f.ex. root@mydomain), but when i try to log on to it I'm being asked for password to root@localhost account, which I do not have access to. How can I log on to MySQL installed on 'mydomain' and not to 'localhost'? I've tried editing my.cnf using bind-address='domain_ip', but it didn't help, it still wanted localhost password.

    Read the article

  • Is it bad to have the Reverse DNS for two IPs point to the same domain name?

    - by Daniel Vandersluis
    I am in the process of setting up a new server for my domain (the site will be moved, it is not for load balancing or the like), which has a different IP address from my existing server. My current server has a reverse DNS PTR record set up pointing its IP to mydomain.com. Is it bad to set up a reverse DNS PTR record for the new IP pointing to mydomain.com as well? Or should I wait until I do my migration to set up the record?

    Read the article

  • How does the Keyword Order in the domain name effects SEO?

    - by Sushil
    From the Google keyword research tool, I see "chuck norris jokes" has global 246,000 searches. And again searching "jokes chuck norris" has the same search result. But as see, order of keyword in search terms has, "hello how are you" and "how are you hello" has clearly different results. Now instead of search term (assuming "chuck norris jokes"), I was wondering, if I had to register chucknorrisjokes.com and jokeschucknorris.com, would it effect the ranking on the search result? Or would it be the same? As we see here, both the domains has the same keywords, just in different order. How would that effect? I hope what I am trying to say is clear.

    Read the article

  • How to bind a domain for MS Project Server 2010?

    - by Gk
    I've installed MS Project Server 2010 and have to connect via a URL like this one: http://mysite/pwa/ I want to connect using new domain like that: http://newsite/. I can use redirection settings on IIS but cannot connect by Project Client. Anyway to do that thing? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How can I keep my privacy while owning multiple domain names?

    - by Abby
    I want to own, create and run x# of domains. I do not want 'whois' to have my name, home address and home phone available to anyone who looks me up. I've already bought a mailbox that I can use for my physical address. But... that doesn't get my name and number question answered. What is the best way to be anonymous yet still be legal? Do I need to incorporate all my sites and get an LLC? Can I create a company name without becoming an LLC? Then there's the phone number.... Thanks in advance to all who respond!

    Read the article

  • Weird IIS with Windows Authentication + IE problem

    - by Paulius Maruška
    Hello. I have a website running on IIS and using Windows Authentication. All users that are configured to get access to the site are form a AD domain (not local users). In the properties of a Website, I have set to use the AD domain as the realm. Now, when using Firefox, Safari or Chrome - Everything is fine. When the user tries to open the site, he get's the login box. he enters simply "username" and "password" (let's pretend that it's an actual login and password :P) and he get's into the site. When using IE, however, things get nasty. When the user tries to open the site - he get's the login box. User enters the "username" and "password" again, but those get rejected! And when the second time login box pops up - it has the username filled in as "web-server-domain-name\username" which is wrong, because web-server-domain-name is not the domain where all users reside (it's "ad-domain"). I've spent days trying to figure out what's going on... Note, that if I manually enter "ad-domain\username" - I get accepted into the site without problems. So, my guess is that IE sends wrong username if domain is not specified. Anyway, IE is the only browser that triggers this behavior! Is it possible to do a server-side fix? Maybe it's possible to somehow auto-map the users to AD users? If it's not solvable server-side - is there a client-side fix for this? Thank you. PS: I'm more of a programmer than a sys-admin, so configuring servers isn't the strong side of mine... :P UPDATE: @Evan: Yes, "Digest authentication for Windows domain servers" is also enabled. @Eric: IIS version is 6.0. The authentication methods enabled are: Integrated and digest - all other methods are disabled. As for the security log. I looked at it, when doing "username" and "password" login in Chrome/Firefox and when doing "ad-domain\username" and "password" login from IE - the generated log messages are the same (I see no difference, anyway). When entering "username" and "password" I don't see any errors in the security (or any other) log, so can't tell what method it's trying to use. UPDATE 2: As suggested by Eric in the comments - I played around with Fiddler... While playing with it, I noticed, that when "username" and "password" is entered in FF and IE - the "Authorization" header value (encrypted) sent by IE is longer (almost two times) than one sent by FF. I tried to disable Windows Integrated authentication and only leave the Digest enabled - that fixed the problem (meaning, IE used the right realm just like other browsers), but that caused bazillion other problems with my site, because with Digest - user impersonation on the server doesn't work (that causes problems, when connecting to database etc). Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a subdomain for each user account?

    - by Sathish Manohar
    I notice two types of design used in web applications, some with a particular subdomain for users contents, and some with same URL structure for all the accounts. Ex: unique.domain.com and another_unique.domain.com for subdomains for sites like blogspot, wordpress, basecamp etc. while in the other approach domain.com/action1 and domain.com/action2 the content is shown according to the user logged in, but the URL is same for every user. What are main differences between both of these kind of design?

    Read the article

  • What Are The Benefits of a .com Domain Name?

    Dot com, internet and the web are often used to mean the same thing by many people, although they are all different. Dot come has come become synonymous with the World Wide Web, although it is just o... [Author: Tanya Smith - Computers and Internet - April 01, 2010]

    Read the article

  • What is more preferable, Creating dedicated domains for mobile apps that shares different content or associate them with folders in one domain?

    - by Abdullah Al-Khalidi
    I want to consult you in an SEO matter which i am completely lost with, I've built a social mobile application that allows users to share text content and made all the content that appears on the application available via the web through dedicated links, however, those links cannot be navigated through the website but they are generated when users shares content through the app to social media networks. I've implemented this method on three applications with totally different content, and I've directed all generated URLs to be from the main company website which is http://frootapps.com so when users shares something, the url will change to http://frootapps.com/qareeb/share.aspx?data=127311. My question, which one is more preferable, a dedicated website for each app that uses such method? or it is ok to keep doing it the same way I am doing it?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150  | Next Page >